Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Will former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton go on an apology tour for assisting in creating greater hostilities towards the United States by the perpetrated lie to save Obama's Candidacy and the 2012 election?
With the Congressional "Benghazi" hearings again in the news from a year ago 9-11-2012, and three witnesses testifying today 5-8-2013, of the State Departments actual knowledge of the terrorist attacks and the "stand down " orders that were given, we have to wonder if Hillary Clinton will go on an apology tour for revving up openly hostile aggression towards the United States with the false flagged video proclamation.
Don't you remember the "hostility" created all over the world regarding the fabricated story of the State Department about the "video" being the reason for the "protest" to which Hillary Clinton signed on as a voice? The video posted below the post is there for any who have.
[President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied to the American people when they both pretended that the attacks on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, were just a demonstration against the anti-Muslim video gone violent — even as the State Department wrote an intelligence assessment that said “we do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda” were involved in the attack.] http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/298369-benghazi-beginning-of-end#ixzz2Skq90fZu
Its almost a sad thing when we recall other people lying to Congress- Bill Clinton on Monica. Richard Nixon -Nixon appointments secretary, was convicted of lying to the grand jury and of course we cant forget the biggest one Barack Obama's actually handing out a fraudulent long form birth certificate, which Congress and the Courts haven't had the nerve to stand up to yet. As Americans I ask you this, "At what cost?", and "Is your life worth the cover-up?".
In Congress now testifying are Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant Secretary of State for counterterrorism; Greg Hicks, former deputy chief of mission in Libya; and Eric Nordstrom, former regional security officer in Libya.
According to Hicks, "everybody in the mission" believed it was an act of terror "from the get-go." But on Sept. 16 - five days after the attack - U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice hit the Sunday show circuit, peddling the theory that the strike began "spontaneously" out of protests in Egypt and was not a premeditated terrorist act. Rice's spot on "Face the Nation" that day was preceded by the new president of Libya, Mohammed al-Magariaf, who said his government had "no doubt that this was pre-planned, predetermined."
Sept 16th, 2012 Reports fire up about the Protest caused and the hatred toward the United States intensifies as a result of these lies not only told to the American People but to the world.
Essentially what we are to garner from this is that Susan Rice through Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama actually formulated a plan to enrage foreign powers against America further putting Americans in harms way all across the world.
If Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are the ones citing the rage to protect their political elections of respectfully 2016 and 2012, we see a direct link and more importantly a willingness to incite violence against America in order to protect their personal futures.
Again, as in my last post, the actions of deception of Barack Obama on his qualification for the Office of the President in the first place and the action of someone who is not qualified we'd expect to lead or chair such violence against the United States People should be handled by Congress according to USC Amendement 14, Sect 3.
USC Constitution Amendment 14, Sect 3
SECTION 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath ( Obama did as a U.S. Senator), as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,(lying about his identity and providing false documents to the American People in the White House)(The actions of inciting riots in wrongful prosecution towards the United States knowingly creating hostilities as happened in Benghazi) or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
With the D's trying to turn this into a political fight with the R's America can see why an Independent Party might be able to solve problems a little better. To me its sad that we as Americans might be fearful of our own protection based upon the party of politics we belong to. If I were stating as Chris Stevens did "We are Under Attack" the last place I'd want to look is in the White House, but apparently that's where Americans should be looking.
I think as Americans we should hope that the change we need in Washington is one of mutual consideration and that we don't "Stand Down" because we Stand Up. In Taking A Stand we are unique in the world, and our independence should be kept.
The Eligibility Teeth Might Be the Stop to Obama's Preferred Road of Cover-ups vs. The Road of Law
Re: Obama's Eligibility
Assertion:
[We need to stop with this.. it's never going to go anywhere. Republicans just come under ridicule because the press is on his side.. He's got fewer years left than he's served.. so let's go after his support.. the Senate and the House.. need to be fully in conservative hands.]
Answer:
You may be right, however O's shown a real capacity to do a lot in a short time. Look at Obamacare done in 1 year. The reason I think this eligibility stand and Constitutional Principle is important, and that it is handled in Court which is now in Alabama Supreme Court where by chance two of the Supreme there have stated Obama's shown nothing proving his eligibility, is that it goes down the same road.
“The highest law in this country is not the order of the Supreme Court of the U.S., not the order of the commander in chief, or any subordinate officer,” Judge Roy Moore said. So we have a Supreme Court Justice in Alabama now who understands in this sentence that we are a Nation of Laws, and those in authority positions are not exempted from the law as Obama thinks he is in the Constitutions demand for a natural born citizen.
“The same thing applies in the military as in the judicial system,” he explained. “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it’s not the order of a higher officer, not the order of a judge.”
In a 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”
Another Alabama Supreme Court Justice wrote in a previous case on eligibilty “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of [President] Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
The certain documentation” Parker refers to is the findings of an investigation conducted by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio which I also submitted to the United States Supreme Court for the first time in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that came up through the Georgia State and then Georgia Supreme Court to rest in SCOTUS and which has not received ANY Justice signed dismissal or Justice rendered decision from the highest court. We just don't know if they have reviewed it or if a Court Clerk got to it before the Justices could see it.
Obama's road is one of deception and cover-up. Obama actually prefers the road of "Cover-Up" rather then the "Road of Law". What does this mean?
Well, just take a look at the Administrations actions in a few instances and I think you'll get the idea that the Road of Law is one that just doesn't work for Obama, so he's chosen a road which he believes is more palatable, to perhaps himself, and in his eye, The People.
1- Obama's Birth Certificate is clearly manipulated and thus is not a valid piece of evidence and no Court has ever made a decision on the merits of the evidence of this and the two prong test we all know Obama fails of being born in the U.S. to two Citizen parents.
2- The killing of Osama bin Laden on May 1st, 2011 which I have called Obama's Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!, precisely at the same time Donald Trump was forcing Obama's forged long form fabrication out into the open. Has it been forgotten that Osama's body was dumped over-board before reaching U.S. Shores? Has it been forgotten that the media actually addressed the mis-handling of Osama bin Laden's body?
3- Fast & Furious Gun Running operation - An Administration operation in which guns were being given to known drug lords and drug dealers which led to the death of United States border agent Brian Terry and Attorney General Eric Holder being held in Contempt by Congress June 28,2012.
4-Many who think the eligibility challenge should be stopped also would say the same thing about Benghazi terror attack, where 4 people were killed including Ambassador Chris Stevens, after all its been a whole year. There is speculation that this was a bigger gun running operation to Syrian rebels then Fast & Furious was.
Face the Nation Sunday had a piece on the new witnesses coming forward as whistle blowers to what's been called the greatest embarrassment of our Nation. Rush Limbaugh who uttered "Compassion is no substitute for justice" said today May 6th,2013 ...its not going away. New witnesses and evidence. The lesson learned if we do drop it is one of what? If you can dodge the Law long enough it will go away?
5- The Boston Marathon Bombing terror attack, again the manipulated evidence of cover-up found by Glenn Beck here: “Wednesday at 5:35 p.m. the file is altered,” Beck said. “This is unheard of, this is impossible in the timeline due to the severity of the charge….You don’t one day put a 212 3B charge against somebody with deportation, and then the next day take it off. It would require too much to do it.”
With just these five examples, we see that for political gain Obama's willing to frame just about anything away from the truth and shape or cover-up the story. This road was chosen by Obama when he first went down the road of being ineligible for President and stating he was, much the same way he stated he had never gone by Barry Soetoro on his Illinois Law licence and then it was discovered that wasn't true. He can't get it back for the violation.
MLK Jr. said in Montgomery, Alabama "The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they do turn" and in his I have a dream speech said, "We refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt". Such political leaders as Trey Radel (R-Fla.), Steve Stockman (R-TX.), along with former Attorney General under Reagan Ed Meece are calling for President Obama’s impeachment should Congress be sidestepped over the coming debt ceiling or the Second amendment. Co-sponsors for the President’s impeachment bill already under consideration now are Walter Jones of North Carolina, Dan Banishek of Michigan, Dan Burton of Indiana, Mike Coffman of Colorado, John Duncan of TN., Louie Gohmert of Texas, Tom McClintlock of California, and Reid Ribble of Wisconsin, but impeachment is something you actually consider for a qualified President.
Obama's not qualified, and is ineligible which means he really needs to be removed by the Constitutions as a "disability".
We shouldn't be discouraged when the "quick fix" isn't around. Justices often takes its time. If someone robbed you of everything you had, would it be okay if after 5 years or 7 years they just got away with it? There's a very powerful precedent working here and often times the danger might be more in the lessons learned if we forget about it. What an incentive for the Government to prolong justice in order to skirt the law?
I personally believe Obama's eligibility is the Achilles heel that might stop us from going down the Obama preferred road named "Cover-ups".
With the silver lining of impeachment offenses waning hard in the vaults of time and justice,and the lack of help, support, and willingness to divulge evidence Congress hammers for in past cover-ups, ultimately the road of law in the eligibility department of the Constitution is the best way to preserve our national security interest. We absolutely need to hold Obama to the law rather then excuse him from the law.
The standard qualification demanded by our Constitution is a time test principle, and it is on this road Congress/SCOTUS may save America more "Cover-Ups" in what maybe the three longest years ahead of us. How many more Americans need die to save the Obama face in a cover-up?
Why has President Obama been allowed to falsify his identification using forged federal documents, a selective service card, a social security number, and more? Why has Congress and the Senate not demanded the same requirements of an acting president as they would and US citizen who is seeking employment or any other privilege such as a driver’s license?
The Constitutional teeth might be the only teeth we have left that can save us. I've been to the US SUPREME COURT twice on this, but for whatever reason or at any time, the Court can revisit it. I gave the same treatment to McCain in Federal Court in 2008. This is a bi-partisan issue and a Constitutional Principle. Lay it down, the gateway to the Country is open to foreign rule.
Obama clearly took an oath to defend the Constitution as a U.S. Senator, and as a Usurping President has engaged in the most nefarious fraud of identification this Country has ever seen which is why Congress should remove him as a "Disability" after a trial according to USC Amend 14, Sect. 3.
USC Constitution Amendment 14, Sect 3
SECTION 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath ( Obama did as a U.S. Senator), as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,(lying about his identity and providing false documents to the American People in the White House) or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
One thing I've thought about Lance Armstrong's admission of doping after winning all those bike races is that I feel the sorriest for the guys who were playing by the rules and entering the races legally eligible and qualified. For years they trailed Mr. Armstrong while he illegally took what would have been rightfully theirs.
How many of the men and their families and those life's would have been different if they hadn't been trailing someone who was doping, not legal, and unqualified for the race. In many cases their windows of opportunity were taken away by fraud and illegal actions much the same as Obama takes away from those of us who are actually qualified Constitutionally and eligible.
The wake of Obama's ineligibility has a toll of destruction, depravity, and a dissolving effect of not only law, but those who Obama's actions have hurt especially all of the Presidential Candidates in the race in 2008 and 2012, and that doesn't account for the wreckage that innocent victims suffer who are bystanders of his corrupt cover-ups from the least to the ultimate of sacrifices of life.
While the media might adore Obama, it is the sober faces of those losing limbs, parents losing their child, couples losing their mates, that ultimately have been the cost of an ineligible person usurping the office of the president. And, may those dieing say they have sacrificed these great sacrifices for a standard of law? Can they say our Constitution and the blood that was spilt was for the Constitution, or in violation of it?
That is, painfully, a reminder of why we at least shall not suffer in vein, but for the cause of our Constitution and the freedom and liberty in the Republic for which we stand. The Constitution at least for future generations must be our Standard and the Principles there in upheld.
Cody Robert Judy www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
Post Note 5-7-13 Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.)
“I think the dam is about to break on Benghazi. We’re going to find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks.
“We’re going to find political manipulation seven weeks before an election. We’re going to find people asleep at the switch when it comes to the State Department, including Hillary Clinton.
“The bond that has been broken between those who serve us in harms way and the government they serve is huge — and to me every bit as damaging as Watergate.”
General Makarov confirms Syrian terrorists armed with U.S. made Stinger missiles
www.examiner.com
Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Gen. Nikolai Makarov told reporters on October 23, 2012 that, “The General Staff has information that the
Martin Jeffries If a single Stinger missile was in the hands of the terrorists and somewhere in the United States, all air traffic would be at risk.. Congressman Issa suggested that 10,000 to 15,000 Stinger missiles might be in the hands of terrorists.. That would just about stop all worldwide air traffic and the economies of the world...
