tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post5902496779597938473..comments2023-06-16T07:16:35.729-07:00Comments on STONES : No Leg to Stand on- The Justices denied Judy v. Obama 12-5276Cody Robert Judyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17604281956365622417noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-24244869531181731432013-01-09T16:48:17.786-08:002013-01-09T16:48:17.786-08:00Well, I think you're right about that. That le...Well, I think you're right about that. That leads us back to the premis however that SCOTUS is not deciding the case. How could they even know what was in a case, unless it was noted to them by a Clerk? If the Clerks are against you, you have no access to a Justice?<br />If what your saying is true, not a single justice cared that the Constitution was changed by an Administrative Court Judge when it comes to the Office of the President. <br />That just doesn't make sense to me. I'd think if the qualification was going to be changed they'd want to make an intelligent ruling on it and consider it, especially given the Legislative Hard Line which has forbidden changes to the Art. II, Section I, Clause 9.Cody Robert Judyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17604281956365622417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-34799629741800307522013-01-08T16:36:35.256-08:002013-01-08T16:36:35.256-08:00I don't need to be one of the Justices. I just...I don't need to be one of the Justices. I just need to know how SCOTUS works. When a petition is filed the Respondent either files a response or waives its right to file a response. If it waives its right to file a response, and at least one Justice believes that the petition has merit, SCOTUS will call upon the Respondent to file a response. In your case, no response was called for, which means that your petition was "dead listed" - i.e., it was aside to be formally denied following the scheduled conference date. Your petition was never discussed at the conference on January 4. No response was called for, so your petition did not make it to the Discuss List. Look at the other birther cases which have been filed with SCOTUS and you will see the same pattern - e,g, Kerchner v. Obama, Taitz v. MacDonald, Berg v. Obama, etc.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-68694142818869425702013-01-08T10:26:53.836-08:002013-01-08T10:26:53.836-08:00The meaning of Natural Born Citizen was not define...The meaning of Natural Born Citizen was not defined by the Minor v. Happersett case. It was defined by the Wong Kim Ark case which was AFTER Minor v. Happersett, and which said:<br /><br />“It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.<br /><br />III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.”<br /><br />As you can see, that says that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth. Who told you that two citizen parents are required? They aren’t<br /><br />“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).<br /><br />“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)<br />smrstrausshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17130680385818556655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-31952228321827424522013-01-07T22:44:10.917-08:002013-01-07T22:44:10.917-08:00Cody -
Take heart. Look what is happening to Vene...Cody -<br /><br />Take heart. Look what is happening to Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. Word has it that he is being kept alive in a coma following cancer surgery. I surmise that he instructed his doctors that if the surgery wasn't successful and / or, that his condition was not improving, to keep him alive (anyway) to stave off meeting his Maker.<br /><br />Since all [here] has seemed to fail to bring Obama to accountability; the good and just Lord of all, will not fail. He is more than capable to do the same, what has happened to Chavez to our White House occupier, in a moment. At any rate; I have no doubt that there will be dispensed perfect accountability in the hereafter! Perhaps, this future reality will bring you some semblance of consolation:<br /><br />"Liars go to hell:"<br /><br />http://www.thechristianmessage.org/2012/04/liars-go-to-hell.html<br />Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10118869952876357837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-62317016258830510322013-01-07T21:07:57.625-08:002013-01-07T21:07:57.625-08:00Oh my gosh.. I'm so happy. Which one of the Un...Oh my gosh.. I'm so happy. Which one of the United States Supreme Court Justices are you..can you tell me?Cody Robert Judyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17604281956365622417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2374290665921138797.post-50402833008593358062013-01-07T21:04:53.336-08:002013-01-07T21:04:53.336-08:00You can hardly believe it? I told you on December ...You can hardly believe it? I told you on December 13 that your petition was doomed. If you are going to file petitions with SCOTUS, you should at least take the time learn how SCOTUS works. All it takes is one interested Justice to call for a response from the respondents. Not one of the nine Justices had any interest in taking your case. If no Justice calls for a response, it means that the petition has been denied. You wouldn't believe me four weeks ago, but perhaps you have learned something. Then again, perhaps not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com