Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY? Cody Robert Judy says "They Should!"

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY?

More and more Americans are seeing the value of the work I have been doing over the past 4 years. With the “Green Light” on Obamacare that the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court held this past Thursday along with a ‘contempt’ vote that was shielded by Obama’s executive order on Fast & Furious, one could surmise we have had some very destructive blows to ‘freedom and liberty’ dealt to us.

I wish I had good news to report about the U.S. Supreme Court receiving my case on appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court but in the horse world I’m familiar with let me parlay, “We were headed in to the class for a show and 10 yards before entering our champion stallion threw a shoe by stepping into a deliberately dug hole meant to sabotage our entry, and we had no choice but to scratch the class, and head off to the blacksmiths shop for a new shoe.

The good news would be we didn’t break a leg stepping in the hole and when I relate to you what happened I think it will be quite obvious that the U.S. Supreme court clerk responsible for this has got a major grudge against my action and dug the hole.
The bad news is the Supreme Court in Washington DC is in recess till the first Monday in October and I’m beginning to wonder about the door to the U.S. Supremes being definitively closed to me because of the unprecedented action it represents to the establishment in maintenance of the status quo, which everyone knows I’m not representing really well but rather exposing.

Now I have never been one to take adversity placed upon me as some grand conspiracy and I believe my record will do for that fact. While I have been tested and perhaps pestered with deficiencies I represented I have attempted more to accommodate those and to understand them, and correct them, where they accumulated into facts.

I just don’t think losing a game legally is worthy of poor sportsmanship and so when I have lost legally I generally shake my opponents hand, congratulate him, lick my wounds, and move on. However, when I am wronged blatantly, deliberately and intentionally I have no problem relating the facts of that to others which I am about to do, especially in light of Obama’s ineligibility as it certainly affects many, many, many more than me.

I relate the facts you certainly can make your own calculations and do the math.
1-Wednesday- June 27th 2012 approximately 10:30am, I reported and show the service of the ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ appealing the Georgia Supreme Court decision case no. S12D1584 JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, I received June 21st,2012, with a ‘received by signature’ United Postal Service Record, to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Clerks office which had been sent Monday morning.

2-Thursday-June 28th,2012 – Owing to security maintained at the U.S. Supreme Court and my own prior experience with them I know my document isn’t going to get a case number the day it gets there but I figure 24 hours later is a good time to check on it because you know it’s not like the DMV where they’re receiving thousands of entries every day and reasonably your document after its signed for, ought to make the Clerk’s office 24 hours after it’s received.

So I speak with Gail Johnson about Noon- EST time, who is my assigned case analyst and ask her point blank if she has received my case. She says “No” and refers me to the argument that you know it takes time from service to get through security and to them, and says, “ call back tomorrow”. I was actually encouraged by her request to ‘call back tomorrow’. This as you recall was the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was set, and did release their decision on the Health Care with a 5-4 vote upholding it in its entirety absent the confirmation that it was ‘Constitutional’, with Sotomayor and Kagan, both Obama appointees, in on the decision.

Of course without those two there, we are left with a pretty strong message from the dissenting Justices that the Act fails quite easily the Constitution, and we are also reminded quite clearly that without an eligible President signing their appointments, their confirmation is not legitimate. Now how important is Obama’s Eligibility? How important and imperative is my case?

3- Friday-June 29th –Noon -Approximately same time I call back and get Gail Johnson’s voice message that she’s out of the office until Monday July 1st,2012 and that if something urgent is needed please contact another analyst by the name of Redman, who also is ‘out of the office until July 1st. I make another call to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office and a nice operator tells me as I relate my predicament that he did see “Higgins” come in and will direct my call to his office. I get a voice mail and relate to him my name which they identify your case with, and ask for a call back. I call again at approximately 3pm EST and relate my desire for a call back upon the matter. Predictably I don’t receive a call back.

Of course I’m not all that discouraged because Gail Johnson related to me she had not received my package Thursday. The damndest thing happens Saturday morning.
4- Saturday-June 30th,2012 I receive in my mail box the entire box containing 11 copies of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari back with a letter from Gail Johnson dated Thursday June 28th,2012. Of course you recall I had called her and spoke directly to her and she confirmed she hadn’t received it.

Very interesting letter received that was taped to the top of the package that states the package is returned for the very same reason it was returned May 17th,2012 because the U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest State Court available.

Pictures of the Letters here:

June 28th Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

May 17th, 2012 Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

June 21st,2012 Order from Georgia Supreme Court

Wow! On the very first page of my document it says in the first paragraph, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584 Judy v. Obama is being appealed, and that the Supreme Court of Georgia had granted my ‘indigency’ status. How did she miss that on the very first page, first paragraph signed with a notary seal June 24th,2012?
Incredibly two things available here for us to discern because we know she can read- Either Gail Johnson didn’t read the document as an analyst assigned to that duty is supposed to, and ordered it packaged up unread and sent back the exact same moment it was opened, or Gail Johnson doesn’t know the Georgia Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Georgia presumed by her own letter to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I opened the box up, about 10 minutes after it cleared my security department, another letter was inside, which was indeed Gail Johnson’s letter to me May 17th,2012 that related to the April 4th 2012 version of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari which indeed hadn’t been reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court, but had been reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which I argued should suffice.

So, now I have returned to me by the U.S. Supreme Court clerk Gail Johnson not one but two State Supreme Court decisions, one from New Hampshire and one from Georgia, that are legally reviewable by the U.S. Supreme court. I really think this should call for her termination in the employment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Can you imagine just for an instance if perchance the U.S. Supreme court Justices had been notified Wednesday afternoon that my case had come into the Courts authority and was docketed, that could alter their decision on Obamacare, based on the eligibility requirement that an eligible president must first sign an Act of Congress before its legal?

How big is this case? How many people does it represent and or affect?

Can you imagine one Court Clerk having the power to keep something like this from the dissenting Justices on the eve of their Summer recess until after the Sept 5th National Democrat Convention in which a decision on my case could have moved Obama from even being included as a Democratic Party candidate at that convention verses being the nominee, and the Justices return scheduled for October after the convention?

I don’t think anyone upset with Obamacare passing even has a clue what it means to have another Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party qualified for a U.S. Supreme Court hearing with two State Supreme Court referrals to them means.
If anyone did I really suspect people would be going through the roof, and contributing to my campaign and calling their Senators and Congressmen and faxing the U.S. Supreme Court of this outrage, and burning down the phone lines to the U.S. Supreme Court. WND would have feature stories about the outrageousness of it, and small business magazines across the United States would be saying “contribute” the individual maxim to this guy which is $2,400 per individual small businesses or pay the estimated annual increase of $54,000 on healthcare for your small business.

Of course I need your help and I hope to have somehow inspired you of the importance and urgency of this case. You know the Voeltz v. Obama case getting so much publicity is stated by Esq. Larry Klaymen to be appealed by either side upon a decision suffered a big set-back with the Judge granting the motion to strike the Amended Declarative relief. Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/this-july-4-a-new-revolution-begins/ and here http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/unexpected-turn-in-eligibility-case-put-it-on-record/ - “Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted,..” How long do you think it would take Klaymen to reach the Florida Supreme Court and hence the U.S. Supreme Court?

Now, put into that equation he does not have a Democratic Party Candidate for President on the complaint, but a Democratic party member who is a voter and who by the standards thus far used by the Judicial Branch won’t have or satisfy the 3 levels of ‘standing’ upon the appeals into the Judicial Branch?

Also factor in Obama will by Sept 5th,2012 have the nomination of the National Democratic Party Convention locked up and how many Supreme Court Justices are going to see that one clear against Obama? Ask Mr. Klayman about the Political Doctrine Question and he will tell you the chances after Obama becomes the Democratic Party nominee are slim to none after Sept. 5th, 2012.

I’m calling for the only thing I believe will help and that is an all points bulletin to every Conservative across the board in the political arena to rally for my case. I will send it back to the U.S. Supreme Court this Monday and by Wednesday I would like to see about 10 national stories about this outrage and calls numbering in the thousands to the U.S. Supreme Court, your representatives in Congress and the Senate and if you hold any value to reaching across the aisle I even challenge Mitt Romney to come out and make a statement on the Justice happening with my case being locked out of the U.S. Supreme Court.

I believe that is possible if you will do your part in sharing this very real possibility that you cannot let slip by. If you’re a business owner or interested in employment Obama care is a major blow to small businesses and the capital they have to work with that would necessarily be opening new jobs.

Please act now… just DO IT! What can America do from Sunday to Wednesday, for the sake of our Country I’m asking you contribute your time, talent, energy, contributions to ‘Vision to Believe in’ represented by our Constitution and my campaign, The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

I believe this case is so important and has been biased so fraudulently by the Clerk’s Office that when and if the U.S. Supreme Court Justices hear about it, that it will merit the call for a ‘Special Session’ to be called by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in the Order to adjudicate the case without bias towards me before the National Democratic Party Convention Sept 5, 2012 in the interest of voting delegates at that Convention who have been chosen by the interest of State Tax Payers money to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

Tell the U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tax money has been used by the Democratic Party in the primaries and in such is responsibly connected to the Constitution and Obama’s eligibility. RESPONSIBILITY in taxes was the message of Obama care, let them hear about the responsibility to our Constitution that ‘taxes’ demands in representation.

Here is a copy of the complete signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTJkId_GBis

JUDY V. OBAMA REACHES U.S. SUPREME COURT -THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

BREAKING NEWS:

JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., U.S. SUPREME COURT RECEIVES APPEAL OF GEORGIA SUPREME COURT OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBLITY ESCALATING-

THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

June is not shaping up to be the best month for Barack Obama, as more and more Democrats are looking at the toxicity of Obama and realizing that standing by the man is one thing, but declaring their own political future over is quite another.

Just how much weight must be placed upon the anchor before rational democrats who are still supporting Obama decide the same? I’m proud of Utah Democrat Rep. Jim Matheson here in my home state for realizing the truth when it comes to covering up weapon involvement in border patrol agent murders, dealing arms over the border to drug trafficking, and pulling federal programs meant to work with local law enforcement in enforcing laws passed for persons illegally entering the United States such as Obama did the day of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, are not really things that Democrats should be supporting.

Catering to the Hispanic/Mexican/Latino population vote has become all too clearly a mix of bad intention, and so it is with Obama clearly defying our U.S. Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’, yet swearing out an oath and allegiance to preserve, protect and defend it. I can think of no better way to U.S.C. Amend. 14, Sect. 3- his sorry but blatant fraud and forgery.

For those hard working industrious people here working legally how big of a slap in the face is it for Obama/Holder/Clinton team to gun-traffic across the border? Why would they do that to people they claim to be working hard for?

Weapons to people known to be running illegal traffic across the border, drugs, sex-slaves, intelligence, and people are okay with that? That kind of makes standing up in a religious meeting where freedom of expression is the most important element of religious tenant and declaring I had a Book of Mormon abbreviated ‘BOM’ clearly represented as the evidence produced, in the Mormon Religion something that deserved 8 years in prison 20 years ago, while the other is seen as electable? WOW!

Come on , come on, come on – People I just know you anti-birthers on the Republican and Democrat side can do better than this. Your judgment is being strung out like a scrotum on the chopping block.

Has that been a service for the people here legally working hard on establishing good reputations or a dis-service?
Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54379772-90/holder-matheson-contempt-congress.html.csp
mcanham@sltrib.com

Now additionally to compound the doom of June for Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC received today, (June 27th,2012) at 10:49am the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, appealed from the Georgia Supreme Court denial of June 21st,2012.

Folks we are talking speed train 'fast-track', in the truest meaning of the word, and we may be talking just in time?

[Date: 06/27/2012
CODY JUDY:
The following is in response to your 06/27/2012 request for delivery information on your
Signature Confirmation(TM) item number 2308 3250 0000 2916 0065. The delivery record
shows that this item was delivered on 06/27/2012 at 10:49 AM in WASHINGTON, DC 20543
to L JOHNSON. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.]

There is a whole mess of problems the U.S. Supreme Court is dealing with the constitutionality of Obamacare, however wouldn’t it be shocking if they discovered in the late hour of deliberation they had a case that clearly met the criteria 3 legs of ‘standing’, and gave them power to rule upon Obama’s eligibility in the first place?

I felt like it was a slide into 3rd base and being called ‘SAFE!’ to have gotten the APPEAL in to the U.S. Supreme Court before the close of this session. I know it’s a nightmare but I didn’t plan it this way, it just happened.

Dealing with’ the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’, the court has extended its session now till presumably Thursday, or tomorrow, at which time they planned to close shop until October 5th,2012. It is notable however that the Court has at times stayed open till even the 1st of July.

That’s 30 days after the Sept. 5th, 2012 Democratic National Convention and clearly their recess would biased not just my complaint, but the whole Democratic Party primary season, and certainly every delegate vote cast for an ineligible candidate.

Just to gain some inkling of what just happened let me reiterate; “Shake & Bake!” is the United States Constitution- parroting the famous line from movie Talladega Nights of which those who saw it can have a smile, and those who didn’t might have a look at a YouTube Clip here to grasp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLF31AY25so


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43FfwAsSV4k&feature=related


I really don’t have a clue to what the U.S. Supreme Court will do, but I do know a couple of things that I will relate as facts to the anti-birther community that continues to roast the Birther movement as wing-nuts with a clue to any facts. Are you ready?

1- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received a Writ of Certiorari from a Presidential Candidate within the same party, clearing all 3 hurdles of standing, against Obama’s eligibility before the Democratic National Convention.

2- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received in such an appeal, a total disregard for their own precedent as they have from Judge Michael Malihi whose decision/opinion re-writes the Constitution’s unique qualification for our President that contrary to his opinion was not obliterated by the 14th Amendment’s “Citizen” clause found in Sect 1, which is an insult to the Constitution construction taboo.


Recently U.S. Supreme Court denied the Orly Taitz represented case that took a little over 3 years to get to the U.S. Supreme Court from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals starting in Central California Federal District Court in Keyes v. Obama. Allan Keyes was a presidential candidate but the 9th Circuit ruled he candidacy issue was moot as he didn’t continue in 2012 and the U.S. Supreme Court concluded the case on June 11th, 2012 with a denial of the Writ of Certiorari.

As a Presidential Candidate Allan Keyes was running in the Republican Party and never really had a clear shot at getting the Republican nomination from contenders like Mitt Romney or John McCain in 2008, so the standing was questionable at best. A similar ruling was just handed down on Presidential Candidate John Dummett represented by Liberty Legal Foundation in a Tennessee Federal District Court case that was basically made fun of by the Judge.

Defendants restate their position that Plaintiffs lack standing. Specifically with respect to Plaintiff Dummett, Defendants concede that Dummett is a candidate in Tennessee for the Republican Party’s nomination for President of the United States. As such, Plaintiff Dummett is not a competitive opponent of President Obama in any election and accordingly cannot establish that he has competitive standing to bring this suit. Furthermore, Defendants assert that Plaintiff Dummett has not taken steps to appear on a ballot in the state of Tennessee. For these reasons, Plaintiff Dummett cannot establish an injury-in-fact in this case.

Speaking on John Dummett’s write-in campaign for President filed a day after the defense argument that he would not likely face Obama as a Republican nominee as he ran in that party the court said:

Plaintiff Dummett’s certificate only came into existence after Defendants filed their reply brief. The introduction of a new argument with new evidentiary support would likely require that Defendants be given the opportunity to respond. Third, even if the Court considered the certificate, the exhibit on its face does not indicate that Plaintiff Dummett will actually be a write-in candidate simply by filing the certificate or whether other steps are required to establish his status. It is not clear then that the certificate proves that Plaintiff Dummett will face the President in general election. Finally, the exhibit is curiously dated the day after Defendants filed their reply, giving the appearance that the certificate is a device to cure whatever standing problems Plaintiffs may have. At this point in the proceedings, Plaintiffs have not properly brought that issue before the Court. For all of these reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Response is DENIED.

Now I bring these cases up not to belittle the hard work that went into them, nor the desire to see the Constitution upheld, for I feel these cases had that intent, but I bring them up to point out the complete difference that is represented in my case to the U.S. Supreme Court case with the direct competition between Obama and I in the Democratic Party for the nomination, and the complete disregard I have received from getting on the Ballots from the Democratic Chairmen’s bias towards Obama who I have shown is ineligible to be represented to the Secretary of States as eligible.
Indeed it’s a fraud in my mind to represent one candidate in the Democratic Party as the potential nominee who is voted for and recommended to use the States primary funds collected from tax payers in the actions of voting for him when he is ineligible for the Office of the President.

Indeed my campaign has represented itself competitive as say Mitt Romney’s on the internet with over 160 campaign commercials and videos, a blog with near 200 entries, a maintained web site with some 100 pages and campaign contributions coming in from near half the states. My campaign started the week before Gov. Rick Perry got into the Republican Campaign for president just to let you know how long it’s been around, and how long it’s lasted.

Anyone who discounts the time and effort and money and sacrifice that has gone into my campaign ought to just itemize themselves my campaign using estimates of the Republican Candidates side for what they had as far as the campaign items I’ve mentioned. I think one of the least of these was former Gov. and China Ambassador John Huntsman’s who was into it over 11 million dollars before he resigned his campaign- Santorum near 18.7 million and Paul 35 million-

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/25/news/economy/Romney-campaign-spending-vote/index.htm


These campaigns, all of them didn’t come close to challenging Obama directly as mine does now. So what will the U.S. Supreme Court do? It's anyone's guess but they sure wouldn't have to release any decision on Obamacare if they find he is not an eligible person qualified for the Office of the President and certainly could not sign any law.

That is why my case ought to take precedence over their deliberation of Obama care and they ought to immediately set up a time and schedule to hear my case.



Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES


Just as an add I wanted to put the link up of Esq. Larry Klayman's proposed Order denying the Motions to Dismiss which I thought was very informative, professional, and thorough.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/98311427/FL-Voeltz-2012-06-25-Voeltz-Proposed-Memorandum-Order#page=23