Changing Impurities of Principle Prided by Politicians as Popular

Changing Impurities of Principle Prided by Politicians as Popular

A couple of days ago I had the question come into my mind "Why have elected officials all across the Nation, Main Stream Media pundits, and so many businesses and corporation executives taken a stand so hard for Obama and so definitely against the Constitution?"

Its actually hard for me to understand and to see the arguments of delusion when it comes to Obama emphatically not being a natural born citizen and how so many people will in their own defense of him state his mother was an American Citizen so Obama is also, denying in their own statement the fact he is not a "natural born citizen" that requires being "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents", and also recognizing in their own statement that U.S. Representatives, U.S. Senators and in fact the President's office required being a "Citizen", however only the President's Office required after the Constitution was signed being a 'natural born citizen' as was specified in the grandfather clause of Article I, Sect II, Clause 5.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8




'..or a 'Citizen' of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution', clearly tells us that after the Constitution was signed two full generations were required for the Office of the President known and understood to be those "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, and clearly our first President George Washington and first Supreme Court Justices of the United States Supreme Court John Jay understood that.

Yet I see time and time again people make the statement that Obama's mother was a "Citizen" so he is too. We're not talking about Obama not being a 'Citizen' for heavens sake, we're talking about him not being a 'natural born citizen' and the differences are notable in the requirements for U.S. Representatives to be "Citizens" and U.S. Senators to be "Citizens" and for those who were "Citizens" before the Constitution was signed this exemption clause was penned into the Constitution.

It's equivalent to the "Bait and Switch" tactic any business would be ridiculed for using? For those not understanding "Bait and Switch" let me sum it up with another word for you "Obamacare". Not only are we seeing the 'bait and switch tactic used in Obama's identification fraud in the way I mentioned but the same tactic is being used for Obama policies. Please consider the text definition of the Bait and Switch from wiki if you will

"Bait-and-switch is a form of fraud used in retail sales but also employed in other contexts. First, customers are "baited" by merchants' advertising products or services at a low price, but when customers visit the store, they discover that the advertised goods are not available, or the customers are pressured by sales people to consider similar, but higher priced items ("switching").

How many personal accounts have you heard about people logging on the Obamacare web site and finding out their insurance was much higher than their previous insurance? How many personal accounts have you heard of about people being 'shocked' at the price of Obamacare after being led down the path by Obama that it would be cheaper then their old insurance? How many personal accounts have you heard about people who were "told" by Obama over and over and over again that they could "keep their doctors", 'they could keep their insurance", and then found out neither of those was true and they would be fined if they didn't sign up for Obamacare and perhaps be imprisoned?

Why would you need to 'criminalize' someone into a plan like Obamacare that is so fabulous? The language states you can be subject of 5 years in prison and a quarter of a million dollars as stated by Representative Peter Roskam R. Ill.


How sad should America be that the Government has intrusively entered into an agreement with their doctors to imprison them and that their IRS Tax Man has now been armed to enforce that? The letter from the JCT includes a list of civil and criminal penalties. These aren’t penalties for not buying insurance, however. They’re penalties for refusing to pay the resulting tax. Barthold’s letter says: Barthold letter, Nov. 5: Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:
Section 7203 – misdemeanor wilful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
Section 7201 – felony wilful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.

Its hard for me to fathom my fellow friends in the Democratic Party and the Republican Party's going so far out on a limb from the Constitution as to criminalize people for a choice 'not to get health insurance' and that your own Doctors and Nurses could be brought into a court room to testify against that choice in order to enforce that penalty.

Well, getting back to Obama not being qualified for the Office of the President because he was not 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents' however which way you'd care to look at it assuring two full generations void of alien citizenship, we must ask the question "Why?" Why have people that we elected and trusted seen such a bait and switch as credible and our own Constitution so unsavory?

In an excruciatingly poignant travesty seen in the case of Allan West who was approached by law enforcement and an elected sheriff we read: The bottom line of that conversation was that West told Zullo (after hearing and acknowledging the evidence of the case) that he couldn't get involved in that because he might have future political aspirations – he couldn't afford to be associated with that. Lt. Zullo assured him this was NOT a birther issue – this was a proven criminal forgery and fabrication of identifying document issue. He assured West that he would be backed up by a full and professional criminal investigation. Lt. Zullo asked West if he could at least help us to open other doors with other VIPS. West reaffirmed that he had no interest in helping us."
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/allen-west-refused-to-advance-obama-forgery-case-because-of-future-political-aspirations/#mdoFrSTHTshOOmQD.99

"Future Political Aspirations" can you imagine anyone having a future political aspiration who didn't want to uphold the law, who didn't want to take a stand for the Constitution and that the revelation contrary to that would not sink a politicians chances forever in America?

As I pondered the question again, ""Why have elected officials all across the Nation, Main Stream Media pundits, and so many businesses and corporation executives taken a stand so hard for Obama and so definitely against the Constitution?" the answer came to me and that was all summed up in one word "POPULAR".

In order to get elected you have to be "popular" and that takes 'media' and 'people' willing to support you in that 'popularity'. I understand that word very well. I was pretty popular in highschool. I had lots of people who thought well of me and what I did as a highschool running back with a 6.7 yard per carry average.

I sued McCain and Obama which you can see here and here because they were not 'natural born citizens' qualified for the office of the President. I was the only one who ran for President in 2008 and 2012 that did in all of America. I assure you I did it because of 'principle' not popularity.

When 'principle' is trumped by 'popularity' you are on the path of the devils leading to hell. I'm just not sure why politicians who want to lead American want to lead the population on a path to hell? That doesn't make any sense to me.

You know my Mom's got a lymph node in her back that has doubled in size the last thirty days. She's been crying and calling me in agonizing pain. I took her to emergency October 28th and they did a CAT Scan and somehow missed it. The doctor sent her home with pain patches and a chiropractic appointment. She asked him point blank at the emergency center ,"Is there anyway you could have missed something?' He said, ""yes" because what we are very good here at is taking a picture of what's happening "now"." Continuing he said, "What we are not good at is seeing in the big picture what happened in the past, and of course what will happen in the future."

I thought that was a very good answer for what was obviously perplexing all of us. Now here we are some thirty days later and her back doctor does an MRI and see's the lymph node has increased by half its size with the comparisons of the CAT scan used October 28th. Her back Doctor says, "I'm sorry to tell you this but you have an emergency going on and you've got to contact your cancer doctor".

My point is IF Obamacare was understood to be an emergency infecting the body like a cancer and growing at an alarming rate that the doctors or politicians have not identified as an emergency capable of killing us, is it any wonder that the 'bait and switch' that seemingly good men have been fooled with in office now is a sign to you that they are not capable of leading you in 2014?

Shouldn't it be plainly aware to you now, that Obama is not a 'natural born citizen'? How does that apply to 1/6 of the economy of the United States as it relates to Obamacare? Well, if Obama is not a 'natural born citizen' he is certainly not capable of signing legislation passed in the House and Senate into law. Obamacare is indeed not law but is constitutionally invalid?

You know I am urged by the spirit to acknowledge my mother in ways and strengths that you cannot imagine being in a 5'4" frame. She left millions of dollars more then once in her life based on "principles" and against the 'popular' plan or against popular advise, even to what you'd say was the 'hurt' of her children in the small picture.

However, in the larger picture she taught me to take a stand for 'principle' against that which may be popular. While I am in no man's mind perfect I am not ashamed for my actions in many instances standing for 'principle' that wasn't popular. Many have tried to twist and contort even my own stand against my religious leaders as somehow "criminal" and for which I should be ashamed.

Thinking about "principles" verses "popularity" this comes to my mind Isaiah 53:2 King James Version (KJV) v.2 "For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him."

I can tell you with a clear conscience I am not ashamed for taking a stand for 'principles', even though taking a stand for them didn't make me popular and indeed made me infamous. God is my witness and we'd expect him there in a religious meeting. It was in fact impurities of perfection that polluted principles that championed a criminal case against me, and nothing more then the same thing that has thus far kept Obama in the White House avoiding a trial with the evidence that poignantly points to the truth of his not being qualified to sign legislation and of certainly being an invalid in the White House.

If our forefathers of the United States had bent and twisted under the weight of being popular against the constraints of principle this Nation would have never been founded. If nefarious judges rule and corruption has replaced the institution of principle as the pride of our Nation, we shall not be responsible for lifting our future generations up to Heaven, but for dragging them down to hell.

Quite simply, though I know I am not perfect I strive to lift others up, not by lying or twisted baits and clever switches, but with the power of principles instituted in the eternities as the truth that will set us free. I urge all my much more successful political colleagues to consider the power of love to be greater then the power of hate, to consider the power of truth to be greater than the power of the lie, to consider that courage trumps cowardice and I call upon all the Citizenry of this Country to employ the same power and put your shoulder to the wheel in taking a stand with me to urge Congress to consider the principle hearing called for in the demands of justice for all to employ the evidences collected to be seen..to be heard..to be recorded in the Halls of our Congress regarding the usurpation of the White House by some one who is incompetent, or in other words unqualified, for that office according to U.S.C. Amend 14,Sect 3.

What measure of 'Global Justice' can support the crippling calamity of Usurpation whilst extending the handshake of law and not be seen as hypocritically weak? We here in the United States have a United States Constitution that is the Supreme Law of the Land.

What are your views, standards, and principles and where did they come from?
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here


We are CELEBRATING 90,522 more informed readers here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com. I want to personally thank you for stopping by!

Breaking News: Bachmann reports House Judiciary Committee meeting discussing over-reach of the White House. Obama is not a King, no man is above the law.


You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand