Pages

Friday, February 21, 2014

Is Hollywood Wising Up to Obama's Wise-Guys Act

Is Hollywood's Wising Up to Obama's Wise-Guys Act

Hollywood's not REALLY different in the TAX LINE but the rich did'nt get rich by Being Stupid except on Obama's Qualifications.


Now the Federal Communications Commission is going to start putting monitors in all radio, television and newspaper stations in a study of how their individual news is reported or under-reported to the public Hollywood has got to be seeing something is amiss. I'll betcha they don't even know about my walking into Clear channel with a check for an advertisement campaign of my small business that included my book, the add and campaign being agreed upon and after two adds running my being called down to the station and handed back my check in a refusal to air my campaign.

Yeah, that happened and their worried now that it could stifle freedom of the press? Forget about the cake-maker who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple getting married who was chastised by a District Court this is a political campaign that painted me as a Constitutional hero they didn't want to run. WELCOME to my world. You know the bad thing about Government regulations is sooner or later you might not have a guy in the House that is to fond of you maybe like the last one was. That is when your policy recommendations and all your contributions suddenly slam into a fire wall.

Hollywood declares good business is good business., so much for those who say they are willing to give a little extra in taxes. You knew deep down it was a poorly written and a very poorly delivered line, as Hollywood got behind Obama and declared they'd just love to give a little more of their income to taxes, but as the debate for House of Cards shows to the Maryland Legislature who provided 31 million dollars for the first two seasons of the wildly popular series House of Cards, the bottom line is they like anyone are looking for a better business deal.

“I am sure you can understand that we would not be responsible financiers and a successful production company if we did not have viable options available.”, was the coded message sent from producers of House of Cards to the State Government. Responsible Financiers.. hummm, that's interesting. Responsible Financiers of what? The Constitution? Obama's ineligibility qualification exemption? Who knows? I love the series!

‘House of Cards’ threatens to leave if Maryland comes up short on tax credits
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/house-of-cards-threatens-to-leave-if-maryland-comes-up-short-on-tax-credits/2014/02/20/bf9a8206-9a70-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html?hpid=z5

Robyn Wright who plays a starring role in House of Cards as Mrs. Claire Underwood was recently quoted as saying its pretty sleazy in Washington DC with media journalist sleeping with their Washington DC insider informants she found in her research for the part.

Taxes considered paid by the Government to businesses by way of tax exemptions is a little like sleeping with the devil and hoping things will turn out ok and on the other side of the table the public has a good idea of what ransom means when their prison wardens walk-in to the Legislative hearings threatening to release violent criminals unless they get a new prisons and more dough.

But not 'wanting' to pay more taxes is a direct violation of what you'd say was a stand for the left leaning liberals. What? That's why when I heard this news about House of Cards, playing their cards for more tax exemption money I thought, 'Way to go! There's the good old competition, just like football in a capitalisim.' You know what Hollywood? The thing is if you keep voting 'liberal' the Government is going to blanket this Nation, so there is no place to go and you won't get out of the country to film cheaper either. That's what Big Brother does if you hire a guy who could care less about the Constitution. "Here I was led to assume, from their support of Obama, that they were standing in line ready to give more?", I'd love to hear Kevin Spacey playing Mr. Frank Underwood in House of Cards say that line!

So what's different with those celebrities who say they are in line to pay more taxes along with Obama, because I think if you take somethings into context, you might just find out the "IF" part, and understand the "IF" part isn't happening.

Will Smith says he's cool with a tax-jack of 30%m but if you read more the criteria is in the "IF", it will keep my country growing. The only thing that's been growing besides taxes is our Countries debt up 7 Trillion since Obama took office.

While paying 1 billion in taxes Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerburg is cool with higher taxes, but wait just a minute, Facebook got a tax deduction for every dollar.

Chris Rock thinks if he pays higher taxes people can have jobs, but its the small businesses that create more jobs than the Federal Government or Big Businesses in America by far.

Matt Damon says he's rather pay higher taxes than see programs cut that are helping kids, but the Federal Government did a study that "Head Start" didn't significantly make a difference after the 1st grade, so without the warrant we can suppose Matt's fine with not being charged so much on taxes.

Ben Affleck said with O'Reilly, said 'His [Obama] major policy goal of changing the tax structure so that the wealthy pay their fair share, to me, is of towering importance. However, Affleck's idea has restrictions because he thought we were just going to go to pre-Bush tax cuts, and it certainly stops with what he can't afford.
"I thought we were just going to return to the pre-Bush tax cut numbers. But, yes, I agree, you and I -- I don't know, you know, what your nut looks like, but I don't spend so much that I can't afford to pay a little bit more in taxes"

Actually when 400 of Forbes list having a networth of over a billion were asked, "“Are you, like Warren Buffett, willing to pay higher taxes?”, only eight responded in the affirmative. Oprah Winfrey, who endorsed Obama in 2008, did not respond. Nor did liberal media mogul Ted Turner. Prominent Democratic Party donors from Hollywood such as Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Barry Diller did not express a view. Philanthropists Bill Gates and Michael Bloomberg — whom we queried repeatedly — refused to comment on Buffett’s argument, even as it became a central part of Washington’s political conversation.

Jay-Z says most people with a conscience are willing to pay more, if it went to the right things, like people in poverty, people who needed it, but I'm getting from him the if doesn't include those who can make more money on the dole then they can working. He also believes in 'transparency' and clear definitions, and accountability, as he says when things don't improve you have to wonder 'where's everything going?'.

The bottom line is all these people if they went out and spent their money themselves could probably create more jobs, and help the economy grow much better than a over baring, high regulating, and growth stopping unconstitutional Government making the people bow down to it, rather then serving it by getting the hell out of the way.

Here's one for him that clearly defines Obama is not a natural born citizen according to the Constitution. The grandfather clause held specifically that those born in the United States who were "Citizens" did not have to be 'Natural Born Citizens' by issuing what is called the grandfather clause on the President's qualification demand, " Or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution"

So the only way you could just be a "Citizen" and still be President is if you were living at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Obama was not living at that time, but several of our Presidents were.

George Washington was born in Virginia but his parents were both British subjects, making him a 'citizen' but not a 'natural born citizen'.

John Adams second president born in Massachusetts but again both parents were subjects of the British crown.

Thomas Jefferson, third president born in Virginia also a Citizen, but not a natural born citizen because his folks were British subjects.

James Madison, fourth president born 25 years before the Declaration of Independence, James Monroe 5th President born in Virginia 18 years before, John Quincy Adams six President born in Massachusetts, Andrew Jackson 7th President born in South Carolina all were born in the U.S. but did not have parents who were both American citizens at the time of their birth, so they had to use the grandfather clause in order to qualify for the office.

That is why , Or a "Citizen" was used to describe the president's qualifications at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

For those still confused and seeking divination that the standard for "Citizen" and "Natural Born Citizen" were different at the time and are still different in our time, please ask yourself why only the term "Citizen" is written regarding U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators written at the exact same time as the qualifications for President?

A CONSTITUTION RECKONING



Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Contribute for Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

P.S.
I want all to know my desire is simply to uphold our Constitution. It is the law by which I know we all will be blessed against all odds. Now enjoy the new song I wrote, performed, and produced. Crank it up and Enjoy! WHEN LOVE'S IN THE RAIN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stFyfFMQT-M















No comments:

Post a Comment