BREAKING NEWS - Obama Eligibility Case Decision and Response Includes Obama's Justice Nomination

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - Obama Eligibility Case Decision and Response Includes Obama's Justice Nomination

The U.S. 10th Circuit delivered a punishing blow to Judy v. Obama et.al., 14-4136 dismissing it and upholding the lower U.S. District Courts decision calling it frivolous, malicious, and wholly incredible. The 5 page decision was rendered to day out of the Denver Appellate Court after being reported in chambers for more than a month.

My initial reaction was one of being pretty disappointed and hurt. I'm not sure being dismissed as frivolous and malicious was as insulting as if I'd been dismissed for a lack of standing, but the result is all the same. It was flabbergasting to read the Court's Order and Judgement to say the least understanding first hand how very harmful allowing Obama to run roughshod over my legitimate qualified and Constitutionally adherent Campaign was and how deceitful and fabricated his was.

As I begin delving into the decision after my initial shock thinking this was just incredibly awful, came the question on who were these Justices? That's when I looked them up and found one of the three had in fact been nominated by the Defendant/Appellee of the case Barack Obama and the other Democrat was nominated by President Bill Clinton. I could not have imagined a more ridiculous scenario then to think that the Judge entering this decision was receiving his paycheck based on a defendant I was making a claim against?

All the thousands of hours and hard work just goes up in smoke to something far less deserving and destructive of the U.S. Constitution in Obama's forged and fraudulent identifications known as the fabricated long form birth certificate and draft registration. Yes, he is in the Office of the President but under what horror and fraudulent circumstances?

Yes, receiving more votes but for who in the consideration of the fabricated long form birth certificate and certainly Obama's own admission his father Obama Sr. was a foreign citizen at the time of his birth. Indeed, the founders and framers had expressed interest firmly that the Office of the President was not to devolve upon foreign or alien persons. That was the reason they expressly formulated a higher criteria of demands for qualifications in the Office of the President from that of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.

A two generation protection was laid out for the Office of the President cited as a natural born Citizen, rather then a Citizen cited for the lower Congressional House and Senate. No foreign influence was discerned as meaning 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.'

The eight attempts since 2003 to legally change the qualifications for the Office of the President bear the greatest testament to that definition as they all wanted to change the meaning mentioned to something along side the qualifications of U.S. Reps and U.S. Senators requirement of "Citizen". These attempts failed but do broadcast to all that Congress knows exactly what I'm saying to be true. If it wasn't so, why would it have been necessary to change at all?

I think the American People know that something is a foul, and the trust has been spoiled but still without a champion to lead the Court cases being in the Presidential Race, everyone shrugs their shoulders in hopelessness and despair. Not even the strongest politicians have any hope of moving it into the Courts without being called racist by the Media because they cite McCain as not being questioned about his foreign birth. I did take McCain to Court but the Court ruled after the election that it was moot because he had lost.

So Obama won and is ineligible and now what does the Court say? Its highly unlikely going to be successful. Well it sure as heck isn't if the Court won't even hear it that's for sure.

You can read the ORDER and JUDGEMENT here and... you can read my RESPONSE or request for a REHEARING En Blanc here.

Update: Here are the three very important questions I posed to the Court to justify Rehearing if:

Question #1- Does Justice Gregory A. Phillips having ENTERED FOR THE COURT the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT on this case February 3rd,2015 having been considered to the U.S. Senate for Confirmation with the favor of the Appellee/Defendant in this case, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro in the nomination process and thus his very employment as a Justice in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals constitute an prejudiced dismissal summarily instigated upon the Plaintiff that would seem at best a compromise of judicial discipline in recusal decorum and at worst an impeachable offense?

Question#2- June 25th, 2014 this Court handed down a decision favorable to ‘individual rights’, considered standing and upheld marriage in Kitchen v. Herbert No. 13-4178 and considered the rights of an individual who is unpopular more important per the conflicting referendum of all the people in the entire State of Utah and it’s Constitutional Amendment in the State, which does not come on political easy street; isn’t the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT of this case dismissing it as frivolous a conflict of the Court’s own interest and judgment in that case in the interest of Individual Rights?

Question#3- The conflicting statements in the ORDER and JUDGEMENT asserted by the Court leave criminal mischief, fraud, forgery, and a declaration of the precedent case in Minor v. Happersett regarding a natural born Citizen being “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” by the U.S. Supreme Court undefended and a wreck; and fair elections on equal terms for all the Candidates, per race, per qualifications within the U.S. Constitution in total disarray and the Appellant/Plaintiff without recourse in the infringements of his Civil Rights to a fair race; Does this not deserve the attention of the full Court and the political corrections that might be made for the next general election where the entire U.S. population has a stake and claim for fairness, equal treatment under the law in the considerations of our Republic?

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN COURTS AT THE SAME COURT?

To decipher this a little, the Order and Judgement released today was authorized by a panel of three judges. The whole or full Court considered to a panel of five or more. So, the decision released today was by a panel of three justices and my asking for a rehearing en banc is a request for a bigger panel of Justices to make a decision on wither to hear it.

I've basically asked the Court to recuse both the two Democrat Judges nominated by Obama and President Clinton because as I stated in the Petition for Rehearing Clinton's appointment conflicts with Hillary potentially being a Candidate for the Office of the President in 2016 and there is a interest to protect that.

So that's the news, we'll submit this and see what happens. I could sure use your help and thank you for passing it on and considering this essential to our national security.

Yours Truly
Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here