Pages

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Trump v. Hillary Birther Debate- Constitution or Color Who Will Win?

FEATURED EDITORIAL
   THE POST & EMAIL


        Trump v. Hillary Birther Debate    
          Constitution or Color             
Who Will Win? 


The Birther Debate has never been just about Obama. It's never been just about Color, but it is about a qualification of Time. The time it takes to be a [ natural born Citizen ] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

It's not America saying you shouldn't marry a foreigner, or even that you shouldn't take your spouse and go drop some kids in a Foreign Country , or we will abandon you. No, America still offers American Citizenship in the many varying States of Congresses Naturalization ACTS, but you simply would not qualify for the Office of President.

Of course if Politics is your thing, the Office of a U.S. Senator, the Office of U.S. Representative, maybe even a U S. Supreme Court Justice can be yours. Those offices are open to all American Citizens meeting the age requirements differing in every office.

Now there has only been 42 Constitutionally Qualified U.S. Presidents and 2 unqualified Barack Obama joins with Chester Arther in the alt- Qualification Department,  or Usurper.

50 Days before the Election and who would have guessed Obama's Qualification would mean so much to Hillary Clinton?

She raised it as a pejorative against GOP Republican Candidate Donald Trump yesterday at a Black Women's Conference saying Donald Trump for 5 years has been the Birther Movement Leader and that he owed Barack Obama and America an apology.

Donald Trump of course offered 5 Million to a Charity of Obama's Choice if he'd be more transparent in his identity documents like College Entry, Divorce Records of his Folks,  Passport Records that would collaborate with his 3 yr long released form birth certificate many called fabricated. Of course the long form fabrication Obama released gives him a dual inherited allegiance which shatters any possibility of meeting the Time Frame associated with [natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

It's True, Donald Trump at this Stage of the Election doesn't give a hoot about Obama's Qualification. Obama only has a few months left, and what Donald needs now to win the Election is a few more Black and Brown Votes which Hillary Clinton is throwing a mote up against with all the grenades she can throw at him calling him Racist for questioning Obama's legitimacy under the Constitution but framing it as a Racist Demand.

However, that might be a very big handicap Mr. Trump is shall I say being set up- let me explain. If it's a question of eligibility Mr. Trump is referring to in saying "Mr. Obama was born in the U.S." , he could be hamstrung if he wins and challenges say anything Obama ever signed like Obamacare, which would technically be a moot piece of paper without a qualified President's Signature on it.

I don't think Mr. Trump dug that trench too deep with his comment, however it did seem 'defensive' to what Hillary Clinton was assuming on the Offense, "He owes Obama and America an apology". Truth is Obama is the fringe when collectively looking at the other 43 Presidents qualifications. 42 of them were indeed [natural born Citizens], or [Citizens] at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. The fringe belongs to Obama and Arthur, so I don't think Mr. Trump needs to go on the defense about questioning Obama's Birth Place, he could easily say,
 "Constitutionally speaking the question is [natural born Citizen] and since the Supreme Court hasn't ruled that Obama was eligible but rather has ducked and dived on the Principle, Obama's inherited parent citizenship from his father is Kenyan or British. Both are considered foreign from American and thus is disqualifying for the Office of President, everyone knows it".
and there is not a Constitutional Scholar in America who wouldn't shake his/her head and say "he's at least got a point there. That's the way you maintain Principle, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution like a President.

It's clear the Constitution does not make "color" a qualification for the Office of President. . Even white people can hold the Office.

While that is abundantly clear, Hillary's problem might be Functioning as a "Him" in Article I. ,Section 7, Clause 3 requirement. Because construction on the Constitution is prohibited, Hillary would actually need an Amendment specifically outlining any sex or gender in the duties of President passing legislation submitted by Congress.

It's True!


Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Statutory interpretation is the process by which courts interpret and apply legislation. Some amount of interpretation is often necessary when a case involves a statute. Sometimes the words of a statute have a plain and straightforward meaning. But in many cases, there is some ambiguity or vagueness in the words of the statute that must be resolved by the judge, but there is no ambiguity or vagueness in the word "Him" and "Her" we all know the difference.

The 15th Amendment to the Constitution granted African American men the right to vote by declaring that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
As was clearly obvious granting the right to citizens did not include women and this paved the way for the 19th Amendment.

Amendment XIX. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
This was why the 15th Amendment wasn't good enough and the 19th Amendment had to be passed.

The 14th Amendment's "Born in the U.S." granting Citizenship was never created or intended to replace the Qualifications of the Office of the President's [natural Born Citizen]. Even the Founder of the 14th Amendment said so.

“I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen; but, sir, I may be allowed to say further, that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power or color of power to say that any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States, and not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States.” John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, Architect of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, March 9, 1866 Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866), Cf. U.S. Const. XIVth Amend.
Of course considering 'of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty Obama fails. He father owed allegiance to foreign Kenya, by their law, customs and practices.
[There is no doubt that anyone born under the 14th Amendment who is not subject is a “naturalized citizen,” or just “a citizen,” as the Amendment states. They are not natural born citizens.
To further understand why this is so, is to look at the first clause carefully.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
The words “born or naturalized” are joined with the conjunction “or,” and logically an or implies either of the two are equal. What they are equal in is being a citizen. Not “a natural born citizen.” This expressly negates the idea that simple birth of a person who is “subject to the jurisdiction” confers the coveted “natural born” status. If the term “citizen” did in fact convey a “natural born” status, then who were naturalized would be considered “natural born.”
Obviously, this is not the case, as it would mean that people like Kissinger, Albright and Schwarzenegger could run for office. Clearly, the Fourteenth Amendment is not conferring “natural born” status on anyone, it only confers simple citizenship and the universal rights given to all citizens, “native born” and naturalized. In fact, several Supreme Court Cases since the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment restrict citizenship claims based on being born geographically within the United States, and bestows the coveted “natural born citizen” title to the children of citizens, while affirming simple citizenship to the children born to aliens.]

DOES HILLARY HAVE A CONSTITUTION QUALIFYING  PROBLEM HERSELF?

Un-believable, maybe stupid Hillary didn't get that taken care of while a U.S. Senator but under very direct terms no "Her" is allowed to function in Art. I. , Section 7., Clause 3.


This was featured in the new Video detailing the Trump v. Hillary Birther Debate that features both Trump and Hillary fighting for Black Votes.


Trump instead of simply stating our Civil Rights need to be protected under the Constitution, that obviously demands that the U.S. Constitution remain in tact, all of it, says "Obama was born in the U.S." end of story. Of course he didn't say Obama was a 'natural born Citizen' qualified for the Office of the President.

Well, so was an anchor baby with Foreign parents, but that's not the Qualification for the Office of President. Congress was given " naturalization" powers in the Constitution to Adopt Citizens, but the Office of President required more time in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

Video On Facebook


Congress unfortunate or not,  was not granted powers to alter Nature, but I'm sure drought stricken areas, as well Earthquake, Tornado, and Hurricane, ravaged areas of the U.S. at times wish that; as well as grieving family's for loss of life.

Jesus Christ remarkably however did show an ability to control Nature as he calmed the seas, walked on water, healed the lepers, blind, deaf, dumb, and even restored life to the dead, so we know these Laws of Nature can indeed be controlled. Congress just has not Mastered what Jesus did.

Watch Trump v. Hillary Birther Debate

Facebook Link

My Comment on OBAMA CONSPIRACY 



September 17, 2016 at 10:41 am (Quote) #

Dr. Conspiracy:
[It pains me how mainstream the topic of birtherism has become.]

CRJ Comment
Believe it or not Doc, I feel the same way. 50 days and a wake-up before the Election, Hillary goes for the Divide America card… knowing if she can get every black and brown Vote, she Wins, for she’ll get a few White Votes and it’s enough to win.

That really is indicative of Hillary seeing she can gain an advantage by framing Trump in everyone’s mind as “Racist”.

You probably heard about falling into the pit you dug? Hillary wants to go there , “she” might open up a bigger Pandora s Box then “she” reckoned.

Of course it will take some TIME to Amend the Constitution for “Her” as “she” wasted so much time as a U.S. Senator, instead of paving “Her” way.

I personally think trying to address a Constitutional Qualification for the Office of President as a “color” issue is racist passive aggressive politicing, but it’s obviously a fav of Hillary Clinton and Trump is starring the reality of winning in the face. He’s obviously striking a cord with Poverty in the inner cities which is why Hillary went Birther.. again.

As a service to our mutual communities ..

WOW! WATCH THE TRUMP v. HILLARY BIRTHER DEBATE Who do you think won?

Never was about Color for me, it’s about CivilRights and our Constitution. It’s about coming together in our diversity Blacks, Brown, White under the Banner of the United States Supreme Law of the Land and celebrating HillaryClinton is not even authorized to Act in the Office of President.

CONGRESS has some work to do in Amending the U.S. Constitution if “She” wants to be able to function in the Office of President.

Watch, Read, and Listen to this. It’s the Law.

YouTube Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hllP2puRMhw

Facebook Link

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1283650798336367&id=510896692278452

End Comment.

I would sure like to take the time and thank everyone who has stopped in here at my humble little blog. I appreciate you taking the time and am honored by what you have given to me. Thank you.
Thank you for the 375,000 Views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com !


CRJ

WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP! Exposing corruption is not easy and as someone  who has standing to stand up in this type of Government Corruption Cody Robert Judy still needs your help.


Help Us Now  Contribute to the Campaign!
CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!























No comments:

Post a Comment