Why Hillary's Excuses for Privacy, Don't Exempt Her from Treason

FEATURED EDITORIAL- THE POST & EMAIL
Why Hillary's Excuses for Privacy, Don't Exempt Her from Treason

There has been a volume written on Hillary Clinton's partial release of emails, but at the heart of the issue as the people see it is the "Deterioration of Trust". We along with Hillary agree in hind site it would have been better to use two different devices: one for work, and one for personal. It wasn't too much to expect with a job so important as Secretary of State that is of course dealing with sensitive issues and top secret material on a daily basis.

My feelings are that in any discrepancy like this Hillary's Choice not to use two devices in hind site, should not be the American Peoples loss. Indeed, Hillary was in that office when the Government seized upon General Petraeus's Scandal. As it happened in that, when he wouldn't tow the line, this information became public very fast by the FBI. They knew he and is fling were using the same email account. He would leave a draft email she then would log on and find and visa-a-versa to communicate.

This type of collaboration could very easily have been happening just as easily with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton but she insist that we are understanding and trusting of her judgement to throw away and delete personal emails from Government Emails. Her choice to involve her personal email server in Government work is tantamount to losing her privacy in the concerns of treason.

In fact, we also have her in Office admitting the Clinton Foundation has taken money deemed unethical by the Obama Administration from Foreign Nations. The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position and destroying evidence of her Family's Foundation while she's in office when it involves foreign nations is something we should TRUST was not done especially given the revealed donations and contributions of foreign nations deemed unethical by her boss at the time Obama.

Wednesday, the Republican National Committee released a biting video of Obama stating foreign money was "a threat to our democracy." and Mrs. Clinton was standing and smiling next to a few Middle East Leaders. March 7th was the Saturday before and former President Bill Clinton was defending 'their' acceptance of and resuming of foreign funds.

He said being interviewed by comedian Larry Wilmore, "“We do get money from other countries and some of them are in the Middle East,” he said. “For example, the U.A.E. gave us money. Do we agree with everything they do? No, but they are helping us fight ISIS, and they built a great university with NYU.” Similarly, he said, “Do I agree with all the foreign policy of Saudi Arabia? No.” But he said that country is making advances in education for women and girls."

This is tantamount to admitting their Foundation was involved in a Foreign War and the treasury was being built up for it. How does that preclude the Clinton's out of office from the Logan Act violations? There were some foreign donations accepted while she was Secretary of State and it is hard to believe that these contributions don't have an email trail leading directly to Clinton's Email Server.

An erosion of trust has taken place with the circumstantial evidence involving highly classified material and our Governments position in foreign affairs. As the dollars to run for President are gobbled up by folks who are actually either not qualified for President like Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio as Obama did in the 2008 and 2012 elections, are we to assume no finance what-so-ever has taken place for a Hillary Clinton run at the Office of the President?

As readily as oil and a stash of cash is sold, the evidence points to American Elections coming dangerously close to being financed by foreign money and in that process a huge disparity exist towards Candidates not positioned as closely as Mrs. Clinton is to it as well as a compromise of our American Republic.

"If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars."

This is not just about Hillary's Email, involvement with foreign contributions, or running a shadow war. The suggestion that Hillary is protecting herself from Obama in what she calls her choice in hind sight that would have better served the American Public with one phone for Government and one for her Personal Use, is Hillary Clinton may have information on that server that holds Obama as ineligible in the Office of the President. Remember, she was one of the original Birthers? Now if that proves to be the case and she has not confided it to a Judge as I've asked her to write an Amicus Curiae several times in Tweets to her reported on this blog, then she makes herself very vulnerable to the follow up: Whomever "Shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known to one of the Judges of the United States shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason"

Its no secret Bill Clinton was reported as stating Barack Obama was not eligible to serve as President and that they would release evidence to this when the time was right.
Video Here: DID BARACK OBAMA CAMPAIGN THREATEN CLINTONS


CONSERVATIVES SUPPORT OF CAMPAIGN FOR A RESTORATION OF TRUST


This leads me finally to a very important letter I penned as a comment to PolitiChics.com in a comment made in their article under 'The Lawless President' by Posted On Mar 11 2015 By : Pamela Anne that up to this point has not been published and is in Review. Ann-Marie Murrell is a FB Friend of mine and she is the CEO/Editor-in-Chief of PolitiChicks.com so I also sent her private message of the comment apologizing for a few spelling and grammar errors made by spell check with a mind of its own. (smile)

THE LAWLESS PRESIDENT
http://www.politichicks.com/2015/03/audio-lawless-president-prevails/
OPEN COMMENT
're: My Comment
This article was fantastic! "So by way of our passiveness and ignorance, we permitted them to soldier our children, dumbing them down to become either passive compliants like ourselves, or evangelists for Marxism with no critical thinking skills to protect themselves or our union.", Nailed it!

As the only Presidential Candidate in America on record in U.S. Federal Courts , with a bi-partisan stand against Sen. McCain, and Sen. Obama in '08, '12,'13,'14 , the latest 14-4136 U.S. Tenth Circuit , for the 'natural born Citizen' qualification (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) , you can't imagine the sadness I feel for being so totally ignored by Conservatives about such a vitally important subject principle for the safety and interest of our children in national security.

I'm so heart broken at the seeming non-chalance and lack of Courage from groups like CLC, and CPAC for this antibiotic of division and racism in our Country based so incongruently on the fact I have not been elected before.
The qualifications for President do not include being elected to lower offices first like Gov. Scott Walker, nor do they include being economically rich like Dr. Carson which I think showed amazing Trust by our Framers and Founders in looking at the heart rather than the outward appearances.

The articles here at PolitiChics I think are outstanding and I admire the Editor and my FB Friend Ann Marie Murrell. I read them with joy in my heart for Freedom and Liberty, but also with a tear of sadness in the requisite state of our Nation, and the abandoned critically important Principle outlined in our Constitution regarding the great amount of work I've done and taken a stand for.

My book "Taking A Stand - the conservative Independent voice " is a Triumphant Blast for conservatism and our Constitution but has less then 50 sales at Barnes & Noble.

This site provides an excellent vision of why the Democratic Party is failing. In just the last 4 articles that is very clear, but I do fear the Republicans might be wasting the last Golden Opportunity in not calling for congressional hearings on the Ineligibility of Barack Obama.

As conservative principles go, it is difficult to find a deeper rooted one than the National Security fence of the two generation American loyalty clause unique to the Office of the President understood as "natural born Citizen".
No central feature of our Constitution over-run points so clearly to a poress border, socialist takeover of health care, great piracy on the treasury, an escalation of arming ISIS, Leaving weapons behind in Iraq, a treatise with Iran and works terror organizations whilst at the same time a Domestic triangulation of ammunition, and a erroneous tax payer finance of a Country within a Country.

It is true, Birthers haven't won anything. I know that the fight has been long, hard, and drought stricken in finance. However, the Principle is very strong! It is deep rooted and clearly R's and D's feel it too disastrous to uphold. The consequence of not upholding it though appears rooted in the demise of our Nation!
Racism has been the Claim for not upholding it, but that is only as good as keeping me swept under the carpet because I have standing as a Pres. Candidate and sued McCain first in Las Vegas NV, U.S. District Court.

How can my stand against Obama be called Racist? It can't! Yet, no one will write about it, no one will have me speak about it. Being too BIG to Fail? Having so many implicated in corrupt government practices or inaction.. Excuse .. Obfuscation.. doesn't necessarily mean the Country will not topple because 1 persons stand for Justice was swept under the carpet, but we sure are seeing 1 persons tactic of nefarious intent for our Country demonize and ruin it.

If 1 person can do so much damage, why can't 1 person do so much good? All the damage Obama does only provides more evidence to me how important the qualification principle of natural born Citizen is and was-Divinely inspired .
While R's hypothesize on how to undo what Obama has done, but deny the Power of the Divinely Inspired, how successful do you think God will let them be? In terms familiar to Christians, that's like acknowledging a form of godliness but denying the Power.

Its a gamble and bad bet to underestimate Obama and the ability of Republicans short of an Ineligibility impeachment Trial to stop him. Caught up in the devils trap refusing to call upon God for deliverance doesn't make a bit of scence. The outcome is also being over come.

Thank you for your tireless work on conservative issues.

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate U.S. Pres '08, '12, '16
Follow me here.
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us

CLOSE COMMENT

With regards to People "hoping" that something in the Courts was not affected by what is happening outside the Courts, it is a real difficult balance to say that 'things happening outside the Court do not affect the justice happening inside the Courts. As an example of this I often quote the U.S. Supreme Court Decision that slavery was tolerable in Dred Scott v. Sandford .

I cite this case to help people understand how valuable their support is and how the Courts do look to what's happening in society to base many of their crucial decisions. Of course no Court of Law has entertained a single hearing in my cases of ineligibility. In deed Justice Thomas has said in open Congressional Testimony the Court is 'avoiding' the eligibility requirement under the Obama Administration.

We had millions of people in Washington DC, in fact the largest gathering protest seen in the DC Mall history with conservatives regarding TARP, but the support for a Candidate with standing who sued both McCain and Obama so as to prevail the 'racist' tag by the leftist mainstream media has been minuscule. It has clearly been as if once you got in Court people just hoped their support was not necessary because they had no part in the formulation of Justice.

Nothing could be further from the Truth in fact Justice is often and has been decided by the mob in retrospect of Obama's Reign. He did not 'earn' the position 'fair and square', he was 'given' it. Its been kind of a might-is-right mentality for a minority as if our Constitution had no respect for "individual rights". This has been a very dangerous road to travel for it is the road of discrimination towards race, gender, and of course our Constitutional Rights.

While I can only do so much there is a lot left for you to do. Our fear is shared when we see almost on a regular basis another unprecedented power grab by the Obama Administration thought previously untouchable. The play card of Republicans has been a disaster and while it may have translated into more offices won it has not translated into Principles Won but rather politics unified with the Democratic Party.

The change we need is a positive push for TRIAL on these issues as it relates to Obama's ineligibility. The implications of not doing so is basically rewarding Obama with a resolve to destroy the Country in his transformation. This is why we desperately need a restoration but it magically happening in Court is a hail Mary pass. Without the support of Patriots, it has more of a chance to fail then it does of success which is again why your support is vital in so many ways. There is a limited amount of time left to Appeal the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision en banc, and much less of a chance in the U.S. Supreme Court without a resolve to support this from conservatives across the Nation. The Choice or ball seems to be in your corner. I'm willing only if your willing, otherwise its not going to get done.

The other political move Hillary Clinton actually has in play is to support such a Campaign in Court. This would bring Democratic party Birthers out of the walls and closets. It is rumored Hillary Clinton is centrist in the Democratic ideals field and Obama does not fancy her taking over the helm because it does not fit his far left agenda. With that rumor is another she is under no less then six investigations instigated by Obama operatives leaking information to the press. If Hillary decides to fight back she may well beat Republicans to the punch and be seen as the Civil Rights Hero saving America from the grips of an unlawful unqualified ineligible person in the White House.

The lack of Conservative Support only increases the likelihood of that happening and is a huge gamble by the Republican Party with many more potential presidential candidates unqualified and ineligible than the Democratic Party in Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio. Democrats might only suffer one while Republicans have a flurry of young and vivacious men who would be the young elephants run over with a Democratic Party Stand on Art. II, Sect. I, Clause 5 defining qualifications for the Office of the President.

Cody Robert Judy





BREAKING NEWS: JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., 14-4136 RESULTS OF POLL JUST CAME IN UPDATE POST


As PROMISED: ,I said I would keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is. I received this ORDER from the Court last night about 6pm. The results of the Poll taken by the Court on a rehearing consideration was negative America. The same Court that has honored individual rights for each American to 'marry' has rejected the petition for every American to have the same applications of qualifications applied when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President in this Rehearing En Banc.

This is a deeply upsetting and nefarious discrimination and outrage America upon all of our rights. Today, the Court handed down a poll that said they were not interested in equal rights under the law. A decision that said Obama is an exception and Cody's rights do not count. This is a decision that we would equate to turning back the clock and seeing the Court adopt acceptable forms of slavery based on color. Its a day when we see the Court rolling the rights back that so many Civil Rights Leaders have fought and bled and born the stripes. A sad day for those celebrating in Selma and a reminder of the fight that still needs to be fought.

A day has come to the Court Steps that the full Court has adopted 'elite' babies and rejected those 'poor' ones in an economical and judicial hypocritical nazi eugenics outrage! The Court practice of engaging 'Individual rights' in the same behavior or activity to proceed in marriage but that deny to me the same practices in which to run a fair race for the Office of the Presidency for which they have criticized me in their adoption of hypocrisy is staggering to the Civil Mind.

The Court has repelled the advise of the United States Supreme Court that a 'natural born Citizen' was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' so advised in Minor v. Happersett and invited the reinstitution of slavery upon the heads of every minority person standing in the welfare line with such sullied discrimination. It truly is a sad day for Equal Justice in America and I just don't know if America sees what is happening or gets it? Evan those opposed to me as a Candidate for President ought to be concerned and at the very least sustaining the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President be applied equally to all Americans according to the Constitutions obvious and acknowledged responsibilities to that office.

The Order admits that the Rehearing En Banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. In other words, appointed and dependent upon their jobs from either Obama himself or Hillary Clinton's husband.

Today we see the Court refuse to do that and dishonor the Office of the President. The Court refused to honor the tradition of "Justice For All" in America, burned the pledge of allegiance of all Americans, and blew the ashes in our eyes America.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take this and report this ASSAULT upon your Constitution to the U.S. Supreme Court!
CRJ

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here