- UNDERSTANDING CHANGE - Hillary Clinton's Compromised
What Happened to Her in the U.S. Senate?
~Intro ~Hillary Clinton quit Barack Obama's Administration as Secretary of State some have said to place distance from Obama and other's have said to simply begin her 'self ' again. Why what Hillary Clinton knew and believed at one time, and perhaps even stood up for, has come to be a very important part for America to notice in her own transformation and change that is not in the best interest of this Country.
The idea that some people change after being in Washington DC is one we are all to familiar with. An unseemly transformation as the stalwart Candidate we voted for has through the battle scars in political war devolved from the barrage, suffering the inset of post traumatic political syndrome, becoming an incapable compromised person for which waging the same war is no longer possible as the strength of the warrior was spent from the valiant person we first sent.
Standing up for America under the U.S. Constitution's umbrella is not the easiest thing in the world because the risks America has been willing to take produced a reward that was not guaranteed and did not 'pay' politicians rewards for standing in line. It is not disrespectful to acknowledge our gratitude for the warrior, but also recognize that warrior simply cannot fight the war we face any more.
WE recognize a very big mistake to make that expectation on anyone. I myself have written Hillary Clinton with admiration of her principles as First Lady others thought she'd compromised by standing by her man through thick and thin.
One of the great successes of America has been the 'fresh-faced' politician whose principles as tools, clean and polished, are able to make the Stand that is required. Hillary Clinton is no longer able to carry on as strong as she once was for these principles, because they are know longer in tact under the Constitution and she is compromised. That transition took place about 2008. She'd gone from First Lady to U.S. Senator and was inching towards the nomination of the Democratic Party as a candidate for President, but those titles are short lived bridled by the Constitution's Reins on politicians.
One of the biggest reasons that WE, under our U.S. Constitution have given the Justices of the Supreme Court 'life tenure', predicated upon good behavior, is that it offered that Court the ability to fight for the Constitution's Individual rights; rising above the clamor of bully politics and resting on the laurel lake of Our Principles.
That is important to notice. Of course we require an oath of all Politicians and Judges, but also recognize the ability for corruption to compromise everyone- even the Office of the President can be compromised and our Constitution lays out procedures that are very clear outlining that circumstance in the 25th Amendment, Sect 3, and 14th Amendment Section 3 that actually allows the removal of any person who after taking an oath comes to the point referred to as a 'Disability' upon the Nation.
The circumstances of such are defined for us as: 'Engaging in insurrection', 'Rebellion' against the same Oath', or 'Giving Aid or Comfort to the enemies of the U.S.' It is this first circumstance of action I would like to address as it pertains the the Office of the President and the Qualifications contained within the Constitution we know for only one other office- that of the Vice President- as it relates to Candidates running for the Office of President. This is the Standard set up as Principle by WE the People.
- No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
Late last night I was engaged in the fight and made the following statement at Obamaconspiracy.com under the above mentioned story heading. Because it took me awhile to recall the whereabouts of links formulating the comment below, I thought it a good thing to Record under this Blog, which is really becoming an inset into the fabric of Questions about the subject 'key-stone' of our Constitution- understood as the Office of the President, the comment for you Reporters. Its easy to forget and often hard to research or to even know what to research in following stories you might have been actually to young to pay attention to. Remember 7 years ago, many Reporters now were 14 years old.
Let me notice I've provided the kick-back link to Obama Conspiracy Site if you'd like to go back and see the volatile comments made by people who have been engaged in protecting Barack Obama for the last seven years. They are covered in anonymity and I just don't feel the need to give them room here on this blog, but the link is there if you'd like to go back and research the kind of treatment that oozes out and permeates continually Obama's Administration. Its pretty rough and is not the polite scene you see on Television.
Comment:
-------
RECORD OF HILLARY’S -sharing as asked
http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/clinton_ive_crossed_commanderi.html
HC ““I believe that I’ve done that… and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.
HC ““I believe that I’ve done that… and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.
HC ” “There are certain critical issues that voters always look to in a general election. National security experience (and) the qualifications to be commander-in-chief are front and center. They always have been. They always will be,” she said.”
[What is clear from the internal documents is that Clinton’s loss derived not from any specific decision she made but rather from the preponderance of the many she did not make. Her hesitancy and habit of avoiding hard choices exacted a price that eventually sank her chances at the presidency. What follows is the inside account of how the campaign for the seemingly unstoppable Democratic nominee came into being, and then came apart.]
[Clinton was already under attack for an attitude of “inevitability”—the charge being that she imperiously viewed the primary process as a ratifying formality and would not deign to compete for what she felt she was owed]
[Penn also left no doubt about where he stood on the question of a positive versus negative strategy. He made the rather astonishing suggestion to target Obama’s “lack of American roots”:]
[On December 1 [2007], Clinton and her husband attended a private dinner with the influential Des Moines Register editorial board. Seated at opposite ends of a long table, they were stunned to hear journalists praise the skill and efficiency of the Obama and Edwards campaigns and question why Clinton’s own operation was so passive .. On the next morning’s staff conference call, Clinton exploded, demanding to know why the campaign wasn’t on the attack.]
“Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States,” declares the resolution co-authored by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri.
The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
” Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread.”
The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
” Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18web-hulse.html?pagewanted=print
[The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. ]
[The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. ]
Rickey: Hillary Clinton was on record as saying that U.S. Sen Res 511 would probably not stand Constitutional scrutiny and or was flimsy to paraphrase her statement.
The last two refer to what I was talking about as far as a paraphrase of Clinton about U.S. Sen. Res 511 the quote speaking about all the ‘authors’ that might be considered co-sponsors and their input and feelings.
------What is important to recognize that you can collect from the Links provided and the dialogue together as a citation considered as a whole is that Hillary Clinton recognized as well as Barack Obama that there was a jeopardy of Constitutional Principle at stake which if it had its perfect way would have prevented both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama from even using the bathroom in the White House let alone being Commander-in-Chief.
The reason this is important is because it shows us clearly not only the line that was crossed, but the knowledge that those crossing the line had and attributed with accrediting or identifying their own efforts.
"Of course, the authors (speaking of those co-sponsoring U.S. Senators who very well can be accredited with helping formulate words with suggestions and applications of intent and spirit of reasoning, as well as actually the ones getting the credit for writing U.S. Senate Resolution 511 out in long hand), acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain's eligibility hanging by a legal thread. "Put plainly as we consider Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as co-sponsors of McCain's U.S. Senate Resolution 511, they knew it did not hold the power of an Amendment to the Constitution which must be passed by 2/3rds of Congress (Both Houses) and signed by a Qualified President to gain the devoted loyalty of the Judicial Branch or United States Supreme Court.
Author Mrs. McCaskell had originally penned S. 2678 which had failed, compromising the understanding that a natural born Citizen be '[b]orn in the United States to Citizen Parents', giving it to to those born abroad to military personnel. Again, that failed. I 've always thought it should have because it is a well known fact not everyone in the military can run for President anyway due to age restrictions and time in the U.S. as well as not being a 'natural born Citizen'. That is nothing new.
The authors and co-sponsors went back to the drawing board and made it personal to Sen. McCain with which the colleagues or good ole boys of the U.S. Senate good rally behind as they understood it was not a Constitutional Amendment.
Just as easily noted the Judicial Branch through the highest Court is not required to uphold a 'message' from the United States Senate written on a yellow sticky pad, over and above the Constitution of the United States of America properly ratified and respected by The People and all their Representatives in Principle that is encoded in our Constitution. To do so not only represents bad behavior but is laying the grounds for impeachment of that life tenure job.
U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was the all important point of compromise of the Constitution made by those [C]andidates for President who were simply mad at the Constitution prohibiting any members in their chambers from becoming President. That's what it was. They were all pouty and mad about it because in that Chamber (U.S. Senate) first generation Americans are welcome to be elected to it.
The Office of the President has by its definition in the Constitution welcomed a pure or non-foreign 2nd American Generation requirement of time. This is understood by the time it takes for a first generation Americans to have children here who are then eligible for the Office of the President. That requirement is what 'natural born Citizen' meant and that is backed up by history, tradition, and legal precedent.
The authors including Clinton and Obama recognized this and stated that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was at best a little thread that had no weight of enforcement under the Constitution as Amendments do, and that if put to the test under Court scrutiny it would simply be cut up. They could not justify that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 had any validity or standing in a Court of Law represented by in the Judicial Branch. That's why they all recognized and 'acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread'.
That's how flimsy they thought and knew it was in 2008 prior to the Election. Now with Barack Obama occupying the Office stampeding around the world on Air Force One as a power nutted minion and a walking talking violation of the Constitution, some how the Media is trying to justify what amounts to a Constitutional insurrection.
At least Claire McCaskill attempted to propose legislation on changing the 'natural born Citizen' clause to mean something different than what it did mean. Can we offer any of that same respect towards U.S. Senator Ted Cruz or how about U.S. Senator Marco Rubio? We can not. They have not legally proposed through their respective offices any such official proposals in their offices and instead are endeavored to just 'wipe out' the Constitution without Civil Order. That my friends is insurrection in their elected Offices.
In fact they are engaged in using the Funds contributed to them for their U.S. Senate Races for their Campaign races as President. Side note: ( lets' just say for argument sake they are legal U.S. Citizens for the Office of a Senator. I know there is debate now even on that with Sen. Cruz officially having to denounce his Canadian Citizenship after he was elected a U.S. Senator and I'm sure he didn't represent himself as a Canadian in his Campaign while running for U.S. Senate which could be seen as a fraud and a different outcome imagined quite easily).
So, if you "use" the funds collected in a Campaign Race you were legal in, to support and sustain a new Campaign for which you are illegal, you are in the business of laundering money in an illegal operation. That Folks, is insurrection for the purposes of usurpation of the Office of the President and its got to STOP!
This is why noticed in another Comment in Debate on the above mentioned site Clueless Cruz Comments-Hillary Started the Birther Movement;, Obama was creating his own loophole, not McCains'.
-----
CRJ July 10, 2015 at 9:01 am (Quote) #
That’s because McCain had the same problem.
“Obama said: “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”
Calling the qualifications in the Constitution for the Office of President “a loophole” is exactly what they had to figure out how to jump through.
” The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specified a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”
Democrats knew McCain wasn’t qualified either, but they needed Republicans to get through that loophole Obama was going to need. This is nothing knew, but trying to say there was opposition from “Inside” the D’s or “Outside” from R’s is really sounding like a denial of the facts.(references to there comments made)
” SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by D-McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”
On April 18, 2008, the New York Times concluded that the eligibility issue could only be resolved by a Constitutional amendment, but confirmed the political fait accompli.
“Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said D- Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”
Quotes:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
----
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
----
Of course I respect women, their right to Choose, to be treated fairly, but I do not respect the reversal role of 'sexism' to gain the Office of the President over and above simply defending the 'principles of the Constitution'. If America has devolved into 'voting' for those who have stood in line with a different physical character trait on the outside, then they have devolved into a Nation of discrimination that does not honor the character of Spirit inside the person who is to be in the Office of the President. I would not have a chance under those circumstances nor do I believe the Nation would survive such, so it wouldn't matter. I wouldn't be losing anything worthwhile.
SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS LEFT - SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS RIGHT
Not only am I the only Candidate in America who has a bi-partisan Federal Court Record fighting for the Office of the President and the Constitution I am the only one left still standing in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I am also right on the principle being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents'.
While I fight and scrap every day for American to look beyond physical characteristics I implore you to join me and support the fight that is right- Judy v. Obama 14-9396- while it can still be fought for by a warrior who is not compromised.
By supporting Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 you help protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Please, help him with a Contribution Today at his safe and secure PAYPAL Contribution Link Here.
Part II. Link Here
Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI