WAR ON THE POOR EXPLODES IN CONGRESS
BREAKING NEWS: WAR ON THE POOR
RESOLUTION INDICTMENTS SOUGHT BY 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE on ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!!!
2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy is asking both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to pass RESOLUTIONS in their respective bodies that would indict all of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in affect for what he pleads is effectively the worst case scenario on Justice For All - A WAR ON THE POOR.
The following RESOLUTION is being asked to be circulated by every Citizen upon his/her Representative and Senator as the General Public of CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES to every U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative in Congress for the Individual States.
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easy E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator.
Please Submit the following RESOLUTION to the HOUSE Judiciary Committee- Constitution and Civil Courts Subcommittee as well as the SENATE Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee- Constitution
IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court
WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty
WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8
WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15
WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR
WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.
WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.
WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR
BE IT RESOLVED
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
END
AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT:
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!
U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY- Subcommittee-Constitution and Civil Justice
OPINION
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.
It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration.
Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this:
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality?
There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.
Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water?
Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as 'prosecutorial discretion'.
Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?
I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me.
Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?
No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End.
Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?
Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.
" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.
"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also. "
REP. TRENT FRANKS CHAIR
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch
U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution
SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR
R.M Sen. Durbin
Members:
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter
OPINION
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.
It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration.
Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this:
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality?
There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.
Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water?
Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as 'prosecutorial discretion'.
Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?
I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me.
Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?
No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End.
Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?
Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.
" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.
"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also. "
Thank You!
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS
No comments:
Post a Comment