BREAKING NEWS: HOW COULD SAME SEX MARRIAGE BE THE KISS OF DEATH FOR OBAMA'S W.H. OCCUPANCY IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT?

BREAKING NEWS: HOW COULD SAME SEX MARRIAGE BE THE KISS OF DEATH FOR OBAMA'S W.H. OCCUPANCY IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT?

Among the hardest conundrums for Prophets and People alike to understand, though they recognize it in front of their own tenants of faith in extremist example that murder is wrong, but killing in defense of ones self, family, or even your Country's defense in the line of duty is right, is that with every action under the sun one can be justified by God's Mercy and the other be damned. So it is with the 'natures' of men that God has given them and for us all to seek to understand; for unrighteous judgments are among the greatest stumbling blocks of mankind's history within all the generations of time.

DIFFERENT RELIGIONS and BELIEFS

Yesterday our Nation faced a crossroads of epic proportions in that the United States Supreme Court tread upon the State's Rights of the Tenth Amendment to protect the Liberty of the 14th Amendment in the interest of Liberty. For that word I was moved with joy and celebration in the actions of the Court. It was in the interest of Liberty that the Lord sought to recover Israel through his Prophet Moses from the chains of Egypt's Pharaoh and in the next instant begin to weed out those whose progress was 'stopped' because of their lack of Faith in the actions of suffering those to die who would not look upon the 'idol' to be saved from the serpents sting Moses held up, choosing to die instead in their "conservatism", as well those who wondered in the 'conservative' desert until the generation whose Faith had not been sufficient had passed away who were forbidden to enter into the Promised Land. Any who would not say that the Lord in some instances is 'progressive' and in some instances is 'conservative' is really missing the examples of this Story in History.

I sense people wanting a more modern day story. Ok, here's one I am familiar with in the United States of America among a people who are a very small minority but are no less famous to the world. Why would a man of devout love for God whose most famous work he never purported to author but to translate in The Book of Mormon (B.O.M) institute in the religion of Mormonism "Polygamy" that has come to be known as one of its most famous tenants after seeing this verse found in B.O.M. Jacob Ch. 3 vs. 5,9
" Behold, the Lamanites your brethren, whom ye hate because of their filthiness and the cursing which hath come upon their skins, are more righteous than you; for they have not forgotten the commandment of the Lord, which was given unto our father - that they should have save it were one wife, and concubines they should have none, and there should not be whoredoms committed among them. v.9 Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, which is the word of God, that ye revile no more against them because of the darkness of their skins; neither shall ye revile against them because of their filthiness; but ye shall remember your own filthiness, and remember that their filthiness came because of their fathers."

Joseph Smith Jr., the translator of this verse is recognized as having had 40 wives according to a story published in the New York Times Nov. 10 2014. This is an example of what people get hung up on in a cross over of doctrine simply understood to be the Lord's wisdom of giving more to those who are ready, and taking some from those who are not ready. We all know as Christian's Joseph Smith was not the first to be called to take on more than one wife or concubine and that many large "P" prophets were given the direction in the Old Testament including Abraham, Moses, David, and Solomon. All precious sons of the Lord and those whom he called as being men after his own heart.

The Governor of Utah Gary R. Herbert wrote on his Facebook Page yesterday June 26th,2015 "Marriage, as defined by the people of Utah, has been redefined, first by the federal courts and today the outcome of that decision has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. I am disappointed with the decision by the court to usurp state authority and overrule the voice of the people of Utah as demonstrated by legislation with regard to marriage. I am also very concerned with the overwhelming trend to diminish state autonomy. I believe states should have the right to determine their own laws regarding marriage. Clearly, the majority of the justices disagree and their decision provides finality with respect to the law."

The rich history among the Native Americans marriage between what was termed "Two-Spirited" people were performed among other things as a sign of peace, protection, and and harmony from other tribes aggression.

The Bible as a standard many people refer to in diverse Christian Faiths also recognized those who were of a cross over between male and female with an attraction of same sex called "Eunuch". These were a class of emasculated men attached to the Courts of eastern rulers. They were employed to watch over the harems, and also were often given positions as trusted officials. See Bible 2 Kings 20:18;Isa 39:7 & 56:4; Jer. 38:7-13 & 41:16; Matt. 19:12; Acts 8:27-38. Let me just quote Matthew 19:12 as it recognizes that the differing natures of men can come from birth which many who call themselves Christians have not accepted yet even though it is in the New Testament and they often dismiss the Old Testament as invalid.
Mathew 19:12 " "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom for heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."

WHY SHOULD CHRISTIANS BE UPSET ABOUT THE SCOTUS DECISIONS TO ALLOW MARRIAGES TO ANY CITIZEN?

The dissenting Minority opinions of the SCOTUS came from Justices Roberts,Scalia,Alito,and Thomas. The ratifying opinions of the Majority came from Sotomeyer, Kagan, Ginsburg,Breyer, and Kennedy. From the NY Times Article by Adam Liptack June 26th, 2015 "Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide", some poignant parts of the opinions are made from both sides.

Probably the biggest fear I've seen expressed on social media's is that many Christians view this in a way that somehow this decision would "force" varying religions to actually perform same-sex marriages within their Churches irrespective of the opposing doctrine of the particular religion. I do not see that being the case at all in America. As long as the Government provides the option of a justice-of-the-peace down at the County Court house to perform marriages, I do not see any successful law suit coming against any particular church or religion that its own particular religious doctrines or creeds as well Leaders need to fear lest that Liberty also protected by the Constitution be lost. I do not think the Government can force a particular Religion to perform a marriage in the Church anymore than I could see the Government forcing Baptist to be Baptized in Mormon Temples, or Catholics who choose to sprinkle being forced to be dunked.

The assumption that any particular religion could now be sued for not performing the will of an individual negates freedom of religion and more importantly the reason there are so many differing religions all respected in America. Rather I see this 'pretended fear' as a way to simply assert a position, which now has been exposed for what it was; a farce. I have yet to see a Scripture that says in the Bible, if that's where Christians want to go, I'll go there even if the Justices feel restricted of their own rights, that "marriages" in the first place between a man and a women must be performed in a Government Institution. For the most part, I see in the canonical text "Marriages" as originating from being performed in a Church.

Has it not been by the Christians, we call elected Leaders, that marriages wound up as a performance of a Government Institution in the first place here in America? Of course it was. If Government had instituted the requirement for Civil Unions only in Government Buildings for Tax Purposes regardless of sex, and Marriages had been kept out of the Government by those going to Church and voting for such, would there be "Marriages" being performed between two of the same sex? The answer to that question is "No". So where is this "un-righteous judgement" coming from that would deny Citizens equality of the same Liberty referred to in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution? I say it doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The Court can only rule upon Cases brought to it. The Court can't for instance say, ""Civil Unions" should be performed in the Government Eye, and "Marriages" should be performed in the Church Leg." Now the Legislative Branches could have said that and passed laws in that direction. As it has been the Case, your Legislatures refused to do that because they didn't want to do it themselves between their own spouses of the opposite sex. They wanted a combination to exist and in that combination a 'tradition' and 'norm' of imposing 'marriage' outlines and now you might say the chicken come home to roost for all Citizens.

Page 44 of the Dissenting Opinion from Justice Roberts said: "But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.” The Federalist No. 78, p. 465 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton) (capitalization altered)."

I think a quick reminder of the 14th Amendment is important here so let me quote that and think about it in the regard that it applies to you in your circumstances as a Citizen, because if it can't be thought of that way, it serves no purpose whatsoever in the first place: plus I don't think even Government Leaders read the Constitution enough.
United States Constitution Amendment 14 Section I.:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws."

Now if marriage is not a privilege, there would be no age restriction among the states to it. If "Liberty" was not among the characteristics of circumstances in Marriage and were not defined as ones choice to create unions in intercourse, prearranged marriages would still be the 'norm' and would be enforced regardless of an individuals' 'desire' or 'feelings'. Parents would be making the choice to whom their children would marry, rather than their children making that choice.

From Page 33 of the decision: "No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right."

Thus, I see Justice John Roberts assertion on page 68 opposing Justice Kennedy and the four justices who ruled that liberty and privileges include marriage under being a Citizen of the United States: ["Celebrate the decision if you favor it, he says in the concluding lines of the dissent [ON PAGE 68]. “But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”], not to be based in the reality of Liberty and Citizenship 'privileges' as if there are none that don't have to do with being prosecuted.
Read other Post Cody Robert Judy has written on the Same Sex Marriage Issue here here and here

IN TOTALITY OF THE DECISION WE SEE A WIN FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AS AN AMERICAN NATION

The rights we have as individual Citizens has indeed made the United States of America one of the richest Country's of the world, some might say the envy of the world when it comes to the protections of ones life, liberty, and property. Of course there are other country's who have moved in that direction, but the Case for the United States can hardly be excluded in their own decisions of modern history to balance both conservatism and progressive-ism in a balance of Justice.

We are witness to "Old Judgments" as well as "New Judgments". We are witness to "New Judgments" being right replacing old judgments that were wrong all along. We are also witness to Old Judgments being right yesterday, today, and tomorrow just as Jesus Christ has claimed all along. Hebrews 13:8 "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, today, and forever."

Hebrews 13:4 Reminds Also: "Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: ", meaning be true to your oaths that you take with your partners in marriage regardless of gender.

The "Individual's Rights" are an essential part of respecting my own rights as a Presidential Candidate in my petition to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, that contends my rights to run a fair race for President with the qualifications enumerated within the Constitution's bounds that the Office of the President devolve upon none other than a 'natural born Citizen', have been infringed by Obama and the DNC through their representatives also named in the action.

I have declared damages to my Campaign and Person that the 14th Amendment was not created nor did it diminish the requirements in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. that only a 'natural born Citizen' can be President, unless he was a 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. This gives great cause in exposing wither the Justices who decided in favor of Same-Sex Unions are true to their own words of respect towards "individuals" in "equality" and "liberty" under the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President.

Many court opinions state that if or when two aspects of the Constitution are in conflict, both must be given diligence. What that means is that 'natural born Citizen' can not be dismissed or diluted to the course of the qualifications for Representatives or Senators which is "Citizen". You can not do that. The 14th Amendment includes 'Citizens' to be anyone who is born reflecting only one aspect of 'natural born Citizen' which means "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" according to the Minor v. Happersett Case I have depended upon for relevance and precedent.

In that opinion it is stated,"it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners"- meaning to the other circumstances of Citizen there are doubts that they were not meant to be qualified to be President or Vice President, as the requirement of 'natural born Citizen' exist unique for both offices. This has been dramatized by the Legislatures eight failed attempts to change the definition since 2003.

The fact that these have failed is a witness to the Court my definition asserted since 2008 against McCain and Obama is right, but it remains a question the Court has not taken up from two Presidential Candidates; one opposed to the other's lack of eligibility or state of ineligibility.

It is also a challenge to the dissenting Justices of the Court's recent opinion that this is not found in the Constitution, for it truly is with much greater emphasis then that of Marriage. Article II, Section I, Clause 5 states even the time frame for which 'natural born Citizen' is required and that is after those who were "Citizens" at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution'
Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5 - "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE NEWS UPDATE

JUNE 18th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court held a Conference on my case and placed it in the "Pending Motions List" of the Court which meant my Case was not denied until the pending motions were taken care of. At issue was the informa pauperis status that I had claimed and the Court Denied.

The argument I have made for the Court to RECONSIDER THIS MOTION can be seen here and the news is that this now has indeed been placed on the Docket of the United States Supreme Court June 24th as is pictured.

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D, and VA., now. Thank You!
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

The OBAMA aka BARRY SOETORO Party in the United States Supreme Court Altering PRECEPTION

The acid reflex button is churning in America between the political parties of the Republicans and Democrats with the Presidential Candidacies of Rubio, Cruz and Jindal and of course Obama as illegal. Its like an illegal substance has been distributed to everyone in the room, everyone's got a stash, everyone's smoking it experiencing the high of an altered ego or the Constitutional Perception of Reality.

Both parties are cooking our Liberty in a microwave, from the inside out. Of course if there is no Law, the altered reality of the party scene goes on. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is the last chance for a normalcy, a Constitutional Reset Button. To wake-up the Party so Americans can at least get a grip on hope and trust again.

That is exactly what the United States Supreme Court was designed for you know. The greatest watchdog of liberty and respected authority of the Constitution. With the Constitution as a Standard, our individual rights protected from a bullying majority. But the Republicans and Democrats are so cooked up on illegal substances now the only thing that is going to save our Country is a Constitutional Reset Button if you will from the TOP DOWN. Support is needed for that.

Hey, I don't have anything against a good party at all. However, when it goes on and on and on those attending never have a chance to sober up and get straight. Get back to normal.. or in this Case get back to the Standard of the Constitution. Some have said after the weeks decisions of the United States Supreme Court that its evidence enough that we are just to far gone and there's to many people in high places involved and toking it up at the Barry Soetoro Party in an altered state of reality they seem bent on maintaining. When your all cooked up on pills and grass there's not a Constitutional Principle that you can't let go of. The altered dimension is enslaving and destructive all at the same time.

Did Democrats ever think that Obama would abandon them and become the favorite son of the Republicans when they elected him? This week Congress handed over all global trade authority to Obama and immigration authority to the UN while Democrats including Rep. Nancy Pelosi started scratching her head at the two certifications she signed in 2008 for Obama one of which had to be a an altered reality in order to fly. The Washington Times got a whiff of what was being lost as it pondered again,.."Can I see that birth certificate?" in the Order of finding Obama ineligible to serve and sign as the Executive Branch Chief.

The "Republican" Supreme Court stood with Obama to protect unconstitutional socialized medicine breaking the backs of middle Americans who can no longer afford it. When you have to have a $7,000 dollar deductible in the bank at all times in order to go to the Doctor its pretty much a for-gone conclusion the back of Middle America is being broken with an incentive to fall off to the poor side.

The poor simply will stay poor because they have a $7,000 dollar deductible incentive never to become middle class, ever compliments of the Barry Soetoro Party. They won't ever get the deductible and will remain on the poor side getting health insurance for free, but their American Dream is also being wiped out. Well ACA is not really free, remember its being financed by or should we say on the backs of the middle class whose ground is crumbling every day like the buffalo of Old America being run over the Cliffs to collect their hides.

Look at Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al., as it is written on the Motions and Petition as a Writ of Certiorari. The last post you can see a Motion that was delivered to the Court and here's the link for the Original Petition viewed now well over 3,000 times.

Look at how the United States Supreme Court altered the Case Heading themselves. It was altered by the Court Clerks to read Cody Robert Judy v. Barack H. Obama President of the United States. When have you ever seen the heading of a Case changed by the United States Supreme Court to read the way they liked it?

IS THE COURT LIVING IN AN ALTERED STATE OF REALITY or is it just the Clerks?

Hitting the Constitutional Reset Button and recognizing Obama was never qualified for the Office of the President by the Standards of the United States Constitution would indeed call into question everything signed and recommended by Obama, even his choice for Vice President. Think about every executive order every ACT of Congress that has been submitted to the Executive Branch for Obama's signature? This is the magnitude of Judy v. Obama 14-9396, because if it is won in the U.S. Supreme Court and Cody's Campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and 2016 are seen as Damaged by the usurpation of an Empirical Obama Reign in both the ability to get contributions and voter support by the injustice then Congress really looks foolish not to open and have a QUALIFICATION/DISABILITY IMPEACHMENT HEARING that would end Obama's Party.

How many Americans would want Obama's Party to end? How many American's are supporting a Candidate for President who has done the work at protecting our National Security, and has as a Presidential Candidate a Case to do just that in the United States Supreme Court, with all the talk and chatter going on in the Main Stream Media now about the 2016 Presidential Elections in headlines every day?

Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case is the only Case now in the United States Supreme Court that has a chance of hitting the Reset Button Americans.

Thank You for considering this, passing it on, and supporting us. Please don't expect things to get better without a Constitutional Reset. Donald Trump entering the ring as a talking Birther against those who are not Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents on one hand, and not 'doing anything' about it on the other, isn't going to work. In fact Mr. Trump, now gaining momentum in the Republican Polls, has already accepted Obama as his President. He calls Obama President almost every day.

That is the talk you should hear, and the action or record of support that counts in the job description for U.S. President if words matter. Mr. Trump has not given my Civil Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court a single dollar, its a big fat zero, and that goes for all the Republican Candidates. Trump's name recognition is also zero in the United States Supreme Court against Obama's ineligibility. Mr. Trump is very poor in this regard and Mr. Judy is much richer than Mr. Trump.

In the consideration for the Office of the President of the United States, Americans really need to consider which Bank Account really Counts. The account in preserving, protecting, and defending the United States Constitution and the biggest threat to that coming from Obama aka The Barry Soetoro Party. This was the name the man named Obama is recorded as attending High School as and he was an adopted Indonesian Citizen and portrayed himself that way according to those he attended High School with.

"Thus even the Court's interference with the heading of my Case", Judy says, "is an altering of identity, the likes of which are fraudulent to the original case. Removal or alteration of identification from property, that the alteration of my Case represents for the Court as placed on the Docket as being mine, or my property, is a Criminal Offense that needs to be SPOT LIGHTED by the Main Stream Media so that the Justices see it. Its just not right and goes right along the lines of allowing Obama to commit fraud upon the American People with a fabricated long form birth certificate and draft registration as well as the problems highlighted with numerous other forms of identification with Obama that have never had a hearing in the Judicial or Legislative Branches of our Government on the merits.

"This morning my six year old son asked me "Daddy, what really come first- The Chicken or the Egg? As I pondered the question he sincerely asked. I said the body was created first out of the dust of the ground. Genesis Ch.2 v. 7. It was after the body was created and was still lifeless then that God breathed the breath of life into the body. I said, "The Chicken" that then was given the ability to lay eggs. (smile)

"As I thought about that it came to me, what comes first "Justice" or "Popularity". Without Justice I am a failed Presidential Candidate. If the Justices hear my Case and side with my damages claimed with the accident Obama caused with a lie, then of course I receive popularity. This is why I have asked the Justices to consider my Case. I have asked them in my last Motion; Why is it that Justice can't come first?

"How can you assume that without justice my campaigns having been subject to corruption and injustice can gain popularity? Why can't Justice be a gauge of Character and Popularity in a Campaign for President in America? Those supporting that immoral character of injustice according to the Standard of the Constitution are gaining the popularity because Justice is being covered up. That has got to stop for a change. Our Nation needs the Constitutional RESET BUTTON to be hit and its nothing but Justice on a bi-partisan or tri-partisan consideration with 43% of Americans represented and registered as Independents according to a Gallup Poll January 2015."

We would like to remind all of you who are just joining us that are thrilled with the SCOTUS Case and wanting to support it. The reminder is that without Cody Robert Judy's presidential runs in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 being in existence that there is no difference between the Cases that were all dismissed by the Court before. This is the STANDING LAW that is so very important. We reiterate this based on those who would dismiss Cody's run for President as not vitally important to the success in the United States Supreme Court and we would encourage your support for him as he has largely had to bare this burden with his own finances over the last 6 years, which has put him in the place of informa pauperis standing. Cody didn't start out that way and the action in 2008 Judy v. McCain as far as the Court Fees were 'paid'.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D, and VA., now. Thank You!

The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Petitioner and Candidate for President in Obama INELIGIBILITY Case Fights for the POOR and JUSTICE!

UPDATE: 6-25-15 Noon - SCOTUS RECEIVES MOTION Recon for Review - DETAILS
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Petitioner and Candidate for President in Obama INELIGIBILITY Case Fights for the POOR and JUSTICE!

In a mighty leap today, the Cody Robert Judy for President Camp, laid bare before all the foul charge of the United States Supreme Court that Mr. Judy fails the 'informa pauperis standing' he had sought from the Court six weeks ago, that the Court sat on from March 30th until the June 18th, 2015 CONFERENCE hearing, filing a "MOTION FOR A IFP (informa pauperis) RECONSIDERATION REVIEW" that was expedited overnight express mail and should be in the U.S. Supreme Court tomorrow morning!

"The totality of INJUSTICE is laid bare before the American Pubic in this flagrant foul upon the poor seeking justice", Judy said, with his Motion for Reconsideration Review. " I feel I've got to try to stand up for the poor" Mr. Judy said, "because even Donald Trump isn't giving a dollar for the cause of the Constitution. I personally tweeted him asking for help two days ago on the printing cost of upward of $2,000 after hearing him brag that his net worth was 9 Billion in his announcement for President of the United States. Not a word back folks. That should tell you something. The Rich Republicans are fat cats that do not give two cents for the Constitution or Justice just like Mitt Romney ignored this central national security issue in the election of 2012 and lost because of it."

Mr. Judy expressed great sympathy for the poor who suppose that fat-cat Democratic Party contenders like Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton, who was also given two personal tweets from Mr. Judy to file an Amicus Curiae, or friend of the Court Brief in defense of the United States Constitution in this Case over a month ago she refused, stated, "she obviously isn't interested in helping the poor, defending the Constitution or preserving the Union of the United States of America in this central defense of the United States Constitution, striking at the core of our Nation and Sovereignty.

"People you have got to understand that they are selling you out, farming you out, pimping you like slave traffickers of the People. They don't care what color you are. They don't care if your middle income, or low income, all they care about is that they are insulated from the greatest and most successful Supreme Law this Nation has risen from becoming by it the Leader of the World in many fields of industry. Their actions tell you they HATE the Constitution of the United States of America. My actions tell you I love it! I am fighting for you and this Nation from these blood sucking vamps who call themselves politicians swearing oaths to the great Constitution, and then winking and uncrossing their fingers as they step off the stage."

"If you would be free men you have got to join me in this Campaign Fight. You have got to dig in and stand up like free men. You have got to believe in JUSTICE, believe in LIBERTY, believe in FREEDOM, believe in the American Dream again! If you don't believe in these things no one is going to believe in you. I believe you can stand up and be counted in the Liberty and Freedom this Nation offers in opportunity! I believe you are wonderful, beautiful people that God Loves and does not want to see sold into slavery again."

"My heart is grieved that Obama after the lust of his own heart has sacrificed you on the altar for his gain and glory without repaying you the service of the Constitution, which has provided to you the vehicle to become a great place in this world! With and by his actions he seeks to drive you into a dark abyss and the Republicans you see cheering him on are no different. Look at his witness to you. A forged long form birth certificate, a forged draft registration, and my Case in the United States Supreme Court lays bear all his FRAUD upon the Republic for which we stand!

"Please join us today in the call to RESTORE this Nation. We have got to clean the inner vessel first and then look to see what help we can be to the World. RESTORE our own Example as a Standard and beacon of hope for Justice for all. "

The following is the MOTION FOR A IFP (informa pauperis) RECONSIDERATION REVIEW, that Mr. Judy, Petitioner in the Judy v. Obama/ aka Barry Soetoro et.al, Case No. 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court filed today. His hope is that the Court will grant it, and GRANT Certiorari before the Court Summer Recess so that when it comes back in October his Case will have Hearing.

Mr. Judy spared no expense on getting this Motion to the Court overnight spending $25 dollars in the highest overnight guarantee available because the Court is set to recess the end of June reconvening in October. Mr Judy noticed the sabotage of Justice is no way to win a Court case, noticing that the United States Constitution does not require in the Office of the President and certain level of "Net Worth", "Family Name", or "Previously elected Office of Government" and the qualifications are to be 35 Years of age, at least 14 years a resident, and a 'natural born Citizen' unless you were a 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

If our Nation can't get the basic requirements of the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President right in the first place, its a little like getting the horse before the cart and its not Mr. Judy whose not paying attention to the base or trunk of the tree, its elected Politicians representing themselves out flying on the tips of the limbs.

We here at the CRJ Camp hope you will see the reality of distress our Nation is in and the call for Justice that is so necessary as Mr. Judy has cited to: "RESTORE America today for a Better America Tomorrow."

The height of injustice is seen when those who are poor cannot even get into Court and are treated arbitrarily unworthy of Justice. This cannot be allowed to stand. Mr. Judy cannot do this by himself. He needs your help and believe it or not you need his. He is fighting unlike any other Political Candidate for President for you in this Case. It is the central focus of the entire Constitution of the United States, our National Security and that includes our Sovereignty and civil rights as American Citizens rather then subjects.

We have noticed more people becoming aware they just can't sit back and watch this case or its going to be lost. Once it is lost it cannot be restored. This case is the last stand for Justice and it was certainly not easy to get here. Americans can't just sit by and watch squandering the inheritance of those who have died on the battle fields for their liberty and freedom giving all for their chance and not expect that it would be taken away if not defended. They have got to get involved in the order of restoring this Nation as a beacon of hope and Justice for the world to see but they need a sincere leader with a proven track record to articulate and do it. One who has lead by example, and not coward from the fight.

Mr Cody Robert Judy is the man who has the record of action upon both Republicans and Democrats who have scoffed at the treasure of the Constitution. Who have not seen it as the vehicle that has made our Nation great and provided the opportunity for us to become the leader in the free world. We should all be supporting his Record for Justice and the Republic for which we stand.

We would like to thank Mrs. Sharon Rondeau - Editor and Chief of The Post and Email for her timely and great care in the interview she conducted with Cody Robert Judy today also and encourage you to read "WE ARE SO CLOSE" in her article and feature today! This was also featured on the BIRTHER REPORT link here.

UPDATE: TODAY 6-25-15 NOON - We have confirmation that SCOTUS has indeed received the below detailed Motion. The details of the receiving are pictured here at 10:40AM. I think this demonstrates just how quickly a Motion can be handled lending a verification that the SCOTUS waiting 75 days or until my Conference Date of June 18th was..well, lets just say it could have been handled much faster.

The following is the MOTION FILED IN THE U.S SUPREME COURT that will be in the Court 6-25-15. Thank you for your consideration in Helping Mr. Judy in this Case. The overnight tracking number for this document is EK 559355563 US for the U.S. Supreme Court and the Priority Mail tracking number to the Solicitor General is 9505 5111 2718 5175 3996 51 .

IFP Reconsideration Review Judy v. Obama 14-9396

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D, and VA., now. Thank You!

We would like to remind all of you who are just joining us that are thrilled with the SCOTUS Case and wanting to support it. The reminder is that without Cody Robert Judy's presidential runs in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 being in existence that there is no difference between the Cases that were all dismissed by the Court before. This is the STANDING LAW that is so very important. We reiterate this based on those who would dismiss Cody's run for President as not vitally important to the success in the United States Supreme Court and we would encourage your support for him as he has largely had to bare this burden with his own finances over the last 6 years, which has put him in the place of informa pauperis standing. Cody didn't start out that way and the action in 2008 Judy v. McCain as far as the Court Fees were 'paid'.

The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING REPORT: JUSTICE AND THE PRESIDENT-The JUNE 18TH CONFERENCE THAT WE WON! JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 - SUPPORT GROWS 250,000!

BREAKING REPORT: JUSTICE AND THE PRESIDENT




BREAKING REPORT: JUSTICE AND THE PRESIDENT-
The JUNE 18TH CONFERENCE THAT WE WON! JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 - SUPPORT GROWS 250,000!
The Play-by-Play call from the Announcer's Stand

The task seemed simple at first "Explain What's Happening" to me? She was at a golf match so grossly involved with all the intricacies of the match at first she thought it would be easy to tell her husband who had never seen a match. She pondered it two seconds and realized he would never understand without the time she had put in. We heard it again, "Explain What's Happening?" This time from someone who had never seen a football game asking a coach in an NFL Playoff Game. All of a sudden the task was daunting where time and word-space limits as well as attention span all came into effect. Americans had become so engrossed with instant satisfaction they no longer cared for details unless it was a subject they themselves specialized in, but they really liked slow motion!

Such is the case with me and trying to explain to so many what is happening now in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and the implications of everything in a combined experience of the last 6.5 years. Of course I am not a professional or licensed attorney or Mechanic and we all know sometimes they have been known to take advantage of you when you were so uninformed on a subject that you just had to write a blank check. That's kind of what's happened in our Government to; politicians placed in a comfy position of intelligence are gaining that unfavorable rating from the pubic that started out with a favorable trust.

Sometimes it is very hard to keep up on a Case when so much is happening. I really applaud anyone who is paying attention to this now. Can you imagine the people who haven't read a single post yet and trying to explain this to them? You can understand how easily our Constitution has slipped out of the lime-light and into the closed chambers of the Justices and Officers of the Government. It becomes a bigger deal when those rights you simply thought would always be there suddenly are not and you find yourself a subject rather than a Citizen. All of a sudden it is a huge deal!

This has been my experience and I know how hard that is now. Within the context of the latest CONFERENCE of the United States Supreme Court that happened June 18th, 2015 let's take a look at some very basic things many antagonist are failing to mention in their comments in an effort to discourage your support and hope. I like to bring a big picture to the party and point out details they are missing and then let you begin to enjoy the big picture as I do to.

The June 18th CONFERENCE that we WON!

What? How can you say you WON? The June 18th Conference was kinda of like a finish line because it represented a GOAL of sorts people predicted you would not get past. In fact they were so sure you would not get past it, they placed all kinds of bets against you and told all their friends there's no way he will get past the June 18th Conference!

So, what does it mean when we got past the June 18th Conference? It means we won and its glorious! The losers are mumbling and grumbling with excuses that you usually here from losers none of which change the results. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has done something no other Birther Case in the history of Obama has done. It got past the first Conference date without suffering a death on the Dismissed List.

Now, are there more games to play and finish lines to cross. Yes there are, and are there chances that we could win and lose at ever juncture which is kind of like the regular games of a Season Play hoping you get to the Playoffs and Superbowl- Yes.

HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT WIN?

Well, the U.S. Supreme Court placed me on a "Pending Motions List". That means there are Motions before the Court PENDING that haven't been adjudicated, but that's better than having them adjudicated and being turned out on the Dismissed List of course which was the experience of some 165 of the 177 cases the Court took a look at June 18th. That placed us in the top 12 which was just thrilling, because just think about it. 165 Cases and the people involved in them were handed the consolation award of their "Case Number" and patted on the back and sent home probably never to come back.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WIN
The circumstances of being put on a PENDING MOTIONS LIST can be both 'tactical' and 'necessary'. Let me explain. In my Case the Motion for Informa Pauperis or the Motion to Proceed without Cost due to my not having enough money to pay for the Court Filing Fee and the Printing of 45-48 Booklets of a 43 Page document that is about like printing the Constitution Pamphlet up could very well have been done BEFORE the June 18th Conference. Let's not forget my Case was first initiated in the Court on March 30th, as you can see!

With ALL of April, and ALL of May, and 18 Days of June, which makes up the 1st trimester of a baby, are we really to assume the Court could not depose a single Motion in the Case? Of course the court could. Usually, a informa pauperis proceeding is the very first thing that is looked at by a Justice or Judge, not the last thing. Another fact, when filing it it must be stapled on the FRONT of the Writ of Certiorari Petition by Court INSTRUCTIONS. So, its impossible to miss stapled on the front of the 11 Copies provided to the Court that I still had to finance myself to get printed up and mailed as well serve the Respondent(s)copies. I figure quite easily I've already got $200 in materials and cost right there.

We know the Court can depose a Motion in a day, so to wait until June 18th, the Day of the Conference after it sits there for 78 Days, is it more likely that the denial was a "Tactic" or a "Necessary"? The answer of course is "Tactic". What are the pros and cons of the 'tactic' that make it useful?

The biggest one quite frankly is it buys more time for the Court to think about, discuss, and research the ramifications of the Case itself without tipping their hand one way or the other officially. Of course it places a burden upon me, but one that can be finagled either by Requesting another Review of the Motion, or buy simply paying the fees.

There were many other Cases that were heard June 18th that had their Motions of Informa Pauperis all taken care of. They had been denied and actually still had enough time to get a 2nd Review on the Motion and had time to get that denied. This of course, lends credence to what I'm saying as far as it being 'Tactical' for the Court.

A tactical play also means you have business with those Justices, and its higher than likely more than one is on in the private discussions. This of course means, "You got game"- They are interested! Of course in a Case that decides the right of every American to at least vote for an eligible Candidate for the Office, to presume they wouldn't be interested would be pretty dog-gone cold on the preservation of the Republic for which we stand.

Is there anything else that suggest 'tactic' rather than 'necessity - or clerical error'? Why yes there is. The same Court approved the same Motion in 2012 with very little variation, accept my son being 3 years older and my car having odometer having 247,000 miles on it instead of 200,000. I don't think the cost of living has gone down over the last 3 years and my income most certainly hasn't reflected any gains over Obama's time in the White House. My networth has stagnated and I've just scraped by very meagerly and humbly. While Obama has afforded many vacations, I have had 0. My golf has been cut way back. I think I've managed 10 rounds in the last 3 years. Things have been tough, but I haven't had any assistance federally as far as food or housing, though I certainly would have qualified if I'd gone in and asked.

That's the kind of information that the Court has in front of it and to deny my Motion after granting it two years ago, just doesn't make any sense at all. Now maybe they expect a Candidate for President to be rich? I don't think that is on the Qualifications in the Constitution. Maybe they expect supporters to contribute and make the Campaign rich? After having so many losses, peoples confidence is wearing thin and it wasn't as if I had won an elected office before and had a network of support that was anything but social.

Of course that eliminates special interest, lobbyist, and puts me in the same category as Donald Trump mostly self financing my Campaigns in time and talent. I told the story before, but I did the same thing with the house I built in California. Built the entire thing myself with the assistance of others perhaps 3 days during the entire project. The bank came in and said, "Yes! You have a equity, about 50% of the worth." It was a lot of hard hard work and that's what's been done in my Campaigns. Of course, a net-worth is not required in the Constitution for the Office of the Presidency and a "serious Candidate" might be defined by actually preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution instead of building skyscrapers or being a Senator or Governor. That's what I've been doing and if Justice is to have her perfect way, Justice might be the biggest attraction of the Nation in the interest of a Candidate for President. One who actually had experience with doing what the President's job is as its defined in the Oath of the President.

The Justices of course have to let justice happen, but I've worked like a dog in doing the job in actions. If Justice appreciates that of course I feel I have something of great value. I've actually predicted somethings, one of them being that my Campaign Chest outpaces any other Candidate in the Presidential Arena up to this point, but its on condition of Justice having her perfect way. If justice doesn't get her perfect way of course corruption has her day and injustice proceeds.

We could quite easily say it was "injustice" that granted the Motion in the same Court 3 years ago but denied it this year. We might say it was "injustice" that the Federal District Court granted the Motion of Informa Pauperis and so did the Circuit Court, yet, "injustice" somehow crept into the Court at the U.S. Supreme Court and denied that same Motion not 60 days later when my income and net-worth certainly didn't change.

All of these circumstances point me much more in the direction of "Tactical" delay of game "for the Justices to conference" than it tells me out of necessity the Courts actions were left without option and the circumstances could not have been different based on timing and normal Court procedure. I think explaining this as I have you should be able to see that also?

THE CLARITY OF THE ACTION

The other question is: Are their any other Motions that the Court might have placed me in the holding pen for? The answer to that question also; Yes, there is. But that Motion has not been registered on the Docket, so only the court can see it although I've provided to you in content as well as proof they received it to show you specifically there are things that the Court considers and Ponders that are not made available on the Docket: here.

Now to say the court doesn't entertain Motions, we know is just not true and denies the facts. What I have been trying to show you is that I think we have a very good chance here! We flat out passed the first test and I really believe with a surge of public support, and that means your assistance, help, support, passing it on, all comes into play here. You are like the Home-Court advantage to me, so let's get your cheer on!

Your support is being seen and felt. We picked up on FACEBOOK to my personal page of 5,000 being full and my Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 FB Page zooming up to now over 400 just the last couple of days! I just checked the stats on the Views here and you've done it again we are up to breaking the Quarter OF A MILLION views! That's terrific! Keep on, keeping on is what my Dad used to say and its good advice. Please help us if you can with any amount you can part with. I was thrilled to get $10, $20,$25, $35, and even a $100 dollar contributions yesterday that was the biggest day I've ever seen for a total of $298.00.
UPDATE: We thank you for Contributions received from FL.,N.C.,CA.,TX.,VA. and OR.! Updated "Change" Picture:

That is just wonderful. I was thrilled for the $10 dollar contribution because it told me she had faith that her contribution would count in the sum for a good Cause. Feeling like you matter, and you count, is just about the most awesome feeling you can have! You guys have inspired me soooo much. Thank you! I thought about the commercial you see at the bottom of the page, and thought about the title of it and you Inspiring Me. It fit so perfect.

Save and Secure Paypal Account here for your Contribution for your help with the ABC Campaign- That's the American Birther Campaign for Cody Robert Judy and your help and change today is badly needed for our SCOTUS Case!

Most gratefully,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like! Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT "ORDERS"- JUDY v. OBAMA NOT DEAD!

FEATURED : BIRTHER REPORT ; THE POST & EMAIL
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT ORDERS- JUDY v. OBAMA NOT DEAD-LISTED!

Todays' U.S. SUPREME COURT 'ORDERS' list might be the UNIVERSE SHATTERING EVIDENCE heard around the world! Today a Case under consideration by the United States Supreme Court 'failed' the death grip of what is called the 'Dead-List' of the United States Supreme Court. It's never happened before with a Case that dealt with the Eligibility Questions presented by Mr. Judy a Candidate for President in '08 and '12 and now 2016 asserting Campaign Damages for the unanswered Obama ineligibility question when it comes to the United States Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen'.

[UPDATE 11pm: We wanted to report to you 8 contributions today! FUND RAISING - I'm happy to Report today 8 Contributions. You know what I love about this is they are from all over this great Country- 2 from Florida ; 2 From North Carolina - 2 from California - 1 from Texas - and 1 from Virginia ! Thank you all so much for a total of $298.00! That's a FILING FEE in SCOTUS! Let's go and get your State on the Board! We have had over 1,500 view this post so far today if each had donated $1 we'd be there with the printing cost. Please help us with your change! Safe and Secure Paypal Link here ]

Speculation and Interest has been rising in the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case across the Nation with a range of predictions. Top Anti-Birther's have chimed in with scathing comments and even a 'prophetic post' roundly and confidently written by Dr. Conspiracy leader and chief of Obamaconspiracy.org that he comped was set to self publish at Midnight before the ORDERS list appeared at the SCOTUS web site, entitled FUTURE NEWS: Supreme Court Rejects Judy plea. One could almost see the beads of sweat appear as the confusion when Judy's case was not seen on the "Dismissed" side of the Orders List and instead landed on the "PENDING ORDERS" list.

Of course a glorious round of applause went up on the Judy side and near disbelief also having suffered so many defeats over the last six years in 15 Actions held in the lower Judicial Courts as well a U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276 Case that originated from a State Supreme Court Case Decision in Georgia rather than a Federal Rights and Congressional Act Violation the present action represents in origin. Could that be the difference?

Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) said "Yes", that could be the difference. He postulated, "In many ways the United States Supreme Court allows for what is called a 'ripening' of Cases before deciding to weigh in on them. That entails a real exhaustion of State Remedies that quite readily exhaust petitioners, sometimes completely out of continuing on."

Since the beginning of Obama's term in Office most all the Cases have been 'dismissed' based on a lack of standing which Obama's attorneys are on record of stating, "The Petitioner(s) were not a Presidential Candidate" and that has roundly been the way that Obama has not been called into Court to defend the allegations of his not being a 'natural born Citizen' qualified by the Constitution's demands. The demand of 'natural born Citizen' for President and Vice President similar to the higher age demanded also, is unique from those lower offices of U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator defined by the Constitution as 'Citizen'.

Judy said, "Citizen was used for the Office of the President, but it was specifically defined as limited only to those who were such at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution.", lending credence to the unique difference between the 'natural born Citizen' and the 'Citizen' qualification variation between the Offices. So what is the difference?

The Presidential Candidate said, "The difference is the 'natural born Citizen' definition is not listed under the naturalization terms cited in Title 8 Aliens and Nationals which includes all kinds and types of varied accomplishments towards defining American Citizenship, but the one that is not defined is the only one the U.S. Supreme Court has also defined in the Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) case cited in his Case as precedent, [it was never doubted those who were born in the Country to Citizen Parents are natural born Citizens] meaning Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. I've never thought the Office of the President was an office we should fool around with and have doubts about who was in it."

Cody Robert Judy's Campaigns for President in the fight to defend the Constitution didn't begin with Obama's ineligibility question, they actually begin with a Federal Court Case against Sen. John McCain and his ineligibility that was filed just days before the Republicans nominated him as their nominee in 2008. In Judy v. McCain many have supposed McCain's military duty exempted him from the qualification of 'natural born Citizen' [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but Judy said, that's as foolish as thinking those who have become new immigrant Citizens in this Country could not be summoned up for a draft in the military. They could be called upon to fight for this new Country of theirs, but still not be qualified to be President. The military is sworn to defend the Constitution not over-throw it. Those military men and women have a duty towards the Constitution first, not second and those who do not meet the 'age' requirements of the Offices defined in the Constitution also still have to fight for the Constitution in which they are not allowed to hold office because of being to young, but still old enough to fight."

The reference comes at the Constitution's varying demands that no one serve as a U.S. Representative until having attained to the age of 25: That no one serve as a U.S. Senator until having attained the age of 30: and that no one serve in the Office of the President until attaining to the age of 35. Judy said, "If you want to call that discrimination, your good conscience can consider the wisdom exist in being able to do just that, as our Founders and Framers pondered would best suit and ascertain the Country's survival."

Judy v. Obama 14-9396 was placed on the "pending orders" list because Judy did not meet the standard for 'informa pauperis'. However, there was some confusion about it at first. If you look at the PDF filing of the Court Orders you'll see just below Judy's case, in a specific order(s) spelling out just that description in Cases 14-8082 and 14-9797 which state clearly, "The Motions to proceed informa pauperis are denied"

In Case 14-8082 just above Judy v. Obama is states for that case: "The Motions of Petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed informa pauperis are denied"

Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is then listed with no 'specifications' of pending orders.

Next comes the Case 14-9797 'The leave to proceed informa pauperis by the petitioners is denied..'

There are four other cases also listed with no specific 'ORDER' detailed next to their cases, leaving us really not knowing what the orders are about for sure, or what they might include although all four have had informa pauperis rulings on them and they are listed on their docket reports already.

Mr. Judy said regarding his Case, "Well, I did file a Motion for leave to file my petition 'informa pauperis' in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, 2012 and my case or Writ of Certiorari Petition was just "Denied" and later I filed for a Review and that was Denied also, verifying that Informa Pauperis standing was granted but the Case was Denied Cert. No where on that Docket do you see a 'disposition of the multiple Motions' I filed in that Case either. This tells us the Court doesn't necessarily feel the need to formally rule on Motions before the Court, or they do so and do not print it on the Docket, as the Case in 2012 is Evidence of.

"While it does seem very strange to me, especially given the "Motions of Leave to Proceed informa pauperis" the Federal District Case in Utah Granted, as well the "Motion of Leave to Proceed informa pauperis" being granted in the Denver Tenth Circuit Court granted to be denied my Motion for Leave by the U.S. Supreme Court, especially given that means filing cost and a printing cost of several thousand dollars for about 45 copies. There's no way I could pay that and I've only received about $280 dollars worth of contributions which went for printing and mailing what I did send to the Court which is not covered by an informa pauperis even if it was granted. I still had to make 11 copies of the book that was 43 pages long and send 11 copies to the Court as well serve the Respondent(s) copies, and the Government copies because of the Acts of Congress being included. Now there asking it be reprinted and sent to them with the forty copies. While I understand myself that's hard, its probably much harder for the Court to think we couldn't raise enough money to file the Case and pay the filing fees and printing cost. My own personal circumstances are far worse now then they were in 2012 when my Inform Pauperis was granted and I just didn't expect this at all. Thus I'm lead to believe something else is up."

"The next question is "Do I have any other 'pending Motions' before the Court besides the Informa Pauperis Motion the Court could possibly be considering? The answer to that question is "Yes" and that is detailed very clearly here and here. The synonymous of that ORDER is that the Government and Obama have failed to even file a 'token' response that would be considered valid by the Court. Usually a Waiver of Response is filed, and though the Docket has a Waiver listed, I pointed out to the Court it is not signed by the Solicitor General and literally could have been sent to them by Russian President Putin for all we know."

OTHER POINTS ADDRESSED UNDER PENDING ORDERS

Is there any evidence that points to Cases listed under the "PENDING ORDERS list of Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court as to pending motions that don't have anything to do with informa pauperis, that are listed right along side the Judy v. Obama case?

The answer to that question is "Yes". The evidence shows us in the 14M129 - "The Motion to direct the clerk to file a motion of certiorari out of time under rule 14.5 is denied." Another one- 14-990 says, "The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted."

IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED

For all the implications to consider the most simple and basic one is that the Court is not to happy about Obama and the Government failing to file any complimentary and courteous response and while understanding the Court's ability to grant Orders without signature(s)of the Justices, it is not one necessarily afforded by the Respondent in a case like this. All of the other Cases considered indeed did have their Motions for Informa Pauperis 'denied' much earlier on in their Cases, so that a Reconsideration could be filed on that Motion at least. Many did that and it was in before their conference date.

There is little doubt that the resulting Action by the Court not to list Judy's Case as 'Dismissed', is one also GRANTING Oxygen to the Case. It has survived and has not been dismissed in the U.S. Supreme Court unlike any other Birther Case. It was not been 'dead-listed' defying the prophets-of-doom or spec-u-lators who have fiercely strove against the evidence presented to the Court. If the speculators were honest they also would include the possibilities that a RESPONSE or BIO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION is indeed within consideration of the Court now just as easily, as well as a complete reversal and GRANT of the Case as a win for Judy within the powers of the Court under De Novo.

USA TODAY, CNN, and even the Washington Post have printed parse tort against Presidential Candidate Donald Trump June 17th since he entered the race reminding everyone that the "Birther Issue" is one of embarrassment presumed upon a Candidate rather than one of honor and in all candor Obama has never had to defend his eligibility in a Court of Law preferring the easy wins of the public court with the winds of the media in his favor. Of course the bully pulpit of the Media doesn't often consider the charge of the Constitution as solemnly as the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Media is on record as often getting it wrong even in deciphering the Court's Opinions. "They, Main Stream Media, consistently seek to dis-honored the Presidency of the United States by stating Obama was a 'Citizen'. Indeed you can be a Citizen and still not qualify for the Office of the President;", Judy continued, "rather than the very clear higher standard of "natural born Citizen' demanded for the Office of the President. That should be clarified. To print and argue as if the two terms invoke no difference in qualification is a false narrative. "That is to state that the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President a delirious infestation of terms completely absent those for Representatives and Senators, and our Founders and Framers in the notable distinctions that are made, were also delusional or in a stage of absent mindedness.", Judy said, "Of course this is along the lines of stating Hillary Clinton has lost her mind because she forgot a Reporters name twice in the same interview. While that did happen, its doubtful in the Constitutional Convention of ratification there were not many there to catch any mistake so arbitrarily assumed and thus the implication is a very false narrative."

Fox News however did come out June 20th with a comparison reported by Sharon Rondeau Chief Editor of the Post & Email (Jun. 20, 2015) — [On his new 10:00 p.m. EDT Fox News show bearing his name, Greg Gutfeld compared the background documentation of Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who has represented herself as a black person for an unknown number of years, to the dearth of documentation available on Barack Hussein Obama.] [Dolezal was serving as head of the Spokane, WA NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) until her white parents revealed that their daughter has no black ancestry.][At approximately 10:08, Gutfeld said to his guest (paraphrased), “Obama has less documentation than she (Dolezal) does.”[in 2008, Obama ran for president without having made public his college transcripts, grades, school and birth records, college theses, work history, Illinois State Senate and U.S. Senate voting history. In December 2007, MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews said on air that Obama was “born in Indonesia” but did not question Obama’s constitutional eligibility to seek the presidency.]
Read more on that story at BIRTHER REPORT and The Post & Email.

THE SCRIPT IN THE PLAY OF ANTI-BIRTHERS

There is no doubt of the story from anti-birthers today scanning furiously for Judy v. Obama 14-9396 to be under the DISMISSED LIST of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the sheer panic and confusion that set in when it was not found after it has been prophesied to be there by their Doctor and was M.I.A. To be DISMISSED would have been sweet to them, to be given another MONTH to raise money, raise awareness, and utilize more time is something they are no doubt wishing the Court would not have done. They certainly wish the SCOTUS had just simply killed the Case. Why oh Why didn't they just kill it?

CRJ noted sincerely, "You know the Motion for Informa Pauperis is the factor in this, which is hard for me to believe living below the poverty level as I am, people who believe in this Case really need to understand that there is no way I can pay the filing fees and additional printing cost of which would be demanded by the Court for 48 booklet forms. This 43 pages and the cost is about $1,588.40 here. The public relations of this case has handicapped me even to a real detriment of paying my own bills. People have just got to understand, I cannot do this alone and their assistance and help is needed. I know there is a lot of people interested, but it just seems like no one is willing to give up a big gulp and a candy bar for this important case surrounding our Constitution."
Update:
Cody added he didn't really think that the informa pauperis was all the this was about. That he thought this was much more about the Justices being given more time to ponder the implications and ramifications of the Case in general. "Listen, the same dog-gone Informa Pauperous was granted by two lower Court this year and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012. If this was really about 'frivolousness' the Court would simply have axed it and pushed the case out not given it more oxygen. I'm not to proud to ask anyone for help. I even asked Donald Trump today for help.", Cody said, "on my Twitter Account. If Mr. Trump has the interest of the Country in mind, what's two grand of his 9 billion for a U.S. Supreme Court case. If he did this himself it would cost him a million to get there? This is much more economical."

"Its really a disturbing and unethical thought that people would want a Candidate for President to finance himself to the White House or worse to the U.S. Supreme Court in an understanding that either one of those could actually be purchased for money. If that were the case, then what Mr. Trump said is true, "The American Dream is dead.". I bristled at that, because I still believe in Justice. While I have very little money, and my net worth is atrociously below Mr. Trumps 9 Billion, our Country, God Bless it, has provided a way to seek Justice without price for those who would be the subjects of injustice rather then the Citizens of Justice for All".

"Our Country is a great place of HOPE in opportunity for Justice, where in many other Countries that Justice for All idea, is simply an impossibility no if's and's or but's. There is no way what I have done is possible in any other Country but that it would be derailed and knocked off very quickly. Of course I have experienced that in many Courts here, even the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 as I mentioned earlier. It is not for me to say that those other Courts also may have acted in a way that gave more substance to past actions paid for, then to the evidence presented on Record reflecting current circumstances petitioning for Justice.

"I have stated before, one of the Main Reasons for filing a Petition for a Writ of Cert in the U.S. Supreme Court is because of the political interference presented by Judges and Justices of the Lower Courts having to run for election where the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have a life tenure in their seats. The U.S. Senate Seats are for a six (6) year term so that they can also give more weight to influence corrections based on the fact they don't have an election every two (2) years like Representatives do; which might cause them to be more rash about pushing through things unconstitutional. Imagine the ability for the U.S. Supreme Court Justices with a life (life term in years) seat?

"They have the ability to consciously look at the distant future of the United States from a very large BEY WINDOW. We hope the view is never tainted, corrupted with money, or favor accept to that of "Justice". Their seats are worth much more than 9 Billion Dollars when you start to think of the net worth of countless generations affected by their decisions, that's a 'no-brainer'. Our Country is certainly bigger then any one man, and our future pegged on Justice assures many more prosperity, safety, and security than the stability of single ego maniac(s) who thinks the qualifications of the Constitution does not apply to them.

Now we have got to CELEBRATE this very big news! We have not been dismissed! That has NEVER happened before in any birther Case! Never has a BIRTHER CASE that I am aware of survived past the CONFERENCE date and Orders of the Court thereafter. We are making HISTORY here! PLEASE HELP US TODAY!

Please join us! We have been given new oxygen in a very smoky and polluted arena of doubt, cynicism, and cryptic apathy. Who can say the Prayers of this Nation are not heard? Not to be on the 'DISMISSED LIST' of the U.S. Supreme Court after Conference was certainly my prayer, and it has been answered along with the mighty prayers of everyone out there and I know they are not a few people. Praise God and thank you for your Prayers everyone.

We might find one day we are dead, but TODAY is NOT THAT DAY!!! SPREAD THE WORD!!! Please help us raise the money today as the Petition must be in the Court by July 13th, 2015! That means we only have a couple of weeks to print it and get the copies in with the filing fees of $300 paid. You can contribute towards this goal in my very safe and secure paypal account here.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin coming up TONIGHT at WOBC Radio so tune in! Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI