THE POST & EMAIL
What's Your Record?
The Natural Born Citizen Superbowl Championship?
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 14-9396
What's your Record? Everyone has got a record. Last Sunday the Denver Broncos played the New England Patriots for AFC Championship and the Carolina Panthers played the Arizona Cardinals for the NFC Championship in the National Football League. The Panthers and Broncos won their respective Conference Championships, after winning their Divisions, and are now qualified to play in Super Bowl 50. Imagine the outrage of America if two teams showed up who had not qualified? This is what his happening in the highest Office of the United States of America, but where is the outrage?
CBS News reported in an Article January 24th written by Scott Simon entitled "Scott Simon: Do away with the "natural born Citizen" clause", that the qualification for President should be done away with. The article essentially derided the amount of time it took to become qualified for President if [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] were enforced, as it should be excluding even Obama, and Cruz, if [born in the U.S.]were alone the qualification.
Indeed it cannot be denied the totality of the argument includes both Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama and Cruz both claim the [conferred] citizenship's of their [Parents] at birth, so if this were denied their credibility weakens in the single claim of [conferred] U.S. Citizenship from their mothers.
The 14th Amendment enhances the [Place] as important jurisdiction in the United States of America of the 50 States as a defining territory and certainly cannot be thrown under the bus as an important part of the U.S. Constitution. As Amendments go and considering the difficulty in the Amendment process it stands as credible Law.
Indeed Cruz's citing of the Naturalization Law of 1790 as law actually excludes him as at that time, and in the Act, a mother's citizenship was not allowed in a conferred citizenship as suffrage had not been passed either. The Naturalization Law of 1795 actually retracted two words, natural born, from [natural born Citizen] in favor of [Citizen], and added a word [moral] to character. Of course the titles infer an ACT of Congress considering [naturalization] given to Congress in enumerated powers Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 and [natural born Citizen] needs no act of Congress for definition.
The absolute failure of most Reports by the Main Stream Media is of course to simply advocate upholding the Constitution's qualifications for President and Vice President distinct and unique from those of Senators and Representatives. The obvious capitulation is to remove the barrier of TIME it takes for [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] because two generations cannot be skipped, and it may also be lost with a union of a foreigner or a foreign place of birth.
Bancroft wrote in his History of the Formation of the Constitution of the United States (1884) (Volume 1 Page 346):
One question on the qualifications of the president was among the last to be decided. On the twenty-second of August the committee of detail, fixing the requisite age of the president at thirty-five, on their own motion and for the first time required that the president should be a citizen of the United States, and should have been an inhabitant of them for twenty-one years. The idea then arose that no number of years could properly prepare a foreigner for the office of president; but as men of other lands had spilled their blood in the cause of the United States, and had assisted at every stage of the formation of their institutions, the committee of states who were charged with all unfinished business proposed, on the fourth of September, that “no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the of the adoption of this constitution, should be eligible to the office of president,” and for the foreign-born proposed a reduction of the requisite years of residence to fourteen. On the seventh of September, the modification, with the restriction as to the age of the president, was unanimously adopted.
The intentions of the qualification was indeed noticed in arguments of Congress as a "Happy Barrier" or Wall that foreign influence would indeed have to recant to in TIME, and during that time of two generations, as is mentioned in Congressional Testimony of the Judicial Committee of the House in 2000, a significant change is perpetuated in cultural loyalty. As the matter is seriously given hearing, the discovery over the eight recent attempts since even 2003 has been not to disregard the wisdom of the Wall or barrier between foreign influence, as well as the incentive for the propagation of Americanism.
Of course the United States of America through the U.S. Constitution opened every single door to every single office to immigrants who become U.S. Citizens who spend some time here, and that time is graduated with responsibility of the considered Office. The Office of President simply had more TIME added to it, and it is resented by the stomping of Hell, and accusations of the devil in great fury!
The question remains in the consideration of the CBS Article, Why? If the devil is stomping and raising hell to get in your house, don't you think there are some good reasons not to let him in? If he says he is a good person and has done so much for you, is that a reason to let him in? If he says, the threats of his past murders, robbing, and general tyrannical behavior is longs since past, is that reason to let him in? If he says the law is old, does not recount modern review of the law, as well the process of The People's representation, but in bullish terms declares it antiquated without any reason to hear any further deliberations, and thusly refuses to even publish legal Case History with parties of standing to examine further his own argument, aren't the reasons he is stomping and raging in hell all the more obvious to be nefarious?
That is exactly what you have without exaggeration in Judy v. Obama 14-9396!
Part II.
DONALD TRUMP's STANDING
As a Presidential Candidate is Recognized
“I’ve said Ted has a lot of problems — number one, Canada. He could run for the Prime Minister of Canada and I wouldn’t even complain because he was born in Canada,” Trump joked.
“The Democrats are going to sue if he ever got the nomination within two days. There have already been two lawsuits filed, but they don’t have standing. I have standing to sue. Can you imagine if I did it? Should I do it just for fun?”
Trump added that he believes that he will defeat Cruz without the need of a legal challenge to his candidacy, which is why he probably will not sue.
"It’s probably why I want to save the legal fees," he said of his confidence in winning the GOP nomination.
"If I thought it was going to matter, maybe I would do it, maybe I wouldn’t.”
Mr. Trump recognized his own Standing to sue and he also notices that its only when Cruz does better in Polling that he gets a little worried. But what about all those contributions flowing from good ole hard-working Americans to Ted Cruz's Campaign that otherwise might have been going to Mr. Trump's Campaign? Are they left simply to the popular politicians definition of the Constitution?
Oh! Mr. Trump does not care about those contributions or Americans in general being snookered by an illegal unqualified Candidate? Indeed it is true, while Mr. Trump is without a doubt the most wealthy successfully business operating person, well known, and polling like the devil out there in America, his considered answer to preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution for Americans who are beset and assaulted with FRAUD, is "Should I do it just for fun?", or, ""It’s probably why I want to save the legal fees,"? Yes it is true, I have petitioned Mr. Trump to help with funding my Legal Cases, but it is also true he has always denied me any and every request as the our Record together reflects.
Now I do not want to rain on Mr. Trump's parade, or infringe on his Polling numbers, nor do I want to take away all of his wealth. In fact I have never met Mr. Trump, but I do like him for several reasons. He is in my estimation a hard-working American Family Man. He has undoubtedly put Immigration as well as the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of President front and center in the Main Stream Media. As a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party that has indeed been fighting that fight in the trenches for 7 Years now, sacrificing 50% of my time and talent much of my money in 3 runs for President '08,'12, and now 2016, I applaud Mr. Trumps efforts.
I applaud Mr. Trump's efforts as the Broncos and Panthers shook the hands of the Patriots and Cardinals who lost but played a good game in their Conference Championships. What I cannot endorse Mr. Trump for, is equating the qualifications of President as not worth his time or worth a dime.
Certainly, Mr. Trump if the Polls are correct can win the Republican Nomination. He's working hard for that. While I do not have the name recognition that Mr. Trump does, we also share in common the fact we have not been elected to Office before. However, I have understood the painful marathon Campaigns against the odds in now 7 Races including one for Representative '02, three for Senator '00,'04,'10 and now three for President '08,'12,'16.
Just considering the three Presidential Campaigns, some 15 Cases noticed at the bottom of this Post, recounts the work in the trenches for the [natural born Citizen] Qualification represented in the Judicial Courts of Law authorized by the U.S. Constitution in Utah, Nevada, California, New York, New Hampshire, Georgia and Washington DC.
That tells you I believe in the Justice System in the United States but that it is not appreciated by Mr. Trump equally or nearly on the same level on the subject of [natural born Citizen]. I think we can all agree on that.
Now if you think it's not that important consider just in Sen. Cruz's Primary run in a single Presidential Race so far, over 39 Million dollars has been collected. If we were to consider the amount in Obama's Campaigns and McCain's over the last two election cycles for President, which we all admit both McCain and Obama's qualification are at least recognized as questionable in both [Place] and [Parents], we have to surmise adding at least another 1.5 BILLION!
This makes Mr. Trump's hypothesis about the standing of a Presidential Candidate, the responsibility and accountability to the members of at least his own Party in challenging legally the credentials in question of a Candidate, very cheap and irresponsible of the duty.
It might be said that my Challenges to Obama in my own Party are buried in the avalanche of news stories, but it cannot be said that I did not care about every single Democrat in my challenges against Obama and every single Republican in my challenges against McCain as a write-in Candidate for President.
The value of that is like the work over the entire NFL season and being denied playing in the Superbowl, even though you have earned it. The Birther black-eye the U.S. Supreme Court gave me in denying my forma paupers motion Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that coincidentally had been granted by two lower Courts within the same year, (without comment or reason that is even tepidly referred to in Rule 39.8 for those who have abused with excessive filings the privilege withheld) makes it even more arbitrary.
Part III.
DEFINING CONSERVATISM
Within the confines of the Conservative national Radio Programs of Rush, Glenn, and Sean lies a deep dark secret. That is basically they have not accounted the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution's qualification for President [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] valuable within Conservative Principles. They have all bashed the Birthers at one time or another while touting they stood for conservative principles.
Take one more stab at the Left for a Free Press, Free Speech, Free Religion, Free Choice,
How is it those who have stated they believe in Nature, preserving Nature, have held such little respect for the [natural born Citizen] clause that in the very origins of nature's constructs of [nature] and [nurture] have defied their own gravitas?
The [natural born Citizen] clause is a preservation of Americanism. It is threatened by a dilution or pollution of the qualification for the Office of President encompassing two generations. It is distinct and unique.
Are Americans to become extinct as the Amazon Forrest of the U.S. Constitution is burned by Preservationist who neither see nor comprehend their insult, assault, and dereliction of preservation of a pure species: [American]? The Office of the President is the ONLY office left preserved, protected, and defended as [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] and those crying over the preservation of natural lands, original habitation, indigenous species, in most cases have a flame-thrower going full throttle on the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution, and a 50 Caliber going so hard the barrel is glowing red at the ONLY OFFICE SPACE for Americans left.
With just half the intended defense of the weeds, owls,mice for Americans, the Office of President would have no need to fear becoming extinct to only those born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Of course there are many offices for hybrids included in dual citizenship and first generationers', but why can't those Americans with no choice of dual citizenship have something to call home, and for the rest to aspire to, if it is that big, AS a Positive Incentive?
We all want pure water to drink, we all want clean rivers and streams, we all want clean air to breathe, so why in the natural course of the United States of America do we not want a [natural born Citizen] as a qualification of TIME for the Office of the President? I can think of none and neither has the the Congress of the United States or The People for the near 240 years of our existence.
In that respect of Conservatism we as Americans should rally behind a Candidate for President, rally behind the U.S. Supreme Court not only hearing but holding firm the U.S. Constitution's qualifications for the Office of President, as if it is clean water and clean air vital to our existence!
Part IV.
HOW'S YOUR RECORD?
We all have them. What is your Record? Facebook has suspended or shall we say interfered with my [normal] Facebook account activity ,for the last few years, the last few months. Two months just BEFORE the Iowa Caucus seems rather pointed wouldn't you say? Over the last 2 months my Campaign has been suspended 6 Times for upwards of three days to as long as two weeks. That's interfering with a Federal Election Campaign and has been Tweeted to the Attorney Generals Office with pictures and evidence, but will it go unnoticed as a presumable FBI Recommendation for prosecution that Hillary Clinton will be held accountable for national security breaches of the highest levels?
Wow! Certainly is a good day for a revolution and turning the tables. Yes, there are many liberals who support conservative principles and many conservatives who are bastardizing conservatism like the Establishments of both Parties are. America is in a state of Revolution right this minute! Hillary Clinton doesn't get it. Jeb Bush doesn't get it. Donald Trump isn't willing to pay for it, but is using it as a political tool in the public arena against Ted Cruz. The U.S. Supreme Court isn't hearing it and is fighting charges off denying Access to the Courts fits their profile of denial while Americans are left standing with a 39 million dollar bill in Ted Cruz's campaign.
The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?
America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution. www.codyjudy.us Directhttp://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016
BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court
The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.
Thank You!
CRJFacebookPersonal
CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!
CRJTwitter
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!
Keep coming back!
Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment