Showing posts with label Justice Alito. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice Alito. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Alito Ltr. re: 13-16 CRJ LIVE BROADCAST ON FACEBOOK

'The Cody Robert Judy Family Creed'
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Alito Ltr. re: 13-16 
CRJ LIVE BROADCAST ON FACEBOOK



Letter to Justice Alito re: Elliott v. Cruz 13-16






CATCH CODY LIVE ON FACEBOOK Regarding the following Case Letter
Cody did the following LIVE FEED impromptu on Facebook Live 8-10-2016 the first 44m:14s long the second 41m:50s in length where a great deal of very important aspects and criteria of the [natural born Citizen] principle are being conducted in the U.S. Supreme Court with a current case as well as a submission of his Motion to Reopen and the letter embedded above are discussed and read in the Open Forum for your convenience and Review.

Thank You!



Part I.

Part II.

So much has been happening so fast since the Democratic National Convention we can hardly keep up here. To really keep up to date, and see Cody's near Daily Post about news and events happening in the Political Arena we would invite you to 'Like' the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 FB Page here
https://www.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016/

We expect a lot more to be unfolding, so don't give up on a Contribution if you can, and always keep coming back! Thank You.

In the meantime, if you haven't seen the new song by The Cody Robert Judy Band you have to!
HILLARY

Also
See the New CRJ Video Release that has Sen. John McCain's actual voice doing work as Songbird for the Vietnamese in 1969
McCain's Tokyo Rose' Type Record

CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


















Monday, February 4, 2013

Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?





FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As seen on:
______________________________________________________________________
Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?
______________________________________________________________________

For the last 8 years I have wondered almost with an astonishment why "Anti-Birthers", those people who consider it an insult to ask for a politician to at least qualify for the office they are running for per demand of the Constitution, that defines for us the minimum standards for the Offices in our Government.
For that reason I wanted to create in as simple a format as possible, in less then 2 minutes, a video that defined for the simple minded person what exactly our Constitution demanded from candidates running for office as a bare minimum, and explain the reasons for such if I could.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8



My first experience with this was seeing Sen. John McCain's picture on the front of TIME MAGAZINE with the title of "HONOR" underneath it. As I read the article which trotted out Sen. McCain's interest in the presidential nomination of the Republican party in 2008 I suddenly felt a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach as I realized what the implications were in someone getting into the office of the president who was not a natural born citizen.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1837246,00.html


McCain was not a 'natural born citizen' in my mind as he was born in Panama. That would forever be his beginning and natural state of affinity. It was in the panama hospital and I read an in-depth study which proffered McCain was born 1100 yards short and 11 months late and it was an Act of Congress that gave McCain citizenship, which absolutely defies nature giving it to him. I decided to act on my gut and 3 days before McCain was made the nominee I served the National Republican Committee and 2McCain a Federal District law suit I hoped would be a reminder of Honor.
1 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1157621
2http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama

We have constantly heard that if Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii he could not be president. I don't know how many times I've heard that, but at that time I had not even heard of him. Many Hillary Clinton democrats were on board and the media looked to be scrutinizing McCain pretty good. I felt I certainly had a cause the party I had run for office in was behind. That was until U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 happened which was the second Act of Government trying to supersede 'nature' in handing McCain deferred status as a 'natural born citizen'.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres511/text

I had run as a Democrat for office before, in Utah's 1st Congressional District for Representative in 2002 and for U.S. Senate in 2004 on my own first hand experience of seeing the Constitution tossed out the window by Republicans in criminal court evidence demands and a union of church and state, but looking back now, even then, I did not understand the full significance of what could possibly happen if our Constitution came to its own demise with the wanton disrespect of those actually in the offices it defined.

To me it was as simple as just reading the definitions for the offices of Representative Senator, and President in the Constitution however many people have not done that and don't carry a pocket Constitution with them. There have been reports that Obama actually won with the most dumbed down class of people voting America has ever produced in United States history, which may very well have been rooted in the Republican party. If your not teaching the principles of the Constitution with your party, with your candidates it probably should come as no surprise that its true. If conservatism knew the Constitution, and simply stood by the demands of the offices laid out cleanly in the Constitution, there's no way Obama could withstand major players in the Republican party going into court demanding judgement.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/13/bobby-jindal-gop_n_2121511.html

As a kid in school I had so much faith in our Government I never gave it a second thought. I mean the Constitution wasn't some monstrous 2,700 page report we had to read in 2 weeks before voting and passing it in Congress like Obamacare was. I'll always remember Rep. Nancy Pelosi saying "we have to pass this so we can find out what's in it." I mean..what? Is there anyone out there who thinks we might be in trouble when a speaker of the House, the leader, comes out and says that?
http://blog.sfgate.com/djsaunders/2012/10/11/nancy-pelosi-says-she-read-obamacare-bill/

I also begin to sense we were in real trouble when I learned that Congress, both the House and the Senate, when they had a Constitutional question, were relying on the Congressional Research Service more than their own pocket constitutions for which I featured in 2 videos, because the information delivered to Congressmen basically manipulated the 'natural born citizen' term out of rulings and replaced it with 'Citizen'. The tell all tale of that was when I received multiple letters from my own elected Congressmen stating in slapped down terms there was not an issue with someone who had produced a forged and fabricated birth certificate, that if taken as genuine would still deny him eligibility for the office of President, as Barack Obama.

This ultimately led me to running for President in 2012 also and taking this information as well as the results of over 2600 hours of law enforcement investigation to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276. It is unfortunate to learn first hand that just because your right doesn't always mean your going to win. Things can happen that shift the momentum away from you, just ask the Baltimore Ravens who nearly had their Superbowl victory taken when the lights went out in the Superbowl in a 35 minute delay.

I congratulate the Baltimore Ravens in their world champion Superbowl victory, but they would understand entirely what I'm talking about if that victory had been taken by the San Francisco 49's. The point is that there are so many factors that can come into play that its almost entirely impossible to predict which way the wind is going to blow and getting to the United States Supreme Court, no small task in and of itself, does not mean they will give you the time of day of which thus far I have well understood.

We like to think and believe we are living in a Nation that advocates Justice for all, fairness, and living under the same rules, but it is far from perfect. The lack of perfections are advocated by those in authority as slips in the cracks that are regrettable; but it really sucks when you're one of the pieces of debris that has slipped through the cracks.

Education is sincerely one of the best defenses for our Country. I made it a central theme in my 2010 U.S. Senate run to memorize the Amendments and deliver those on YouTube for elementary, junior high, high school, even college classes. I am convinced that to make a more perfect union we must arm ourselves with education of the founding documents of our Country. This video features in very plain language fundamentally to our advantage which is, I believe, is divinely inspired, the forethought of the problems we face now on the qualifications of the President.

With the most basic rudimentary powers of deduction we can assimilate the facts that "Natural Born Citizen" is indeed something greater in criteria then being a "Citizen", which was indeed mentioned three times in the qualifications for Representative, Senator, and President, but that was intended for the office of the President ONLY for those living prior to the Constitution being signed. For all those born after the Constitution was signed the term "Citizen" no longer applied and it was indeed intended to protect our Country by the natural determination of two generations.

Because the President of the executive branch is the commander-in-chief of our military, it was thought to be a good idea that the extra stringent protections of our national security not be given to anyone but a "Natural Born Citizen". By deductive reasoning and by Supreme Court precedent we know there have never been any doubts to those who were "Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents" as to fulfilling that criteria.

If the economic fact that Obama has spent more money then all the Presidents combined from Washington to Bush, spending our future into oblivion is not an astounding alarm to you, I have very little hope for you to recognize trouble before its too late. If my experience has taught me anything it is that when you are in a jail cell or a prison cell with armed guards around you, with no ability to procure defense, by then its too late.

If you ever thought you might have to believe in God as slaves in America just like the Israelites did under the edicts of Pharaoh Ramsey of the Egyptians and have God very slow to hear your cry, you might have an idea of what you may have to go through by not heeding the Constitution and its gift to you purchased by the blood of those who fought America's Revolution.

It is my very humble prayer not to see you in the bonds of those prison camps of the Red Dawn where everything is perceived as normal, but everything is far from normal. We have inherited our freedom but we must constantly fight for it. I think what's even more disturbing watching her review, is that the young generation seems to feel inoculated from being thrown into the 9 digital era.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35PZRStpv8o



Its real life: the lack of concern for our Constitution and thus our freedom and liberty by a generation that has indeed had their freedom handed to them on a silver platter. If coddling or favoring China's market over Human Rights isn't the biggest sign to you that communism is something our freedom and liberty should fear I don't know what would be.



Please enjoy and share the video "A Constitution Reckoning"




Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY


















Saturday, October 6, 2012

RECONSIDERATION: Standing Mixed up in Conference Sep. 24th Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & Emergency Motion not ruled upon violating Court procedure.

RECONSIDERATION: Standing Mixed up in Conference Sep. 24th Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & Emergency Motion not ruled upon violating Court procedure.


http://www.scribd.com/doc/109209314/Letter-to-Justice-John-Roberts-Reconsideration-Standing-Mixed-up-in-Conference-Sept-24th-Emergency-Motion-not-Ruled-upon-violating-Court-Procedure


FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As Seen on:




Cody Robert Judy
3031 So. Ogden Av. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah, 84401
Ph.801 / Email / codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us : www.codyjudy.blogspot.com :YouTube: CodyJudy

- - - -
Chief Justice John Roberts – United States Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter
Washington, DC 20543-0001

RECONSIDERATION: Standing Mixed up in Conference Sep. 24th Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & Emergency Motion not ruled upon violating Court procedure.

Dear Chief Justice John Roberts: October 6th ,2012

In the humblest way affordable our Founders and Framers sought justice for all under the law. Your Honor, I humbly appeal to the most basic sense of Justice because, I believe, the standing in my case was mixed up with Weldon v. Obama also a Georgia case. As a Petitioner for relief the question I have: How can “No”, and “Yes”, to the questions of my Writ of Certiorari be considered a balance?

In a Sept.28, 2012 ruling in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Hassan v. F.E.C;11-2189, by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, in principled terms concurred that the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5 had not been “trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

[(pg.16) briefly, the Court notes that Article 5 of the Constitution provides an explicit method to amend the Constitution. See U.S. Const., Art. V. Even if a constitutional provision could be implicitly repealed in the same manner as a statute, the implicit repeal of statutes is disfavored and will not be found absent clearly expressed congressional intent. See Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 662 2007); Posadas v. Nat’l City Bank, 296 U.S. 497, 503 (1936) (holding that “[w]here there are two acts upon the same subject, effect should be given to both if possible”). (Pg17). - the Supreme Court has consistently held that the distinction between natural born citizens and naturalized citizens in the context of Presidential eligibility remains valid. See Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163, 165 (1964) (“The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be President.”); see also Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654, 658 (1946) (same); Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673-674 (1944) (same). Plaintiff essentially asks this Court to declare that a provision of the Constitution is itself unconstitutional. It is beyond this Court’s authority to do so. “[T]his Court lacks the power to grant the relief sought because the Court, as interpreter and enforcer of the words of the Constitution, is not empowered to strike the document’s text on the basis that it is offensive to itself or is in some way internally (Pg.18) inconsistent.” New v. Pelosi, No. 08-Civ.-9055(AKH), 2008 WL 4755414, *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), aff’d, 374 F. App’x 158 (2d Cir. 2010). Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail. ] Pg. 17 Hassan v. F.E.C. District of Columbia 11-2189

On the opposite side of the coin is my case where the Administrative Court ruling, the subsequent Superior Court, and Georgia Supreme Court has held that the 14th Amendment did in fact over-rule the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5. In these two example cases the affect cannot be given to both.
The two varying opinions are in collision with each other Your Honor. The denial of my Cert by the SCOTUS in fact catapults the latter from the realm of dicta to holding and is being used as such in malicious tread upon me as a sore loser. I am a Democratic Candidate for President.

I don’t believe I am a sore loser Your Honor when I have lost under the laws that govern all, but when I have lost under lawlessness in a contest with specific laws defined as my rights, then indeed it is not only me that is sore but the laws and rights defined as The Supreme Law of the Land that have been trampled in the election contest.
The effect of this case is felt by every registered, and future, voter in the United States of America, thus the magnitude of justice is weighted heavily in affirmation of balancing justice, straightening out the law, and stopping the momentum that seeks to destroy the law, and in such includes the very seat of Justice in which you sit.

There is one more thing Your Honor that I wonder about which came from a comment that the SCOTUS and specifically Your Honor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Alito were indeed laughing at me: Anonymous Comment made:
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/10/media-gloating-over-obamas-eligibility.html

[ It wasn't so much the clerks laughing but justices Scalia, Alito and Chief Justice Roberts. All three of them have one or more foreign parents, and all three naturally tend to believe that their allegiance to the USA is not affected by whether the parents were naturalized before or after the justices were born. They are likely to have had friends who had foreign-born parents who were naturalized after their children were born---and they did not notice any difference in the behavior of these friends from people whose parents were naturalized before the children were born.]

[The laugh is that Judy was asking Scalia, Alito and the chief justice to vote that they believed the writers of the US Constitution may have believed that the US-born children of foreigners (who the justices ARE) are not as good as the US-born children of US citizens. Well, they do not believe it, and they certainly would not vote that the writers of the US Constitution believed it unless there were actual evidence that they did---and there isn't any. That's quite a laugh. ]

My case has a Motion that was never addressed, or put forward, and I respectfully request the attention to it as a matter of integrity toward law that the cost of it demands and a reconsideration of my lost standing if of course there is no merit to the comment in consideration and Your Honor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Alito are not sore at the Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’ for the Office of President.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy/Petitioner Judy v. Obama 12-5276