Time to Pony Up in that Saddle!

Time to Pony Up in that Saddle!
Breaking News: Will U.S. Supreme Court Document Crack the silence of the Justices on Obama's Eligibility?

I wonder if it’s a sad tune that bares my name “Cody of the Pony Express” or a fast paced rockn one with Cowboy and Indian Outlaws screaming in the background to the thunderous beat of the horses hooves and Colt 45 Revolvers going off as fast as they can be loaded at the fleeing pony express rider whose pale with the fear gripping his scrawny bones?

You know that expression its lost in the mail? Well, just in case anyone hears that from me its true. I have no idea why or how a two day priority envelope takes 9 days to deliver, but its true. I’ve only really noticed that when sending important court documents to the United States Supreme Court.

A funny conspiracist would say that the U.S. Postal Service just “said” or “posted” that your envelope had been delayed so that the U.S. Supreme Court could have a few extra days to mull over what you’d sent them. A real serious conspiracist would just say anything with my name on it just get's put in the slow bin and the U.S.P.S sits back and laughs at getting the money I had to fork over for 2 day Priority Delivery Service, just because I made a joke about not wanting the Postal Service to pack heat on Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday in the post, 11 paragraph, that detailed what the court was receiving in the package.

Can I get my money back? I mean I think the reality is that pony express reduced the mail delivery service for small packages between the Atlantic and Pacific coast to about 10 days. With modern high tech sorting machines, jumpo jets, and an elite tracking system meant to show off the ability of knowing where your package is at any given time, I noticed a cut in delivery time of only one day.

I also noticed that it did get to DC in 2 days, but that as soon as it got to Washington DC it took another 5 days for delivery.

Well, anyway it finally got there. This is going to be interesting I think. Oh yeah, since I've been the butt of so many jokes I made one up today that has to do with Obama's first attempt at taking the oath of POTUS. You do recall he had to have a-go-at-it two times?

Kinda Funny, but it's not?

Foul has been found in Obama's Oath recited the first time after Chief Justice Roberts repeated it correctly causing Obama to have to do it again without a teleprompter !
"I do solemonmoney swear,
That I will execute fatefully the United States Constitution, along with the rightful President of the United States,and will do to the best of my Ineligibility, to
Prevert, Subvert,and Defect the Constitution of the United States faithfully in Arab Springs
To help my dogs.. oh God..do I have to do it over?"

To all the people who say I can't write a short post, this one is for you! I'm done, (smile), and the Court document that I submitted to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 is only 5 pages and double spaced if you want to talk about getting to the point fast. Come on ,you have to give me some credit where credit is due.

Remember if you'd like to change Washington DC: The Disproportion of words to deeds is ultimately what will fail politicians. A good way to silence your own favorite politician is by asking the question, "What did you do and where were you in the biggest scandal to every hit the American People with Obama's ineligibility in the elections of 2008 and 2012?"

A fellow patriot commented to me, "Its time to go to Washington DC" and my comment back was, "It would sure be nice if we had an appointment with the United States Supreme Court". I wonder if we had an appointment and a hearing there if people would show up to that to support it?

I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: Code4Pres

The Free American Show Featured- The Old Brakes Come Off Hillary Really?

The Free American Show Featured- The Old Brakes Come Off!

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post and Email

The 'most experienced' women becomes a big question for Democratic Party donors, especially when you start to consider the experience. Hillary, like myself, have yet to declare officially, but the fight for contributions is going full blast and one that also underscores officially the preparations that must be made for the race ahead. What are we in for? Today, Clinton told Robin Roberts of ABC News Wednesday that she is "content" with the Benghazi investigation and admonished, "some choose not to be satisfied." I wondered where she got that? Probably from Obama after he released his long form fabrication.

Yesterday morning I was on a feature guest on a two hour Free American Show with radio host Clayton Douglas. Uncut, Unedited, and Medium Rare if you like your political news that way, Clayton covered subjects that many Americans are concerned about and asked questions to me that I never expected.

You could describe my experience, as I think about it, as being thrown in a tank of beef gravy. The compliment coming in that it wasn't the MainStream Media Obama Kool-Aid that is subject to being control-edited by FCC, which would have probably done more then fine the two hour show every 2 minutes.

I can only imagine Obama calling the BLM in Texas and issuing an executive order that the towers sending the program out be sprinkled with devil's communist water to stop the heavenly choir from echoing the constitutional broadcast. Its the kind of show that most pastors would concede might scatter the wolfs.

PlayBack link Host Clayton Douglas w Cody Robert Judy on The Free American Radio Show

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/claydouglas/2014/05/06/the-free-american

Popular Education Internet Radio with Clay Douglas on BlogTalkRadio

There are probably not a lot of people running for election who would jump into the gravy pit for two hours straight with the someone who I said looked like the wild bill of radio Clayton Douglas,

but I thought it was a refreshing experience. If you are the kind of person who can keep the focus on love for the United States Constitution, our Country and We the People, then I think you'll be okay.

If you're the kind of person who actually doesn't mind your favorite candidate for President putting his actions were his mouth is, don't mind seeing your favorite candidate for President getting his hands dirty for instance changing his own brakes to save four hundred dollars he'd rather put into making sure the Constitution is preserved in Office of the President qualifications that empower the whole Executive Branch of our Government in a self determination of individuality and respect for that you might like it.

I don't do brakes either, but after 230,000 miles on my 2003 Saturn Vue they needed to be changed. I mean when you can hear someone braking 2 blocks away its time to change the brakes. Speaking of changing the old for the new. Getting your hands dirty probably means two different things to me and Hillary Clinton.

You have heard the saying "out with the old and in with the new"? More and More Americans are finding out that the old Media, the Old Politicians, the Old defense for the Constitution just isn't true or working anymore. One of the tried and true principles of America has been the embrace of truth from many different perspectives as a whole under the banner of the United States Constitution. In many instances that included the watch-dog of the Media but as we have seen there has never been such an gene splicing between government and the media with Obama and the Mainstream Media.

As the video below demonstrates the Government left unchecked is quite willing to dispose of the rights of everyday Americans on such a casual basis that the value of such is hardly a wrinkle in the nose of most Media outlets. Unfortunately party politics has all to often become more and more of the reason we see Congressional Hearings exposing things like the fact everyone that has signed up for Obamacare probably doesn't know they unwittingly lose the right to privacy about their health care. While this plays to Republicans you have to wonder why they haven't yet considered a hearing on Obama's eligibility and identification fraud which contaminated the elections of 2008 and 2012 to such a toxic level as to actually call the results of them illegal according to the Constitution in the race for President.

Post by Steve Reichert.

We have seen in the Benghazi revelatory emails coming out of an individual law suit that the Government in the Executive Branch was not only very willing to fill the American Public with rhetoric that actually enraged Muslims all over the world towards America by blaming a video that would never have received the publicity it received without the blame but actually directed that violence against every living American at home and abroad through the Office of President occupied by Barack Obama in the usurpation of constitutional qualifications, and the Office of the Secretary of State filled by Hillary Clinton at the same time who was able to keep the dead stare up right up to facing the family members of those who had been brutally murdered in Benghazi.

In fact I have come up with a new campaign slogan for Hillary Clinton that disturbingly sums up what has happened in Benghazi as well as demonstrating her equally serious deposition to Congress morbidly deferring blame in her words "What Difference Does it Make Now?" called "I didn't Kill Anyone in Iraq" for this is what the Democratic Party has to look forward to.

"Three columns today by three female columnist", Rush Limbaugh opened up his radio show this morning from the secret documents released on Benghazi and the war on women orchestrated by Hillary Clinton . Rush quipped that it was remarkable that three columnist today came out with articles all related to changing the public view of the Monica and former President Bill Clinton affair. The problem wasn't about what happened under the desk, but Clinton's willingness to lie to Congress leading to his impeachment by the U.S. House.

If it was just about sex I think the American people would have been much more willing to digest the issue as well as the simultaneous Aug 1998 Operation Infinite Reach attacks that became known as Monica's War because of the hidden attacks in Sudan and the obvious diversion this was to Clinton's testimony. Operation Desert Fox bombing campaign in Iraq Dec.16-19, 1998 also occurred at the same time Congress was deliberating Bill Clinton's Grand Jury testimony which blew up a tylenol factory we were lead to believe was a weapon's manufacturing plant.

The point was that these were meant to be distractions and it certainly showed the willingness to use the military for political gain. Isn't that a repeat of what we are seeing now? Are we to forget what Clinton has done in supporting an unqualified candidate in the Office of the President? An entire usurpation of the Executive Branch in our Government is just Ok?

I don't think so, and I'm not alone any more. The 24 scandals and counting that have descended upon the public in 2013 are simply a wake-up for things to come because these scandals are nothing more the a symptom of the sickness that America goes through when principles of the Constitution are forsaken. Obama's usurpation illustrates an entire sickness in a whole branch of our Government and the other two branches have thus far refused to even address this which is a manifestation of their own sickness.

How we will survive this trouble is up to the mercy of our own divine Creator as we are in a serious Constitutional Crisis. I recognize my own short comings and stumbles and my weaknesses are so evident I feel I am the one running that is exposed all the time and can hardly keep up. I do hope and pray God in that mercy will hear our prayers and show us the path we must take to keep the dream of America alive.

If Government Experience was the qualification included in the United States Constitution for the Office of the President, I'm not sure any of our Founding Fathers would have qualified in a system under the United States Constitution. Hillary's experience is not the experience we as America need at this time, although we have been drug through the mud in Hillary's experience(s).

While improvements through Amendments have been made one that has never been changed is the qualifications for the Office of the President. That has remained tested as well true to the challenges it has faced under We the People.

The problem has not been the principles but has really manifested itself in the dictates of old politicians who like my brakes have corrupted in rust the principles that are true. America has the ability to put on new brakes and drive the same vehicle in a restoration. That is elect a new President that believes in the U.S. Constitution with more than lip service.

Cody Robert Judy
P.S.
If you would like to sponsor a fund raiser featuring Cody Robert Judy as a guest speaker please review the following article

Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

If you want to join the NFT-VA like the Group on Facebook and make sure we can find the City and State in which you reside.

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

When the Trust is broken Only the Truth will set you Free - Obama's Cover-Up Plagues Trust

When the Trust is broken Only the Truth will set you Free - Obama's Cover-Up Plagues Trust

The greatest consumers of the World have indigestion, but its not being articulated or diagnosed as anything but a 'lack of control' by the institutions we grew up with. While America's credit deteriorates the leaders of America's Institutions are bewildered with the ossification process of truth and how to restore Trust.

The restoration of Trust might just be the key to America's problems on a grand or macro scale as the articulation of the trust is seen on an Institutional level or scale according to Gallup poll's 2013 article.

By far the biggest contributor of Trust in America is Congress that includes Independents, Republicans, and Democrats in the political arena. Not only does Congress control the purse strings or "TRUST" in printing money and distributing it out, but they in large part dole out Information that is assessed, percolated, and swallowed up by Americans.

So what happens when Americans find themselves thrown off balance by the information coming out of the Trust, which has been given, perplexed by the falsehoods, the lies,deceit, and fraud? The correlation between truth and trust may go hand-in-hand as the value of money in the American Bank Account and what follows is a deterioration of credit and finally a collapse all together of the money system: One everyone finds themselves in.

Look at the Truth that is being covered-up by Congress and the United States Supreme Court whose trust has plummeted in Obama's own identity fraud as Obama/ Barry Soetoro- the Indonesian/ British/ Kenyan Born subject, whose got more problems with being a natural born citizen than the big bad wolf has with being a pig, handed out his long form fabrication in the White House press core room and thus far neither Institution has even officially set a hearing on the matter with the evidence collected over the last 5 years including over 2500 hours of the crime fighting professional Investigators in the Cold Case Posse which was submitted by a Democratic Party Candidate for President in myself in 2012 and 2013 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

Translation and what we are experiencing now: Destroy America - How? Destroy the Trust , first destroy the truth and America's "Belief". Do that with fraud, the money will follow with full faith and credit deteriorating like the straw and stick house blown down by the big bad wolf in the three little pigs children's story, or, as we learn from "L'il Bad Wolf" 99% of catching pigs is "surprise" "Secrecy", "Ingenuity", "Using what's at hand - translation never let a good tragedy go to waste" and of course "Fraud" follows. The big bad wolf uses his own kin like a puppet-on-a-string to get what he wants in a deceptive trap, much the same as Congress has ignored Obama's fraud and forged identity documents, and the fact he isn't a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President according to the brick house of the Constitution.



Trust =
1-belief that someone or something is reliable, good, honest, effective, etc.
2- An arrangement in which someone's property or money is legally held or managed by someone else or by an organization (such as a bank) for usually a set period of time
3- An organization that results from the creation of a trust

The first thing that you'd expect to go in reporting news organization would be "comments" on news articles subverting the "doctrines" being preached from the fraudulent pulpits of these "Institutions" especially below the 50% Trust Line in America. Presto... comments being curtailed - unpublished - or even taken down after their controlled and paid manipulation failed.


With the new super highways of the Truth Revolution a new day is dawning in America. It is the Age of Enlightenment - information - and education that we Americans are in fact on. While we can expect delays the world is on course and the mighty are falling simply because of their abhorrence of truth- they would not hear, see, or tell the Truth to build our Trust and they did it in order to control.

We in America don't go for that "bullying mentality" much, especially given our Constitution's principles. Our land has been one of liberty and freedom and where at all cost we have found ways to cohabitate with many different religions founded in the freedom of our own conscience.

We'll figure it out as Americans' always do, certainly with the help of our Creator who has given us the principles of Truth and common sense, while our Founders left for us a great list of opportunity we favor as our Supreme Law called the United States Constitution. Even for the most ardent Obama supporters, the crash of credit will come back as a backlash of time telling pain for their support of fraud and forgery as the Trust they treasure becomes elusive.

It follows that the Institutions called into such question, by the revelations of deteriorating trust like Congress and the United States Supreme Court, News Organizations, Big Labor, and Big Corporations would at least be interested in the greatest single case in history that would elevate their "trust" by the people simply hearing the truth and then watching it elevate their profit?

If Truth is necessary to elevate Profit or "Trust", what are you waiting for?

What could it hurt to have a hearing? It sure wouldn't hurt Congress or The United States Supreme Court to come towards the truth instead of subverting it.

In short, a miraculous hope and change would in fact inspire Americans to pinnacles and heights heretofore dreamed of.


I AM AMERICANhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4otwMXGzvac


>
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES


9-30-2013 Special Update for Viewers on a new demo The Cody Robert Judy Band released today.

Enjoy this little unfinished demo while I was lost in the studio today singing/producing/rendering a demo of "He Is Her King" that I can only say is full bodied and a challenging song. Yes, this baby is not shallow at all. You can listen for days and pick out new things. I'll give you a sneak peak but I'm singing both parts here and I'll need to get my female star on board,but you can enjoy this little demo. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6bxd-BFmzM
Words:M- Male voice F - Female voice B-Both
He is Her King
vs. 1.
M- I have a little girl that I lost
F- A little girl that was taken at great cost
M- She didn't understand the love I had
F- I did't understand, I thought he was bad
M-The world took its toll on my soul
F-And I played my role, as the bells did tole
...never knowing he was my king.
Chorus -
M-Never knowing he was her king
F-Never knowing he was my king
M-Never knowing he was her king
F-Never knowing he was my king
B-He is my king (echo 3 timed)
M-He is her King and I will sing
M-He is her King and I will sing.. F- I will sing
M-and I will sing...he is her King
M-and I will sing...he is her King
2nd V.
M- My little girl grew up a beauty Queen
F-This little girl grew up not knowing her King
... I didn't know what this life would bring
M-She fell in love with a music man
..never knowing the love of this kings hand
F- He is my world - He is my love
He is my act - and I am his scene
I find myself wanting to be his Queen
M-He is her King- and my time is past
..He is her King - but my love still last
..And I know in him there's a music-man
..And I want to help them if I can
F- He is my king - and now I know
..the love he feels - Has always been real
Repeat Chorus.

Election Challenge Update: Judy v. Obama 12-5276 United States Supreme Court Ltr. Chief Justice John Roberts

Election Challenge Update:
Judy v. Obama 12-5276 United States Supreme Court Ltr. Chief Justice John Roberts

2nd Letter to Chief Justice John Roberts concerning Judy v. Obama 12-5276 by Freedom&Liberty

http://www.scribd.com/doc/119974941/2nd-Letter-to-Chief-Justice-John-Roberts-concerning-Judy-v-Obama-12-5276
The 20th Amendment proves that the President elect may be found to be ineligible at any time by one with proper standing to ask the question. My action was initiated prior to the beginning of Obama's term, and has not been fully adjudicated by a judicial tribunal of last resort (in violation of 3 US Code 5). I still have standing to press this action seeking Declaratory relief as to whether Obama is an eligible natural born Citizen all the way to SCOTUS.

"If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified".
"If the president shall have failed to qualify before the beginning of his term" clearly leaves open the possibility that he may be found ineligible AFTER the Electoral count.

No Leg to Stand on- The Justices denied Judy v. Obama 12-5276

My ,- Our- ;), "Petition for Rehearing" with the U.S. Supreme Court was "Denied". ; /

Makes me feel bad because they wouldn't even hear it and in doing so they have basically, officially squashed the "natural born citizen" qualification for President in the Constitution without a word or hearing.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F12-5276.htm

I just feel terrible they wouldn't even let us have an oral argument on it,just locked us out.

You know I can hardly believe it. I wish I had one of the Justices cell phones because it just doesn't make any sense. Without being able to speak with them we are left to take the "Clerk of the court's word" for it.

Because of the process I've been through I know its entirely possible they didn't see the case and some Clerks black-bagged it, but there's no way to talk to them. If not that, then you wonder if they are so threatened that they feel the compromise is in the broader interest of the agreement;say someone's got a nuclear pointed at NY, and they simple are black mailed, which is entirely possible.

Faced with that situation what we any of us do? Say good bye to 8 million Americans in NY? God.. that would be hard.

Frankly, I think we are in a hell of a situation here and the "agenda" of what's going down is just going to blow us away when its fully understood. I mean when the FBI, CIA, SCOTUS, Military and Congress say its okay to forge birth certificates and lie your way to the top what do you say? "We tried", that's pretty pathetic but that's about where we're at.

If I hadn't been through what I've been through with the SCOTUS Clerks I might have more faith that the Justices had indeed reviewed my case. Its the actions of the Clerks of the SCOTUS themselves, that I can not deny, that make me suspicious that the Justices haven't seen their way to this case.

These actions I am left to contemplate myself and if I had not been the recipient I would have nothing to say, nor would I probably believe it if someone was telling me as I am you.

But ... I don't think there is anything to do about it either. I'm scratching my head. The good thing I do know, is that if its a pit they're digging for our Constitution, I'm sure they will find themselves in the pit they had dug sooner or later. I hope that's not the case but God won't see our Constitution die though it may hang by a thread, the thread won't break, in this I have faith.

One thing I do share is the frustration of many Americans who 'trust' their leaders and those they have elected to do the right thing and defend the Constitution. We have proven that Congress was shammed with the CRS Memorandums about Obama's birth certificate and that thousands of letters have gone out to the public with the advice of the sham perpetrated by Jack Maskell. Here's a review if you missed that.





We know that Congress was manipulated. We know that Obama passed out documents certifying his birth that were manipulated. We know his lawyers know that his long form birth certificate and short form and selective service card were manipulated making them non usable for official purposes.

We know that Obama's purported father disqualifies him from being President. We know they all know this, and that they know we know, they know we know they know, however those elected leaders in Congress that can do something and should do something about it won't.

Is it embarrassment because they have all been snookered? Is it a deep seated hatred they have for the Constitution itself? Is it power unchecked that once they get to Washington DC numbs their brain and head?

Perhaps its the snake that they feel isn't coiled quite tight enough for them to throw down the gauntlet on Obama's eligibility so we can at least have a president who fills the natural born citizen requirement of our Constitution in the White House as a commander-in chief who isn't a walking talking violation of the Constitution?

Do Republicans still feel cozy about watching Obama make a mockery of the Constitution and a mockery of them in economical protocol and the economy with a 16 Trillion dollar debt that is going up 100,000 every 6 seconds, to a Government who offers no palatable smidgen of sweet to reducing their spending?

Ever wonder how both the Iraq war and Afghanistan War could be over and our Government figure out a way to spend even more money now?

So often with the victors of war go the spoils, and Obama is spoiling our Nation and I don't think this is a place even anti-birthers, including the media, who somehow retain a verifiable certifiable belief that nothing is amiss when it comes to Obama's eligibility in the face of professional law enforcement investigations on the matter, and with what a little homework could uncover.

We're left thinking they don't like home-work, or they just don't think it matters all that much. That is definitely one way to think. Perhaps understandably they think, "No single individual can stand up against all of this because so many people are involved now."

Credibility, integrity, honest, virtue, even the moral fiber of our society is at risk because those in charge put it all on Harvey Dent... ole two face himself: Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama, whichever one he is when he turns profile. You've seen Obama cast as the Joker, but Harvey Dent who turned into Harvey Two Face makes more sense.

No one raised the roof about Obama being a U.S. Senator and there he was living the dream of a Kenyan Born lad who had literally overcome so many odds.

Somewhere in between the time Obama was a U.S. Senator and the decision to run for President he crossed a line and now we have Obama two-face and what seems all of our Government, on both sides of the isle, defending the very acts of fraud and forgery most would go to prison for perpetrating at the powerful and important level of the Office of the President.

Well, like Nixon said he believed, " When the President does it it's not illegal", only difference between the mentality of the media now verses the mentality of the media then was Nixon was a Republican, and the media now shares Obama's feelings rather then apposes that view.

Ronald Reagan appointed three United States Supreme Court Justices and many people don't recall that was superseded by Nixon appointing no less than four United States Supreme Court Justices, when wondering about justice being blind then as compared to now.

There is one slimmer of a positive to note here in the contemplation of the actions here by the United States Supreme Court Justices and that is the broader view that the United States People are gaining of them and of the integrity of the United States Supreme Court.

Of course as you may have been introduced to in a blog of mine before, justice is not always right, even at the highest levels. Many many people have not been exposed to such thought. Its almost new to them even though people as myself have suffered the injustices for years.

I am happy to have many many more people join me in the ideology that justice is really fucked up in this country by most every official anyone knows. When you can count on one hand the law officials willing to knuckle down on Obama's ineligibility and the fraud and forgery present in this nefarious cover-up, and realize the paltry handful of people with integrity who are elected officials, you gain an understanding of being victimized by the un-lawful actions of officials representing the law, and how that feels.

Yes, I'd say Obama has done more for America then any person in the White House, when it comes to America gaining a empathy and understanding for those oppressed in prisons, set up, accused falsely, and having their Constitutional Rights abolished and stripped away.

Where are my 2nd Amendment rights to defend myself after I did the time society asked? Obama's taken my guns away and now he's after yours.He'll get them to, you watch.

These poor fatherless bastard Congressmen will tote up to him to; you can't trust them as far as their oaths. If their oaths meant a red-cent nickle to them they'd be opening up Congressional Investigations and Sheriff Arpaio and people like myself would be called in to testify on the matter of Obama's fraud & Forgery docs and his ineligibility.

Look what (Congress)they've done to your "natural born citizen" demand in the Constitution America. Threw that out like a piece of toilet paper they'd just blown their nose on or wiped their arse on.

I feel sorry for most American's now who "think" they have a 2nd Amendment Right or any rights, because Obama's closed the hamper on his dirty clothes or eligibility, and Congress isn't about to do Obama's dirty laundry.

You know I used to be an avid hunter too. Really enjoyed the sport. The Governments basically told me I can't have any self defense to myself. If someone wants to pull up and shoot away they can shoot anyone whose ever had a felony pretty well get away with it. Of course that's what the Government does and sadly we've seen it witnessed time and time again.

Government decides they see someone whose peaceable assembled at home and pretty soon here they come with their S.W.A.T teams and warrant-less search and seizures capacity armed with nuclear weapons if necessary and blows you to away to kingdom come. The hunters in every state might as well start sucking the wind-pipes of their deer rifles now.

I'm sorry to say this, but there is nothing right now between you and a clean Bill of Rights and you're own law enforcement people in you're own home town in you're own home state are witnesses that what I'm saying is the truth because they are in on the cover-up of Obama's fraud and forgery and his ineligibility! They are in on it, and helping Obama as his mice!

You think this through. If every Sheriff was calling every Governor and telling them they had thousands of people at his door clamoring about Obama's fraud and forgery expecting him to complain and the Governors had every sheriff in every county hankering, Obama and his mincing Congress wouldn't be more than another week in office.

That's the God honest Truth of the matter. Now you know the reason that the Republican Party is through. Its over. They are no longer the party of conservatism and if your American and conservative you need to understand this. The Republicans in office right now are not worth the manure out behind the barn as fertilizer.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593




Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing





Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out

UPDATE: Friday - Jan 4th, 2013
I have been informed that a more comprehensive understanding will be generated Monday at 9:30 AM from the United States Supreme Court on case 12-5276 Judy v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/

SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out... again.


The pesky "Standing Doctrine" again haunts Orly Taitz again at the Ca. State Supreme hearing challenging the electoral college vote count, just as it did in California Courts in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama which went to the 10th Circuit Appeals Court and was met with rejection because none of the plaintiffs who were running in 2008 continued their run for President in 2012.

Throughout Birther History, or since the dawn of Obama's opposition to the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' required by Article II, Section I, clause 5, "STANDING" has been the biggest challenge and a Presidential Candidate is needed for standing.

Orly didn't have a presidential candidate as a plaintiff today in the State Supreme Court of California ... again. Pastor James David Manning had me testify at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON Trial, specifically because I had 'Standing'as a Presidential candidate who suffered harm in the general election. It was very compelling for the jury who found him guilty to understand my campaign had been formidably hurt and maliciously maligned by Obama's belief he could run on a different set of rules then are outlined by requirements in the Constitution.

When lawyers who have been told over and over and over again they have to have a petitioner who has "standing", or in other words are hurt by the action very directly and thereby substantiating good cause that a restraining order is sought for, what makes them think they don't? I don't get it.

It hurts the whole Birther movement accept for accounting for negative publicity. That should be the first line of offense for a plaintiff, not the best defense for the defendant. I am sorry for the money Orly spent and her effort, because I had hoped for the Constitution.

However,WE in the Birther movement have known and do understand the "standing" argument, made very clear or if we don't we should know greater standing is achieved with a presidential candidate straight from O's defense lawyers.

Report from the Tribune on Orly Taitz attempt to halt electoral college vote count.
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2013/01/03/2345384/judge-rejects-birther-challenge.html

You know what. I've been involved in some 13 case in the Birther Movement and none of mine have been dismissed because I lacked "standing". That should tell people something. The most important or acknowledged pronunciation of judgement coming out of any case I've been involved in was either a 'guilty' verdict as happened in the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL or , a ruling that in fact over ruled with the 14th Amendment the demand for a natural born citizen made in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 in direct violation of construction laws prohibiting that action.

This is what is being heard tomorrow in conference of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The worst part of this is not being able to be a fly on the wall in the conference.I won't ever know what Justices voted to hear the case and which voted against hearing the case. Every member of the Supreme Court of the United States will be there, its not just a single justice of the United States Supreme Court, they will all vote thumbs up or thumbs down to hear this case. I need a majority of the Court to give me a thumbs up to hear it. I need 5 thumbs up of the 9 Justices.

Just as a refresher course "standing" is best understood by the following three criteria:
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:

1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

In light of this one can understand how being competitively in a race with a campaign that is hurt or maliciously maligned with another candidates fraudulent practices in the race can account for a sincere standing.

If the Court refuses to hear my case tomorrow it won't be because of 'standing' that's for sure. A negative response may be purely political rather than suited on constitutional principle.

The standard pillar which stands center court in our Constitution as a principle is the qualification that the President be a natural born citizen. If foreign influence can perpetrate the Office of the President the affect is no less than having a nuclear bomb at the center of the Constitution.

Its easy to remember with the New Year being 2013, that 13 of the 48 pages of The Constitution pamphlet are referenced to the President, far outweighing any other constitutional principle by at least 10 to 1.

What does that say to you if for instance you wanted to destroy the Constitution? What office do you do it through?

A great spectacle has taken place in front of the America populous just the last 3 weeks over what? 435 Members of the House of Representatives 100 U.S. Senators and how many in the Executive Branch- One - have positioned themselves over the U.S. Economy.

Obama upped the ante from 800 Billion to 1.6 Trillion. Obama effectively just beat the hell out of 435 Representatives who were shaking in their seats with fear that they would be saddled with the blame if the largest tax increase in history went into affect.

Rush Limbaugh's side kick announced yesterday, that Republicans were no longer the party of tax cuts. They have effectively ponied up to the Democrats and done so after repeated kicks to the groin in which a condition of blue-balls was developed. Having a case of blue balls is often worse then the case of not having any at all.

One wonders why on Earth the new Republican House doesn't throw down the Constitutional gauntlet and open up investigations into the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama rather then fighting with one hand tide behind their back continually?

The Electoral Votes are being counted and Objections to the Vote could open up such an investigation. I have standing and would be happy to testify in front of Congress of the malign done to me and my campaign for President due to the "rules" that Obama has run under verses the "rules" the rest of us have run under.

You know, many times in our department of justice things happen that aren't or don't seem fair to one or more persons. Some guy gets off with a technicality that we have to honor because if we didn't it would deprive others of the same right. Sir William Blackstone himself said famously- 1765 " It is better to let 10 guilty go free than to let 1 innocent suffer" and I agree.

What the Untied States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and Congress is deliberating in Obama's ineligibility however is justice for every American, not just Obama. Every America is being affected by our economy and payroll tax increases, income tax increases, wither it be by a job that is not created because that money is sent in, or wither it is from the shrinking of one's business rather than the expansion.

Those who are wealthy from assets are not really going to be affected that much, so if your rich already kudos to you. Raising taxes on income may have been the surest way to shrink an economy that was immediately available. The Constitution's eligibility demand for the Office of the President to be a "natural born citizen" may be the surest way to shrink Obama's pen that is immediately available.

Please pass it along and help any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
A New Ride
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI




Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America Women?

Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America?

I pledge of allegiance to the flag – Of the United States of America – and to the Republic for which it stands- One Nation – Under God – Indivisible with liberty – And Justice for all.

Our Pledge of allegiance ends with a profound statement encompassing every American with justice. So what does it tell you about what’s happening to justice in America when a simple definition of a ‘natural born citizen’- ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’- has thus far been hi-jacked by the occupant of the White House as well as the Courts?

Well, I’ve run for President in 2008, and 2012, and have begun 2016 and I tell you justice has thus far escaped me as an American in the demand that only a ‘natural born citizen’ could qualify according to the Constitution Article II Section 1,Clause 5 for the office of President.

The problem with that, and the reason you should be concerned, is that justice has escaped you also. Justice for you has been jacked for quite some time.

On January 4th, 2013 the United States Supreme Court meets in conference to discuss a couple of things regarding my case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. Among them the ripeness of the case, the competitive standing of the petitioner (me), and the reconsideration ultimately that the Courts can’t have it both ways as far as the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President.

Justice can’t demand the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification for the office of the President be upheld in denying a ‘naturalized citizen’ the ability to run for President as the case in a Sept.28, 2012 ruling in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Hassan v. F.E.C;11-2189, by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, in principled terms concurring that the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5 had not been “trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as was the case by an Administrative Court ruling in Judy v. Obama, the subsequent Superior Court, and Georgia Supreme Court holding that the 14th Amendment did in fact over-rule the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5.

There could not be a plainer simpler determination to see in the presumption that justice has been jacked.

It seems that just as soon as the name Barack Obama is not included in the action before the Court that all of a sudden the Court upholds the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification as a standard that demands no foreign influence in the office by birth or parents. This is how it was suppose to be as the unique demand for’ natural born citizen’ only exists for the President and Vice President Office and is not a part of the qualifications for the Offices for House of Representatives or U.S. Senate.

The Constitution itself in the clause lays bare the exception to a ‘natural born citizen’ occupying the Office of the President as it declares that ‘a citizen’ is able to occupy the office if the person was not a ‘natural born citizen’ prior to the signing of the Constitution.

The Judicial Branch of our Government has long been held as the Branch most dedicated to upholding justice for individuals. The Courts is where we go when we have been wronged rather than the gun cabinet as was so often frequented in the Wild West. We are a nation of laws and our Constitution has long been held the factor that made the United States ‘indivisible’ in our pledge of allegiance as we uphold that as the Supreme Law of the Land.

Of course States could vary on many issues, but upon the United States Constitution every State and every Political Party for that matter came together lest civil war unfurl its banners with death and mayhem being carried out dividing us in our own backyards as a Republic.

Ask yourself if you’re questioning that document if you’d appreciate a few States being allowed to incorporate slavery again? Women’s suffrage? 2nd Amendment Right to bare arms? Or even prohibition?

Hollywood might engage support in terminating weapons meant to throw off a repressive Government clearly out of step with the Supreme Law of the land, however, just as soon as you remove the ability for them to use weapons in the movies, or curtail free speech in a Hollywood Drama in anyway including Broke Back Mountain, you might see Hollywood reaching for and supporting the 2nd Amendment very quickly with an aim that is very sharp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B1EObqM9Z0s



Yes, it’s just a matter of liberty and freedom when it really comes down to it that is very important to all of us. This freedom and liberty has unleashed Hollywood to spectacular heights in the eye of the world but those heights also mean that the fall can be a painful one if our Constitution is not upheld.

I’m sure they get it and don’t need a lecture from me, accept sometimes people think they can have it both ways. In the past we have done a pretty good job in maintaining balance in America which is not easy. You've got to want it badly. The forces against women especially are continually urging for repression and the defense is continually assaulted.

That’s why it pains me so bad to see especially women standing against the United States Constitution in the demand for a “natural born citizen” in the Office of the President. I mean you want to talk about slavery again, putting a veil over your face, losing your right to vote as a citizen, and a return to the dark ages, those who voted for Obama seem to have no clear idea of exactly what a termination of the Constitution means to them personally or the effect upon our Constitution through the office of the President.

Yes, I have long been denied justice in my runs for President. I have long been denied a fair race. Obama has seen himself as an exception to the rule of law. Many courts have seen that and concurred. Obama’s lie about being a ‘natural born citizen’ is probably only surmounted by his lie to women that he does not want to see them stripped of their citizenship.

If actions speak louder than words, and they do, it is clear or should be clear, that not holding up the Constitution in the demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ in the office of the President is just as good as wiping away a women’s citizenship completely. There is no better way to get the task done.

You don’t think he’d do it? Well, you must be very good at lying to yourself, and to others, to have this lie perpetrated against you. Obama is a perpetrator in your house- the same house that has protected women’s rights in the United States Constitution.

Here’s the question: How long are you willing to wait for justice to roll around to hearing your cry again? How long are you comfortable weeping? 2008-2012-2016, have you ever thought about how many years it will take you to gain justice again for your plight if the Constitution is null and void?

And the worst part of it? It was done by your own hand…your own vote.

I am the biggest advocate for women’s rights you have at your disposal. I have been serving you in all the years that I have been denied justice in this fight to defend the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President. I pray to God that my suffering won’t translate into your suffering, because once that takes place I cannot guarantee that you won’t be denied justice just the same as I have been denied justice for as many years and that is pain I don’t want to see you experience…again.

Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

SCOTUS Election Announcement Presidential Elections Contested & 1st 2016 Pres. Election Commercial

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign has two very important announcements.

First the United States Supreme Court (has/is) (received/receiving) the formal MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of the Writ of Certiorari in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that is found on this Scribd link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111856979/Judy-v-Obama-Motion-for-Reconsideration-12-5276

This very well may be the first legal 2012 election challenge that will be noticed in the United States Supreme Court after the election itself.

Confirmation has still not been received of delivery, though expected delivery date has passed as of 4:27pm Nov. 5th, 2012. This means that confirmation might be expected on Election Day Nov. 6th,2012.


03112550000022697667
Priority Mail®
Processed through USPS Sort Facility
November 03, 2012, 9:34 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20018
Expected Delivery By:
November 3, 2012
Delivery Confirmation™




Today also marks the Premiere release of the 1st 60 Second 2016 Presidential Election Commercial for Cody Robert Judy as an Independent Party Candidate for United States President. This is an important 'NOTICE' because in the Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama decision the 10th Circuit ruled that it did not appear that the Candidates for the 2008 Election were still involved in getting Elected to that office in 2012, thus maintaining their "Standing", and as such their complaint on Obama's eligibility and grounds for relief were seen as moot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac





With Polls at a near tie in Ohio the race with the Republican Nominee Mitt Romney and the Democratic Nominee Barack Obama may be difficult to call - who will be the major party or group of losers that may stir an eligibility challenge?

If Barack Obama loses in a very close race, perhaps the Democratic Party will become dis-enchanted with Obama and question his legal standing to even be on the Ballot in the first place protesting the election of Mitt Romney and the dis-enfranchisement of every Democratic Party Voter.

However, on the flip side of the coin, if Mitt Romney were to lose the electoral college vote, Republicans faced with another 4 years of Barack Obama's ineligibility may throw down the gauntlet on Barack Obama's fraud and forgery, insisting the Democratic Party never did put up a legal and qualified candidate and so their nominee should win by forefoot. Of course we all know if that happens Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity will indeed be in tears with wrenched hands and bowel problems, nevertheless it just might be the best lesson they have learned in their life.The Constitution is a power to be reckoned and the party who dismisses it, does so at its own peril.

One must ask themselves the question, "if Republicans had a choice between another 4 years of rule in the White House with Barack Obama or supporting Cody Robert Judy's eligibility challenge of Barack Obama which one they would choose?" Which one do you think they would choose?

In either case, Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama Case No. 12-5276 is indeed available to any particular political affiliate who sees a need to finally take a stand for the Constitution whether in the Judicial or Legislative Branch of the Government. While the Judicial Branch may have think they 'hood winked' the election, Republicans do have the ability to lay waste to Obama's fraud and forgery in open session of Congress as he is a disability according to the 14th Amendment Section 3.

It will be quite interesting to see who is willing to concede the election based on the fraud and forgery Barack Hussein Obama has presented to the public.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY CODE4PRES

Lost… “The Democratic Party” ? GAME ON!

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As seen on :

Lost… “The Democratic Party” ? GAME ON!

What does it profit the Democrat Party to gain the Presidency in Obama and lose their way?

Disturbed, disillusioned, demoralized..words that the Democratic Party are grappling with under the surging polls three weeks before the election that has placed Pennsylvania and even Wisconsin in the house of cards falling out from under Obama. Democrats and Liberals are hurt and frustrated with themselves because they bought into the forgery of Barack Obama and its spilling into anger.

If Obama loses the general election how could any Democrat not blame him for their demise? Remember the first Birthers were indeed Hillary Clinton’s supporters firing away on Sen. John McCain’s foreign birth in Panama and naturalization by Congress 9 months after his birth in 2008 and Republican Candidate Santorum led a 24 million dollar fundraising effort on the back of ineligibility in 2012 as he was 3 when his father was naturalized.

The general population is in fact finding an alternative to the forgery and fraud of Obama in Mitt Romney a salient entrée to what the United States Supreme court and literally the entire Judiciary has swatted away culminating in the September 24th SCOTUS Conference debate of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that featured, from a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party, Obama’s entire dossier of fraud and forgery.

Handed to the democrats on a silver platter was Mitt Romney’s head on a Constitutional bases of not standing up for the Constitution yet they refused. An angelic pillar of fire from Heaven existing in the truth of the presidential qualifications in the Constitution showing Obama neither born in the U.S. nor to two Citizen Parents, the entire Democratic Party is paying for the cover-up actually created for Mitt Romney’s win.

The only thing palatable candidate to Americans facing the reality of the shuffling feet of the Judicial Branch on their own precedent to the qualification demands of the Office of President as a natural born citizen is Mitt Romney, just as Obama was to McCain in 2008. Isn't it time Democrats faced that reality?

What the major media outlets and comrade TV Shows are finding out is that their Obama cover-up actually didn't anticipate the Republican nominee showing up at the debates period let alone in the form of a much more business savvy and attractively personable in white tie Mitt Romney as compared to 2008 Sen. John McCain. What did they expect Mitt Romney couldn't find any comedian willing to write jokes for him to read?

If that was the only hurdle Mitt Romney had to clear in becoming “personable” the Obama risk takers deserve to have their political billion dollar campaign hat handed to them. Democrats are indeed finding there are some things money can’t buy and it’s a lesson in taking a stand for the bulwark of the Constitution.

The demise of the entire Democratic Party is on the short track unless they get back on the track that had heretofore been consistent to their taking a stand for the Constitution as in yesteryear Civil Rights stands. From Mark 8:36 we read “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

Obama’s short sojourn in the White House with a Democratic Party majority in the House and Senate will be looked upon as the last hurrah and not taking the Constitution serious or the economy will be the “stupid is as stupid does” epithet written upon the Democratic tombstone for decades. Will the short lived fantasy or delusion be worth the hospice stay before post mortem sets in?

October 20-2012 Obama's Concession speech planned.
Note: http://hillbuzz.org/daily-doom-antidote-solid-proof-obama-is-planning-a-concession-speech-event-for-november-6th-election-night-10182012-10182012

It doesn’t have to be. The United States Supreme court has been given the opportunity to rule upon an issue that probably won’t come up again for a good 20 years settling what has not been settled for Americans who have been looking for a United States Supreme Court ruling on the matter of Obama’s eligibility for four long years in the reconsideration request of Judy v. Obama 12-5276.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/109209314/Letter-to-Justice-John-Roberts-Reconsideration-Standing-Mixed-up-in-Conference-Sept-24th-Emergency-Motion-not-Ruled-upon-violating-Court-Procedure

With the Birther outcry upon the Nation that has been raised with Obama one cannot really suspect a naturalized citizen or member of Congress who’s not a natural born citizen to race into the fire Birthers have created and stoked for Obama. Even by Obama’s admission he hasn't enjoyed being the lime-light of Birther parties.

What is Obama worth to the Democratic Party if he loses anyway? Obama just might be worth taking a stand for the Constitution and exposing the Achilles heel of Mitt Romney which is indeed the Constitution he has not taken a stand for in his 2008 or 2012 run for President for which it would be very hard for even 60% of Republicans believing Obama not a natural born citizen to agree, indeed shattering the base of Republicans with a candidate who did.

It’s a late game interception, but one that would no doubt capture the momentum back for the Democratic Party across the entire Country. We got three weeks before the election but from the record of Genesis we all know what happened in 6 days, we have plenty of time, especially with the Media on our side.

Mitt Romney himself emphasized he had an attractive wife, but we have Bill Clinton!

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES - CODY JUDY

An All American "THANK YOU" to ObamaBallotChallenge.com Life Time Memorial to Justice John Roberts

A Big Thank You OBAMABALLOTCHALLENGE.COM for Chief Justice John Roberts Lifetime Memorial in Judy v. Obama 12-5276!

Obama Ballot Challenge.com
Pamela Barnett ; George Miller & all at ObamaBallotChallenge.Org

Thank you so much for being such a patriot for our Country in the work that so many Magazines/Journals/Newspapers/Bloggers/TV Stations/Radio Shows refuse to touch! Your work , Pamela Barnett's, and everyone at ObamaBallotChallenge.COM has been so valuable to me and meant so much, words seem insufficient as credit. It has been a real privilege to communicate with you the last year and I want to thank you for posting and communicating the stand that has taken place with my Campaign this year for President of the United States in the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

My gratitude extends to all your hard work and my happiness is made in knowing we together made a difference. Success is indeed not always measured in winning but in making a difference in a positive way. When it comes to our Constitution as I look back at this Campaign I see there were many who prayed for our success, many who passed on what was posted, and by those actions many who gained a greater appreciation and honor for the work our founders and framers also entrenched their talents, money, and time for the iron pen of the United States Constitution.

We know whose side we are on. Who can say with any degree of knowledge that we have not been engaged in the spirit of truth of the original interpretation of our Constitution in the barricading the biggest door to its pillars which is the qualifications of the Office of the President? Thirteen pages of the forty-eight pages found in The Constitution of the United States pamphlet are references to the Office of the President. These are thirteen pillars strewn together acting as the cap-stone of the Office of President guarding the entire Army, Navy, Air-force, Marines, Habeas Corpus, Free Speech,The Right to Bare Arms,Congress,Our Treasury, and the many individual Rights as Citizens all individually important pillars but by far relying upon the 13 Pillar Wide Capstone of the Office of the President.

Indeed we are living in a time where the sentiment expressed in the letter from our first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court John Jay writing to our first President George Washington before the Constitution was signed, “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”, could be seen as wisdom that is as eternal as the the bounds of Freedom and Liberty are to our current Chief Justice John Roberts, which you clearly have on record here:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/scotus-receives-reconsideration-request-in-light-of-misinformation-oct-15th-738am and here http://obamaballotchallenge.com/cody-robert-judy-invokes-hassan-v-f-e-c-in-judy-v-obama-scotus-appeal for all Citizens of the United States and those on-lookers from every worldly perspective and demographic location around the globe.

Tyrants and Traitors of this wisdom are fools in the bastions of hell where the dispositions of mortal man are called godly and the nature of the supreme intelligence is unknown in our Creator God. As I see it the President of the United States should feel it an honor to have the checks and balances as well as the qualifications of the office protecting the security of the innocent from the future assaults on freedom and liberty like a gateway of gold and pearl for the short and tender term of office, until God himself come down and take the reins in righteousness and faithfulness.

Where the President's hands are tied in a rage of anger and frustration he ought to be wise enough to know these are the bounds holy to the future and so We The People ought to be happy when indeed we see our President's hands tied even in our suffering and most devout grieve we can only acknowledge to our Maker. For in those fetters freedom and liberty are floating and also protected for our future tomorrows.

Thank you again for the respect and honor you have given to my campaign for President of the United States in the year of our Lord 2012.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES- CODYJUDY



Thanks, Cody, that was very nice of you. Early on, we noticed your clear understanding of and attention to the very issues which we were trying to communicate. Your "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" (as a Democrat "birther") ongoing saga was irresistible to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. We have done what we could to promote, publicize, assist and even file ballot challenges. The frantic and comically evasive actions of officialdom say it all.

Even though the entire establishment, including the Republicrats, is fighting us, word is leaking out to John Q. Public, via the blogsphere, Facebook, Twitter, email, word of mouth and even occasional patronizing MSM "coverage." Of course, we are just one of many outlets fighting this fight. Thanks to all who have researched, litigated, complained, donated to, blogged, broadcast, publicized and otherwise supported this historic movement.

This WILL influence the 2012 election and WILL influence future legal actions, legislation and future elections. The occasional public figure's wry allusion to "Obama's" identity problem, sometimes by "Obama" himself, proves that we're alive and well.

Regards,
George Miller
http://venturacountyteaparty.com
http://obamaballotchallenge.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reconsideration Request RECEIVED by SCOTUS

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As Seen on: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/10/reconsideration-standing-mixed-up-in.html

Today, Oct 15th, 7:38AM, The United States Supreme Court received the following letter illustrating the two very different and apposing perspectives that have fueled The
Birther Movement for more than 4 years about Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as President under the strict demands for a natural born citizen. The latest decision coming out of the Federal Court in Washington DC Sept 28th,2012 has upheld the 'natural born citizen' clause unopposed by the 14th and 5th Amendments. In a statement Cody Robert Judy remarked:

"These specific Amendments deliberately were used and acted as illegal usurpation on the Constitution and Justice in the Judy v. Obama 12-5276 appeal to the United States
Supreme Court which was denied Oct 1st, 2012 from the Sept 24th Conference. Having it both ways simply provides a precedent that represents unlawful cronyism and is a promotion disrespectful to law in the coming Presidential election. I simply can't sit by and allow either mis- information fed to the Justices, or worse, go on without clarity, it acts in the justice-for-sale or auction department, so I have asked for a reconsideration and I included the Supreme Court email address in this press release that clarity is demanded. There will be no excuse on this one, the record will be made, showcased, highlighted, spotlighted, and shouted from every
house top in every neighborhood of America if necessary."

Post note:
In the following letter it should be noted that a "Formal Motion" was not ruled upon by the Court. The letter serves as a reminder to the Court of this action which actually keeps the case open as it is a formal motion. Some have asked me why this letter is not a formal motion, well there is no need to re-open something with a formal motion that is formally not closed. The letter is a polite form of oral argument upon which the Court can take notice without being made to look foolish, in my opinion. If there is no action, the next step is always available in a formal motion. My main goal is to establish if the Court's Justices are involved or if they are simply being spoon fed.

Cody Robert Judy
3031 So. Ogden Av. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah, 84401
Ph.801- / Email / codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us : www.codyjudy.blogspot.com :YouTube: CodyJudy

- - - -
Chief Justice John Roberts – United States Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter
Washington, DC 20543-0001

RECONSIDERATION: Standing Mixed up in Conference Sep. 24th Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & Emergency Motion not ruled upon violating Court procedure.


Dear Chief Justice John Roberts: October 6th ,2012

In the humblest way affordable our Founders and Framers sought justice for all under the law. Your Honor, I humbly appeal to the most basic sense of Justice because, I believe, the standing in my case was mixed up with Weldon v. Obama also a Georgia case. As a Petitioner for relief the question I have: How can “No”, and “Yes”, to the questions of my Writ of Certiorari be considered a balance?

In a Sept.28, 2012 ruling in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Hassan v. F.E.C;11-2189, by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, in principled terms concurred that the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5 had not been “trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

[(pg.16) briefly, the Court notes that Article 5 of the Constitution provides an explicit method to amend the Constitution. See U.S. Const., Art. V. Even if a constitutional provision could be implicitly repealed in the same manner as a statute, the implicit repeal of statutes is disfavored and will not be found absent clearly expressed congressional intent. See Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 662 2007); Posadas v. Nat’l City Bank, 296 U.S. 497, 503 (1936) (holding that “[w]here there are two acts upon the same subject, effect should be given to both if possible”). (Pg17). - the Supreme Court has consistently held that the distinction between natural born citizens and naturalized citizens in the context of Presidential eligibility remains valid. See Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163, 165 (1964) (“The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be President.”); see also Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654, 658 (1946) (same); Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673-674 (1944) (same). Plaintiff essentially asks this Court to declare that a provision of the Constitution is itself unconstitutional. It is beyond this Court’s authority to do so. “[T]his Court lacks the power to grant the relief sought because the Court, as interpreter and enforcer of the words of the Constitution, is not empowered to strike the document’s text on the basis that it is offensive to itself or is in some way internally (Pg.18) inconsistent.” New v. Pelosi, No. 08-Civ.-9055(AKH), 2008 WL 4755414, *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), aff’d, 374 F. App’x 158 (2d Cir. 2010). Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail. ] Pg. 17 Hassan v. F.E.C. District of Columbia 11-2189

On the opposite side of the coin is my case where the Administrative Court ruling, the subsequent Superior Court, and Georgia Supreme Court has held that the 14th Amendment did in fact over-rule the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5. In these two example cases the affect cannot be given to both.
The two varying opinions are in collision with each other Your Honor. The denial of my Cert by the SCOTUS in fact catapults the latter from the realm of dicta to holding and is being used as such in malicious tread upon me as a sore loser. I am a Democratic Candidate for President.

I don’t believe I am a sore loser Your Honor when I have lost under the laws that govern all, but when I have lost under lawlessness in a contest with specific laws defined as my rights, then indeed it is not only me that is sore but the laws and rights defined as The Supreme Law of the Land that have been trampled in the election contest.
The effect of this case is felt by every registered, and future, voter in the United States of America, thus the magnitude of justice is weighted heavily in affirmation of balancing justice, straightening out the law, and stopping the momentum that seeks to destroy the law, and in such includes the very seat of Justice in which you sit.

There is one more thing Your Honor that I wonder about which came from a comment that the SCOTUS and specifically Your Honor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Alito were indeed laughing at me: Anonymous Comment made: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/10/media-gloating-over-obamas-eligibility.html

[ It wasn't so much the clerks laughing but justices Scalia, Alito and Chief Justice Roberts. All three of them have one or more foreign parents, and all three naturally tend to believe that their allegiance to the USA is not affected by whether the parents were naturalized before or after the justices were born. They are likely to have had friends who had foreign-born parents who were naturalized after their children were born---and they did not notice any difference in the behavior of these friends from people whose parents were naturalized before the children were born.]

[The laugh is that Judy was asking Scalia, Alito and the chief justice to vote that they believed the writers of the US Constitution may have believed that the US-born children of foreigners (who the justices ARE) are not as good as the US-born children of US citizens. Well, they do not believe it, and they certainly would not vote that the writers of the US Constitution believed it unless there were actual evidence that they did---and there isn't any. That's quite a laugh. ]

My case has a Motion that was never addressed, or put forward, and I respectfully request the attention to it as a matter of integrity toward law that the cost of it demands and a reconsideration of my lost standing if of course there is no merit to the comment in consideration and Your Honor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Alito are not sore at the Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’ for the Office of President.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy/Petitioner Judy v. Obama 12-5276