What Can You Do for Your Country? 10.5 Answers for Free

Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You, But What You Can Do For Your Country
10.5 Ways to help Your Country and Cody for Free

For many of us, our concern lies in getting lost in the big world. What I mean by that is so many people view the political world as super natural, overwhelming, too big and vast to make a difference. A feeling of hopelessness sets in and the mind set of trying to move the Atlantic Ocean to the Mojave Desert with a teaspoon and a little red wagon. The water evaporates before you can get your next load out.

Well, we here at The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign know how you feel. That is why we have come up with 10 ways you can do something for your country in promoting our campaign. You see, this is our campaign. Yours and mine, and this is our Country. So let’s take it back one teaspoon at a time.

One thing I want to share with you about Cody. He doesn’t complain much about working. Every day I see him involved in a labor of love. That’s a great recipe for success, because it doesn’t matter how much you get paid, or even if you get paid because you’re doing what you love- what makes you feel good. I’ve never seen anyone who gets up time and time again after getting hit so hard many of us would just stay down.

When it comes to the freedom and liberty of our Country he’s the guy I want working in the kitchen for me. I was very impressed with the fact that Cody was a candidate who was standing up for the values of our Constitution with the eligibility and constitutional requirements for a United States President. Hey, it’s the most powerful position in the world and our Framers and Founders didn’t put in there you had to be a rocket scientist to lead our Country.

What they did put in there was modest, an age requirement and the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement that is not required for Representatives in the U.S. House or U.S. Senators. I happen to think the Framers of our Constitution had some experience with governments they didn’t like and I trust that for someone to devote their fortunes and lives to creating a government for the people and by the people there were some powerful motivations behind that.

The bloody American Revolution cost many everything they had but they felt they would rather die than live under the oppression of any government that wasn’t the type of government we have. A Republic, remember? We pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which we stand, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

The Republic signifies that our democracy was one bound by a covenant we called our Constitution. That’s why we could actually consider justice for everyone. Our Constitution guaranteed ‘individual’ rights. Being a Citizen in America is as good as being a King or Queen in any other country because the opportunity is there to progress. Any child who had citizen parents and is born in the United States has a chance to be President. Of course the chance is slim, but it’s there.

The United States has become so popular with that possibility, that ignites the fires of the imagination, that people all over the world have envied it and thought they would like to have that possibility for their children. Many have come over from foreign lands and we are a Nation of many diverse immigrants. We as Americans provided away for other people to join us in this great cause by applying for Citizenship.

It’s amazing we don’t have Palestinian Americans or Italian Americans fighting to be their own Nation or State within our borders and the reason why? Within a guideline of rules we call our Constitution, everyone has a pretty good chance or opportunity for success in following their dreams.

One of the guidelines is that first generation Americans who have been naturalized for a period of time can become representatives in government all the way from City Counsel to The U.S. House, and U.S. Senate. What a remarkable opportunity! Those first generation Americans who have children in the United States can look for their child to have the opportunity to one day be The President of the United States.

While the path to the top is marked by two generations, some have protested wanting the first generation of Americans to be able to be President and calling that principle of our Constitution unfair, discriminating, and some have even used the word ‘racist’ or ‘elitist’ in order to promote their position. Of course one only needs to consider that a nation offering so much opportunity would naturally spurn jealousy, hatred, and envy in many who rule their people with an iron fist not offering the same opportunity.

So what would prevent a country ruled by a Dictator, Tyrant, Emperor , or King from coming over to America, becoming a first generation American, and with his treasury financing either himself to the Presidency or financing one of his loyal subjects, and then through that office, destroying in any way he could the opportunity America’s Constitutional Republic had provided?

Some question if the President has that much power? If he does maybe we should put another check and balance on him through the Legislative Branch? Well, America has a pretty good check and balance system, but there are things that at times have to be done quickly that a Legislative Body just can’t get together and agree on in a short time period. The Executive Branch provides a check and balance to political paralysis in times of great crisis or invasion.

Cody Robert Judy has defended that basic concept of our Constitution and America is a safer place because of it. If you don’t think Cody’s law suit against McCain and Obama made any difference you’d have to consider that right now every Representative and Senator has Cody’s testimony sitting on their desk. That testimony sits on their desk like a great big sword that rattles “Don’t Tread on me”.

You could easily say, the words that Cody has used represents the sentiments of our Framers and Founders who also had to scrap and fight for every right they benevolently passed down to us as opportunity. You’ve heard the phrase build your house on stone not on a sandy foundation. Cody’s campaign is built on a sure foundation and anyone not representing in their campaign the eligibility as a top priority, has built their campaign on shaky ground. That poses a real security problem. Right now when things are shaky, we need to make sure we secure our foundation.

Some say you have to be rich to make a difference in politics; Cody is living proof that all you have to really do is care, and those who care are indeed rich. With that interest and value, everyone’s part becomes a teaspoon of water in the ocean of our Citizenship, and yours is just as valuable as mine. So here at the campaign we have thought of 10 ways you can help that are pretty easy and either won’t cost you anything, or will cost very little, but can have a real value to our campaign.


10.5 Ways to Help Your Country and Cody

1) Most cities or towns have a free newspaper you can advertize in and they offer a number of letters for free. They make their money on ads placed amidst the layout of classifieds. Call them up and place an ad in your area with the key words. Cody’s philosophy- a couple of bites of a banana split is pretty satisfying.
a. “Cody Robert Judy for President 2012- www.codyjudy.us- YouTube Station: Code4Pres

2) When you call in to your favorite radio station requesting a song ask the DJ if you can give a ‘shout out’ to your favorite candidate for United States President?

3) Copy and paste your favorite of 125 + videos Cody has on YouTube or links to his blog to your facebook or Twitter account. Don’t assume all your friends even know about Cody and are a click away from his web site links like you are. We all know what it means to “Go Viral” !

4) Have a junk sale, virtual cake sale, CRJ Rocks sale where you write CRJ on a literal rock, and contribute the proceeds to the campaign on a day where you’re just not doing anything and want to.

5) Post a note on a community or professional Card Wall or Back Board, Lunch Room, or College Note Board in a professional or appropriate notification of information for the group. It always helps to do this someplace your at every day so you can keep a good eye on it and repost if it’s been used.

6) When you write you r favorite singer, television actor, movie star, or sports figure, comedian on their fan page or facebook, ask them to consider helping Cody Robert Judy for President in 2012. Who says they want to see their opportunity to America wasted any more then you do?

7) When going to your upcoming Halloween Parties, or next fun party, paint CRJ in red, white, and blue letters on your body somewhere. Everyone will ask you what NFL Team that is and you’ll have a conversation piece with the good-looking guy or girl asking the question.

8) Ask your Evangelical or Spiritual Leader for suggestions on helping you to inform the congregation you belong to. Religious liberty is a good conversation piece for a sermon and many churches offer Congregational Boards or News Letters for information to their congregation. If the endorsement is seen as a hurdle offer to round up all the candidates web sites and print them in a paragraph for the Church Members as a resource of information.

9) Let’s call this a “Coming Out of the Closet” party, because frankly we were put in the closet. So when your friends are all gathered close and you’re talking about things you’ve never told anyone about. Tell them you have a confession to make, “ Your happy about Cody Robert Judy running for President, you’ve been baptized a Birther, and your slate has been wiped clean!”

10) If you haven’t text a family member or friend anything remotely responsible for years, text them and just say, “I’m working as a volunteer for the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 Campaign” and that’s why I haven’t been in touch. They will give you a pass for the next year and a half for not keeping in touch.

10.5- Pass it on! Help Cody Robert Judy by Contribution

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 U.S.C. High Standard with MLK Jr./JFK Memo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYR479ZtcaY








Thanks for watching! Now pass it on ;)

Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 U.S.C. High Standard with MLK Jr./JFK Memo

Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 U.S.C. High Standard with MLK Jr./JFK Memo
Code4Pres 126 videos Subscribe Subscribed





Cody Robert Judy for United States President encourages U.S.C. High Standards with inspiring words from Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that are good reminders for today, as we face the Constitution In Crisis with an unqualified president in office risking our National Security by the usurpation of the high office of the POTUS.

Ltr. to U.S. Senate Ranking U.S. Senate Chair- Senate Judiciary Committee

Dear U.S. Sen. Hatch:

Att: Mr. Tom Jipping

As Counsel for advice on procedural meetings with Representative Sen. Hatch as the ranking member of the U.S. Senate Judicial Committee, and his pledge and stand in doing such for the Constitution, could you please arrange a meeting for me to discuss the following that I would bring to the Senate Judicial Committee?

1- The FEC's recent stand against the Constitution in regards to allowing anyone to solicit money in a run for President without regard to that person's constitutional qualifications to do so, per age restriction and natural born citizen requirement, representing a fraud to those contributing money and services for the candidate in that specific proposal.
The six commissioners of the Federal Election Commission are being tasked with a Constitutional question: Can a foreign-born citizen run for President of the United States? Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan would like to file papers, take campaign contributions, and collect federal matching funds for his candidacy.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON DRAFT ADVISORY OPINION (http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/1185406.pdf ) This is something that Congress has already ruled upon with hearings as recently as 2000.

I am also a candidate in 2012 for the Presidency, and am not only offended, but hurt financially by this, based on my own campaigns loss of revenue from potential contributions that basically are given under false pretenses to an unqualified candidate. This is fraudulent action perpetrated upon the voter and citizen contributing unawares of the candidates total lack of verification of qualification at the FEC level. A simple action by Congress mandating the FEC demand all candidates sign a statement under penalty of perjury as to their qualifications would go a long way in clearing this up. The Judicial Branch could then also have a breach of qualification standard with the candidates signature and penalty affixed of perjury.

As an expert witness in this, my testimony would be valuable to Congress and the public trust in the American Election process for the following reasons:

1- I ran as a candidate for President in 2008, thus had what is called 'standing'; I was in the race and was hurt by action subverting the Constitutions qualifications and demands of that particular political race. The campaign I ran as a qualified candidate was hurt by the foreign born birth of candidate Sen. John McCain and I levied a law suit in the Nevada Federal District Court against Sen. McCain and against non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 as an unconstitutional breach of the Constitutional Demand for a President's Qualifications.

I have written and received many responses from Sen Hatch on the issue of his believing the 14th Amendment made null and void the demand of a 'natural born citizen' for the office of the President. Nothing could be further from the truth as the term Citizen used in the 14th Amendmt has nothing to do with the particlar demand of NBC in Art. I Sect 2 , Clause 5 as Congressional hearings in 2000 report.

The result of that law suit disparaged nearly half of the country's vote because, though it was filed before the candidate became the R Parties nominee, the Judgment didn't come until after Barack Obama was a declared winner. I should mention that before Judgment came Barack Obama's qualification short comings were also made known in the law suit to the Court by submitting the entire argument being heard by the United States Supreme Court conducted by Esq. Phil Berg, whose standing become the base of the high court dismissal. I have also been a party to other law suits regarding the matter including a submission of my entire McCain law suit and Obama's qualification in a Motion for Joinder in a California case. I have also filed 3 Amicus Curaie's on the matter and testified under oath in a trial sanctioned by the 10th Amendment where Sen. Obama was found guilty of fraud and sedition by a jury of citizens from across the country who came together unawares of each other. I am the only Presidential Candidate to do so under oath in history as far as I am aware at this time.

2- As a candidate my standing of being qualified and hurt financially by candidates who were not qualified and popular has become a disgrace and treacherous sedition doing harm to the Constitution and all qualified candidates in an open rebellion against our Republic; and this is an action for Congress, of the magnitude of Watergate. More importantly at first, for the Senate Judicial Committee to hear, that a stop and clarification can be chartered according to law and Congressional hearings debated heretofore. If this is not done, the Judicial Committee's actions of the past in resolute for the Constitution's demands of qualifications are invalid, and a treachery of the most malicious sort prevails against The People's Representatives of the Constitution according to 6 persons in the FEC, and Congress be damned and by that The People of the United States, our entire political and election system, and the Republic for which we stand.

3- While the unfortunate claim of racism to conduct hearings of qualification on Mr. Barack Obama might be whispered as a pitfall towards any who gave Sen. John McCain a pass, albeit 'non-binding' in 511, and forsaking the House and a President's signature to become Constitutional, the statutory law of which I have testified and witnessed in Judicial Review, have painfully been excruciating for the Constitution assaulting the entire population, and the memories of those who have given all. My testimony is one of principle over party and is representative of all men equal under the law of which, I believe, is of great worth for the harmony of fellow men in the United States and for the security of the Republic.


My hope is that the confidence and trust of Congress's recent historical disapproval ratings in the public eye can be healed by forthrightly conducting hearings of verification for constitutional qualification of the Office of the President, assuming the burden on the many shoulders of Congress rather then any particular Federal Judge or Judicial Court where political election contention is a curse for professional judicial life. I would be happy and honored to testify to the Judical Committee and submit any and all verifications of my sworn testimony and complaints in this matter.

In my assertions Congress has authority to remove any such treachery and sedition under U.S.C. Amend. XIV Sect. 3's "Disability language" and U.S.C. Amend XX.

Most importantly, although Sen Hatch is a ranking member, the Constitution is sworn to by oath by both Democrats and Republicans. This opportunity to weigh in on the matter, between other candidates, my self and Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan , in legal review of the FEC, provides a new angle that may be of benefit. Ultimately, 2 generations was the ideal of the founders in the unique and distinct qualifications for President veres Representives or Senators especially because of the Executive Powers and the treachery involved with foreign assaults from within that we must be ever vigilant for in our National Security conserns.

Politically, I keep hope up that Sen Hatch would live up to his oath, and his own State Tea Party directive with fellow Senator Bennett's fate in 2010. Nothing would sure up the defense of Sen. Hatch for the Constitution then a direct rececommendation for diliperation and testimony for he is my U.S. Senator,and I appeal from a position of direct harm in the 2012 race, and assert the issue needs to be weighed on by Congress for the Judicial Branch cannot bear the burden alone.

I may be reached by phone at 801-497-6655 (please delete phone if reprinted or published)Leave a message at USA Legacy Entrees for me to return your call with a number.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

cc:
The Post & Email
WND
The Manning Report
Constitutionalist United For Liberty
Email Orrin
Home / Contact / Email Orrin
Contact Form
Thank you for contacting me via my website, Cody Judy.

I created this webform because I was concerned that important comments, questions, and requests would get lost in the immense flood of e-mail correspondence. The new system categorizes and organizes my incoming mail more efficiently, enabling me to respond more quickly and without the risk of losing messages in the shuffle. If this new format does not suit your needs, you are more than welcome to call, fax, or mail a letter to my office in the future.

If you provided me with the contact information requested on the webform, I will reply to your message by mail. As you might expect, the convenience of e-mail has significantly increased the volume of correspondence I receive, and I regret that I am unable to respond personally if you are not a Utah resident. Again, thank you for sharing your views.

Sincerely,

________________________________________
Please Print this page for your records:

First Name: Cody
Last Name: Judy
Email Address:codyjudy@hotmail.com
Phone:801-497-6655
Address 1:3031 So Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Address 2:
City:Ogden
State:Utah
Zipcode:84403
Topic:Election
Your message:
Dear U.S. Sen. Hatch: Att: Mr. Tom Jipping As Counsel for advice on procedural meetings with Representative Sen. Hatch as the ranking member of the U.S. Senate Judicial Committee, and his pledge and stand in doing such for the Constitution, could you please arrange a meeting for me to discuss the following that I would bring to the Senate Judicial Committee? 1- The FEC's recent stand against the Constitution in regards to allowing anyone to solicit money in a run for President without regard to that person's constitutional qualifications to do so, per age restriction and natural born citizen requirement, representing a fraud to those contributing money and services for the candidate in that specific proposal. The six commissioners of the Federal Election Commission are being tasked with a Constitutional question: Can a foreign-born citizen run for President of the United States? Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan would like to file papers, take campaign contributions, and collect federal matching funds for his candidacy. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON DRAFT ADVISORY OPINION (http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/1185406.pdf ) This is something that Congress has already ruled upon with hearings as recently as 2000. I am also a candidate in 2012 for the Presidency, and am not only offended, but hurt financially by this, based on my own campaigns loss of revenue from potential contributions that basically are given under false pretenses to an unqualified candidate. This is fraudulent action perpetrated upon the voter and citizen contributing unawares of the candidates total lack of verification of qualification at the FEC level. A simple action by Congress mandating the FEC demand all candidates sign a statement under penalty of perjury as to their qualifications would go a long way in clearing this up. The Judicial Branch could then also have a breach of qualification standard with the candidates signature and penalty affixed of perjury. As an expert witness in this, my testimony would be valuable to Congress and the public trust in the American Election process for the following reasons: 1- I ran as a candidate for President in 2008, thus had what is called 'standing'; I was in the race and was hurt by action subverting the Constitutions qualifications and demands of that particular political race. The campaign I ran as a qualified candidate was hurt by the foreign born birth of candidate Sen. John McCain and I levied a law suit in the Nevada Federal District Court against Sen. McCain and against non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 as an unconstitutional breach of the Constitutional Demand for a President's Qualifications. I have written and received many responses from Sen Hatch on the issue of his believing the 14th Amendment made null and void the demand of a 'natural born citizen' for the office of the President. Nothing could be further from the truth as the term Citizen used in the 14th Amendmt has nothing to do with the particlar demand of NBC in Art. I Sect 2 , Clause 5 as Congressional hearings in 2000 report. The result of that law suit disparaged nearly half of the country's vote because, though it was filed before the candidate became the R Parties nominee, the Judgment didn't come until after Barack Obama was a declared winner. I should mention that before Judgment came Barack Obama's qualification short comings were also made known in the law suit to the Court by submitting the entire argument being heard by the United States Supreme Court conducted by Esq. Phil Berg, whose standing become the base of the high court dismissal. I have also been a party to other law suits regarding the matter including a submission of my entire McCain law suit and Obama's qualification in a Motion for Joinder in a California case. I have also filed 3 Amicus Curaie's on the matter and testified under oath in a trial sanctioned by the 10th Amendment where Sen. Obama was found guilty of fraud and sedition by a jury of citizens from across the country who came together unawares of each other. I am the only Presidential Candidate to do so under oath in history as far as I am aware at this time. 2- As a candidate my standing of being qualified and hurt financially by candidates who were not qualified and popular has become a disgrace and treacherous sedition doing harm to the Constitution and all qualified candidates in an open rebellion against our Republic; and this is an action for Congress, of the magnitude of Watergate. More importantly at first, for the Senate Judicial Committee to hear, that a stop and clarification can be chartered according to law and Congressional hearings debated heretofore. If this is not done, the Judicial Committee's actions of the past in resolute for the Constitution's demands of qualifications are invalid, and a treachery of the most malicious sort prevails against The People's Representatives of the Constitution according to 6 persons in the FEC, and Congress be damned and by that The People of the United States, our entire political and election system, and the Republic for which we stand. 3- While the unfortunate claim of racism to conduct hearings of qualification on Mr. Barack Obama might be whispered as a pitfall towards any who gave Sen. John McCain a pass, albeit 'non-binding' in 511, and forsaking the House and a President's signature to become Constitutional, the statutory law of which I have testified and witnessed in Judicial Review, have painfully been excruciating for the Constitution assaulting the entire population, and the memories of those who have given all. My testimony is one of principle over party and is representative of all men equal under the law of which, I believe, is of great worth for the harmony of fellow men in the United States and for the security of the Republic. My hope is that the confidence and trust of Congress's recent historical disapproval ratings in the public eye can be healed by forthrightly conducting hearings of verification for constitutional qualification of the Office of the President, assuming the burden on the many shoulders of Congress rather then any particular Federal Judge or Judicial Court where political election contention is a curse for professional judicial life. I would be happy and honored to testify to the Judical Committee and submit any and all verifications of my sworn testimony and complaints in this matter. In my assertions Congress has authority to remove any such treachery and sedition under U.S.C. Amend. XIV Sect. 3's "Disability language" and U.S.C. Amend XX. Most importantly, although Sen Hatch is a ranking member, the Constitution is sworn to by oath by both Democrats and Republicans. This opportunity to weigh in on the matter, between other candidates, my self and Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan , in legal review of the FEC, provides a new angle that may be of benefit. Ultimately, 2 generations was the ideal of the founders in the unique and distinct qualifications for President veres Representives or Senators especially because of the Executive Powers and the treachery involved with foreign assaults from within that we must be ever vigilant for in our National Security conserns. Politically, I keep hope up that Sen Hatch would live up to his oath, and his own State Tea Party directive with fellow Senator Bennett's fate in 2010. Nothing would sure up the defense of Sen. Hatch for the Constitution then a direct rececommendation for diliperation and testimony for he is my U.S. Senator,and I appeal from a position of direct harm in the 2012 race, and assert the issue needs to be weighed on by Congress for the Judicial Branch cannot bear the burden alone. I may be reached by phone at 801-497-6655 (please delete phone if reprinted or published)Leave a message at USA Legacy Entrees for me to return your call with a number. Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODE4PRES cc: The Post & Email WND The Manning Report Constitutionalist United For Liberty
http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email-orrin#form_1152f439-86c2-43a7-b45c-d16ac1e50ea5

Dick Morris Thanks and Your Counsel

Dick Morris author: "Revolt!: How to defeat Obama and his Socialist Policies:








and:













Dear Mr. Dick Morris:

A friend of mine thought it would be prudent of me to seek your counsel, and from what I've seen I think she's right. Wither you felt I was worth it might be a different story? What caught my attention was your openness of commentary in both the republican and democrat parties, which I thought was pretty smart, when I read "Obama may pull out".
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/obama-might-pull-out/

In reading that, I wondered if you even knew about my candidacy for President in the Democrat Party formally announced Aug 25th,2011 with the FEC, which has been covered nationally here by the The Post&Email, and which is raising a lot of concern with the State Democrat Parties such as Iowa's Caucus, as I announce to them my opposition of an Obama coronation declaring my full intention of challenging Obama in a Democrat primary and extensively challenging Obama's eligibility to be President with the professional research that has been done by document experts now showing his long form birth certificate to be a forgery and pieced together. The response from disillusioned Democrats has been moving.

It goes without saying that this brought up in a Democrat Primary or the Caucuses, could embarrass the Party so bad and put some fuel rods in the Republican armor for a General Election that Obama's charismatic words could never recover from . Of assurity, my unique status in bringing this up within the Democrat party is interestingly anchored in spotlighting McCain's own ineligibility I took into the Nevada Court prior to the National Republican Convention as an Independent Candidate in 2008. From this position, Democrats have an easier feeling of calling me true to the Constitution for including McCain as the beginning. That beginning is with broad strokes covered in this recent blog entry "Presidential Candidates 2012 One Question? How Could the Elect be Deceived?"
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/09/2012-presidential-candidates-one.html


Of course if Obama does not run, or for any reason chose to bow out, the issue would presumably die into the history books, and Obama might take a place in history as an eligible candidate, who no one could take down fast enough to erase his pre conceived legitmatacy, which sets a disastorious un-constitutional precedent.

The relevancy of Obama's legitimacy as an unqualified candidate, rest at the foundation of all that is important to American's today; our national security may be compromised, our treasury unnecessarily spent, our borders compromised with a Saudi Arabia funded implant setup to divide America and then to destroy Israel. How important was it to stand up for the Constitution Republican Candidates of the 2012 class with those very real political points?

They, the Republicans, missed this one. They certainly would no more like that hung around their necks then they would like the tag of missing 115,000 Russians marching into Afghanistan in 1979 would they? It speaks of a disaster being missed, like Katrina, on their watch.

So I wonder from your commentary place of wisdom wither you know about this up-coming turmoil within the Democrat party and wither your editorial reflected the desire for Republicans to face someone like Hillary Clinton in the Democrat party rather then someone like me? I presume now if you didn't, you now do.

It is a very interesting political season, and wither you care to comment, please let me say I really did enjoy your commentary on the 2012 GOP debate last night, and thought you were spot on. I certainly hope Mitt Romney becomes the Republican nominee because I've got a stack of ignored emails to him asking for his help to clean up the GOP's support of McCain painting the GOP into the corner from which the 2012 Candidates find themselves muted now on the eligibility issue by their own vote.

I would be very interested to hear from you and what you thought of this with your counsel for my campaign, and certainly will take no offense to your silence. My thought was if you should be compelled to offer any advice from the vocals of your heart in the sincere love you have for America and the Constitution, that is the binding tie between 50 States in America, I would always be appreciative.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube 125 Videos: CODE4PRES

2012 Presidential Candidates- One Question Only? How Could the Very Elect be Decieved?

2012 Presidential Candidates- One Question Only?
How Could The Very Elect Be Deceived?

The following article has appeared over and over in conservative circles and blogs and to the authors credit much can be said about the poignant truth it points to. However, isn't it fundamentally true also that the authors of articles such as this have some kind of cohesive bond with the points they represent? If it isn't true, then we can assume they are simply writing for writings sake and do not fully believe they're own words.

"2012 Presidential Candidates - One Question Only" seen in its entirety on this link.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/09/20/2012-presidential-candidates-one-question-only/by JB Williams
(Sep. 20, 2011)

— As the 2012 election cycle heats up, the most pressing issue facing our nation today is the reinstatement of the U.S. Constitution as the Law of this Land, and the survival of our constitutional republic, complete with sovereign borders, the rule of law, states rights and a republican form of government guaranteed every citizen by the Constitution. There is no more pressing issue in America today…

As reinstating the U.S. Constitution is the highest priority of the 2012 election, and the fact that reinstating Article II requirements for the office of president is first and foremost in the effort to reinstate the constitution as the supreme law of this land, all presidential candidates must face the most vital question of the day.
Before being entrusted with the most powerful political office in our land and the world for that matter, I have only ONE question for every candidate seeking the office of President of the United States.

Based upon the mountain of evidence available which has proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama II is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, and is therefore, ineligible for the office of President according to Article II – Section 1 – Clause V which clearly states – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”- and as a candidate with legal standing to challenge the legitimacy of any fellow candidate, will you challenge Barack Hussein Obama’s right to even appear on the 2012 ballot?

Every candidate for the office of president has the legal standing to challenge Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office he is seeking re-election to in 2012.

The fact that Democrats were able to trick Americans into voting for an totally ineligible candidate in 2008 has no bearing on the fact that the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on American voters cannot be allowed to continue.


CRJ Inserted Comment:
Wait just a minute; Here we go with the bait and switch. According to JB a natural born citizen has parents who are citizens and are born in the United States. John McCain has repeatedly been given a pass by JB Williams even though McCain was born outside the United States in the foreign nation of Panama. How can you have it both ways JB, prosecuting Obama but not McCain and standing up for all the Republicans whose vote was lost on an unqualified candidate as well as Democrats? JB makes every apology for McCain given his parents were serving in the military and our Constitutions Founders would have excused him too?

Our Founders knew very well about military wars in foreign lands, yet their only exception was also placed into the Constitution as "or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution" which was the grandfather clause for the Founders themselves.

Its a well known fact, McCain orchestrated the non binding U.S. Sen. Res 511 which declared him a 'natural born citizen' in 2008 before Obama was made a nominee of the Democrat party, so how was this a trick of the Democrat party JB?

I'm a natural born citizen JB and I didn't need Congress to tell me so but McCain actually has repeatedly been told by Congress he was naturalized. Yes,.. it was in1937 that Congress passed an Act making children born prior in the Panama Canal Zone citizens. McCain was born in 1936 11 months to early and 100 yards too short as you might say.

This is the 'naturalization' process McCain fell under. He was not born in a military hospital. McCain's forthrightness to make his documents available in 2008 doesn't make it any more legitimate constitutionally speaking. That’s like saying the robber of the bank Voters Credit Union should be let go because he told them he was going to rob the bank ( McCain) instead of not telling them (Obama).

Of course my own law suit against McCain and the RNC before he was made the nominee by the Republican Party was filed and served in plenty of time, so we could say with JB's logic, that this was the 'trick' used to cover for McCain in order to make him the R nominee, because no one breathed a word about the law suit at the Republican National Convention and all the leaders new about it... even Mitt Romney.

My post here isn't to try to place blame on either R's or D's, but to accept reasonably the Constitutional Error by both parties towards the American People, who expect them to preserve and protect the Constitution but many in The Birther Movement refuse this truth. My law suit was not ruled upon until after the election was over and all the votes had been wasted on candidates who were not qualified. Indeed we can hardly expect a Fed. District Crt. Judge to rule upon or against the American People entirely, but we could hope that if they had been deceived about their candidates that to protect our elections we could have found one judge to put a stop to it, but we didn't, even though complaints were filed in time by a candidate in the race.

Indeed prophetically, we must ask how Matt 24:24 ' the very elect might be deceived? ' could possibly happen in our modern day world. Obama was in the White House and I as the only candidate in the 2008 election to sue both McCain and Obama that could withstand the 'racism' charge leveled by the media against anyone daring to charge Obama was ignored and was not supported even by Birthers.

Flash Forward to 2012 do we see any Republican Candidates standing up against Obama's Eligibility? No not one who had anything to do with the 2008 Elections or judicially challenged McCain or Obama. Do you think we know why? Well if you want BIG you have got to recall Donald Trump and the Long Form Birth Certificate uncovering, he claimed to unearth, as a service to all of us, but at what price? Bob Schieffer, Whoopi Goldberg on the View, all tagged him a Racist. Do you not think that every Republican Candidate was watching that ‘racist tag’ placed on Donald Trump especially when the polls showed huge support for him as a candidate and Trump leading the race he was only considering?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1381527/Donald-Trump-racist-Bob-Schieffer-attacks-Apprentice-host.html

The very real truth was Republican Candidates got the message very clearly. You challenge Obama on eligibility and we (the media) have a very good claim of racist charges against you and is that really so hard to see when you remember McCain in that equation? Remember those charges are not thrown about lightly and there isn't a Republican Candidate who could stand up against them either, no candidate could. The evidence supports those who gave McCain a 'pass' quietly painted themselves into a corner of the room and couldn't get out no matter how big the gorilla in the room was, they lost their political might.

Further down JB Williams writes:
"The people responsible for the 2008 fraudulent election of Barack Hussein Obama II must be brought to justice. Every 2012 candidate is in a position of legal standing to end the charade."

Let me say I couldn't agree more, and you would think that having said this JB Williams might have written a word about my candidacy doing exactly that, not only as a crow bar against Republican Candidates muted silence, but for the principle of the matter in great excitement but it’s clear he only wrote that to try and strong arm the 2012 candidates who are silent rather then support one who isn’t.

Please don't forget JB that Mitt Romney was a candidate in 2008 and falls under that justice you’re talking about. Jon Huntsman was working as Obama's Ambassador in China and had money and power to bring it to the front. Ron Paul was a candidate and as well as Michele Bachmann was a Congressmen in 2010 when the House became Republican, but not one single jot or title towards "Qualification hearings of the ineligible Obama", even with his own release of a forged document, and disqualifying revelation of his foreign father. Congressmen Paul called Obama’s eligibility a ‘distraction’. Did I miss anyone, The maybe of Sarah Palin; was McCain's Vice President choice, she couldn't bring it could she?

Well, if principle was made over party, one might see she very well could have, and didn't. Is it any surprise to anyone Marco Rubio, also having a foreign born father naturalized when Marco was approximate 4 years old is seriously being courted by the GOP as an access door to the Latino Vote again away from principle?


Again in the Bible Matt 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. I've been thinking about this and its hard not to see that those people we 'elect' are indeed 'shepherds' of our Constitution swearing with an oath to preserve and protect it. How could the elect be deceived? The shepherds let down their guard? What if the shepherds were the elect?

So many have placed the emphasis on deceit, and seen the elect as who? Certainly not our Elected Officials? Why not? Has there ever been so much fraud and forgery we have seen witnessed in Obama's long form birth certificate and all of the U.S. House and all of the U.S. Senate, our elected officials and shepherds, silent? If you want a modern day prophesy fulfilled to your own eyes asking how that the elect could be deceived, you might just have seen a revelation of the Bible fulfilled in our 2008-2011 Congress and all the Presidential Candidates in 2012 , save one.


For those so stunned by these revelations, it’s nothing new. We've all known this and seen it as an inconvenient truth. What can and should be done about it is about what I hope you'll listen to and it really wouldn't take that much effort by a small number of people reminiscent of our American Revolution.

If everyone in The Birther Movement would circle their wagons around me as a 2012 Candidate, of which I am registered legally with the Federal Election Commission, we could push our way in to the Democrat Primaries very easily by registering as Democrats and voting for me in the Caucuses and Primaries as well as contributing to my campaign which you can do by making a check out and sending it to :
Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden , UT. 84403

With just a little support from everyone, I'm almost positive Obama will not make it to the 2012 General Election. If he does and Republican's think they can beat him without raising the 'TRUTH' as a standard of our Constitution, then they are really no better than Obama himself as for sweeping dirt under the carpet. If your okay with that dirt, the issues of freedom and liberty in our individual rights also in the Constitution your sacrificing by silent dismissal.

This support needs to happen now. Many People forget that the Primaries happen starting as early as late January and early February for Iowa, New Hampshire, even Hawaii. Wouldn't it be great to defeat Obama in Hawaii with a presentation that shows what a fraud and forgery his identity is? Don't think Democrats are all bad people because of Obama anymore then Republicans are all bad people because of McCain, they were both ineligible and I can hammer that message through with power and the stand I took in 2008 as evidence.

Please everyone that may read this, you can do your part. If you’re not able to send any cash, you can write JB Williams and others informing them of their leadership ability and voice that is needed here and now supporting my candidacy. I have worked tirelessly on my campaigns in 2008 and now in 2012 because I believed in your ability to support the principles I have supported in the race for President. What I'm asking you to do now is believe in yourself enough to support what we represent already.

JB Williams said "

"But every candidate for the office of president has legal standing to challenge the constitutional eligibility of any competing candidate and at least one candidate must have the courage to do it, or none of them deserve the support of the American voter." ,and, "If there is not a single candidate with the backbone to take a stand, then our nation must endure a horrific era of social strife in order to one day return to its foundational principles and values. If there is no candidate with the backbone to stop the treasonous fraud against the constitution and the people, then leaving the fraud in office is the best strategy.", What may be said of American's not supporting the one candidate who is standing against the treasonous fraud and leaving him in office? How do you feel about calling yourself a treasonous fraud of America’s Constitution? It doesn’t sound real good does it?


That is why the question comes down to "Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is JB? And are You?", as good ole Uncle Sam might point and say. Its a question everyone of us must ask. As I've stated before are you willing to write a check out for $20 or $50 or $100 or whatever you can because I'm in it for all I have, and nothing is going to change that.

Most conservatives have heard of my campaign already as The Post & Email has very patriotically covered here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/08/30/cody-robert-judy-files-papers-to-run-for-president-as-a-democrat/and here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/15/the-post-email-speaks-with-cody-robert-judy-presidential-candidate/

Here is my web site

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube Station is : CODE4PRES
The vision of our founders provides for us the principles we can believe in. That is why I included in my formal FEC Organization name our United States Constitution. May God bless America's Patriots who are reformative revolutionist for the U.S.C. that has made America's Economy and can restore America's Economy with principle over party? Please review a couple of letters from JB Williams to me below as well as Bob Schieffer's and Whoopi Goldbergs comments of racism. Understanding McCain's pass by Republicans explains their hesitency against Obama's Eligibility, because of the label Trump received by the Media.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, UT. 84403

For those interested I am posting a couple of the emails I have received from JB Williams in 2009 in the good faith that shows he does not respect one of the two prong test in Natural Born Citizen. That of being born in the United States. The reason for this as you can surmise is he has justified Sen. John McCain's foreign soil birth with an excuse of military parents which our Founders neither sanctioned or placed in the Constitution knowing and having much experience with military wars in foreign lands. Their exception: ' or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution.'

This is JB's fruitless stand to try and make the Eligibility Demand of the Constitution a partisan stand, rather then a Constitutional Stand. To his chagrin Republicans as I told him in 2009 would never raise the issue because it had become a racist stand because of their support for Sen. John McCain who was 'naturalized' in 1937 by an Act of Congress specifically for those born there. McCain was born 11 months too early and 100 yards to far away so to speak, and not born in any military hospital, not to mention as well, the 2008 non binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 declaring John McCain a Natural Born Citizen without approval by the House or signed by a President. Nothing speaks more highly of the non natural born citizen John McCain as two acts of Congress glaring in the sun light of 'naturalization' because Natural Born Citizens don't need acts of Congress telling them they are natural born citizens. The law speaks out against the Republicans forsaking the Constitution and then covering it up with their loss to Obama which may have been well deserved because of their own abandonment of the Constitution.

Below are two letters received from JB Williams were from 2009, long before Donald Trump was called a 'racist' by the mainstream media Bob Schieffer, Whoopi Goldberg and many others. Those charges blast the racism charge upon all the Republican Candidates of 2012 if they dared to mention Obama's ineligibility making what I told JB Williams in 2009 true and way ahead of the politics of that time. Here's a quick review of Bob Schieffer and Whoopi Goldberg.

Bob Schieffer an ugly strain of racism running through the Bither Movement.


Whoopi Goldberg " Is it because he's BLACK?"




From: JB Williams (jbwilliams09@gmail.com)
Sent: Sun 10/18/09 6:00 PM
To: cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)


You're an idiot to waste so much time and effort on John McCain. I have no choice but to believe that you are less than honorable in your intentions. McCain has no dual loyalties, no more than most scumbag politicians in DC today, all of whom need to fiund a new career.

Obama is quite a different story... and instead of focusing on the enemy in front of you, you waste your time with someone of NO concern at all.

That leaves me with the belief that you and I are NOT on the same side in the battle for the future of this nation.




On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:23 AM, cody judy wrote:

http://proliberty.com/observer//20080624.htm

The real story
From the beginning, the story of JS McCain III’s birth is suspect. The argument that he is not qualified to be president because he was not born on sovereign U.S. territory has merit. Additionally, as this research reveals, both of his parents may have been foreign nationals and the same controversies surround the true identities of JS McCain I and JS McCain II—his "grandfather" and "father."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:04:21 -0500
Subject: Re: The LAW :RE: Crazy Birthers? You've heard of the women, MEET THE MAN.
From: jbwilliams09@gmail.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com

I am out of patience for your nonsense. You are ignorant and rude, yet entirely convinced that you are a genius on the basis that were able to read someone else's opinion and agree, without looking any further at the facts. That's a horrible combination and one not welcome around here.

You did NOT quote a single law. You referred to the Law of Nations, which is NOT US law. Even worse, instead of quoting the Law of Nations, you quote Vattel as if his opinion is an authority on the matter, and then quote him poorly. Having said that, here's where you are right and where you are wrong.

1) "That the “natural born Citizen” clause is based on undivided allegiance and loyalty can be seen from how the Founders distinguished between "citizen" and "natural born Citizen." "

CORRECT - Native and natural are two different things as well. Look them up.

2) "This distinction is based on the law of nations which became part of our national common law."

WRONG - The Law of Nations influenced the Founding fathers and there design, including Article II of the Constitution and the general foundation of "natures laws" as the supreme power in this land. But the Law of Nations were never incorporated as "part of our national common law."

(A quick review of The Law of Nations found inside our Constitution JB)



3) "According to that law as explained by E. Vattel"

First, Vattel wrote an "opinion" based upon his interpretation of the Law of Nations. In doing so, he completely ignored the history driving the writing and passage of that law, namely, establishing that a "natural born child" of the Royal Family would be such, no matter where they were born, as a matter of bloodline, not birth place. Further, you cherry pick Vattel, ignoring this statement "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;" and this one "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country." from Vattel.

4) The 14th Amendment is NOT related and has NO bearing on the matter - CORRECT!

5) "Never having been changed, the original constitutional meaning of a "natural born Citizen" prevails today."

CORRECT AGAIN! But instead of reading Vattel, you should try reading the Law of Nations and the history behind it. If you do that, you will learn that Vattel had an opinion different than the text and history of the Law of Nations.

6) "Not holding McCain to the law and holding Obama to it at the time of his birth with his 17 year old mother not a U.S. Citizen long enough to give her son U.S. Natural Born Status before marrying into Kenya and British allegience, is or must be racist? It is the only conclusion?"

DEAD WRONG and overtly childish. It has nothing whatsoever to do with race. It has to do with the fact that McCain is the natural son of TWO American parents and Obama is NOT. Nothing else... Like all good leftists, you want it to be about race. If that makes you sleep better, knock yourself out. But if Obama was purple and McCain was green, McCain would still be the son of TWO US citizens and Obama still wouldn't be. Your problem isn't that I hold Obama accountable on this basis, because you do too. Your complaint is that I don't hold McCain accountable for the same offense, but that's because McCain is not guilty of the same offense.

The difference is McCain has always been 100% US Citizen and the natural son of of TWO US citizens, with NO sign of foreign loyalties anywhere in hi life or that of his parents. Obama has always been the son of an Arab-Muslim from Kenya. As even Vattel points out, "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;" and this one "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

(This statement by JB assures all that he has forgotten about being born in the United States and the natural affection one will always have for their place of birth. One of the two prongs in the natural born citizen qualification demands)

You are a racist, because your judgment is blinded by the issue of race.... my position is color-blind.

( How could I be seen as 'racist' if I sued both McCain and Obama for not fullfilling the Constitutions demands for Natural Born Citizen. McCain fails within the United States, Obama fails of Citizen Parents. exclude one and you open the door for a racism charge, or a reverse racism charge, sue both and you have a Constitutional Claim that is equal under the law)

Last, any time spent on McCain is wasted time. You are arguing that a man who will never be president, can't be president. Meanwhile, another man who really can't be president, is president, and he's busy destroying this nation while you play with yourself over McCain...

Leftists raised the question about McCain, to distract attention away from their own candidate on the matter. It worked... look how much time and energy you have wasted chasing McCain, who will never be president with or without Article II.

( It could be said that those who were against the Constitution were excusing McCain far before Obama became a democrat nominee for President. Ignoring that is turning a blind eye on the reason all the Republican Candidates dont' raise the eligibility issue as you cry about in your 2011 article- "2012 Presidential Candidates - One Question Only" seen in its entirety on this link.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/09/20/2012-presidential-candidates-one-question-only/by JB Williams
(Sep. 20, 2011)


That's it... Your 15 minutes are up. I have no more time for you. You are free to be wrong if you like. Don't waste anymore of my time with it though. And if Obama stays in office because Americans can't figure out the 1st Grade definition of "natural born citizen," people like you will share the responsibility for the damage done to this nation as a result.

END OF DISCUSSION!

JB, your 15 minutes continues, but in October 2009 you hoped the Republican candidates would raise the issue, but they didn't and you still fail to see the reason why? Maybe someday, you'll get it and start supporting someone who was right, instead of wrong, and quit debating right or left.

Obama's Challenger Prying into the Democrat Iowa Caucuses Cody Robert Judy's Berlin Wall Call

CNN's iReporthttp://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-675034

Viva NewsObama's Challenger Prying into the Democrat Iowa Caucuses Cody Robert Judy's Burlin Wall Call


Prying into the Democrat Presidential Primaries and Caucuses is much harder with an Incumbent President then it looks. Cody Robert Judy's campaign is having to do just that to a very unfriendly Democrat party who for all intensive purposes wants a carination for Obama rather then a primary challenger. The reputation of the high walls surrounding an incumbent is proving harder to tear down then Ronald Reagan's June 12,1987 challenge to Mikhail Gorbachev when he said regarding the Berlin Wall, "Tear down this wall".

The following email from the campaign illustrates that Mr. Judy has asked nicely to be included with no response from the Iowa Democrat Party for either Mr. Judy's request to receive email list of fellow Democrats who may be considered as Delegates at Caucuses or for his campaign to included on web sites naming those contending in the Caucuses. In the Republican corner you have most of the big named candidates receiving press and invited to the debates, but under the Democrat side Obama remains unchallenged despite contrary evidence at the Federal Election Commission who list The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C Eligibility Campaign as a registered organization with Cody Robert Judy as a listed Democrat for President in the 2012 Race.

The question remains unanswered by the Democrat National Committee who often list on their 'Candidates for Office" link those who intend to run for office. This National Site www.democrat.org is the go-to site from which affiliated sites trust to update with registered challengers. Since Judy's FEC Registration on Aug 25th, 2011 and announcement letter of Aug 27th,2011 to 50 Iowa State Democrat party and Caucus leaders Mr. Judy has been unable to scale the high walls although his candidacy is qualified and eligible in every way.

Mr. Judy remarks " For all intensive purposes for which I am committed to be a choice for Democrats, the party at this time, is acting as a party of exclusion rather then a party of inclusion, and if the trend continues, I will be forced to take the action into Court proceedings for damages and unfair campaign practices by these party leaders. They will leave me little choice as they seek to disparage my campaign from the Caucuses and Primaries as if there was no such thing for an incumbent President to be challenged and it was their official duty to not recognize me rather then provide for Democrats the stage for candidates."

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility campaign has sent to the Iowa State Chair Sue Dvorsky and 2nd Chair Chris Petersen in Iowa as well as the Democrat National Committee a "Notice of Intent to Commence Action" should the discrimination towards his campaign continue with the cold shoulder towards his campaign and obvious endorsement of Barack Obama's with such things as Obama's logo plastered all over their web sites showing obvious bias and discrimination towards Mr. Judy's campaign.

"You know everyone in a campaign works very hard to get a campaign off the ground. We have money and thousands of hours that have gone in to organization, web sites, policy meetings, Print and Sign development, Television Radio and Internet commercials and social media's programs, and anyone who has been involved in a campaign knows this and how much work it takes. That's why it is so hurtful that when you get all that done and registered officially, a few party leaders decide discriminate against you. You know if they had to pay for it all they might be a little more understanding. We might have to go into court and get a Judge's Order or even a Judgment of damage to change the way these guys are working. I don't want to do that. I would much rather just be treated fairly and to be welcome by these leaders as to have them pulled into court for discrimination against me. I'm sure if you asked Obama he'd tell you he knows what I'm talking about.", said Mr. Judy, " This is not the respect that has come to be a tradition of the Democrat Party, its a shame and its got to change now."





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: codyjudy@hotmail.com
To: webmaster@iowacaucuses.info; info@iowademocrats.org; sdvorsky@iowademocrats.org; cpetersn@netins.net
CC: jawlawoffice@msn.com
Subject: Please include under Democrat Primary Caucus Cody Robert Judy
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:29:34 +0000


Democrats (http://www.dnc.org/)

Dear Iowa Caucus Information, Iowa State Chair Sue Dvorsky & 2nd Chair Chris Petersen :

As an FEC registered and qualified Democrat Challenger to Obama in the 2012 Presidential Race, I would respectfully request that Democrat.org list my candidacy on all sponsored web sites, and if Obama's logo is going to be used that mine also be shown equally.

I respectfully request the the Democrat Party Caucus in Iowa list my candidacy in the Iowa Caucus on any such site advertising such equally, or place my name as a Primary Challenger to Obama on the Democrat site www.democrat.org such that sites like this http://www.iowacaucus.biz/ , that take their information off of Democrat.org can be updated and informed.

I have informed every major party chair and Caucus in Iowa as to my intention to compete as a challenger in the Democrat Iowa Caucus therefore:

I send this as a Notice Of Intention to Commence legal action against the Iowa Democrat Party and DNC if my campaign is further disparaged by unfair campaign practices.


Thank you for this immediate attention. My intent is to simply be treated fairly in the Democrat Nominating process.

Cody Robert Judy FEC # P20003372
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Elibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/candidates.phtml

Cody Robert Judy of Utah
• FEC P20003372
• Declaration of Intent of Candidacy: Thursday 25 August 2011
• Campaign website: http://www.codyjudy.us/
• Address: CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2012 U S C ELIGIBILITY CAMPAIGN; OGDEN, UT 84401


Would you please update this site by including my campaign under the Democrat Caucus? I am registered with the FEC as an official challenger for Obama in the Democrat Primary and respectfully request you list my legal challenge and qualified challenge on this page

http://www.iowacaucus.biz/

Cody Robert Judy

cc: www.democrat.org
The Post & Email
WND


This site claims to be non-partisan as such:

This is a bi-partisan website. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the creators or sponsors and are subject to revision at anytime.

Individuals wanting to link to this site may do so by requesting a reciprocal link exchange via webmaster@iowacaucuses.info.

Letter to Schedule Meeting with R Lamar Smith Chairmen of House Judiciary Committee

Dear Ashlee Binyard:

As the Administrative Aid for scheduling meetings with Representative Lamar Smith in his Chairmanship of the House Judicial Committee, and his pledge and stand in doing such for the Constitution, could you please arrange a meeting for me to discuss the following that I would bring to the House Judicial Committee?

1- The FEC's recent stand against the Constitution in regards to allowing anyone to solicit money in a run for President without regard to that person's constitutional qualifications to do so, per age restriction and natural born citizen requirement, representing a fraud to those contributing money and services for the candidate in that specific proposal.

The six commissioners of the Federal Election Commission are being tasked with a Constitutional question: Can a foreign-born citizen run for President of the United States? Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan would like to file papers, take campaign contributions, and collect federal matching funds for his candidacy.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON DRAFT ADVISORY OPINION (http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/1185406.pdf ) This is something that Congress has already ruled upon with hearings as recently as 2000.

I am also a candidate in 2012 for the Presidency, and am not only offended, but hurt financially by this, based on my own campaigns loss of revenue from potential contributions that basically are given under false pretenses to an unqualified candidate. This is fraudulent action perpetrated upon the voter and citizen contributing unawares of the candidates total lack of verification of qualification at the FEC level. A simple action by Congress mandating the FEC demand all candidates sign a statement under penalty of perjury as to their qualifications would go a long way in clearing this up. The Judicial Branch could then also have a breach of qualification standard with the candidates signature and penalty affixed of perjury.

As an expert witness in this, my testimony would be valuable to Congress and the public trust in the American Election process for the following reasons:

1- I ran as a candidate for President in 2008, thus had what is called 'standing'; I was in the race and was hurt by action subverting the Constitutions qualifications and demands of that particular political race. The campaign I ran as a qualified candidate was hurt by the foreign born birth of candidate Sen. John McCain and I levied a law suit in the Nevada Federal District Court against Sen. McCain and against non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 as an unconstitutional breach of the Constitutional Demand for a President's Qualifications.

The result of that law suit disparaged nearly half of the country's vote because, though it was filed before the candidate became the R Parties nominee, the Judgment didn't come until after Barack Obama was a declared winner. I should mention that before Judgment came Barack Obama's qualification short comings were also made known in the law suit to the Court by submitting the entire argument being heard by the United States Supreme Court conducted by Esq. Phil Berg, whose standing become the base of the high court dismissal. I have also been a party to other law suits regarding the matter including a submission of my entire McCain law suit and Obama's qualification in a Motion for Joinder in a California case. I have also filed 3 Amicus Curaie's on the matter and testified under oath in a trial sanctioned by the 10th Amendment where Sen. Obama was found guilty of fraud and sedition by a jury of citizens from across the country who came together unawares of each other. I am the only Presidential Candidate to do so under oath in history as far as I am aware at this time.

2- As a candidate my standing of being qualified and hurt financially by candidates who were not qualified and popular has become a disgrace and treacherous sedition doing harm to the Constitution and all qualified candidates in an open rebellion against our Republic; and this is an action for Congress, of the magnitude of Watergate. More importantly at first, for the House Judicial Committee to hear, that a stop and clarification can be chartered according to law and Congressional hearings debated heretofore. If this is not done, the Judicial Committee's actions of the past in resolute for the Constitution's demands of qualifications are invalid, and a treachery of the most malicious sort prevails against The People's Representatives of the Constitution according to 6 persons in the FEC, and Congress be damned and by that The People of the United States, our entire political and election system, and the Republic for which we stand.

3- While the unfortunate claim of racism to conduct hearings of qualification on Mr. Barack Obama might be whispered as a pitfall towards any who gave Sen. John McCain a pass, albeit 'non-binding' and forsaking the House and a President's signature to become Constitutional, the statutory law of which I have testified and witnessed in Judicial Review, have painfully been excruciating for the Constitution assaulting the entire population, and the memories of those who have given all. My testimony is one of principle over party and is representative of all men equal under the law of which, I believe, is of great worth for the harmony of fellow men in the United States and for the security of the Republic.


My hope is that the confidence and trust of Congress's recent historical disapproval ratings in the public eye can be healed by forthrightly conducting hearings of verification for constitutional qualification of the Office of the President, assuming the burden on the many shoulders of Congress rather then any particular Federal Judge or Judicial Court where political election contention is a curse for professional judicial life. I would be happy and honored to testify to the Judical Committee and submit any and all verifications of my sworn testimony and complaints in this matter.

In my assertions Congress has authority to remove any such treachery and sedition under U.S.C. Amend. XIV Sect. 3's "Disability language" and U.S.C. Amend XX.

I may be reached by phone at 801-xxx-xxxx (please delete phone if reprinted or published)

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

cc:
The Post & Email
WND
The Manning Report
Constitutionalist United For Liberty