The Abduction of Justice in the Rape Tape of Congress

The Abduction of Justice in the Rape Tape of Congress’s Eligibility Absence

The following is a factor in the Congressional tape placed over the Obama ineligibility that is a rape of our Constitution by Representatives and U.S. Senators. What evidence would support the Congressional tape to be a Congressional rape?

From Haiti comes an example of what happens to a society when justice is denied, when honor is forgotten, and when the actions represented mirror double standards and moral misbehavior in the seats of power eroding support for the organization. What exactly is happening in Haiti that correlates with the profligacy of Congress?
The U.S./U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice says she is “disturbed” for a whole range of reasons after a recent visit to Haiti, including allegations of a number of rapes by U.N. workers of the women in Haiti.

And she said charges of rape by peacekeepers in Haiti, which U.N. sources confirm could number more than a dozen, have deeply eroded support for the organization’s efforts to stabilize the environment of security.

“Allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse by some mission personnel have badly eroded support (for the U.N.) and undermined its work,” she said. “We are deeply troubled by these allegations and expect the United Nations to redouble its efforts to prevent any further incidents and to hold those responsible, accountable.”
One might wonder how society would indeed feel about the prisoners convicted of rape being installed as the police in every city and town. As the horror of law enforcement morphs into a decayed state of perpetrators upon the standard of law, support quickly erodes for said Law Enforcement Agencies.

Such is the responsibility of Congress to remove an ineligible person as a ‘disability’ from a known rebellion against the Constitution with a vote of two-thirds of each House according to U.S.C. Amendment XIV., Sect. 3, Clause 1.
What else but an insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution could Obama’s ineligibility represent?

Insurrection is defined as a violent uprising against an authority or government; Rebellion, uprising, or insurrection is a refusal of obedience or order. It may, therefore, be seen as encompassing a range of behaviors aimed at destroying or replacing an established authority such as a Constitutional Republic.

Violence against the Constitution to which a previous oath had been administered and taken is defined as rebellion. No greater rebellion exists than to state one is eligible for the Office of the President upon fraudulent and forged documents of identity placed on the table of honor. Is that something Democrats and Republicans and Independents can agree upon?

The lack of progress in Congress in recognizing what more and more Americans are seeing, and bleating, and blogging in things like the Georgia Superior Court fiat endorsing Obama as an eligible candidate to be on the Ballot in the face of Georgia law, the Constitutions demand for a natural born citizen, and in the face of law enforcement agencies actual commissioned ‘cold case posse’ findings that probable cause exist of fraud and forgery on a number of identification documents recognized worldwide to be released from the hand of the occupier, is tantamount to eroding the trust of the people.

Not quickly holding those responsible with hearings and investigations of the same is tantamount to eroding the public trust while watching the rape of law abiding citizens.

Men, women, and children raped of the decency of the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen by Congress; in session, out of session, but mostly agreeing with the incest-taboo tendency that the Constitution doesn’t demand one who is born in the United States to citizen parents and really not giving a damn about Sheriff Joe’s cold case posse conclusion in a six month investigation that probable cause exist that Obama has multiple identification sources forged.

Why haven’t The U.S. Representatives and The U.S. Senators in charge of the respective Judicial Committees called for immediate hearings issuing subpoenas for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s cold case posse investigation results to be brought before them? http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/

Why haven’t the U.S. Representatives and The U.S. Senators in charge of the respective Judicial Committees called for immediate hearings issuing subpoenas for Cody Robert Judy’s testimony in the Georgia Superior Court as a Presidential Candidate asserting legally with standing the facts against Obama’s eligibility as seen in these documents for the sake of integrity within the Presidential Race:

1- Motion and Memorandum to Proceed pro se (1711 reads 11 pages)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82225733/Cody-Robert-Judy-Georgia-Pro-se-Motion-Memorandum-Doc

2- Motion for Disjoinder ( Necessary step that the Court informed me needed to be done immediately if they didn't respond- Roth, MacLaren, and Lax didn't) ( 4 pages 180 Reads)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82908355/Motion-for-Disjoinder-in-Farrar-Judy-v-Obama-Kemp

3- Emergency ExParte Sua Sponte Motion for Summary Judgement for Stay (359 reads 12 pages) http://www.scribd.com/doc/82936654/Emergency-Exparte-Sua-Sponte-Motion-for-Summary-Judgement-for-Stay-in-Georgia-Ballot-challenge-Farrar-Judy-v-Obama-Kemp

4- Response To Motion To Dismiss ( 319 reads 18 pages)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/83474362/Response-to-Motion-To-Dismiss-Barack-Obama-Georgia-Ballot-Challenge
Are they intent at eroding the rule of law into a lawless state where rape and plunder replace civility?

5- Emergency Exparte Motion for Reconsideration to Response to Motion to Dismiss w Ex (200 Reads in 1 day)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/83864212/Motion-for-Reconsideration-in-Farrar-Judy-v-Obama-Kemp-Georgia-Superior-Crt

One thing for sure; Congress maintaining their present course of hears no evil, sees no evil, does no evil is certainly the course that will continue to erode the trust they have been given by the American people in much the same way as the U.N has eroded the trust of Haiti citizens who looked to them for peace and found nothing but the abduction of justice instead of the adjudication of justice.

This Georgia eligibility case is the very first in the Nation to link officially the law enforcement agency of a Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" six month investigation and findings of "probable cause" that Obama's long form birth certificate released by the White House is a fraud and that Obama's draft registration was also a fraud.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEATURE
Jan.27th,2011 Video

A Birther Consolidation Behind My Campaign- Cody Robert Judy

MY COMMENT TO:


Obama eligibility: reactions to ruling

http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/02/04/constitution/obama-eligibility-reactions-ruling/#comment-6451
I sure enjoyed the article, keep up the good work. Just for a reference and also as a Plaintiff in the Georgia case with Orly Taitz Esq., here was my letter to Sec. Of State Brian Kemp.

http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/02/cody-robert-judy-ltr-georgia-sec-of.html

As I read some of the comments I thought that the biggest problem facing The Birther Movement is a consolidated advertising force behind a specific candidate.

The reference to McCain in this article, [Likewise, the Senate resolution somehow “declaring” that Senator John McCain, R-Arizona, was a “natural-born citizen” could have no force or effect. Only a Constitutional amendment could possibly suffice for that. ], should not be under-valued, as he received first his "Citizen" status by an Act of Congress and second his "Natural Born Citizen" status by a second Act of Congress. The process is called "naturalization", and I believe the failure of many birther attorneys is to recognize the haphazard racist quagmire that is an easy leap by the Media when this is understood.

I sued McCain as a Presidential Candidate and Obama in 2008 so don’t fall into the trap set by the Media for the ‘racist’ label. That is an asset to the Birther Movement that has been unrealized.

The Birther Movement should consolidate its efforts and get behind me in a informing political advertising campaign made legal with my bid for President in 2012.

Failure on this issue may be laid at the table of the American People who are Birthers and have failed to contribute $5 to my campaign. If every Republican and Independent did, as well as at least 1/3 of the Democrat Party Obama has laid waste to, the Constitution would not fail and our campaign would be bigger and better funded than Mitt Romney or Obama.

Knowledge is the key and word of mouth is free. A Presidential Candidate can advertise at reduced rates and any network could be sued big time for a great deal of money if they denied a Presidential candidate from advertising in a discriminating way.

The problem has been a disagreement on how to bring the public into the arena of Obama’s ineligibility and the solution is now understood.
Please contribute to my campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us




Cody Robert Judy

Swenson Takes A Swipe at Orly's Clients on The Manning Report- Update

Update of Mr.Swensson response in Update Post I and my response in Update Post II can be seen scrolling down.

Carl Swensson Takes Obama To Court For Real
Interview of Dr. Pastor Manning with Carl Swenson represented by Hatfield Esq.
Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGh2AyVfB2Q&list=UUR6prZ4gShuBbA60Cns0nVw&index=5&feature=plcp
At 2 min to 2:40 min

Comments to Video

Mr. Swensson seems a little bitter to Orly Taitz and her clients that I am apart of. Its seems a shame that Mr. Swensson would loft himself into a degenerative state about myself (Cody Robert Judy) as a Presidential Candidate when he should know the 9th Circuit ruled that Presidential candidates have the best standing to challenge the case, not to mention all the Campaign work , traveling to New York and testifying in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in New York, and Orly happened to request all the docs first.

Code4Pres 1 second ago


Patriots attempt to deride one another in a show of superiority that isnt' consistent with the facts, we hurt the cause in general. I for one am greatful Mr. Swensson as a concerned citizen made it known through the legal channels of his State, however lest Mr. Swensson forget there are 50 states and his testimony can't be used in all 50 , mine can. Lets stay together on this folks we have a ways to go.

Code4Pres 1 sec ago in playlist Uploaded videos

Reply

Mrs. Orly Taitz has been a real champion for this fight, a thorough, and dedicated Attorney fighting not only in Georgia but also in New Hampshire along with me. I see no reason at all why in review of the hearing Orly should not be given credit for bringing upon the Judge much more weight to the Judges mind of criminal wrong doing in the eligibility of Barack Obama, making it much harder for him not to grant the Default to us, and also make clear the very important case that Obama has indeed sought to cover up his ineligibility with actions that are criminal.

Orly's arguments were slated as 3rd because they were so thorough and she had so many more expert witnesses testifying. While Mr. Hatfield's Esq. and Mr. Van Irion Esq. arguments are strictly on the natural born citizen requirement and avoid the illegal actions Obama has taken, the burden of those illegal actions are no doubt red meat on a Judges shoulders for misprision of felony and that no doubt is much harder to shuffle off in an ineligibility argument.

There can be no dispute Orly Taitz has learned through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, that has enlightened everyone, that Presidential Candidates have greater standing than legislatures, retired military personal, active military personal,citizens, and Obama's relatives. We work very very hard on our campaigns to ensure an argument for our cause is won in "Competitive Standing" meaning we have to keep up a rigorous and demanding appearance of a competitive campaign in case the argument comes that would rival Mitt Romney's or Newt Gingrich's campaigns, but we don't have the funding they do. That means much more work on our part that we don't get paid for.

For me that has been a nice looking credible 50 page web site, having positions on just about every issue on Earth that are accessible to the media, reporting to the FEC, Fundraising,traveling, YouTube Station with 142 Commercials and Video as an authority on the eligibility issue since 2008 and law suits on both candidates in 2008 that took up a tremendous amount of time and money, Amicus Curia's filed in the Supreme court and on behalf of Lt. Col Terry Lakin, and much more including responding to questions from every lobbyist organization on the planet.

The fact that Mr. Swenson doesn't really know me kinda shows us all that he's maybe doing what he accused me as a Presidential Candidate of doing, "grandstanding".

The biggest difference is, I've got a lot of battle scars from the front lines since 2008 that Mr. Swenson hasn't even seen. I am the only Presidential Candidate running in 2012 who remains out of the class of 2008 that has formally charged Mr. Obama as ineligible in the entire United States. I've got Obama's tire tracks run over me allready in 2008, I don't need yours too.

Please Mr. Swensson, please tell me you at least read Mrs. Taitz argument and that a good portion of the reason I am listed on the complaint is because the Democrat Party Leaders refused to put me on the ballot, and hopefully that is not only rectified judicially, but is articulated any time you speak about me again when it comes to this case.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES


Post Note I. - Jan. 27th 2012:

From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@HOTMAIL.COM
CC: atlah1@aol.com; pb_realestate@yahoo.com; dean@deanhaskins.com; htansey@t-room.us
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:19:01 -0500


Dear Cody Judy,

I do have regrets that I mentioned her and her case in a negative way and can offer no excuse since any difference I have must be delivered in person. That situation did not occur yesterday though I was fully prepared for that. What you saw was my frustration at not being able to deliver that message.

As to what went on yesterday… It has taken 2 years of constantly getting before my State reps with special emphasis on Brian Kemp, to get these challenge hearings established which he did. For that I will forever be in his debt as a voter and now staunch supporter. His assigning this Judge meant a very special alignment of the stars had just occurred and the opportunity to get, on open record, the issue of nbC status which we did. That has been and remains the focus of my efforts. Remember, this was a challenge hearing, not a court case. Orly did use this as a platform to get her issues on record but has never acknowledged the hard work of others to make this day happen. Yeah, I find that a bit disconcerting and again, that’s unfortunately, what came out.

My thinking, whether some feel it’s flawed or not, is to take the direct approach to get him off the ballot based on the only pleadings that could be applicable in this hearing. If or once that occurs, the criminal issues will necessarily follow and that is where She can do the most good. ALL the records are now entered into evidence and both Mark and Van did a masterful job of crafting them submitting them and entering them. Both were extremely careful to draw the line of separation between what we were doing and what Orly intended to do. Only Mark put forth the motion to shift the burden of proof from the Plaintiff’s to the Defense and that has yet to be ruled on. If we get a favorable ruling on that one point alone, all future Pres. Candidates will have to put up or shut up when seeking their name placement on GA’s ballot.

So, in closing, I’d like to offer you my apology for making the derogatory statement concerning her actions in court. I reduced myself in that moment. We are all in this fight and I agree this type of infighting is uncalled for. My bad.

Please share with everyone on your list.

Sincerely,

Carl Swensson

Post Note II Jan. 27th, 2012:

Dear Mr. Swensson,

As for me, I appreciate so much all the efforts you and those associated with you gave to the defense of our Constitution Jan 26th,2012, and all the time that you have put forth in this effort for as long as you have.

It certainly is my only desire to encourage everyone to do the same. As I said, we have a long way to go and a few more States are necessary for sure. Not all the States have the same laws as Georgia, in which case as we did in New Hampshire it required going into open court which is much more expensive and time consuming.

Hopefully we all can work together. I accept your apology and hope that you will remove from your web site the dis-spirited remark you made of Mrs. Taitz ( That she was embarrassing which as the second inconsideration I saw associated with you) in the consideration that we have 50 States to go and the efforts of all our attorneys are deeply appreciated. We can't afford to fall into the trap of calling each other the names that the media calls us. We all have our weaknesses and we should not prey upon one another in this manner.

Certainly the matter of separating the cases is a legal position your attorneys can take, but I feel strongly that dis-association with each other will not help our cause, or enable us to proceed faster.

I will forward your sincerity with appreciation to you. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed and the only reason I was moved to make a defense about it is because it was made a YouTube Video and that record will remain forever. We can't erase it so many copies get down loaded and transferred to other sights that its impossible to contain. I wouldn't have made the effort I did in making it a BLOG piece of mine if that wasn't the case.

Unfortunately when we estrange each other in these situations it is all used against us by the opposition. We really need to keep in mind that we are all under the banner of our Constitution and the Glory of each of all our efforts be to God. For in this light we will prevail and he will prepare the way before us making us strong where we are weak.

I admired and applauded the many interviews you did and featured them very profoundly in our efforts together positively. This is my best wish for you and I hope you for me because together we are stronger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icENBpyzmVQ&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&index=2&feature=plcp

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
YouTube: CODE4PRES




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:21:51 -0500


I have posted my public apology to Orly on my web site and highlighted it so that all will be sure to see it. Crow for breakfast, crow for lunch.., look forward to a regular meal.
http://riseupforamerica.com
I must now make a Public apology for words I used, in a deragatory fashion, concerning Patriot Orly Taitz. We all make mistakes and that one was a real boner on my part. I do hope Orly will accept my apology as we are ALL in this fight together
Carl

The good Lord has nothing but good to say about our eating crow. God Bless you Mr. Swensson, it takes a bigger man to apologize than to hold tight that which makes us small.

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy asked, "Is the Democrat Party Doomed in light of Georgia?"

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S. C. Eligibility Campaign is the campaign committee honored to represent Cody Robert Judy who is also a patriot courageously standing up for the Constitution in the Atlanta Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearings represented by Orly Taitz, as a Democrat in the disregard of the demands of the Constitution by Barack Obama.

Proceedings in the hearing were concluded around 11 am Jan. 26th, 2012 and Cody Robert Judy twittered comments regarding the proceeding during the hearing which can be viewed at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com .

For a reporters view of the hearings:

A very good blow by blow of the hearing held is found here

Also,Dr. Jerome R. Corsi of WND reported on the hearing here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/
Sharon Rondeau reported from the Post & Email here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/26/georgia-ballot-hearing-under-way/

From the Huffington Post we see a head line that was searing in its nature about the contempt Obama has for the rule of law-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/obama-birther-case-georgia_n_1225304.html
Obama Birther Case In Georgia Unlikely To Bring The President, Despite Judge's Order.

“I was sadly disappointed for America to see the arrogance of Obama and his attorney to boycott the hearing after responding with a “motion to quash the Subpoena” on record and a second attempt to run around the whole proceeding with a document letter to Georgia Sec. of State Kemp which also was responded to.” , said Mr. Judy.

When asked about how the Democrat Party should feel about Obama’s boycott, “ As far as the Democrat Party is concerned I am embarrassed about Obama’s behavior in a very simple request to produce some documents that have never been produced and to address the concerns I have represented in my complaint along with Georgia Citizens. Obviously not all Democrats boycotted the hearing, I was there represented and I feel representing the Constitution for the Democrat Party. Remember we are all Americans under the Constitution.”

“The concern I have is that all of America will think that the Democrat Party is representing an example of snubbing a court of law if things don’t go your way with a couple of motions you get denied, that is not the case, and Obama is not representing the values and principles of America the Democrat Party is accustom to representing.” Cody Robert Judy said.

When the Democrat Candidate for President was asked what he thought would be the outcome of the hearing he said, “Well, if I were in the Judges place and I realized first hand Obama’s attorney had responded to the Subpoena and also been warned by the Secretary of State in Georgia that boycotting the hearing might be a bad idea, I would have to consider all the evidence presented on its face value as un-challenged by Obama and or his representative Attorney and thusly fact if it was comprehensive to law and rational understanding. In that light, not only recommend Obama not be allowed on the ballot due to his ineligibility of not being a natural born citizen, but I would have to certify my contention that a criminal investigation was needed due to the crimes being represented in social security fraud, identity fraud or perhaps be guilty of misprision of felony myself.”

“It seems Obama has no empathy or moral code to throw as many people under the bus as he can. Those who have been run over find themselves having to go along or be tried for sedition or treason themselves. This narcissism knows no bounds and victimizes everyone around him including very sadly his family.”

“If it hasn’t become clear to the American People by now it should be very clear now that we have in the White House a man who not only is not qualified, but has known he was not qualified, and made every effort to make us think otherwise. This is the essence of fraud, forgery, and deceit. If the leadership of the Democrat Party continues to align itself with such principles it will find itself extinct. I have offered a reasonable choice and extended my hand for the sound principles America was built on and to represent to everyone the Democrat Party is alive and well with the standard of the Constitution.”

“I would encourage all Democrats to see the writing on the wall and understand the Titanic did sink when it struck the iceberg that was infinitely bigger than the ship. As such our Constitution and America and all those who have died and do now fight for our Constitution is infinitely bigger than the corruption of Obama’s actions as one man.”

“It is time to jump into the life boats, and begin representing a clear and Constitutional choice in my candidacy, which is clearly a clean message compared to the mainstream Republican Candidates who we see are very willing to sweep the dirt under the carpet, as well as our Constitution, and that’s not the President’s job or oath!”




Cody Robert Judy website can be seen at www.codyjudy.us , his blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com , and 142 videos on his YouTube Station CODE4PRES.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES