New Update on SCOTUS 24th Conference Judy v. Obama 12-5276

The interest in this is to be applauded, and I thank you for tuning in. Its a really wonderful thing when Americans start tuning in to what the United States Supreme Court is doing, and the interest generated specifically in this case has been terrific.

Our campaign is posting the following information for the benefit of those interested. We hope these links and the information is helpful, and that you have a great night and continue to tune in!

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Camp.


http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/09/change-in-orders-release/

[ Change in orders release (UPDATED)
UPDATE 12:45 pm. The new early release procedure will be followed on all days when a regular Order List is due to be released, and not just on days when the Court will be sitting. With that policy going into effect tomorrow, presumably that means that, if there are grants out of today’s Conference, they will be made available at 9:30 am Tuesday. Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30 am.

——————-

In the Supreme Court’s new Term, soon to open, the Justices will follow a new routine in the release of orders when the Court is sitting. On those days, the list of orders will be made public at 9:30 a.m., rather than 10 a.m., the custom for many years. The Court announced the change in a news release Monday morning; it can be read here.

The Court explained the switch by saying that, on days when the Justices take to the bench, the release of the orders a half-hour earlier will give the public, the press, and attorneys more chance to review the Court’s actions before the public sitting begins.

The change will take effect tomorrow morning.

The Court’s Term formally begins next Monday, when oral arguments resume. The Court is meeting in a private Conference this morning to decide which new cases, if any, will be granted for review in the new Term. The Court has released its calendars for oral argument for the October, November, and December sittings. ]

[ORDER]
For Immediate Release For Further Information Contact:
September 24, 2012 Kathleen L. Arberg 202-479-3211


Beginning with October Term 2012, the regularly scheduled Order Lists of the Supreme Court of the United States will be released by the Court at 9:30 a.m. rather than at 10 a.m. as had been the previous practice. On days when the Court is in session, the change will provide members of the Supreme Court Bar, the public, and the media an opportunity to review Order Lists before the Court sits at 10 a.m.

Regularly scheduled Order Lists are typically issued on each Monday that the Court sits. On occasion, regularly scheduled Order Lists are issued on days that the Court is not sitting. The issuance of such a list is announced in advance. Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order Lists will continue to be posted on the Court’s Website (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications.

The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25, 2012.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/09/this-week-at-the-court-85/
This week at the Court
On Monday, the Court meets for the “Long Conference” to consider petitions on the summer lists. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference is available in three installments (here, here, and here). We expect the Court to issue grants from its Conference on Tuesday morning and will report on those grants and any other actions by the Court as soon as possible.

Cody Robert Judy makes a comment on Orly's Q. to Newt on Politico Article

POLITICO HIGHLIGHTS

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/02/newt-goes-positive-encounters-orly-taitz-114382.html#comments

My COMMENT on POLITICO

For all those comments that have 'jacked' the Birther Movement, which is really the Constitution's demand for a good reason, and don't tell me any of you haven't benefited enormously from The Constitution as well as realizing it’s the only doc that binds 50 States together without which we'd be looking like the Europe or Africa right now, your arguments smack of ignorance. Obama's Eligibility has never hit a Judicial Court yet on the merits, those 100 or so you all say we lost, was due in part because Obama got the jump in 2008 and no one knew he would be the nominee until late. 2012 is a little different; we head him off at the pass objecting to his being on any State Ballot.

The worst thing about the degradation of Birthers is thinking that somehow Obama has the right to use a fraudulent social security number that makes a failure in our own E-Verify System, and backs that up with that long form fabrication. I mean who are you all defending and if you’re defending them why don't you let out all of the guys in prison and protest them being in the joint that have stolen identities and defrauded people like your Grandmother!

And don’t pull that easy ‘racist’ card out like you haven’t done a days’ work in your life. I’m a plaintiff in the Georgia Case. The administrative hearing in Georgia was the very FIRST trial ever that evidence was documented on the merits of Obama’s identity fraud and dual citizenship that prohibits his White house occupancy. Now that was not really a Judicial Court but was an Administrative Court.
That action however was a necessary hurdle that we never had the opportunity to clear in 2008. You all tell me someone who jumps the gun in a race and heads off 50 yards down the track is going to win. Oh yeah, he might win the 100 yard dash, but we are gonna catch him in the 440.

Gosh, do all these Anti-Birthers have some grudge against keeping America’s elections free of corruption? Obama is not a natural born citizen and neither was McCain who lied to everyone and said he was born in some military hospital in Panama. He was born on foreign soil in a foreign hospital and it took an Act of Congress to make him a Citizen and another Act of Congress to make him a Natural Born Citizen. That’s the process we call ‘naturalization’ and it has nothing to do with the laws of nature. Yes it affects both parties and guess who promoted McCain’s Eligibility? That’s right Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama.

Now would you please tell me why, with that ounce of brain you have left that has a conscience?

And before you all pounce on me as some racist, please bear in mind that I was the only Presidential Candidate that sued McCain first… and then Obama in 2008. It is a Constitutional issue, not a racist one. So get over it and educate yourselves on the facts that we don’t want foreign allegiance in the highest office of the United States! Reason why? It’s much easier to use our nukes against our own people in a black mail game against the whole Congress, and drain the treasury. Does that sound like a National Security problem to you? Yes and it’s a BIG ONE.

Obama’s spent more now in our treasury than all President’s combined from George Washington to H.W. Bush. What? Do you all want to see the first part of that conspiracy theory come true before you’ll believe? I mean nearly 5 Trillion dollars is a heck of a big down payment on believing. Don’t tell me you wanna see a mushroom cloud in New York City. That is not cool, and neither are these attacks on Patriots who are defending the same Constitution that all of our servicemen have died for. Don’t make their sacrifice moot in the argument to conceal corruption Nixon wouldn’t have thought of doing.

The Troubling Questions Formed by The Media Black Out in Georgia

How long will the Media Black Out confiscate the intelligence of America’s Citizenry?

The story would be that in the first time ever that expert witnesses were called to testify and a compilation of facts was submitted to a Court of Law that is recognized in our Judicial Branch of Government, Obama coward in his secret chambers and didn't suit up as a player on the field. With nothing particularly important on the schedule watching the live-streaming feed coming out of the court room provided by those bypassing the thumb-hold media he had corralled Obama was the cascading clown being made fun of in the Courtroom with multiple identities.

As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder shook their heads looking on the unimaginable event transpiring in the thoughtful agitation of knowing when it blew, their political careers would be blown out of the water with the despotism of comradery collapsing upon the greatest sham to ever hit American politics: Barack Hussein Obama

Why oh why had they not heeded their inner instincts? Why oh why had they crossed the line of principle and value? How had they lost the integrity of America in the glittering sea of Washington DC power and elitism that had crafted their political demise under the banner of what had come down as an acid rain instead of a banner of protection: The Constitution of The United States?

Had they actually become 'Domestic Enemies' to the Light House on the hill that the world looked to as a beacon of hope, freedom, and liberty? Did they look with admiration upon The United States Constitution that bound the 50 States together in a Republic for which 300 million Americans pledged allegiance or did upon inner reflection they look upon it as the piece of furniture they actually had come to despise in the American house? When had the end come not to the rescue in order to justify their means, or was there a choice now that had to be made upon the innocent, the dumb, the stupid, the poor who needed them in order to live?

Who were these plaintiffs? Citizens who actually thought they could challenge the President? Where had they gone to school and not learned to move with the crowd pushed by a few with cattle prods?

Surely these Plaintiffs were rejects of the Republic that offered not one ounce of sanity or deserved any recognition accept in scorn, dereliction, and banter.
The intelligence of the masses was the media and the media had made a decision in the angst of journalistic integrity and the anxiety of repose to stay the hand of freedom and liberty for the self destructive fist of force. They chose in the site of their Creator and public witness to bite the hand that fed them, and to deliver to the pit that which gave them breath- The banner of The United States Constitution.
Why…Why… Why had that choice been made?

Pride saith, “For me!”

To protect the ‘pride’ that hath no honor, no loyalty, but only has the victuals of leviathan was insane; nevertheless they had indeed chosen their master.

Not one report would be made to expose the depositor and defender of their first Amendment, their civil code forged by their fathers- the Founders and Framers of the United States of America. They would boldly stare down their portraits, their busts, their legacies, the paintings, the sculptures, their words and escape them and place them as ruins of a bygone age of carnival barkers and clowns.

Who knew better than themselves how to govern? Who knew better than to smash the uprising cry of freedom and liberty? And who knew better how to use the weapons under their control? Why, they did; but now all was threatened in the floors, the foundation upon which they had built, the pillars and high hands, the multi-levels stacked upon multi-levels forming the deck of cards they found themselves teetering upon, watching the finger tap-tap-tap, on the lower cards upon which they rested.

What evidence you ask, and who is the Plaintiff running for President in the Democratic Party that lives in Ogden, Utah bringing these complaints to the Obama White House door?

1. Affidavit and testimony of Chris Strunk in regards to Obama’s use of last name “Soebarkah”.

2. Affidavit and testimony by Linda Jordan, that Obama’s Social security number 042-68-4425 used by Obama, that does not pass e-verify.


3. Affidavit and testimony by licensed detective Susan Daniels, showing that SSN used by Obama, was issued to another individual, who was born in 1890 and who resided in CT in 1977.

4. Affidavit and testimony by Felicito Papa, Information Technology expert, who showed that Obama’s alleged birth certificate on line, is a computer generated forgery. Also, evidence that on Obama’s tax returns in 2009 he used the same SSN 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him.


5. Affidavit and testimony by scanning and typesetting expert, Douglas Vogt, that Obama’s alleged birth certificate on line is a computer generated forgery and not a scan of a single document.

6. Affidavit and testimony of retired deportation officer John Sampson, testifying to evidence of fraud in Obama’s birth certificate and social security number, as well as evidence, that Obama possibly immigrated to US together with his stepfather Lolo Soetoro. Mr. Sampson testified that in cases like this he would seek a warrant for an arrest and deportation.


7. Affidavit and testimony of Orly Taitz Esq.’s - that she downloaded Obama’s law license application from on line records, which showed him committing perjury and fraud and hiding his prior last names “Soetoro” and “Soebarkah”. She testified that after she complained to Illinois bar, Obama changed his record from “inactive” to “not eligible to practice law”. She presented it to the judge to show a modus operandi. When she filed a complaint with the Illinois bar, Obama chose to forfeit his law license that was based on an elite Harvard degree all the order to hide his identity for political greed.


When the Plaintiffs served Obama with a subpoena to appear in court and provide certified copies of his long form birth certificate, redacted application for the Social Security card, immigration and naturalization records, Obama chose not to appear in court, he forfeited the whole state of GA with millions of votes, 17 electoral votes and possibly 4 more years in the White House, if other states follow GA, he did it to hide his identity under the last names “Soetoro” and “Soebarkah” and hide evidence of Social Security fraud and forgery.

Who is the Plaintiff bringing these charges to the door of the White House and running for President in the Democratic Party that has challenged Obama’s house of cards?

Cody Robert Judy www.codyjudy.us , www.codyjudy.blogspot.com , YouTube: CODE4PRES and the mainstream Media have a black out on him. What is his Bio? What is his Platform? What possessed him to preserve, protect, and defend The United States Constitution, and what has he done the last 4 years in The Birther Movement?

How long will the Main Stream Media remain silent and the American People subject to the confiscation of journalistic integrity and honor?

What happens to the political chess board if Barack Hussein Obama is removed from the majority of State Ballots starting in Georgia, and more importantly what happens to the political chess pieces employed on the Obama coat tails when such a fabrication was known by those working and associated with Mr. Obama?

These are the questions that form THE MEDIA BLACK OUT.

1- http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/watch-obama-ballot-challenge-hearing-live-on-streaming-video

2- http://www.cedartownstd.com/view/full_story/17337387/article-Cedartown-resident-among-those-filing-lawsuit-against-Obama?instance=home_local_news

3- http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/

4- http://obamaballotchallenge.com/georgia

5- http://libertylegalfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-PowellvObamaOrderonMotiontoQuashSubpoenasGeorgiaBallotChallenge.pdf

6- http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/01/26/constitution/obama-eligibility-challenges-explode/

7- http://www.scribd.com/doc/78893961/Farrar-Cody-Robert-Judy-v-Obama-Denied-Motion-to-Quash

Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearing News

Exactly when did Mr. Obama go over the top of the Constitution? I thought we were all under the law? And since when does a plethora of 'other cases' dismissed on technicalities and never heard on the merits of ‘natural born citizen’ exclude a case argued on the merits? Obama finally has a chance to slam dunk Mrs. Taitz and he doesn't show up? Come on.

Obama Excuses himself from a legal Subpoena rather contemptuously setting the example for Americans to not show up? Than Obama asks the Sec-Of-State of Georgia to pull the case out from under the Judge? Are these the actions of someone who believes in America rule of law or Chaos? With Obama’s example, America should just “not show up” for the 2012 elections either?

This is not what Democrats believe in and I don’t believe the Democrat Party has degenerated in to the lowest common denominator at the highest ranking office. Obama had a duty to show up and slam dunk and debunk the plaintiffs which he refused to do as an admonition of guilt for using someone else’s social security card number, perpetrating a false identity upon the American public, and throwing everyone under the bus who supported him.

The value of an investment in Obama is only as good as it pays off and it appears those who have Obama’s back are going to be big losers. When it comes to fraud and forgery that among his supporters seems perfectly ok, I wonder who among them supports teaching that to their children? Not even the guys in prison would advocate such a thing. It’s time to come clean and recognize a bust and a change of course Democrats. This cover isn’t going to fly and it’s a whopping slap in the face on Americans and the Republic for which we stand.


Obama stated during the release of his long-form-fabrication that we were "not going to be able to solve our problems if we got distracted by side-shows and carnival barkers' and that, "We do not have time for this kind of silliness- We got better stuff to do- I’ve got better stuff to do”.

It would seem that defending himself from fraud and forgery were not high priorities on the merits, and the escape route of filing a motion to quash and a written letter asking the Sec-Of-State of Georgia were silly as when it came down to cross examining witnesses and submitting evidence to the rebuttle Obama was the silly one, and Obama was the side-show, and Obama was the carnival barker, and Obama had better things to do then submit to the rule of law he in fact had requested to.

Imagine a president who fights his own battles? Wouldn't that be a site to see.

1- http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-considered-default-against-obama/


2-http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-considered-default-against-obama/





3-http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/georgia-birther-hearing-obama_n_1236719.html?ref=politics

Swenson Takes A Swipe at Orly's Clients on The Manning Report- Update

Update of Mr.Swensson response in Update Post I and my response in Update Post II can be seen scrolling down.

Carl Swensson Takes Obama To Court For Real
Interview of Dr. Pastor Manning with Carl Swenson represented by Hatfield Esq.
Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGh2AyVfB2Q&list=UUR6prZ4gShuBbA60Cns0nVw&index=5&feature=plcp
At 2 min to 2:40 min

Comments to Video

Mr. Swensson seems a little bitter to Orly Taitz and her clients that I am apart of. Its seems a shame that Mr. Swensson would loft himself into a degenerative state about myself (Cody Robert Judy) as a Presidential Candidate when he should know the 9th Circuit ruled that Presidential candidates have the best standing to challenge the case, not to mention all the Campaign work , traveling to New York and testifying in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in New York, and Orly happened to request all the docs first.

Code4Pres 1 second ago


Patriots attempt to deride one another in a show of superiority that isnt' consistent with the facts, we hurt the cause in general. I for one am greatful Mr. Swensson as a concerned citizen made it known through the legal channels of his State, however lest Mr. Swensson forget there are 50 states and his testimony can't be used in all 50 , mine can. Lets stay together on this folks we have a ways to go.

Code4Pres 1 sec ago in playlist Uploaded videos

Reply

Mrs. Orly Taitz has been a real champion for this fight, a thorough, and dedicated Attorney fighting not only in Georgia but also in New Hampshire along with me. I see no reason at all why in review of the hearing Orly should not be given credit for bringing upon the Judge much more weight to the Judges mind of criminal wrong doing in the eligibility of Barack Obama, making it much harder for him not to grant the Default to us, and also make clear the very important case that Obama has indeed sought to cover up his ineligibility with actions that are criminal.

Orly's arguments were slated as 3rd because they were so thorough and she had so many more expert witnesses testifying. While Mr. Hatfield's Esq. and Mr. Van Irion Esq. arguments are strictly on the natural born citizen requirement and avoid the illegal actions Obama has taken, the burden of those illegal actions are no doubt red meat on a Judges shoulders for misprision of felony and that no doubt is much harder to shuffle off in an ineligibility argument.

There can be no dispute Orly Taitz has learned through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, that has enlightened everyone, that Presidential Candidates have greater standing than legislatures, retired military personal, active military personal,citizens, and Obama's relatives. We work very very hard on our campaigns to ensure an argument for our cause is won in "Competitive Standing" meaning we have to keep up a rigorous and demanding appearance of a competitive campaign in case the argument comes that would rival Mitt Romney's or Newt Gingrich's campaigns, but we don't have the funding they do. That means much more work on our part that we don't get paid for.

For me that has been a nice looking credible 50 page web site, having positions on just about every issue on Earth that are accessible to the media, reporting to the FEC, Fundraising,traveling, YouTube Station with 142 Commercials and Video as an authority on the eligibility issue since 2008 and law suits on both candidates in 2008 that took up a tremendous amount of time and money, Amicus Curia's filed in the Supreme court and on behalf of Lt. Col Terry Lakin, and much more including responding to questions from every lobbyist organization on the planet.

The fact that Mr. Swenson doesn't really know me kinda shows us all that he's maybe doing what he accused me as a Presidential Candidate of doing, "grandstanding".

The biggest difference is, I've got a lot of battle scars from the front lines since 2008 that Mr. Swenson hasn't even seen. I am the only Presidential Candidate running in 2012 who remains out of the class of 2008 that has formally charged Mr. Obama as ineligible in the entire United States. I've got Obama's tire tracks run over me allready in 2008, I don't need yours too.

Please Mr. Swensson, please tell me you at least read Mrs. Taitz argument and that a good portion of the reason I am listed on the complaint is because the Democrat Party Leaders refused to put me on the ballot, and hopefully that is not only rectified judicially, but is articulated any time you speak about me again when it comes to this case.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES


Post Note I. - Jan. 27th 2012:

From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@HOTMAIL.COM
CC: atlah1@aol.com; pb_realestate@yahoo.com; dean@deanhaskins.com; htansey@t-room.us
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:19:01 -0500


Dear Cody Judy,

I do have regrets that I mentioned her and her case in a negative way and can offer no excuse since any difference I have must be delivered in person. That situation did not occur yesterday though I was fully prepared for that. What you saw was my frustration at not being able to deliver that message.

As to what went on yesterday… It has taken 2 years of constantly getting before my State reps with special emphasis on Brian Kemp, to get these challenge hearings established which he did. For that I will forever be in his debt as a voter and now staunch supporter. His assigning this Judge meant a very special alignment of the stars had just occurred and the opportunity to get, on open record, the issue of nbC status which we did. That has been and remains the focus of my efforts. Remember, this was a challenge hearing, not a court case. Orly did use this as a platform to get her issues on record but has never acknowledged the hard work of others to make this day happen. Yeah, I find that a bit disconcerting and again, that’s unfortunately, what came out.

My thinking, whether some feel it’s flawed or not, is to take the direct approach to get him off the ballot based on the only pleadings that could be applicable in this hearing. If or once that occurs, the criminal issues will necessarily follow and that is where She can do the most good. ALL the records are now entered into evidence and both Mark and Van did a masterful job of crafting them submitting them and entering them. Both were extremely careful to draw the line of separation between what we were doing and what Orly intended to do. Only Mark put forth the motion to shift the burden of proof from the Plaintiff’s to the Defense and that has yet to be ruled on. If we get a favorable ruling on that one point alone, all future Pres. Candidates will have to put up or shut up when seeking their name placement on GA’s ballot.

So, in closing, I’d like to offer you my apology for making the derogatory statement concerning her actions in court. I reduced myself in that moment. We are all in this fight and I agree this type of infighting is uncalled for. My bad.

Please share with everyone on your list.

Sincerely,

Carl Swensson

Post Note II Jan. 27th, 2012:

Dear Mr. Swensson,

As for me, I appreciate so much all the efforts you and those associated with you gave to the defense of our Constitution Jan 26th,2012, and all the time that you have put forth in this effort for as long as you have.

It certainly is my only desire to encourage everyone to do the same. As I said, we have a long way to go and a few more States are necessary for sure. Not all the States have the same laws as Georgia, in which case as we did in New Hampshire it required going into open court which is much more expensive and time consuming.

Hopefully we all can work together. I accept your apology and hope that you will remove from your web site the dis-spirited remark you made of Mrs. Taitz ( That she was embarrassing which as the second inconsideration I saw associated with you) in the consideration that we have 50 States to go and the efforts of all our attorneys are deeply appreciated. We can't afford to fall into the trap of calling each other the names that the media calls us. We all have our weaknesses and we should not prey upon one another in this manner.

Certainly the matter of separating the cases is a legal position your attorneys can take, but I feel strongly that dis-association with each other will not help our cause, or enable us to proceed faster.

I will forward your sincerity with appreciation to you. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed and the only reason I was moved to make a defense about it is because it was made a YouTube Video and that record will remain forever. We can't erase it so many copies get down loaded and transferred to other sights that its impossible to contain. I wouldn't have made the effort I did in making it a BLOG piece of mine if that wasn't the case.

Unfortunately when we estrange each other in these situations it is all used against us by the opposition. We really need to keep in mind that we are all under the banner of our Constitution and the Glory of each of all our efforts be to God. For in this light we will prevail and he will prepare the way before us making us strong where we are weak.

I admired and applauded the many interviews you did and featured them very profoundly in our efforts together positively. This is my best wish for you and I hope you for me because together we are stronger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icENBpyzmVQ&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&index=2&feature=plcp

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
YouTube: CODE4PRES




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:21:51 -0500


I have posted my public apology to Orly on my web site and highlighted it so that all will be sure to see it. Crow for breakfast, crow for lunch.., look forward to a regular meal.
http://riseupforamerica.com
I must now make a Public apology for words I used, in a deragatory fashion, concerning Patriot Orly Taitz. We all make mistakes and that one was a real boner on my part. I do hope Orly will accept my apology as we are ALL in this fight together
Carl

The good Lord has nothing but good to say about our eating crow. God Bless you Mr. Swensson, it takes a bigger man to apologize than to hold tight that which makes us small.

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy asked, "Is the Democrat Party Doomed in light of Georgia?"

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S. C. Eligibility Campaign is the campaign committee honored to represent Cody Robert Judy who is also a patriot courageously standing up for the Constitution in the Atlanta Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearings represented by Orly Taitz, as a Democrat in the disregard of the demands of the Constitution by Barack Obama.

Proceedings in the hearing were concluded around 11 am Jan. 26th, 2012 and Cody Robert Judy twittered comments regarding the proceeding during the hearing which can be viewed at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com .

For a reporters view of the hearings:

A very good blow by blow of the hearing held is found here

Also,Dr. Jerome R. Corsi of WND reported on the hearing here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/
Sharon Rondeau reported from the Post & Email here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/26/georgia-ballot-hearing-under-way/

From the Huffington Post we see a head line that was searing in its nature about the contempt Obama has for the rule of law-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/obama-birther-case-georgia_n_1225304.html
Obama Birther Case In Georgia Unlikely To Bring The President, Despite Judge's Order.

“I was sadly disappointed for America to see the arrogance of Obama and his attorney to boycott the hearing after responding with a “motion to quash the Subpoena” on record and a second attempt to run around the whole proceeding with a document letter to Georgia Sec. of State Kemp which also was responded to.” , said Mr. Judy.

When asked about how the Democrat Party should feel about Obama’s boycott, “ As far as the Democrat Party is concerned I am embarrassed about Obama’s behavior in a very simple request to produce some documents that have never been produced and to address the concerns I have represented in my complaint along with Georgia Citizens. Obviously not all Democrats boycotted the hearing, I was there represented and I feel representing the Constitution for the Democrat Party. Remember we are all Americans under the Constitution.”

“The concern I have is that all of America will think that the Democrat Party is representing an example of snubbing a court of law if things don’t go your way with a couple of motions you get denied, that is not the case, and Obama is not representing the values and principles of America the Democrat Party is accustom to representing.” Cody Robert Judy said.

When the Democrat Candidate for President was asked what he thought would be the outcome of the hearing he said, “Well, if I were in the Judges place and I realized first hand Obama’s attorney had responded to the Subpoena and also been warned by the Secretary of State in Georgia that boycotting the hearing might be a bad idea, I would have to consider all the evidence presented on its face value as un-challenged by Obama and or his representative Attorney and thusly fact if it was comprehensive to law and rational understanding. In that light, not only recommend Obama not be allowed on the ballot due to his ineligibility of not being a natural born citizen, but I would have to certify my contention that a criminal investigation was needed due to the crimes being represented in social security fraud, identity fraud or perhaps be guilty of misprision of felony myself.”

“It seems Obama has no empathy or moral code to throw as many people under the bus as he can. Those who have been run over find themselves having to go along or be tried for sedition or treason themselves. This narcissism knows no bounds and victimizes everyone around him including very sadly his family.”

“If it hasn’t become clear to the American People by now it should be very clear now that we have in the White House a man who not only is not qualified, but has known he was not qualified, and made every effort to make us think otherwise. This is the essence of fraud, forgery, and deceit. If the leadership of the Democrat Party continues to align itself with such principles it will find itself extinct. I have offered a reasonable choice and extended my hand for the sound principles America was built on and to represent to everyone the Democrat Party is alive and well with the standard of the Constitution.”

“I would encourage all Democrats to see the writing on the wall and understand the Titanic did sink when it struck the iceberg that was infinitely bigger than the ship. As such our Constitution and America and all those who have died and do now fight for our Constitution is infinitely bigger than the corruption of Obama’s actions as one man.”

“It is time to jump into the life boats, and begin representing a clear and Constitutional choice in my candidacy, which is clearly a clean message compared to the mainstream Republican Candidates who we see are very willing to sweep the dirt under the carpet, as well as our Constitution, and that’s not the President’s job or oath!”




Cody Robert Judy website can be seen at www.codyjudy.us , his blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com , and 142 videos on his YouTube Station CODE4PRES.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

WND Breaking News Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 Wins Subpoena Battle w Obama

Boy the last few days have been BIG DAYs... GOOD DAYs!



The campaign was featured at The Post and Email in the BLOG OF THE DAY-http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/
, which is a very nice honor as they receive so many.

The campaign was also featured in another publication World Net Daily (WND.com):here


1- Jan 3rd 2012 Obama must be Constitutionally Eligiblehttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/

2- Jan 18th 2012 Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearinghttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-argues-against-appearing-at-eligibility-hearing/

3- Jan 20th 2012 Judge regects Obama demand to quash subpoenahttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/

In an effort to help Americans understand more of what was happening with our Campaign the following email exchanges were made between Mr. Judy and Mr. Unruh. We publish these as a matter of record for all to see so that we don't have to keep responding to individuals who are asking us why Cody Robert Judy doesn't contain a link in the WND articles, which is just basically a consideration of professional consideration in a Presidential Election that would help people link Cody Robert Judy's name with at the very least a link to his web site www.codyjudy.us

We at the here at the Cody Robert Judy Camp would also like to give a BIG SHOUT OUT to Orly Taitz Esq. for a great job in representing Cody with great American Zeal in the Opposition to the Motion to Quash the Subpoena. Obama's attorney got a little quiver in his lip as the Judge denied his Motion with his bully and defamation tactics which were disgusting.

Of course these are small battles and victories but they are moving in the right direction and we certainly can share her celebration for the Constitution's Principles we endeavor to defend as a Plaintiff in the case Farrer v. Obama.




From: codyjudy@hotmail.com
To: runruh@wnd.com
Subject: Again? Will you Please link my name? FW: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:42:17 +0000


Dear Mr. Unruh,

Well, thanks for the updated story however you did it again , not having the courtesty to place a link on my name as a Plaintiff at www.codyjudy.us , and this time you made it sound like all of Mrs. Taitz Plaintiffs are Georgia Citizens...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/
I'd really appreciate your understanding that this is not "all " about Obama being taken off the ballot, but also allowing "other Democrat Candidates" on the ballot. I have been denied on the ballot. A reading of the Complaint makes that very clear but your story is really missing entirely this angle of the complaint.

Thank you for your consideration in this and your attention to the last email I sent you that you promised to address this morning.

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: runruh@wnd.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:27:58 -0700


thanks for your note. am swamped with assignments that need to get finished tonight right now. will take a look first thing in the morning. regards. bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: cody judy [mailto:codyjudy@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:59 PM
To: WND Rpt Unruh; WNDCEO
Subject: Re: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing



RE: Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing


Dear Mr. Unruh;

Thank you so much for covering the story entitled "Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing". Your article was very well understood, the approach, and angle appreciated.

Mr. Unruh, this article represents the second article that my name, Cody Judy, ( I prefer Cody Robert Judy which is also listed in the body of pleadings from my attorney Orly Taitz, as an honor to my father who also served in the army, and to distinguish me from others with the same name.) has been mentioned in the context of the article as a Plaintiff in Farrar v. Obama, which I really appreciate also. I'm running a campaign for President and have been working very hard on exposure and building this campaign for the last 6 months.

If at all possible, I was wondering if you would be so kind as to insert a link on my name at www.codyjudy.us , just as a service for people to see my campaign site, platform, and get to know me a little better at their discretion?

You know I was published today at the Post & Email and received the honor post of BLOG-OF-THE-DAY over there and what I wrote in that article I'd really appreciate your taking the time to read, if at all possible, because you should know after 68 cases dismissed it "Takes a Good Plaintiff ", and I am a good Plaintiff for Orly Taitz for many reasons, a few I mention in this article.

Of course it takes a good lawyer too, but without the Plaintiff there is no case for the Lawyer, and with Obama sitting in the White House you can bet the Judges are doing a little research on the Plaintiffs on their own.

We need to band together as Birthers and help one another fight for our Constitution, and people need to know who they can support that is taking on Obama with "Competitive Standing" don't you think? Some people don't even know what that is or how a candidate achieves it.

Please read this article and I'd be very happy to answer any questions you may have that might come of it.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/

I'm not sure if just being a Democrat and standing up within the Democrat Party is such a bad thing to WND that they haven't mentioned my campaign or if its just because I haven't been elected before, but it would really be an appreciated gesture if WND could at least place a link on my name to my web site for those who are curious and would like to know more.

Of course they can google it if they are interested to, .. I understand that, but I just think that it would say something about WND if they just gave a little respect to those standing up in this case for all of America.

WND has been a leader in the Birther Movement and has spent millions of dollars in campaigns for the public eye and I for one have appreciated that so much I've even featured the Bill Board Campaign and some articles on my Station!

There are expenses to a campaign as your well aware of no matter what, and those expenses must be absorbed by contributors or the candidate. So far I'm the one absorbing the cost as I've only had $435 worth of contributions which doesn't even pay phone bill for 6 months, but I am very greatful for them coming in from TX, NC, NY, MIN.,AZ.,CA.,UT.,FL.,WA.,WY. These are meaningful contributions coming from folks who care a great deal about our Country and our Constitution in tough times. I ask God to bless every one who makes an effort to help and it touches my heart to read notes within them.., " don't let us down", " keep fighting ", " We are behind you".

As far as time goes it has been all consuming even though you may not have heard of my campaign: The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. I have put so much work into it building my web site, making commercials. I mean it takes a week to outline,shoot, an edit a commercial and I have 141 on my YouTube Station CODE4PRES, most of them dealing with the usurpation of Obama.

Thank you so much for taking the time out of your day to read this, I appreciate it.

Sincerely

Cody Robert Judy

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

YouTube: CODE4PRES


Latest Video- Here's My Subpoena for Obama Where's Yours Congress?





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07hH-ZbdnxM&feature=related

Georgia Decision Denying Obama's Motion Rears Racism's Ugly Head

Comments and Considerations

The Racist Card has come out to show its ugly head as you read through the comments here at the Ledger-Enguirer which posted this article.

Georgia judge to hear arguments on eligibility of Barack Obama on ballot; Orly Taitz hails decision

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2012/01/04/1880356/georgia-judge-to-hear-arguments.html

One of the worst comments of 'racism' I found here and decided to address it.

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/breaking-news-order-on-obamas-motion-to-dismiss-denied/comment-page-1/#comments

Questionman- states:

You racists are pathetic!
At least Obama managed to keep one promise, Bring America together. He brought together every racist, bigot, extremist, homophobic, closet racist #$%$ that resides on the right! It not only shows how bereft of ideas the GOP’s members truly are, their racist rhetoric shows the despicable nature of their character. The GOP are the sworn enemy of the American people and protector of the privileged 1%. These bafoons need to be VOTED OUT because they are so H8ll bent on destroying obama that they are destroying this country because president obama can’t govern. Itis utterly ridiculous that they continue to play these games with filibustering everything and everybody. It’s Offical, Anyone who hates Obama are racists! Obviously Anyone who calls for Obama’s impeachment is a racist, because they can’t stand having a black president And despite what the ignorant “birthers” want us to believe, Obama hasn’t broken any laws that would be considered impeachable, except being black!

Cody Robert Judy responds:@Questionman

Boy it is really sad when the “racist” card is pulled, especially when it is so clearly discounted in the Georgia Action as well as New Hampshire. I am a Plaintiff on the case and a Democrat, who by the way sued Sen. John McCain in 2008 and Barack Obama on our Constitution’s requirement for President.

The biggest foul of ‘racism’ is being played by not informing the public exactly who is sueing Obama with the details so that the public knows I didn’t just pick on the ‘black guy’, but also sued McCain for not being a ‘natural born citizen’ because he was not born in the U.S., but in Panama, this in my opinion failed one of the two-prong test. Obviously the U.S. Senate disagreed with me in giving Sen. McCain non-binding unconstitutional senate resolution 511, but by God when McCain considers with fondness the place of his birth it isn’t the good ole USA. The natural loyalty of his birth doesn’t belong here but its in Panama, as Van Halen would sing it. Besides who needs Congress to tell ya your NBC lol

Obama fails the second of the two pronger without two Citizen parents. Its a Constitutional issue, and calling this ‘racist’ is a sign of desperation, not to mention authorization of fraud and forgery in the Highest Office and being all good with that. That’s really un-American, illegal, and well… a great example of what Obama is outlining as his character truthfully.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 Eligibility Campaign
http://www.codyjudy.us

The Racist Standard of Law over the Constitutional Standard of Law

The Racist Standard of Law over the Constitutional Standard of Law

- New Hampshire Law Commission upholds former sending U.S. spiraling backwards in time-


Upon watching the entire hearing I was moved to tears at the points made by every witness, and thought Orly conducted her presentation very well. After hearing that all the Election Law Committee were Democrats, I wish she had "rubbed" in the fact, just a little, that she had a Democrat Presidential Candidate who wasn't blind to the Constitutional Requirements of President, and that there decision reflects a loss of revenue towards the Primary Ballot with my boycott of the Primary as long as the Constitution has been removed from their favor in a bias of racism!

If their duty towards the Constitution in upholding the natural born citizen qualifications for President as the standard for being eligible for the New Hampshire Primary Ballot has been defeated, we are sadly left with the ugly truth of their duty towards racism being upheld as the basis of their decision. Racism is the belief that inherent different traits in human racial groups justify discrimination.

Their discrimination towards me in favor of Barack Obama's eligibility has no Constitutional backing. They therefore show in their actions the telling signs of racism against me. Discrimination is the unequal treatment of individuals. The unequal standard of allowing Barack Obama on the primary ballot with proof he is not a natural born citizen by the measure of his own release of long form birth certificate showing his father as a Kenya, East African Citizen is therefore racial prejudice, against the standard I am held to.

Prejudice is an attitude, however when it results in an action such as the Election Law Commission's taken against me, it becomes discrimination and allowing Obama on the Ballot with indifference to me is based if you will on "reverse racism" rather than the Constitution.

This is a very sad day in the fight for equality under the standards of our Constitution. This is clearly motivated as a cruelty towards equality in the United States of America, hostile towards and causing harm upon our Constitution by the very people entrusted to defend the Standard.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhDKQtaR38s&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&feature=plcp

Cody Robert Judy - D
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES


Hearing Link:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/20/orly-taitz-nh-ballot-law-commission-and-fraudulent-obama-filing/

“A MALIGNANT CANCER FOSTERED BY OUR CONGRESS

Re: Article in the Post & Email

Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM
Dear Ann, BobSR, Chris, Steve T and Sharon:

You are the reason we have hope, my heart becomes determined and my faith increases because of the “heart” you all demonstrate. Steve T has excellent suggestions for Mr. Dummett, as far as collateral or indirect attacks. For example I have entered complaints with both the House and Senate Judicial Committees challenging
Guyana-born New York attorney Abdul Hassan who is seeking FEC approval as a candidate for President.

http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/09/letter-to-schedule-meeting-with-r-lamar.html
My complaint revolves around the fact that if someone is not qualified how the MUDHOLE can the FEC allow them to raise funds from citizens on the basis of being a qualified candidate when they are in no way able to constitutionally qualify. Its like the FEC is encouraging fraud and a usurpation of the United States Constitution. Mind you this is a malignant organ of our Federal Government that has the ability to remove Obama from the ballot if we can get other FEC Candidates to complain and register their support for this endeavor it could help.

I wish Mr. Demmett all the luck as a candidate and hope he will take note from my actions in 2008 against McCain and Obama and realize depending upon a single Federal Court Judge to compromise Obama is politically speaking at least a 3-5 year process to the United States Supreme Court, which also takes a lot of time and money. I hope he can get in the GOP debates and work his way into the field. He does have to win the GOP nomination before he will get close to Obama.

While more Republican Citizens are behind the birther movement, they seem more willing to sleep with their candidates who are content to keep the issue under the carpet…however; I’m working on a secret project that may be a BIG SURPRISE to a lot of people that may or may not involve one major Republican Presidential Candidate that may with a concerted constitutional effort be seen as reaching across the isle with a match setting ablaze O’s White House for good.

This is the reason I ran as a Democrat, because I knew there would be no infiltration of the top R Candidates and the Media on the Eligibility Claim, Obama is not a natural born citizen! I have 50 possible shots at the State Caucuses and Primaries if people will get involved in their state. That’s much better odds than 1 General Election where Obama has raised just this quarter some 45 million that will dwarf even Mitt Romney’s and Rick Perry’s combined 30 million or so.

I believe firmly that any effort that does not have the eligibility clause firmly planted will not have the success the Republicans have placed their bets on because its a house of cards over our Country.

Of course the Post & Email will get the scoop first because I just love the Patriots involved with her. Yes, affectionately I called the P&E a ‘her’ because she reminds me of the Statue of Liberty, a place to blow the trumpet and hold the flame of liberty high.

God Bless You all- To all other we Birther Candidates are doing our best, but we do need your support and help financially. I’m determined to carry on and keep the campaign open, and your help will simply be put to commercials that will impact others to join our cause.

Its our Country, and our Constitution… its our Heart and Soul of America.

Cody Robert Judy
http://www.codyjudy.us
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Post Note:
The following article serves to demonstrates the need for immediate Congressional Investigations in the 2008 elections and the integrity of the FEC as a watchdog serving the general electorate.

http://articles.southbendtribune.com/2011-10-12/news/30269274_1_petitions-indiana-primary-ballot-voter-registration

This article also demonstrates the need we can all do as part of a patriot march through out this country to get petititons to place me on the ballot for a primary with Obama and the need for signatures to be legit, with phones, addresses, and signitures.

Everyone who is motivated in their state can begin this process at locations appropriately traveled by voters for our Country and Constitution.

Post Note 2
I'm sure that given the choice of facing removing Obama for scandals like 'fast & furious gunwalker' verses removing him for being ineligiable by our Constitution's standards, Congress would prefer the former.

Big Media Outlets Ignore Corruption

Any Attorney General who refuses to uphold the Constitution on our Commander-In-Chiefs qualification demands is certainly deserving of fast and furious justice sweeping down on him. A.G. Eric Holder, your a disgrace for protecting your corrupt boss. Get an honest job!