TERM OF ART - Driving People Mad
FEATURED EDITORIAL
How would the world feel if 19 Academic Professors and U.S. Court Judges were caught spray
Reference: The Post & Email Gorsuch
Alexandra Turney shared her experience at seeing David with an article in the Huffington Post as such:
[ Once inside the Accademia, my apathy was transformed into wonder. When I stood in front of David I was instantly struck by his sheer size. He’s enormous - a larger than life superhero figure, somehow all the more beautiful for being out of proportion. Just like Botticelli’s Venus, with her disproportionate body and impossible pose, David represents an idealised yet unrealistic human body. He’s been sculpted with such skill that he seems physically perfect and lifelike, yet we’re also aware that he’s a 17 foot fantasy figure who could never exist in real life. Like all great works of art, David makes us marvel at the artist’s skill, even as we become even more acutely aware of the gap between art and reality.
I spent a while slowly circling the statue, looking at it from every angle. I admired the incredible attention to detail - the curve of his muscles, the outlines of his veins - and thought about how incredible it was, that Michelangelo had created something so perfect out of a block of marble once considered to be too flawed to be used. I thought about Michelangelo, still only in his twenties, working on the sculpture in secrecy for two years before it was unveiled to the public in Piazza della Signoria. If we’re amazed by David now, having seen his image countless times before we visit the Accademia, how much more amazing must David have been for the people of Florence in 1504?
I spent a while slowly circling the statue, looking at it from every angle. I admired the incredible attention to detail - the curve of his muscles, the outlines of his veins - and thought about how incredible it was, that Michelangelo had created something so perfect out of a block of marble once considered to be too flawed to be used. I thought about Michelangelo, still only in his twenties, working on the sculpture in secrecy for two years before it was unveiled to the public in Piazza della Signoria. If we’re amazed by David now, having seen his image countless times before we visit the Accademia, how much more amazing must David have been for the people of Florence in 1504?
Against all my expectations, seeing Michelangelo’s David in person was a profound experience.]
As we consider the reverence and beauty of art and how it affects us one might appreciate the delicate art of words and how profound the requirement found within the U.S. Constitution's Article II., Section 1, Clause 5 originally demanded for only the Office of President, but later thought upon for good measure and becoming a requirement for the Office of Vice President Office.
Reference:
'natural born Citizen' a term of art
noun
- a word or phrase that has a precise, specialized meaning within a particular field or profession."‘public domain’ is a term of art in copyright law and you shouldn't throw it around if you don't know what it means"
a word or phrase that has a specific or precise meaning within a given discipline or field and might have a different meaning in common usage: Set is a term of art used by mathematicians, and burden of proof is a term of art used by lawyers. Words nearby term of art.
CRJ Tweet
Acedemic #Professors & #Judges caught spray painting #graffiti on #workofart [natural born Citizen] born in country to citizens #SCOTUShttps://t.co/M4GE3CJhvH— Cody Robert Judy (@CodyRobertJudy) January 2, 2020
Check📌 https://t.co/BZzGt3XMsI Check📌 https://t.co/tS2knhYAcH#utpol #birther @nytimes @sltrib @latimes @CityWeekly
"Natural Born Citizen" was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also."
Obama's problem, by his own admission and records of the State Department is this:
Obama's father was not a United States citizen.
Therefore, via Minor v, Happersett and the United States Supreme Court in 1875, Obama is ineligible because, since his father was not a U.S. citizen, Obama is not a natural born citizen.
For a person to run, as his or her party's nominee for President, the party must issue certification that the person named is eligible under the United States Constitution to become President.
Because the Constitution does not specify the definition of "Natural born citizen" it was left to the United States Supreme Court which, in 1875, defined it as a person born in a country of parents who were its citizens and, Obama's father was NOT a U.S. citizen.
Now couple that with the reports of a Law Enforcement Investigation which found I.D. Fraud involved, and the fact it was reported lawfully to the Judicial Branch by one with standing entered into the Presidential race of 2008, 2012, and 2016, that also included John McCain as not a natural born Citizen, and you see clearly, the desecration of art and graffiti spraying party the President, Justices, Representatives, Senators and Professors have all been involved in.
Why those who appreciate art are not outraged is beyond the civilized conscience and while you may be in a huff about the definition, you'll note 10 works of art that made people really mad as a confirming witness.
If you liked this Article you may also like
