Let's Give Up the Constitution for a Piece of Trash? Hummm?

The following transcript from the video, and the video seen below is the most benign friendly piece of trash. What makes it so vagarious is its framer Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Louis Michael Seidman seems so dangerous who would pay him any attention?

Mild mannered, even tempered and a constitutional law professor - wasn't Obama also a "senior lecturer," at the University of Chicago Law School who said he "served as a professor" and said he was "regarded as" a professor?

I'd like to take this time to make some scratch marks over his "simple idea" which I've encased in [] and start with the first sentence which jumps right out of the gate on you like the orders from the leader of a flash mob set to trash a retail store in the mall:

[I've got a simple idea: Let's give up on the Constitution.]

Simple ideas are genuinely pure and straight forward, but even if he used the 6 words to shock you, the resulting vacuum of the Republic for which we stand has vanished for what we must assume is not a Republic, in which the majority mob rules and the individual loses. What would the ACLU say to that?

[I know, it sounds radical, but it's really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie.]

Well, he has admitted to being radical here but knows its necessary to try and convince you otherwise. Our prisons are full of people who decided to break the law and here he is advocating "Constitutional disobedience" which is basically a disobedience of the Supreme Law of the Land the likes of which every office holder of the court and government have sworn to uphold.

[For example, most of our greatest Presidents -- Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts -- had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.]

Perfect examples Presidents? - irregardless of any circumstances that our Constitution actually allows and provides for within the Constitution, which would make it not against the Constitution. He uses past presidents, who in his words in the bottom paragraph we would consider "ancient and outdated" as his examples of giving up on the Constitution? How is it possible to use "ancient and outdated" material to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? Shouldn't he be using modern material if he wants to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? He makes no sense.

[To be clear, I don't think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.]

Ohhhh so he thinks some things are good in the Constitution now and wants to save the "parts" of it that are "important and inspiring provisions", according to who? Him? I find the "natural born citizen clause for the Office of the President quite inspiring that has for over 200 years prevented a foreign leader from financing his own heirs on to the throne of the White House.

[Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn't a natural-born citizen. So what?]

Holy Cow!- This guy is nuts. So the Electorate actually does their job and finds out because of a little investigation that the President Elect is only 11 years old and is the son of North Korea Kim Jong II- a son he had born in Hawaii. Anyone see a problem with that? He obviously doesn't. Or was he talking about the off chance insanity plot of the the Pres and VP actually being assassinated and our Constitution providing a back up in the chain of command who would have the authority vested in them, but who were not elected specifically for that office while we got together and voted again? He doesn't like that part.

[Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control.]

Pernicious? Such a coy word - Having a harmful effect, esp. in a gradual or subtle way. What? He just said we should abandon the Constitution and he doesn't think he is being pernicious? Then he has the audacity to chum up to the Constitution's 2nd Amendment? This guys dumb and he's got balls. That's a dangerous combination. The fact his friends don't believe he's a friend to the Constitution makes me wonder if his friends are right. His opening statement did in fact say "Give Up the Constitution" rather then "Give Up parts of the Constitution" in some sensible and reasonable term as the Constitution permits, being flexible and adaptable to modern times by 2/3rds of a majority. Does he have a problem with finding 2/3rd of the Representatives and Senators that we the people, the majority, pick actually agreeing on an Amendment? What - its not fast enough for him or is it the fact that 2/3rd is just too heavy of a burden?

[I understand, though, that's not everyone's view, and I'm eager to talk with people who disagree.]

Yes, he's eager to talk to people who disagree with the 2nd Amendment because they are more his friends then the ones he was referring to can't believe he's a 2nd Amendment champion?

[But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago.]

Now he's comparing taking a stand for the Constitution to constipation in the word "Constitutional-ized" is that even a word in the wiki dictionary? Yes it is and it means: Incorporated into a constitution. How does that happen? Oh yes, 2/3rd of the Congress agree to it. Then he reveals his true colors on gun control advocating the notion that people two centuries ago could not have possibly wanted a gun for the same reason our military does, our own militia's do, and our own hunters do? How could the line of thinking still exist of overthrowing a tyrannical government? Is tyrannical dictator king still a word he understands?

[Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one's commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.]

More on Gun Control out of his 2nd Amendment respecting mouth here; funny I've never heard of anyone at the NRA's rally's getting riled about people giving them weapons. Its always the people wanting to take their water and bee-bee guns away that pisses them off.

[This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today.]

A little patriotism out of his mouth respecting America's Constitution and its flexibility for our modern age? No, he's mocking it. He also advocates that the French and United Nations should not rule over us and then throws the founder and framers overboard with them. He just doesn't understand our Constitution is flexible and provides a great way for Amendments does he? He also doesn't seem to understand that people who lived two centuries ago thought making-love was a lot better then making war. That's pretty standard I think. The proof? We're here because our Daddys got our Mama's pregnant and managed enough food to feed us. WhaWhoo!

[If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.]

Take back our country? From who? It sounds like this guy is advocating for England to take back the States. In which case he is aiding and abetting for something even more ancient and outdated then the Constitution. If this professor from Georgetown University, a school that was on my list to attend when I was 18, is anything like the others I'd say America has no friend there, but old King George might have, and I made the right decision not to attend. Reminds me of a few words of my new song The Promise Man - "your the new American slave, that's what this is all about."

Now if you wanna hear this pompous elitist B.S. in action just hit the play button.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57566014/professor-take-our-country-back-from-the-constitution/




Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: Cody Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4



Words to The Promise Man

Presenting: The Promise Man - by The Cody Robert Judy Band celebrating SCOTUS Case # 12-5276 Judy v. Obama and demonstrating the reasons for protecting the Constitution that provide the opportunity in America. This includes the natural born citizen clause unique to the Office of the President Obama fails not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.
(Words)
The Promise Man
Prelude:
I'm talkn' to all you dreamers -- think America is your opportunity..yea -- you can't hide from me -- I see you out there- loving the opportunity- That America brings -- Yea you got your own style- and that's what I want to talk to you about.

Vs.1 -- You see that ole ball is slowing down but your dreams are speeding up- That economic ladders growing faster and let's face it you aint keeping up- Obama's got a spending habit, he's a generational spending jack rabbit- Now its you he's selling out- and for this there aint no doubt- You're the new American slave-That's what this is all about -- That's what this is all about.

Vs.2 -- You know I don't mince no words --No I aint got time for all of that- But I give this time to you- Hell, you know it's the least that I could do.- Because you are my American brother from another mother- Before it gets to cold- You know that fortune favors the bold.-And that snake is coming around telln' you it aint maken' a sound- And its grip is getn' tighter-Its gonna squeeze till there aint no fighter -- And then what you gonna do -- All those dreams aint coming true -- All those dreams aint coming true.

Vs.3 - You need to walk out on this man -- Whose putting a curse on this here promise land-While your purse is getn' lighter --You say Code your just a Constitutional fighter- I'm telling you 16 trillion ain't no joke -- Turning all that hope into --Now you gotta cope- While this country's going up in smoke -- You know you're all goin broke. --The ball aint slamming down quite as fast- Hell your good times-They aint gonna last-Cuz your freedom suffered a concussion -- Remember this is America -- This aint Russia.

Vs.4- I'm not tryn to be no rock'n rapper- Hell, I'm a politician- I got dreams just like you- I'm calling to your recognition- You know I don't use dope -- Hell, I don't even smoke- But ole Uncle Sam's going broke- This aint what you call superstition. -- Why I'm tryn' to tell you about Obama-Gate -- I'm not tryn' to excommunicate -- But you don't wanna hear -- The loss of freedom and liberties your biggest fear -- I'm just like you -- Writing at my kitchen table- Tell'n you about Obama's fable -- Telln' you about Obama's fable.

Chorus: (insert between verses total 4)

I'm putting on my coat -- I'm walking out on this man (repeat 4 times) I'm putting on my coat-walkn out on this man- make me the promise land --make me the promise land. I'm putting on my coat --I'm walk'n out on this man -- I'm putting on my coat- I'll be your promise man -- Yeah, I'll be your promise man.

No Leg to Stand on- The Justices denied Judy v. Obama 12-5276

My ,- Our- ;), "Petition for Rehearing" with the U.S. Supreme Court was "Denied". ; /

Makes me feel bad because they wouldn't even hear it and in doing so they have basically, officially squashed the "natural born citizen" qualification for President in the Constitution without a word or hearing.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F12-5276.htm

I just feel terrible they wouldn't even let us have an oral argument on it,just locked us out.

You know I can hardly believe it. I wish I had one of the Justices cell phones because it just doesn't make any sense. Without being able to speak with them we are left to take the "Clerk of the court's word" for it.

Because of the process I've been through I know its entirely possible they didn't see the case and some Clerks black-bagged it, but there's no way to talk to them. If not that, then you wonder if they are so threatened that they feel the compromise is in the broader interest of the agreement;say someone's got a nuclear pointed at NY, and they simple are black mailed, which is entirely possible.

Faced with that situation what we any of us do? Say good bye to 8 million Americans in NY? God.. that would be hard.

Frankly, I think we are in a hell of a situation here and the "agenda" of what's going down is just going to blow us away when its fully understood. I mean when the FBI, CIA, SCOTUS, Military and Congress say its okay to forge birth certificates and lie your way to the top what do you say? "We tried", that's pretty pathetic but that's about where we're at.

If I hadn't been through what I've been through with the SCOTUS Clerks I might have more faith that the Justices had indeed reviewed my case. Its the actions of the Clerks of the SCOTUS themselves, that I can not deny, that make me suspicious that the Justices haven't seen their way to this case.

These actions I am left to contemplate myself and if I had not been the recipient I would have nothing to say, nor would I probably believe it if someone was telling me as I am you.

But ... I don't think there is anything to do about it either. I'm scratching my head. The good thing I do know, is that if its a pit they're digging for our Constitution, I'm sure they will find themselves in the pit they had dug sooner or later. I hope that's not the case but God won't see our Constitution die though it may hang by a thread, the thread won't break, in this I have faith.

One thing I do share is the frustration of many Americans who 'trust' their leaders and those they have elected to do the right thing and defend the Constitution. We have proven that Congress was shammed with the CRS Memorandums about Obama's birth certificate and that thousands of letters have gone out to the public with the advice of the sham perpetrated by Jack Maskell. Here's a review if you missed that.





We know that Congress was manipulated. We know that Obama passed out documents certifying his birth that were manipulated. We know his lawyers know that his long form birth certificate and short form and selective service card were manipulated making them non usable for official purposes.

We know that Obama's purported father disqualifies him from being President. We know they all know this, and that they know we know, they know we know they know, however those elected leaders in Congress that can do something and should do something about it won't.

Is it embarrassment because they have all been snookered? Is it a deep seated hatred they have for the Constitution itself? Is it power unchecked that once they get to Washington DC numbs their brain and head?

Perhaps its the snake that they feel isn't coiled quite tight enough for them to throw down the gauntlet on Obama's eligibility so we can at least have a president who fills the natural born citizen requirement of our Constitution in the White House as a commander-in chief who isn't a walking talking violation of the Constitution?

Do Republicans still feel cozy about watching Obama make a mockery of the Constitution and a mockery of them in economical protocol and the economy with a 16 Trillion dollar debt that is going up 100,000 every 6 seconds, to a Government who offers no palatable smidgen of sweet to reducing their spending?

Ever wonder how both the Iraq war and Afghanistan War could be over and our Government figure out a way to spend even more money now?

So often with the victors of war go the spoils, and Obama is spoiling our Nation and I don't think this is a place even anti-birthers, including the media, who somehow retain a verifiable certifiable belief that nothing is amiss when it comes to Obama's eligibility in the face of professional law enforcement investigations on the matter, and with what a little homework could uncover.

We're left thinking they don't like home-work, or they just don't think it matters all that much. That is definitely one way to think. Perhaps understandably they think, "No single individual can stand up against all of this because so many people are involved now."

Credibility, integrity, honest, virtue, even the moral fiber of our society is at risk because those in charge put it all on Harvey Dent... ole two face himself: Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama, whichever one he is when he turns profile. You've seen Obama cast as the Joker, but Harvey Dent who turned into Harvey Two Face makes more sense.

No one raised the roof about Obama being a U.S. Senator and there he was living the dream of a Kenyan Born lad who had literally overcome so many odds.

Somewhere in between the time Obama was a U.S. Senator and the decision to run for President he crossed a line and now we have Obama two-face and what seems all of our Government, on both sides of the isle, defending the very acts of fraud and forgery most would go to prison for perpetrating at the powerful and important level of the Office of the President.

Well, like Nixon said he believed, " When the President does it it's not illegal", only difference between the mentality of the media now verses the mentality of the media then was Nixon was a Republican, and the media now shares Obama's feelings rather then apposes that view.

Ronald Reagan appointed three United States Supreme Court Justices and many people don't recall that was superseded by Nixon appointing no less than four United States Supreme Court Justices, when wondering about justice being blind then as compared to now.

There is one slimmer of a positive to note here in the contemplation of the actions here by the United States Supreme Court Justices and that is the broader view that the United States People are gaining of them and of the integrity of the United States Supreme Court.

Of course as you may have been introduced to in a blog of mine before, justice is not always right, even at the highest levels. Many many people have not been exposed to such thought. Its almost new to them even though people as myself have suffered the injustices for years.

I am happy to have many many more people join me in the ideology that justice is really fucked up in this country by most every official anyone knows. When you can count on one hand the law officials willing to knuckle down on Obama's ineligibility and the fraud and forgery present in this nefarious cover-up, and realize the paltry handful of people with integrity who are elected officials, you gain an understanding of being victimized by the un-lawful actions of officials representing the law, and how that feels.

Yes, I'd say Obama has done more for America then any person in the White House, when it comes to America gaining a empathy and understanding for those oppressed in prisons, set up, accused falsely, and having their Constitutional Rights abolished and stripped away.

Where are my 2nd Amendment rights to defend myself after I did the time society asked? Obama's taken my guns away and now he's after yours.He'll get them to, you watch.

These poor fatherless bastard Congressmen will tote up to him to; you can't trust them as far as their oaths. If their oaths meant a red-cent nickle to them they'd be opening up Congressional Investigations and Sheriff Arpaio and people like myself would be called in to testify on the matter of Obama's fraud & Forgery docs and his ineligibility.

Look what (Congress)they've done to your "natural born citizen" demand in the Constitution America. Threw that out like a piece of toilet paper they'd just blown their nose on or wiped their arse on.

I feel sorry for most American's now who "think" they have a 2nd Amendment Right or any rights, because Obama's closed the hamper on his dirty clothes or eligibility, and Congress isn't about to do Obama's dirty laundry.

You know I used to be an avid hunter too. Really enjoyed the sport. The Governments basically told me I can't have any self defense to myself. If someone wants to pull up and shoot away they can shoot anyone whose ever had a felony pretty well get away with it. Of course that's what the Government does and sadly we've seen it witnessed time and time again.

Government decides they see someone whose peaceable assembled at home and pretty soon here they come with their S.W.A.T teams and warrant-less search and seizures capacity armed with nuclear weapons if necessary and blows you to away to kingdom come. The hunters in every state might as well start sucking the wind-pipes of their deer rifles now.

I'm sorry to say this, but there is nothing right now between you and a clean Bill of Rights and you're own law enforcement people in you're own home town in you're own home state are witnesses that what I'm saying is the truth because they are in on the cover-up of Obama's fraud and forgery and his ineligibility! They are in on it, and helping Obama as his mice!

You think this through. If every Sheriff was calling every Governor and telling them they had thousands of people at his door clamoring about Obama's fraud and forgery expecting him to complain and the Governors had every sheriff in every county hankering, Obama and his mincing Congress wouldn't be more than another week in office.

That's the God honest Truth of the matter. Now you know the reason that the Republican Party is through. Its over. They are no longer the party of conservatism and if your American and conservative you need to understand this. The Republicans in office right now are not worth the manure out behind the barn as fertilizer.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593




Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing





Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included