BREAKING NEWS: Candidate for President Invites All Scholar Reviews for Natural Born Citizen to Amicus Curiae Review in U.S. Supreme Court

BREAKING NEWS: Candidate for President Invites All Scholar Reviews for Natural Born Citizen to Amicus Curiae Review in U.S. Supreme Court
FEATURED EDITORIAL - The Post & Email
Put up or Shut up is the clear message from Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy

The Amicus Curiae or Friend of the Court

In the most critical and controversial court, which is that of the court of public opinion, the vital artery of national defense understood as the 'natural born Citizen' qualification requirement for the Office of President and Vice President is being cut into by both Republicans and Democrats. In 2007 "Birthers" were a yet unknown group upon the American Pyche but the incubation was about to burst as in 2008 with Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama.

The Supreme Court of the United States has never had a case involving two Presidential Candidates squared off with one citing the other is ineligible based on one not being a 'natural born Citizen' and causing harm to the others Campaign in American History, but that is exactly what has happen and is happening in the newly docketed Case in the Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

Many would say the issue is over with Obama in the White House, but scholarly reviews differ in points of view. A consensus is building at least with the political ground shifting with Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Marco Rubio and even former Governor of California weighing in on the circumstances of the civil battle which offsets the turf Obama has already infringed upon. If it stopped Arnold Schwarzenegger who emphazised so much appreciation to the opportunity America has given, shouldn't it stop Sen. Ted Cruz? Indeed, a few of America's Presidents were not born here, or didn't have parents who were Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the exemption was tied into the Constitution as part of the requirement recognizing the jurisdictional importance of the ratification of the Constitution as Supreme Law.

Three such reviews all being used as weapons at the bully pulpit have come in the reviews published by scholastic establishments but are notably missing actual legal case numbers we associate with the interpretation of law and the United States Constitution.

1-The Harvard Law Review published a Commentary by two former Solicitor Generals in Neal Katyal and Paul Clement published as "On the Meaning of "Natural Born Citizen" March 11,2015.

2-Professor Sarah Duggin
stated: “No, I don't think it's an open-and-shut case. I think the better argument is that Senator Cruz is eligible to run for president and to serve as president of the United States. But absent a Supreme Court ruling or a constitutional amendment, it is not open-and-shut.”

'The potential controversy attached to Cruz’s legal standing to run for president has precedent in recent times. The late Sen. Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona while it was still a territory and not technically part of the United States. More recently, some people argued that his birth in the Panama Canal Zone should have disqualified Sen. John McCain from running.'

She wrote " Is Ted Cruz a natural born citizen eligible to serve as president?" acknowledging the very difficult standards for the Supreme Court to even be able to weigh in on the subject because of the laws conducting 'standing' really requiring another Presidential Candidate to bring it to the Court, and then hurdling the 'political doctrine question' which disfavors the Court interfering with elections for one party or the other.

3- Regent University Law Professor C. Scott Pryor highlighted the paper in a recent blog post also taking a swipe at the recent Harvard Law Review citing a John Jones published a scholarly paper, "Natural Born Shenanigans: How the Birther Movement Exacerbated Confusion Over the Constitution's Natural Born Citizen" published in the Regent University Law Review on the Article II "natural born Citizen" requirement controversy stating "Whatever its merits, the birther movement’s persistent advocacy against Obama’s eligibility in the face of hard facts may have actually helped to downplay and discredit a distinct, more legally credible challenge to the candidate’s status as a natural born citizen."
Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/04/regent-university-law-review-obama.html#e7Ap6rxKFlfCvksr.99

_________________________
EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT! the EXCLUSIVE AND FEATURE REPORT AND INTERVIEW by THE POST & EMAIL HERE
__________________________


While scholarly reports and commentaries are valuable they indeed to not have the impact of being law and when the laws are especially uncomfortable to politicians every effort may be used to bully the law or jar it out of place for the convenience of politicians in this case wanting to take advantage and pursue ulterior political ambition.

HOW DOES THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT EFFECT EVERYONE

A recent natural born Citizen documentary video was featured winning a prestigious Telly Award. This video is very informative and highlights in seven minutes the origins and real founding of the natural born Citizen clause as a requirement for the Office of the President.


In Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821)the Chief Justice of the United States Honorable John Marshall stated: "It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should"

"The Judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution."

"We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it,if it be brought before us."

"We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution."


In the controversial issue of wither a State must recognize another States marriage of same-sex couples, and wither States should be compelled to offer a Same Sex (SS) Marriage licence as it does a Opposite Sex (OS) Marriage Licence the Supreme Court has agreed to here a dissenting Circuit Court Case Appeal that could really bring the remaining 13 States outlawing SS Marriage into harmony with the 37 that have adopted it as a featured 'Citizens' right. This is a case of individuals and their rights in love to marry and receive the benefits and be held accountable to the same tax laws and credits given to OS Marriage couples. That case is under James Obergefell, et al v. Richard Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health. Docket 14-556 and featured three briefs before it was sent to Conference in the Supreme Court.

After it was decided the Case would be heard by the Supreme Court, meaning at least 4 of the Justices voted to hear it, when it went to conference, and at current near 140 Amicus Curiae Briefs have been filed by individuals and organizations all over the United States both 'for' and 'against' the issue for the Court to reference.

Now think of this. The defense in modern terms has always been a primary concern that the Republicans and its various groups and PACS that have supported and apposed cut backs. You could say the Republicans are better at appropriating money for defense programs. So what does it say about Republicans who love "Defense" of the Country when it comes to fighting and protecting America's interest abroad, to not care who is in the Office of the President or what Qualifications have been violated? Isn't that a "WELCOME SIGN" to anyone who can tunnel under the U.S. Constitution into the White House and then be protected by the very defense that we were suppose to be protected by with all that Defense appropriations money?

What's the message Republicans have propagated from their pulpit? Its not really the Defense of Americans and our Future Generations that were concerned about its really not our concern. We just want to grease the defense building war machines and target practice on foreign soil? They don't give a muscrats whisker about the 'natural born Citizen' national defense security measure as a qualification that no foreign loyalty be divested in the Commander-In-Chief with his finger on the red nuke codes and his executive pen able to legalize a foreign army invading America? Gosh, they strong on national defense for foreign fights but weak on domestic tranquility?

In other words, if we have domestic enemies get in we have no defense? Well, Democrats don't have a much better record accept for the one Democratic Candidate running for President who has upheld in Court Records the national defense of the 'natural born Citizen' clause across Party Lines in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama that is now finally in the United States Supreme Court.


THE PURPOSE OF AMICUS CURIAE


LETTER OF CONSENT BY PETITIONER for all Amicus Curiae Briefs for or against to weigh in on Natural Born Citizen qualifications for President

Letter of Consent Amicus Curiae via Petitioner

The invitation is and has been given for anyone who is concerned and who is able to find an attorney who is legally qualified to practice in the United States Supreme Court to file their concern or assist in this great national security defense of our Country. Are their any groups or PACs interested I suppose we will see but at least it is brought to the Court as a matter of RECORD. The Response is due May 20th, and it usually goes to conference soon thereafter, so there is not a lot of time for those interested to file one.

This case like the SS Marriage Case, is a fight for Individual Rights and certainly effects every American who isn't concerned with who they are have or don't have a right to marry. This case effects Health Care, Amnesty, and the very vital vein individual rights we all want protected so in this sense effects many more Americans then the single issue of SS Marriage.

How much good is it going to do you if when you finally win at the Supreme court the right to marry that a Commander-In-Chief walks in and dismisses Congress and the Courts with an indictment upon all Gay People to report to the internment camp? That right there is the respect or the lack of respect for upholding the Constitution and in it the vital artery of the 'natural born Citizen' clause required for the Office of the President and the Vice President.

Let me point out that the support for Principle over Party is so ambiguous and disingenuous that it may seem partisan with Republicans and Democrats in the same field as wanting to adopt the same communism that runs over 'individual rights' and rounds up and imprisons those who would twurk in front of a national monument which is what happened in Russia who has not adopted the United States Constitution as an import. If you do not appreciate freedom of speech, freedom of the press and any other right as an individual here in America, by all means the fastest way to violate each and every one is through the current Office of the President's invitation to abolish the 'natural born Citizen' clause all together.

Forgive me if I do not share your sentiment that it is not important and may God forgive you for treading upon your own freedom and liberty on one hand, and saying you wanted it on the other. One of the things I know God didn't like was a hypocrite and sometimes it is very hard not to be seen like that, which is why "Change" is invited through Repentance with the Good Lord in my humble opinion.

In short, this INVITATION,I hope you will share with your favorite law professor,and certainly gives all of the Scholastic and Scholarly Opinion Writers a 'chance' to actually get it on the RECORD of the United States Supreme Court. If they do not accept the invitation then of course you know they're 'opinion's' are nothing more than that and they are not willing to come to the Court with them with any degree of integrity.

Cody Robert Judy
Now Read: Obama's Bubble About to Burst!

Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.




Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!

Sen Ted Cruz Center Stage in Ineligibility Monday As Nation Considers Veiled Threat to U.S. Supreme Crt.

Cruz Controlled
Sen Ted Cruz Center Stage in Ineligibility Monday As Nation Considers Veiled Threat to U.S. Supreme Crt.



With a big planned announcement set for Monday, March 23rd,2015 at Liberty University Sen. Cruz may have tipped his hand to announcing an official entry into the Presidential Race of 2016. 'The announcement set off speculation that Cruz is just days away from officially throwing his hat in the ring for the 2016 presidential race. While no one in Cruz's camp would confirm the content of his upcoming speech, a political staffer told The Daily Beast, "You're going to want to be there."

If that indeed proves to be the case we certainly hope that Sen. Cruz is up to defending his ineligibility in the United States District Court as part of his opening ceremony in cutting his teeth in the Presidential Race. Indeed Sen. Cruz may be performing an invaluable service for our Country because he's not partially black and most likely will not be defended by the Main Stream Media as a Minority in fending off a Presidential Eligibility Article II Patriot stand as 'racist', unless he decides it 'racist' that his Canadian Native Citizenship by soil and his father's inherited Canadian and Cuban Citizenship are foreign/alien national identities that the United States is bound to honor in the Office of the Presidency for the United States of America.

Indeed if the a ruse has been undertaken by Sen. Cruz in deference to Obama we are obliged to counter his play in defense of the United States Constitution so many have bled for giving life,limb and liberty in their heroic actions in service of our Republic.

In a recent stained carpet exploit Sen. Cruz's defense as eligible was snipped by Attorney Mario Apuzo and reported at The Birther Report. The all is fair in treading upon the U.S. Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen in the Office of the President was undertaken in a report entitled "On the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen" as Commentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement embarrassingly sporting their credentials as former Solicitor Generals in dereliction that any difference at all exist between the foreign national U.S. citizen first generation, and the time honored natural defense on behalf of our national security and tradition of a two generation buffer identified as natural born Citizen required only for the Office of the President and Vice President.

Indeed Neal Katyal & Paul Clement forming a scholastic tradition of their own law, published by none other then the same Harvard Law Review Obama was credited as President of without a single word or published Review available and the dicey accusations that Obama actually was financed by a twenty million dollar donation of foreign fiat, have embarked in a challenge that puts the words of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney featured on one of this Blog's most widely read FEATURES to the test.
As Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote in Holmes v. Jennison (1840) as to the importance of every word of the U.S. Constitution:
"In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force, and appropriate meaning; for it is evident from the whole instrument, that no word was unnecessarily used, or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the constitution, have proved the correctness of this proposition; and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood

Arm Yourself with Intelligence Art. II. Patriots with our new 9 point Quick Defense Cards

Indeed we are left with motive and we also notice herein that Harvard has served equally both Sen. Ted Cruz in his conferred J.D. in Law as well as Obama.

As a unofficial Presidential Candidate who has not yet entered the race for 2016, Cody Robert Judy is watching very carefully what Sen. Cruz decides to do because Sen. Cruz's first hurdle into the Presidential race might be doing more than having a go at Iowa in two years. It could very well be his retirement party from being an embarrassed TX. Senator who chose to 'Tread' on US rather then defend the U.S. Constitution as his oath required.

From the early traditions of America the Gadsden Flag reminiscent of even Founder Benjamin Franklin who delighted us with his renditions and use of the rattlesnake in an insinuated satirical cartoon co-opted by England's tradition of sending known criminals to America he disassembled to represent the 13 Colones. The inference was that those attempting to take the next step crossing the line of illegality on the U.S. Constitution were indeed stepping into a danger zone that could result in a venomous attack by a sharped fanged predator. The use of a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike with a rattle was indeed a warning not to take another step nearer the line that was about the circumference of the snake.

In the tradition of holding the line that a 'natural born Citizen' is exactly a two generation defense of our national security holding those Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents have a longer time honored America loyalty distinguished from first generation Americans I have sent the following letter directly as it relates to preparing what seems to be an afront upon America from both sides of the isle in directive assault upon the natural defense of our U.S. Constitution and willingness of Candidates from both major parties to do so.

Begin LTR.
Dear Mr. Mario Apuzo Esq.
Would you consider filling suit for me as a Presidential Candidate, pro bono , against Sen. Ted Cruz as he is expected to enter the Presidential Race this coming Monday, March 23rd, 2015.

You may know the actions I have filed in 2008 against Sen. McCain that also involved Sen. Obama. Then I filed in 2012 against Obama to N.H. Supreme Crt., Georgia Supreme Crt ., and U.S. SUPREME CRT.

My current and last chance case against Obama I have Just filed a Notice of Appeal from 10th Circuit Crt. 14-4136.

My biggest question regarding appropriate standing is can I claim Sen. Cruz is taking contributions from me by his entry even though he is not the Republican nominee?

My considered answer is he is causing a whole lot of damage and extra work for me contending for the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN clause as I'm battling and spending so much time now fighting with Republicans that it is wasting precious resources away from my campaign for President.

Thank you for your blog and tireless fight for The U.S. Constitution and especially as an Art. II Patriot.I respect and appreciate your efforts.

In 2012 I ran as a Democrat. In 2008 I ran as a Write-In. I have not ruled out running under the D Party Ticket, neither ruled out an Independent Party Ticket for 2016 but have not officially entered yet as either. However, I'm feeling more and more inclined as a Democratic Party Ticket mostly because of Cruz and Rubio and the fact the courts in 2012 ballot challenges didn't really care I was a D against Obama. I think damages are being inflicted upon me across party lines from the moment of entry.

My blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com has many entries already about Sen. Cruz that have also been published as Featured Editorials as proof of damages in time, talent, and money.

My web site www.codyjudy.us

My thought is Sen. Cruz eligibility fought fast and furiously in U.S. District Court could prove beneficial to the last stand in the U.S. Supreme Court against Obama.

Thank you for your consideration.
Cody Robert Judy
Cody@codyjudy.us
End LTR.

The two frontal assault is not at all foreign to me as I sued Sen. McCain in 2008 and continued that with Obama as a Presidential Candidate in 2012, 13, and the latest work in Judy v. Obama 14-4136 appealed as reported with a Notice of Appeal here.

One of the biggest reason I have related to every Court I have appealed to that the U.S. Constitution in the eligibility clause was being attacked by both parties was that non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 included three major candidates for election Sen. John McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and then Sen. Barack Obama. Indeed we might say especially if Hillary Clinton enters the Presidential Race and wins that this resolution included the winner of America's Presidential Elections for the last three Presidential Contest making it very significant as far as non-binding resolutions go.

If the Judicial Branch fails to act as a check and balance to the major parties in the Legislative Branch, and the breach of both the Democrats and Republicans controlling the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch continues rolling over the U.S. Constitution, indeed the Judicial Branch might soon find itself irrelevant also because without a living Constitution their appointments are also moot and that includes the life long paycheck of those who are in the U.S. Supreme Court who perhaps muse at Obama's recent pander that a new U.S. Supreme Court and mandatory voting might be fun as was reported again on this blog piece in The Blaze link:

[President Barack Obama said that in the long term “it would be fun” to go through the process of amending the Constitution to put limits on campaign contributions, but said the short-term solution to curbing the influence of money in politics is if “everybody voted.” “Here’s the problem. Citizens United was a Supreme Court ruling based on the First Amendment. So it can’t be overturned by statute,” Obama said. “It could be overturned by a new court or it could be overturned by a constitutional amendment. Those are extraordinarily challenging processes.”], but as C.I.C he actually could replace the Court with one drone missile and blame it on ISIS who were left an assortment of weapons in Iraq also reported here.

The Courts thus far in the Article II, Section I, Clause 5's demand the President be a natural born Citizen have been willing to throw back the responsibility to Congress avoiding the issue under a doctrine political question argument and at the same time thinking their responsibility is impervious to a political or military action. Obama's muse should be taken to heart as he said some 22 times as was reported by House Speaker Boehner he could not by executive action change the Court's stand on Amnesty, but we know now he has done it.

While the threat to the U.S. Supreme Court was veiled as a long term process by Obama and the eligibility argument has been repeatedly refused by the Court making Obama feel comfortable in the Office of the President, the Court should understand that a different objective from Obama might supply the motive for its more immediate change and that the eligibility argument might have been the only one they in fact refused, which in the end spilled their blood as traitors to the law they were sworn to protect as the Supreme Law of the Land.

Taking this lightly could easily be their undoing by a political party ruled so far to the left that even a Democratic Party centrist like Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Party is spurred and worthy of being sabotaged by no less than six investigations as Rush Limbaugh's transcript reported Obama's operatives were leaking to the press.

You might say you can't take it with you and you'd be right; My job is really just to make it clear as a bell and you'd think Obama was seconding the motion with his speech in Cleveland, Ohio Wednesday. Today former Governor O'Malley was seen in Iowa as a runner up for a Hillary Implosion but given the political climate change I could see a Democratic Party debate between O'Malley and myself with the stark difference that I actually was taking a stand for Civil Rights and doing something about the Republican infringements on the U.S. Constitution by a Constitutional uncaring Sen.Cruz.

Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

Cody Robert Judy

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here