Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Hope & Change 2nd Amendment v. Your NBC Family Defense



Hope & Change v. Your Family Defense

An interesting thought has come up this morning with Glenn Beck commentary about the 2nd Amendment which I think is very relevant to the Natural Born Citizen qualification of the Constitution for the Office of the President. Why not just change the Constitution if you think you’re so right?

One of the many wonderful things about our progressive Founding Fathers wanting to empower individuals as Citizens rather than Subjects of the King was that they realized in what can only be seen as a bow of humility toward intellectualism that it was true, they may not have been able to predict problems that may arise in the future for which the United States Constitution was not equipped, so they actually put in a direct way to change the Constitution.
If you thought your idea was so good with the population, and so wildly popular there is a mechanism within the Constitution to change it, and it can be done very quickly! All you need is a 2/3rds vote of Congress.

Certainly with the mainstream media behind the usurpation of the Office of the president by an illegal person who’s not qualified for the Office of the President, the consenting Republicans in office like Sen. John McCain who actually received his “Citizen” status by law when he was 11 months old, and his “Natural Born Citizen” status in 2008 by Non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 with only one objection by Republicans, and the majority in the U.S. Senate with Democrats, it would be a cinch right?

If progressive Democrats feel the population is so widely for rescinding the Constitution’s unique qualifications for the Office of the President as a “Natural Born Citizen”, which protects by two generations any person from ascending into the White House by the demand of being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, then why don’t they just change it? Why haven’t they changed it so that for instance a young Supreme Leader from say North Korea could copulate with an American Citizen and finance his off-spring to the head of the U.S. Government long before he passes away?

I mean talk about a good idea! If you were North Korea’s new leader and you wanted to get your hands on the U.S. Nuclear Stock Pile, don’t you think that would be a good plan? I mean that’s all you have to do. Just snatch a poor young American Girl and have a baby with her and bam you have got the White House!

As a dictator you’ve got your entire Country paying you directly all the taxes just like the King of England’s subjects whose duty was to come over to America and subjugate the wild young colonialist in America. You don’t have to rely on contributions to your campaign; you just take it from your subjects at whatever rate you feel will do the job.
What is wrong with that idea Democrats & Republicans?

You know one of the really nice things about this? You don’t have Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Lora Ingram, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, John McCain, Bobby Jindal, Newt Gingrich, even Sarah Palin, and not one of the former Candidate Republican stars who ran for President in 2012 like Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman speaking out against the idea! What could possibly go wrong?

I mean these guys are acting as the best friend of North Korea or Iran’s Supreme Leaders future children. The foreign leaders wouldn’t even have to copulate with the American girl, they could just fly their sperm over here and have it artificially inseminated into the American mother, and bam 9 months later out pops their kid on U.S. Soil, and 35 years later they have their own son or daughter controlling the whole nuclear arsenal of the United States as well as the treasury.

Don’t you think that’s a good idea? Don’t you think that should be a breeze to change in the Constitution with 2/3rds majority in Congress? Look how easy Obamacare passed with a majority in the House, Senate and Obama in the White House. What’s the difference in doing the same thing with the 2nd Amendment if you’re so opposed to an armed American Population? Change it. Change the Constitution if you’re so sure your idea is so good.

You mean to tell me after 5 years Obama can’t change the “Natural Born Citizen” qualification in the Constitution after it has been challenged in Congress with testimony in the Judiciary Committee’s of the House and Senate over and over and over and over as recent as 2000 and 2004?

If you think the idea of requiring a two generation defense in place for the top position of the Executive Branch of our Government and that not doing so is SOOOOO discriminatory that you’re willing to place the entire American Army and the entire nuclear arsenal in the hands of a puppet or subject of the King, then just change it. I’m sure you have the entire population behind changing it, just like you have the entire population behind changing the 2nd Amendment to read “no one has a right to a weapon loaded with bullets”.

Please, let me spell out what a completely asinine paradox this is. It seems obvious but apparently the so called ‘conservative leaders’ don’t get it, so let’s make it very clear okay?

You mean to tell me I’m unreasonable for saying that the “Natural Born Citizen “requirement as a defense of the people from our Executive Branch of Government, meaning a check point of trust by the people from the President, the one guy that controls an entire Branch of the 3 Branches we have in our Government and the one Branch who has all the weapons at its disposal, the one guy who controls the armies of the United States, and has the ability to topple regimes like say Libya, Afghanistan, or in the future Syria without Congressional approval, is something that you would concede on but you want to keep your rifle to protect yourself from a foreign Government invasion?



Maybe you haven’t read the testimonies in 2000 of 106th Congress’s Judicial Committee’s have heard about the really bad idea of exempting the President’s requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, but I have. I can tell you that somehow responsible people with a lot of love for our Country and you personally have made good decisions in not removing that requirement.
I can tell you that it’s really insane, or stupid, or crazy or delusional to freak out about someone wanting to take your rifle while you give the keys away to a dictator that has your own nuclear bomb pointed right at you!
Okay rational hypothetical announcement here coming over the airways with all the major networks covering the President’s press conference:

“My dear sweet constituents who have voted for me time and time again, we’ve come to a road where I just don’t think it’s very good for criminals to to have a gun period. You’ve put me here and it’s been overwhelmingly humbling because, except for the Birthers and their few bastards who tried to take a stand for the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the U.S. Supreme Court, for which we know there is a microcosm of support because they are so awful and foul as to warrant extermination, I have made the executive order that I would like voluntarily for anyone who has a gun to place it in their recycle bin this coming Tuesday. Now, I’ve got the drones equipped with a new metal identifying scanner that can actually see into your house and as far as 4 feet below the surface and plain and simply if that drone flys over your house and detects non-compliance with my executive order this Tuesday, we’ll know your planning insurrection and we’ll with the same drone just drop an incendiary device on your house and your whole family will die. There may be a few women and children that die but you must realize we tried to protect you and simply asked you to comply with turning in a piece of garbage. So it’s really you who killed your children and wife by not complying and if you care so little about your children and wife as to not turn in a piece of garbage, all of society will know your not rational and must be a terrorist. In fact all of your children and wife are probably just as dangerous as you if in hearing this message they don’t turn you in before Tuesday. Now, I’m sorry to interrupt your programming please enjoy the rest of your evening and don’t forget to send me $3 dollars for my Executive Order “Americans for a violent free America.”



This is principally the way the proponents of the 2nd Amendment are seen by the Obama Administration and a good reason to draw attention to it. Why would the Government care about your rifle when they have a nuclear weapon ready and pointed at your head and your entire family as hostages? Don’t you think you’d give up your gun for your children, your wife, your brother, your sister, even your parents?

So the question is who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family? And, how easy would it be to declare those who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family probably not rational people?

Let me just say how much I know and appreciate those who have stood up to Obama and his not being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the president. I know they actually love you, love our Country, and love freedom and liberty.

It speaks volumes about someone willing to take a stand against such odds in the political arena. It speaks volumes for someone who realizes that in protecting the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution for the Office of the president, and its intentions of 2 generations as a defense for the people,born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, that they have the best interest for your family at hand.

If you find a politician willing to fight for your family like that and defend your loved one, I’d think that was a politician that was worth keeping around. It would just make sense.



Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODY JUDY - CODE4PRES
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.us



Tuesday, February 12, 2013

The Global Problem Caused by Obama's Blowing Seeds


The Global Problem Caused by Obama's Blowing Seeds
Why Complain About the Seeds of Obama If You Didn't Complain About the Roots?

Glenn Beck is finally making a little bit of sense, and so is Rush Limbaugh as they are coming to grips that the Republican GOP, is about as dead to conservatism as dead can be.

That spells big trouble for America though. Under Obama the left extreme of the Democrat party is hogging the remote control. Have you ever been in the room with someone who hogged the remote control and constantly turned the volume up and down till you felt you were going to go crazy?

America is struggling; the conservative principles of the Constitution, our sound economic welfare it guides, and simply the common sense most of us regard as essential for success are all struggling as they are being diluted out of existence and or set on the chopping block.

The conservative radio voices are seeing more and more the signs that Obama's directed Fast & Furious gun-running as a domestic operation paralleled in the big fat shadow of Libya "gun-running" to the supposed 'rebels' - al-Qaeda that is a global militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden between August 1988 and late 1989.

One might wonder at Obama and his gratitude towards Osama bin Laden, supposedly killing him, or at the very least "using" his corpse as thunder for the 2012 election. Indeed al-Qaeda members ought to be suspect of their being used by Obama for good reason - he has a capacity of justifying their death and cannot be trusted.

Its kind of like putting an un-loaded gun in someone's hands and then accusing them of drawing fire first while you lay waste to them. Now, al-Qaeda is not my concern, however, if Obama has no problem putting al-Qaeda members and leaders to death and laying seize to the United States Constitution at the same time in his own conspiracy, America can make the conclusion that there is a third party involved of which al-Qaeda at one time fought against- the communism of old Russia as in the invasion of Afghanistan, or even China?

One must ask why China has so stealthily been building a nuke program that now rivals Russia's and the United States? Why are we considering North Korea's test so threatening? In Obama's wild-cow-eyed insanity to dis-arm America he has sparked through gun-running operations to Mexico and Libya the biggest buying operation in U.S. History , and he has provoked the biggest build up of nuclear arsenal in China's history. http://online.wsj.com/article/global_view.html

If for instance Russia wanted to provoke a war aided by Obama at China, al-Qaeda might be the necessary first blood spilt to neither sides grief accept the members of al-Qaeda. Running arms to Syrian rebels (al-Qaeda - Muslim Brotherhood) through Turkey is supposedly or in-directly a real jab at Russia much the same as if Cuba started conducting military recon flights over Florida and testing their own nukes would be to us.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has had no better friend than Vladimir Putin's Russia. Last week, three Russian ships reportedly headed to reinforce Syria and China has all but given Syria a licence to kill. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/russian-chinese-vetoes-gave-syria-license-kill-white-213415115.html

You really have to start thinking about the integrity of Obama and his Administration when you see them siphoning gas out of your own cars gas-tank, but that's exactly whats happening and Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are showing signs of seeing the light.

The only problem is the 2012 election is over and all of their strength instead of being used in the right place, which would have been supporting candidates for President, like myself, in the Judicial actions of removing Obama by the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' in the United States Supreme Court is gone, but that doesn't mean it can't be helped.

Now, just for a minute think to yourself, if Glenn Beck Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the rest of them,had decided to get behind a real candidate supporting the Constitution, not just by his lips but by actions, (such as SCOTUS CASE # JUDY V. OBAMA 12-5276) and threw their weight behind someone like me, your talking 60% of Republicans and nearly 25% of Democrats and massive demonstrations outside of the Supreme Court, do you think Obama would be in the White House?

Today, Glenn Beck went off on former Sen. Chuck Hagel and Obama's CIA Director nominee John Brennan playing clips of his statements referring to Jerusalem as Al Quds (Muslims identity of Jerusalem). Obama has no inhibitions or concerns about alienating and distressing the vast majority of Jews who voted for him and who he now takes for granted.

Hagel faces charges he's received compensation from foreign governments and from an organization called the Friends of Hamas and he's never voted for sanctions against Iran.

Former Governor Mike Huckabee said today , "If true, it absolutely disqualifies him for any consideration even so much as to be a gatekeeper at a national park much less the defense secretary,"
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2013/February/Senate-Committee-to-Vote-on-Hagel-Appointment/

What doesn't make any sense at all is that Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and the Conservative talk show bunch would be up in arms about Obama's appointments whilst they have no objection to Obama in the White House as a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution's demands for a "natural born citizen" unique from the qualifications of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators also found in the Constitution.

That is like complaining about the seeds of a weed blowing about after you confirmed the weed being planted in your garden as a particular fruit you'd accept. I mean what did they expect from a guy whose not a natural born citizen in the White House or to put it a different; do you think Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh would be complaining about "nominations" of Obama if Obama wasn't in the White House at all? Of course they wouldn't.

Could we assume Beck and Limbaugh's' silence towards Obama's not being qualified as a natural born citizen contributed to Obama re-election? Do you think that silence helped Obama or hurt him? Do you think that silence helped me in contributions to my campaign or hurt my getting contributions?

Many people think that because Obama was re-instated illegally and unqualified that somehow makes it okay. It doesn't. I mean if robbing your gas tank was illegal yesterday and the day before its still illegal today and tomorrow. If a weed is bothering you do you think trying to catch all of its seeds is the right course or do you just rip it out by the roots?


Of Course we do need a movement in the Conservative Grass Roots of America, but that movement must be founded in the strengths of our Constitution and if you can't agree that ignoring the qualifications of the President in the Constitution has caused us much more grief then losing the 2nd Amendment or losing Freedom of Speech, you have got your head tied up in a pretzel on whom it is assaulting these rights and threatening them.

Now the sooner they start talking about the root of the problem, which was the abandonment of the Constitution in the qualifications of the Office of the President, the sooner we can get back on track.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8





Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY