Showing posts with label qualification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label qualification. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

STUPID SUPPORTS ISIS in The Office of the President- SCOTUS OPENS UP Obama Alibi

BREAKING NEWS

STUPID SUPPORTS ISIS 
in 
The Office of the President
- - - - -
  SCOTUS OPENS UP Obama Alibi
- - - - - 

The United States Supreme Court Justices have just issued a ruling in the first Conference Hearing since their return from Recess that literally has every lawyer in the Country scratching their heads wondering about the commitment of prohibiting construction precedent to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court Justices. The Case, a Birther Case entitled Elliott v. Cruz 16-13 received a "Denial" September 26th, 2016 which literally reverses every Birther Case since 2008 against Obama wherein "Standing" was cited or "The Political Question Doctrine" as an Obama alibi. 

It seems nearly insane to re-open every Case against Obama's Ineligibility but this new evidence provides just that Gate because the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's argument that a "Citizen" not in the Presidential Race or Contest actually had "Standing" to challenge Obama or Cruz or any Candidate with questionable Constitutional collateral as far as qualification being born either outside the United States (jus soili) or having a mother or a father who are not United States Citizens at the time of the Candidates Birth received by what is called a parental inheritance or jus sanguinis.  

The defense Obama so many times used and counted on was the fact that no one in Government Office who was not running for President, or who had standing could challenge his eligibility and that started with the most famous case that reached the U.S. Supreme Court very early on in the challenging erra of pre-Obama Administration Berg v. Obama which was a Democratic Party Challenge by Philip J Berg who just happened to be a former deputy attorney general for Pennsylvania where the latest ruling of Elliott v. Cruz was initiated.
Philip Berg, a lawyer acting pro se, filed this action challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to run for and serve as President of the United States.   The District Court dismissed Berg's action on the grounds that he lacks standing and failed to state a cognizable claim.
Elliot v. Cruz

Filed by Carmon Elliott (Objector), a registered Republican who resides and votes in Pennsylvania, asserting that the Candidate is ineligible to hold that office under the United States Constitution
Initially, the Candidate contends that we should not address the question of whether he is a “natural born citizen” because it presents a non-justiciable political question. He contends that this doctrine applies because the question of whether a candidate is eligible to take office as President of the United States is within the purview of the Electoral College or the United States Congress.The political question doctrine is invoked only when the framers of the Constitution made clear their intention that the judiciary abstain from resolving a particular question of constitutional interpretation. In Zivotofsky ex rel. Zivotofsky v. Clinton, the United States Supreme Court addressed this doctrine, stating that:In general, the Judiciary has a responsibility to decide cases properly before it, even those it “would gladly avoid.”

By not hearing the Case, the U.S. Supreme Court has opened a Door previously shut, and shut tight against regular Citizens who were not in the race who they perceived did not have standing based on their not being directly affected as Standing requires


1-Injury-in-fact: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent (that is, neither conjectural nor hypothetical; not abstract). The injury can be either economic, non-economic, or both.

2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

With the United States Supreme Court Justices denying Phillip Berg cert because he lacked standing but allowing through a denial the PA State Supreme Court to affirm that Carmon Elliott had standing one can see very clearly a dissociate of Justice in undoubtedly the most important office in the United States of America as head of the Executive Branch.

Remember President Bill Clinton today said Obamacare was the 'craziest' thing he'd ever seen and it took a crazy usurpation to sign the crazy thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YIIqWzfei4



Of course the Standing argument was never made against me as a Presidential Candidate in '08, '12, and 2016 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and 14-9396 , they just said it was 'crazy' like Presidential Bill Clinton just called Obamacare that a calabash cartel could be formed wherein the DNC as a Corporation and Obama's own Campaign as a Corporation could act against the Constitution in bullying the Constitution's Qualification for President out of The People's Choice without Legislation Amending the Constitution per Constitutional Order and pitching off a smaller Candidates Justice to require fairness and equality as a Standard in the Presidential Race according to the rules in the U.S. Constitution.

 I know it sounds crazy doesn't it? How could a usurpation of the highest office in the United States happen or be found frivolous when President Bill Clinton calls Obamacare crazy and Obama's signature as a Qualified President is required to pass all legislation?

Cody Robert Judy's Litigation Cases across the Country 2008-2016
during three Presidential Runs 2008, 2012, 2016
How important is the Constitutional Qualification of a U.S. President?

Well, just one piece of Legislation that has consumed 1/5 of the entire U.S. Economy is 'moot' without a qualified President's signature or a veto override by 2/3 of Congress. Obamacare ring a bell?

The Representatives and Senators in the House and Senate elected to represent the People denied a change to the [natural born Citizen] qualification eight times just since 2003.

Why were challenges against Obama seen as 'doomed'? Well, it had a lot to do with no one having 'Standing' in the Presidential Race who was a popular Elected Representative taking a stand. Republicans could not object until they were chosen to represent as the Republican Nominee the Democratic Nominee, but as a Candidate in the Democratic Party I had Standing against Obama in 2012 and I was the only one to challenge both McCain and Obama in 2008. Although it is a distinguished honor to be the only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan defense in Federal Court, it is not very popular among Republicans and Democrats. Maybe that tells you something of their feelings about the U.S. Constitution?

Still, Hillary Clinton, the crazy Democratic Nominee who defends Obamacare so far as not crazy, and is also bi-polar on TPP, the Alaskan Pipeline, Gay Marriage, Criminal Act, Iraq, etc etc,  along with the usurpation of the Presidency in Obama, and is just as crazy as Obama with her aversion to FOIA as Secretary of State, even though her husband clearly see's Obamacare as crazy, simply detest Birthers. The following Youtube Video details in two minutes just how crazy Hillary Clinton is against Birthers who simply have been Taking A Stand for the U.S. Constitution's qualifications for President survived in the most successful Country on Earth in the last 240 years! That's Crazy!

Clearly the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have a disability problem with the U.S. Constitution with the dichotomy of who is eligible in standing and this opens up a tremendous burden upon all Presidential Candidates to be sued by all Citizens and all of Obama's eligibility suits can and should be reopened with the evidence provided to us by the U.S. Supreme Court that the [natural born Citizen] clause has been adjudicated as no different then the "American Citizen" clause found that is required for Representatives and Senators in the U.S. Constitution.



Hey, it's open season on Construction on the Constitution if you have the right tag. The U.S. Supreme Court Justices are making a joke of the Constitution. Perhaps the clown epidemic is explained to all in Obama's circus and carnival barkers with crazy Obamacare as a Feature? All Senators and Representatives now have standing to sue the President according to the U.S. Supreme Court! Any takers Rep. Trey Gowdy? You'd think Congress could take a hint from the U.S. Supreme Court?

STOP BEING STUPID HILLARY! Love, Birthers



As the U.S. Supreme Court has opened up "Citizens" to purge the Office of the President you can count on the Executive Branch finding itself deluged with law suits which has every lawyer in the Country rolling their eyes at those Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court who have clearly passed their prime and are acting out in a crazy way. This is not a stable Court.

We can tell who is the Faker here when the message is clear from the Justices? Upholding the Constitution in the requirements for the Office held by 42 President's in U.S. History is just to much for them as [Citizens at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution or natural born Citizens] thereafter applies.

They clearly are out of their fruit-loops for the acceptions represented by Chester A. Arthur who burned his identification and Barack Obama who fabricated his?

CRJ


WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP! Exposing corruption is not easy and as someone  who has standing to stand up in this type of Government Corruption Cody Robert Judy still needs your help.


Help Us Now  Contribute to the Campaign!
CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!













Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Hillary's Health Hazard Experts "Parkinson" & Corruption of Government Offices


SPECIAL REPORT
Hillary's Health Hazard Experts "Parkinson's"
Is She Pickling - Hillary's Pickle of Health

Hillary wouldn't be the first to hide a health problem that might compromise the Office of the President.  America might even say it's been pretty lucky so far. The liberal left Media had a field day with R. GOP  Nominee John McCain (72) until he finally released 1,173 pages of personal medical records this week.  President Kennedy had colitis, duodenal ulcers, osteoporosis Addison's disease. President Franklin Roosevelt suffered from Polio but also battled congestive heart failure, hypertension, acute bronchitis and longstanding pulmonary disease, but the days of hiding something as far as health of a Candidate with the modern Media where nearly everyone has a camera and a news-tip hotline at their fingertips is very different and 69 year old Hillary Clinton is suffering and many experts as well as Hillary's own wikiLeaks leaked emails pontificate she has Parkinson's Disease.

The under-cover released news places Hillary Clinton in a very difficult risk, and the Democratic Party nearly out-of-their-mind with bewilderment of what to do with the Billions already invested in 'I'm with Her' and absolutely no cognative recollection of the storm that 2008 Sen. Barack Obama landed upon Sen. John McCain.

In fact, Hillary Clinton appeared Monday on Jimmy Kimmel Live ABC Late-night Show to expose just how wrong the right wing-ding conspiracy tin-foiled hat people were. The only problem with that 'conspiracy' is that it is shall we say 'pickling out'. 
https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/768154685307924484

The health test Jimmy Kimmel asked her to perform on his late-show was to "open" an already 'opened' jar of pickles. I can't personally think of a worse thing to have her open because Parkinson's has everything to do with degenerative disease of the brain. Why wasn't it a bottle of Olives?


[Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that belongs to a group of conditions called movement disorders. It is both chronic, meaning it persists over a long period of time, and progressive, meaning its symptoms grow worse over time. As nerve cells (neurons) in parts of the brain become impaired or die, people may begin to notice problems with movement, tremor, stiffness in the limbs or the trunk of the body, or impaired balance. As these symptoms become more pronounced, people may have difficulty walking, talking, or completing other simple tasks

Parkinson's disease occurs when nerve cells, or neurons, in the brain die or become impaired. Normally, the neurons in this area produce an important brain chemical known as dopamine. Dopamine is a chemical messenger responsible for transmitting signals between the substantia nigra and the next "relay station" of the brain, the corpus striatum, to produce smooth, purposeful movement. Loss of dopamine results in abnormal nerve firing patterns within the brain that cause impaired movement.]

Of course even if Hillary has Parkinson's Disease every person's progression in the disease is different. We already know Hillary Clinton’s campaign has released a letter revealing that Mrs. Clinton is being treated with the drug Coumadin to help prevent blood clots, which she experienced in 1998, 2009, and 2012. Coumadin (also called warfarin) is an anticoagulant intended to prevent blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes.

Ischemic, due to lack of blood flow and Parkinson's are common in an aging population. Cerebral atherosclerosis is a type of atherosclerosis where build-up of plaque in the blood vessels of the brain occurs and some experts have actually suggested it can cause Parkinson's Disease.

Forget about the one page clean bill of health Hillary's Campaign has released as everyone else has and you are left understanding how a mis-diagnosis or a covered one with the least physical stress accessed to the job of the Office of the President as the backdrop, and just look at WHY everyone is so concerned. Hillary's own signs of health are what has everyone concerned.

Hillary's Eyes, Exaggerations, Mini Strokes, Hand Tremors, and Coughing Fits can be trained on, covered, and worked on, but even with all of that those Signs are slipping through the cracks and exposing themselves; and it could cost the Democratic Party the entire election! If a central platform of civil rights for millions of Americans were at stake, it just seems like people who want those protected, including the Candidate herself recusing herself, she would step-out of the Democratic Party Nominee position. 

So far, even the Signs that have been catching fire on the Internet, some with as many as a Million Hits, are not being taken seriously.



In other Campaign News

The Campaign to elect Cody Robert Judy has released another video that suggest the Constitutional Crisis caused by Obama's Ineligibility could still have devastating consequences for our Nation. 




Trump laying Low as a Birther avoiding Media Questions on the subject no mistake. Confirmed Reports indicate evidence now exist Trump is expected to "use" what will Impeach all remaining 8 Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and allow him to nominate 9 Justices to replace the entire High Court. Evidence is confirmed and in his possession on Obama's Fraud and the subsequent Cover- Up by the High Court. In order to legally Repeal and Replace Obamacare that could be a significant key and what will be necessary. Democrats are devastated!

[Throughout United States History there hasn't been to many U.S. Supreme Court Justices impeached. In fact you have to go to Samuel Chase to find an instance of it.  Ultimately, [The Senate voted to acquit Chase of all charges on March 1, 1805. However he is the only U.S. Supreme Court justice to have been impeached.[3]
The impeachment raised constitutional questions over the nature of the judiciary and was the end of a series of efforts to define the appropriate extent of judicial independence under the Constitution. It set the limits of the impeachment power, fixed the concept that the judiciary was prohibited from engaging in partisan politics, defined the role of the judge in a criminal jury trial, and clarified judicial independence. The construction was largely attitudinal as it modified political norms without codifying new legal doctrines.]

While it set limits of the impeachment power, the biggest indiscretion it seems in U.S. History when it comes to the Bench, is indeed the sacrifice of the Constitution's Principles in the context of engaging in partisan politics at the resignation and abdication of the Constitution, it has been the Record of the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and 14-9396 to refrain from the Constitutional Protection Requirement of [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President, especially when U.S. Supreme Court Case Law has defined it in the context without a doubt placing Barack Obama outside the qualification.

The following 13 minute Video illustrates very briefly the danger of the U.S. Supreme Court endorsing Demagogues and disenfranchising those who appose them through the Standard of Law the Justices are bound to uphold in good behavior. 


Available on FACEBOOK

Personally, I think the best intent is to encourage those who are in Offices of confirmation, even for life, that they are there for a specific job, and in not doing the job, or acting against the Law, they can be removed and replaced. The life tenure of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice is no different then the two year Congressmen if a total lack of regards to acting as a disability towards the Constitution in a path of recklessness as understood and as matter of record provides; warnings to the disregard be damned in a most blatant contrive.


HOW HILLARY CLINTON COULD BE INVOLVED

Some speculation as to Hillary Clinton's absolute confidence to act in the Secretary of State position so brashly with her private server set up to avoid FOIA, and brazen collection of millions of dollars from Foreign Governments for The Clinton Charity so blatant that has now come to be included in Trump's attack.


"On Monday, Trump called for the foundation to be shut down and for a special prosecutor to be named to investigate it. In particular, he accused Clinton of having turned the charity into a "pay-for-play" scheme in which wealthy donors to the organization got favors from the State Department while Clinton was secretary of state from 2009-2013. The Clinton campaign denied that, saying Clinton never took any action because of donations to the foundation."

It may just be the Hillary Clinton has the goods on Obama and the Pact is "If I go down, you go down", it's the worst, nastiest, and ugliest part of politic corruption that ultimately causes the people to suffer in order for a few to get away with what they want to get away with. This may be exactly why FBI Director James Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch under Barack Obama have in the face of so much evidence reposed a prosecution.

Judicial Watch is one of the main Groups who has been working hard on uncovering the Clinton Secretary of State Emails that are FOIA eligible. They have also been asking and releasing documents uncovering the Clinton Foundation and the dual roles of foreign visits with her position as secretary of state.

With the Evidence of Clinton's foreign Travels contained in the following comment I received, and answered we have formally notified Judicial Watch of the damages to the Political U.S. Presidential Campaigns for Cody Robert Judy, and have asked them if they would make an inquiry regarding this particular Visit to England and Africa regarding the business conducted at the British Foreign and Common Wealth Office in August of 2009 that Hillary is required by the Judge to answer under Oath.  
Re Comment: 
[Sheriff why don't you send someone to Kenya and London to get copies of h\s Kenya birth certificate.]

 http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html
CRJ
Hillary got them.. ?

However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/.../access-to-public...

Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

 Here is a copy of that letter to Judicial Watch with a few spelling errors corrected:

 Dear Judicial Watch:
Mr. Fitton Esq.


Hillary got them.. I as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 and in the
Democratic Party 2012, and 2016 have has my Campaign very damaged by
Hillary Clinton's Lies and Cover up.

In your depositions Ordered by the Court regarding her Travels as
Secretary of State , the simultaneous conflicting Foreign travel done
for the Clinton Charity Foundation, could you by chance in your
deposition Questions under oath she's ordered to respond to in writing
ask her if she picked up Obama's Foreign Birth Certificates in the UK
-Britain or Kenya- Africa?

In the 2008 National Democratic Convention Pres. Bill Clinton said he
was going to bring this up but never did.

However, evidence shows these records were available for public access
before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary
Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf

Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a
sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the
British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial
protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in
early August of 2009.  African news agency expressed surprise at
Clinton's arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping
in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html?m=1O

BAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD MAY GO TO CRIMINAL COURT YET!
  ?No, I?m just telling you what you?re doing is crazy and you should stop.?

http://www.azfamily.com/clip/12672491/birther-investigation-comes-up-in-arpaio-deposition

That kind of shocked me. . Because it opens up the ?Fraudulent Claim
of the long form Birther Certificate of Obama?s ? into the Court to
dismiss the Case based on libel or slander.

Certainly, Arpaio doesn't have to be subjected to the label of ?Crazy?
by a lawyer who lacks ?expert status? in the Court as a Psychological
Expert, as well an expert in the investigation.

Yeah! Open up that can of crazy and swing away. Might be interesting
to see the definition of ?Crazy? in Court with Obama?s long form birth
certificate as the definition subject to all kinds of Experts and
Court subpoena powers Arpaio now has for his Defense in a Public
Criminal Trial.

Is that the rabbit hole you?re all excited to run down? I hope they
Prosecute because that?s exactly what it needs.

Heck the WHITE HOUSE already has four versions going. That?s what I?d
call a Domestic manufacturing plant that hasn't been shipped over seas
yet.


https://accidentalpatriot4.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/a-tale-of-four-fraudulent-obama-birth-certificates/

I am the only Presidential Candidate in the U.S that sued Sen. John
McCain for failing COTUS Qualifications for Office of President  (
Judy v. McCain LV NV) and Obama #SCOTUS 12-5276 and #14-9396

ABI

ABI Journal
Current IssueArchived IssuesJournal TopicsJournal ColumnsJournal
AuthorsSubmission GuidelinesAdvertise
The Boundaries of Litigation Privilege

Jul/Aug 2003
Straight & Narrow
Journal Article:
Sources abound warning of the vices of gossip, and while most people's
experiences confirm those caveats, the lessons are perhaps nowhere
more cemented than in the checks that pass hands following defamation
actions.

  Professionals of all types have been unfortunate enough to find
themselves in such a suit, either for having a loose tongue or from
being subject to the repercussions of reputation-shattering lies.

  Lawyers must remember that they are not exempted from the rules of
the game of law, and that in some situations they are held to higher
standards than others.

  In particular, attorneys must exercise diligent restraint from
making derogatory publications regarding other attorneys.

Despite these cautions, a recent case came to the Illinois Appellate
Court involving defamation by one law firm of another firm's
reproachable behavior during bankruptcy actions.

Edelman, Combs and Latturner v. Hinshaw and Culbertson, No. 1-01-3638,
slip op. (Ill. App. Div. 2003).

The defendant's inability to justify its defamatory publication by
relying on either litigation or qualified privilege serves to remind
attorneys of their obligation to carefully discern and stay within the
often vague ethical boundaries of professional responsibility.

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2016/08/sheriff-arpaio-swears-birth-certificate-investigation-is-not-yet-done/#comment-377397

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

Cody@codyjudy.us
WEB: codyjudy.us
Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
 WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP! Exposing corruption is not easy and as someone  who has standing to stand up in this type of Government Corruption Cody Robert Judy still needs your help.

Help Us Now  Contribute to the Campaign!
CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


































Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

BIRTHER BENEFITS - A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court Tapping the Stupid-Tree of the MSM

Special Report
FEATURED EDITORIAL
  THE POST & EMAIL
~BIRTHER BENEFITS~
A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court


The Birther Benefits yet escaping the Establishment Groupies of both the Democratic and Republican Parties, as well as the Main Stream Media (MSM) the same way the Brexit did, gives us a Prime example of why Hillary Clinton is about to lose what the Democrats have worked so hard at the last seven and a half years in the election of Republican Party Nominee Donald J. Trump with the ire and outrage of the Nation as the catapult. What? 

How could the Democratic Party let ire and outrage go to waste like that- especially in a sleeping giant that awakens? I know it sounds impossible, but six months ago saying Donald J. Trump never elected as mayor or even dog-catcher was going to be the Republican Nominee at the Republican National Convention was laughable. 

In the good-ole-days Democrats use to be smart people about Civil Rights. You know in the days before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin before they tapped the same stupid-tree Hillary Clinton tapped into when with so many examples in her life she reiterates that in "hindsight it wasn't a good idea" in the form of an apology actually no real sound minded person would buy.

Democrats  have to buy the snake oil though because they got into the pit of selling "The First" rather than actually understanding moral character could not be uploaded and every Citizen had the right to vote already. They started discrimination all over again after they'd just won the battle. That was the same stupid-tree that Obama tapped into in voting "the first" colored person into office, and the same one Hillary decided to tap into asking people to vote based on her sex as "the first" women.

Minorities grabbed the microphone and started selling race, color, and sex as gender asking for preferential treatment or discrimination based upon those particular chromosomes. It's fad now to get preferential treatment based on a chromosome? What makes the KKK different in the supremacist ideology? I see very little difference in the discrimination of color, race, religion, sex, and national origin as I do the preferential treatment of color, race, religion, sex and national origin. Preferential treatment is discrimination and is beating itself upside the head creating divides were they had been mended,

They are after all, bound to the sinking ship of Barack Obama who never was and never will be qualified for the Office of the President according to the U.S. Constitution's demand that only a [natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution be allowed by the Constitution's authority to be President. That was not a discrimination against immigrants or first generation Americans it was a discrimination or qualification of TIME in the interest of allegiance to the Country; really no different than the age/or Time discrimination between the offices of Representative (25), Senator (30), and President (35) that took into account seasons of experience and time on the earth also figured from the moment of birth.

There is a new case in the U.S. Supreme Court that is rattling the Birther Benefits department, and though it does not involve Barack Obama the ramifications will. This Case is titled Carmon Elliott v. Ted Cruz No. 16-13. Whether Obama can skate-out of office, like Hillary Clinton skated out of the Secretary of State office having usurped the office and responsibility to the people in FOIA accountability with her private servers, is questionable and hinging upon a few variables.

The hope of the Birthers in this case might modestly be scaled to the comment of chief anti-birther 'Doc' or Dr. Conspiracy himself Mr. Kevin Davidson on his Blog Obamaconspiracy.org and Post  and Comment pictured here about it.

 [So if I am reading that correctly, the Supreme Court could review the Elliott case if it so chose. And I think Apuzzo's argument that it is not moot is sufficient. I'm not willing to attach the DOOMED graphic to this one.]

  While it's not a fabricated long form birth certificate with layers, and I am not dead like the poor drowned Hawaii Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy, (The only official to say she saw Obama's long form birth certificate -May she rest in peace), I will attest to the validity of the comment in the constructs of my own research into the case that have profound new twist.


They say everything in Obama's Birther Circus and Carnival Barker Town has been litigated and then comes a long a State Court Judge who did not get the 'Obama memo' on this issue- 'you must stay plugged into the stupid-tree' and actually constructs a smart argument that [Standing] is sufficient by any old Citizen wanting to vote for a qualified Candidate, and brilliantly defies [The Political Question Doctrine] - something Judges have been hiding behind for decades on the qualification definition. The two Issues the Pennsylvania State Court Judge plowed through with nuclear powered tank are two issues that have been the malignant tumor-cancers that have plagued Birthers for nearly a decade.

The RED DISTRICT LIGHT flashing for the United States Supreme Court in Elliott v. Cruz 16-13, see Elliott's Go-Fund-Me site here, might just be in the advent of stopping the rogue argument of standing and the political question doctrine that in the process necessitates the Court actually defining [natural born Citizen] in the same light that Roe v. Wade was applicable even though the pregnancy was no more, in the facts presented under the Mootness Standard, that the issue was more than likely going to come up again and again and again in two applications:
1- Voluntary cessation of unlawful conduct
2- Conduct capable of repetition yet evading review

The 'Ark' that was touched in Elliott v. Cruz was that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court 'affirmed' the State Court Judge's 'Opinion' that now if the U.S. Supreme Court does not here walks and talks like the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed also! This may be the last chance the highest Court in the Land gets a chance to weigh in on the Judicial Branches divine appointment to regulate a distinctive application that is part of the United States Constitution. 

As the attorney for the Case Mario Apuzzo Esq. ran around touching all the bases of the Pennsylvania Case, conservative Justice Samuel Alito will chair in handling Motions in the duties of his in the Third Circuit Command,  it was very well articulated the Legislative Branch was not given any powers in the U.S. Constitution to altar or control the definition of [natural born Citizen] in their limited capacity of [naturalization powers] Article I. Section 8 Cl.4 that are codified in the congressional acts of The Naturalization Act 8 U.S Code §1401 Nationals and Citizens at Birth a-h also reviewed in the 14th Amendment.

a- For jus sanguinis U.S. citizenship, i.e., citizenship for the children born abroad of U.S. citizen parents, which is established only by congressional statute and not the U.S. Constitution

b. For jus soli, or "right of the territory" the provisions in Section 1 interpreted to the effect that children born on United States soil, with very few exceptions, are U.S. citizens. (Notice: Not [natural born Citizens] This type of guarantee—legally termed again by congressional statute seen in the 14th Amendment.

[Natural Born Citizen] as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was codified by Nature and Nature's God something the United States Congress was not given authority to over-rule by the definitions of Article I, Section 8, Cl.4, and the Executive Branch sure wasn't given any authority in the U.S. Constitution to interpret [natural born Citizen], neither the MSM or the People's Vote as we here in the United States of America are a Constitution Republic not a mob-is-right Democracy as the Writ of Certiorari  shines the light on. (Ref.pg 10-12)

Finally the [Conflict of Courts] (the very strong basis for the U.S .Supreme Court hearing a Writ of Certioari) comes smashing through the windows of the U.S. Supreme Court!

[In arriving at his holding, Judge Pellegrini and authorities upon whom he relies have concluded that neither the English common law nor the Fourteenth amendment provide the definitive definition of an article II natural born citizen. Where Judge Pellegrini errs is in placing his reliance for his definition of a natural born citizen upon Charles Gordon, Jack Maskell, Paul Clement,and Neal Katyal (footnote 4) rather than on primary historical and legal sources, including decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The arguments of these commentators, who focus on “at birth” and “by birth” rather than on the birth circumstances upon which the Framers relied for defining a natural born citizen, are flawed and cannot serve as any reasonable basis for defining a natural born citizen]

PART II.     THE PROTECTION OF OBAMA HAS BECOME A RACIST ARGUMENT

The Question of Standing has been a criteria of the Court dismissing 95% of the Writ's coming into the United States Supreme Court who recently upheld Affirmative Action at the University of Texas in Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 14-981 , but no where in the U.S. Constitution is affirmative action declared as a protection upon the Qualification of the Office of the President. 

But let's just set that aside, and say the U.S. Supreme Court has indeed received two cases with Standing from 2008 Write-In Candidate and 2012 and 2016 [Democratic Party] Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy who has suffered a great deal of damages the Court saw fit not to recognize in even hearing that asks the exact same questions for the Court to define [natural born Citizen] giving much the same argument in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396.
The last case 14-9396 considered closed only October of 2015 (9 months ago) denied arbitrarily the Petitioner's right to have the fees and printing cost waved due to poverty. The court was even sent bank statements showing no possible way to pay the cost of printing and filing fees, yet Justice Sotomayor, presumed to be notable for low income people, responsible for the Tenth Circuit handling of Motions, deliberately slashed the tires of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in an outrageous affront to low income people!

This has done more for Donald J. Trump's Campaign to the Republican Nomination than any single thing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently called Donald J. Trump a 'Faker', and that is true in the Birther Fields in that Donald J. Trump never filed a single legal paper against his unqualified opponents even when he had Standing to do just that preferring a 'Bullies Way of doing things' to that of Law and Order!

 While Justice Ginsburg rationalized if Donald J. Trump gets in the Office of the President "everything is up for grabs", Democrats are aghast to the support the U.S. Supreme Court has flat-out given as an endorsement to Donald J. Trump as the King of Birthers without filing a single legal brief. Indeed, the issue is hotly contested in the 2016 election as Slate.com just two days ago published 141 Lies Donald Trump's told- Number 33 [Questioned President Obama’s American citizenship, bringing the “birther” campaign into the mainstream]

Hey it's not [Citizenship] it's [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President.

Still the MSM as well as the Liberal Left of the Court, doesn't seem to get they are on the opposite side of the Brexit Standard in their pejorative of Birthers in the United States of America and compared to Hillary's 5 Lies, just in the latest FBI Criminal Investigation Review, they make Trump out to be a hero for questioning Obama for a Standard of Law equal under the Supreme Law of the Land totally bewildered of the General Population's (SMH) disbelief at their tap to the stupid-tree!

 The Supreme Court of the United States blatantly not hearing a case that has had a [Bipartisan Standing] (Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama) is and has paved the way for the reality of Justice Ginsburg HOLY GRAIL DECLARATION that "everything is up for grabs", if Trump is elected President with the nominations most likely to occur in the Court during the next four years.

What we are to gather from this is the Stupid-Tree Tappers are willing to give up Choice for Women, Same Sex Marriage for Citizens, Health Care, and whatever else is on the agenda of the Left including $15 dollars per hour for Obama's Ineligibility! I ask them, "Is that WORTH IT? Is that worth it?!

Apparently this is the Left Liberals giving the American Bird Sign to the Left of the Court and the part of the story where the head of the snake eats the tail and consumes itself into obliteration. That's the Stupid-Tree! Democrats have lost their mind, and they are about to lose a lot more than that and be just as surprised Election Morning as the world was at Brexit.

Of course there is a solution! Lock her Up in an orchard of Stupid Trees and let her nurse on them till she dies; get her as far away from Government Office as one can possible get. Maybe Syria where she can enjoy her reality of sniper fire and cattle futures and the way a 500% increase of refugees can be least expensive - shipping her there instead of bring them here? She'd could be with her experience a great Ambassador to them as Chris Stevens was. 

The Democratic Party National Convention is not for two more weeks and in Gore v. Bush the Court decided the outcome in eight days. It is not impossible for the Court to acknowledge a mistake and in hindsight regret their decision to devastate the poor who have come to the Court for Justice in Truth and Faithfulness against the Lies and Deceit. 

Otherwise.., what can we say? They just do not care about anything or any body and they proved it to us. Their Court will not last another four years.

CRJ 
www.codyjudy.us






CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)