Showing posts with label scalia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scalia. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Where Did He Stand on Obama's Q - Question in Confirmation Hearings to Justice Neil Gorsuch

FEATURED EDITORIAL
ThePost&Email


BIGGEST FRAUD CASE IN U.S. HISTORY 
WHERE DID Justice Gorsuch Reside on Barack Obama's Qualification?

WHERE DID DONALD J TRUMP's Nomination of  10th Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Neil Gorsuch come down on Barack Obama's Qualification for U.S. President?


The grueling nomination process has only just begun for Justice Neil Gorsuch who no doubt will face a tidal wave of opposition from Democrats. For now, Democrat opposition will need to be courted by Republicans who lack a 60 majority vote in the Senate. Confirmation of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice was the only thing Sen. Reid left in tact on the opposition minority scant menu that the nuclear option of a simple majority would not do.

Therefore it would take yet another U.S. Senate Rule change, again, to wipe the minority party power completely off the Constitutional wagon train. Most of Trump's Cabinet picks, like Obama's, have been pushed through with a simple majority confirmation.

Conservatives all over the Media in television and radio have been singing praises about President Trump's nomination of the Constitutional Originalist Justice Gorsuch. Even Glenn Beck said he didn't think Trump would do it, but he did with his nomination pick chiming Justice Anton Scalia would be proud. 

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has had a few Cases sent to it that put Obama's Qualification in the cross hairs of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court precedent Case Minor v. Happersett sited as having no doubt that those born in the Country to it's Citizens were indeed the natural born Citizens.

So what argument do we know that Justice Neil Gorsuch would have Reviewed in the 10th Circuit Duty of upholding the U.S. Constitution Qualifications for President?

Here is one argument that a panel of three Judges decided on the 10th Circuit who Justice Neil Gorsuch was not part of, but who later was indeed asked to Review their Decision En Blanc and what might be gathered from the proceedings as far as Constitutional Original-ism and Conservatism per se? This might be a good question to ask him about in his Confirmation Hearings as the American People look on.
Appellate courts in the United States sometimes grant rehearing en banc to reconsider a decision of a panel of the court (generally consisting of only three judges) in which the case concerns a matter of exceptional public importance or the panel's decision appears to conflict with a prior decision of the court.

https://www.scribd.com/document/254647553/Petition-for-Rehearing-En-Blanc




The result was that the Review En Blanc was denied, which meant that there lacked apposing fews enough to overturn the three Judge Panel, which I mentioned Justice Gorsuch was not a part of. It would be interesting to notice how he ruled on it or if it came across his desk. We just do not know, but that can change with a direct question while he is under oath in his confirmation hearings.

I think it would be a good question coming from Democrats or Republicans really. Perhaps coming from a Democrat Senator the question could be posed to Show conservatives just how conservative or originalist the Nominee is to conservatives? At one time 65% of Republicans did not believe Obama was born in the United States and many even after the Release of the long form birth certificate that Obama produced do not.

It is of the most important issues of the day that people are concerned about what their Justices think, and this issue should not be buried from the very important question even late Justice Anton Scalia was asked one time.
1- Following the luncheon and Scalia’s address to the assembly, an individual calling himself “Patriotic Citizen TM” purchased a copy of the book, stood in line to have Scalia autograph it, and then seized on the opportunity to ask, “U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5: Is it your understanding a ‘natural born Citizen’ is a person born in the U.S. to two US-citizen parents?”
Scalia then responded, “Uhh… Umm… Ahh… I have to research that.”
Read more at
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/05/report-patriotic-citizen-asks-scotus.html#8S9WD6byKcz4K68i.99

2- Criminal Complaint Letter to SCOTUS Justices  filed http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/02/breaking-news-criminal-complaint-filed.html

3- Revenge of the Birthers - is it coming?

Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.
55,000 + Hits in just a few weeks!
Obama's Last Press Conference BLOWS UP with Birth Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

It's time to thank you once again for your 410,000 Views. We are honored to have you and hope you will come back!

Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm



CRJ
See the Latest Motion Filed:

Constitution like it was your savior. Letting it go will only open your eyes to being run over by a bully and that is no fun. 

https://www.scribd.com/document/337654567/Cody-Robert-Judy-Motion-for-Relief-of-Judgement-Rule-60?secret_password=i7WZym3ksLujNIV0FLo3




Even the New York Times recognized that the U.S. Supreme Court was faulty at Hearing and upholding Minor v. Happersett in the face of the Obama's assault on Civil Rights.

CRJ




The reason Cody wants you to understand that the Race for the Presidency is a really tough marathon race is because of the Standards of the Race that are defined in the U.S. Constitution have been something he specifically has stood up for with the standing that is represented by competitors in the Race. 
Check Mate is still a question as long as the U.S. Supreme Court has Action Available. That action could be sustained as a Court Error or Clerical Error very easily.

























































Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Slam SCOTUS- Worst Mistake In Obama's Political Career See Judy v. Obama 12-5276


The Worst Mistake in Obama's Political Career Slamming the Supreme Court of the United States.

Obama blast the U.S. Supreme Court stating he doesn't want foreigners dictating elections, how about the "foreign or fake Natural Born Citizen" in the White House SCOTUS - See Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - Time to make Obama grimace? Pass it on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=k92SerxLWtc&NR=1



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=4pB5uR3zgsA



In a report from The Hill, http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/legal-challenges/249961-5-takeaways-from-toobin-book-on-roberts-obama
, about Jeffrey Toobin's latest book "The Oath", chronicling the Roberts court and the Obama presidency, that is released today (Sept 18th,2012)I think the most interesting aspect is the gloating Obama does with a full Democratic Party Congress behind him bashing the Court to a standing ovation.

You just never know when something is going to come up and bite you from the past do you?

Did the White House or Obama consider political fallout in a standing ovation of ridicule towards the United States Supreme Court in his own Achilles heel - The natural born citizen requirement for the Office of the President?

Excerpt from The Hill Article-

[Republicans criticized President Obama for disagreeing with the Citizens United ruling in his 2010 State of the Union address. But no one in the White House had even considered the risk of publicly disagreeing with the court.
"During the discussions in [Rahm] Emanuel's office, as well as the president's own prep sessions, the propriety of challenging the Supreme Court had never come up," Toobin writes. "The group was so focused on pushing Obama's agenda that the issue of the justices' presence seems not to have occurred to anyone. The administration's anger about Citizens United was such that (even though no one said this specifically) the Obama team simply regarded the Supreme Court majority as another group of Republicans, deserving no greater deference than GOP senators or congressmen."]

As far as looking at the law with different spectacles there is no doubt that Congress was fed the bed of lies in Congressional Research Report of Minor v. Happersett that had "natural born citizen" suspiciously removed from the inquiring eyes of Congress, and the political embarrassment is far reaching.

Please enjoy the following highlighting the Jack Maskell Memo to Congress in the Congressional Research Service (CRS)reports, that fooled Congress for Obama.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H64THoYqGoQ




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJwFnVmLor8



Well, I for one certainly understand the United States Supreme Court above holding a grudge, but I sure won't forget that fact that Justice Roberts had to retrieve "The Oath" a second time from Obama because, I believe, it was not administered to a properly qualified person.

That is the biggest reason for The United States Supreme Court to consider that Obama should not be allowed to occupy the office of the President, now they have a damaged candidate for President who has objected to Obama's qualifications, the complaint sitting on their desk as Judy v. Obama 12-5276 before a General Election has taken place, but after Obama was indeed announced to be the nominee of the Democratic Party.

That is my cause of action from which relief can be administered and the American People can at least have the Constitution upheld and perhaps won't be dis-enfranchised of their vote by the authority of those who are to interpret the Constitution.

Please make a contribution today and Take A Stand with Cody Robert Judy, as America has a process to amend the Constitution and Obama has just skirted America. Please pass this on to 25 of your friends.
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593