Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Breaking Report: PRESIDENTIAL POLITICAL PAUPERIS The U.S. Supreme Court Case Primed to Define NBCtzn

Breaking Report: Featured at The POST & EMAIL

The U.S. Supreme Court Case Primed to Define Natural Born Citizen

Carl Hulse, New York Times Washington Editor and accomplished writer has opined a piece in the New York Times with the Trump "It May Be Time to Resolve the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen"

Indeed TIME maybe the very consideration of both [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents espousing two generations of USA allegiance, as well as the consideration of the progressive liberal concern bringing up the conservative qualification for the Office of the President in light of 17 foreign born members of Congress as well as the 7 year mark that Barack Obama just passed in the Office of the President.

Indeed Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has come into the high-beam Birther Headlights with Leading Poll GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump asserting, who Cruz calls the left wing liberal activist lawyer Lawrence H. Tribe who was Al Gore's Lawyer in Bush v. Gore as well a Hillary Clinton supporter, that there were some very big Constitutional scholars who are saying Cruz is not eligible in the last GOP Debate.

Incidentally, Cruz left out of his commentary in the debate about Lawrence H. Tribe that he had cited him in commentary twice in Cases he had argued. The Medellin v. Texas Brief and Columbia v. Heller case principled around the second amendment individual right to bear arms.

It is the case the liberal and conservatism in many respects make good bed-fellows. After all, the bedrock legislative mandate for qualification of [natural born Citizen] remains one of the last bastions of hope for the U.S. Constitution unchanged in the Founding ARTICLES.

Ultimately Cruz apposes as a conservative along with what would be a solid majority of Conservative Based Media the [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] holding of precedent conducted by the Minor v. Happersett's U.S. Supreme Court. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity have all disparaged the [natural born Citizen] Birther arguments and refused to even host the legitimate Big Players in the Birther Movement born in modern era of 2008 questions regarding Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama's ineligibility based on two fundamental questions: Place and Parents

With Obama it was : Parents and Place
1- The conferred Citizenship of his father who was never a U.S. Citizen but rather citizen of Kenya.
2- The confusion between lawful agencies the public has looked to circumscribing confusion around Obama's birth place with Hawaii Officials and Sheriff Joe Arpiao's Cold Case Posse Investigation directed out of necessity of Citizen of Arizona.

With McCain it was mainly:
1- Born in Panama

As a founding Principle in the Articles of the Constitution the [natural born Citizen] clause may have indeed been one of the very few principles that liberals and conservatives of the time could agree upon and it is quite interesting to notice that those pretending 'conservative' principles are now so apposed to it and those who are touted liberal may indeed now be turning for it.

Nothing in the Grim-Reapers's theater of fears and horrible night terrors grips most of the liberal progressives than that of a Cruz Administration. The one that dances with the devil entertaining an end to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices [Life Tenure] based on the ability to drift from the conservative round-tables of Pro-Life and Defense of Marriage Act that protected opposite gender marriage and ultimately smash Planned Parenthood in the mouth hard.

It's not hard to imagine that just as the winds of Obama have sped up the liberal agenda to the north, that a Cruz Administration could not speed up conservative agenda to the south just as strong wiping out [Life Tenure] in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The concerns of Balance are brought up when of course our Checks and Balances begin to fail us.

Part II.
Checks and Balances and Political Pauperis

One of the great successes of America has been the relative difficult prospect of changing the Constitution. As the New York Times article mentioned " ...changing the Constitution is purposefully complicated and requires overwhelming backing from Congress and state legislatures." Indeed it may be the eight attempts by some members of Congress to change the [natural born Citizen] clause required for the Office of President and Vice President since 2003 that gives The People the vote through their elected officials, that this is not to be changed. It has always been The People's Will and should not change until Congress has a 2/3rds majority authorizing it by the will of the People.

The Courts are only to decide wither Legislation by Congress is Unconstitutional. The Standard of that is The U.S. Constitution. While Obama has largely remained unscathed by the arguments against his eligibility as a [natural born Citizen] it has not been because it did not reach the U.S. Supreme Court. In Fact, Judy v. Obama 14-9396 just two months ago suffered the greatest discrimination of Political Pauperis by the Court as you could imagine.

Yes! Imagine the headlines in the New York Times now wanting after 7 years of Obama unscathed by a real Trial in Court on his eligibility , the matter resolved? Of course Ted Cruz supporters are pointing to Obama as he got away with it, why can't Sen. Cruz?

The case which is so ripe and primed for the U.S. Supreme Court to take is a case brought by a Presidential Candidate in fact in the Democratic Party against Barack Obama, however, it has listed in it Sen. Cruz half a dozen times. Indeed hearing the case has become if you count the New York Times influence a Main Stream Media Trumpet.

While it plays into the Donald Trump's hand to wipe out his closest rival Ted Cruz, it also plays into former Governor Jeb Bush's hand to absorb Ted Cruz's constituents after Cruz is found ineligible. And while not hearing the Case may play into Mr. Trump's hand because he obviously is content with the loud speaker over Court Documents for a ruling, Mr. Judy's Camp in 2016 is weakened by the Court not hearing it. So is the Court [not hearing] the Case helping Mr. Trump more or hurting Mr. Judy? How is it helping Obama, how is it affecting H. Clinton, and would hearing it hurt Mr. Trump?

Of course these are all political questions and the Court has a scape-goat called the political doctrine question, however, the wisdom in using it and waiting for an Election to bring to them a case like Bush v. Gore is insane, when the relative sublime case of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 exist without an Election hinging in the balances.

This allows as Question Number 1 suggest the Court to render an Opinion that could be far reaching in getting America back on the same page when it comes to the Qualification of the President nipping in the bud what really could escalate into a Civil War that could end Life Tenure for the U.S. Supreme Court permanently. Probably the biggest most pivotal issue of our Time is indeed this case.

Cody Robert Judy is the only American Candidate running for President who indeed holds a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on both major Parties in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama.  The problem with his 14-9396 Case was not a matter of the question not being right, it had to do with his Forma Pauperis Motion being denied. Judy lacked the funds to produce the printing cost and filing fees required by the U.S. Supreme Court.

He had also lacked the funds for the two Lower Courts the case came out of in the Federal District Court Utah Division and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, however those courts granted him Forma Pauperis. Based on the U.S. Supreme Court not granting him the right to proceed with his Writ of Certiorari by granting his Forma Pauperis, the Federal Form for the Motion being a 12 Month Form, the Case coming in the same year, and the Court not denying his Motion based on Rule 39.8 abusive and excessive filings, it is Mr. Judy's Opinion based on the facts that the U.S. Supreme Court has basically engaged in a Presidential Political Pauperis and it is representative of the #waronpoor Senator Bernie Sanders has taken to new heights in his platform for President.

There is however no U.S. Supreme Court Rule that states that the Supreme Court Justices cannot go back and revisit this Motion for Review. Mistakes can happen, and Mr. Judy hopes that it is indeed a mistake that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerks may have been involved in and the Justices are not even perhaps aware of.

Of course if the New York Times would take the time to research cases found Denied in October of 2015, a short 2.5 months ago, and print a story about it, their wishes that the U.S. Supreme Court actually hear the case that could indeed save the Country from a bitter political division hinging on an election could be avoided.


My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

No comments:

Post a Comment