Showing posts with label sharon rondeau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sharon rondeau. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

TOP SECRET REPORT LEAKED -The Caliber Needed to Remove the FOX-DOG



THE CALIBER NEEDED TO REMOVE THE FOX-DOG


In Response to the Editor in Chief's question at The POST & EMAIL

From: art2pat35@hotmail.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: QUESTION
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:55:14 -0500

Hi Cody, if this is overstepping on my part, let me know.
Now that it's January, have you heard anything more about impeachment hearings?
Sharon


Sharon
Sorry to have let this go so long, I've been on abit of a winter vaca with the Sundance Film Festival happening here in Utah, that I posted abit about w two videos at the end of the link.

Your question is no doubt rooted in the TOP SECRET REPORT Leaked Congress has Obama Eligiblity In Their Sites.

I know its January for only a short 10 more days and the Republicans did not take a stand on the budget again as they did before but let me address your Jan. 15th inquiry because there has been some significant things happening.

I will report without names that many Republicans hoped that a 'scandal' on Obama's actions like Benghazi would result in the implication enough to remove Obama, which in my opinon has remained much more doubtful because "National Security" turns in Obama's favor on most of them and the "race card" is always there for him.

My position has been arguing that nothing is sufficient short of the Constitution's qualification for the Office of the President as the caliber needed to remove Obama as a disablity because the 'race' card cannot be pulled with my testimony as I sued both he and McCain in 2008 and Obama in 2012 maintaining my standing, and it turns the national security issue on Obama rather then him being able to use it, for instance as Hillary Clinton did during Congressional Hearings..."What difference does it make now?" I'm sure you recall those words out of her mouth.

The most exciting thing to happen in January that I have had to just bite my lip and sit on my hands about Sharon is Governor Christie's Bridge-gate. This was so defining in the political arena and I don't think anyone's hit it on the button yet as far as the story and the real story is pretty far removed from Governor Christie.

Here's the real story. When McCain was running against Obama there was a truce between Republicans and Democrats on the eligibility of candidates because both were not qualified!

That truce HAD to continue through 2012 Election cycle because Obama was part of that, and Republicans, couldn't seek without being implemented, Obama's removal on qualification's demands of the Constitution.

As you probably know, what happened to begin with - It was September and Christie was full steam into his re-election bid -- which he won two months later. Wildstein, who Christie appointed to a high position at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, ordered the closing of two of the three lanes of traffic leading to the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee. It held up motorists trying to make it into Manhattan and caused days of massive traffic jams in Fort Lee, where the Democratic mayor Mark Sokolich had declined to endorse Christie for re-election.

The KEY word in the afformentioned paragraph is what? Well, its "DEMOCRATIC MAYOR"... which ties very closely to Democratic Party pre-sumptive candidate Hillary Clinton who has herself a Benghazi problem to deal with where Gov. Christie has probably won enough votes on the left hugging Obama as he needed to win an election against her.

In short, the timing of this release on Governor Christie is priceless and if you think it wasn't timed perfectly you just don't know Democratic Party calculations in the political arena in planning down the pike.

What this in real time effect did however was what?

It BROKE the truce between the Republicans and the Democrats on the grounds of Presidential Candidates and you had better believe if there was anything that Republicans should have learned with Mitt Romney's lights getn' knocked out in 2012 and his good natured gentlemenly ways, that are about as needed in a political fight as running for second place would be, is that it doesn't pay off.

I believe now Governor Christie has had the front lights of his vehicle knocked out by Democrats that Republicans will FINALLY come to a realization that political life now depends on knocking Hillary Clinton back just as hard. The only way to do that is to tie her to an Obama Administration that she kept her mouth shut over.

As you know she and her supporters started the birther movement and then abandoned it. The Republicans whip that caliber of rifle out and fire it you'd see a wound so deep you could garentee the Democrats lose the Presidency for 2016 and probably re-take maintain the House and surge in the Senate in 2014.

I think Democrats strategically were deathly afraid of Governor Christies' presidential party in 2016 and threw him into the media blender without regard to Republicans every figuring out what would happen to Hillary if Obama was finally made to toe a constitutional congressional hearing on his qualification demands for a natural born citizen.

Of course this is an opinion piece if you wanted to write about it or publish it, but one that is intrigueing and has substance as far as events happening in January regarding the Presidential race.

Of course we can hope for more, and probably will have to settle for less. Republicans also have got to figure away to keep an independent revolution from taking hold on the polical arena so hard that they lose control in the moment of seizing it. An Independent Party so powerful could spring up within the Nation overnight with an Obama disability/impeachment hearing. This has always been my concern or question. Why would the Republicans do me a favor as an independent candidate unless their very existence was being trashed and burned. I think Governor Christie's actions though negliable wasn't all that big of a dog-poop that it couldn't have remained buried.

Democrats obviously chose not to let it remain buried, so Republicans know seriously they are being trashed and burned and perhaps coming clean on Obama's eligiblity would score them points with independents politically. Of course they can use the fact that its been thoroughly vetted in the Courts but that its come back to them as "an Offense against the Law of Nations" under Article I, Sect 7 of the United States Constitution.

That gets them off the hook as far as liablity might be concerned. My testimony shrivels up the balls of the 'race card' because I sued both McCain and Obama in '08, and the national security issue is definitely turned against Obama on the qualification concern. That's the caliber of argument that is needed for not only now, but against Hillary Clinton in 2016.

I'm sorry there is nothing I have permission to release at this time further, I wish there was, but I will say I am yet hopeful for a full Congressional Hearing on the matter in a verification of qualification on Barack Obama/Soetoro.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

The Coasting Code-Care Act


Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand




Monday, November 19, 2012

BREAKING: ELECTION 2012 U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN


http://www.scribd.com/doc/113860602/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Affidavit-affirmation-of-Petition-for-Rehearing-timing


Update Nov. 24th 2012: I want to thank the following individuals for their contributions towards upholding our Constitution and encourage others to step up to the plate and help us. Fight! Stand! Deliver! This is the most important and only challenge to the Election 2012 in the United States Supreme Court at this time. It usually takes years. Your support for this United States Supreme Court challenge in the election of 2012 Judy v. Obama 12-5276 is key to upholding our Constitution and the integrity of our Country's election process.

Thank you Phillip Solarz- Michigan for your $10 contribution!Thank you Mary Keen from Maine for your $100 contribution on Thanksgiving Day! Thank you Rachel Smith Utah for your $10 contribution! Thank you Robert Moran Florida for your $10 contribution!Thank you Mark Wilson Georgia for your $10 contribution!Thank you Barbara Pafundi Florida for your $30 contribution! Thank you Robert E Dwyer North Carolina for your $1 contribution! Thank you Deborah Shelton Texas for your $25 dollar contribution!Thank you Christina Danielson Florida for your $20 dollar contribution! Thank you Jim Black-Florida for your $75 contribution! Thank you Larry Radkan- West Virgina for your $5 contribution! Thank you Haskell Bass- Oklahoma for your $100 dollar contribution! Thank you Richard Larson- California for your $5 contribution! Thank you Oscar Savaryn- Maryland for your $25 dollar contribution


BREAKING: ELECTION 2012 U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN

My love for God is the sweetness in my life and when I saw the new movie Lincoln over Thanksgiving I just wept in understanding what it was like to go against everyone who was saying it can't be done. I know without a shadow of a doubt of God's love for our Country and his direction to me of which I am honored to serve, and by the Constitution you don't have to be a majority to win. If the majority chooses un-constitutional, the Republic's minority can win. ;) www.codyjudy.blogspot.com


No sooner had the ink dried on The Post & Email feature story Sharon Rondeau had done Sunday Nov.18TH entitled “ Presidential Candidate's Eligibility Challenge Moves Forward at U.S. Supreme Court pb WILL THE ELIGIBILITY QUESTION FINALLY BE ANSWERED?”, than double trouble begin brewing in the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Petition For Rehearing begin with an official pro se appeal letter to Chief Justice John Roberts October 6th , just 6 days after the official “Denied” entry was posted on the docket October 1st.

It’s no secret that Cody Robert Judy’s Writ of Certiorari went through an excruciating and exhaustive excoriation by the United States Supreme Court Clerk’s Office in early July denied at least 7 times, but what was amazing is as soon as another Georgia Supreme Court appeal came through on Obama’s eligibility Cody was given a case number.

Call it irony, or luck, or more likely call it “cover” for chucking all the Obama eligibility challenges into a pile marked “dismissed for lack of standing”, but that’s been the going freight charge that hasn't allowed any case to make it passed “GO” in the United States Supreme Court.

Cody said a few months back, “ I could see the writing on the wall. It was just too obvious as to what was happening after being denied so blatantly this summer out of the Court Session and into the Fall Session which was closer to the Election. My biggest question really was ‘has this got to do with what the Justices are actually doing or is justice being manipulated to the Justices by some clerk?’, which would be a huge scandal in the Court.”

With that little bit of prep for the story, here’s what Cody said today.

Today, (Monday -November 19th) a day when I am usually gone out of the office and many times out of town, some changes had taken place which called for my being here and taking care of my son.

We were at McDonalds about Noon for a bite to eat and the impression hit me to call the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk’s office and ask them why my “Petition for Rehearing” had not been placed on the docket yet.

I actually wondered because I've called before if it was too soon to call because packages have to go through a security detail and I knew mine had arrived there on Thursday. They have told me a time or two to give them a week after a package arrives to see it on the docket.

Incidentally, or not, I've actually only managed to get the case Analyst assigned to me one time out of maybe a dozen, and she’s the one who told me that. The rest of the time I've got her answering machine and though I've asked for a call back from her, she has never complied with that request.

So you understand a little bit how surprised I was today when I caved in to the strong impression and called a little earlier, and actually was put through to her personally, and didn't get her answering machine.

I asked her where my Petition for Rehearing was at and she told me she’d sent it back to me and that the letter from the Clerk’s office telling me to submit it within 15 days of their Nov. 7th letter was wrong and that the timing had actually run out for me to file that.

I said, “Wait a minute, I filed a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts you should have on your docket entitled “RECONSIDERATION request” on October 6th, just six days after the official ruling Oct 1st. Six days isn't even close to being the 25 days allowed.

I said, then you guys told me I had to submit a formal motion which I did within 25 days. You received that one and sent it back to me stating it didn't comply with Rule 44 telling me I had to resubmit it properly giving me a time frame to do it in. I obliged you in that. Now you’re telling me my letter dated October 6th isn't the date you’re going by? I told her that information was in the Petition for Rehearing did you read it?

She said, Well we are not suppose to read the documents submitted, we just take care of timing problems if something is late. You submit an affidavit stating what you've told me and and we’ll take another look at it.

I said, how are you going to be able to discern my affidavit when it comes if you don’t read the documents that come in and just send them back? She did this to me before with my Writ of Certiorari and I resubmitted without any changes and was given a case number but the timing was all working for Obama.

I was just livid that I would have to file another document based on her incompetence to simply look at the record, but I took a deep breath and started typing.
We finished up at McDonalds at about 3pm. Stradda had a blast playing with all the kids that long. It was like a revolving door of new friends walking in for him to be excited to meet and play with.

We went over to the printers and got a copy printed. Then, ran to the bank for a Notarization: then, it was back to the printers for 14 copies to be made with the Notary Seal and signatures on it, as well as getting a PDF file made, so we could email to Obama’s attorney and the Secretary of state in Georgia.

Here is what was made. http://www.scribd.com/doc/113860602/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Affidavit-affirmation-of-Petition-for-Rehearing-timing


Then it was about 4pm and I was thinking I wonder wonder wonder..if by chance? Our mail comes about 4:00pm so we headed home with the documents we had made. As I rolled up to our place, sure enough sticking out of the mail box was the package to from the U.S. Supreme court with my returned “Petition for Rehearing” stuffed inside and the letter from the Clerk stating what she’d told me.

Well, we didn’t even turn the car off. I grabbed it and headed for the Post Office and had everything back in the mail to the United States Supreme Court by 4:30 pm.
I can’t believe all the “ifs” involved with this. If I hadn't been watching my son I would have been busy working or out of town and would have never been able to get it back to the Court before the Thanksgiving Holiday.

If I hadn’t have called I could not have had the documents ready to insert them back in the mail the same day I received them and it would have still not been there before the Thanksgiving Holiday if I’d sent them tomorrow.

Its feeling like I made a home-run today. Knocked it clear out of the ballpark and rounded every base. It’s just feeling like this case is not my own and that some divine providence is watching over it for which I am or seem to be a grateful watcher just like you, even though I’m playing a part in it.

We had a little fund raiser last week and raised $31 dollars. My campaign didn't go into debt so I don’t want you to think that every dollar you may contribute is not going directly to this case and this cause. I can’t do this on my own, nor should I have to.

I was thinking this morning if the Court decided to hear this case I’d have to get back to Washington DC and I don’t even have the money to do that. I need you to help me. This is our Country, our Constitution we’re taking a stand for.

Lady at the bank told me it was good to see me today, but she was wishing she hadn't seen me. I said why? She said, because if I hadn't seen you then you might have been in Washington DC doing something about the election.

I told her it’s not over. I’ve got Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court and if he’s proven ineligible its game over for him. She said, “just promise me you’ll do something about Obamacare.” I said, “You got it.”

You know it’s not really a good sign when people in banks are pleading with you.
Well, anyway that’s what happened today and I need your help. I think about businesses who are adding up what Obama care’s going to cost them and either cutting their employees or making them take a cut for it, and its hard for me to understand why every business in America isn’t behind me sending me $100 or $2500.

You know it’s going to cost them that much per employee, so from my perspective their dollars are very wisely spent on my Campaign.

Forget about Mitt Romney right now, lick your wounds, but this is Uncle Sam pointing at you telling you “ I NEED YOU NOW ”

I also got the web site back up which was flickering out by paying for another month. Now I need your help. Please log on and figure out what you can send me that’s not going to break your back, but that you feel is actually saving for you if we win and Obama is proven to be ineligible by the demands of the Constitution for a natural born citizen.

Do it now please, because when the Court decides to hear this case I’ve got to buy airplane tickets and it takes me two days to make a transaction from Paypal to my account and we might not have two days.

I don’t want my next blog to say, “Supreme Court decides to hear the case Judy v. Obama but Judy never showed up because no one believing in the Constitution would help the poor guy out a few bucks and he couldn’t get a plane ticket. So isn’t it funny, Obama actually broke everyone so bad that they couldn’t even take a stand for the Constitution in the United States Supreme Court when the opportunity was presented to them? Guess they’d pinned all their hope and money on Romney and there just wasn’t enough to round 3rd place and bring it home for Conservatives.”

You know I want you to remember this very important message I’ve been trying to get through that big elephant skull so they’d get off their Ass. Now listen, you don’t have to be a majority to win if the majority has chosen something unconstitutional. A minority in this Country can rule if they take a stand for the Constitution, because this is a Republic founded on the United States Constitution as the Supreme law of the land.

The unconstitutional thing the majority has chosen is none other than Obama. Obama is a walking talking violation of the Constitution in the White House. Now please, get your credit card out and make a contribution to me that says, “I am American and I believe that.”

If you don’t believe that, then you don’t know what being an American is really all about. Go read our Constitution and then go ask a minority seeking naturalization why they want to be American.

Please enjoy the Commercial for I am American. Please, I’m working my butt off for you and you could sure help us by making a contribution today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac&feature=plcp


Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Youtube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY



Sunday, November 18, 2012

2012 ELECTION MAY HINGE IN U.S. SUPREME COURT Challenge..




FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:


PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES CHALLENGE MOVES FORWARD AT U.S. SUPREME COURT

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/11/18/presidential-candidates-eligibility-challenge-moves-forward-at-u-s-supreme-court-pb/

(Nov. 18, 2012) — The Post & Email recently spoke with Cody Robert Judy, 2012 presidential candidate and newly-declared 2016 presidential candidate, about a new development in his case at the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II.

Judy claims that Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S Constitution because he was not born to two U.S.-citizen parents and may not have been born in the United States. Numerous overseas newspapers, Obama's own literary agent, and some U.S. journalists have reported that Obama was born in Indonesia or Kenya. In 2007, without explanation, his literary agent changed Obama's biography to say that he was born in Hawaii.

On November 10, Judy received a letter from the U.S. Supreme Court asking for more information in regard to a Petition for Rehearing which he had filed at... (cont.. )



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign would like to thank Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email for the Interview & informative report.