BREAKING: ELECTION 2012 U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN

http://www.scribd.com/doc/113860602/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Affidavit-affirmation-of-Petition-for-Rehearing-timing

Update Nov. 24th 2012: I want to thank the following individuals for their contributions towards upholding our Constitution and encourage others to step up to the plate and help us. Fight! Stand! Deliver! This is the most important and only challenge to the Election 2012 in the United States Supreme Court at this time. It usually takes years. Your support for this United States Supreme Court challenge in the election of 2012 Judy v. Obama 12-5276 is key to upholding our Constitution and the integrity of our Country's election process.

Thank you Phillip Solarz- Michigan for your $10 contribution!Thank you Mary Keen from Maine for your $100 contribution on Thanksgiving Day! Thank you Rachel Smith Utah for your $10 contribution! Thank you Robert Moran Florida for your $10 contribution!Thank you Mark Wilson Georgia for your $10 contribution!Thank you Barbara Pafundi Florida for your $30 contribution! Thank you Robert E Dwyer North Carolina for your $1 contribution! Thank you Deborah Shelton Texas for your $25 dollar contribution!Thank you Christina Danielson Florida for your $20 dollar contribution! Thank you Jim Black-Florida for your $75 contribution! Thank you Larry Radkan- West Virgina for your $5 contribution! Thank you Haskell Bass- Oklahoma for your $100 dollar contribution! Thank you Richard Larson- California for your $5 contribution! Thank you Oscar Savaryn- Maryland for your $25 dollar contribution


BREAKING: ELECTION 2012 U.S. SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN

My love for God is the sweetness in my life and when I saw the new movie Lincoln over Thanksgiving I just wept in understanding what it was like to go against everyone who was saying it can't be done. I know without a shadow of a doubt of God's love for our Country and his direction to me of which I am honored to serve, and by the Constitution you don't have to be a majority to win. If the majority chooses un-constitutional, the Republic's minority can win. ;) www.codyjudy.blogspot.com


No sooner had the ink dried on The Post & Email feature story Sharon Rondeau had done Sunday Nov.18TH entitled “ Presidential Candidate's Eligibility Challenge Moves Forward at U.S. Supreme Court pb WILL THE ELIGIBILITY QUESTION FINALLY BE ANSWERED?”, than double trouble begin brewing in the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Petition For Rehearing begin with an official pro se appeal letter to Chief Justice John Roberts October 6th , just 6 days after the official “Denied” entry was posted on the docket October 1st.

It’s no secret that Cody Robert Judy’s Writ of Certiorari went through an excruciating and exhaustive excoriation by the United States Supreme Court Clerk’s Office in early July denied at least 7 times, but what was amazing is as soon as another Georgia Supreme Court appeal came through on Obama’s eligibility Cody was given a case number.

Call it irony, or luck, or more likely call it “cover” for chucking all the Obama eligibility challenges into a pile marked “dismissed for lack of standing”, but that’s been the going freight charge that hasn't allowed any case to make it passed “GO” in the United States Supreme Court.

Cody said a few months back, “ I could see the writing on the wall. It was just too obvious as to what was happening after being denied so blatantly this summer out of the Court Session and into the Fall Session which was closer to the Election. My biggest question really was ‘has this got to do with what the Justices are actually doing or is justice being manipulated to the Justices by some clerk?’, which would be a huge scandal in the Court.”

With that little bit of prep for the story, here’s what Cody said today.

Today, (Monday -November 19th) a day when I am usually gone out of the office and many times out of town, some changes had taken place which called for my being here and taking care of my son.

We were at McDonalds about Noon for a bite to eat and the impression hit me to call the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk’s office and ask them why my “Petition for Rehearing” had not been placed on the docket yet.

I actually wondered because I've called before if it was too soon to call because packages have to go through a security detail and I knew mine had arrived there on Thursday. They have told me a time or two to give them a week after a package arrives to see it on the docket.

Incidentally, or not, I've actually only managed to get the case Analyst assigned to me one time out of maybe a dozen, and she’s the one who told me that. The rest of the time I've got her answering machine and though I've asked for a call back from her, she has never complied with that request.

So you understand a little bit how surprised I was today when I caved in to the strong impression and called a little earlier, and actually was put through to her personally, and didn't get her answering machine.

I asked her where my Petition for Rehearing was at and she told me she’d sent it back to me and that the letter from the Clerk’s office telling me to submit it within 15 days of their Nov. 7th letter was wrong and that the timing had actually run out for me to file that.

I said, “Wait a minute, I filed a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts you should have on your docket entitled “RECONSIDERATION request” on October 6th, just six days after the official ruling Oct 1st. Six days isn't even close to being the 25 days allowed.

I said, then you guys told me I had to submit a formal motion which I did within 25 days. You received that one and sent it back to me stating it didn't comply with Rule 44 telling me I had to resubmit it properly giving me a time frame to do it in. I obliged you in that. Now you’re telling me my letter dated October 6th isn't the date you’re going by? I told her that information was in the Petition for Rehearing did you read it?

She said, Well we are not suppose to read the documents submitted, we just take care of timing problems if something is late. You submit an affidavit stating what you've told me and and we’ll take another look at it.

I said, how are you going to be able to discern my affidavit when it comes if you don’t read the documents that come in and just send them back? She did this to me before with my Writ of Certiorari and I resubmitted without any changes and was given a case number but the timing was all working for Obama.

I was just livid that I would have to file another document based on her incompetence to simply look at the record, but I took a deep breath and started typing.
We finished up at McDonalds at about 3pm. Stradda had a blast playing with all the kids that long. It was like a revolving door of new friends walking in for him to be excited to meet and play with.

We went over to the printers and got a copy printed. Then, ran to the bank for a Notarization: then, it was back to the printers for 14 copies to be made with the Notary Seal and signatures on it, as well as getting a PDF file made, so we could email to Obama’s attorney and the Secretary of state in Georgia.

Here is what was made. http://www.scribd.com/doc/113860602/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Affidavit-affirmation-of-Petition-for-Rehearing-timing


Then it was about 4pm and I was thinking I wonder wonder wonder..if by chance? Our mail comes about 4:00pm so we headed home with the documents we had made. As I rolled up to our place, sure enough sticking out of the mail box was the package to from the U.S. Supreme court with my returned “Petition for Rehearing” stuffed inside and the letter from the Clerk stating what she’d told me.

Well, we didn’t even turn the car off. I grabbed it and headed for the Post Office and had everything back in the mail to the United States Supreme Court by 4:30 pm.
I can’t believe all the “ifs” involved with this. If I hadn't been watching my son I would have been busy working or out of town and would have never been able to get it back to the Court before the Thanksgiving Holiday.

If I hadn’t have called I could not have had the documents ready to insert them back in the mail the same day I received them and it would have still not been there before the Thanksgiving Holiday if I’d sent them tomorrow.

Its feeling like I made a home-run today. Knocked it clear out of the ballpark and rounded every base. It’s just feeling like this case is not my own and that some divine providence is watching over it for which I am or seem to be a grateful watcher just like you, even though I’m playing a part in it.

We had a little fund raiser last week and raised $31 dollars. My campaign didn't go into debt so I don’t want you to think that every dollar you may contribute is not going directly to this case and this cause. I can’t do this on my own, nor should I have to.

I was thinking this morning if the Court decided to hear this case I’d have to get back to Washington DC and I don’t even have the money to do that. I need you to help me. This is our Country, our Constitution we’re taking a stand for.

Lady at the bank told me it was good to see me today, but she was wishing she hadn't seen me. I said why? She said, because if I hadn't seen you then you might have been in Washington DC doing something about the election.

I told her it’s not over. I’ve got Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court and if he’s proven ineligible its game over for him. She said, “just promise me you’ll do something about Obamacare.” I said, “You got it.”

You know it’s not really a good sign when people in banks are pleading with you.
Well, anyway that’s what happened today and I need your help. I think about businesses who are adding up what Obama care’s going to cost them and either cutting their employees or making them take a cut for it, and its hard for me to understand why every business in America isn’t behind me sending me $100 or $2500.

You know it’s going to cost them that much per employee, so from my perspective their dollars are very wisely spent on my Campaign.

Forget about Mitt Romney right now, lick your wounds, but this is Uncle Sam pointing at you telling you “ I NEED YOU NOW ”

I also got the web site back up which was flickering out by paying for another month. Now I need your help. Please log on and figure out what you can send me that’s not going to break your back, but that you feel is actually saving for you if we win and Obama is proven to be ineligible by the demands of the Constitution for a natural born citizen.

Do it now please, because when the Court decides to hear this case I’ve got to buy airplane tickets and it takes me two days to make a transaction from Paypal to my account and we might not have two days.

I don’t want my next blog to say, “Supreme Court decides to hear the case Judy v. Obama but Judy never showed up because no one believing in the Constitution would help the poor guy out a few bucks and he couldn’t get a plane ticket. So isn’t it funny, Obama actually broke everyone so bad that they couldn’t even take a stand for the Constitution in the United States Supreme Court when the opportunity was presented to them? Guess they’d pinned all their hope and money on Romney and there just wasn’t enough to round 3rd place and bring it home for Conservatives.”

You know I want you to remember this very important message I’ve been trying to get through that big elephant skull so they’d get off their Ass. Now listen, you don’t have to be a majority to win if the majority has chosen something unconstitutional. A minority in this Country can rule if they take a stand for the Constitution, because this is a Republic founded on the United States Constitution as the Supreme law of the land.

The unconstitutional thing the majority has chosen is none other than Obama. Obama is a walking talking violation of the Constitution in the White House. Now please, get your credit card out and make a contribution to me that says, “I am American and I believe that.”

If you don’t believe that, then you don’t know what being an American is really all about. Go read our Constitution and then go ask a minority seeking naturalization why they want to be American.

Please enjoy the Commercial for I am American. Please, I’m working my butt off for you and you could sure help us by making a contribution today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac&feature=plcp


Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Youtube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY

2012 ELECTION MAY HINGE IN U.S. SUPREME COURT Challenge..

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:


PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES CHALLENGE MOVES FORWARD AT U.S. SUPREME COURT

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/11/18/presidential-candidates-eligibility-challenge-moves-forward-at-u-s-supreme-court-pb/

(Nov. 18, 2012) — The Post & Email recently spoke with Cody Robert Judy, 2012 presidential candidate and newly-declared 2016 presidential candidate, about a new development in his case at the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II.

Judy claims that Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S Constitution because he was not born to two U.S.-citizen parents and may not have been born in the United States. Numerous overseas newspapers, Obama's own literary agent, and some U.S. journalists have reported that Obama was born in Indonesia or Kenya. In 2007, without explanation, his literary agent changed Obama's biography to say that he was born in Hawaii.

On November 10, Judy received a letter from the U.S. Supreme Court asking for more information in regard to a Petition for Rehearing which he had filed at... (cont.. )



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign would like to thank Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email for the Interview & informative report.

Update in Atlanta Georgia Superior Court Case on Obama Eligibility Ballot Challenge

UPDATE IN GEORGIA:

From The Post & Email story - Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama
CLAIMS “EXPLOSIVE” INFORMATION
by Sharon Rondeau


Just by way of an update on this action, I received confirmation that the Motion and the Memorandum was received and filed in the Court today!

Thursday, Feb 23, 2012
Mr. Judy,

Today, our office received your Motion to Proceed Pro Se and Supporting Memorandum. The document we received is the original. As I have explained to Mr. Farrar, you must file all pleadings directly with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County (i.e. an original, hard copy) either by mail or in person. The Court (i.e. the Judge’s office) cannot accept pleadings for filing on your behalf. However, on this one occasion since you are located in Utah, we will take this document downstairs and file it for you. In future, please ensure that all filings are sent directly to the Clerk’s Office.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Baum
Staff Attorney to the Honorable Cynthia D. Wright

This was so nice of Ms. Elizabeth Baum and certainly was appreciated!

I am looking forward to Judge Cynthia D. Wrights actions on this case as Lawdragon, a guide to the nation’s best lawyers and judges, recently selected Judge Wright as one of the 500 Leading Judges in America. The Family Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia presented the 2006 Jack P. Turner Award to Judge Wright for her outstanding contributions and achievement in family law in Georgia. In 2000, Judge Wright also received the Joseph T. Tuggle, Jr. Professionalism Award from the Family Law Section of the State Bar Association of Georgia.

As the 9th most populous State in the Union Georgia we certainly have a lot of votes to be concerned about and I certainly extend my sincere plea for your support and assistance with my campaign for President, in travel expenses and media. I would really love to put a few TV & Radio adds out there in GA.



If there was a time for The Birther Movement to unite I hope that it would be now.

Of course everyone who believes the Constitution should be upheld has an interest in how this shakes out. Of course most people want to be part of a winning team, it’s always interesting how much more money a Candidate for President takes in when he wins a Primary or Caucus.

Granted we haven't won much in The Birther Movement as far as Court Decisions, but I want to instill in you the sober truth, 'We haven't been heard yet' on the merits in a Judicial Court. We should all keep in mind that Courts are discouraged from making rulings on the Constitution that are not ripe, or presented, or proper as far as 'standing' is concerned.

These arguments are good and necessary to wade through though excruciatingly painful. I can attest to that as a litigant since 2008 in multiple cases on the eligibility issue that represented months of work, a drain on my pocketbook, all contributing to loss and divorce in my family.

These are all good reasons that explain why people who ‘lose’ in politic court hearings and campaigns for that matter, don’t often head back in. “To hell with it”, is an answer that everyone has to deal with in their own way I suppose.

When I think about it as it concerns our United States Constitution however, I don’t seem to be able to quit. Just thinking about the liberties and freedoms that I will leave to my children, even though they may not appreciate it, just thinking about that opportunity for them spurs me on.

These are indeed hard lessons to realize and you rationalize that with "hope" that the next battle might be won and that it wasn't all in vein. We certainly recall it was after a series of losses and big defeats that George Washington crossed the Delaware River on Christmas 1776 to surprise the Hessian forces at Trenton New Jersey leading to a whole new recruitment of forces because he had won.

Those men who were with Washington before crossing that icy river knew their efforts were the catalyst for the win. Similarly, and now, those who are helping with this effort should know they are the same as those who have gone on in the face of defeat and so I urge you to contribute to this noble cause.

Those who can help please visit my web site and find the contribution page here:

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htmSincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube:CODE4PRES

DOJ Election Trust Demands New Hampshire Revisit Obama on Primary Ballot‏

Dear New Hampshire DOJ Election Law:

Thank you, for your consideration of my letter/complaint. I am a candidate for office in the same party, and the same position as Barack Obama. Thus the argument of partisan politics does not enter into consideration of my complaint.

First let me say, I knew Mrs. Orly Taitz would have the problem of the Law Commission 11-18-2012, 2 pm hearing, saying they did not have jurisdiction over criminal matters when she brought up the alleged Social Security Number fraud and Fraudulent or Forged long form Birth Certificate.

However let me say, cooler thought prevailing, the criminal aspect of the allegations need not be considered to warrant prohibition on the Primary Ballot in the interest of protecting the Voter in the Primary Election from wasting a vote on a constitutionally unqualified candidate.

I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as an "Kenya ,East Africa" Citizen at the time of Obama's birth.






Of course this is in no way exhibited as a "racially prejudice fact", but as a "disqualification fact" that is based on demand of our Constitution's requirements for President, and this is the Supreme Law of the Land. These facts afford a removal from the Primary Ballot with the burden of further deliberation or review upon the candidate Barack Obama.

Obama holds by his own record and release of his Long Form Birth Certificate naturally a dual loyalty of inherited citizenship, which is forbidden by our Constitutions expressed demands for president as a Natural Born Citizen. This is a national security concern of voting citizens.

It does not need to be proven that it is forged or fraudulent. Obama's Released Long form birth certificate appeals to the hard facts as prohibitory for running as a qualified candidate, or holding, the office of President. If the intent of the Ballot Law Commission's review is to prohibit unqualified candidates from the ballot in the interest of the qualifying standards of office demanded by We The People through our Constitution, Obama's release of his long form birth certificate is where the facts come from that disqualifies him, and my witness stands against his qualification.

One interesting note to read regarding the Ballot Law Commission's Review:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/Ballot%20Law%20Commission/PDF%27s/Secretary%20of%20State%20vs.%20eight%20candidates%20on%20primary%20ballot.pdf " The Ballot law commission shall hear and determine disputes arising over whether nomination papers or declarations of candidacy filed with the secretary of state conform with law. The decisions of the ballot commission in such cases shall be final as to questions both of law and fact, and no court shall have jurisdiction to review such decision."

This is a absolute powerfully corrupt statement, as it places the review of decisions out of jurisdiction of the Judicial Branch's Court of law including the United States Supreme Court, while at the same time leaving the "Primary Voter" without an Appeal to very important and pertinent information that includes election law and fact meant to protect the integrity of actual qualified candidates as myself, and more importantly the trust that voters give in the hope they can at the very least participate in Democracy's Beacon of hope for the world, voting in the Primary for an actual qualified candidate.

Facts are hard to deny that are actually given by the Candidate to the Ballot Law Commission. Barack Obama need not agree whether forged or fraudulent facts; for that is not the issue. The issue, we all agree on: Obama has given these set of facts contained in his long form birth certificate, and from this, any decision allowing him on a Primary Ballot is knowingly presenting as a choice an unqualified candidate to Primary voters.

Knowingly presenting an unqualified candidate to Primary voters would be considered a dereliction of duty of the Ballot Law Commission.

You also have a point of entry and trust that needs to be considered by the Legislatures of New Hampshire, and the DOJ of New Hampshire, regarding the integrity of the voting system as an agent to justice, our Constitution, and the Republic for which we stand.

I hope my complaint to the DOJ in New Hampshire won't fall on deaf ears, and they will see the cracks in the side walk that need to be repaired.
Again here are the links that detail my complaint and warrant your immediate attention for the eyes of the Nation are on New Hampshire.

1- http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/18/presidential-candidate-adds-name-to-obama-election-complaint-in-new-hampshire/
2-http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/11/complaint-joinder-ltr-new-hampshire.html
3- http://inagist.com/Drudge_Report/137577430402609152/
4-http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/293101/birther-challenges-obama?CSAuthResp=1321635127:kac5p0ac2a53k27d9iernpe2m5:CSUserId|CSGroupId:approved:C7BFB10B487EEBB060A53F45DE1EA54D&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
5-http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=369241

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

A Dose of Reality- Religion,Gender Discrimination, and Eligibility

To the author known as One Pissed Off Vietnam Veteran in regards to the editorial featured at The Post & Email-

My Time Has Come
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/08/my-time-has-come/

My considered answer entitled:
A Dose of Reality

A Dose of Reality

Dear One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet- First let me say how much I have enjoyed reading many of your articles and how much I respect your position and share your frustration with an unqualified occupant in the White House, that not one major tiered Republican Candidate in the Presidential Race is willing to acknowledge as a walking talking violation of Article 2, Sect 1, clause 5.

Respectfully, I would like to comment upon your stand as a Patriot and to soberly place a few facts before your consideration, which might sting a little. The Lord knows I’ve had a few facts placed before me before that stung a little, so I don’t do this with railing or accusation, but rather meaningfully in a brother to brother way.

Re: Second Paragraph- “.. bad news continues with the cancerous spread of Islam for women, who are forever reduced to second-class citizens. Muslims have a warped world view…”Muslims also spelled Moslem, is an adherent of Islam, a monotheistic, Abrahamic religion based on the Qur'an. As a Presidential Candidate representing your ability to preserve and protect U.S.C. Amendment 1- “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, comes a question. Is your statement a blanket statement against religion in America?

Make no mistake Islam is a religion protected under this clause of the United States Constitution. Women in the United States now still endure the short end of the stick when it comes to wage comparisons in the corporate arena. Recently even Wallmart was taken clear to the U.S. Supreme Court who ultimately dismissed the gender based law suit. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/0620/Supreme-Court-dismisses-women-s-class-action-lawsuit-against-Wal-Mart , and the plaintiffs in the case were not represented as Islamic, nor have I seen your editorial about the ‘warped’ view of the public work sector which so many women in the U.S. face every day. Of course I recently saw a report of a mother in the military charging in a hail fire of bullets overhead to save her fellow U.S. soldiers in harm’s way. For her the privilege of serving has been extended to hostile actions in war where it was not so a few short years ago.

I’m sure the discrimination of women as a second class citizen can be extracted out of the King James Bible by any Christian reading that God took from man a rib and created women second, and they are upset about that. You could say God has a major law suit brewing against him for that action, but the job of the President is to protect our Constitution, and religion is a big part of that. Sure as hell you don’t stick up for Islam’s faith, pretty soon the Government comes out with an order calling all Christians who believe in the Holy Ghost delusional, and like TX-Governor Perry-R implemented in the forced vaccine of 12 year old girls, a vaccine supposedly created to prevent cervical cancer, bypassing his Texas Legislature, the government through an executive order of the President makes a drug company rich with a lucrative anti-Christian ghost pill. How important is it to protect religions as a President and stick to saying that freedom of conscience is of course allowed and extended to the Islamic Religion, however the physical implementation of actions against another human being that violate law shall receive the punishment of the law, and you know as well as I do, we have laws against slavery, against involuntary mutilation, against domestic violence, and murder.

My point is the line that is crossed between becoming a President that violates the protections of the Constitution by advocating specific and general nuisances against any particular religion is pretty clear when a specific religion is mentioned in a demeaning way. Contrary to what you imply, our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and our criminal code applies to people across all religious sects. If it is not applied it is available because America doesn’t fight religious wars. That kinda separates us from the mentality of Taliban and we shouldn’t forget it, and if we do, we indeed have turned traitor rather than advocate of our own Constitution.

Paragraph 6- “That Obama is a felon is without question, and those who disagree need to define the word “crazy”: when the brain refuses to accept facts, such as Obama’s bogus Social Security number.” As a presidential candidate I’m sure you understand U.S.C. Amend. VI. In criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial…. To have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” Again the words Obama is a felon should be replaced as Obama is accused, allegedly, and charged, because it’s not crazy to say Obama’s deeds have not been tried in a court of law, accept by one 10th Amendment Trial the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial of which I was a witness as a presidential candidate in 2008, who had also filed actions on McCain for being foreign born, and Obama for failing the, “to parents who are Citizens” part of the Natural Born Citizen clause. That trial did not involve Obama’s Social Security number however but dealt primarily with his eligibility and harm to the Constitution.

This brings me to the last point I’d like to make regarding what the 2012 Presidential Candidates “want America’s future to look like.” The Post and Email has graciously published 3 articles about my candidacy that is registered in the FEC as “The Cody Robert Judy for President U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign” which features Obama’s identity as a serious Constitutional crisis with my real name attached. As a Presidential Candidate yourself now, we don’t know your name and “One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet’,aka., “OPOVV”, is not your real name or the one that you volunteered for in the United States Military with.

So, your humble reader here, is left wondering wither your actually mocking the efforts of those of us who are serious about our Constitution, or wither we should laugh about your comedic skills as if voting none of the above is a choice we should make, disparaging the choice such as mine that was serious and legitimate?

As a Presidential Candidate who has been in this fight since 2008, as a non-partisan party, suing both McCain and Obama with my own hard earned coin that wasn’t cheap or easily earned, I can tell you as a candidate a few of the questions you will be asked that you must find an answer to; “Where where you in 2008? Why has the qualification question eluded you till now? What legal action did your convictions drive you towards the past 4 years besides exercising your first Amendment rights of free speech? And finally, given the fact that you undoubtedly have read the 3 articles of the Post and Email regarding a legitimate and qualified Presidential Candidate who has a record in Federal Court and has a non partisan record towards making the Qualification Question a Constitutional Issue, and not a partisan or racial issue, why have you not contributed towards that campaign a single dollar? Or if you have, how much did you contribute, or how much time did you spend promoting that if you didn’t have any money to send?

This is a question for every Patriot should ask, and one Sharon Rondeau can affirm with courage that she has spent quite abit of time promoting as a service to our country. Thank you Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email for that courage!

Thank you for your attention to our Constitution
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.uswww.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Could The Birther Debate Explode In The Democrat Party on Obama?

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

What would happen if Cody Robert Judy ran as a Democrat? Its not a stretch as Cody Judy ran for U.S. Senator in the Democrat Party in 2004, before he went on to finish as a write-in Candidate in Utah that year after, "the Democrat Party Heads chose their loser", he says and otherwise has only run as a write-in trumping an independent conservative card. A little background on Cody was covered insightfully by The Post & Email here : “GOOD MEN CANNOT SIT IDLY BY AND DO NOTHING”

and Here: Update:Prospective Candidate for President Wants to Raise Eligibility Issue

This shows Cody Robert Judy is very serious about Obama's Eligibility and the Constitution he says is the key to turning things like the economy around in America.

"Many people haven't given any credit or have forgotten the Constitution created the United States and thus our economy, but it is very plain to see that deficit spending has become a key component to getting elected which has led to a departure of moral constitutional high ground that is sound. Its as if our politicians are willing to sell our future generations back into the same type of bondage that Israel was led out of in Egypt. ", says Mr. Judy, "And you cannot find a 'deliverer" within the candidates thus far in the Republican Party. While that may be dramatic as far as example 14 Trillion has 12 zeros' behind it and that is dramatic and real and is nearing a threshold of war that would make Iraq and Afghanistan look like street fights, and or enslavement of future generations."

In 2008 Cody ran for the POTUS seat as a write-in but mainly to gain 'standing' needed to clear his way through a law suit against first John McCain and then Obama. Cody said he was trying to clean up the conservative house when it came to the Constitution but the Republican National Committee refused to hear the beck-and-call. Cody asserts that nothing has changed within the Republican Party and that not a single major player in the Republican Race is willing to place the principles of the Constitution into action when it comes to Obama's Eligibility, and that cripples 1/3 of the Government through the executive branch. "That's a Big Log to ignore!" says Cody. If they are so willing to ignore Obama's Eligibility what makes anyone think they have any backbone to quit their own deficit spending?

Cody says he suspects more and more that Republicans failed leadership in candidates is connected to a lack of leadership on the Constitution and unfortunately those who rally around the R- candidates do so as more of a popularity beauty contest then a principled constitutional stand. "While the R Candidates have shown some integrity towards the deficit spending in words lately, that's the big whale they want to harpoon with Obama forgetting the Trillion spent in Iraq and Afghanistan on Bush's 2 term watch, like people are stupid, they totally ignore Obama's fraud and forgery. That's acting as an accomplis to the fraud and forgery and is a misprision assault towards citizens and future generations. The real weak spot for Obama is backbone for the Constitution and Republicans refuse to touch it exposing their own weakness; so they are silent supporters with a bet that the American People will forget their own deficit spending for Obama's", says Cody "If the R Candidates are correct we are sunk!"

If Cody Judy runs as a Democrat and takes the fight to Obama in his own Party and happens to win? What principle or Constitutional Bone would be left for Republicans? You've heard of the dog with no bone, well Republicans would be that dog and would certainly have no home! In fact with constitutional champion organizations like the ACLU on the Democrat side, as well as famed JFK who wanted to go back to the gold standard in fiscal integrity, would it be a stretch for them to swing their weight to Cody?

We suspect Obama is much weaker within the Democrat Party now then from without; more then ever with his invasion of Afghanistan and billions of dollars spent bombing Libya. With Obama's health care crumbling over realizing cost, unemployment surging over 9%, and the lack of ability to inspire businesses to spend and hire, he has lost two of his legs to stand on within the Democrat Party itself, and its not unreasonable to see the bust coming over the "gunrunner dog", and "social security fraud" colliding making Obama's Disability Congressional Hearings come even quicker.

Mr. Judy says, "Sometimes when you need to get from A to B, you don't fuss with vehicles, your objective is the priorty: Get from A to B."

Campaign Cody Judy for President 2012