[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!
BREAKING NEWS - 7 Day Count Down! SCOTUS CONFERENCES OBAMA INELIGIBILITY- CONGRESS NEXT
Obama Conference of Ineligibility in U.S. Supreme Court. Government Considers what IF Questions
Just seven (7) days now until the United States Supreme Court considers Obama's Ineligibility in the Office of the President upon the Standard of Qualifications known as 'natural born Citizen' - ie. [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. Obama of course fails this Standard and in such is a walking talking violation of the Constitution and the Standard for the authority that WE THE PEOPLE have demanded for that Office consistently represented on Record of this 5 Year old Blog. A very Quick Cheers to You as we Celebrate your incredible Response to what has been written here.
Of course with an offense of Ineligibility in the Office of the President- comes first the 'allegation', then 'investigation' then trial and then comes the 'conclusion'. For the U.S. Government it was private corporation Judicial Watch who uncovered the enlightening evidence through a FOIA Request that re-opened the Benghazi Investigations that had been closed by Congress. This is a perfect witness of something the Government should have got right the first time but didn't and it taking the public or private enterprise to get to the truth. The Truth came out with a public Citizen source who actually did the leg work forcing Congress to re-open its closed case.
This is brought up as a very modern and media publicized account for example of a Responsible Citizenry and an Irresponsible Government. The same philosophy applies to the INELIGIBILITY ACCOUNTing of Barack Hussein Obama in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for a conference of the Court June 18th, 2015. In the example Cody Robert Judy as a Presidential Candidate, with Standing and damages to his Campaign in 2008 and 2012, directly cited the ineligibility of Obama using the qualifications of the Race for President, outlined by the U.S. Constitution in Art. II. Section I, Clause 5. Congress screwed this one up and its taken an un-elected or public Citizen to bring the action back for Justice. We know its not the first time and it probably won't be the last. Congress actually hasn't had 'standing' to challenge the issue either and therefore at times and circumstances like this relies heavily on the Public and the Courts for Justice. It should be noted I as a Candidate for President do meet the natural born Citizen qualification to be President as I was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho to Citizen parents.
The Constitution provides the exact language that a President can be elected and still fail to qualify in Amendment XX. Certification of Congress does not make someone who is ineligible and or unqualified, eligible by the Standards of the Constitution. Of course the Legislative Branch doesn't even have the responsibility of interpreting the Constitution. Their responsibility is 'making the law' and the Judicial Branch's responsibility comes into interpreting the law, accept under the explicit TRIAL conditions in the U.S. Senate which even than the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court heads. Those parameters make a challenge to the Standards of the Office of the President proper in the U.S. Supreme Court brought to them by a Candidate for President, even though un-elected, much the same as Judicial Watch ham-stringed the Investigation of Congress with new information that had to be considered in Congress's oversight.
Of course in 2008 no one knew who Barack Obama was. There was no long form birth Certificate for a law enforcement investigation to look at and until a person actually becomes a Parties Nominee a Challenge to their ineligibility is considered premature by the Courts. That makes for a waiting game that certainly becomes perilous in the time constraints and expectations of the Judicial Courts unless a Plaintiff happened to get lucky in the lower Courts. Luck has not been favorable upon those decried "Birthers" by the Main Stream Media while the lower Court Judges who are subjected to elections themselves worry like politicians propped up in front of the boob-tube.
It is only the United States Supreme Court Justices who have been given lifetime tenure. That was given to them by the People in the Constitution as a guardian of our Rights without restraint of pandering to popularity. Burning the United States Flag in protest of corruption within the Government was upheld by the Court as an act of free speech some 26 years ago this month, just as coloring the Prophet of the Islamic Faith is protected under freedom of speech whilst it is in direct conflict with that religions teachings for its congregation. Subjecting a whole population to a religious tenant by force is a tyrannical Theocracy and that is not how the United States of America was at least designed to operate in its defense and respect of more than one, multi or diverse religions. This was extrapolated with Fox New's Megyn Kelly and a guest of hers May 8th,FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AMERICA UNDER ATTACK and her guest Eugene Volokh.
The principle is not foreign to Christians found in the Bible's book of Isaiah 29:21 and even in the LDS B.O.M 2nd Nephi 27:32 invoking the Principle of freedom of speech. The designs that a Religion would kill or enslave a population to prison for free speech should be maintained as 'foreign' in the United States. Our Criminal Code and Civil Rights are designated protections from being beheaded, and imprisoned. This also requires a vigilant population who is educated/informed of where the lines are drawn from facts to fiction and a Justice System allowed the time to see the matter out in order. Where speedy trials are denied however, there is also the danger of 'instant justice' being seen as a positive incentive for the population as a discouragement and apathy sets in. The circumstances consistently show the wise understanding our Constitution provides.
SECURING THE PROTECTIONS OF THE VOTE
The U.S. Supreme Court Justices are given to make decisions that may not be fully supported by a bullying population when it comes to protecting individual rights as it becomes necessary to secure those for the minorities. The sacred turf of freedom and liberty seen in protecting the 'individuals vote' can not be over stated as fundamental to the foundation. The Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case of course pitches three strikes in this regard declaring Obama ineligible and the votes cast for him made in contempt of honoring every persons right to at least vote for a qualified candidate.
To secure that right, an allegation of fraudulent identity has been brought to the Court for its consideration as well as the allegation of Obama's failure to qualify as a 'natural born Citizen' by not having two Parents who are U.S. Citizens. The doctrine that foreign influence in the history of a person for two generations be kept strictly American is found in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. One of the misconceptions is seen in the facts that 'natural born Citizenship' can be walked into or earned by immigrants who come here legally stay and have children eligible to be President; but also can be walked out of by for instance a natural born Citizen incorporating foreign influence by marriage and moving out of the United States to start a family in a foreign land. The guarantees that the children of mixed foreign affluent parents as well as foreign birth maintain the same rights to the Presidency is a false narrative to the protections upon which that qualification was established in the first place.
Its not as if America doesn't offer its immigrants the ability to govern up to the U.S. Senate as "Citizen" is the distinction made for that high office, but the United States holds a reward for those generations who stay and propagate families in America in the reservation of the Office of the President, regardless of race, gender,or religion. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is a legal action against Obama and his enablers personally as well as those in office legally within the DNC. The action depicts the damages resulting from the fraudulent actions of identity upon myself as a Candidate, but the Court will consider it a fraudulent action upon Voters much more in their considerations than the mere damages to my person.
COMMENT Question to CRJ:
Good luck with your endeavor. I truly pray he is exposed. I worry though. If he is impeached, will this actually mean that he will have to first be "considered" as being a president in order to "be" impeached? Furthermore, will his executive actions be legitimized if not overturned by the courts?
Cody Robert JudyJune 11, 2015 at 6:53 AM
@Anonymous 6-11-2015 @2:55AM Up late burning the after midnight oil I see. Good Questions. There can be different types of "Impeachment" under the Guidelines of "Impeachment" proceedings. For instance a "Disability Impeachment Trial" and a "Crimes and Misdemeanors Impeachment Trial" may be brought against one who is elected but not qualified (Amendment XX) as well as an Offense while in Office that would be considered illegal.
It is with this understanding that I have used the words together and not meant for an "Impeachment Trial on the Grounds of a Disability to Execute the Duties of the Office" to be the same as Impeachment of a Qualified President.
The Senate really has the Duty to Remove anyone from the Office of the President who is there illegally for any reason and the word impeachment is used lightly and can also be used for a Usurper-President which is one who was elected but failed to Qualify. For definitive purposes impeachment really means the Extrication of Unlawfulness in the Office of the President and being unqualified but stating you were Qualified is a Crime against the Oath of Office, as well through the Falsification of Identification or I.D. Fraud.
Whether offense has come from not qualifying or crimes while in office is really a simple time question that does not prohibit the use of the word we use referring to "Impeachment of a President" or Extracting a Usurper.
Second Question - Will his Executive Actions be legitimized if not overturned by the Courts?
Upon the Grounds of finding Obama ineligible for the duties of the Office of the President as a disability, of course. Any action with the very use of his signature upon it becomes "Moot". We would not follow the orders of a crazy person in Office and Obama in the Office of the President is technically a perfect condition of a"disability" in the Office of the President.
Exposing his actions does represent a kind of conundrum of sorts 'Insanity' against the Constitution. Obama represents an Unconstitutional Insanity. He is a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution. His executive orders are Orders of Insanity. He has imported an army of illegal aliens and charged tax payers for his illegal standing army. He has orchestrated a mandate of force on Americans in Health Care that encroaches upon freedom and liberty. The damages are heaped up like dung every minute he is in that office.
What I think will happen is the Government will have to initiate a FREEZE of Federal Action as well as Personal until a Orderly Transition can be made. I don't think Biden should be a default President based on his being chosen by an Unconstitutional Insanity. All of the Office below the Office of the President are required to follow the Orders of the President, so what I would suggest according to guidelines of the U.S. Constitution is the U.S. Senate appoint a President Pro Tempore until the matter be resolved by Election.
Former President George W. Bush is the last one to hold the Office legally his experience with the Office as a former President would be an insertion of stability in the interim.
Thanks for the Question]
[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!
HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
