STONES : Barack Hussein Obama

Showing posts with label Barack Hussein Obama. Show all posts

Friday, April 6, 2018

America May Be Called to Serve & Cleaned Up -CHINA - RUSSIA

America May Be Called to Serve

& Cleaned Up

-CHINA - RUSSIA -

CHINA ACCUSES USA OF ARROGANCE in THE FACE OF EMPIRIORILISM- Emperor Tyranny , RACISM, and RELIGIOUS RESTRICTION.

Has God witnessed the Prayers of The People of Persecution with the compulsion of China to War? Will America set the People of China free? It may be a calling which advocates the greatest American Challenge in U.S. History!

[China will not hesitate with 'major response' to new tariffs: Ministry of Commerce

"We will immediately fight back with a major response," a Ministry of Commerce representative said during a Chinese-language briefing with reporters Friday in Beijing. "We have no other choice."

"We feel America is very arrogant. They have taken a wrong action. The result is that they will hurt themselves. If they release the list of $100 billion tariffs, China is prepared. And will not hesitate," he added.

"We have prepared with a bottom line mindset and have planned detailed action. We won't start a war, but if someone does, we will definitely fight back," the representative said." ]

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/06/china-will-not-hesitate-with-major-response-to-new-tariffs-ministry-of-commerce.html

China's Trade Nuke
Bush-Clinton Sell Out of Rare Metals

http://theweek.com/articles/765276/how-china-win-trade-war-1-moveChina has a nuclear option.

[I'm referring to rare earth metals.

These are elements like dysprosium, neodymium, gadolinium, and ytterbium. They aren't actually rare, but they do play crucial roles in everything from smart phones to electric car motors, hard drives, wind turbines, military radar, smart bombs, laser guidance, and more. They're also quite difficult to mine and process.

And it certainly wasn't prudent to allow China to corner the rare earth metal market. But ultimately China is just a hard-nosed global player, pursuing what it sees as its national interest.

But regardless, blaming the hippies for America's rare earth metal woes is doubling down on a bad strategy. Blinkered enthusiasm for free market solutions is how we lost domestic operations in the first place. Furthermore, China itself solved the environmental problem by just not caring, and created dystopian wastelands in the process.]

We may see with China's 6 Billion Dollar yearly Trade Surplus a resistance to level the field. It's been bullying for decades, and a bully rarely recognizes their own actions if such because if the positive incentives of the past rewards.

America's Choice of President Trump may have been the best choice for knowing what was happening matched with the courage and will to stop it by standing up to it.

There may indeed be a much bigger force at work than anyone realizes. God's hand in answering the People if China's Prayers as a Persecuted People in the Restrictions of Religeius worship.

As Christains cannot deny, the hand of God often opens his arms to a fold where many of his children are denied that they might receive the inheritance of Jesus Christ's Redemption and partake in the marvelous wonderful love He has Prepared for them!

Where Dictators and Policies of Tyranny and Racism exist the history of God has performed mighty works as the world noticed at just the right Time, Israel was suddenly and remarkably restored as a Nation!

As Christain's we cannot give in or be silent in the dark. We are taught to let our light shine in the darkness and the darkness comprehended it not.

We are urged to put on the armor of God and fight the good fight as free men. When silence is slavery and fighting and dying as free men entitle us to the Kingdom of God.

we must take up the burdens of our Lord as happy and joyfully as we know Freedom and Liberty is the Cause of our God in his Son Jesus Christ who is One with the Father even as Moses went after the Israelites to free them from Egypt as "Property" or Slaves of the State.

That a Choice may be brought to our Brothers and Sisters who are a Persecuted People the Lord God intends to set Free with Liberty and Individual Redemption!

So, is it any wonder these forces of Dictatorship are wailing, waxing, stomping and enraged as the Devil? No... no surprise at all. We may rest in the witness of God being laid out before them that they may say, "Your God is God!", and perhaps the pains of hell might release the grip of destruction upon them.

RUSSIA, IRAN, TURKEY SYRIA spark Alliance?
Is the Bear having Turkey for Syria? The surprise comes from Turkey listed on the NATO Alliance ( North American and European Allies) formed April 4th, 1949 after WWII.

[President Putin, President Erdogan and President Rouhani vowed to work together to create a 'lasting ceasefire', build a hospital for wounded civilians in Eastern Ghouta and allow refugees to return home.The leaders of Russia, Turkey and Iran met in Ankara for talks yesterday as they cemented their unlikely alliance over (Asadd's) Syria in a challenge to US and western influence in the region.]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5577929/Putin-cements-alliance-Iran-Turkey-Syria-summit-Ankara.html

NATO Wiki

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

Daniels Dream

And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: ...
Daniel 7:1-8

ON THE DOMESTIC FRONT

Things may be looking up as April Showers are forecast.

Still, the week of April 14-21 Has a history for the US of being one of the most painful months including but certainly noy limiyed to the Titanic Sinking, Bay Of Pigs, Assasination of President Lincoln, Waco, Columbine, Missippi Overflowing, Virginia Tech and the Federal Building Bombing in Oklahoma.

#Qanon

24 foreigners were just indicted by Mueller for their part in the Russian Collusion. The execution of such includes a freeze on foreign and domestic transactions of presumably personal and business banking accounts.

We may wonder if the Domestic Treason investigations may yield the same Hook.

Manafort and Page have now been history researched and alleged as [Plants] to the Trump Campaign.

And Utah Attorney Huber has been working since November with the authority of A.G. Jeff Sessions embarked on the discoveries for Uranium One and possible collusion with the Democrats to under mine the US National Security especially focused on the Clinton Campaign and her usurpation of the Office of Secretary of State alleged with a personal server used in context for a pay-to-play foreign favor private ambassy with Obama's Permission and use of it.

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Case Highlights a True American Champion - ACTION not just WORDS

FEATURED EDITORIAL: BIRTHER REPORT and THE POST & EMAIL
Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Case Highlights a True American Champion - ACTION not just WORDS

As we head into the final stretch of the Road before the June 18th Conference at the United States Supreme Court this Thursday, I would like to take the time to thank you for the social support, nice comments, and prayers that are being offered on the behalf of this Campaign and our Record to preserve, protect, and defend you in the Civil Courts of Law. I ask very humbly for your most sincere prayers Thursday and that they include the Justices of the United States Supreme Court. SCOTUS NEWS- Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Thinking it was better to be given June 18th Conference 177 Cases than the 202 cases scheduled for Conference June 25. My case listed on June 18th, about 111th on the list. https://certpool.com/conferences/2015-06-18 That's a lot of cases to go through in one day. You can see what a huge task that is for the Justices and their assistance.

The biggest reason of course that Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has been filed is out of a National Security concern. Many people think its about 'hate', including much of the Main Stream Media. Its just the opposite, its about Love and protecting you, the Americans, when no other politician would. They have all forsaken you, not one Candidate for President in the United States has taken a bi-partisan stand against those who are illegal and seek the Presidency in an illegal usurpation you know.

They all have succumb to Party over Principle, and Power over the People instead of in service of the People. It may be the most difficult thing to explain to you and have you understand if you don't already get it. There is no doubt in my mind that as history unfolds, you will gain an understanding of exactly how TRUE these words are. Many see the threat of radical Jihadist as much more than the JV Team that Obama called them. When you understand the implications of our military funding and training the Jihadist Veracity (JV Team), over the last few years, you understand the implications of our national security and its then impossible not to recognize the 'natural born Citizen' clause which Obama is in violation of within our Constitution's Borders. Does Pam Geller support the only Candidate for President willing to stand up on a bi-partisan platform against those who are wanting to subvert it? I don't think she does.

Pam is either to pre-occupied with coloring pictures,or she doesn't have a brain in her head not to come out and support a Candidate willing to pull the line on Obama's hamstring of ineligibility to stop funding on an Islamic Caliphate. Its her birthday today. I hate to be too hard on her, but she's got a lot of headlines and without support in the right direction motives get called into question very easily. Its the nature of political stunts like she's pulling. Of course she can color pictures we all know that its a First Amendment Right that has the full protections of the United States Constitution, but what is the United States Constitution without anyone 'preserving', 'protecting', and 'defending' it? It amounts to words on a piece of paper without enforcement.

In fact, not supporting me for President in her actions is like admitting you really don't want to stop radical jihadist and you hope to continue their funding,territory incursion, be-headings, and kidnapping and general mayhem in the effort to spread their terror upon Americans through U.S. Grants and Funding. These proxy take-overs were just means to get our military arsenal into the hands of radical jihadist. That's no longer conspiracy, even to the Main Stream Press. These guys were not rich enough to buy bee-bee guns and now over the last six years they have some of the most sophisticated weapons in the world in their possession? How did that happen on Obama's watch?

If you haven't asked yourself how the radical jihadist are getting their funding for the weapons cache's and military hardware, you just need to take a look at what we are doing in Syria arming 'rebels', what we did in Libya arming 'rebels', what we did in Iraq arming 'rebels'. We have a Billion Dollars involved in training Syrians right now Democrats are just starting to question. I've written numerous post on this and I encourage people if they have a subject wanting clarifications to simply type in the words on the search bar of my Blog. That will bring up post I have addressed on the issues.
AMERICAN MEDIA GOT IT WRONG

[Image Credit Free Republic]
Let's see what a Billion Dollars would get us? That gives everyone in the United States basically a Happy Meal at McDonalds; who by the way just hired Obama's Former Press Secretary Robert Gibbs as a spokesmen. Remember Robert Gibbs told the Truth to the Media, and said Obama was a Citizen of the United States of America. They were either so uneducated on the Constitution or they sought funding for radical jihadist themselves buying cover for Obama. "Citizen" isn't the qualification for the Office of the President. Its the qualification for the Office of a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Representative. The President's Office requires a 'natural born Citizen' - [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. Here is the 'play on words' Gibbs gave the Press in admitting Obama is a Citizen of the U.S. in speaking about the Office of the President's qualifications, he admits candidly that Obama is not qualified because he doesn't use the Constitution's Qualifications of 'natural born Citizen'. Again, being 'born' in the U.S. and being 'naturalized' by the birth, like an anchor baby is or under the same circumstances as U.S. Senator Marco Rubio does not qualify you for the Office of the President. Neither does having one American Parent like Cruz or Obama.

Robert Gibbs admitted Obama is ONLY A CITIZEN, not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS5Yo7OVePM

Many people who are 'so-called conservatives' are now questioning that just because Obama has been in Office for 6 years he should be allowed to finish his second term. No doubt these folks in many instances are supporters of Rubio, Cruz, Jindal, as well as Obama in that position. They no longer see a threat of opening the door to radical jihadist so they can run rampant in the streets of America beheading people and putting it up on YouTube. There is one thing Communist have in common with radical Islamic jihadist and that is a appetite for territory. Their territory is one consumed by threats of death and actual death that makes the threats of death much more effective.

It has not been a directive of the United States of America to 'take over' other Countries reasonably. What city in Iraq has become a United State in our Union? So if we were doubled over and Iraq didn't have any Weapons of Mass Destruction and even Jeb Bush now says he would not have gone into Iraq, how does it become our responsibility to take back the cities falling to the radical jihadist? Don't forget most of those Countries are Muslim based for thousands of years. Israel is our ally and wiping them off the face of the map definitely will come at a high price and will not be acceptable. If a population adopts that stand they do so without regard to their own families.

So, now when you see the Main Stream Media making fun of Birthers,or anyone for that matter, and not covering the United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 with a single headline or kind word, to at the very least inform their constituency and loyal supporters, you understand what they are really doing is compromising your national security to the point of funding those who won't hesitate cutting the arms and heads off your children. Enjoy that thought during your BBQ's.

Do you think that's funny?! I don't and my ACTION in Court's are a Record that I don't think its a joke. The other politicians running for President? Well, they think its a joke. We'll see how they feel about it when well funded and trained jihadist start popping up in their Malls and Schools and all Americans have to start carrying weapons to feel safe in their streets again.

Folks, that's what Civil Courts are for and why you should be supporting the Civil Arguments in Court now. If we lose those, there is nothing left but barbarity. I for one don't think appeasing a couple of politicians with big egoes is worth that. That's why I have come out against any Candidate for President whose not a 'natural born Citizen'- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

That's why this question is so fundamentally important to ask now. When it comes to your families protections who are you supporting?
Cody Robert Judy The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Saturday, June 13, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!

FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post&Email
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!

It is probably the most [a]cidic and [o]dd circumstances used as tactics upon the United States Supreme Court ever devised by the Respondents, to completely fail to respond, but that is what is being done by Barack Hussein Obama in the highly controversial case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court just six days from now. What remains to be seen is if the 'Triple Bogie' for Obama is seen as Par for the U.S. Supreme Court, and that Par is good enough.

OBAMA HAS FAILED ALL OF THE 'SHOULDs' that LEGAL EXPERTS AGREE UPON

The Rules are verily simple that after a Cert is filed a response is due 30 days afterwards. A brief
in opposition, sometimes colloquially referred to as a “cert opp,” must be filed within 30 days. Sup. Ct. R. 15.2.,and Obama failed to do so hooking his T shot far to the left and landing in another fairway entirely.

The rules do not require a respondent to file a brief in opposition or other response to a cert petition unless the Court otherwise directs. See Sup. Ct. R. 15.1 (“A brief in opposition to a petition for a writ of certiorari may be filed by the respondent in any case, but is not mandatory except in a capital case… or when ordered by the Court.”).

If a respondent decides to forgo its right to file a brief in opposition, the Court’s waiver form, which also serves as an entry of appearance for the respondent’s counsel of record, should be submitted within the time allowed for filing a brief in opposition. Although filing a waiver is not mandatory, a respondent who does not plan to submit a
cert opp should file the waiver form, which is available on the Court’s website. See Waiver, Supreme Court of the United States, http://www.supremecourt.gov/casehand/waiver.pdf This is Obama's second shot on a Par 5 that lands him in the sand trap.

While filing a Waiver is not Mandatory even that does require a signature and the Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 does not have one. This is the ball hit out of the sand trap hitting the opposing wall of the sand trap and rolling back to the feet of Obama now three strokes behind and headed for that triple bogie.

HOW TO APPOSE A CERT POSITION
[The alternative—waiting to see whether, based on review of the petition and any supporting amicus briefs, one or more
Justices are interested enough to require a response—may place a respondent at a disadvantage. See id. at 256.

By opposing a petition at the outset, a respondent eliminates the risk that one or more members of the Court may form a subjective opinion leaning toward granting certiorari before considering the respondent’s point of view. Chief Justice Rehnquist once said that:
“[w]hether or not to vote to grant certiorari strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment.” William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court, How It Was, How It Is, 265 (1987). It is clearly better to have an early influence on that decision. Needless to say, most lawyers would prefer to avoid having to advise their client that the Supreme Court has just agreed to hear a case after you voluntarily waived the right to file a brief in opposition to the cert petition.]

The Court normally will not grant review without first issuing a “CFR,” a for “call for response,” which the Clerk will issue upon the request of even a single Justice. See David C. Thompson & Melanie F. Wachtell, An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General, Geo. Mason. L. Rev. 237, 242, 247–48, Vol. 16:2 (2009).

HISTORY OF OBAMA FAILING COURT DIRECTIVE

The history of the Court not only giving Obama latitude most pro se litigants are not afforded is legendary. In fact as the Petitioner Noticed to the U.S. Supreme Court in a highly unusual Motion for DEFAULT JUDGEMENT UPON RESPONDENT FOR FAILING TO RESPOND TO THE COURTS ORDER OF A MAY 20TH RESPONSE, the Petitioner hailed Obama's as being coddled by the Courts to the point of injustice.

While in the process of exhausting State Remedies Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party was challenging Obama's ineligibility at the first T which was an executive court ballot challenge in 2012. This was not even in the Judicial Branch's authority as yet but was an executive branch court. The Judge in the case, Judge Malihi ORDERED, Obama to make an appearance or respond by Counsel and Obama's attorney instead high-tailed it to the Secretary of State in Georgia stating they would do no such thing. The Secretary of State told Obama if he didn't respond he did so at his own peril. Accordingly, Obama set precedent that if charged the best defense was just to not show up to Court. Both he and his lawyer failed to show up for court in violation of a subpoena to do so. At the hearing Obama sat mulling over the defense contracts that had just been arranged with the State of Georgia to widen the ports and build defense equipment. Not surprising, Malihi made a turn about and not only personally excused Obama but slammed the Petitioners witnesses and evidence to the wall.

Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate appealed the decision into the Judicial Courts of Georgia clear to the Georgia Supreme Court, which obviously still had "Georgia's best interest' rather then the Country's best interest at stake. This was appealed then to the U.S. Supreme Court which also failed to hear the Case in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The circumstance was recently revisited in Malihi's Court but had a dramatically different outcome as the defense, a candidate for office was ordered 'off the ballot' and the Secretary of State in Georgia complied with the Judges ruling.

From the Petitioner Candidate for President 2016 we heard today, " Normally, the Court does require a Response 30 days after the Petition for Cert is filed. Obama's due date for that was May 20th, 2015, and here it is June 12,2015 and still we have not a legitimate and certified response. There is a Waiver filed on the docket of the Court, but the Justices have not seen that is not recognized and is invalid because it doesn't even have a signature on it. Virtually anyone could have filed that including Russian President Vladimir Putin. There is absolutely no way to discern who that waiver is from. None, so it is as if the Government and Obama, both served this petition independently, have neither made a response. This is highly unusual and odd."

"Defaults are generally a lower Court proceeding and that happens when a Respondent fails to respond after being served. This actually happened in my lower Court Case but the lower Court refused just like Judge Malihi in Georgia to recognize service and decided after six months of litigation to dismiss the case. Again, very odd and unusual and we of course appealed.

"First we went to the Denver based 10th Circuit Court and they refused us twice. This is not unusual with a highly political case they think really should be reserved for the U.S. Supreme Court. There are many scholarly opinions now urging the Court to hear this kind of a case which has two Presidential Candidates at the head, one insisting the other is not qualified. It is a very difficult case to procure judicially and is like the ark of the covenant before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Normally, we would see a lot of headlines on this kind of a case, but it's seems like the Media has jumped in the tank on this one. On this Blog posted May 22nd Obama's waiver showed up on the Court Docket. In that post three cases were cited as evidence that just because a 'Waiver' is filed, doesn't mean the Court is necessarily not going to hear the case. The three cases were cited showing 'Waivers' filed and Cert Granted. A "formal response" was also requested by the Court either the day it was posted for Conference or about five days after the Conference was set.

"More than five days now have elapsed on this Case since it was set for Conference. This is realistically bad news. What we would call 'Dead-Filed', with no Amicus Curiae's being filed on either side of the issue. None have been filed for Obama and none have been filed to date for myself, the Petitioner in the case, although any and all were formally invited by me on the Docket Report entry number two (2)- "Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from petitioner.".

"Of course I had hoped America and those opposed to Obama would be on board in wanting to see Justice take place and Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Report holding that Obama's identifications in selective service registration and long form birth certificates are forged be heard in an friendly Amicus Curiae brief to the Court. It is stunning to see that there are no Citizens, or Groups of Citizens in any organization who have filed any thing especially given the wide publicity this Case has seen in shattering circulation of well over 30,000 views the last month.

"The greatest Response from those who you would think able and willing has been something a long the lines of this COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY we featured today in fact. i.e., [Pictured Comment]

It just is a FACT that when a case does have a "Amicus Curiae" or Friend of the Court Brief filed on behalf of one side or the other, that it does place the Case in a higher priority for the Court to hear.

" What can I say, I'm deeply disappointed a few thousand dollars couldn't have been pooled together for a group of concerned Citizens to get one filed. Its as if the People want Justice, but want it free also. The price of Justice while reprehensible to think of in a bribe, is no less important as having a price to defend. Indeed, can anyone deny this in the blood that has come at the price of establishing the United States of America? What price is that? Well, blood comes much more expensively than does the paper money and coins in our pockets, but even that was needed to supply the Army with rifles and bullets and cannons and pay for the soldiers willing to establish and hence defend the Nation.

"Pointing out to the Court not a single Amicus Curiae or Friend of the Court Brief was filed on behalf of Obama, defending his eligibility as well as Ted Cruz's, Marco Rubio's, and Bobby Jindals who are now Presidential Candidates for 2016 is a recognizable fact, but one that might be along the lines of allowing the Court an ease of sweeping the dirt under the table and no one noticing.

As a last ditch effort to show the Court that Obama is no friend or gentlemen to the decorum and process of the Court, I have indeed filed today what is termed a " MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ORDER OF THE COURT FOR RESPONSE MAY 20TH 2015 "

Judy v. Obama Judgement for A Default U.S. Supreme Court

"of course I don't know what else can be done that hasn't been done from my person. I mean, obviously, the Waiver is unsigned, obviously even the Court's own provided Waiver requires a signature. Both the Government and Barack Obama have failed the directive of the Court and it is up to the Court to decide what to do next.

"The Conference of the Court for the Case will indeed be held June 18th,2015 just six days away now and I have outlined for the Court in very simple terms that the Respondent's were served at every turn from the beginning. Now there is one principle that defines for us the Courts ability to do exactly what I am asking the Justices to consider and that though unusual REQUEST for a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER.

CAN THE U.S. Supreme Court issue a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER, when it is an Appeal from a Lower Court?

"The term that makes such a thing possible is called a TRIAL De Novo Review. As fortune would have it, I requested this in my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Under de novo review, the appellate court acts as if it were considering the question(s) for the first time, affording no deference to the decision(s) below. Legal decisions of a lower court on questions of law are reviewed using this standard. This is sometimes also called the "legal error" standard. It allows the appeals court to substitute its own judgment about whether the lower court correctly applied the law.
A new trial in which all issues are reviewed as if for the first time is called a trial de novo.

"Under the Trial de novo review, the U.S. Supreme Court can look upon the Case as if it has original case jurisdiction. This would be as if none of the District Court or the Circuit Courts decisions existed or had ever seen the case. Obama and the Government were served the Case as if they had not been served, and it was to a great deal of trouble that I did this, but it might well have been worth the effort now.

"If the U.S. Supreme Court is an Original Court set under the standards of a new Trial, then DEFAULT for a Respondent and not showing up, and not answering, and not following the decorum or edicts of the Court can be seen as meritorous reasons for DEFAULT JUDGMENTS. These could include awarding me with the sum total of what was asked for in the law suit which would be $140,000,000.00 U.S. Dollars split up between the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporations. Now if the Court did that do you suppose we would see that deer-in-the-headlights stare from the likes of the DNC and Obama?

"Of course we won't know what comes out of the Conference until after the Conference, but these are now possibilities that must be considered legally binding upon the Respondent(s) and acutely within the borders of the United States Supreme Court powers."

[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Thursday, June 11, 2015

BREAKING NEWS - 7 Day Count Down! SCOTUS CONFERENCES OBAMA INELIGIBILITY- CONGRESS NEXT

[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

BREAKING NEWS - 7 Day Count Down! SCOTUS CONFERENCES OBAMA INELIGIBILITY- CONGRESS NEXT
Obama Conference of Ineligibility in U.S. Supreme Court. Government Considers what IF Questions

Just seven (7) days now until the United States Supreme Court considers Obama's Ineligibility in the Office of the President upon the Standard of Qualifications known as 'natural born Citizen' - ie. [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. Obama of course fails this Standard and in such is a walking talking violation of the Constitution and the Standard for the authority that WE THE PEOPLE have demanded for that Office consistently represented on Record of this 5 Year old Blog. A very Quick Cheers to You as we Celebrate your incredible Response to what has been written here.

Of course with an offense of Ineligibility in the Office of the President- comes first the 'allegation', then 'investigation' then trial and then comes the 'conclusion'. For the U.S. Government it was private corporation Judicial Watch who uncovered the enlightening evidence through a FOIA Request that re-opened the Benghazi Investigations that had been closed by Congress. This is a perfect witness of something the Government should have got right the first time but didn't and it taking the public or private enterprise to get to the truth. The Truth came out with a public Citizen source who actually did the leg work forcing Congress to re-open its closed case.

This is brought up as a very modern and media publicized account for example of a Responsible Citizenry and an Irresponsible Government. The same philosophy applies to the INELIGIBILITY ACCOUNTing of Barack Hussein Obama in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for a conference of the Court June 18th, 2015. In the example Cody Robert Judy as a Presidential Candidate, with Standing and damages to his Campaign in 2008 and 2012, directly cited the ineligibility of Obama using the qualifications of the Race for President, outlined by the U.S. Constitution in Art. II. Section I, Clause 5. Congress screwed this one up and its taken an un-elected or public Citizen to bring the action back for Justice. We know its not the first time and it probably won't be the last. Congress actually hasn't had 'standing' to challenge the issue either and therefore at times and circumstances like this relies heavily on the Public and the Courts for Justice. It should be noted I as a Candidate for President do meet the natural born Citizen qualification to be President as I was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho to Citizen parents.

The Constitution provides the exact language that a President can be elected and still fail to qualify in Amendment XX. Certification of Congress does not make someone who is ineligible and or unqualified, eligible by the Standards of the Constitution. Of course the Legislative Branch doesn't even have the responsibility of interpreting the Constitution. Their responsibility is 'making the law' and the Judicial Branch's responsibility comes into interpreting the law, accept under the explicit TRIAL conditions in the U.S. Senate which even than the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court heads. Those parameters make a challenge to the Standards of the Office of the President proper in the U.S. Supreme Court brought to them by a Candidate for President, even though un-elected, much the same as Judicial Watch ham-stringed the Investigation of Congress with new information that had to be considered in Congress's oversight.

Of course in 2008 no one knew who Barack Obama was. There was no long form birth Certificate for a law enforcement investigation to look at and until a person actually becomes a Parties Nominee a Challenge to their ineligibility is considered premature by the Courts. That makes for a waiting game that certainly becomes perilous in the time constraints and expectations of the Judicial Courts unless a Plaintiff happened to get lucky in the lower Courts. Luck has not been favorable upon those decried "Birthers" by the Main Stream Media while the lower Court Judges who are subjected to elections themselves worry like politicians propped up in front of the boob-tube.

It is only the United States Supreme Court Justices who have been given lifetime tenure. That was given to them by the People in the Constitution as a guardian of our Rights without restraint of pandering to popularity. Burning the United States Flag in protest of corruption within the Government was upheld by the Court as an act of free speech some 26 years ago this month, just as coloring the Prophet of the Islamic Faith is protected under freedom of speech whilst it is in direct conflict with that religions teachings for its congregation. Subjecting a whole population to a religious tenant by force is a tyrannical Theocracy and that is not how the United States of America was at least designed to operate in its defense and respect of more than one, multi or diverse religions. This was extrapolated with Fox New's Megyn Kelly and a guest of hers May 8th,FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AMERICA UNDER ATTACK and her guest Eugene Volokh.

The principle is not foreign to Christians found in the Bible's book of Isaiah 29:21 and even in the LDS B.O.M 2nd Nephi 27:32 invoking the Principle of freedom of speech. The designs that a Religion would kill or enslave a population to prison for free speech should be maintained as 'foreign' in the United States. Our Criminal Code and Civil Rights are designated protections from being beheaded, and imprisoned. This also requires a vigilant population who is educated/informed of where the lines are drawn from facts to fiction and a Justice System allowed the time to see the matter out in order. Where speedy trials are denied however, there is also the danger of 'instant justice' being seen as a positive incentive for the population as a discouragement and apathy sets in. The circumstances consistently show the wise understanding our Constitution provides.

SECURING THE PROTECTIONS OF THE VOTE

The U.S. Supreme Court Justices are given to make decisions that may not be fully supported by a bullying population when it comes to protecting individual rights as it becomes necessary to secure those for the minorities. The sacred turf of freedom and liberty seen in protecting the 'individuals vote' can not be over stated as fundamental to the foundation. The Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case of course pitches three strikes in this regard declaring Obama ineligible and the votes cast for him made in contempt of honoring every persons right to at least vote for a qualified candidate.

To secure that right, an allegation of fraudulent identity has been brought to the Court for its consideration as well as the allegation of Obama's failure to qualify as a 'natural born Citizen' by not having two Parents who are U.S. Citizens. The doctrine that foreign influence in the history of a person for two generations be kept strictly American is found in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. One of the misconceptions is seen in the facts that 'natural born Citizenship' can be walked into or earned by immigrants who come here legally stay and have children eligible to be President; but also can be walked out of by for instance a natural born Citizen incorporating foreign influence by marriage and moving out of the United States to start a family in a foreign land. The guarantees that the children of mixed foreign affluent parents as well as foreign birth maintain the same rights to the Presidency is a false narrative to the protections upon which that qualification was established in the first place.

Its not as if America doesn't offer its immigrants the ability to govern up to the U.S. Senate as "Citizen" is the distinction made for that high office, but the United States holds a reward for those generations who stay and propagate families in America in the reservation of the Office of the President, regardless of race, gender,or religion. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is a legal action against Obama and his enablers personally as well as those in office legally within the DNC. The action depicts the damages resulting from the fraudulent actions of identity upon myself as a Candidate, but the Court will consider it a fraudulent action upon Voters much more in their considerations than the mere damages to my person.

CONSIDERING THE ACTIONS OF GOVERNMENT FOR EXTRICATING OR IMPEACHING A USURPER OR UNQUALIFIED PERSON IN THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT

COMMENT Question to CRJ:
Good luck with your endeavor. I truly pray he is exposed. I worry though. If he is impeached, will this actually mean that he will have to first be "considered" as being a president in order to "be" impeached? Furthermore, will his executive actions be legitimized if not overturned by the courts?

Cody Robert JudyJune 11, 2015 at 6:53 AM
@Anonymous 6-11-2015 @2:55AM Up late burning the after midnight oil I see. Good Questions. There can be different types of "Impeachment" under the Guidelines of "Impeachment" proceedings. For instance a "Disability Impeachment Trial" and a "Crimes and Misdemeanors Impeachment Trial" may be brought against one who is elected but not qualified (Amendment XX) as well as an Offense while in Office that would be considered illegal.

It is with this understanding that I have used the words together and not meant for an "Impeachment Trial on the Grounds of a Disability to Execute the Duties of the Office" to be the same as Impeachment of a Qualified President.

The Senate really has the Duty to Remove anyone from the Office of the President who is there illegally for any reason and the word impeachment is used lightly and can also be used for a Usurper-President which is one who was elected but failed to Qualify. For definitive purposes impeachment really means the Extrication of Unlawfulness in the Office of the President and being unqualified but stating you were Qualified is a Crime against the Oath of Office, as well through the Falsification of Identification or I.D. Fraud.

Whether offense has come from not qualifying or crimes while in office is really a simple time question that does not prohibit the use of the word we use referring to "Impeachment of a President" or Extracting a Usurper.

Second Question - Will his Executive Actions be legitimized if not overturned by the Courts?

Upon the Grounds of finding Obama ineligible for the duties of the Office of the President as a disability, of course. Any action with the very use of his signature upon it becomes "Moot". We would not follow the orders of a crazy person in Office and Obama in the Office of the President is technically a perfect condition of a"disability" in the Office of the President.

Exposing his actions does represent a kind of conundrum of sorts 'Insanity' against the Constitution. Obama represents an Unconstitutional Insanity. He is a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution. His executive orders are Orders of Insanity. He has imported an army of illegal aliens and charged tax payers for his illegal standing army. He has orchestrated a mandate of force on Americans in Health Care that encroaches upon freedom and liberty. The damages are heaped up like dung every minute he is in that office.

What I think will happen is the Government will have to initiate a FREEZE of Federal Action as well as Personal until a Orderly Transition can be made. I don't think Biden should be a default President based on his being chosen by an Unconstitutional Insanity. All of the Office below the Office of the President are required to follow the Orders of the President, so what I would suggest according to guidelines of the U.S. Constitution is the U.S. Senate appoint a President Pro Tempore until the matter be resolved by Election.

Former President George W. Bush is the last one to hold the Office legally his experience with the Office as a former President would be an insertion of stability in the interim.

Thanks for the Question]
[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: A Little Sugar for all - Storm of Ineligibility in Supreme Court Docketed Judy v. Obama Solicitor General's Response

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - Little Sugar for all - Storm of Ineligibility in Supreme Court Docketed Judy v. Obama Solicitor General's Response Due

Well Ladies and Gentleman, a little Sugar Post for all of you today from the Supreme Court of the United States which has Docketed the case JUDY V. OBAMA et. al, 14-9396. We are on Official Record. As a matter of NOTICE from yesterday's post, we in fact were recognized as being correct in the March 30th Original Petition and Motions to proceed Informa Pauperis. So the Court did indeed recognized this as an error on their part, which of course happens from time to time. We haven't won anything but to be on and in the Record of the Supreme Court of the United States of America is very honorable.

1) Sheriff Joe's COLD CASE POSSEE's Report on Obama's long form birth birth certificate being a fabrication along with his Draft Registration being fabricated are there.

2)And, a Presidential Candidate with Standing has a Supreme Court Case in the United States representing that Obama is not a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President.

The Solicitor General's response on behalf of Barack Obama is due May 20th, 2015.

Today let us all join hands and say "We Are Birthers!" We do not think fabricated identifications on the person in the Office of the President is okay. We do think our United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. We hold these truths to be evidenced, and that politicians of any party in the United States of America have a responsibility to "We The People" of the United States, who have entrusted to them, under a solemn oath to uphold, support and defend the Constitution of the United States so help us God.

For those who have and continue to deride us for simply taking a stand for the Constitution's demand that a natural born Citizen, Born in the United States to Citizen Parents, be upheld as a key qualification for the person in the Office of the President now, or until such time as it is changed by lawful proceeding in the Congress of the United States, I hope your voice will join us at this time and write, and proffer, and argue that the Case be Heard for the truth we all in our heart desire. I know in your right minds that you do not advocate fabrications and fraudulent identifications for the Office of the President and that you to want law to be in order, and identifications of our elected leaders to be true.

We all don't want to see our votes wasted or to be treated with such nonchalance that the Citizens of our Country lose hope of inspiring hope and change that America will continue to be a land of opportunity with Justice for all who come here and find themselves under the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution.

It is sweet to understand and know that at the very least Individual Citizens, you, and I, have acquired so great a blessing that we can submit and request from the highest Court in the land, the Supreme Court of the United States, a request for justice. If our United States Constitution were not valid, neither would the Court be valid, and neither would any elected official be valid in our land.

We are valid and together with this promise we call our United States Constitution we have the opportunity for Justice. Let us all be very grateful for this and treasure it as the sweetest and purest honey we taste and hold dear for our children and their futures.

I want to especially thank all of you for making the post yesterday break the #TRENDING and #VIRAL thresh hold. Because American's care,.. that's what the message is. We do care and it is important. Thank you so much for sharing and caring for one another as Americans under the umbrella of our United States Constitution.

There will be much more to follow, so do check in and we certainly need all the help we can get. There will be much to consider and I personally thank everyone for their genuine support and help to get us this far, but we have much farther to go so do please chip in if you can. Those who have been with us awhile, take care to help and be kind and patient with those who are new. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for President 2016 - D
www.codyjudy.us

Writ of Certiorari

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262436958/2015-U-S-Supreme-Court-Judy-v-Obama-Writ-Certiorari

2015 U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Writ Certiorari

Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.

Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!

Monday, April 20, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: The Ineligibility Storm in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Judy v. Obama

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: The Ineligibility Storm in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Judy v. Obama

In the interest of so many people wanting to know where the Writ of Certiorari is and why it has not yet been docketed in the Supreme Court of the United States up to this this date of April 20th, it having been served and noticed on this blog and Featured in Editorials here and here , it has come upon me to explain or perhaps redirect focus to where I have found the troubling storm to be in the Supreme Court of the United States.

It is not my wish to draw a scathing picture of criticism or ineptitude upon the brilliance of what is considered the highest Court in the United States of America and I have sat on this very frustrating experience since the Court received and returned my Writ of Certiorari stating to me something that just was not true, that my Motion for Informa Pauperis and Affidavit to the Supreme Court of the United States was not 'signed'.

Indeed, this was not true, clearly there are two signatures. It was a false statement made by the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States. Your right, you would not expect that. I mean its the Supreme Court with the top brass of scholastic legal achievers coming out great schools and high recommendations. Let's face it, there are not to many who get to Clerk for the top Court in the Nation. This is what makes this so disconcerting and inviting to the distortion of the administration of Justice.

With the discretion of the glass being half full, Court Error and Mistakes indeed can occur and it no doubt would be the 'justification' of any Clerk of the Court, but you know there is a standard of difficulty in filing a Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. Shall we say those that have done it know, and if you haven't tried it you wouldn't know. If you've paid for a lawyer to do it you did understand it wasn't cheap and it was a much bigger deal than filing a motion.

Because the Court Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States passed the writ of certiorari as acceptable by not objecting to any part of that in the letter; the only objection or discretionary review that was troublesome to the Clerk was really a complete bewilderment to me. The court clerk stated there was "no signature" on the Motion and Affidavit to proceed with the cost of the proceeding deferred in what is referred to as Informa Pauperis status. There was though. Both the Motion and Affidavit were signed and dated March 30th, 2015 which is the same date the Clerk noticed or acknowledged it was postmarked.

Indeed, we must all scratch our heads about this because on page 2 of that Motion and on page 3 which was the Affidavit is a big fat signature with a date of March 30th, 2015. Now to complicate this just a little bit in so doing the Supreme Court advises that the 'writ of certiorari' cannot be altered in any way as to content. That affirms there isn't anything technically or majorly wrong with it. The backhand to the face comes to the petitioner with the declaration from the Court clerk that the whole petition with the altered Motion and Affidavit must be re-served upon the Defendant/Respondents. The approximated time or purpose in requiring just that basically is shall we say an extra thirty days, more printing cost, and is very burdensome upon the poor or economically challenged class that I myself understand. The disadvantage also cost me a back seat to the Court's schedule and term in 2012 as the back and forth went on something like six times before being docketed finally when a bunch of other cases came up from Georgia that oddly had no Presidential Candidate in them. This of course is an easy shuffle to hide if you wanted to do that sort of thing.

Like I said, most people don't know what's involved. Just to review for those not filing informa pauperis status forty copies of a 54 page printed document in booklet form is required.The cost with the $300 dollar filing fee just for printing and service for mine would be $1386.81 and you can imagine if it cost that much to print it's going to cost a lot more for an attorney to write it especially when the stakes of the circumstances of the writ are factored in. Of course that's chump change for those making over $100,000 in the land of opportunity in the United States economy able to focus their full time effort in doing just that.

But what about those like myself, who are concerned about the opportunity being protected? We have and are dedicating and focusing so much effort into seeing that it is protected that our time is taken, and also is not compensated for? Elected leaders get a paycheck every month that you the tax payer have signed. If you lose elections you don't get a paycheck.

Barack Obama has been getting a paycheck from you the last six years of half a million dollars, as well all the Senators and Representatives with their compensations and appropriations who have been hired across the nation to represent the people none of whom I might add have taken Obama's ineligibility to Court. No not one has their name attached to a Court Record. Does that make the principle of the Constitution that the Office of the President be filled with someone who is a natural born Citizen, -Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents-, less valuable, true, of little consequence if its trampled? Secretary Hillary Clinton's words she wanted to be a Champion, a Champion for the working class People in her declaration and kick off Candidacy? Where or Who is the Champion of the Constitution's 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President?

'Hillary Clinton’s campaign announcement to the press included an embarrassing typo, as it declared the candidate has “fought children and families all her career.” It was, of course, supposed to claim that she fought for children and families.''The hard truth beneath all the gauzy campaign rhetoric is that government power tends to enrich those plugged into government. The ruling Party and its special friends make out like bandits, while everyone else is taught to make do with less. Obama’s tenure has offered an incredibly clear demonstration of this truth'

Well, I'm one of those people who has had to make do with less and make the most out of what I have. That has meant sacrificing tremendously on the focus of making a living for the sake of being a Champion for the U.S. Constitution's demand that a qualified person be in the Office of the President. Indeed, most know that 'standing' requirements for even bringing this to Court are required and notably fall upon someone in the presidential race as a candidate. The translation of that is there is no lawyer, no elected official whose not running for President, no Judge, no Officer of the Law that can Champion this "natural born Citizen' requirement legally. That burden has been mine and I'm the only Candidate for President in the entire United States of America who has done it on a bi-partisan non-racist level. see: McCain Obama consistently.

Now the main stream media, MSM , doesn't want or hasn't thought to tell you this. They continually trump Birthers as 'racist' and even point to Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio who have just entered the ring as Presidential Candidates as proof Birthers are Racist. Now, what do you think of someone who 'hides' and keeps 'secret' in their stories to the public what is plainly available on Court Records for the public? Well, that's seems a little like what the United States Supreme Court Clerk has done to me, actually seeing right there in plain site my signature twice on the first two pages of a document but yet stating its not there. It is there..right there! Everyone can type the numbers in I've provided and see they were delivered. I offer any Political Reporter who would like to see the certification in a submission, but they could also see the 10th Circuit and lower Court had already granted the Informa Pauperis status and its been less then a year since July 7th, 2014 when the original action was filed.

There is no affirmative action ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President and there is no gender diversity clause as an ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President. There's no family genealogy name required for the Office of the President and no former elected office requirement for the Office of the President. There's no economic millionaire status for the Office of the President, but there is a 'natural born Citizen' status or requirement. I really think its a dis-service to journalism to see so many 'racist' and 'sexist' reviews for the Office of the President but that is exactly what is happening when you withhold vital information that is pertinent to the Constitution's requirements.

Not building my story on 'racism' or 'sexism' hasn't been hard. Why it has been withheld from the public in the form of media print is what an example of 'secretive journalism', 'stealth reporting' or 'camouflaged court referencing' what is it? You know one thing the Reporters really hate is when a Government Representative in affect 'frame' a story by withholding very important information that would either make the story completely different or at least completely change the affect of the story. Well, don't you think "Reporters" that the public feels the same way about you 'forgetting' information or 'failing' to run a Court search or read a Court record before you print a story that is handed to you for your convenience on this blog? The truthfulness of a Record is an accounting of all the facts, not dust sweeping a few of them for the convenience of the political popular under the carpet.

The mirage of stability that has been built upon a weak foundation or lies is a credibility problem. It certainly is not little old me who threatens everything Obama has built, it is Obama's own weak foundation that threatens his own work. He didn't build it on truth, but built it on a lie. It doesn't matter how high it is or how grand it is if the foundation isn't true any structural engineer will tell you that it won't last. The United States of America's foundation has proven strong. Principle is much greater in power than any particular party or person. The principles will stand long after we are gone.

That all being said, I have tried to hold my tongue or key board, hoping the Supreme Court would see this error but it seems more and more likely that if they can sweep anything under the carpet that has Obama's name on it, especially coming from someone who is a eligible and qualified Candidate for Office of the U.S. President who has standing, they will do it. Let's hope it just a clerical error, but their error cost me another $14 dollars in mailing. Of course that's just nickels and dimes for rich people who sometimes it seems just don't get it.

UPDATE of this POST CASE NUMBER NOTICED IN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Redacted Writ of Certiorari for Judy ( A U.S. Presidential Candidate ’08, ’12, ‘16) v. Obama (President Elect failing to Qualify Amend XX) et. al., signed and submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States post marked March 30th, 2015. Included are the important Ltr 2, and Ltr. 1 to the Court Clerk with the assigned United States Postal Service tracking numbers available for anyone to look up at usps.com as proof that they were served and received, and in so describe no fault of the Petitioner as to the delay of docketing this Case. It should be noted the page numbers of this redacted version are meant as a convenience but are otherwise in order as prescribed by each section having its own page numbers in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Informa pauperis Motion and Affidavit are acknowledged by the Clerk’s letter but are redacted from this document.

Writ of Certiorari

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262436958/2015-U-S-Supreme-Court-Judy-v-Obama-Writ-Certiorari