Showing posts with label Hillary Rodham Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Rodham Clinton. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

ICEBERG TIP: On A Personal Server, All Emails Are Private


BREAKING NEWS

ICEBERG TIP: On A Personal Server, All Emails Are Personal
IT's THAT BIG!

Hillary's conceptual semantics game with the FBI Criminal Investigation, as well as the Judicial Watch Citizens United FOIA just went into over-drive. On the one hand we have Hillary stating she did not want any chance of her personal emails becoming public to her long time aid Huma Abedin recently deposed under oath. On the other hand Hillary knew all of the emails on her Personal Server were not subject to anyone but herself as judge, jury, and deliverer to any FOIA REQUEST. So 'all the emails' she was referencing in an email correspondence with aid Huma Abedin were in fact "personal" to her and in conceptual semantics she knew the State Department would have to go through her to get anything off her personal server, in fact making every email she wrote whether personal or business, or received as Secretary of State [personal]. This is how the Secretary of State Office of the United States Government was subverted and usurped. No one else had access to it, until the FBI recovered what they did after her Server was confiscated.

If we are privileged to Hillary's own brand of conceptual semantics, she has just reported to her husband over dinner, "The ICEBERG TIP has just cracked through the hull Bill, and we're taking in serious water."

"Clinton responded in the 2010 exchange that she could get a “separate address or device” but said she didn’t “want any risk of the personal being accessible,” according to the e-mail chain. Abedin replied that the missed communications were “not a good system.”

Again, "personal" included all secretary of state business emails, because in Hillary's mind, the State Department did not have access to her personal server, she knew she was conducting all of her secretary of state business on. To sure up this point we simply need to ask Hillary why she chose to go through herself and decide what emails were personal and which ones were private? The follow up question would be how did you expect the State Department to submit to FOIA request on the Secretary of State Office under your tenure?

"State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, in a statement that Clinton had said repeatedly that the 55,000 pages represented “all federal email records in her custody.” 

We know of 165 pages that were not submitted but were indeed Secretary of State Business. On Monday, Judicial Watch, published an additional 165 pages of e-mails from Clinton’s time as secretary of state. Those e-mails sabotage Clinton’s claim she turned over all work-related e-mails to the State Department after stepping down in 2013.

A June 29th AP Report states "Judicial Watch lawyers repeatedly pressed Abedin to explain Clinton's concern expressed to her in a November 2010 message that her emails might become public, but the longtime aide insisted that Clinton's interest in wanting to keep her personal correspondence from being exposed was similar to any private citizen's."

That's were we see the 'semantics code' being used between Hillary Clinton and her Aid Huma Abedin. They both knew that the state department had no access to Hillary's Private Server of which Huma in her continued employ after the New York U.S. Senate and 2008 Presidential Run with Hillary took up residence with her own Clinton-server-email address.

The AP Report is grossly covering tracks for Hillary Clinton, or is in the journalistic mire of the campaign's clutches though as the two paragraphs from the story relate: 

"Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin said in a legal proceeding that Clinton did not want the private emails that she mixed in with State Department emails on her private computer server to be accessible to "anybody," according to transcripts released Wednesday."

"But Clinton's private server contained tens of thousands of work-related emails as well as private messages, and her decision to conduct both private and government business on her system meant that she kept control of both types of correspondence, effectively preventing her State Department correspondence from being archived by the agency and made available for public records requests. It was not until late 2014 - more than a year after Clinton left office - that the State Department learned that she held all of her email and requested that she turn over all work-related records.

This last underlined sentence is very important and is blatantly false as the Memorandum of March 17th, 2009 relates. In a Post Report filed yesterday on this Blog we read of the State Department's awareness in 2009 of the Private Server as well as it's location:

 Judicial Watch Uncovers Smoking Gun Clinton Emails
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/06/28/judicial-watch-uncovers-smoking-gun-clinton-emails/
OBAMA KNEW
March 17, 2009 memorandum prepared by S/ES-IRM staff regarding communications equipment in the Secretary’s New York residence identified a server located in the basement. (This email shows early on that the Obama State Department was very much aware of Mrs. Clinton’s email serverdown to its very location in her house!)

However, that lapse in the Associated Press's June 29th article might be minuscule to the giant revelation coming from the National Review June 29th article that reveals the titanic may have just had contact with the tip of the iceberg. That's the two billion dollar Clinton Foundation Charity. In fact in another story from National Review today we learn the State Department was aiding and abetting the very covert work of Clinton's Secretary of State Business and the Clinton Foundation Charity work!

"Citizens United is slated to receive all e-mails sent to and from Lona Valmoro, Clinton’s State Department scheduler, in the two-week periods before each of 14 international trips Clinton took during her four years in office. David Bossie, president of Citizens United, hopes to confirm suspicions that Clinton maintained an off-the-books schedule, meeting with Clinton Foundation donors on the taxpayer’s dime. “Citizens United wants to know how many overseas dinners Secretary Clinton attended with Clinton Foundation donors that didn’t make it on her schedule,” he says."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437312/hillary-clinton-emails-secret-meetings-clinton-foundation-donors

"Citizens United presented the judge with several pieces of evidence suggesting Valmoro deliberately struck from the official schedule a December 6, 2012 dinner in Dublin, Ireland with several Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign donors, organized by Teneo co-founder Declan Kelly. Though Valmoro was made aware of the Dublin meeting through an earlier e-mail chain, neither Clinton’s archived daily calendar nor her detailed official schedule make any note of it. Citizens United characterizes the State Department’s decision to go along with the filing as an acknowledgement that Clinton did, in fact, maintain a secret schedule. Collyer was apparently convinced, ordering the State Department on Wednesday to produce 500 pages of Valmoro’s e-mails by the end of August. An additional 500 pages will be released every four weeks from that date, until Citizens United obtains all messages relating to the 14 overseas trips specified."

THE CONSCIENCE CLAUSE

The only saving grace Democrats may have now is what is called a Conscience Clause which is based on the Delegates in the Primaries of every State being released and not being bound to the Candidate of their State's Primary based on the lies and fabrications that were covered up by that Candidates own corruption in past circumstances and situations initiated by the Democratic Party National Convention's Rules Committee.

Delegates should/shall not be bound to any Candidate so entangled by criminal corruption in previous Government Office as privatizing entire offices of the United States Government. This is a Republic. We the People did not authorize the Secretary of State Office to be usurped by Hillary Clinton anymore than we authorized the Office of the President to be usurped by someone who is not a [natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.] U.S. Supreme Court ref: Minor v. Happersett.  and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41tTkKrBQ4&feature=player_embedded


________________________


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!








































Tuesday, June 28, 2016

SPECIAL REPORT : The "Crooked Hillary" Label Democrats are Setting In Stone

SPECIAL REPORT


The "Crooked Hillary" Label Democrats are Setting In Stone
THE PUBLIC TRIAL BE CONDUCTED
PART I
PART II Continued here:

One of the main reasons for a Primary Season in any General Election Year is to formidably test the Candidates within the particular Political Party before the selection for representation is made. The 'presumption' the Democrats have made this year that has noticeably been egregious to Candidates such as myself in a coronation standardization evidenced by everything from the miniaturized-weekender-debate-schedule to the favored-candidate-status in the mechanics of the Democratic Party contact munitions favoring Hillary Rodham Clinton, with the greatest qualification from the Candidate's own mouth being, "Don't you want to see a women be President, as if she's about to lift her skirt, may just be the worst thing to every happen to women in the equality of gender movement.

One might ask if I'm a registered in the Democratic Party why I would offer such harsh criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton as a Candidate for President? The best answer I can give you is because I do indeed care deeply about the pivotal social issues of our time and frankly the representation of inclusiveness that for a long time Democrats have shared for the Constitution,Civil Rights, and the representation of Justice for all U.S. Citizens that government corruption can wipe out without the scrutiny. No team can really get on the field and play a good game without scrimmage practices and come game day those that do will take the field to their chagrin.

Democrats flatly refused anyone on the Debate Stage who was willing to formidably test Hillary Clinton the way Republicans will and are beginning to now, which was a Big Mistake. If I would have been allowed on the Stage I would have objected to Senator Sanders classifying the Private Server she maintained of the Government Secretary of State Office for the People as a "Horror Novel" rather than something we shouldn't be interested in.  Not only has the democratic party baptized itself in the stagnated lead tainted water of the shark pool known as 'Group Think' filtered only by party Established Insiders running the Democratic Party like Muammar Gaddafi into rebel forces where he was cornered and then killed by rebel forces, but in the delusion of 'Gender Classification', they have espoused in "government corruption practices" a preferred type of scrimmage which is only a laughing stock by the standard of our Constitution Republic and a hope as a Light to the World.

Just three hours ago the Washington Post released a story [Hillary Clinton's email story gets harder and harder to believe]  Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/28/hillary-clintons-email-story-continues-to-get-harder-and-harder-to-believe/ wherein they report upon 165 pages that were just released that were not among the 55,000 she chose to release to the State Department via the FOIA Request while she was Secretary of State providing a glimpse into how Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) works when in Government Office appointing herself as judge, jury and executioner in what can only be called a nefarious responsibility to the Public Service requirements that communications for Public Office be subject to public oversight proving at best bad decision and, at worst, something more sinister on the level of Treason.

Saying it's harder and harder to believe HRC is about as kind as you can get when calling someone you need to trust, like your husband or wife, a Liar, as they are stuck in denial when you roll out the video in front of them romping in the car with the low jack auto upload YouTube Station you installed for the public display of their affair and affection. With the Youtube Video rolling Hillary is saying it wasn't her, she wasn't there, and it had to be an animation trick of some kind.

Yes, it was a "Trick" alright more stylized in the urban dictionary than a magic act. The problem is the consequences of the "Lies" she has told on the Debate Stage tens of millions of people have fallen victim to as "Everything Partisan". How can it be partisan if I am a Democrat Candidate for President registered with the FEC and a Democratic Party member? In fact how can what I'm saying not be believed when it is solidified by the fact that you haven't heard of me in the Main Stream Media but the Federal Election Commission knows me, so does Facebook, so does Twitter, so does Blogspot, so does my web site up for 8 years www.codyjudy.us , and so does the U.S. Supreme Court along with about 14 other Courts it took to get Judy v. Obama 14-9396?

The level of Group Think is horrifying said the monkeys of hear no evil, see no evil , speak no evil. The problem is not remotely HRC's alone, but is a culmination represented in a combination of corruption cast by an ineligible candidate for President running in 2008 with a fraudulent identification long form birth certificate fabricated and released by his own hand in 2011 at the behest of Donald Trump poignantly on The View and illustrated in Part I of this Report by Judge Jeanine.

It's only getting worse as the Smoking Gun was uncovered showing Obama's State Department, and thus Obama by complicity knew all about his Secretary of State running an anti-FOIA OPERATION.
 Judicial Watch Uncovers Smoking Gun Clinton Emails
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/06/28/judicial-watch-uncovers-smoking-gun-clinton-emails/
OBAMA KNEW
March 17, 2009 memorandum prepared by S/ES-IRM staff regarding communications equipment in the Secretary’s New York residence identified a server located in the basement. (This email shows early on that the Obama State Department was very much aware of Mrs. Clinton’s email server, down to its very location in her house!)

We must ask ourselves to take a look in the mirror in a serious self-scrutiny Democrats. How on earth can we be representing the Constitution, Civil Rights, and the Jurisdiction and Protections in the United States of America for Justice for All when the corrupt leaders are so corrupt and anti-American that when the Benghazi Report finally comes out, or when Americans watch the Movie 13 Hours, or read the book Clinton Cash or see that movie set to Release on the Eve of the Democratic National Convention July 24th, 2016, Americans cannot hold their lunches down?

Clinton Cash investigates how Bill and Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with $2 billion in donations to their foundation, wealth accumulated during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as Sec. of State through lucrative speaking fees and contracts paid for by foreign companies and Clinton Foundation donors.

Under the constructs of the Labeling theory concerns are identified mostly not with the normal roles that define our lives, but with those very special roles that society provides for deviant behavior, called deviant roles, stigmatic roles, or social stigma.  What in years ahead will we be telling our little boys not to be a Tricky-Dick or for our little girls not to be a "Crooked-Hillary" with the 50 Facts Donald Trump just outlined? A social role is a set of expectations we have about a behavior. Social roles are necessary for the organization and functioning of any society or group. We expect the postman, for example, to adhere to certain fixed rules about how he does his job. "Deviance" for a sociologist does not mean morally wrong, but rather behavior that is condemned by society. Deviant behavior can include both criminal and non-criminal activities.
Many Christians have been especially apposed to Trump's special brand of what's called 'Identity Politics' based on philosophies of not wanting to offend. The problem is when the "Truth" is understood as a foundation and a label is denied in a delusion, education of the subjects cannot be measured and therefore is not real.

Obama and the main stream media have been very good at the virtue of labeling Birthers as those who simply want the [natural born Citizen] clause of the qualification for President upheld as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as is mentioned in the SCOTUS Case of Minor v. Happersett, Obama fails, and which prohibits those such as the shooters in San Bernardino, California. and Orlando, Florida from the Office of the President, although the hand is extended for them to be Representatives and Senators.

TRUTH is SOMETHING Christians have been getting farther and farther away from. I came across this article entitled The Virtue of Name-Calling or Labels and immediate thought of both Main Stream Media unapologetic pajorative of Birthers, their distaste for it used against Hillary, and Donald Trump's brand during the Primary Election season? 

When we are labeled a wonderful chance for introspection is created. Is there Truth about Hillary Clinton being ‪#‎CrookedHillary‬? What is the Truth to the U.S, Supreme Court Justices being a pit of Vipers or ‪#‎PigsOfJustice‬ for the discrimination of income Inequality in denying a forma pauperis motion in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the Media still refuses to identify as corruption and denying Evidence of The Constitutions Qualification for President? Can we not see if the Qualifications would have been upheld on Obama that the corruption of Clinton in what's happened just since 2008 wouldn't have been allowed? We have to remember justice slipping through the cracks has intense ramifications of the Trust of the People, as well as the Hope of the People! When Trust is destroyed so is the Hope.

[ In the Virtue of Labels we can find Truth and Jesus Christ used and employed labels in truth-telling quite often. Those who take the Truth to be hard are wicked those who receive Truth will benefit in correction. (Unfortunately, most professed Christians today seem never to have gotten past Matthew 7. That’s too bad, for they should proceed to read Matthew 23. In that chapter alone, Christ calls the scribes and Pharisees names 16 times. The names are “hypocrites” (7 times), “son of Hell” (once),”blind guides” (twice), “fools and blind” (3 times), “whited sepulchres” (once), “serpents” (once), and “offspring of vipers” (once). Since Christ was without sin, we may deduce by good and necessary consequence that name-calling as such is not a sin. Since everything Christ did was righteous and virtuous, we may deduce by good and necessary consequence that accurate name-calling is a virtue.) ] http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=8

I suppose in essence when the shoe fits you wear it, but Democrats have also been saddled up with corruption based on fabrications, frauds, and lies these two Candidates have represented themselves with, making it very dis-heartening for Democrats who truly want to represent the culture of American Jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution.

THE CONSCIENCE CLAUSE

The only saving grace Democrats may have now is what is called a Conscience Clause which is based on the Delegates in the Primaries of every State being released and not being bound to the Candidate of their State's Primary based on the lies and fabrications that were covered up by that Candidates own corruption in past circumstances and situations initiated by the Democratic Party National Convention's Rules Committee.

Delegates should/shall not be bound to any Candidate so entangled by criminal corruption in previous Government Office as privatizing entire offices of the United States Government. This is a Republic. We the People did not authorize the Secretary of State Office to be usurped by Hillary Clinton anymore than we authorized the Office of the President to be usurped by someone who is not a [natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.] U.S. Supreme Court ref: Minor v. Happersett.  and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.
God Forbid!

Red Flags noticed by the Huffington Post [You might be dating a Sociopath] the same might be seen as true when it comes to Courting a Candidate for President of the United States in Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama when we really start looking at the Standards of Law. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has refused my Case that has standing in defining and defending that standard of the qualification for President dismissing it on a arbitrarily denied Motion for forma pauperis is more of a witness of confirmation for me than it is a confirmation for Obama when most Constitutional Scholars agree its unsettled law and everyone sees millions of dollars tied up in Campaigns that are questionably illegal. 

RED FLAG #1. Having an oversized ego.

RED FLAG #2. Lying and exhibiting manipulative behavior.

RED FLAG #3. Exhibiting a lack of empathy

RED FLAG #4. Showing a lack of remorse or shame.

RED FLAG #5. Staying eerily calm in scary or dangerous situations.

RED FLAG #6. Behaving irresponsibly or with extreme impulsivity.

RED FLAG #7. Having few friends.

RED FLAG #8. Being charming—but only superficially.

RED FLAG #9. Living by the “pleasure principle.

RED FLAG #10. Showing disregard for societal norms.

RED FLAG #11. Having “intense” eyes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41tTkKrBQ4&feature=player_embedded


________________________


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


























Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Breaking Report: PRESIDENTIAL POLITICAL PAUPERIS The U.S. Supreme Court Case Primed to Define NBCtzn


Breaking Report: Featured at The POST & EMAIL

~PRESIDENTIAL POLITICAL PAUPERIS~ 
The U.S. Supreme Court Case Primed to Define Natural Born Citizen

Carl Hulse, New York Times Washington Editor and accomplished writer has opined a piece in the New York Times with the Trump "It May Be Time to Resolve the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen"

Indeed TIME maybe the very consideration of both [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents espousing two generations of USA allegiance, as well as the consideration of the progressive liberal concern bringing up the conservative qualification for the Office of the President in light of 17 foreign born members of Congress as well as the 7 year mark that Barack Obama just passed in the Office of the President.

Indeed Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has come into the high-beam Birther Headlights with Leading Poll GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump asserting, who Cruz calls the left wing liberal activist lawyer Lawrence H. Tribe who was Al Gore's Lawyer in Bush v. Gore as well a Hillary Clinton supporter, that there were some very big Constitutional scholars who are saying Cruz is not eligible in the last GOP Debate.

Incidentally, Cruz left out of his commentary in the debate about Lawrence H. Tribe that he had cited him in commentary twice in Cases he had argued. The Medellin v. Texas Brief and Columbia v. Heller case principled around the second amendment individual right to bear arms.

It is the case the liberal and conservatism in many respects make good bed-fellows. After all, the bedrock legislative mandate for qualification of [natural born Citizen] remains one of the last bastions of hope for the U.S. Constitution unchanged in the Founding ARTICLES.

Ultimately Cruz apposes as a conservative along with what would be a solid majority of Conservative Based Media the [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] holding of precedent conducted by the Minor v. Happersett's U.S. Supreme Court. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity have all disparaged the [natural born Citizen] Birther arguments and refused to even host the legitimate Big Players in the Birther Movement born in modern era of 2008 questions regarding Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama's ineligibility based on two fundamental questions: Place and Parents

With Obama it was : Parents and Place
1- The conferred Citizenship of his father who was never a U.S. Citizen but rather citizen of Kenya.
2- The confusion between lawful agencies the public has looked to circumscribing confusion around Obama's birth place with Hawaii Officials and Sheriff Joe Arpiao's Cold Case Posse Investigation directed out of necessity of Citizen of Arizona.

With McCain it was mainly:
Place
1- Born in Panama

As a founding Principle in the Articles of the Constitution the [natural born Citizen] clause may have indeed been one of the very few principles that liberals and conservatives of the time could agree upon and it is quite interesting to notice that those pretending 'conservative' principles are now so apposed to it and those who are touted liberal may indeed now be turning for it.

Nothing in the Grim-Reapers's theater of fears and horrible night terrors grips most of the liberal progressives than that of a Cruz Administration. The one that dances with the devil entertaining an end to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices [Life Tenure] based on the ability to drift from the conservative round-tables of Pro-Life and Defense of Marriage Act that protected opposite gender marriage and ultimately smash Planned Parenthood in the mouth hard.

It's not hard to imagine that just as the winds of Obama have sped up the liberal agenda to the north, that a Cruz Administration could not speed up conservative agenda to the south just as strong wiping out [Life Tenure] in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The concerns of Balance are brought up when of course our Checks and Balances begin to fail us.


Part II.
Checks and Balances and Political Pauperis

One of the great successes of America has been the relative difficult prospect of changing the Constitution. As the New York Times article mentioned " ...changing the Constitution is purposefully complicated and requires overwhelming backing from Congress and state legislatures." Indeed it may be the eight attempts by some members of Congress to change the [natural born Citizen] clause required for the Office of President and Vice President since 2003 that gives The People the vote through their elected officials, that this is not to be changed. It has always been The People's Will and should not change until Congress has a 2/3rds majority authorizing it by the will of the People.

The Courts are only to decide wither Legislation by Congress is Unconstitutional. The Standard of that is The U.S. Constitution. While Obama has largely remained unscathed by the arguments against his eligibility as a [natural born Citizen] it has not been because it did not reach the U.S. Supreme Court. In Fact, Judy v. Obama 14-9396 just two months ago suffered the greatest discrimination of Political Pauperis by the Court as you could imagine.

Yes! Imagine the headlines in the New York Times now wanting after 7 years of Obama unscathed by a real Trial in Court on his eligibility , the matter resolved? Of course Ted Cruz supporters are pointing to Obama as he got away with it, why can't Sen. Cruz?

The case which is so ripe and primed for the U.S. Supreme Court to take is a case brought by a Presidential Candidate in fact in the Democratic Party against Barack Obama, however, it has listed in it Sen. Cruz half a dozen times. Indeed hearing the case has become if you count the New York Times influence a Main Stream Media Trumpet.

While it plays into the Donald Trump's hand to wipe out his closest rival Ted Cruz, it also plays into former Governor Jeb Bush's hand to absorb Ted Cruz's constituents after Cruz is found ineligible. And while not hearing the Case may play into Mr. Trump's hand because he obviously is content with the loud speaker over Court Documents for a ruling, Mr. Judy's Camp in 2016 is weakened by the Court not hearing it. So is the Court [not hearing] the Case helping Mr. Trump more or hurting Mr. Judy? How is it helping Obama, how is it affecting H. Clinton, and would hearing it hurt Mr. Trump?

Of course these are all political questions and the Court has a scape-goat called the political doctrine question, however, the wisdom in using it and waiting for an Election to bring to them a case like Bush v. Gore is insane, when the relative sublime case of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 exist without an Election hinging in the balances.

This allows as Question Number 1 suggest the Court to render an Opinion that could be far reaching in getting America back on the same page when it comes to the Qualification of the President nipping in the bud what really could escalate into a Civil War that could end Life Tenure for the U.S. Supreme Court permanently. Probably the biggest most pivotal issue of our Time is indeed this case.

Cody Robert Judy is the only American Candidate running for President who indeed holds a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on both major Parties in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama.  The problem with his 14-9396 Case was not a matter of the question not being right, it had to do with his Forma Pauperis Motion being denied. Judy lacked the funds to produce the printing cost and filing fees required by the U.S. Supreme Court.

He had also lacked the funds for the two Lower Courts the case came out of in the Federal District Court Utah Division and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, however those courts granted him Forma Pauperis. Based on the U.S. Supreme Court not granting him the right to proceed with his Writ of Certiorari by granting his Forma Pauperis, the Federal Form for the Motion being a 12 Month Form, the Case coming in the same year, and the Court not denying his Motion based on Rule 39.8 abusive and excessive filings, it is Mr. Judy's Opinion based on the facts that the U.S. Supreme Court has basically engaged in a Presidential Political Pauperis and it is representative of the #waronpoor Senator Bernie Sanders has taken to new heights in his platform for President.

There is however no U.S. Supreme Court Rule that states that the Supreme Court Justices cannot go back and revisit this Motion for Review. Mistakes can happen, and Mr. Judy hopes that it is indeed a mistake that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerks may have been involved in and the Justices are not even perhaps aware of.

Of course if the New York Times would take the time to research cases found Denied in October of 2015, a short 2.5 months ago, and print a story about it, their wishes that the U.S. Supreme Court actually hear the case that could indeed save the Country from a bitter political division hinging on an election could be avoided.

CRJ


My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016


BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 





The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.


Thank You!

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign




Cody Robert Judy

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy




Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!





Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

































Wednesday, October 14, 2015

BREAKING NEWS U.S. SUPREME COURT ELIGIBILITY CHANGING - A LOSING STRATEGY the DNC Debate and the HRC Show


CHANGING - A LOSING STRATEGY 
The DNC Debate and the HRC Show 

The ‪#‎DEMOCRATDEBATE‬ failed miserably attracting a bit more than half of the R Debate Ratings. The Losing Strategy for ‪#‎Democrats‬ due in large part to their exclusiveness rather than inclusiveness.
The Privileged Class was on full display last night sadly on the HRC Show. It may be true, the Democratic Party has lost their way in GroupThink.
The GOP R Party has rode ‪#‎Obama‬ to victories in The House, The Senate, and now the [P]residency as they racked up more unqualified Candidates than Democrats.
The BLIND ‪#‎MAINSTREAMMedia‬ & Hollywood can't see what's happening and how bad the abuse of Obama has been exploited fully by Republicans.
The Obama Party is over- like a puppet on the strings failing as the puppet master releases the strings. The Fraudulent Life of the puppet is seen as Fake; no more entertainment- an old tired show- the usefulness is over.
Did you listen to the poor ‪#‎Inequality‬ and income disparity Sen. Sanders spoke of under the last 7 years of Obama? The DISASTER & FAILURE are anyone recognizing we have had a qualified President.

THE INCREDIBLE MISTAKE BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396

The U.S. SUPREME COURT has made a BIG MISTAKE in depriving Justice to everyone in America in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 by depriving those earning 12 to 13K a year access in forma pauperis predominantly resting on Justice Sotomayor. While the Democratic Party by all accounts of their own standard candidates recognizes the income disparity on one hand upon America, and celebrates a supposed Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court purportedly as a great defense for such within the Court,  to not grant access to the Court on such is a blatant income disparaging outrage really warranting 'bad behavior' in this Case.


By so many accounts the United States Supreme Court has the duty to uphold precedent when dicta has over-ruled one of their decisions. This has been the  case in Arkeny and the natural born Citizen considerations in Minor v. Happersett concerning the natural born Citizen qualification for the Office of the President. The blatant refusal to ward off 'LOOKING' at the case is indicative of a disparaging ruling upon the poor or a blatant refusal to avoid duty resulting in a candid 'bad behavior' emphasis as was once pinned upon the Supreme Court Justice Chase for ruling in such a partisan way in a departure of the ensured independence of the judiciary.

The Court can certainly recognize mistakes in its clerical patterns and practices at any time. I for one do not see the Justices huddled around their calculators deducting the cost of business from the net income from Mr. Judy's  (my) 5 page in-depth Motion to proceed in forma pauperis as much as I do see a sheet of paper brought in summarizing the clerks work and recommendations to the Justices about 500 cases who all got the same treatment in a broad swipe of the Justices pen.

Unfortunately, Public Outcry is the only solutions for the Justices to recognize a mistake that has been made and to work to correct that problem. So I would encourage people who would like to write the Court and flood the phone bank with a cry of injustice. If we do not object to falling in the cracks we have only to be left to look at ourselves falling through the cracks.

As far as the U.S. Supreme Court not wanting to get involved in the political arena, they have long missed that boat. By forbidding Review of the 'natural born Citizen' clause I have brought to their front door, they have single handily kept me out of the Democratic Party Debate and stifled as a Candidate for President who has been doing the job of preserving, defending, and protecting the U.S. Constitution's core Office in the Executive Branch and shirking their own duty of checks and balances.

To prove the point, let them acknowledge the clerical error to withhold forma pauperis standing of my case, approve the Cert for Review, and see if I do not get invited to the next Democratic debate as the only Candidate with a Constitutional Case in the U.S. Supreme Court? Who is saying that doesn't work is really in denial and disillusioned with Justice.

As I have thought of a defining theme of my Campaign, I cannot escape the call for JUSTICE that resonates as so vital to America. Without Justice we are left to crooks and cheats gaming the system in the knowledge of how to do it best and for so many to be left to injustice based on their poor circumstances. I cannot in short order regret my circumstances if my clarion call for JUSTICE is magnified in the hearts of every Citizen, including a whole lot of lawyers who are staring at their own scales of justice and recognizing whole heartedly what is happening here. Someone must say STOP.

We all heard Mr. Anderson Cooper relay his relief that his 5 Presidential Candidates made it back from their restroom break in time during the commercial break. The Democratic Party itself has in a way denied the anti-establishment movement in America represented by the three leading Republicans who have never been elected by only exhibiting in the debate those who have been elected before. In the opinion of American Interest the philosophy is stifling and repugnant. The qualifications for the Office of the President did not include 'holding some prior elected office' as Kenya's Government holds in their Constitution,  but that is all the Democratic Wing of the Media will focus on it appears here in America.

AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD 
Mrs. CLINTON when her action demonstrates willful neglect to public transparency through FOIA

 The decision to bar Mr. Judy from proceeding with his Certiorari can only be seen as a much bigger MISTAKE than Mrs. Clinton thinking she could not log on to two email accounts on one device.
The Decisions together are perilous towards our National Security and are not benign. They are SIGNS of a malignant, fast-moving, and life-threatening cancer set about destroying the shield in the spine leading directly to the bone marrow.
Conservatives fooled about the plan for Republicans to "Ride Obama" into the dirt as far as they could, taking the House, taking the Senate, and poised now to take the Presidency are as fooled as Democrats are the Birther Movement at its heart is somehow racist rather than Constitutional.
For Democratic Candidates to see the 10 to 12 Trillion added on to the National Debt during Obama's Usurpation as a mark of success as "they" bailed BIG CORPORATIONS out as to BIG to fail, is simply more of a witness than a Complaint of the severe manipulation of evidence Mrs HILLARY Clinton is disguising by opening her fly to expose the Reason she should be elected President as well the VIDEOTAPE being the cause of Benghazi.
Its monumentally shallow as well as embarrassing!
We witnessed last night in the DEMOCRATIC Debate the good old days of Glass-Steagle" wished for without a simple acknowledgment it was President Clinton's parting DISASTER upon an otherwise pretty healthy economy.
Sen. Sanders sounded like a true communist socialist vowing to get a million-man gang and TAKE the CLINTON'S down as well as all the other Corporate Wealthy Elite and fundamentally excusing Mrs Clinton's White Collar Excuses as a Government Employee skirting FOIA.
Of course the GROUPTHINK in the Tank cheered as they have no clue how BIG of a National Security Breach has occurred and why would they 'cheer' to have their own ability to get government records access from Officers of our own Government?

WHAT IF MRS. CLINTON JUDGED HER SELF?
One of the most interesting Spectre[s] however of the Debate was Mrs. Clinton's harsh penalty recommendations for wiki leaks Snowden in comparison to Sen Sanders over all educational and awareness attribution to be considered in a Penalty Exactness.
The conclusion: Mrs. Clinton would certainly indict herself with an FBI Indictment for mistakes far superior to General Petraeus mistakes. Let that be the contemplation of the Media Press Room Cheers as it's a witness Mrs. Clinton holds herself above the Law and everyone else to The Standard of The Law.
I think by her own words and ability for Mercy she condemns herself. Asked about who their biggest enemies were Mrs. Clinton also ended a long list with an enlightened emphasis on "Republicans", which does not bode well for a President who has to work across the isle with Republicans.
It seemed exactly on point for Mrs. Clinton to assert The employment of Partisan Politics at what she claimed was also her mistake on a personal choice of an email server, as well as the narrative of the videotape in Benghazi thoroughly dis proven by bi partisan Congressional Committee.
The Cheers of the Crowd at the Debate for Bernie Sanders self-admitted-lapse "who cares about your (HRC) dang emails", could have just as easily be shaped by the participants of The Pay-to-Play investors of the Clinton Global Initiative being relieved their investment didn't tank.. [N]ot understanding their own GROUPTHINK as the world moaned around them.
The saddest thing to me of course was knowing there was an extra lectern that CNN chose not to employ in Raising their own Ratings to a curious American audience with my own Campaign Represented.
They chose as a cost of doing business in the Political Arena to quite the Stage, Suppress their own audience, and empty their own pockets in not having me there.
The interest this year in un-elected Candidates and an anti-establishment Crowd in America only symbolizes the degree of THINKTANK GROUPTHINK besieging our American Businesses in a whole lot of what The MSM deplores and Trump aptly calls ‪#‎Stupid‬.
http://money.cnn.com/…/cnn-democratic-debate-rat…/index.html

Thank You! 
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!



Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS