Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
ICEBERG TIP: On A Personal Server, All Emails Are Personal
IT's THAT BIG!
Hillary's conceptual semantics game with the FBI Criminal Investigation, as well as the Judicial Watch Citizens United FOIA just went into over-drive. On the one hand we have Hillary stating she did not want any chance of her personal emails becoming public to her long time aid Huma Abedin recently deposed under oath. On the other hand Hillary knew all of the emails on her Personal Server were not subject to anyone but herself as judge, jury, and deliverer to any FOIA REQUEST. So 'all the emails' she was referencing in an email correspondence with aid Huma Abedin were in fact "personal" to her and in conceptual semantics she knew the State Department would have to go through her to get anything off her personal server, in fact making every email she wrote whether personal or business, or received as Secretary of State [personal]. This is how the Secretary of State Office of the United States Government was subverted and usurped. No one else had access to it, until the FBI recovered what they did after her Server was confiscated.
If we are privileged to Hillary's own brand of conceptual semantics, she has just reported to her husband over dinner, "The ICEBERG TIP has just cracked through the hull Bill, and we're taking in serious water."
"Clinton responded in the 2010 exchange that she could get a “separate address or device” but said she didn’t “want any risk of the personal being accessible,” according to the e-mail chain. Abedin replied that the missed communications were “not a good system.”
Again, "personal" included all secretary of state business emails, because in Hillary's mind, the State Department did not have access to her personal server, she knew she was conducting all of her secretary of state business on. To sure up this point we simply need to ask Hillary why she chose to go through herself and decide what emails were personal and which ones were private? The follow up question would be how did you expect the State Department to submit to FOIA request on the Secretary of State Office under your tenure?
"State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, in a statement that Clinton had said repeatedly that the 55,000 pages represented “all federal email records in her custody.”
We know of 165 pages that were not submitted but were indeed Secretary of State Business. On Monday, Judicial Watch, published an additional 165 pages of e-mails from Clinton’s time as secretary of state. Those e-mails sabotage Clinton’s claim she turned over all work-related e-mails to the State Department after stepping down in 2013.
A June 29th AP Report states"Judicial Watch lawyers repeatedly pressed Abedin to explain Clinton's concern expressed to her in a November 2010 message that her emails might become public, but the longtime aide insisted that Clinton's interest in wanting to keep her personal correspondence from being exposed was similar to any private citizen's."
That's were we see the 'semantics code' being used between Hillary Clinton and her Aid Huma Abedin. They both knew that the state department had no access to Hillary's Private Server of which Huma in her continued employ after the New York U.S. Senate and 2008 Presidential Run with Hillary took up residence with her own Clinton-server-email address.
The AP Report is grossly covering tracks for Hillary Clinton, or is in the journalistic mire of the campaign's clutches though as the two paragraphs from the story relate:
"Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin said in a legal proceeding that Clinton did not want the private emails that she mixed in with State Department emails on her private computer server to be accessible to "anybody," according to transcripts released Wednesday."
"But Clinton's private server contained tens of thousands of work-related emails as well as private messages, and her decision to conduct both private and government business on her system meant that she kept control of both types of correspondence, effectively preventing her State Department correspondence from being archived by the agency and made available for public records requests. It was not until late 2014 - more than a year after Clinton left office - that the State Department learned that she held all of her email and requested that she turn over all work-related records.
This last underlined sentence is very important and is blatantly false as the Memorandum of March 17th, 2009 relates. In a Post Report filed yesterday on this Blog we read of the State Department's awareness in 2009 of the Private Server as well as it's location:
However, that lapse in the Associated Press's June 29th article might be minuscule to the giant revelation coming from the National Review June 29th article that reveals the titanic may have just had contact with the tip of the iceberg. That's the two billion dollar Clinton Foundation Charity. In fact in another story from National Review today we learn the State Department was aiding and abetting the very covert work of Clinton's Secretary of State Business and the Clinton Foundation Charity work!
"Citizens United is slated to receive all e-mails sent to and from Lona Valmoro, Clinton’s State Department scheduler, in the two-week periods before each of 14 international trips Clinton took during her four years in office. David Bossie, president of Citizens United, hopes to confirm suspicions that Clinton maintained an off-the-books schedule, meeting with Clinton Foundation donors on the taxpayer’s dime. “Citizens United wants to know how many overseas dinners Secretary Clinton attended with Clinton Foundation donors that didn’t make it on her schedule,” he says."
"Citizens United presented the judge with several pieces of evidence suggesting Valmoro deliberately struck from the official schedule a December 6, 2012 dinner in Dublin, Ireland with several Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign donors, organized by Teneo co-founder Declan Kelly. Though Valmoro was made aware of the Dublin meeting through an earlier e-mail chain, neither Clinton’s archived daily calendar nor her detailed official schedule make any note of it. Citizens United characterizes the State Department’s decision to go along with the filing as an acknowledgement that Clinton did, in fact, maintain a secret schedule. Collyer was apparently convinced, ordering the State Department on Wednesday to produce 500 pages of Valmoro’s e-mails by the end of August. An additional 500 pages will be released every four weeks from that date, until Citizens United obtains all messages relating to the 14 overseas trips specified."
THE CONSCIENCE CLAUSE The only saving grace Democrats may have now is what is called a Conscience Clause which is based on the Delegates in the Primaries of every State being released and not being bound to the Candidate of their State's Primary based on the lies and fabrications that were covered up by that Candidates own corruption in past circumstances and situations initiated by the Democratic Party National Convention's Rules Committee.
Delegates should/shall not be bound to any Candidate so entangled by criminal corruption in previous Government Office as privatizing entire offices of the United States Government. This is a Republic. We the People did not authorize the Secretary of State Office to be usurped by Hillary Clinton anymore than we authorized the Office of the President to be usurped by someone who is not a [natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.] U.S. Supreme Court ref: Minor v. Happersett. and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Importance of Natural Born Citizen on National Security
On December 15th, 2015 Democratic Party 2016 Presidential Candidate held a Meet N Greet the Candidate at the Main Library in Ogden, Utah from 6:30-8pm. This short 15 minute video highlighted some of the very important reasons that the Constitution's qualification of [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President really does affect American's Opportunity.
CRJ identifies some of the very relevant points and disagreements highlighted in the aspects of the natural born Citizen and Congress's ability to create a naturalize process by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4
Cody explains very clearly how the claim of anti-Birthers is false in that in the Nationals and Citizens at birth Title 8 Subsection 8 a-h is a 'naturalization act' of Congress , just as the 14th Amendment or any other Naturalization Act.
He explains that there are really only two types of Citizens- Natural Born Citizens and Naturalized Citizens and the glaring fact that "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" is not included in Title 8, Section 1401 a-h is a Congressional Declaration that the Act is not an articulation of [natural born Citizen] but rather only what it selects and purports to be in the title for Nationals and Citizens at birth not unlike the qualifications for Representatives and Senators in the U.S. Constitutions qualifications for those offices.
Anti-birthers point to as articulating [natural born Citizen] but the term is not mentioned in the Act nor is the definition [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as it is in Minor v. Happersett where the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court declared it was never doubted those born in the Country to its Citizens were themselves the natural born Citizens.
A Discussion is ongoing entitled BIRTHER LITIGANT SEES THE LIGHT where you can see many other comments like the one below made by CRJ.
Not at all. I’m simply pointing out that the same [naturalization process] which is Law by Congress affecting Senators Cruz , Rubio, and Obama effectively include Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jennifer Granholm in their naturalization process effectively also articulated by Congress.
8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code Notes Authorities (CFR) prev | next The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided , That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property; (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person; (d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States; (e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person; (f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States; (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided , That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and (h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States
Those becoming naturalized by 14th Amendment
Citizenship Through Naturalization Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
You have been a permanent resident for at least 5 years and meet all other eligibility requirements, please visit our Path to Citizenship page for more information. You have been a permanent resident for 3 years or more and meet all eligibility requirements to file as a spouse of a U.S. citizen, please visit our Naturalization for Spouses of U.S. Citizens page for more information. You have qualifying service in the U.S. armed forces and meet all other eligibility requirements. Visit the Military section of our website. Your child may qualify for naturalization if you are a U.S. citizen, the child was born outside the U.S., the child is currently residing outside the U.S., and all other eligibility requirements are met.
Clarifying that a-h are [natural born Citizens] while they are certified as such by an Act of Congress known as 8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth seems … Ridiculously Arbitrary
If there are two types 1- Citizens who are naturalized ( should include all in Title 8 as Nationals and Aliens)
2- Citizens who are natural born Citizens (Born in the U.S to Citizen Parents -free from any naturalization act) To me it truly is a wonderful, beautiful KEY representing the most lovely song I’ve ever heard that has in its melody the words, ” I Love You “. . it has been the secret of God’s Love for America.
This is why. . to forget it is indeed like ripping the heart out of my chest and pulling all of my tears out of my eyes.
It is the cruelest atrocity conceivable to leave as an inheritance to our children. . slavery … Subjects rather than Citizens … A Kingdom rather than a Partnershipped Country. It is the climate change of an entire Country as a Republic.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
The Qualifications for the Presidential Race Not the President's Race
[natural born Citizen]
The consideration given the Office of the President in the United States Constitution as a Story, is for all intensive purposes the Main Character. References to the Office of President in the Constitution Index Pamphlet of 46 pages number 13 pages to the closest reference coming in 2 or 3
The dangers of a Despot or Rogue Leader at the Head of the Government were by the careful considerations the biggest fear to guard against and also anticipate.
In the 1933 Ratification of Amendment XX we find..[ or if the President elect shall fail to qualify, ]. This proposes the most dreadful consequence of a Presidential Candidate falsifying or by other fraudulent means in the form of his identification, precipitating his election by the huge swath of the general public and still as a "President Elect" actually failing to qualify.
Who could imagine such a horrendous nightmare?
Isn't it interesting that its happened? Of course no one would dispute the requirement of Time of "35 years of age or older, if someone was 34.9 years old they are not 35 years old.
No one would dispute the 14 years a resident if only 13 years, 11 months had been accomplished.
We are left with the TIME it takes for two to become Citizens and have a child in the United States. Its a TIME FACTOR, not a race question. This time factor can also be interrupted and would then have to be restarted with the same goal or condition of Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
There are few things that make me ill more than to have regulated a TIME consideration given to the highest office of our Government as a Race related issue. That summation that the [natural born Citizen] qualification specific be about anything else but TIME regarded in the U.S. Constitution for the Office of President and Vice President is both demeaning and insulting pejorative not about Presidential Race, but about the President's Race.
The Main Stream Media needs to ask themselves a hard question: How does a "Time Period" equate to a Racism? That doesn't even make sense! Now what is the tag for someone who calls someone a Racist that actually is not? Actually Bigot might serve as one term if Racist itself doesn't apply.
Whatever the case, calling my Stand for the [natural born Citizen] qualification anything but a TEST-OF-TIME .. and literally meaning a period of time, really makes me ill.
The respect and love for the richness I find in every race and culture makes it sickening to me and I have done everything in my power to dispute the insulting narrative that race or culture guided me rather than simply a loyalty TIME period. The rationale of the entire qualification was that no foreigner occupy the Office of the President. Those with dual citizen ships are in fact considered foreigners to an office requiring a monogamous loyalty in citizenship ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
If it was understanding anyone asked or sought, I have in my blog made my concentrations and meanings abundantly clear.
An interesting parallel has been brought up by ANTI-birthers I think that peals a layer of the onion back in the case that they seek to destroy the Constitution and get around its precepts rather than Stand for it as a defense for our Nation.
The point was brought up in the context of the illegal immigrants. It was stated in a conversation on Obamaconspiracy.org Entitled "Confusing natural born Citizen", that Birthers bring up the facts that until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on it is left to the States in the comment:
[The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants]
My response was WELCOME to the World of Obama The difference between negative proof and positive proof
Welcome to the world of proving a negative, rather than positively proving.
#1 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: [speaking to a number of litigants contesting Obama's ineligibility] "You don't have Standing". This is not Obama proving anything, and is considered a "negative proof" for Obama.
ANTI-birther interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases! As if he had positively proven his qualifications. He hasn't. Not one court in the whole USA has actually heard or seen Obama prove he was qualified. They have listened to a whole lot of people who have tried to prove a negative and laughed at them because they couldn't do it, or in my case simply refused to hear the Case on Merits.
#2 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: Your case is wholly incredible or in other words frivolous ( This is what the lower courts said about mine at least not stating my case was dismissed because I didn't have standing, but was frivolous or wholly incredible. I'm not sure which is worse? Stating that a Presidential Candidate's Campaign is not hurt or damaged by one who is ineligible and wins the seat or office in conflict irregardless of LAW as is exactly the scenario anticipated by the U.S. Constitution's Amendment XX, stating in so many words that circumstances is frivolous in the face of evidence provided which shows a determination against the truth, against the facts, and against the law or stating the illegal immigrants are legal?
The ANTI-birther Interpretation: That's the REASON you don't get forma pauperis status.
The bizarre twist is they wish better treatment upon those who are not U.S. Citizens then those who are. It the greatest sense of twist this disavows Citizenship in the United States and regulates it to a cause of humanity or Citizenship in the World where in fact minorities, women, and individuals in cases such as same-sex marriage lose the respect and dignity of free speech, freedom of religion, the rights of privileges afforded to all Citizens equally, and many other rights including voting rights the U.S. Constitution actually upholds that a foreign citizenship in the world intends to trample.
#3 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: "Your forma pauperis status is denied in spite of two LOWER COURT's agreeing in the same year, by a Form asking for Yearly Income Reports that was granted and is not disputed.
ANTI-birther interpretation: 1) If your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can't point to any Case Law stating the Forma Pauperis Yearly Report Form is good for a Year.
This is like stating the reasons the poor are poor is basically their fault and of no circumstance out of their realm of choices or circumstances including death, job loss, health, accident, divorce, child custody disputes, and contract agreements abandoned by partners that inflicted a state of poverty.
One true aspect of the absurdity relied upon by ANTI -birthers is that they are somehow compassionate people in the act of opening the door for strangers on one hand and watching their family be slaughtered rather then defending their own family on the other. It might be subject to debate by those being slaughtered verses the ones coming in the front door with enthusiastic welcome who did the slaughtering.
Our U.S. Constitution is an agreement of terms. The idiotic reasoning tactics of ANTI-birthers are at least in perfect parallel with the derelictic deductive reasoning skills and example stating the qualification for President is the same for those in 1787 as it is for those in 2016 when the Constitution states very plainly in Article II, Section 1. C-5 differently:
1) [natural born Citizen]
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the [Adoption of this Constitution]
and then providing absolutely no distinction for the [two requisites].
To state you understand perfectly Obama has occupied an office he has never proven he is qualified for is exactly in line with the [negative proof] hurdle that Anti-Birthers are complaining about. I do understand their frustration seeing Obama occupy an office he was not, is not, never will be qualified to hold based on the TIME factor considered necessary for both parents to be U.S. Citizens and have a child in the United States jurisdiction maintaining the loyalty for, until 35 years and at least 14 years being a resident distinct from U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.
I have even fought for the frustration of the ANTI - birthers hoping the U.S. Supreme Court would hold; there has not been a dispute between Presidential Candidates in the Office of the President's distinct and unique qualification of [natural born Citizen] rather then allow Obama to be dis proven a qualified candidate without the benefit and access to documentation Obama has sealed; or at least attending to the documentation Obama by his own hand has released showing his father was never a U.S. Citizen in fact starting the Time demanded for the Office of President with Obama's heirs. If Obama and his wife are Citizens their children would be natural born Citizens qualified for President in the Time Consideration.
ITS ABOUT "TIME" WATCH
This has been the motivation for my Campaign to release the incredibly jeweled, solar paneled,motorized, computerized, glow in the dark limited edition CODY ROBERT JUDY BLUE WATCH. The only watch that allows your finger into Time, because its all about time.
The Cody Robert Judy Blue Watch
$1,000,000.00 secures yours in this Limited Edition
American Treasure
We are incredibly excited about this WATCH! You have just never seen anything like it in the world! This watch encapsulates the epiphany of the rare,rich and valuable Principle of Transparency, our U.S. Constitution's natural born Citizen clause has afforded our Nation's People in a greater goodness and mercy even than any particular Church or Religion I know. Priced reasonably for the many many Billionaires who would really love to show their gratitude for the opportunity America has provided them, (rather than have their work confiscated by the Government), in supporting the U.S. Constitution we here at the Cody Robert Judy Today for a Better America Tomorrow are excited to offer this limited Collection of 200 Watches at One Million Dollars Each! Some Campaigns sell hats, we do to, but we wanted something very very special that set our Campaign apart from just hats, and gave you the opportunity to support a campaign that is supporting the U.S. Constitution like no other in America!
What Church has not held Priesthood for Men only? What Church has not held the healing properties of Priesthood away from minorities and women to vote in the Church? What Church has held equality in the privilege of marriage and Parenting to all Citizens equally? Of course you are free to choose which one, but understand unequivocally it is by the U.S. Constitution that you can choose.
Of course it is the right of the Churches to discriminate according to their beliefs. We adopt that in the freedom of religions, but our Blessed U.S. Constitution when we see it in the light it was meant to be seen in has afforded the voting rights to minorities,women, and the privileges of all Citizens afforded to all Citizens.
While everyone is free to bash and trash each others religions explaining why they think theirs is the truest one, there still remains a respect and honor of even that right afforded by our U.S. Constitution that I love and believe we here in America should celebrate in our recognized diversity.
There are many different religions in the United States who believe with all their hearts America is going to be judged for this Love and Mercy the same way the Islamic Republic of Iran is going to be judged or China, or Russia or any other Nation.
This of course is a denial of the very reasons God set America as the United States apart in such a diversity and is showing the world what great blessings might be attained in the release of information, technology and an unparalleled Standard of Liberty and Freedom in the world with innovation, attraction, ingenuity, entrepreneurial diverse inspiration we have called uniquely American excellence. .. Like this WATCH you have never seen is so unique and rare in the World.
We are indeed held to a higher standard also of this kind of Love and Mercy. We find power as a Nation with great gratitude in the cooperation amongst our fellow man, much more than we experience a loss of power in a belief of superiority.
While many religions speak against freedom of speech, we welcome it. While many religions speak against women's rights, we welcome it. While many religions speak against minority rights, we welcome them. However, that is not at the expense of suffering the protections afforded in our U.S. Constitution to be secure in our Homes and in our Property secured to us in our 4th Amendment and 5th Amendments that includes "public danger".
Many have suggested it was "not what America was about in a wise protection of our U.S. Citizens from public danger in the potential of importing terrorism and called for a STOP when it come to assuring a rigorous vetting process for refugees or immigrants. Where shall 72% of America's men go if terrorism strikes in our United States of America? Shall we go to Europe or Africa or Russia or China? How about Syria? NO! We shall Stay in America fighting for the Law and our Country.
I have proposed that any Refugee of course be drafted into the same force that fights for freedom in their land in our land. In other words, how different are the circumstances of fighting for your own land then fighting for America? Are they prepared to meet the requirements of America?
If you come to America you are expected to fight for America, adopt America's principles afforded to those who are gay, minority, or female. If you cannot do that with a pledge it doesn't matter what religion you are, you will be in conflict with America's Principles under our U.S. Constitution. If you are a refugee in America and you are drafted in the Military and sent to the front lines to fight in Syria how much greater will be your victory in death fighting for Freedom and Liberty?
This might be the reason Obama wants to welcome you? Perhaps he wishes to strengthen our military presents in Syria with you as a soldier for America fighting on the front lines of Syria against ISIS and being shot for treason if you turn around in cowardice? Perhaps he wants to tax you 80% of income for 10 years if you do not want to serve for 5 years in the Military to repay to the tax payer the refugee funds of $65,000 per year?
Obama will not be around in the Office of the President much longer so there is a good chance that what you think the circumstances are of coming to America are not what the circumstances will be in a very short time.
America will not be compromised. We will not compromise our rights, those rights of women, those rights of minorities, those rights of the LGBT citizens are protected here under laws and those acting outside our laws are indeed punished according to our criminal codes. The Government has the responsibility to assure as much as possible that we maintain a safe and secure America with the rights and justice for all held as a very high Standard. This is why I have asked the Governors of the United States to join together in insisting our U.S. Constitution be upheld in the Office of the President. Any person unlawfully occupying the Office of the President must be stopped. This is a protection and a defense of the public safety. Now may God Bless you and may God Bless America in the mighty terror of our U.S. Constitution that grips the hearts and souls making weak the knees, sinews, and joints of traitors and tyrants fearing the protections of a God they know not, but whom they shall meet who is the Founder and the Framer of our United States of America.
Cody Robert Judy
The Comment Section in reference to this article are copied below.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
.D. Reed [..(Democrats)…come off as transparent hypocrisy given the amount of ridicule Democrats and liberals have (justifiably) rained on birthers]
Justified Ridicule = The saddest tactic of lawlessness being correct in Order ie. The devil throws a raging temper-tantrum in what will never be Heaven. His fight in vain. For he craves the Order of Heaven in the Chaos of his habitation. Not even the devil likes Hell. All desire heaven.
@Pete [Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).1. The “general consensus” of real legal scholars is that Ted Cruz is eligible.]
Noticing the difference in Mr. Donald Trump and the @realdonaltrump. I’m wondering why he doesn’t change his name to Mr. Real Donald Trump?
I suppose he didn’t have enough money to buy from others his own name? The draft of placing [real] seems pretty close to phoney when it comes to [Legal].
Interesting that Legal Scholars do agree that the possibility of having an [illegal] person in the Office of President [elected] but failing to Qualify exist.
This would be the quintistoxic shock to MainStream Media , especially if the illegal one was a Democrat. Maybe not so much shock of Republican.
1933 Ratification of Amendment XX. …[ or if the President elect shall have failed to Qualify, ]
Isn’t it interesting that it’s happened? Of course no one would dispute the requirement of TIME of 35 years old if someone was 34.9 years old, they are not 35. No one would dispute the 14 years a resident if only 13 years, 11 months had been accomplished.
We are left with the TIME it takes for two to become Citizens and have a child in the United States. Its a TIME FACTOR not a race question.
People always want to rush to get some place they are not. Its human nature to get on the freeway and drive somewhere as fast as the speed limit allows.
There are a few things that make me ill. I’ve got a pretty good cast iron stomach. Some say it’s because I consume the BIG JARS of sliced jalapeno peppers (about 1 every two weeks). . some say it’s because I like hot women, ( beauty is in the eye of the beholder).
Whatever the case, calling my stand for the [natural born Citizen] qualification anything but a TEST-of-Time , simply a period of TIME, really makes me ill.
The respect and love for the richness I find in every race and culture makes it thus for me.
I certainly have done all I can and will continue to do all I can to bring this TRUTH to light.
Interesting that Legal Scholars do agree that the possibility of having an [illegal] person in the Office of President [elected] but failing to Qualify exist.
If an unqualified person ever were to be elected president, it would be up to Congress to remedy it.
This would be the quintistoxic shock to MainStream Media
Quintistoxic? People might take you more seriously if you used real words.
I certainly have done all I can and will continue to do all I can to bring this TRUTH to light.
You wouldn’t know the truth if you tripped over it.
Let’s face the facts. So few people care about your quixotic efforts to legitimize your specious “two citizen parents” argument that you couldn’t even raise enough money to pay your SCOTUS filing fee and printing expenses. Your campaign for president is a farce. You are not going to be on the ballot in a single state and it is unlikely that anyone outside of your immediate family would vote for you. Your book is #9,757,126 in sales at Amazon.
You are still young enough to do something positive with your life, instead of spending all of your time blogging and tweeting nonsense.
Cody Robert JudyThank You for caring Rickey. I’m 49.11 years old.. That’s close enough to 50 to make my own words and let you figure them out.
It’s true, I still have time to become a U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose qualification, as Justice Thomas admitted is not quite as rigorous, far more lengthy in tenure, and does not require one to be [natural born Citizen] ie. “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu6OiTiua08 Of course blogging and tweeting are very much a part of free speech. Something our Constitution is an advocate for but also something Madame Secretary HRC is fuming about:
Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. They go from:
The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on this specific issue, therefore there’s still a question.
To: The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled against me, therefore my interpretation is the right one.
As an example, take a look at what the right wing has done with the question of citizenship of illegal immigrants. They started by stating that the Supreme Court hasn’t specifically ruled that the children of illegal immigrants are U.S. Citizens (they have, but we’ll get into that later).
Then they went to that illegal immigrants are not covered under the 14th Amendment (they are), and their children are not really citizens.
@ dunstvangeet
[Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. ]
Welcome to the world of proving a negative, rather than positively proving.
ie. Court: “You don’t have Standing”
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases!
ie. Court: “You case is Wholly Incredible”
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: That’s the reason you don’t get forma pauperis status
ie. Court: “Your forma pauperis status is denied in spite of two LOWER COURT’S agreeing in the same year by a form asking for YEARLY INCOME REPORT that it’s granted.
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: 1) IF your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can’t point to any Case Law stating the Forma PAUPERIS [Yearly] Report Form is good for a Year.
The only thing true about these idiotic reasoning tactics is they are similar to the lack of deductive reasoning skills and example stating the qualification for President is the same for those in 1787 as it is for those in 2016 when the Constitution States very plainly in Article II, Section 1, C-5 differently:
1) [natural born Citizen]
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the Adoption of this Constitution
and then said example provides no distinction for the two requisites.
To state you understand perfectly Obama has occupied an office he has never proven that he is qualified for is exactly in line with the negative proof hurdle your complaining about.
I do understand your frustration and I have done everything I could to relieve that frustration.
[Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. ]
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases!
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: That’s the reason you don’t get forma pauperis status
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: 1) IF your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can’t point to any Case Law stating the Forma PAUPERIS [Yearly] Report Form is good for a Year.
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the Adoption of this Constitution