MONEY, POWER, and TRUTH in CONSPIRACY - The President's Day Super Bowl - WINNERS & LOSERS

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email

MONEY, POWER, and TRUTH in CONSPIRACY 

The President's Day Bowl - WINNERS & LOSERS
Does Crime Pay?

Hillary Clinton on December 8th, 2016 emerged from the cataclysmic shock of her loss in the 2016 Election that transcended every major Main Stream Media (MSM) forecast in the United States of America and vocalized the strident collapse in the emergence of a new epidemic of fake news and conspiracy that demanded the First Amendment be collapsed:

“The epidemic of malicious fake news and false propaganda that flooded social media over the past year — it’s now clear that so-called fake news can have real world consequences,” Clinton said. “This isn’t about politics or bipartisanship. Lives are at risk.”Clinton called for Congress to pass legislation to stop it and for tech moguls in Silicon Valley to continue searching for a way to block it from entering readers’ Facebook and Twitter feeds.

This signaled a focused national attention upon the subverted Public Attention; stolen from MSM! - a theft had taken place on truth. The power and money once secure was gone, and with it the Trust. No, the MSM hadn't been 'wrong' themselves but a theft of accountability had sprung upon the MSM like a tactical strike unforeseen.

Among the losers of the MSM and the declared winners pointed to by Mrs. Clinton, responsibly an intensive investigation of the new KINGS OF CONSPIRACY on the Right and Left must be searched out from behind the stage and proven in:

 The PRESIDENT'S DAY SUPER BOWL

The Teams

 The BIRTHERS v. THE ANTI-BIRTHERS 

ANTI-BIRTHER CONSPIRATOR

Mr. Keven Davidson -self anointed "Dr. Conspiracy" at Obamaconspiracy.org jumped upon President Donald J. Trump's assertion that Barack Obama was born in the Unites States as a fundamental reversal of teams- meaning President Trump abandoned Birthers and the evidence of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse delivered December 15,2016, just 7 days after Mrs. Clinton's announcement in the scandalous epidemic of Conspiracy & Propaganda.


Conclusion Post - Obamaconspiracy.org

" So ultimately, who won? “Birther” is now a term of derision in the English vocabulary. Barack Obama was elected twice and served two full terms. He was not impeached. There were no Congressional investigations of his identity documents. His approval rating upon leaving office is phenomenal. Birthers lost 226 lawsuits. Still, the country took a turn for the crazy over the last 8 years. A turncoat Birther was even elected president. I think it’s too soon to count winners and losers."

KEVIN DAVIDSON & ALVIN ONAKA 2007-2008- 2011 CONNECTION

PETER BOYLES SHOW Feb 27, 2015 beginning at 10minutes 

Categorizing Mr. Davidson as simply a defender of the Constitution and in such a defender of Obama's eligibility as a U.S. President in the face of the evidence the Cold Case Posse brought out is possible, however begins to really unravel when you account for a recent post of Mr. Davidson's encouraging a different line of attack upon President Trump for impeachment that undoubtedly places President Trump's successes of business in the past as a mark of mental and incapacitating incompetence. 

This takes-a-toll on the advancement of Obama as an eligible person under the U.S. Constitution's qualification that anyone serving in the Office of the President be a {Citizen} [at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution] or a {natural born Citizen} thereafter- defined as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents spiriting an American Allegiance by soil and parents, to simply a more realistic partisan defense for Obama.

BIRTHER CONSPIRATOR

The underground MSM collapse can most notably be seen with the advancement of INFOWARS own CEO Alex Jones.

Published December 22nd, 2016, is the Report at INFOWARS that "Case Closed! Trump Was Right. Obama's Birth Certificate A Fake"

So how can both Conspiracy Theorist be right? Mr. Jones says Trump was right all a long and Obama's birth certificate was a Fake, while Mr. Davidson says Trump is a Turn-Coat-Birther admitting Obama was born in the United States? How can President Trump who is now in the White House have both stories be true?

Well that answer might become more clear in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) with a Presidential Candidate who challenged both Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama since 2008 running for President himself in 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Evidence from two different criminal forensic investigation units, both claiming similar circumstances in the high stakes Fraud and Forgery Claim of Barack Obama's identity document put forth as an Original to the American Public in 2011, nearly 50 months after Obama declared his intent to run for President, has been submitted to the Federal Court in a Motion for Relief of Judgement declaring the case frivolous with the Cold Case Posse Presser and 9 Points of Forgery as factual evidence.

The 30 Day dispositive motion period for the Defense named in Barack Obama and OFA Organization for Action as well the DNC Democratic National Committee ends this coming week February 24th with the Motion being filed January 26th, 2017. 

A Notice for Judgement will be filed than and the Court generally will rule on the Motion within a ten day period. The Judge will weigh factual evidence produced with the tenants of harm upon the Plaintiff with standing in the balances of criminal and civil penalties in all the appearances of wrong doing.

CRJ 

Cody Robert Judy

-------------------

MOTION BEFORE THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT (Utah Division)

A MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT or to REOPEN the Case due to the new evidence provided by a law enforcement investigation Cold Case Posse unit deputized under Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa Country AZ provided the evidence that Obama's long form birth certificate is a Fabricated Forgery, not an original, with the use of Johanna Ah'Nees identity birth certificate and was only recently released and available for criminal consideration by the Judicial Branch.

The transition of power was afforded safely in 2016, but the usurpation tentacles of Obama run much deeper than just eight years. If the Trump Administration and the Justice Department continue to refuse to deal with Obama's Constitutional Ineligibility and the Cost yesterday, today, and in the Future, they are simply allowing themselves to be cornered by those who have profited off the crimes of the Obama Administration and at the same time committing themselves to be in Order of the Constitution. It in affect allows those who are anti-american the conundrum of  retaining their cake and eating it to.


Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

CRJ

BREAKING REPORT: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN POLITICAL SCRIMMAGE ROUNDTABLE

BREAKING REPORT:

 NATURAL BORN CITIZEN POLITICAL SCRIMMAGE ROUNDTABLE

What do you get when the Leading Obama Conspiracy Doctor, Reality Check Radio, a Former Cold Case Posse Investigator, and a Presidential Candidate with U.S. Supreme Court Cases under his belt get together on a ROUND TABLE Discussion? 

Well, "Shake N' Bake", THAT just happened!

I came on with a question for Doc Conspiracy (Kevin Davidson) at about the 90 Minute mark which was about the fourth quarter (30 minutes left) and the Show went two 15 Minute OVER TIMES!

The below link does allow you to skip to any particular time. I would like to transcribe the discussion but am limited to time right now, my comment below reflects my general feelings about the round table.

SKIP ON DOWN this Post to [THE POLITICAL ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION] if you'd like to give a Listen Now.

THOUGHTS on THE ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSION

CRJ HIGHLIGHTED COMMENT REFLECTS THE
SENTIMENT THAT THE SCOTUS HAS NOT HEARD A CASE
REGARDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE OF THE
CONSTITUTION IN ITS HISTORY AND REGULATES PRECEDENT
TO CASES HEARD OVER CITIZENSHIP

The outrage of Political Punitive indifference the U.S. Supreme Court has demonstrated is over now three Presidential Election cycles, MILLIONS of Votes, BILLIONS OF Dollars regulating [natural born Citizen] to precedent cases of [Citizen] instead of giving an ear to a unique aspect of our Constitution between Presidential Candidates with Standing for the Office of the President. That's nothing to be remembered in U.S. History over.

The current SCOTUS Court has thus far refused to hear a Case on the merits between Presidential Candidates. I feel this is a huge dis-service to the General Public.

In the Round-Table Discussion I made clear that we should not expect Republicans or Democrats in Congress, for the most part, to entertain this discussion mostly because of the partnership that was formed between many Leaders in the Congress at the time, three of which constituted the Major Candidates for the last three election cycles in Sen. Obama, Sen. Clinton, and Sen. McCain.

As I wrote in my Certiorari included with the Link the tragedy of that is the U.S. Supreme Court is not supposed to be serving Republicans or Democrats per se by Party over Principle. The U.S. Supreme Court is suppose to be concerned more with political neutrality or very important independents from the political fray.

With that Principle in mind, we see that remaining 'silent' on the [natural born Citizen] for the Court is in essence abandoning that part of the Constitution in a 'destructive but controlled demolition' much more than respecting the 'political doctrine question' Doc referred to in the discussion.

The two Cases referred heavily to as [Precedent Cases] in the ROUND TABLE were for myself *1Minor v. Happersett and for Doc- Mr. Davidson
*2 United States v. Wong Kim Ark . Both of these cases were about establishing 'Citizenship" or about established 'Citizenship'. Neither of the Cases involved any Presidential Candidates or involved as a focus or cross-hair [natural born Citizenship] in regards specifically to the qualifications referred to the Offices of President and Vice President as distinct and unique from the Representatives and Senators.

*1The Minor v. Happersett ruling was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court readily accepted that Minor was a citizen of the United States, but it held that the constitutionally protected privileges of citizenship did not include the right to vote.

*2 United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicileand residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen.^[1] This decision established an important precedent in its interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

To assimilate the discussion of relativity in those two cases as the 'closest thing we have to a 'Precedent Case' on a Candidate Qualification specific and unique for the two highest offices is about as disrespectful to the Constitution in my humble opinion as you could possible get. This should outrage America!

Adding further insult to injury, if you have read my last two Post here, and here,  you will know that the U.S. Supreme Court considers my case "Closed" due to insufficient funds. Its true, after millions of votes and billions of dollars in America's Presidential Election, we don't have the funds to get the

Court to administer Justice to us in our Presidential Elections.

My Motion to proceed in Forma Pauperis was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. These Motions are generally filled out by litigants who do not have enough money to pay the Court Cost.

The Federal PDF Form is provided by the Court and generally include information an Applicant must provide for a Year.

That understood the U.S. Supreme Court received mine that has been GRANTED by the two lower Courts, including the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Upon the same review in basic certainty of income, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the exact same Motion in 2012 also. It is therefore seen as a 'punitive measure' upon the poor for the U.S. Supreme Court not to grant my MOTION TO PROCEED, upheld in three Courts before. It is not a jump to conclusion to state that this was a trick up the sleeve of the Court that really should enrage Americans in the interest of JUSTICE FOR ALL.

It is also not a far gone conclusion to state that when you are 'very close' to success the door slams shut for erratic, nefarious, and radically extreme reasons. Of course the SCOTUS can do what the want under the guidelines of 'Good Behavior'. Outside of those measures an "Impeachment" process exist for 'Bad Behavior' and that is orchestrated through the U.S. House of Representatives as has been indicated in the proposed RESOLUTION sent to the House of Representatives, including Trey Gowdy conducting the Benghazi Hearings now in Congress, by hundreds of Citizens.

  Another point was brought up in the discussion in which I deferred I had not thoroughly read. That was the Tribe Olsen Opinion. I referred to Gabriel J. Chin's argument which I had used in Judy v. McCain, and this rebuttal was in fact correct. The Tribe-Olsen Opinion stands on the ground of 'citizen' grounds of the Wong Kim Ark decision referred to above. It rest on the laurels that the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution exist outside of the States regardless of apposing jurisdictional claims which in my opinion is grotesque and prevalent of foreign disrespect.

If you look closely at motive for these pretended Constitutional Scholars you come up with a constant theme of character rather and over principle. The summary is that it robs Principle, and is instructional of a bear Constitutional Cupboard. The Tribe Olsen opinion was written by 1 Republican for McCain and 1 Democrat for Barack Obama. There you go.., those are the 'characters' twitching like devils to escape the 'Principle' of 'natural born Citizen' ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The exact same thing happened when the 2016 Year Presidential Cycle begin with U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and two former Solicitor Generals of different administrations advocating 'character' over 'principle'. ON THE MEANING OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN was created ,authored and featured as a Harvard Review by Neil Katyal and Paul Clement, and essentially further tears the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President down to include only the exclusion of someone born outside the United States to foreign parents. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's name is even mentioned specifically in what they term a 'unbiased opinion'.

Motivation Motivation Motivation.. my Legal Actions in Civil Court have demonstrated an integrity to the 'motivation' in the first place ascertaining that [natural born Citizen] was included as a protection in the interest of our national security regardless of [character], and predicated upon [principle]. If that rubs someones nose wrong, so be it.

The entire purpose in my scholarly opinion and standing as a Presidential Candidate in now three general elections for the Office of President is that the term [natural born Citizen] used in the Constitution's Article II, Section I, Clause 5 was predicated upon as a key that could not be unlocked for a period of time that consisted of two generations.

This completely eliminates first generation Americans in either direction. Meaning, you can earn it and you can lose it. First Generation Americans such as those legally immigrating to the United States after becoming U.S. Citizens could have children who were then considered [natural born Citizen] eligible for the Office of President.  In reverse, a [natural born Citizen] could marry a foreigner and their child would not be a [natural born Citizen] based on the dual citizenship earned from both the father and the mother. Those born in the U.S. known as anchor babies were indeed [citizens] but and their children would then be the second generation considered to be [natural born Citizens] eligible for the Office of President or Vice President.

What this does is eliminate any possibility of a foreigner assimilating to the Office of the President that has any allegiance by a Parent or by a Place of non-jurisdiction considered outside of the U.S. Constitution or the States. In the ROUND TABLE discussion you heard that Hawaii was a territory until 1958 and if Obama would have been born in that year rather then after Hawaii became a State in 1959 he would not have been eligible. I agreed with this., but Brian the author of the comment refuted his own Tribe Olsen representation as scholarly with the example.

Doc and RC kind of ganged up on me regarding the "Foreign Influence" remark I made regarding John Jay's letter to General George Washington. John Jay was to become the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and of course General Washington became our First U.S. President.

There is a constant barrage against those serving as our first presidents from either not being born in the U.S. or for having a foreign Parent. The Constitution itself left leeway for that in what we commonly refer to as the grandfather clause. Many people strongly disagree with the exemption of those who were the Revolutionist, but logic would have that those fighting for what would be the U.S. Constitution could not possible have been born in the United States under the authority and jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution.

Thus, firmly, our Founders agreed a necessary authority was needed to grant those fighting in the Revolution a path towards the Office of the President including everyone at the time. They articulated it very well in stating in Article II, Section I, Clause 5, that "Citizen" was the necessary  requirement for those at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. This is made very clear in the Constitutional Reckoning 2 Minute Video.

Finally, as I entertain the honor and dignity of those who have sacrificed their egos, reputations, time, talent,families, even their blood, and body parts for our National Security in the United States of America, I cannot consider if I was not 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' advocating by some kind of envious, jealous, or prideful remark that constituted those upholding the opportunity for our children as doing so on the basis of racism, bigotry, or unethical standards contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land.

Our U.S. History is a Final Notice- and of our 43 U.S. Presidents thus far Chester Arthur remains along with Barack Obama the only one's characterized outside the bounds of the U.S. Constitutions requirements for the designated times of which they lived. Meaning the requirement for those serving after the Revolution was[Citizen], those after [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

Chester Arthur 1881-1885 never was elected as President, but he was next in line as President Garfield was assassinated.

Arthur warded off offense to his not being qualified by lying about his family origins. Recent revelations of a 2008 investigation indicate his father did not naturalize as a U.S. Citizen until Arthur was 14 years old.

Barack Obama is the only other person allowed to occupy the Office of the President without merit of the established criteria of [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama's very public release of his own long form birth Certificate bears out that his father was not a U.S. Citizen at the time of Barack Obama's birth. This certainly is not a reflection of the 'Citizen' status Obama may have, but that status for the Office of the President has long since expired as Obama was not a U.S. Citizen at the time of the Adoption of the U.S. Constitution.

The threat of course to our National Security for this security breach is not simply a cover-up of Obama about his own identification, but wholly will be looked upon in the anal of history in the big picture of U.S. Debt skyrocketing 10 Trillion under Obama's watch, U.S. Healthcare skyrocketing consuming 1/5 of GDP, and of course the U.S. foreign invasion of uncommitted illegal aliens which may ultimately cost America a Civil War and many thousands even millions of lives lost.

 As my U.S. Supreme Court Case 14-9396 will be reflected upon in Historical Records and Archived, the fraud was known and the deeds such as Rep. Nancy Pelosi dictating two separate certification records one to the 49 States and one to Hawaii were just simple steps that were very evident to cover up the understood perpetuation of fraud upon the American Public. Let me go on record as saying "I told you so" is the poorest commentary of being right I could possible conceive of, and one which I do not care for.

The Future will not hold me absent its revelations of death and destruction and I shall not find one twitch of satisfaction. It was announced today that Obamacare was increasing its cost by 17 to 42 %, that's just the beginning. IT IS the job of the Future to convince most Americans of this, I have done all I could at every step of the way and pray daily that our U.S. Constitution might be upheld and that God might forgive us our trespasses and somehow, someway, make things right with the least amount of punitive action possible we have brought upon ourselves. I just cannot bring myself to think about this any other way being involved with as I have.

Thank You! May God Bless You America, forgive what so many could not have known, and focus upon those who were Responsible. May God punish the wicked and hold guiltless the innocent in remembrance of Psalms 58 and the righteous will say, "There is indeed a God that Judges the World".

Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

THE POLITICAL ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION

Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with RCRadio on BlogTalkRadio with Reality Check on BlogTalkRadio

My Comment AT OBAMACONSPIRACY.ORG about the show :

@RC [Thanks again Doc. Also thanks to Brian Reilly and CRJ who called. We went past the two hour streaming limit but the discussion should be in the archive version. We had a discussion with CRJ and about his case and the definition of NBC.]

It was a real pleasure to be in that Round Table Discussion agreeing to disagree.

As I thought about it this morning I appreciated you letting me come on the show. Things like that ROUND TABLE are EPIC and the Discussion Healthy.

Kevin Davidson AKA Doctor Conspiracy (episode in case you missed it)

Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with wheresobamasbirthcertificateXcom on BlogTalkRadio

Like Doc said about his experience in WOBC (wheresobamasbirthcertificate.org) there was one point I regretted not saying as we disagreed on “Precedent Case”

And that would have been to emphasize more the reality that the SCOTUS has not had a Discussion on “natural born Citizen” where it Counts – Between TWO PRESIDENTIAL Candidates.

Thus our Campaigns are regulated by Cases considering “Citizen” and not “natural born Citizen”

I do wish the SCOTUS had enough respect for the Constitution to understand the slight. (smile)

You, Doc,Brian, and myself really engaged in a conversation that should be had in the U.S. Supreme Court and broadcast on Prime Time. . if you just for one minute thought about the hundreds of millions of Votes and Billions of dollars that have gone into the ’08. ’12., and now ’16 Presidential Elections. . that’s an easy up.

If the SCOTUS could not be juiced up by THAT I’d have to say they are in the same condition as the majority of Certs that hit their desk .. D.O.A or Deadlisted.

On a side note:

You and Doc are so talented with your voices. I mean REALLY good! Your both amazingly articulate, distinct, and unique and PRIME TIME is missing out.

Doc’s Voice could sell Beef to Cows. Sam Elliot better watch out , because he could lose his dinner over that voice.

You RC really should be MC’n Bloomberg TV or some other high profile show , with your quick wit, intelligence, and all around savvy.

REALLY was my honor in the Discussion with you guys and with Brian Reilly (who worked on the CCP). . whose sincere desire to look for truth I took as genuine.

You know I thought this morning “America’s Got Great Talent”

Wouldn’t it be something if the best of the best in forensics, in Congress, in Court, in Politics, got together in Principle for the Truth?

Then I thought .., “Well, that was what the great experience and experiment the USA was all about in the first place with the Freedom and Liberty to do it. ”

You know TODAY that Round Table Discussion at Prime Time would cost millions of dollars. . and the Value would be exponentially higher.

I guess we missed the Pro Salary Cap, but it was a great Scrimmage.

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016

CRJTwitter

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

BREAKING: Congress feeling the Heat to open a Select Committee on Obama's Qualifications JUDGE on S.S.#

Congress feeling the Heat to open a Select Committee on Obama's Qualifications

(Update Inserted Under [Update 1]
(Update 2 May 15th,2014 The Post and Email Interview w Miki Booth

Benghazi was thought to be over after Congress concluded its investigations and we heard former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton embark "What difference does it make now", however Judicial Watch's FOIA law suit uncovered emails Congress could not get detailing the specific course of misdirection to the public. Could the same thing be happening with the Constitutional Crisis we as a Nation are facing with Obama's Identity scandal and the authorized power we the people have given to the Executive Branch only on on condition of a qualified person in the Office of the President? New evidence points in that direction and its starting to pour out very fast!

A Maryland Judge has ordered that the Social Security Administration hand over all of its evidence about Obama's social security number not being exclusive. As reported by American Overlook with 103,616 shares Dec 2013, The number identifies with a man named Harrison Bounel of Connecticut, but the Social Security Administration Judge Hollander has now made that request to the Social Security Department. The number Obama has been using identifies with a man named Harrison Bounel of Connecticut, but Obama has never lived in Connecticut. May 12,2014- As reported by Orly Taitz handling this case there is still no word yet regarding the Judge's decision.

The Media has not consider Obama's social security number to be a big deal, however, the importance of this links directly to what people who do NOT have a genuine birth certificate have to do in the commission of committing the crime of creating a false identity. Social Security numbers are not handed out to anyone without a genuine birth certificate.

Obama's long form b.c. fabrication as has been articulated by the Cold Case Posse 32 month investigation was made not to long ago. Judge Hollander has subpoenaed all documents from the Social Security Administration that relate to Bounel’s, or Obama’s, Social Security number. When the social security number was issued and on what evidence it was issued with is of grave importance. The number may not have been issued by the Social Security Department at all and may have simply been discovered as one that had no pay-outs and so was viable in transient.

Additionally in the Birther Breaking News an Affidavit previously kept under wraps has been un-sealed at the United States Supreme Court level in a case which asks if a Grand Jury can be intentionally manipulated out of hearing evidence on the commission of a crime, especially when it presents an embarrassment to the Office of the President.

New Blaze reported a story "The Vogt Affidavit Names Suspected Birth Certificate Forgers" "I believe Johanna Ah'nee is the forger of the Obama [Certificate of Live Birth] as well other birth certificates created to cover up the first mistake," Vogt said. The Bellevue, Washington document imaging expert also adds that he intends to show "that Johanna most likely knew Barack Obama II when they were kids in Hawaii."

Could the signature of the forger actually have be the graffiti left on Obama's long form fabrication? Something I actually found kind of fascinating was that what was once just thought to be a "smiley face" on the long form fabrication Obama presented to the White House Press Core on April 27th 2011 could be a signature initials?

Vogt, the owner of Archive Index systems in Bellevue, Washington in a forty-eight page affidavit along with other supporting material laid out his preface that he believes Johanna Ah'Nee Randolph is the forger of the original certificate of live birth along with other birth certificates released by the Nation's chief executive and that Kevin Davidson who runs the website obamaconspriracy.org did the research for the document. Also without surprise in the document to eligibility activists is that Vogt also declares Hawaii Register Alvin Onaka and Former and now deceased Hawaii Director of Public Health Loretta Fuddy to be involved.


While I am not a graphic expert and have relied on others for that I did go to the White House post of Obama's long form b.c. post and down load the image which I blew up and sure enough that smiley face is an "E" inside the first letter of the Registrar's name "A". Inside the "A" of Alvin is an "E" which I suppose put together would be short for "Ah'Nee". After seeing it, I felt really stupid that I thought it was a smiley face before. lol

Now how did I know to evan do that? Well, it came from the lively discussion that Vogt, whose United States Supreme Court affidavit was unsealed, had with Miki Booth which was printed at the Birther Report

Miki Booth responds: doug vogt is a f***ing idiot!! He's gonna get his ass sued. My friend Johanna had nothing to do with this except to give her birth certificate to me to give to Dr. Corsi and Mike Zullo. vogt was jealous not being privy to the investigation and figured we were hiding something because we wouldn't share with him. [.] Source.


"Doug Vogt responds To Miki Booth, First of all you can’t sue me for what I have in the sealed affidavit. I am reporting a crime and reported it to the authorities listed in the two Misprision laws. You are exempt from libel and slander laws if you are reporting a crime to the authorities. I had to unseal the affidavit to the Supreme Court because the Judges would not consider the evidence presented within if it was sealed. A reporter is the one who made my affidavit public. I only wanted the Judges to read it. The affidavit just presents the evidence Paul and I discovered after we examined the two birth certificates you freely gave Jerome Corsi. Regarding Johanna, Dr. Corsi told me that he met her at his hotel in mid May 2011 in Honolulu where she freely handed over her COLB for him to have for his investigation. She also gave a photo copy to Orly Taitz when they met at the airport in 2011. The facts of what we found speak for themselves. I don’t have to go beyond her certificate number to show hers is a forgery. The 9 and 4 are overlapping just like I found the 8 and 2 on one of the COLBs you handed Corsi, not to mention the letter spacing and line spacing problems. You cannot walk away from what you wrote in your book. To refresh your memory, on Page 356 you write: “But nothing was more shocking and left me with such a feeling of disgust than the blatant, obnoxiously taunting “signature” of the forger—a “happy face” drawn into the “A” of Alvin T. Onaka’s signature.” At that time no one knew it was a script “E” under the “A”. For you to know it was a signature you had to know it was a letter “E” and the name and spelling of the forger. This was before I had figured it out. You book was very helpful. If you did sue me I would have a lot of fun in the discovery stage. You should listen to Dr. Conspiracy, he just told you the same thing I just told you. [.]"

Now I'm guessing from this comment that "E" in the "A" of "Alvin T. Onaka's PH.D" as the Registrar's signature stands for "Ah'Nee" or Jahanna last name in Vogt's theory. No doubt it stands for something, and I sure wouldn't have the courage to put my initials on a Dr. Signature. In thinking of reasons for such it does always seems like when in the commission of a crime, especially an outrageous one that might be seen in the mind of the criminal to be either a claim to fame, a cop-out, or a disclaimer of actual wrong doing, this could fit that type of intent very easily. "I'll just put this here in case anyone thinks its real and that would suffice as a disclaimer of wrong doing" for instance.

Update1:[ May 14th2014. I just listened to Miki Booth's radio interview on BR Birther Report, all two episodes compassed by the first 25:13 minutes and the next 21:30 minutes. She barely mentioned Joann Ah'nee's name one time and didn't specify anything about how she knew her, or really anything about their friendship. She certainly did emphatically deny any involvement herself.

UD1- Miki is in a very difficult and delicate situation here I certainly understand. I found Miki's comment there which in fairness I will also add to the post: "Yes, that was me that posted earlier. I apologize for calling vogt a f***ing idiot. I should not have sworn even though my knee-jerk reaction to his ridiculous charge that I had anything to do with oblowme's fraud got me kinda pissed. I agree with whoever it was that said vogt took 2 + 2 and came out with 20. Even his lawyer sibley said "vogt could be wrong."
For those of you that keep up with Arpaio/Zullo investigation you will remember that Zullo publicly stated he does not support vogt's findings.
For you obots and turncoats that I used to call my friends - enjoy your potshots while you can. vogt is wrong and the truth will come out."

I say she's in a difficult situation because she is actually from Hawaii and has been a person of interest many have called upon as kind of a standard in comparing birth certificates that were issued from Hawaii. That really has been her only official capacity. Miki did not go into detail on this wanting it seemed to me to keep space between the details of Vogt's comments. She did not address the assertion that her Hawaii b.c. Certificate was not false. She did not address in any detail how she knew Johanne Ah-nee or how ludicrous even bringing her into the argument was. This is what I found missing in the interviews anyway. I certainly agree with Miki Booth that the truth will come out. I actually commented to her on her facebook awhile back an interesting dream I'd had where she was seated next to me in a hearing with Congress and remarked to here that if any Hearings took place she could bet I'd be calling her up.

UD1-

A comment made by Nathan Bickel of moralmatters.org just disappeared and then became anonomyous -"A couple of Obama media types reported how Obama went home to Chicago sometime in 2012, found some old boxes of his mother's and inside just happened to find a birth announcement booklet from Kapiolani. Within a short time Miki is reporting that, yes, in fact, her son has one of these "commemorative booklets" from Kapiolani; that these do exist, thereby giving credence to this story. She also happens to mention that Dr. Sinclair was her delivery doctor...good way for Ah-Nee ( Miki's Friend) to see Dr. Sinclair's signature..." The comment at first had his picture by it, and later in just checking, the comment became anonymous. I've sent word through a message for his verification on facebook as I am a friend.

I went through about 410 comments many supportive of Obama and many very supportive of Miki Booth. Miki's husband she said was a police officer in the interview, so I'm very sure Miki knows that in investigating crap some times it gets spilled on your shoes. If that's all that's happened she has nothing to fret over, truth will indeed come out. Because she has had so much to do with the Birther Movement and has been such an outspoken voice her value is indeed unquestionable to the Birther Movement. It would also go without saying the value she would have as a mole in the Birther Movement would be invaluable also and if I was a prosecutor I'd say she has many more questions to answer for the benefit of the Birther Movement.]



That's fine with me, because it puts squarely on the shoulders of Obama the action and intent to deceive handing it out to the White House Press Core as an actual certificate of authenticity of his identity. The Press Core ought to be very happy with this along with their remarkable access to the person in the White House as the transparent cloak of deception has been the cause of complaint of late illustrated in this report.


Dr. Conspiracy whose name I did not know was Kevin Davidson was also revealed! I have been the subject of a few stories of Mr. Davidson that were not very pleasant which is easy to do when your identity like Obama's is cloaked in shades of grey. I went back in my own archives and found stories with the same Dr. Conspiracy I had addressed on 9-11-2011 and 3-17-2014.

Dr. CONspiracy- Kevin Davidson responds: I get tagged as the one who “did the research,” which is pretty silly of you think about it, since Dr. Onaka knows a thousand times more about Hawaiian birth certificate than I do, since he has them all at his fingertips. I know something about birth certificates, having worked in the field almost all of my professional career, but I don’t have specialized knowledge about certificates in Hawaii, and could provide no help to any putative forgers of one. [...] More here.

Interesting that Dr. Conspiracy Kevin Davidson actually referred to Alvin T. Onaka as Doctor (Dr.) and left out of his response the "Hawaii's State Registrar". I mean the capacity of the signature was Hawaii State Registrar which Dr. Conspiracy left out although he included the PH.D. referenced on his signature. Not uncharacteristic of his habit of blaming people though Dr. Conspiracy-Kevin Davidson actually shifts the blame of the forgery to State of Hawaii Registrar and Dr. Onaka! He relates its silly especially because Dr. Onaka is a thousand times more knowledgeable?

For someone who has so little respect for me as an individual who has written stories and published them without a single question directed to me to answer, I found this very interesting. In essence he contributes to laying the blame or commission of a crime on someone other than himself, but in doing so he definitely acknowledges a crime has been committed.

Even if Mr. Davidson, who I'm guessing is not a doctor, but would like the title in his handle because of his chosen one as Dr. Conspiracy, has worked in the vital statistics field his whole professional career and knows something about birth certificates above and beyond we mere mortals that wouldn't be of any use or help, he certainly has been of great value to Barack Obama in his condemnation of Birthers for the last 5 years on his own dime and cloaked interest apparently.

I mean I don't write my blog ,page after page, without crediting myself with the interest, but Dr. Conspiracy has worked tirelessly without any credit to Kevin Davidson which is just a testament of the same type of thing that was actually done with Obama's long form fabrication and the forgers involved.

As far as Miki Booth is concerned I know she was called to testify at the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial as I was. She was called because she did have knowledge of and an example of her own Hawaiian Birth Certificate. I am not aware of the analysis that Vogt alludes to his claim that the examples Jahanna "Ah'nee",the friend Miki Booth defends, given to Taitz and Corsi were also forgeries, however his claim of reasoning as to format seems straight forward. I'm not aware of the closeness with Miki Booth with Jahanna Ah'nee, or how close she may have been to Obama in Hawaii Vogt refers to.

I also found this comment from her over at New Blaze:" Miki Booth · Following · Aiea High School · 274 subscribers
obama operatives are paid to find 'birther' sites and jump in with their nonsense and lies to try to discredit those that tell the truth about obama's identity fraud. As the news sites grow in popularity the obots conspire and tag-team one another to attack and spread lies. strauss is one of those operatives - others are sure to join him. Watch for it. Thank you NewsBlaze.com we appreciate you!" I have to say it would be pretty surprising if Miki had any real-time knowledge she hasn't divulged.

We do know Obama was not in this all by himself. We do know there have been people who had so little respect for the U.S. Constitution that they didn't think the qualification of the President in the Constitution was that big of deal. Right now, that includes all of Congress! Of course Congress as we know acts on information after the facts come out and it really appears they are negligent especially when that could affect their elections. This is an election year!

Doug Vogt is himself an document expert and was also used in testimony at the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trail, Miki Booth and I testified in and is interviewed here by Dr. Rev. James David Manning on the conclusions Obama's long form birth certificate is a fabrication and recently here on the death of Loretta Fuddy Vogt actually traveled to Hawaii with Taitz to examine it but they were refused that. Here is the subpoena that was served with now diseased Loredda Fuddy's name on it.

Although the summations that Vogt has reached have not been supported by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County, Arizona Cold Case Posse or lead investigator Mike Zullo, Vogt's document has sparked discussion amongst eligibility activists, and I am sure if it leads to the truth they will be on it and investigating it and we will have more light shed on this in the upcoming Arpaio-Zullo press conference as it has been touted by Mike Zullo himself to be Universe Shattering in the linked radio interview on Youtube.

The reason I have never been a real birth certificate field op is because I'm not an expert but mostly its been because we have never needed Obama's false documents to prove he is not eligible for the Office of the President. All that was necessary really was the knowledge that Obama's father was a Kenyan Citizen at the time of Obama's birth, which we understand from Obama's narrative to the public that we have on record as his "Candidate's Oath" which every candidate is required to have administered by oath stating he is qualified for the Office he is seeking election to. That in and of itself is Obama on record and under oath.

For the Office of the President the qualifications are being over 35 years of age, a natural born citizen, and having lived in the U.S. 14 years. The "Natural Born Citizen" requirement is different and not the same as the requirement for U.S. Reps. and U.S. Senators requirement of "Citizen".

By easily reasoning that "Citizen" WAS used in the qualifications for president in the Constitution for those who were such at the "time of the adoption of the Constitution" only, we know that afterwards being a "Natural Born Citizen" was the requirement. Minor v. Happersett defines from the United States Supreme Court the precedent case where we know "Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents" was qualification undoubtedly. I used this in my own case as a Presidential Candidate in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in the United States Supreme Court that did not receive the courtesy of a hearing.

It has only been the abstraction of logical reasoning that has engaged the thought that construction of the Constitution might be legal at any pass wherein an individual was really not qualified. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land however and is much more popular than any particular candidate who has a passing fancy for the crowd at the time. Many more have actually died for the Constitution and its a great disrespect to dishonor that blood the Main Stream Media has been engaged in.

What Does Congress think of the Information becoming available? This video underscores the tepid respect that is seen in the Halls of Congress with Republicans and Democrats. Let's face it they all know but don't hold or embrace the value.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwUT_tIk5Ew


I'm honored by the value of our Constitution and if there was no difference between the way I thought and those in Congress there would be no reason for me to run for President. I'd be honored with your support as I have managed my respect in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama by deed which in my opinion is much stronger than the flippant words of those others who may be running. I actually have respect for lawful investigations like Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse and used it as evidence to the judges in my case that was appealed clear up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I AM AMERICAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac



Cody Robert Judy

P.S.

If you would like to sponsor a fund raiser featuring Cody Robert Judy as a guest speaker please review the following article

Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

If you want to join the NFT-VA like the Group on Facebook and make sure we can find the City and State in which you reside.

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand