BREAKING SCOTUS NEWS Justice Sotomayer's Decision Bids Well for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal Fund Raising Summer

BREAKING SCOTUS NEWS Justice Sotomayer's Decision Bids Well for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal Fund Raising SummerIt was a 'conservative gut-check' that erupted out of the Supreme Court of the United States July 7th. With the trouncing some "Conservatives", [more especially led and or supporting U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, as declared Candidates for President and potential Candidate for President Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal who is still in the exploratory committee stages of a Presidential run], have given the U.S. Supreme Court lately I am very surprised not to see them in jubilation and parade based on the decision U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer made that they could continue to stock their campaign coffers or war chest with campaign contributions as first generation Americans for the Office of the President.

Even though there is the September 28th "Long Conference" scheduled in the U.S. Supreme Court with the active Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396, its sub-divided case 25A15 was a clear 'GREEN LIGHT' for the Summer of Fun in Contribution Heaven for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal. The "DENIAL" of the "APPLICATION FOR MORE TIME" constituted the approval of the U.S. Supreme Court for these questionably qualified Candidates for President to 'go ahead' and ramp up steam just as Senator Obama did in 2008 against Hillary Clinton. One cannot help but wonder if the decision not to head'em off at the pass will again be the ghost that comes back to haunt the Clinton Camp the same way.

From OBAMACONSPIRACY.ORG a June 30th Article entitled, "Clueless Cruz comments: Hillary started the birther movement" there was a discussion in comments I took part in that I'd like to focus on very briefly with my follow up comments to this one:

[(Donna)From 2011: "Mike Huckabee says Republicans are wasting “energy and time” time with the “birther” argument about President Obama — because if it was true, Hillary Clinton’s team would have dug it up during the 2008 primary campaign."

(Loren says) -One of the earlier long-form articles about the Birther movement, which was published by The Atlantic or some similar online news outlet, cited sources from inside McCain’s camp who acknowledged that when the birth issue first started garnering public attention, folks in McCain’s campaign did what national campaigns always do with opposition research, and they looked into it.

And as the article noted, they quickly concluded there was absolutely no merit to it, and thus the McCain campaign never made an issue of it either.]

CRJ Responding Comment:

#1 [That’s because McCain had the same problem.

“Obama said: “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”

Calling the qualifications in the Constitution for the Office of President “a loophole” is exactly what they had to figure out how to jump through.

” The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specified a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”

Democrats knew McCain wasn’t qualified either but they needed Republicans to get through that loophole Obama was going to need. This is nothing knew, but trying to say there was opposition from “Inside” the D’s or “Outside” from R’s is really sounding like a denial of the facts.

” SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by D-McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

On April 18, 2008, the New York Times concluded that the eligibility issue could only be resolved by a Constitutional amendment, but confirmed the political fait accompli.

“Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said D- Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”

Quotes:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution]

#2 [Hillary Clinton was on record as saying that U.S. Sen Res 511 would probably not stand Constitutional scrutiny and or was flimsy to paraphrase her statement.

I took that as her last stand for integrity before selling out, understanding that though she had gone to bat for McCain in Co- Sponsoring 511, she also understood it was definitely just a signal turning left and not Constitutional as sound as an Amendment that would compromise the Office of the President to foreign influence by opening the door from “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” (which entails two generations) to the diluted state of one generation as understood by Aliens and Nationals naturalization processes of Title 8 and 14th Amend.

JUSTICE Sotomayer new Hero for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal in SCOTUS CASE #15A25 (?)

Can’t believe we haven’t heard of the parades and enthusistic jubilee yet From Doc?

I think Doc won the bet.. Based on his time line of “June” because the Judy v. Obama 25A15 Case has been ruled on that was Docketed June 29th.

My loss in the time frame constituted my coming on here and saying,” Doc was right and I was wrong. ”

I hope this fullfills that bet Doc(?). I just couldn’t quite get that positive affirmation that give ole Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal a green light to raise contribution funds through the Summer.

I gave it my best shot but admittingly came up short. I admit I’m somewhat hurt that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t back me up with a Amici on this. While she allows Rubio to pick up speed the same way she did Obama she may find the same outcome.

This has never truly been about me winning. It’s been about getting people who could win to stand up using the Constitution instead of abusing it.

An Amendment is proper and Civil. The bully tactic is rude and abusive.

http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/07/breaking-news-obamas-ineligibility.html?m=1 ]


THE APPLICATION OF TIME SOTOMAYER DENIED GREEN LIGHTING SUMMER FUND RAISING FOR CRUZ,RUBIO,JINDAL Unopposed by CLINTON.

The two significant parts of the EXTENSION OF TIME which was denied by Justice Sotomayer that allows Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal to continue raising funds through the 2015 Summer Quarter were stated as follows. The whole Application is also available at the bottom of this post.

9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.

10- Attending this PRINCIPLE of the U.S. Constitution is vital to the 46% of America’s Voters who are in fact now Independent Voters according to a January 2015 Gallup Poll . The Court avoiding the Issue does not serve them as it affects the race among republicans and democrats and we all look for guidance on the interpretation of the Constitutions’ demanding standards for the Office of the President being different than the “Citizen” standard for Senators and Representatives.
Petitioner then prays that this Motion will be granted in the considerations of the necessity requiring a decision before July 13th, 2015 as instructed by the Court through and by Justice Sotomayer, reviewing Justice for the 10th Circuit.

Hillary Clinton was given has been given an invitation to weigh in directly on this site as well as directing Tweets to her Twitter Account with an Amici to the United States Supreme Court but thus far has not.

With this information it is a double edged sword that 'conservatives' for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal vowing to undue the SCOTUS decisions of Obamacare do not see that it has been Justice Sotomayer who has allowed their Campaigns for President to flourish during the Summer months, while she has hurt fund raising efforts for my own bid for President with the delay costing me the whole Summer in a  lost momentum.

Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy for U.S.  President 2016

By supporting Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 you help protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Please, help him with a Contribution Today at his safe and secure PAYPAL Contribution Link Here.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY WARRANTS "LONG 2nd CONFERENCE" by SCOTUS JUSTICES!

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY WARRANTS "LONG 2nd CONFERENCE" by SCOTUS JUSTICES!

This day has been a remarkable day of revelations for me I just can't wait to get off my chest! First off, it was noticed on the Docket of the Court concerning Judy v. Obama 15A25,that United States Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer has 'DENIED' the APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME in my request that the Court give me more time to pay the Court fees and prepare the Brief according to the U.S. Supreme Court printing guidelines because I didn't have enough money to do that now, or at least wait until the Court had a chance to rule upon my Motion for Review and Reconsideration of my DENIED IFP also PENDING for a September 28th Conference Date.

Now the reason the APPLICATION FOR TIME EXTENSION was just a formality was because the Second CONFERENCE had already been scheduled for September 28th by the Court. My thoughts every since the Court had denied my in forma pauperis (IFP) Status was that they simply did so to buy more time to discuss it. That time would have necessarily disappeared if Justice Sotomayer had granted my APPLICATION FOR TIME, because what I proposed in that was actually "I wanna hurry this up and get it done during the Summer" and by Denying it Justice Sotomayer basically said, "We'd like to take some time on this and wait until September 28th where we have scheduled a "Long Conference" over it."

We already know that the DENIAL of the Motion for IFP Status was not due to being 'Frivolous' or as the Court Clerk said it would have been noted as Denied Pursuant to Rule 39.8 of the Supreme Court Rules which states again:

"8. If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis"

This was not stated on the Denial anywhere on the Order.

WHAT DOES THE SECOND "LONG CONFERENCE" MEAN RATHER THAN A "SHORT CONFERENCE"

What do I have to back such unspoken communication up? Well, I have the Court's own CALENDAR to back it up! Pictured above is the Supreme Court of the United States Calendar. Many were surprised that anything would be happening during the Month of July because the Court is 'Recessed' at the end of June. So, let's say that you thought they'd all gone home? Now you know we have Justice Sotomayer's Ruling July 7th proving to you that they didn't, even though they are indeed in Recess. I've stated before they use 'Recess' periods to go over Cases in developing and writing opinions as well as ruling on Motions and Applications of what are termed Active Cases.

They don't want to formally call my case 'Active', because, and this is my own speculations but its based on a conservative and realistic considerations that are facts- we might lose Air Force One with Obama on it to a Foreign safe haven.

What I did with the Title Picture of this Post is to make a copy of what the Court's Calendar looks like during the months of July, August, and September. Its blank, compared to the Calendar on the right of that picture which is filled with all kinds of color coded squares marking days that the Court will do things and then giving you the code to know what is being done on those days.

You will notice Days marked with a RED BOX are given to ARGUMENT DAYS. Those marked with a GREEN BOX are given to what we call 'CONFERENCES', but they are under what is termed silently a "SHORT CONFERENCE". Now how do we know that? Well, when I had my 1st Conference June 18th if you recall there were 177 Cases to get through that day. How long do you think the Justices can spend on one Case if they have 177 to go through in one day? Well, let's just say they did it in six hours thirty minutes of an eight hour work day.

That means they had 390 minutes that allowed for 2.2 minutes for each Case. That day June 18th, 165 Cases were sent packing on the DENIED LIST and only 12 came out alive one way or the other. Mine was placed on the PENDING MOTIONS LIST and we learned after the ORDERS LIST came out I had been denied IFP status. Of course the normal rebuttal for a denial like that is a RECONSIDERATION which got in and had a 2nd Conference Scheduled for.

What we must notice though is the surprise that the Court gave us in scheduling my 2nd Conference for September 28th! You notice that they could have given me another 'short conference' Day say October 9th or 16th when the normal Fall Session begins, but they didn't.

The Supreme Court of the United States scheduled my Case for September 28th which we know is a 'LONG CONFERENCE DATE'. So, that's the good news! The bad news is it doesn't appear they are interested in rushing the Case over the Summer which I kinda had hoped for. There will be many nay-sayers to the facts I have presented here, but I really think if you think this through and follow each step as it has happened that you will find they are tried and present a true picture of the facts.

The United States Supreme Court does not need a 'LONG CONFERENCE' to discuss amongst themselves wither I should or should not be given what amounts to $300 filing fee to the Court. A 'Short Conference' would suffice. I mean Yes, it would cost me more in printing up 48 copies in the booklet form, but remember that printing cost of upward of $4,000 dollars is not going to go to the Supreme Court. That would go to the printer. The filing fee is only $300, its not a matter of breaking a bank to pay for Justice so anyone whose telling you that the Court needs a Long Conference to hear a IFP case, or that the Court just does this for 'frivolous' cases is probably smoking some of that mushroom cloud stuff they now call legal in Colorado.

Believe me, they nay-Sayers on this are on both sides of the isle Democrats and Republicans because it has to do with not only Obama but Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal if he declares to run for President officially as the other two have. That's a whole lot of people trying their very best to dampen down the hope, and melt the courage. Of course it takes courage to stand up for Principles of our Constitution when you have quite a few people running around and stomping like the Devil's going to Georgia.

Now if for any reason we see that June 28th 2ND LONG CONFERENCE scheduled change, then we ought to worry that we don't have a prayer. Until that time comes, we sure do and we are doing better than anyone has yet cause we're East Bound and Down Rolling up we're Trucking, we're gonna do what they say can't be done. Well, we got a long way to go, and a short time to get there, I'm East bound just watch ole Bandit Run!


OTHER NEWS

This was a real big shocker to me today and I feel it is necessary for me to make confession. Today I found out about 3pm that LDS President of the Quorum of the Twelve Boyd K. Packer had passed away last Friday at 2pm.

I was absolutely shocked about this news and just learning it today. I have to confess a few things because it does seem silly that because he passed away on Friday that in some way I should have heard about it Friday Night, Saturday, Sunday or Monday morning, but it just was not the case. In my confessions I will tell you I do not have a TV as far as cable or regular stations. I have a TV but the cable for reception was broken in a move in 2004 and I've never fixed it because I really don't have time to watch TV and on the rare occasion I do, I just watch a video and works well hooked up to a DVD.

The Radio I have on my kitchen table had the antenna pulled out of it about two months ago and the clock stopped keeping time accurately. I have no idea why I keep it there. I haven't heard it on the car radio which isn't that surprising due to the channel I mostly keep it on. If it wasn't on the Drudge Report I didn't see it on the Internet. This is more disturbing to me than anyone else I suppose because I just can't fathom not being told by a single person and not hearing somehow or someway on the news. In a discussion with my Mom today she related she had listened to an interview conducted by and I wrote the names down so I could google it "Gregory Prince and Doug Fabriezo" which I did and that's how I found out he had passed away.

Just felt I needed to relay that because of the Dream I related in no way shape or form had any context to my knowing or understanding he had passed away Friday and was meant in absolutely no disrespect, but I could certainly understand if someone reading it Monday and knowing he had passed away on Friday might take it that way.

While I am not a member of the LDS Faith I would not undertake to relate something factious that might be construed to disrespect him in a way that was malicious and I certainly take no part in saying I controlled the dream while I slept. I rather thought it was quite revalatory in nature to myself even, for I would have no way of knowing the intricacies of the subjects whatsoever, and I did not know the man personally at all.

I actually called my Mom back later this afternoon and said, "Why didn't you say he had died?" She said, she just assumed I knew. Things like this really come to me as little insights that we are simply a small part of what is known and understood by God and if or when we ever discount that we do so at an extreme loss of balance, harmony, and knowledge of intelligence. Of course many things, everything in a dream can be symbolic, but it was dog-gone specific in naming him wan't it? So I thought I just needed to, you know, add a condolence to his Family and Friends with the understanding there was no malice of my heart in the relation whatsoever.

Thank you for understanding this.

COMMENT OF THE DAY SECTION

I also just wanted to send out a big thank you for my featured COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY and say what a treat that was for her to relate to me that she had found some use for the things I had done in the legal world. That was really sweet of her.
You know when all is said and done, can you name a single Case in United States Eligibility Questioning History that will this September 28th have lasted NINE MONTHS in the United States Supreme Court? I can't!

To say that we are not doing better than any other challenge in the HISTORY of Obama's Ineligibility would just be a fools errand. Nine Months! Whew! We have been in there fighting for really an incredible phenomenon in America's History that I believe is going to go down as one of the greatest FIGHTS for Liberty and Freedom in the World's History.

The other day I was thinking about Stands around certain parts of the Constitution. You know the pro choice/pro life stands on abortions that surround different parts of the Constitution; the pro 2nd Amendment Communities that include Gun Rights/and Gun Fights are pretty famous. Now look at Birthers and the fight to give our Nation a President void of foreign influence for two generations in the requirement of a 'natural born Citizen' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents that surrounds Article Two Patriots!

Whole industrious enterprises have sprung up from nothing about this. The Post & Email that just made this Post a Featured Editorial. The Birther Report, WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com , Obamaconspiracy.org, commanding the attention of huge populations of America.

They were really non-existent prior to 2008. Now we have them; Internet Communities and Organizations and On-Line Newspapers and Blogs across this whole Nation with that at their Center of Gravity both pro and con. Its really an amazing and unique part of American history that you all have made!

That brings me to a final point that I'd like to address in this Blog Post which is the 551st Post and it revolves around this comment that is made quite often in just a little different way every time but maintains the same jet-stream. That is the point that Obama has gotten away with this for so long that its just not fair not to let others get away with it like Cruz, Rubio, or Jindal. I cannot think of a greater double negative to set your Country on the course of.

Of all the accomplishments and accolades available in History, how does Usurper sound to you? Does any politician in the world want that Tag? If they do please follow the same course as Obama has. Lie about who you are, put out a fabricated identification and use your outwards characteristics to promote your agenda. That is not what building character is about and it certainly not the reputation anyone wants. On that point I think we can all agree.

Yes, Obama has had the pleasure of riding around on Air Force One and commanding the Country for six years. The rest of his life he will have to think about the cheating and awful circumstances by which he gained that pleasure but history will recall him in what really is going to be called the darkest years of American history and the sorriest set back for Civil Rights and our Voting Rights for all minorities that make the Citizenry of this Country!

I'm seeing black folks who are amazing Americans all, 'shaking my head' (SMH), saying for generations 'That boy shouldn't have done what he done. It was a lie and it was wrong,and that is not what America is about.'

Whew.. we have lasted 9 months in the United States Supreme Court! Nice!!! We have three months and I would like to come visit every State to say Hi. (smile)

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT [S]plits OBAMA 'INELIGIBILITY' CASE During Recess!

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT [S]plits OBAMA 'INELIGIBILITY' CASE During Recess!

The intensity was palpable- 'Hanging by a Thread' - 'Not Dead'.. Yet' - had all been used to describe Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the most intense case in the Land of Birtherdom which thus far had just refused to die in the Supreme Court of the United States. Most Americans' would never know the burden that lay upon a man who had sought for Justice but had not found it for what seemed an entire life time. Again he was on the all to familiar 'chopping block' waiting for news from those in high seats of authority wondering if Justice would gain a foothold or wither for a myriad of political reasons the Justices would impart to Justice what they felt was best for everyone leaving him the Dark Night for which the trespasses of Justices would be shouldered yet another day.

Few could comprehend the magnitude of the burden that lay upon his shoulders as he had fought and clawed his way back to the United States Supreme Court for the third time in his life. No one understood that the Constitution had been shredded for many years to him by the facts that all would agree that evidence was due to anyone in a Criminal Action, but his had been denied to him. That in and of itself was the proposal of malcontent by those who stated they esteemed Justice, but tied it in so many double knots that its simplicity was often unrecognizable.

For many Justice like journalism had become so lazy in a multi-leveled parking garage that fast-food was the home-cooked meal and the real deal did not exist. Americans could not remember where they had parked their own car because it required remembering for longer than the new eight seconds which pushed the limits of their attention span on the super fast computer highway they called the Internet. The only eight seconds that was still in tact as the real eternity was understood by a dying bread of bull-riders who strapped themselves on a two ton giant hoping to hang on long enough to win that purse which would get them to their next rodeo ride; and to those still waiting for this web page to pop up the government purposely slow tracked for their own advantage.

He could already count the people who were boiling mad at him for placing three paragraphs in front of the BREAKING NEWS, but he didn't care. He hadn't been elected by the fast, friendly, and convenient crowd and he preferred making home-cooked meals the time to cook which would have had three people fired at McDonalds for insubordination by now. There were definite advantages to speed but in some things taking the time was well worth the wait. Some things could wait; Like his first wedding he was twenty minutes late for. She still married him.

BREAKING NEWS OF THE DAY

It was one year ago today I filed this Case. Many people have been asking me what is happening with the Case and why they have not see the 'APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME", now read 3,421 times on the Internet SCRIBd Page since it was uploaded six days ago. That's quite a lot for something that is as boring as 'Court Filings' on a Case presumed to be Dead if you ask me.

What has happened? Why is it not Docketed on your Case No. 14-9396? Was it even filed? Well, yes it was filed, and it is Docketed.

What the Supreme Court of the United States of America did was make a sub-division and assigned that Application its very own Court Case number which is understood to be Judy v. Obama 15A25. Yeah, that's kind of cool if you didn't know they could do that.

There are some positives and some negatives associated with it; I'll explain. When an APPLICATION is made to the Court it is governed by Rule 22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States. Part 4 of that rule explains very clearly why the whole Case is on the chopping block with this decision and could simply be blown away by the Justice governing individual applications for the Tenth Circuit which is Justice Sotomayer.

The first clause of Part 4 of Rule 22 states:
[A Justice denying an application will note the denial thereon. Thereafter, unless action thereon is restricted by law to the Circuit Justice or is untimely under Rule 30.2, the party making an application, except in the case of an application for an extension of time, may renew it to any other Justice, subject to the provisions of this Rule.]


I've highlighted the concerning part for all of those hoping for this case. In other words, we do not get to make another application for an extension of time to another Justice on two counts. Number one its obviously prohibited as is in bold print above- Number 2 - the Court stated that the fees were to be paid to the Court and the Printing requirements full filled that would cost around $4,000 would need to be done by July 13th. We tried to raise the money but failed to do so in the time allowed specified in that Order of the Court made June 18th. We did however raise enough money to get this APPLICATION filed and Docketed in the time that was needed to get that done at least, but we are on the chopping block folks.

Normally, I would have thought we would have had a ruling on this Application printed out on the SUPREME COURT ORDERS that usually appears as Miscellaneous Orders THURSDAY 7-02-15, but it wasn't there although as you can see it was Docketed June 29th. These Miscellaneous Orders really are not bound to a schedule when the Court is in its '(Working) Recess Period'. I say 'working' because many think that during Recess of the Court everyone goes home for three months, but that is not the Case.

The Court continues to work on Active Cases and to rule upon Motions and Applications just like this one as well as work on writing opinions. We can expect a decision on this Application tomorrow Friday July 10th, Monday July 13th- which is the Dooms Day the Case was given to comply with Paying the Fees and Printing Cost, or at the latest July 16th which is next Thursday.

Now, we also know on the regular Case Docket that a 2nd Conference has been ORDERED by the Court. That 2ND CONFERENCE is Calendared by the Court September 29th, 2015, [Important Point: I cannot personally Calendar Conferences of the Court as many have accused in a summation this whole thing I've concocted legally in the Court without the Clerks or Justices doing anything but Docketing what I tell them to (smile)]

SUMMING IT UP
So..this should give you all just a little taste of a little bit of hand-wringing, palms sweating
, Nail biting, whatever it is that you do that is going on here at the CRJ Camp that we are experiencing at this time. To Sum it up Justice Sotomayer (Also nominated by Obama- Don't forget!) does have it within her powers to DENY the APPLICATION FOR MORE TIME, which then would necessarily make the July 13th Dooms Day Dismissal go into effect, and the 2nd CONFERENCE would necessarily be canceled due to the Case's dismissal July 13th. Our hard work goes down in flames.

The cowboys say, 'Ya Cowboy up and ya Spur'em in the Guts! You ride HARD till you get bucked off.' That's what we have done here, and that's what we will keep on doing. If we live we live. If we die we die knowing we did our best and it just wasn't our turn. I always have faith in Justice coming around and its usually worse for those who delay it, and avoid it, then those who stand up and face it Responsibly. I do believe the public at least has that respect for what we have done here even if our fund raising project come up short.
Supreme Court Justice Thomas: We're Evading Article II Eligibility Issue - 4/16/10


Cody Robert Judy/CRJ Camp/ - Presidential Campaign 2016

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI.,AZ., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!

*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI