Monday, July 6, 2015
BREAKING REPORT: OBAMA America's Worst Nightmare 'FOLDING' in U.S. Supreme Court?
BREAKING REPORT: OBAMA America's Worst Nightmare 'FOLDING' in U.S. Supreme Court?
The most popular post of this Blog's entire history are about "Obama's Ineligibility" and the question of his "Resigning". People are interested in the Constitution being upheld, but they are skeptical about 'Justice' being carried out and it seems their skepticism is fueling their worst nightmare rather than encouraging their dream. Skepticism is a disease for hope and faith. "I'll believe when I see it", is also a self-full filing prophesy. What is that?
Self-full filling prophesy is as [a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior], or negative I might add. In other words, your 'believe' in doubting, skepticism, and an all-around apathy for the consideration at hand, may doom the enterprise you actually wanted to see succeed rather than fail.
So what happens when a whole bunch of people get together and say, "He's gonna fail". Well, they do not contribute, they act upon him as if he is their enemy and they are the worst sort of antagonist they possibly can be. And this is all done with the 'hope' in the back of their mind that he succeeds beyond their wildest imaginations. Now for those people right now I have to report that the Lord is very angry with you. This report very much concerns those who are rich and could right now today write out a check for $2,700 for the husband and $2,700 dollars for the wife that equal more than the $5,000 dollars necessary to pay the filing fee and the printing cost of the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case in the United States Supreme Court today.
One couple in a single maximum contributions could have made a big difference. Who might that couple have been who failed? Who might have been that couple who were on the verge of it, but failed because of their lack of faith and belief fueled by their own doubts, self-full filling prophesy, and or apathy? Please let's review some facts that at least we can rely on as TRUTH that should have placed all doubts, all apathy, and all negative behaviors towards me and my Campaign away, shall we? I want to speak to Republicans who are very well off right now who could do this with a snap right now because that is what the Lord showed me in a dream last night.
I must confess that if it were not for my DREAMS of TRUTH and RIGHTEOUSNESS I would not be the only Presidential Candidate in America today to hold the principle of the 'natural born Citizen' clause up by Federal Court Record amongst both Republicans and Democrats. I do not say that 'bragging up myself' as a feather in my cap, because did you hear me say that I would not be that man unless it were for my DREAMS? I mean that literally.
Of course there are many kinds of dreams for many reasons including what you had to eat and what you were hoping or doing, but there are also the DREAMS of prophesy given to a person to act as I referred to in TRUTH AND RIGHTEOUSNESS.
How many people believe President George Washington's words when he said in 1796 :
"Towards the preservation of your government...it is requisite...that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown."
I say unto you; is there any greater truth to you this day that comes by a usurpation of the 'natural born Citizen' clause understood to be 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' to exactly what President Washington was elaborating upon in this statement? You think about the disaster and I almost want to say 'total disaster' that Obama has been in all of the 'key' talking points of the Republican Candidates for President, yes, however diverse or trivial they may be to you, think of all of them and then ask yourselves "Why haven't any of them sued Obama for damages upon their campaigns for not being a natural born Citizen?" "Why is Cody Robert Judy the only one who has done this?" "Why is his name in the U.S. Supreme Court and Mr. Cruz's, Mr. Rubio's, Mr. Christie's, Mr. Trump's, Mr. Walker's, Mr. Romney's, Mr. Huckabee's , Mr. J. Bush's, Mr. Paul's,Mr. Carson, Mrs. Fiorina, Mr. Santorum,Mr. Pataki,Mr. Graham, Mr. Perry,Mr. Jindal,and Mr. Kasich, are not?
Would it all be because of Mr. Senator McCain? HERE]and [HEAR]
The TRUTH of the REVOLVING OPEN DOOR?
An interesting tid-bit surfaced about the truth as Romney,Rubio, and Bush criticized Mr Trump in a report offered by Breitbart by Mathew Boyle who wrote:[What’s odd about this situation is that objective evidence proves that Trump is correct, and there seems to be a politically correct machine pushing all these politicians to attack the truth.] and then he made the case of Mr. Trumps statement that Mexico wasn't interested in seeing their very best go to America as illegal aliens with no less than five cases that really are a consideration if your concerned with your family being raped or even murdered that tells of an agenda among even hard working industrious folks who are all illegal aliens in the first place Trump was speaking about.
I heard not one word from Mr. Trump slamming Americans who are legal immigrants.. not one word. Now if you want to play the 'drifting quote game' on race relations and attribute those false narratives equally among Presidential Candidates, you'd have to include this one from Candidate Clinton:
Now I don't doubt Mrs. Clinton is not racist any more than Mr. Trump at their heart and isn't that what we should be looking at rather than the false narrative Shakira tapped out as was reported July 2nd [Shakira has blasted Donald Trump's 'hateful and racist' speech on Mexican immigrants], we all know Mr. Trump was talking about illegal aliens crossing the borders illegally and not legal Mexican immigrants who are Americans now. I absolutely adore Shakira by the way and think her music is some of the best and fun I love to dance to. Again, I wouldn't hold her 'whole person' accountable to one statement perhaps even made in a lack of knowledge or bad information, or else I'd have to never listen or buy another song from her.
We can see how fast 'DIVISION' happens and how easily the worst about someone can really wipe out all of the good about someone. Of course Shakira doesn't want her kids,Milan Piqué i Mebarak and Sasha Piqué i Mebarak being raped or killed as 5 time deported illegal alien Francisco Sanchez is alleged to have done July 4th, than the rest of us do and that is something I think I can say we all have in common without even asking her. Of course she is not American but is Colombian and lives in Spain although her American Audience has had a great deal to do with her success with Sony reporting, Shakira is the highest-selling Colombian artist of all time, having sold between 50 and 60 million records. She can certainly say what she wants, but as far as the Constitution of the United States she has only 'business interest' and a 'fan' base in America. We as Americans have to see to the business of keep America strong, independent, and our Constitution in tact.
THE MONEY REPORT
Now all of the people of the United States who have money. You see what is happening in Greece with Banks preparing to raid deposits in order to avert collapse? You also see why American's have been busy scuffling over what meaning the 'Confederate flag' has compared to the Denver Broncos fan flag, a report has surfaced of 8.5 Trillion Dollars that has gone missing along with some nuclear bombs. Can you imagine losing that kind of money along with a few nukes?
As is noticed by this video and really has to be acknowledged by everyone the month of June, that just happened to be correlated with the June 18th Conference of Judy v. Obama 14-9396, was just crazy. Distractions distractions distractions to keep America's eye focused on what they wanted it focused on instead of where it should have been focused.
Facts direct us to understand that most well funded intelligence agencies we know as the CIA and FBI report to Obama.The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) reports directly to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI); in practice, the director deals with the DNI, Congress, and the White House, while the Deputy Director is the internal executive.
The Director of National Intelligence serves as the head of the Intelligence Community, overseeing and directing the implementation of the National Intelligence Program and acting as the principal adviser to the President, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council for intelligence matters related to national security.
With those facts, how is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 relatively related to the focus of all of these organizations under the the direction and investigation orders of Obama? Do you think what I am doing in the United States Supreme Court is dangerous? I understate those facts to you, nor can I understate the facts that the United States Supreme Court did not wipe my Case away in the June 18th Conference with a flyswatter so easily available to them. Does Justice have a chance in this Country? I assure with these facts that it does! If you haven' contributed or read the facts of my Report and Conference with the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court you need to do that here with special attention to #4 .
You know the worst part of this job is having to tell people what a crappy job they are doing? I really really really hate doing that, but with what I am about to show you I think your going to have to agree with me. Of course I'm in this boat sink, float, sail,..whatever with you. I've gotten more legal advice and fewer dollars than a lawyer whose wet behind his ears from walking across the graduate stage.
What's the bad news? Well it has to do with money and those who have it, not giving it where it matters in the interest of this Country and our Constitution. Many people do not know what kind of contributions and how much are legal, so I think it is worth posting up.
Contribution limits according to the FEC
An individual may give a maximum of:
$2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee. Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections.
$5,000 per calendar year to a PAC. This limit applies to a PAC (political action committee) that supports Federal candidates. (PACs are neither party committees nor candidate committees. Some PACs are sponsored by corporations and unions--trade, industry and labor PACs. Other PACs, often ideological, do not have a corporate or labor sponsor and are therefore called nonconnected PACs.) PACs use your contributions to make their own contributions to Federal candidates and to fund other election-related activities.
$100 in currency (cash) to any political committee. (Anonymous cash contributions may not exceed $50.) Contributions exceeding $100 must be made by check, money order or other written instrument.
Basically what this means is I do not have any reason to be embarrassed to my Maker about what I have done in following directions, but the folks with money who are not supporting this effort really do, and you need to know the Lord sees it very clearly.
Of course you may not think it worthy consideration as a moral issue, but I really feel it is an emphasized direction from the Divine Source also attributed by President George Washington as stated in 1792:
"I am sure there never was a people, who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States, and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them."
We had two donations through the 4th of July Holiday weekend totaling $62.41 and in Total since the June 18th Conference where my Case in the United States Supreme Court was put on the 'Pending Motions List' rather than the 'Denied' /or/ "Dead List" that every other Court Case regarding Obama's Eligibility has been placed upon has ended up on, we have had around 25 separate contributions roughly come in totaling less than $1500.
God Bless those who have contributed, from the smallest donation of $2 to the highest contributor of $200, and what do you suppose I am to say about those who have not contributed which might have to do with God? I cannot stop that you know. I just can't.
SO I HAD A DREAM LAST NIGHT
So I had a dream last night I will tell as it was with nothing added so help me God.
[ I saw myself telling my step mother thank you for a contribution. She was a fair lady from Charleston, South Carolina who had remarried and had done well as far as having a little more money. She was writing me out a $150 dollar check and I thanked her for it graciously. When suddenly, a call came to my cell phone. I was torn to take it while dealing directly with this Lady, but opted as our business was nearly settled in formalities, and the importance of the call pressed upon me coming in, to take it.
" Hello, this is Cody Robert Judy", I said. On the other line I heard a man's voice. " Mr. Judy, this is, (I do not recall the name Mr. so-in-so). I have seen a report that has been circulating. I saw a flash of a story that was making headlines of mine. It was one I had also distributed over and over as well as others who had made quite a spectacle of it. We might say it was one that had gone as we say viral that had to do with my United States Supreme Court Case. I saw it constantly repeated near obnoxiously on the internet.
Mr. so-in-so was a bread maker and had many stores across the Nation. He welcomed me to stop in at any of his stores in very hospitable fashion. I truly felt welcome. He proceeded with a conversation with me on the phone about intelligence from God. I do not recall the exact format, but I do recall the following details.
In some what of a dissertation of communication with God he prospected a realization that at times God jumps the line. Meaning at times God does not follow a particular order that you would normally expect. As an example of this and for substantiating reason for it he brought to my attention the fact that LDS President of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles Boyd K. Packer had devolved upon two particular actions in foreign Country's that were themselves illegal.
I did not have the foggiest idea of those actions, nor do I now, but I did see a spirit come upon Boyd K. Packer of this action which he endeavored which ought nought to have been done and it involved writings and communications the full purpose of which was not recognized nor did it accentuate or come to pass having been blocked to his frustration.
This was not related to me in any way as far as my person, but was simply more of Mr. so-in-so's musings to himself and me as to looking at the facts he knew about but I did not, but also that actually bode more well for me and my cause and relations to God. I remember expressly repeating to him at least twice, "Whats best for the all the parties involved", in reference to all of those involved with actions with me, and also including myself.
He then asked me if I golfed. I said "Yes, I do", and then he asked me if I had a 'clean set of golf clubs' which I thought about and repeated again "Yes". He then asked me if I could meet him on a golf course on the next day, to which I repeated that I would be more than happy to. I thought in my dream of his generosity to pay my golfing fees for the day, buying my drinks of refreshment and perhaps a contribution at the end of the round coming up to around $500.
I thought I must get to the practice field and hit a few buckets of balls to tighten my straight ball swing out a bit as I was out of much practice.] This was the end of the dream that I recall.
As I have pondered this, I have put a few things in perspective. Certainly I have not had any rich philanthropist contributing to my Campaign. The facts of my case in the consideration of the Constitution and its interpretation of the founders and signers is sure and I'd like to bolster that up with a very well written piece published by an attorney I respect and admire who has handled some Ineligibility Cases that related to Ballot Challenges in 2012 towards Mr. Obama entitled JULY 4TH 1776 The Birth Day of the Nation and the Natural Born Citizen, by: Mario Apuzzo.
A Real Credit to David Ramsay
David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815) was an American physician, patriot, and historian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congress in 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States in Congress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians.
Quoting the article again with emphasis on #4 [4th. None can claim citizenship as a birth-right, but such as have been born since the declaration of independence, for obvious reasons: no man can be born a citizen of a state or government, which did not exist at the time of this birth. Citizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken a part in the last revolution; but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens. Those who died before the revolution, could leave no political character to their children, but of subjects, which they themselves possessed. If they had lived, no one could be certain whether they would have adhered to the king or congress. Their children, therefore, may claim by inheritance the rights of “British subjects,” but not of “American citizens.” ]
[Here we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential Founder defined a natural born citizen. Noah Webster, 1828, in explaining how an American dictionary of the English language was necessary because American words took on different meanings than the same word in England, placed David Ramsay among great Founders such as “Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jay, Madison, Marshall, Ramsay, Dwight, Smith, Trumbull...” Given his position of influence and especially given that he was a highly respected historian, Ramsay would have had the contacts with other influential Founders and Framers and would have known how they too defined a natural born citizen. Ramsay, being of the Founding generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a natural born citizen and he told us that such a person was one born in the country to citizen parents. In giving us this definition, it is clear that Ramsay did not follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of nations, and Emer de Vattel, who also defined the “natives, or natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his highly acclaimed and influential treatise, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English).]
AGAIN, WHERE DO YOU STAND?
We all must answer to the stand we have taken. Wither it be for me or against me as it pertains simply to Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court for the damages I have suffered as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 and 2012, as well as do now suffer in my 2016 Campaign. What damages are those?
Every dollar collected by an ineligible Candidate is also a damage that I can say occurred against the will penned of and under the protections of what we call the Constitution of the United States. How much has U.S. Senator Ted Cruz himself illegal in the Office of the President reported collecting? Since March, which was also the month of my Case being recognized in the United States Supreme Court, 51 Million dollars is reported. [Ted Cruz's presidential campaign said Sunday it had raised about $10 million in the second quarter. The sum is fueled by small-dollar donors, they said.]
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, also ineligible for the Office of the President through his fund raising efforts reports he has a $10 million dollar man and has raised 14 million in 2014, raising a total of what is said to be 31 million.
The relative likelihood that just these two campaigns are involved in money that is being committed on the basis of fraud against the United States Constitution just since March combines for a total of over 70 million dollars. How important is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in value just in taking a look at the opposition of Campaigns and Commitments to those Campaigns?
What I hope to have shown you today is the importance of undertaking we are involved in here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp. To underestimate our value is a real dis-service to our Nation's principles and the history of the United States. To do such dis-service and walk around calling yourself a patriot is about as big of a disgrace as you can make of yourself. I am formally calling upon all Americans to move forward on this, to press ahead diligently on their social media sites, to send it to their local press reporters, and as they have the capacity to contribute directly to do so TODAY.
While we were short to get our Fees and Printing finished the Supreme Court has extended the time as is noticed by the SECOND CONFERENCE scheduled. I feel pressed to ask again all Americans if they think this work is not a good work? If they think for one instances that I myself am not in the cross hairs of high powered scopes? And if they realize that without protections and concern for this understanding the magnitude of it, that they might realize it in a day I am also dead. Who will they then count on in this highest of accountability for Justice in the Principle? I certainly am in service to you as a brother in Christ. If you do not believe that you have no accounting of facts or relative accounting of purpose in any regard for the principles, freedoms, and liberties afforded only by the Constitution of the United States of America. Which of these rights do you now love and which are you prepared to give away?
What I am saying is with just the viewers of this Blog there should be no way that we haven't achieved our Fund Raising Goal of $5,000 set for June 18th till Today June 6th exactly one week before the July 13th Deadline that was on the Docket Report. Through my own diligence to the Court costing what lawyers would charge upward of $5,000 for two Motions expeditiously delivered to the Court we have a SECOND CONFERENCE date. Now I believe that is a second chance for you to get with the program and get yourself on Record in Heaven and Earth to having taken a stand where there should be no question whatsoever on where you should be by reason, facts, and principle.
Help me Patriots Today to make a Better America Tomorrow!
Cody Robert Judy
UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT
here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.
Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!
*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You