TREASON Reason America may not be the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave

TREASON

Reason America may not be the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave Anymore

Opportunity has been the biggest reason the United States of America has fundamentally changed the world. By leading in opportunity for each and every person to better their lives a generational hope was sown in the ground of the Union. The birth of a new nation was founded on the laws of attraction. In the New Thought philosophy, the Law of Attraction is the belief that positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person's life. The USA's framers and founders in the beginning knew that success would be dependent upon the opportunity of the individual. Thusly, the Constitution Republic was sewn in the seeds of opportunity of the Law of the Harvest- 

Galatians 6:7

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

The law of sowing and reaping also has a negative side. We not only enter into the blessings God has bestowed, but we also reap the results of wrong others have sown both before us and around us. It is impossible to deny at the time of our birth and we were born in the traditions of those who came up before us, and with certainty our development reflect those tradition, customs, and mores.

Proverbs 22:6

Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

The Lord...visits the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.

(Exodus 34:6-7 = Deuteronomy 5:8-10)

As the climax of the opportunity is reached for a society, just as swiftly, we can identify a weakness in Pride and in such a slip from the cup to the lip or a broken covenant - even a change in the DNA. 

Isaiah 24:5-6

"The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant. Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate; therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left."

It stands to reason that as we are born into a chain of abuse or cycle of abuse, the only way to break it is by not only asking to be forgiven, but asking the Lord to forgive your fathers to the third and fourth generation as it is entirely reasonable to see those traditions back that far ingrained on us deep as scratches on a copper plate. We don't often think that our genetic code could affect us in traditions and choices so deeply but we have very little problem with reflecting on how it makes us look.

Escaping this is no easy choice, for it is a path of resistance and rebellion to fathers and often the way you were raised. It might be said, it is easier to change your DNA than your traditions, but what if changing your traditions was exactly the process of changing your DNA?

Isaiah 1:18

Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

The process back to strength is laid out as reasonable in changing of traditions that were weak or in error, however easy it may seem not everyone around you sees this as anything less then treason and that may be the hardest part.

In the study of  societies [Researchers noted that a huge divide in the rich and poor played "a central role in the character or in the process of the collapse" of civilizations over "the last five thousand years."] In just that element of class and divide, we see a power struggle began to play out. The roles, like a play, we have been groomed for seem to be the easiest to play, and breaking the cycle requires a certain family austerity.

Matthew 10:34-40 King James Version (KJV)

34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

40 He that receiveth you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.

This huge divide researchers are obsessed with also is raveled in genetic code as it has been discovered entire armies of Egypt and Persians were different in strength and code but over 400 years in captivity may have changed the genetic code of the Israelite or those lead out of bondage by Moses. We see in this Egypt once very strong began to decline and the favor of God rested on those who had been their servants or considered the "poor" among the 'rich.

Isaiah Ch 19:14

"The Lord hath mingled a perverse spirit in the midst thereof: and they have caused Egypt to err in every work thereof, as a drunken man staggereth in his vomit.

In our own society we can see the signs of division or weakness creeping in as Politicians, Judges, and Lawyers have begun representing a broken covenant or change of DNA. This might be summed up as simply as a [denial of the truth] of Obama's Ineligibility as a [natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents in Article II. Section 1, Clause 5. But it is a weakness that has crept in at the hands of those who were not qualified that especially gained steam in 2000 when McCain was eyeballing the Presidency in full knowledge he had an eligibility problem as a native born son and heir of citizenship by soil from and of Panama.

To break a holy covenant a change must first be demanded by a bully. Bullies are cowards at heart having only their honk, bluff, and ego at the front and they come in representing their weakness.

Why would the late Sen. McCain need a naturalization act of Congress to make him a Citizen first, and then non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 to make him a recognized 'natural born Citizen' by half of Congress unless an illegal alteration was craved by a weakness from not being qualified? Why would nine proposed attempts to change 'natural born Citizen' have been docketed by the Congress from 2000-2008 unless that alteration craved legality by the vote of 2/3rds of Congress? They all failed, but that didn't stop the weaknesses from creeping in like thieves creeping in a House for a robbery in what was no less than Treason of the Covenant.

Of course we all know Sen. Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton were co-sponsors of that U.S. Senate Resolution 511. While McCain lost the election, we all know the future positions that Obama and Hillary would usurp. Obama in the Office of the President as a fraud of natural born Citizen requirement, with a fabricated long form birth certificate to highlight it, and Hillary knowing and understanding her accomplice, but capitalizing on it with a loose rein in her ability to prostitute the secretary of state office with foreign campaign contributions and her own private server.

The rest kind of goes down hill from there as we see what James Comey head of the FBI was involved in defending a usurpation of the secretary of state office by failing to recommend and deliver evidence to the Attorney General for a decision to  prosecute or not to prosecute, and that decision being usurped by James Comey from Loretta Lynch. We see Loretta Lynch compromised at the Tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton.

Comey, Yates, McCabe, Rosenstein all signed off on the FISA warrant that was initiated by CIA to the FBI. The December 5th,2018 story at the Hill reads like a reasonable treason protagonist mission impossible mystery novel- 'The addition to the list also comes at a sensitive time, as House Republicans prepare on Friday to question Comey, who signed off on the FISA warrant while remaining an outlier in the intelligence community about the Steele dossier.]

[Most intelligence officials, such as former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, have embraced the concerns laid out in the Steele dossier of possible — but still unproven — collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.]

Where did we start again? Oh yea, Sen. McCain's ineligibility and Sen. Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton as co-sponsors in 2007-2008 Sen Res 511

Cody Robert Judy was one taking the brunt of the injustice as the only Presidential Candidate in 2008, 2012, and 2016 to file in Federal Court against Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama and make my way to a deaf or treasonous United States Supreme Court in covered their ears to my Pleas in Cases 12-5276 ; 14-9396 and Tenth Circuit 17-4055 especially (courtesy copy to Justice Gorsuch)

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BECOMES VOLUNTEER HOMELESS PERSON for JESUS CHRIST 

to Witness Unfair, Unequal, and Economic Bias Treatment of Homeless by all 

Social Organizations, Justice Courts, & Law Enforcement

 involved

2 Corinthians 8:9

For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor, that ye through His poverty might be rich.

When corruption cometh it hireth corruption. The following details part of my own personal experience with being homeless and what injustices, unfairness, and what I call economic targeting is happening within our society, that just might be part of that 'weakness' creeping in the DNA and following suit in Breaking the Covenant.

I have suffered pretty much a total loss of the equipment I purchased to survive the cold winters in Utah.

I had a tent that was stolen, and had to purchase this one approximately Jan 3 in a very cold dipping stretch of temperature  -25 to -33 below zero.

With Storms moving in over the last month nearly every other day or every day I was pinned down. And that is when Ogden City Police decided to make their attack on my property.

The economic targeting is horrible!  And the behavior is criminal. No Notice is given without destroying property first! That is inhumane.



Part I. First Attack










Part II - Second Attack

Part III. Second Attack

Part IV. Second Attack

Third Attack
Part I.


https://youtu.be/X9EleC9nbSs

Part II.
https://youtu.be/C4SezmxpVHU






Parable of the Farmer, Stock Broker, and the Tractor

BREAKING REPORT: IN THE NAME OF EQUALITY - Hillary Clinton MARCHING our little girls TO WAR

BREAKING REPORT: FEATURED EDITORIAL THE POST & EMAIL

-IN THE NAME OF EQUALITY -  

Hillary Clinton MARCHING our little girls TO WAR

Hillary Clinton doesn't care about providing for OUR little girls the same safety net her own life was spared, yet she wants to be Commander-In-Chief heading all of the U.S. Military might. She dodged being drafted as a female, because she was a girl who wasn't required by the draft to sign up. So she wasn't a Draft-Dodger, but she certainly dodged a draft based on what she terms now "inequality".

As a Democratic Party Candidate for President I could not believe when Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders was asked about his "Conscientious Objection" to the Vietnam War and that Hillary Clinton wast not asked how she felt about sending our little girls to WAR when she was protected from a Draft based on being a little girl.

Under an EQUALITY  Banner of Military ALL of our little girls 18 - 30 years of age, (especially single or divorced) would be subject to a War Draft. You have to admit that was NOT something Hillary Clinton had to worry about as a little girl, but it is one she is all for TODAY.

How will our little girls grow up? They will undoubtedly suffer pains that Hillary was pleasantly exempted from and undoubtedly basked in the glow of protections afforded her. What seems attractive in Equality sounds very nice when it comes to receiving the same pay, being admitted into the Priesthood of some Church or Club previously exempting women. However, as the October 13,2015 article taken from the very liberal Huffington Post points out, the demands of EQUALITY, are heading for a real disaster for Millennials, who do not even realize Hillary Clinton is marching them to War.

"If the U.S. military prioritizes "true and pure equality," women might eventually have to register for the draft.

So said Army Secretary John McHugh at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting in Washington on Monday, reports Military.com. McHugh added that the issue -- if and when it arises -- should be determined by Congress, not the Department of Defense."

THE SHRILL OF POWER 

RUNNING UP HILLARY CLINTON'S LEG

Desperate for voters, Hillary Clinton has made no bones about it- she's female- and wants you to vote to put the first women in the Office of the President who also acts as the Commander-In-Chief of the whole U.S. Military.

The right to vote in the U.S. was considered an emancipation for females in the previous considerations of sex or gender in the 19th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

"The right of Citizens of the United States to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State, on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. "

The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870. It defined clearly the right to vote to those regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, stating:

"The rights of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. This gave men who had been slaves, or incarcerated the right to vote regardless of color, but still did not include women as even U.S. Citizens. It would not be until 1920, 50 years later, that women received this Right under the law of our Constitution through the 19th Amendment ratification.

Many thought this was a grievance of inequality and did not understand the protections it actually was affording. It would have been inconceivable for a father to look at his little girl and think about sending her out to have her legs and arms blown off by mortar shells, her teeth knocked out with the butt of a rifle, or worse her "honor", or "maidenhood" defiled in the brutality of war, but that's where true equality is taking us.

In Jakarta Indonesia women recruited for the military are to be virgins. In a May 2015 Article entitled "Why does Indonesia demand the female recruits are virgins?", A hymen test is described as being used to pass the recruits. It is taken very seriously as a matter of "National Security", said Chief Major General Fuad Basya, referring those who were not virgins more subject to what was termed 'bad habits' and said to be warned against in their military and the defense of the country's security and territory being a very high honor.

Still the hymen test was considered by most recruits and doctors to be 'invasive' in the least, embarrassing, and humiliating, even torture said a female military physician that traumatized recruits, as if in the event of war, that would not be the first thing in jeopardy by the enemy in defiance of the Geneva Convention by rogue partitioners.

Women in the United States are not currently required to register for the Draft, but a mother in New Jersey actually sued on behalf of her high-school graduating daughter to change it. "In 2013 the U.S. Department of Defense announced the end of the direct ground combat exclusion rule  for female service members."

The mother stated her daughter was not so much an activist as she was interested in fairness, stating she sure would never have done it. Her daughter did not voluntarily enroll in the military after her graduation either but went off to college to be a vet. We are left with understanding there is a "pretended" equality sought by the majority of women most thinking about wages, and a very small minority willing to put their life on the line in real Equality eradicating the borders of the sexes.

Ask any male how he felt when he was 18 years old, (maybe except Barack Obama based on the abnormalities of his draft registration reported by a law enforcement investigation and the passport break conducted three times by , let's leave the three letter dirty words out of this, and simply refer to John O. Brennan who was then a CEO of Analysis Corp, big contributor to Barack Obama Candidacy, and now heads the CIA not protecting his former employee very well as a witness of the break-in as he was shot in the head sitting out in his car in front of a church )  when he was filling out his Draft Registration Form, about the seriousness of never knowing after that day what day his Country might call him out and put him on a very serous front line of a barraging assaults?

 More importantly ask yourself if your a female between the ages of 18-25, maybe even 30, especially if your single or divorced if you'd respect your Country more for sending you out on the battlefield based on "equality" or if you might feel a little humiliated- traumatized- even tortured by understanding what Hillary Clinton had brought to your world, that she never ever had to face her entire life?

Muammar Gaddafi Libya Primary Leader
1969-2011

After you ask that question Millennials might understand the WOMEN AGAINST HILLARY Movement happening all across America now.

While Hillary Clinton was Senator Clinton, she never cared about equality in sponsoring legislation that would equalize the Draft Registration among sex, but of course she is very enthusiastic amount being Commander-In-Chief and sitting in that luxurious red seat conducting WARS, watching and laughing about it as she did about the unauthorized war toppling Libya's Muammar Gaddafi  which now has become the breeding ground for ISIS. 

The seriousness of Hillary Clinton becoming Commander-In-Chief and almost single highhandedly bringing every little girl in America in a new nightmare and fear of being killed or maimed in war is much more real than the insecurity, and discomfort of a hymen test.

Who can forget the unsavory 12 second reaction caught of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her contempt of a Nations Leader of over 40 years "We Came, We Saw, He Died" and then laughing ridiculously? Even amongst enemies respect must be shown and that respect is translated to entire populations. This is something especially well known and understood by men perhaps based on the blanket of blood provided in the Defense of this Nation and is never something to be gloated over.



It is a very serious matter and the offense of gloating over a win is an unrestrained emphasis of bad behavior or shrill not to tolerated amongst the bravest warriors or made light of in contempt of courage by troops. I wouldn't tolerate it as President.

THE RISKS OF A DRAFT for WOMEN 18-30

The United States is already on a very real course of collision with Powers that are not fooling around or laughing at the seriousness of stability for great populations and civilizations with the economy and security concerns of Nations that much of the peace in the world may very well be jeopardized with in the near future.

Hillary Clinton even as a Candidate for President has already called for essentially what would be a collision course with Russia calling for a no-fly zone in Syria that would undoubtedly conflict with Russia's Air Force staging effective sortie. Obama even called the misdiagnosis a hiccup by Clinton spurred by "political motivation" much like her narrative to the General Public differed in the Benghazi Terrorism attacks linked with her tenure as Secretary of State on 911 and the information related to other heads of states as nothing to do with a video tape which we all learned from the release of her emails in the latest Benghazi hearings was politically motivated.

What this translates into or means is that Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to hide, conceal, and distort the very real ramifications of what she has used to propel her politically upward. Once she is there, our Nation could face a real crisis of Reality to the Equality Question. Hillary has demonstrated a sever distortion of judgement in many and repeated instances when it comes to our Nations security.  When will the 19-25 year old women feel "Hillary's equality" and wish to God they had never voted for her? It is much more likely that they will feel it on the Battle Fields of War then in their Purse over a wage equality.

That day might be the day they are called to register for the Draft under Hillary Clinton who decides that WWIII is a casualty she wishes on her Report Card and that she won't be around as President to have to explain anyway, as millions of our little girls are brought home in caskets or are maimed beyond recognition with their face crushed, their arms and legs blown off in the direct FORCE of EQUALITY?

How do you like Hillary Clinton now? How is the equality working out for you in the seriousness of your vote in the coming 2016 Democratic Party Nominating process Iowa, New Hampshire, and even the General Election if Hillary gets the nodd from the Democratic Party?

My own feeling is that I am losing as a Democratic Party Presidential Candidate. Hillary Clinton leads followed by Senator Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Governor Martin O' Malley. The call for a women to be President is not something that I would not applaud under the right circumstances in our future, but it is not Today to someone who has skirted in her legislative applications, and danced away her National Security collateral in so many instances including not supporting the Constitution's demand for a [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents in the Office of the President as I have spent the last seven years fighting for.

Democrats since 2008 have been on a downward spiral unparalleled in the political races of our Country. It is not even stretch of anyone's imagination.

The REAL DANGER of voting for someone based
on a physical description or outward appearance or
characteristic instead of the Heart or what's inside

The Republicans have ridden Barrack Obama like a horse about as far into the sand as they could possibly ride him while the Democratic Party has kept its head in the sand about anything that pertained to Barack Obama's ineligibility.

It might be that Obama has been protected, but at what cost?

And at what cost will our children pay for the misguided, misidentified, misfortunes, and miscalculations of those who have aligned themselves by pretended circumstances of pity, support, and government dependency?

America is in Crisis. We have got to get her back on track, and while I'm running for President and many think it has just been because Obama was not eligible following my hard work in the some 14 Cases across the Country including 2 United States Supreme Court Cases, my greatest concern, is our children and the future that they will face.

We all are indeed little children inside. I'm still a little boy inside holding the door open for my sister and being considerate for girls. If being a gentlemen has become so foreign in the United States that we all cannot recall why our girls haven't been required to sign up for a Draft in a hot war, then I'm very much afraid the reasons preventing such are also disappearing and we all will learn first hand.

As for my recommendation I do not think things should be equal accept for the opportunity. We should not Draft our little girls. It should be a voluntary enlistment that is held in a very high criteria. That criteria that I would consider would include the willingness of any recruited voluntary female soldier to willingly use sex as a defense for any of her male soldier counterparts in the field of danger or to necessitate their release or capture. That might be a little different then Jakarta's because of the use and dedication of her entire body no different then would be expected from any male counterpart.

That would meet a significant standard of equality in the field in my consideration. Those unwilling to meet that standard I would not consider willing to give all as their male counter parts are.

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

BREAKING REPORT: WAR ON THE POOR EXPLODES IN CONGRESS- PRES. CANDIDATE SEEKS INDICTMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

BREAKING REPORT:

 WAR ON THE POOR EXPLODES IN CONGRESS

  PRES. CANDIDATE SEEKS INDICTMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

BREAKING NEWS: WAR ON THE POOR

RESOLUTION INDICTMENTS SOUGHT BY 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE on ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!!!

2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy is asking both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to pass RESOLUTIONS in their respective bodies that would indict all of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in affect for what he pleads is effectively the worst case scenario on Justice For All - A WAR ON THE POOR.

The following RESOLUTION is being asked to be circulated by every Citizen upon his/her Representative and Senator as the General Public of CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES to every U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative in Congress for the Individual States.

It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easy E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator.

Please Submit the following RESOLUTION to the  HOUSE Judiciary Committee- Constitution and Civil Courts Subcommittee as well as the SENATE Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee- Constitution

IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate

CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION 

Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court

WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty

WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8

WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15

WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR

WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.

WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.

WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.

WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR

BE IT RESOLVED
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.

END

AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT:
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!

www.codyjudy.us

U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY- Subcommittee-Constitution and Civil Justice 

REP. TRENT FRANKS CHAIR
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch

U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution

 SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR

R.M Sen. Durbin

Members:
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter

OPINION 
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.

 It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration. 

Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this: 
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality? 

There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.

Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water? 

Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized  in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as  'prosecutorial discretion'. 

Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?

I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me. 

Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?

No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End. 

Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?

Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.



" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.

"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also.  "  

Thank You! 

Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016

CRJTwitter

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

BREAKING NEWS: SHOCKING POLL! MAJOR SHIFT IN 2016 PRESIDENT POLITICAL LANDSCAPE PREDICTED

BREAKING NEWS: 

SHOCKING POLL! 

MAJOR SHIFT IN 2016 PRESIDENT POLITICAL LANDSCAPE PREDICTED

Polling is a a bit of science and also a bit of influence. June 22nd, 2015, not even two months ago now, a previously unelected Candidate for public office Mr. Donald Trump entered the race recognized as Candidate #511 with assigned Federal Election Commission (F.E.C) No.  P80001571 and in less than two months zoomed to the top of Republican Polls. On the same F.E.C link  notice Mr. Cody Robert Judy also previously unelected is known as F.E.C Candidate #248 with No. P20003372

Many different organizations conduct state and national political polls when they are commissioned to do so by their customers. These customers can include the Candidates themselves as well as other interested organizations who pretty much do not have the time to do it themselves. There are many different methodologies as well as controversy about which method is most accurate.

To conduct a Poll just about all you need is a list of questions and some time yourself to do it. Of course the motive for conducting the Poll is simple for a Candidate for President- an interest of exactly where you stand as a Candidate in any particular State at any given time under prescribed conditions. The phrasing of the questions is probably the single best indicator of reliability of the information, so that is very important.

For instance:
[If the election were held today] gives us a 'Time' and 'Condition'. Today is the "Time" and the 'Election' is the condition. [Would you vote for Cody, Donald, or Jeb] gives us the specific targets by multiple choice as subjects of the time and condition.

• If the election were held today, would you vote for Donald, Jeb or Cody ?
• If the election were held today, would you vote for Donald or Cody?
• If the election were held today, would you vote for Bush, Trump, or Judy?
• If the election were held today, who would you vote for?

There is methodology even in placement of the subjects. For instance a Poll-Taker who doesn't recognize any of the names might be inclined to either vote for the first name he/she hears, or the last name he/she hears spoken. This is where the guessing game starts. Does the Poll-Taker  know and understand who exactly they are being questioned about, under the correct time, and conditions, or is he/she just trying to get through the test so he/she can get back to mowing the lawn? For more information on Polls, who takes them, polling methodology, what the margin of error means exactly we recommend this link.

Of course we have stressed the all important meeting between the Pollster and the Client where the questions are agreed to and phrased exactly the way the Client wants them to be phrased. The reason we have stressed this is because if anything is wrong and an unknown factor comes into play or comes into the arena, the information of the Poll can be completely wrong. It is this factor that makes Polling about as good as throwing your money in the air if the conditions, time, or subjects are wrong.

For instance, every Poll conducted that has Hillary Clinton in it basically assumes she is going to be a Candidate in the race at a particular time either for the Primary or the General Election. But what happens if she is indicted criminally on charges of mis-handling national security secrets and has to drop out of the race? One has to wonder why Mrs. Clinton didn't turn over the server voluntarily if the server was blank as is being reported by FOX ; and how important where the 'Top Secret', Special Intelligence, and NoForn emails that she did turn over that were stored on a server that easily is said to be the victim to the Russians and Chinese Governments?

Pollsters work very hard not to bring into the Polling Question the conditions that might set off a red light to Poll-Takers unless that is exactly the intent. For instance a simply question posed desiring to know the Trust Issue of Mrs. Clinton might be simply - [Do you trust Mrs. Clinton with the Office of the President? ]

Now we compare that question with the question feeding more information to the Poll-Taker:
[Given the recent 'Top Secret' national security emails found on Mrs. Clinton private email server while she was Secretary of State, and her choice not to use a Government protected server based on convenience, do you trust her with the Office of the President? ]

The first question might take advantage of what the Poll-Taker doesn't even know yet, because he is not on the Drudge Report 24/7. You can certainly understand both questions are now very legitimate and relevant questions with the reality of the conditions. Its very interesting how a Candidate begins to Poll well when their name is actually used in the Polling Question as apposed to leaving it up to the Poll Taker and the Main Stream Media's coverage of any and all of the Candidates or lack thereof.

For instance, with no coverage by the National Media, what a shocking realization it is for Democrats to all of a sudden start hearing Democrats when asked, "Who are you voting for if the election were held today?" with no Candidates mentioned say -Cody Robert Judy. That's huge!

So if we factored in the percentage of 'Time' in National Media Coverage per Candidate verses Polling References we might see a 3% Polling factor for Mr. Cody Robert Judy actually represent a much greater influence because he's had no National Media Coverage to begin with. That is what we are seeing!

This factor has lead us to take our own Secret Poll including a more realistic approach for Time, Conditions, and Subjects and we feel it is even more accurate than what the other Candidates, News Organizations, and Super PACS are getting from their Polling Numbers with more relevant conditions being asked representing reality.

RESULTS FROM OUR OWN POLL

500 self described Democrats or leaning Independents Likely to Vote Democratic Party

1. Question of Fairness Importance -Do you feel like the Qualifications for President and Vice President in the Constitution considered by the U.S. Supreme Court should be equally and fairly adhered to by all the Candidates for President regardless of race, color, or gender? [yes or no] 496 Yes 4 No

2.Question of Importance of Holding Prior Office- If Hillary Clinton is indicted on Criminal Charges, would you consider a previously unelected Candidate for President awarded damages by the Supreme Court of the United States to his Campaigns for President in 2008 and 2012  from an illegal Candidate usurping the Office? [yes or no] 500 Yes 0 No

3.Question of Civil Conduct Expectation- Do you feel illegal exemptions to the Qualifications of the Office of the President found in the U.S. Constitution due to race, color, or gender represent 'discrimination' or 'racism' or 'sexism'? [yes or no] 494 Yes 6 No

4. Question of Criminal Intent- Do you feel like a Federal Candidate running for an Office he/she is not qualified for under the U.S. Constitution's requirements represents Fraud upon a Contributor? [yes or no] 495 Yes 5 No

5. How important are [Action v.Words] to you- Cody Robert Judy is a Candidate for President who has a bi-partisan Record legally defending the Qualifications for the Office of the President against McCain/Obama in 2008 and Obama 2012 all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States; Donald Trump has no legal Record of monetary assistance but said on National Television he didn't think Obama qualified.

 Who would you vote for in the General Election:
Cody Robert Judy- Democratic - 455 Winner!
 Donald Trump as the Republican -45

Leading in the Polls - I am very proud of these results! These are legitimate concerns and real legal considerations that are serious. There are always people who will get up and use their popularity in an arena that the popularity is not based in to get elected.

 She was famous- elected to the Congress by a margin of 20,000 votes before the Gulf War and offered to have sex with Saddam Hussein in return for peace in the region. She was not elected at the end of her term in 1991. Ilona Staller of course was elected in the French Parliament in 1985 but in 1983 she had appeared as an apprentice in the hardcore porn film Red Telephone.

To leave out the serious questions that represent our reality today, especially Cody Robert Judy's work and Case currently the longest lasting eligibility Case in U.S. History in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is really messing up all of the current Polling Conditions as well as Subjects and Timing of the cross party lines polling.

"What if" questions certainly are not being considered in today's polling questions by most Polling Companies. The problem with that are the WHAT IF questions that are actually backed up by facts we can all agree today are reality are very important and also are being left out.

That is why we expect a major shift in the 2016 political landscape... yet again within the next two months.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Please join Cody Robert Judy and his overflowing 5000 friends on Facebook on our new 2016 Facebook Site as we close in on another 500 Goal at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016! and Follow CodyRobertJudy2016 on Twitter.

Sincerely,
The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
www.codyjudy.us

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

See the F.E.C  CRJ DECLARATION FOR PRESIDENT

  Cody Robert Judy2016 CandidateDeclaration