BREAKING NEWS: The Roller Coaster Ride of Birthers- COURT UPDATE

The Roller Coaster Ride of Birthers


A fisherman finally casting his prepared and baited hook, line , and sinker out only to have his casted line become tangled on a branch in the middle of the cast grimaces knowing he’s going to have to tear the line down, real in, and start all over. A mother cleans the house spick and span and takes off to do some shopping for supper only to return and find the kids have actually wrecked the whole house in the short twenty minutes she was gone. These are two scenarios’ that come to my mind in reporting to you on an update I have in my Court case Judy v. Obama 1:14cv00093.
When you take off on a rollercoaster ride you hop in the seat eager for the ride, head out on a couple of loop te loops, ups and downs, twist and turns and end up at pretty much the same place you started; with a little more upset stomach. They call it fun, but it really depends on how much your stomach can handle.

If you’re puking your guts out wanting it to be the next day already it wasn’t much fun. Birthers, as most of the Mainstream Media, political junk yard idiots, or just plain old fascist communist ideologues pretending their elite appetites somehow satisfy the criteria they want everyone else to have what they have in common, are standing up for the constitution including the qualifications for the Office of the President. If you are a Birther, which many are beginning to understand signifies a new birth, re-birth, or restoration of a nation; you are well acquainted with the rollercoaster ride of justice when it comes to Barack Obama being in violation of the Constitutional principles we hold dear.

We ride the ride 65% of America agrees with, AND probably 99.9% have never put a dime in to support. It’s a gnarly ride including free falls into rancid swamps, turns into forbidden forest, and climbs into barren waste lands of no relief. Our hearts are strapped on to a cause that is beautiful while most of the world pokes fun, laughs, and jeers at us as foolish and even uneducated.

Why we don’t get off often is a mystery to us. There are stacks and volumes to read that give reason to the cause of communism, a total disbanding of our United States Constitution with hood-wink pictures that are colorful and well orchestrated. These pictures constantly flood our vision clouding our sites with smoke and mirrors to the point that we can’t see what we are fighting for. All we can do is feel it.

We feel the urge to press on. We hear the silent voice inside us say, ‘Pull up your boot straps and press on’. We have no idea of a reward any more than those who were fighting for the freedom and liberties of men in the Revolution or Civil War. All we have is a feeling it will be better. That it is better.

I have a friend in Ukraine who is just gorgeous. She’s easily a 10 on the looks scale. At night she sleeps in a bomb shelter and I’ve communicated with her when she hasn’t had anything to eat for a few days. Her world revolves around trying to scrounge up the money to pay off officials of national security and getting the money to escape her war torn country that has had a near total breakdown of law and order.

Her law and order exist on a bully scale, rather than the scales of a constitutional justice where all men are subject to the law. Her world exists on a plain of those who have positions and those who don’t trying to bribe the ones who do for favors. Yes, she has a beautiful smile, but it has not gotten her out of the mess she finds herself in and she can find no job. She looks to me for help because I’m an American and I have, even in my poor state a hundred times more than she does. Where will she look if there is no United States of America?

You know I see so many pretty faces out there in America, yet so few willing to support what has made the United States of America so great: That of course is the United States Constitution. Republicans have a batter line up of ineligible candidates for President right now that would shame the one the Democrats have in the Office of the White House right now and you still have Republicans claiming we should send our money and vote for them because they are the lesser of two evils.

I wonder how long we have until our own Country Girls are wondering around in such a state of fog and clouded mind that their world has come down to a world of bribery and corruption and there is no one who cares? Well, that answers for anyone the reasons I fight as I do in the legal process of our Judicial Courts. As long as we have Courts of Law to appeal to and as long as we have a Constitutional Standard to guard our backs that is the way we have to fight and that way is the best way.

You know when you start to have neighbors that are aiming at you over the back yard fence with a tank, RPG (that’s a ‘rocket propelled grenade launcher’), and machine guns your court option is pretty much gone. That’s why our Constitution is so important. It keeps your make-up stocked in the stores, new clothes on the rack, and jewelry stocked at Sacs Fifth Avenue and all the other cosmetic features you like to use to stay beautiful, but more importantly walk the aisle of our grocery stores and be thankful for the stocked food on the shelves that a girl just like you no longer has the option of.

Her example is more than a warning for you; it’s a wakeup call for your principles. If you refuse them now it only gets harder for you to ever see them again.

Here are the updates of what has happened and documents currently before the Court. In a nut shell, the Court Clerk refused to pass off a Certificate of Default. I objected to that, and then the Court agreed with the Clerk. That decision basically rendered null and void three testimonies and affidavits.

This placed me back at the beginning of the rollercoaster ride with an upset stomach and my choices were ‘quit’ or request the Court to serve the Defendant’s if, and as was the case, they didn’t like the way that I did.
COURT UPDATE

1- Affidavit for Certificate of Default

2- Response to Notice denying Certificate of Default

3- Request for Service of 9 Summons and Complaints upon Defendants by U.S. Marshal or other Court Agent including Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,Mitch Stewart Jeremy Bird, Jim Dabaki, Matt Lyon involved in DNC and OFA.

Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


As a matter of House Keeping I am pleased to celebrate with you another mile stone marker of 160,600 views here at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com . Without you this wouldn't be possible, so A BIG AND WARM thank you to all who read and pass it on.

As you may know I am a big supporter and contributor to music with 6 albums now under my belt. I recently attended the FIRST ANNUAL UTAH MUSIC AWARDS SHOW dedicated to those musicians and musical roots here in Utah put on my Warren Workman of Workman Productions and it was just a fabulous show. Nathan Osmond and Amy Whitcomb were fantastic MC's and the show was a huge success and gave me a chance to dust off my tuxedo. We had a great evening.

You have seen the lightening in the sky in violations, now read the thunder that Taking A Stand is. Get it as a Nook Book now for only $8.49, or as a Hard Back Cover for 28.95 and or Soft Cover for $22.75.

Taking A Stand 2 Minute Promo Spot



Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


If you agree with us and would like to make a contribution you can do so here.
and THANK YOU!
Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK

FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

Who says being clerk is a lowly job of no particular importance? That is certainly not the case in the U.S. District Court in the State of Utah where the Chief Justice and Presiding Judge Honorable Ted Stewart just handed the Clerk of the Court the responsibility wherein the fate of the whole United States of America and $141 Million Dollars waits with anticipation on the clerks ruling on a "Default Certificate".

Before submitting the Motion for Default and the Proposed Order I called the Clerk stating a Certificate of Default was necessary to which I was told by the Clerk that it was up to the Judge so I made a Motion for Default and an Order up and sent them in. Now I have an Order from the Judge saying that its up to the Clerk.

Its odd working in the same building with multiple Clerks working tirelessly from 8AM to 4PM Monday through Friday for the Judge himself, and other Clerks working in the receiving room that someone didn't mention something at lunch like "oh yea, did you get the Judy v. Obama Certificate of Default up to Chief Judge Ted Stewart? You know the Defendants were served and didn't respond to the Courts Stamped Summons, and its long past the 20 Days that the Court requested an answer or Default by Judgement would be taken against them."

Well its probably because of the work load! I mean who can keep track of these things, thousands or at least hundreds of cases being filed right? What? What was that, this case is number 93? You mean its September and they haven't had 100 cases filed this year yet? Let's see here, between 14 Judges that's 6.6 lets round that up and say 7 cases per Judge and its the end of the 8th month so, a little less than 1 case per month per Judge.

That is understandably a mystery. I'm sorry, perhaps I am being a tiny bit facetious, but that's how I felt when I read that the Chief Justice was going to "leave the determination to the Clerk of the Court in the first instance.", when he could have made a phone call and got the report from the clerk in 5 minutes.

I actually don't believe the Judge didn't make that phone call, or that his personal Clerk didn't say Hi to the Clerks down stairs or some how didn't talk about it at lunch, on their break, or in passing each other in the halls. That just seems like an impossibility to me especially with those kind of names on the case.


So anyway, today I received from the Presiding Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court ((Utah Division)) a August 26th signed MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OF JUDGEMENT on the Motion For Default and Proposed Order that I submitted to him. If you haven't read the Motion for Default or the Order you can do that here and I'd recommend that you do and after we can discuss a little bit of what we can determine based on what we have so far. That's the really fun part of all of this you political and legal crack junkies you. (smile) Hey if you can't have any fun with this or maintain a sense of humor, you really are in danger of losing it all. We can talk some serious things, and we can laugh and crack a joke or two at the same time.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


For anyone wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint you may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Now that you've read it thoroughly and have some idea of what we are talking about, especially the MOTION FOR DEFAULT, you can understand Judge Ted Stewarts first paragraph in the Memorandum Decision.

"This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement.(reference No. 6 docket) In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have been properly served and have failed to appear or otherwise defend within the time allotted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On this basis, Plaintiff seeks a default judgement that includes an award of $141 million in damages."

Can't you just see the Judge looking at his Clerk and very slowly saying, "one hundred forty one million dollars- That's a lot of cash to dismiss in an Motion to Dismiss Default Judgement if it was granted. Whew!"

Before I get to far in to this report, let me just clarify a few basics just in case a few of you decided you didn't want to read the Complaint, the Motion For Default and the Proposed Order. This case actually does something unprecedented in political history! You have probably never thought that a political contribution was an investment that could actually increase in your whole life.

Can't you just see all the contributors of former Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain,Sen. Hillary Clinton's and former Senator Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign scratching their heads right now trying to even comprehend how a political contribution could increase let say a hundred fold. That's where a $25 dollar contribution is refunded as $2500 because the contribution was given with a certain expectation of the 'rules of the race' and having the rules changed and not being notified of the change before the race started actually caused an inconvenience that needed to be reimbursed because of basically fraudulent circumstances?

Well, that's what I've actually proposed in this law suit that I would do to with every person that actually contributed to my campaign because we didn't know the the "natural born Citizen" qualification had been canceled in the U.S. Constitution by Republicans and Democrats presidential candidates in U.S. Senate Res. 511 where Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain all made a deal that it would be changed and every U.S. Senator not apart of that voted for it.

Of course I wasn't there and neither was America or the 300 million Citizens of the U.S. to see the change that a non-binding U.S. Senate resolution had on an Article II of the Constitution that defines the rules and qualifications of the race for President so we just need to get our money back and some damages for not informing us that the U.S. Constitution had been changed, because if we had known it was changed we certainly wouldn't have run the races or contributed our hard earned money.

Can you imagine Mitt Romney doing that? Telling all of his contributors, "Hey you guys deserve a refund and some damages because the rules got changed and I wasn't in on it"? Well, that's kind of what I've said and I think its fair especially when we have a standard and there are rules. So we basically, just get a refund and Obama stays in the Office of the President. Of course that is unless Congress catches wind that a refund has been given to all the contributors based on a breach of the Constitution. Then of course, Congress is free to act as they will given the circumstances.

Those contributing to my campaign I'm sure will be very happy about their refund coming, while there probably will be a few people who contributed to rich Mitt Romney who are still less then satisfied. Oh, so it goes. I mean you certainly get a choice at who your going to support. Can you imagine the disappointment of those who gave to all four McCain, Romney twice, Hillary Clinton, and Obama? They will probably be really disappointed. That's like betting on every horse on the race except the one that won or did some good for you! (hahaha)Who says you have to win the race in order to win on principle? Who says 'principle doesn't pay off?'

Okay, back to the Judge's second paragraph-
"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgement for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Then, "[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain... the clerk- on Plaintiff's request, with an affidavit showing the amount due-must enter judgement for that amount and cost against a defendant who has been defaulted." (reference Fed R. Civ.P 55 (b)(1). However, where, as here, the judgement sought is not for a sum certain, or for a sum that can be made certain, "the party must apply to the court for a default judgement." (reference 3 Id. 55(b)(2)."

That's kind of a mouthful, but I guess what it means is I need to submit an Affidavit to the Clerk, even though a signed Motion and an Order in my mind is kind of the same thing- an affidavit is sworn to and has a specific amount.

Third Paragraph-
"Plaintiff has applied to the Court for a default judgement. However, Plaintiff has not yet received a default certificate as required by Rule 55 (a). Until Plaintiff receives a default certificate from the Clerk of Court, the Court cannot reach the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement. For this reason, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion without prejudice. In so doing, the Court does not reach the merits of Plaintiff's claim of proper service or entitlement to a default certificate. Rather, it will leave that determination to the Clerk of Court in the first instance."
Fourth Paragraph-
"Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement (Docket No.6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 26th day of August, 2014. (Signed by) U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart"

You know I have to say I think that was very nice of Judge Ted Stewart, I really do. You know when I opened the envelope up I thought here we go, another "DISMISSAL in your face you don't know what the word frivolous means do you? YOU MUST BE STUPID STUPID STUPID", type of an ORDER. I don't feel that way at all with this Order. I think it was very concise and I didn't feel STUPID STUPID STUPID, even though and I'm sure he knows, I could easily qualify for that kind of insult legally speaking with years of inexperience rather then the years of experience he has.

You know I'm never offended with intelligence and quality and I've got a pretty good eye at recognizing quality. Yes, even in my ex-wifes. I sure didn't marry them because they weren't quality women. I never thought to myself, " I wonder why I married her?". I knew why I did, and never regretted it with all three.

So now let's briefly discuss what Judge Stewart didn't do, that he actually could have. If for instance he had DISMISSED the Motion with PREJUDICE or DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT as frivolous that would be the end..good night..turn off the lights. You don't bother the Courts again with this. That's it. He did'nt do that and I love him because he didn't do that and he could have.

There is nothing that means more to my heart then 'good judgement'. Its for me like admiring a supreme performance by a reining horse that spins like a top and slides 60 feet on a lose reign with just a few cues from the rider. That to someone else might be like admiring a really rare piece of art and understanding the artist, the history, and value of a favorite collection, or how about a mother who tries to explain the beauty of her sleeping child as her heart swells with joy this child brings her?

I know it sounds strange, but losing a race the best that you can is every bit as important as winning with your best effort. If you give it all you got and lose, its okay to walk away. When I think about all the "likes" I've got on facebook from the general public people who don't even know me, and their sharing what I've written I am so humbled and filled with gratitude. Its just amazing. When ever I've received a contribution in the mail or on line from my web site I've remembered to thank God for that and treated it just as honorably as the widow's mite Jesus pointed out was so valuable.

Well, that's all the news I have to report today for those you following this case and interested in it. Thanks for sharing and caring.., You really do mean the world to me and I thank you.

If you'd like to contribute to the ABC Campaign (American Birther Campaign)for Cody Robert Judy U.S. President 2016 you can do so on the contribution page of www.codyjudy.us

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Breaking News:Default Document Update Judy v. Obama 2014- Ruling by Race or the Constitution?

Breaking News:Default Document Update Judy v. Obama 2014- Ruling By Race or the Constitution?


Obama shouted out, “That’s horsesh*t!” He was on the defensive from attacks by his own former Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton as she assuaged his actions in Syria lamenting 170,000 who were dead and parlayed it was Obama’s fault for not sending in training, arming, and otherwise supporting Syrian rebels opposed to Syria’s president Assad for using chemical weapons on his population. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/11/exclusive-obama-told-lawmakers-criticism-of-his-syria-policy-is-horsesh-t.html

Police fired tear gas at rioter's and looters in Syria...oh.., wait a minute, it was in Ferguson, Missouri.

St. Lois QuickTrip,Walmart,Kmart,County Shoe Carnival,Foot Locker,PNC Bank,Hibbetts Sports,Beauty Supply and Wig Store,Family Dollar,Boost Mobile,DTLR,Taco Bell,Remy Beauty Supply,Cricket Wireless,Phillips 66,Energy Express,Pawn Shop,Target,JC Wireless,Firestone,Dollar General,Up N Up Fashion,Several Burglaries,T-Mobile,Second QuikTrip,Shoe Carnival in South St. Louis City we're all last night all by looters.

Tear gas, formally known as a lachrymatory agent or lachrymator (from lacrima meaning "tear" in Latin), is a non-lethal chemical weapon that stimulates the corneal nerves in the eyes to cause tears, pain, and even blindness. Common lachrymators include pepper spray (OC gas), CS gas, CR gas, CN gas (phenacyl chloride), nonivamide, bromoacetone, xylyl bromide, syn-propanethial-S-oxide (from onions), and Mace (a branded mixture).

Lachrymatory agents are commonly used for riot control. Their use as chemical warfare agents is prohibited by various international treaties. During World War I, increasingly toxic lachrymatory agents were used.

Could the use of chemical weapons upon Americans now be laid at the feet of Obama? Were the pursuits of Syrian citizens for safety in their shops and homes any less valuable to Asadd as the security and safety asked for by Lauree Salmon who said,"We feel for all households for the safety of all families. We want the National Guard to be brought in, we can't afford another night of what we went through"?

Police shot and killed a black man and the justice for it erupts into an all out binge of looting, riots,and revenge upon the whole community? How is it Hillary Clinton thinks Syrian rebels should be armed, trained,and educated in Syria but she doesn't see the need for it in St. Lois,Missouri?

Oh, that's different? Is it really? America needs to wake up to the hypocrisy laid at their feet here. Why aren't the looters and rioters armed with rpg's, and why are black people still looking for justice or an excuse to run rampant into stores for some free stuff if Obama's magical long form birth certificate and social security card are legit and ruling by race is better than ruling by the Constitution?

Why are the heads of foreign states held accountable for local up risings and hoodlums but our own national leaders are excused? I think you understand my point here. How can we excuse ourselves from not seeing the problems at home first while we point fingers abroad? People need to understand the conundrum of arming rebels of foreign states and the reluctance to furnish the same arms to rioters in St. Louis Missouri. Where is Hillary Clinton on properly arming and educating the looters and rioters with the good stuff, some heat seeking missiles and tank artillery? Yeah, its a little ludicrous to think there is a difference when you start asking shop owners in Syria and Ferguson.

How do we nationalize local problems abroad holding foreign state leaders responsible but localize them so well here in the U.S. removing Obama from problems in Missouri especially when it comes to domestic issues? This tendency is going to get us in more and more trouble. The results of that phenomenon have billions of tax dollars being wasted, miss used, and manipulated for political gains here.

Obama's race and ability to rule by race rather than using the Constitution starting with his own lack of eligibility has little to do with leading and Hillary Clinton has demonstrated here lack of trust in the U.S. Constitution supporting Obama. She may try to distance herself from him now, but her heart is quite attached as she has demonstrated for 6 years and continues to demonstrate by not taking a stand for the eligibility requirement in the Constitution for the Office of the President. Is Mrs. Clinton a racist because she put race ahead of the Constitution?

How is it Attorney General Eric Holder and the FBI are involved with criminal behavior with the poor black folks wanting justice while they are looting and rioting over a police shooting that left a black man dead, yet the head law enforcement agent and agency in our domestic backyard, make no bones about Obama putting out a forged long form birth certificate and fake draft registration? Is that a form of black on black violence happening that we all should be outraged over,or is it not seen that way by Democrats?

Mother of the slain black man rioters are upset about being shot.

Its the hypocrisy of our government that people can't stand. It encourages riots, looting, and criminal behavior because they get away with it, the incentive is there for others. Quite a few potential presidential candidates for 2016 are followed by the media that have done nothing, absolutely nothing about the outrage of ruling by race rather than ruling by the Constitution. The difference is an inequality among races that is an outrage!

You can google what Rand Paul,Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Hillary Clinton said about Barack Obama's policy, but what have they done about Obama's ineligibility and the Constitutional Crisis we are in right now because of it? I struggle with other presidential candidates even having a leg to stand on when they criticize Barack Obama about any policy and dismiss their own inaction in taking a stand for the Constitution that is violated with Obama's ineligibility. Has Obama, or have they provided a service to our Country in this?

People might say I don't criticize Obama's policies enough like Republicans and Democrats do, when the criticism amounts to a tacit endorsement of the Constitutional violation of his very real lack of qualification per the U.S. Constitution. If Obama's not eligible for the Office of the President do you think any of his policies are legit? I mean it really is like daring a 6 year old to drive a car without a license and than pulling him over and ticketing him for not signaling.

There are a few people who point to my own conviction 20 years ago as some indication of lawlessness, when it fact it serves as just the opposite. In fact there is a lively discussion about that under amazon discussion under the heading of sensible examination of Obama's long form certificate of life birth or COLB. When my law suit against Obama was brought up in the discussion as interesting, the only thing relative to that was a prior conviction 20 years ago? Its unreal what mysteries the left and right are willing to grasp at in order to prove a point rather than sensible facts and it goes to the heart of what's wrong in American Politics and why people are losing faith and confidence in the law.

Amazon.com discussion Sensible Examination Obama COLB -In reply to an earlier post on Aug 8, 2014 3:54:59 PM PDT
Jimmy E. says:
Cody Robert Judy is indeed your garden variety birther:
JUDY PLEADS GUILTY TO `BOMB' THREAT
By Jim Rayburn, Staff Writer
Thursday, June 3 1993
http://www.amazon.com/sensible-examination-Obama-LFCOLB-file/forum/Fx3O0GUS5OOQ7GV/Tx1R9VV7LL35QA2/376?asin=1936488299


I saw a really poignant saying the other day on facebook that I think is very relevant: "When your past calls, don't answer. It has nothing new to say." (smile) Personally its amazing to me to see Democrats who are so willing to excuse Obama's identity fabrications by slamming me with a violation for protesting. They excuse Hillary Clinton from leaving Ambassador Stevens and the others who actually died behind while distancing and gracing her with distance from Obama on 9-11 (September 11th,2012) just two years ago, but pounce on me for something that amounted to an unarmed vocal protest where no one was hurt, no property damage occurred, and I spent 8 years in prison for over twenty years ago?

So I've paid for any trouble and every political leader not opposing Obama are guilty of misprision of felony, the only thing lacking is the prosecution and sentencing? I mean what's worse the illegal action happening today among and abroad with our political leaders, or the one dearly paid for with obscure and sensible reason for excusing twenty years ago that was a protest in a religious meeting that was actually quite legal if you actually allow the facts to stand for themselves? If your not willing to do that, then of course your satisfied with the exactness of punishment served?

Responsibility comes in many sizes, shapes, and forms but one thing you will not hear from Democrats or Republicans is an appreciation for me taking on the responsibility for others mistakes just to sure up any and all differences. Has Obama taken on the responsibility for the looters and rioters in St. Lois Missouri? Does he want to? I can tell you it is really hard to do, and when that happens its called a sacrifice. But what is really an ultimate insult is when people deny the facts of my case in a religious setting with a religious book as proof of the protest abbreviated B.O.M. and they print 'fake-bomb'. Its really an insult to facts printed by the Media, much the same way Obama's covered up identity is coddled by the Main Stream Media. Most people would agree the Media is involved in a huge cover up.

People have asked me how I got to be such a good lawyer?(I'm smiling)Well, fighting for your life is a good motivation. I really can say I had no interest in politics before I went to prison in 1993 twenty-one years ago, but the experience of losing my Constitutional Rights as an individual sure came home to roost in my lap all of a sudden, but I am so grateful for that experience now.

If I had not had that experience do you think America would even have one single Presidential Candidate who stood up against McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012 and said "No, you are not qualified" and I don't care what your race is? Republicans and Democrats don't want to discuss this with me, they want to discuss a 'criminal conviction' they also want to distort the facts. That is not even sensible or reasonable.

I believe in the American People, black,brown,white,red, and I don't care what color you are because it doesn't matter when the Constitution is kept afloat. When the Constitution is buried you better believe your going to see race and religion rule and woe be unto you if you are not in the majority of that riot!

Many people have a difficult time understanding or even comprehending my passion for the very beautiful United States Constitution. I myself can not even imagine being a minority and not being swooned by the powerful purposes of her principles, one of which just happens to be that, 15th Amendment 'no prior servitude shall be held against you' in running for a federal office or voting. One in five Americans on parole, probation or incarcerated lets you know I understand being a minority.

What a magnificent tool I have been given in spotting people who hate the Constitution and have clearly marked themselves as domestic enemies of our freedoms and liberties. All they have to do is light a match about my past servitude and they manifest themselves as haters of the Constitution. It doesn't take to much digging to find them on the out skirts of the loving Constitution's warm blanket and in the realms of a loathing cold case of communism and tyranny willing to take away freedoms and liberties and even your food while you look at them behind the barbed wires of the prisons they feel you're safer in.

I have a first rate understanding of the injustice minorities might feel, especially if the justice of the Constitution is no where to be found inside America. That to me is a wonderful service I have to offer everyone as President of the United States of America. When the power is given to you to turn your life around using the trials you have faced in a positive way a great light is yours to hold.

That opportunity I believe is what stands so supreme in America and makes her exceptional. Fighting for those exceptional principles are really what I call being engaged in a good cause that serves everyone. America should not be involved in being a police force for the world to call upon as some pathetically weak regime who cannot change the hearts and minds of men based on the poor example that is in the Office of the President or the poor examples of potential presidential candidates who mindlessly utter critics without doing or following up their rhetoric with actions that speak as loud as their words.

I am grateful for the internet where so many people can actually research the facts about me and do not have to be the subjects of a biased and false news report. I believe people are intelligent enough to understand basic facts and I think most 5 year olds can see through hypocrisy much easier than parents give them credit, why not an adult voter?

There maybe some bitterness in me about my lengthy and illegal incarceration the likes of which I don't think any one would want to face what I have faced for standing up for what was right, which I can always debate with people who are willing to be open minded and actually weigh things in the balance of justice. Why debate with fools who have no intentions, or heart, for justice and have long ago sold themselves out for a window of bars and a steal door slamming behind them as a reward for their deeds as they reap what they have sown.

If the sum total of feeling worthiness for the Office of the President revolves around spouting your mouth about issues of the past that you had power and a choice to change but refused in your elected or appointed office of trust with the American People, why doesn't the oath of the President involve that? You know the oath of the President is different then U.S. Reps and U.S. Senators just like the qualifications of those offices are different. "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution" is in the oath of the President within the Constitution and in the oath of a Representative and Senator is the only the word "Support" the Constitution.

Do you think our U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators are supporting the Constitution when they wink at Obama's qualification? Do you think Obama is preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution as he is a walking talking violation of it in his ineligibility? Do you think Americans are impressed with that? Well, their disapproval is certainly at an all time high and the approval of the Congress and Obama at an all time high. Maybe,.. just maybe Americans are not impressed and are looking for something, oh, I don't know, a little more real?

Here is an update on the Court Proceeding Judy v. Obama 1-14-cv-93 and the process I have to go through to get a Default Judgement signed by the Judge in the U.S. District Court.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate
Script for the Video Below for those who would rather read it-

"Good Morning - I'm Cody Robert Judy Candidate for U.S. President 2016 and I have some news I'd like to report to you that effects each and every American from sea to shining sea.

On July 7th,I filed in the U.S. Federal Court, District of Utah, a Civil Rights Law Suit for damages to my candidacy for President in 2008 and 2012 as well as the ongoing damages in my 2016 candidacy thus far.

With my complaint and attached to it were the 20 day Summons of the defendants that included, Barack Obama - The Democratic Party Leadership, as well as Barack Hussein Obama's Organization for America- In sum, those responsible corporations for the campaigns of Barack Hussein Obama.

Approximately a week later my motion to proceed was granted by the Court's assigned Judge and I received copies of the Summons I had delivered to the Court the prior week, in the mail, to be served.

The Court stamped Summons were served to the Defendants at the Democratic Party Headquarters, along with the Complaint July 16th and a Return Summons was filed in the Court the same day.

On July 21st Notice of a change of Judges was recognized by the Court in the form of an Order of Recusal by Judge Jenkins and Chief Judge Ted Stewart was reassigned for all further proceedings. That order signed by Judge Jenkins July 15.

The twenty day Summons served and Return of Service to the Court filed July 16th allowed Defendants to respond and oppose the facts so stated by August 5th, with a mailing of 3 days August 8th at the latest.

Page 2.

Forty years ago on August 8th,1974 President Richard Nixon announced his resignation. As Americans we celebrated truth and transparency that day from the cover up of just one person who happened to be, at that time, in the Office of President.

Today is August 9th, neither the Court nor I have received any dispute of the facts so stated in the complaint that presented evidence Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified under the United States of America's Constitution.

The facts are undisputed, in the U.S. Court, a nefarious cover up has taken place involving fraud and forgery, involving one person, who just happens to be in the Office of the President.

Undisputed facts in a recognized U.S. Court of law that amounts to an admission of guilt - an admission that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President according to the standard of the United States Constitution.

Ladies and Gentlemen today we celebrate transparency and truth- God has blessed America. I want you to pass this on to your Congressmen because it is Congress's responsibility to recognize facts the Judicial Branch has served.

I'm Cody Robert Judy and may God continue to bless America.

Here is an update on the Court Proceeding Judy v. Obama 1-14-cv-93 and the process I have to go through to get a Default Judgement signed by the Judge in the U.S. District Court.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093




Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.



The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

How Can Obama Avoid a Jury Trial?

How Can Obama Avoid a Jury Trial?

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Part III. of the Exclusive Interview I did with the Editor-in-Chief Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email has been published today which you can read here. I certainly don’t want to take anything away from the Interview she has spent so much time doing, but I will elaborate just a little bit on the Judy v. Obama 2014 case. The 20 Summons by the Court is basically due today, so the Defendants will have it filed in the Court or at least stamped by the U.S. Postal Service today.

The courts allow 3 days for mailing time but do expect a post mark at the very least today. If the Complaint is answered electronically today is indeed the last day to get that to and filed in the Court.

What I want to discuss today is a little bit more of what I am thinking we should expect and why. I actually don’t expect an answer to be filed and the biggest reason for that is because Obama et al., in my humble opinion wants to avoid a Jury Trial which of course was demanded in the Complaint.

The reasons for that are multi-faceted. Normally, you would expect that if a “Jury Trial” was avoided by the Defendants that the Justice would come down on the defendants as if a Jury Trial had actually happened and they were found guilty, and the full measure of what the law would allow would be handed down as kind of a reprimand for not responding to the Court’s 20 Day Summons for a response, but that isn’t necessarily the case anymore then taking a decision out of 12 people’s hands and putting it in one persons hands would net the same decision.

By not responding at all, Obama basically eliminates 12 People hearing the evidence, and puts the Judge in charge of what to do. I as the Plaintiff do not receive any reward for Obama not responding without of course a Judge’s Order, either following the Jury’s recommendations or an Order of the Judge’s own legal sentence in the form of an Order.

Although the Judge is not supposed to act as an attorney for the Defendants, that process can be postulated with the Judge’s Decision on whether to grant or deny the demands of the argument based on the legal analysis of the facts of the case under his authority. Included in that arsenal are the slightest technical requirements, jurisdiction disputes, and even the laws disputed in the case upon which his expert analysis forms a decision, for or against the Plaintiff as well as for or against the Defendant.

In a sense even without a disputing attorney for the Defendants, the Judge has authority to throw out a case if it doesn’t meet a standard of basic legal correctness. This of course is easier to do with a pro se litigant who hasn’t been to law school and is hoping and doing the best he can with the little he does know.

Practice of course makes almost anything easier from mowing your own lawn to pitching a golf ball to within three feet of the hole for an easy putt. Although I’ve had a few cases I’ve had to take to Court myself, I in no way would compare my experience to that of a legal professional who is seasoned in legal filings and argument.

Of course this doesn’t even account for the possibility that the Judge just plain out makes a wrong decision that a higher panel of Judges would overturn throwing the case back to the lower court. That can happen to and does so nearly every day.
In a perfect form Justice would necessarily see right through a Defendants decision or choice not to respond as a thumb-in-the-eye to the authority of the Judicial Branch in interpreting the law. This actually happened to me already one time with Obama in an executive court of law or administrative law court in Georgia in the Ballot Challenge in Georgia in 2012.
Obama was summoned to that Court and required to file an answer. The secretary state of Georgia even remarked directly to Obama’s attorney that if he chose not to answer he did so at his own peril. Judge Malihi in that case offered a default to the attorneys fighting the case, which they refused opting instead to argue facts to the Judge. The Judge basically acted as Obama’s attorney and made a defense for him.
There is a big difference in the standard of law requirement for review in an executive branch court and a judicial branch court. They are after all basically in two completely different branches of the Government. Anyway, in that particular experience we saw Obama didn’t show up and it certainly didn’t work to his peril.

This case is not an “Election Case” as a Ballot Challenge is or was prior to an election. This is completely different and those who choose to lump them together are mistaken in their legal analysis. A Ballot Challenge is not a Civil Rights Complaint by any stretch of the imagination, although I’m almost positive every public opinion arguing for Obama’s side would like to lump them together.

So to say we know what, or how or why the Judge is going to rule on this case based on the history of Obama’s successes to skirt the law or manipulate the law so as not to be held accountable as has happened in the past cases due to jurisdiction, technical errors, or lack of standing might happen, but there is also an argument that it is not appropriate in this case that is indeed not a ballot challenge or a law suit against any State’s Secretary of State.

The appropriate conduct for myself as a Plaintiff is to simply remind the Court with a Notice for a Decision on the Defendants’ failure to respond to the Court issued 20 day Summons probably this Friday (August 8th, 2014).

We will know something if no answer is filed by the Defendants’ for me to respond to from the Judge in the case within 30 days. The Judge will have a broad discretion from which to make a decision and I’m certain he will make that decision according to law, the least of which could include slamming Obama for not filing an answer, if no answer is filed.
I have no illusive conclusions of that being necessarily in fact granted in this case, but it would be a fool’s mind who says it’s not possible. Indeed the possibility exist that a monetary Order is made that demands full reparations based on damages according to statutes and applicable laws requiring such. The possibility also exist that Felony Charges are leveled, and a Judge by Order assigns them to an Attorney General for Formal Criminal Charges and to deny otherwise denies principles established by The Sherman Act.

By not answering however, Obama et. al., does accomplish one thing. They basically make the silent argument they do not want this brought before a Jury Trial. If you are playing the odds on the merits of the case, I think Obama understands bringing in a Jury Trial opens a can of worms much less controlled then pinning this on one person, or the Judge.

Let me say, I don’t like particularly being the person bringing the action before the Judge. I do feel a responsibility as a Candidate for President to fulfill the qualifications of the Office if I were so elected and at the very least recognizing legally in my standing as a Candidate a responsibility to those who have contributed to my campaign as well as the oath I took as a Candidate in pointing out if someone is not.

People that contributed to my campaign should not be held responsible for a loss of their contributions on an illegal merit of another Candidate in the same race, or for that matter losing their confidence in me because I kept my mouth shut when a blatant violation and foul of the rules happened.

Maybe Mitt Romney and John McCain can keep their mouth shut but I think in 2012 as well as 2008 it was a real dis-service of the faith and credit towards those contributing to their respective campaigns and much less than what their contributing public deserved. As you know that is a staggering amount of money; Amazing to thing that just in the presidential contest of 2008 and 2012 1.4 Billion Dollars was used just on the Democratic Party side of Obama.

At the same time, I cannot imagine a Judge either, filled with any sense for Justice, really being excited about having a case like this put in his lap. Even though appeals can be made either way with any decision, this is a really heavy burden. At stake might be one of the greatest David v. Goliath stories in our history as the individual is pinned up against the Giant Collective of such a large amount of money, support, and cover-up.

Will or can the law under the principles of ‘justice for all’ hold up one individual and and repel the massive tsunami of corruption? One might ask could any one man part a 200 foot tidal wave coming in? Of course the odds say once something gets that big it can’t be taken down. We’ve even been conditioned to the saying, “To Big to fail”.

I would certainly concur if I thought we were depending on our own selves, but I don’t. I think sacrifices of time, talent, and money as well as the very lives of those who have perished make a bigger force than the one collectively acting as an adversary to the Constitution’s demands and that while it is a big problem; big problems can be solved one baby step at a time adding up to the correct answers.

The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.

Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.

Breaking News:Presidential Candidate TV Commercial Targets Obama's I.D. Fraud & Qualification in 2014 Civil Rights Action

Breaking News:Presidential Candidate TV Commercial Targets Obama's I.D. Fraud & Qualification in 2014 Civil Rights Action
FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

A new Television Spot has just been made that features the problems America faces now rooted in the neglected requirement that a "natural born Citizen", (Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents),has been compromised in the United States Constitution's Qualification demanded for the Office of the President that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro occupies and does not meet.

Along with the 25 scandals already reported, a new one with the flood of illegal immigration is now the daily horror of nearly every state that borders the nation of Mexico with an excited emphasis on minor children, though the average age of those crossing illegally is about the age of an army recruit at 17 or 18.

Director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies- Jessica Vaughn said, “There’s more financial aid available to illegal immigrants than there is for the average taxpayer.” President Obama now has asked Congress for $3.7 billion the House said "No" in a July 11th report.

The money request included tending the legal ramifications that are adding up on both sides of the coin. Earlier this month the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled that a Mexican teenager killed on Mexican soil by a Border Patrol agent who claims he was being pelted with rocks had rights under the U.S. constitution. His family is suing for $325 million.“We welcome this suit with open arms,” says Cheryl Little executive director of Americans for illegal Immigrant Justice.

To understand why attorneys are gathering at the gravy line, The Department of Justice would be given $15 million to hire attorneys to defend unaccompanied minors against deportation in removal proceedings before an immigration judge. An additional $1.1 million would be allocated for "immigration litigation attorneys" who, presumably, would assist adult illegal immigrants in their proceedings.

“The president is asking U.S. taxpayer to spend millions to help illegal immigrants who knowingly broke our laws to avoid deportation,” says Vaughn. “The federal government is undercutting its entire mission. No one is defending our law.”

One of the arguments that the U.S. House Judicial Committee heard in 2000 when the 'natural born Citizen' requirement for the Office of the President clause was attacked was indeed the sympathies for a foreign nation that a person who was a first generation American naturally had that compromised the Office of the President's duties to protect, preserve, and defend the U.S. Constitution as well as the inhabits of all the Citizens.

No one seems to be able to explain the difference between illegal immigration numbers increasing like a flood when Obama entered the Office. Even border state Governor of Arizona Jan Brewer saw no reason her constituents would be affected with a requirement presidential candidates prove they were eligible that her Arizona Legislator put together termed the "Birther Bill" she vetoed.

Gov. Brewer saw no connection between a secure border as a national defense to the natural born Citizen clause as a national defense. Texas Governor Rick Perry, another pounding his chest at the influx of 40,000 illegally crossing a month now finds no reason to use his bully pulpit as an alarm bell for the safety of his own Citizens in Texas in an acknowledgement that Obama is not a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President, even while he deploys 1,000 of his own states national guard and contagious diseases begins permeating his own state as is being reported. The crux of the action is Gov. Perry see's it as a way to make money as he sends the bill to Congress to pay for it.

One must wonder while the new foreign army is being imported for the duty tax on the tax payers back, and it is dispersed throughout the entire United States with whole communities seeing their school class rooms over run with the influx where the protection is for our own children? Are the stories of infected border agents and their losses understood or recompensed as a first priority; are communicable diseases like polio, tuberculosis, scabbies, std's and lice welcomed like the money attorney's make being welcomed in as aliens cross the border?

We all recall the sigh of A.G. Eric Holder's contempt of Congress and "unintended consequences" in the Obama's Administration's Fast & Furious Scandal that exported weapons to drug cartels with the supposed noble intentions. Now we are seeing the open borders marginalized with the noble tale of 'saving the children'?

Exporting weapons and then importing aliens seems to be policy for Obama, but would you expect less from a person who is not a 'natural born Citizen' qualified for the Office of the President? Obama thinks because he was elected under the fraudulent circumstance of his 'actually being a qualified natural born Citizen' with the use of identity scandalous weapons like a forged long form birth certificate, forged draft registration, and a fraudulent social security card, that he is under a mandate to bring to fruition the contempt upon which he was elected.

Obama hopes that if this fraud and deceit were actually uncovered as a lie that the people of the United States would still elect him unconditionally because they love him, even though he felt it necessary to employ the deceptive tools that actually created a civil rights violation upon every Candidate running against him in the election. Of course most of the major candidates didn't care as in Sen. McCain 2008 and Gov. Romney 2012 because they already had made a deal with Obama in non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 to keep their mouths shut.

Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain all came together against the people's directive of the United States Constitution to form a secret combination of illegally compromising the requirement for the Office of the President. As the executive branch's leader, this effectively left the entire U.S. Government without a qualified means of actually enforcing the law.

The frustration of Congress with the 'disability' extolled under violations of discussions in the 14th Amend. Sec 3 and the 25th Amendment , was expounded in the 2014 "Enforce the Law Act" passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, and is also in consideration of a new law suit the House is undertaking expressed by majority House Speaker Rep. Boehner.

Its an interesting point to focus on with Rep. Boehner's desire and claim to make Obama, who is a violation of the law in the 'natural born Citizen' clause, 'enforce' the law, while Rep. Boehner totally ignores the requirement for a 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President. That is something that Congress is responsible for.

The whole situation is breeding nothing but contempt for law in the origins of Obama not being qualified under the Constitution's Law, which is the Supreme Law of the Land, supposedly. Along these lines also comes the responsibility of the Media to report the violations to the people which is not happening in the Main Stream Media, partly because Republicans and Democrats are in on it together and partly because the media is actually being intimidated with reprisals as was also a focus of scandal with the Associated Press reporters being spied on for intimidation leverage by the Department of Justice directly under Obama's thumb.

The script of the new commercial is as follows:

"I'm Cody Robert Judy - Candidate for U.S. President 2016
Our Nation is being run-over illegally like my Campaigns for President were in 2008 and 2012

I took a stand for our Constitution's Qualifications for the Office of the President against both McCain and Obama, as the law applied equally, neither being, "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents",

Over 25 scandals have erupted the last two years from the assaults on our borders, ineptitude in foreign policy, to the very real intimidating reprisals against the Main Stream Media.

This is an abomination of desolation set up against our Republic. We can't stand for secret combinations set up like U.S. Sen. Res 511 with McCain, Clinton, and Obama conspiring to destroy the qualifications for the Office of the President.

We can't fight with one hand tied behind our back either. In Judy v. Obama 2014 we leave forgery, fraud, and deceit behind.

Please help me at www.codyjudy.us Contribute Today, for a Healthy American Republic Tomorrow. "

The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.

Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.