Natural Born Citizen - Why Republicans Failed National Security

-Natural Born Citizen -

 Why Republicans Failed

 National Security

Some have wondered, some have guessed, but a few have known that the cover up on Obama's Ineligibility was in plain sight. So why have Republican Leaders in Congress as well the Courts , champions of so-called "National Security" , not followed Law & Order, set up a system for some that's different for others, and disqualified Obama as a Disability to the Office of President if he's Ineligible for that Office?

The answers may surprise you, but first let's take a detailed look at what [ natural born Citizen ] means and the Qualification of Time it spans as if Congress were the children and knew nothing, because that seems to be the biggest defense these days for Presidential Candidates, "I didn't know" , "it was a matter of convenience" , and of course there is , " I don't want to be labeled a Racist".

First we can primarily and elementarily understand that there is something different about [natural born Citizen] because the Qualification in the U.S. Constitution for the Offices of a U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator is [Citizen].

If Congress is only authorized to Adopt [Citizens] through the [ naturalization ] process, we can rule out any circumstance they have supposed in any naturalization Acts as being [natural born Citizen].

With all types of Citizenship we understand there are only two variables that can vary in ascertaining types of allegiance. The Place can vary and basically announces the Law or Jurisdiction of Law you were born under. Your Parents in the U.S. are both able to vote, so are considered relevant in an inherited citizenship.

Now, if your Mom or Dad cannot Vote in America they have what is called a foreign or alien allegiance to the United States of America. Thus if you're a child of a mixed or divided parental allegiance you inherit that divided allegiance plainly just like you inherited half your genetics from both parents.

The different scenarios or circumstances of Birth have all been considered by Congress in the naturalization acts that make a child a U.S. Citizen, but remember we did not say [ natural born Citizen ].

There is only one definition of [ natural born Citizen ] that is definitely missing from Congressional naturalization Acts and that definition is [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. The reason of course is it was never doubted, by anyone, that a Nation could propagate it's own population.  To deny such would be treasonous to the Nation itself and it would be an act-of-subversion or war to declare such population by another Nation.

Excerpt in Red Reads: [I find know fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born [within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language  of your Constitution itself, a natural-born citizen]; but sir, I may be allowed to say further, that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power or color of power to say that [any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States.] Citizenship is his birthright and neither the Congress  nor the States can justly or lawfully take it from him. But while this is admitted, can you declare by congressional enactment as to citizens of the United States within the States that there be no discrimination among them of civil rights?]

The accommodations of the three variables then exist between foreign soil, foreign father and foreign mother. You could be born on U.S. soil to foreign parents and the naturalization act known as the 14th Amendment assist your claim of U.S. Citizenship, not [natural born Citizenship].

The verbiage is clear in the 14th Amendment - [All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.]

Did it say [ natural born Citizens] ? No, it says [citizens]. So, why would anyone suppose all Obama had to be was born in the U.S. to be a [natural born Citizen]? If you think about it, the thought of forgetting the word [citizen] in the 14th Amendment and [natural born Citizen] in Art. II. Sect.1,C-5 is "delusional" or in other words a denial of Facts.

It's also delusional to think Congress can adopt [ natural born Citizens]. That would be like two parents saying they wanted to Adopt the child they both were natural mother and father to. The Court's would laugh at such a delusion as an absurdity. They don't have to. They are the mother and father.

So the 14th Amendment makes clear those born in the United  States of America are Citizens and respectively in defining the Union of State's, declares, [and of the State wherein they reside ], didn't say territory or accupied piece of foreign soil like Panama for Sen. McCain.

Sen. McCain was not born in a State of the Union. He was in fact [naturalized] by an Act of Congress. It's delusional or a denial of facts to say otherwise.

The Office of President/VP/ was the ONLY office RESERVED and PRESERVED for the Nation of The United States of America. Obama says things have changed and essentially the blurred lines of the Internet cable , shared WiFi air space, and commerce between Nations that the United States of America is not so. Obama is delusional. We have borders, laws against illegal immigration, as do other Nations.

[Obama has said he worked to make the re-establishment of diplomatic ties between the United States and Cuba“irreversible,”Everything Obama did to open Cuba could be revoked because it was all done through executive action and regulatory changes, the latter of which were more formal but can be reversed.]

UPDATE: Nov. 26,2016 Fidel Castro has died:
(May he rest in peace. The Leader for the Nation of Cuba for a long time. I like the perching dove on his shoulder story)
 [A few days after President Obama’s highly publicized visit to Cuba in 2016 — the first by a sitting American president in 88 years — Mr. Castro penned a cranky response denigrating Mr. Obama’s overtures of peace and insisting that Cuba did not need anything the United States was offering.]

The Office of the President was reserved for America's homegrown allegiance & posterity. Dual , Divided or Fractured allegiance was understood to be needing adopting status and Congress took them up. For example, Title Eight ss 1401 a-h is entitled [ Nationals and Citizens at Birth].

Notice it does not say [ natural born Citizens]. It mimics the 14th Amendment language of [ Born and naturalized in the U.S. ].

The Constitution cannot endure an immoral people. Delusional people deny Facts. People who lie distort the Truth. These are forms of Dishonesty and act as a destructive force upon the Nation.

I'm not sure where we can find a bigger lie upon the Nation than a sacrifice in National Security or that which prohibited any other allegiance in the Office of President other than American.

Now why is this a most vulnerable position? The Office of President is the Head of the Executive Branch co-equal in Powers of the Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch.  Those two Branches are divided up in concentrations of many Body Congress Offices and Panels of Judges, and People moving slow in majorities and actions.

The Office of President was needed for swift decisive circumstances demanding a head not a body taking votes. It was however hamstrung by two term as limits but remained a co-equal Branch.  It was further hamstrung or reigned in from abuse by the Qualification of [ natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents- Total and complete American Allegiance that takes two generations.

You would also have to be delusional to think that life in the U.S. was exactly like life in Iran, or North Korea, or China, or Russia, or Sweden. The biggest concern in two generations of time for the Office of President was acclimation of our Laws, Customs, and norms which are different than any other Nation. Denial of these facts is Delusional. They are Recorded in The House Judiciary Committee 2000.

The disturbing reality is I believe Congress and the Court's are very capable of absorbing all these Facts, just like elementary school children. That makes their delusion of the Facts a complete violation of Law & Order.

Art.II, Sect.1, C--5 specifically mentions that being a [ natural born Citizen] was not the Qualification for President if you were a [Citizen] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution .

It made sense to grandfather in Citizens of a new Nation at the Time it was being forged with its own Sovereignty Land mass called States that formed a new Jurisdiction of Law & Order dedicating powers and authority best to preserve itself.

I feel it a tragedy that these Majority Republicans in the House and Senate now since 2010 and 2012 respectively have failed to bring their impressions to enlighten the Public for the Trust of the Nation, but they have all either hidden or remain delusional to the Fact that Obama is not a [ natural born Citizen ] with his Kenyan father who was never a U.S. Citizen with the power of a Vote.

It's not a shame to American Ideals to say our Law Demands someone born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as President. It's a Recognition! A Reward! A Positive Incentive regardless of color, race, prior condition of servitude, or sex!

Sure, you may need 60 Senators for a denial of a filibuster , but not for a Hearing in a Committee where you can persuade with Facts even your childish colleagues and advertise to the Nation on C-Span such Facts as Reality differentiating the Delusions. Come on, I'm a Democrat, have been for years.

I don't subscribe to delusion of Facts relating to our Constitution. I sued McCain and Obama. Republican Cowards in the corner, I say, "Come out!" Stand as Americans with some courage as I have for True Principle. If you're embarrassed by our Nation because of being called Racist you sure don't have the courage to lead a Nation in the positions you are in.

You have frankly compromised our Nation's top Office.  There is no other word for it. Why? Was it to gain 1,000 seats across the Land Obama has lost for Democrats while you sanctioned the 10 Trillion in the Treasury and sold generations after you their Freedom and Liberty?

Was it because Sen McCain was a good-ole-boy  and cronyism is less feared than racism? Who ever had two Congressional Acts on their citizenship and wasn't called the prankster of the [ natural born Citizen] ship?

 Was it because you hoped Obama would pave the way for a much deeper bench of Republican Senators Representatives, and Governors who also like Obama are not [ Born in the U.S  to Citizen Parents- making them not true [natural born Citizens]?

Well, compromise is good but not if you die first. You gotta stand up and draw a line and defend Americans or you are sacrificing Americans, and those whose hopes and dreams rest in that defense. Sure, Republicans and Democrats have their differences, but in the end we are Americans-some new-some old- not all are Qualified for President, not all for the House or Senate, but we are under the U.S. Constitution and it is the Republic for which we stand.

You know I've fought Democrats as a Democrat. I've fought Republicans too. I don't give a damn about standing for corruption over the red, white, and blue. Our Constitution demands a natural born Citizen in the Office of President, and Obama's failed that test. He's an embarrassment in the Office for our elementary children watching and reading we want them to be the best.

They know you know and your example is thus far sick and delusional. Look at Minor v. Happersett which is SCOTUS precedent and states, " No doubt for those born in the Country to its Citizens were natives or natural born Citizens to the others there have been doubts" , and ask yourself is an Entire Co-Equal Branch of the Government worth giving up the high ground, or is the Office of President an office you are comfortable leaving with doubts?

No doubt your Republican Establishment lost the Presidency to someone who never held office before. President Elect Trump was hammered as the Leader of the Birther Movement and inspired more to come out and vote because they saw an opening to smash the Establishment of Corruption.  Your pink slip may come quickly.

You Republicans who are left and continue to fail National Security are not out-of-the-woods yet. In fact, failing to act might be just what Democrats need as you get blamed for the National Security breech in the Office of President.

You may have heard of the out-Landish Australian Refugees Australia won't even take from Theocracies in the Middle East predominate to Islam. The Refugees are Muslims but Obama has a stealth plan to bring them. 

The breach of NATIONAL SECURITY is in the hands of these men who have so far refused the Facts of Evidence received by them in the COLD CASE POSSEE of Sheriff Joe Arpiao of a fabricated long form birth certificate, and Selective Service Record.

There will be one more National Presser from Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Possee December 15th, 2016.

CRJ

Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America to have a bi- Partisan Federal Court Record taking a stand for the [ natural born Citizen] Qualification for U.S. President in three runs for President 2008, 2012, and 2016.

 See: Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, NV.
U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 &14-9396.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

BLOG www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
WEB: www.codyjudy.us

BREAKING REPORT: LOVE AMERICAN STYLE - Inside the Establishment's TOP SECRET Denial hating Americans

BREAKING REPORT:
FEATURED EDITORIAL THE POST AND EMAIL

~LOVE AMERICAN STYLE ~

Inside the Establishment's TOP SECRET Denial hating Americans

Love American Style was a hit television series that aired from between 1969 to 1974 on ABC starring many legends including Ron Howard and Marion Ross I watched as a kid.

The song introducing the program was one of those if you got in your head you were done for. While the song was also something you never minded because it was "Love American Style", it just might be the key to the reason in a nutshell that former Florida Governor Jeb Bush decided, after one of the most well financed campaigns in modern American History 150 Million Dollars worth, to suspend the Campaign. Jeb said in April 6,2014 :

Jeb Bush's Statement of Illegal Actions being Acts of Love

"But the way I look at this -- and I'm going to say this, and it'll be on tape and so be it. The way I look at this is someone who comes to our country because they couldn’t come legally, they come to our country because their families -- the dad who loved their children -- was worried that their children didn’t have food on the table. And they wanted to make sure their family was intact, and they crossed the border because they had no other means to work to be able to provide for their family. Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love. It’s an act of commitment to your family. I honestly think that that is a different kind of crime that there should be a price paid, but it shouldn’t rile people up that people are actually coming to this country to provide for their families."

Politico ran a story Feb 20,2016 two days ago entitled "Inside Jeb Bush's $150 Million Failure" by Eli Stokels basically blaming all of Jeb Bush's woes on his own Political Counselors failure to predict Mr. Donald Trump with commentary of the epic misread of the GOP Base's hostility towards any Establishment Candidate 'tragicomically mismatched to the electorate'.

"Trump baited Bush into a fight, staking out a position to the far right of the Floridian by calling for an end to automatic citizenship to any baby born in America. He ridiculed Bush’s earlier comment that immigrants who come to the United States illegally do it as an “act of love” for family, and called him unelectable."

Of course Trump was talking about what would become Jeb Bush's nemesis- U.S. Senator Marco Rubio and Bush's remark out of the conundrum of “anchor babies” in that he would be a tough enforcer of immigration law, but failed to pull the trigger on Marco Rubio as ineligible for the Office of the President because Rubio in fact was one who achieved his [U.S. Citizenship] by birth on U.S. Soil from statute, declaration, or constitutional Amendment, with foreign parents. The only claim of U.S. Citizenship was the line of the Border of the United States, but of course this didn't make Rubio a [[natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], distinct from congressional statute or adoption of [Citizen] as the requirement states or is allowable for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives.

Indeed the so-called 'Positive Spots" Jeb's Campaign was trying to maintain in high-ground were not working nearly forcing the JEB! Campaign to go negative infuriating the bur under his blanket Rubio.  The biggest problem with JEB'!'s negative attacks against Rubio, estimates of 36 Million Dollars worth,  is they did not encompass the moral high-ground of 'Love American Style' or the U.S. Constitution's qualification for the Office of the President.

ART II, SECTION 1, CLAUSE 5
[No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.]

The 14th Amendment was never a referendum meant to make the qualifications of the Office of the President found in Article II, Section 1, C-5 moot, and so the false narrative is exposed of those born in the U.S. automatically being [natural born Citizens]. Indeed neither was U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's claims derived from the Naturalization Act Nationals and Citizens at Birth Title 8 § 1401 a-h  upon his mother's U.S. Citizenship, but it gives everyone a very clear picture that [U.S. Citizenship] can be achieved by both birth or soil heritage and also what is termed 'conferred' citizenship or Parentally inherited.

One of the biggest problems with [conferred citizenship] is that, yes a baby at the time of birth can receive a U.S. Citizenship from a mother or father, but it has to also be considered the baby receives the foreign parent's citizenship in mutual respect making up the [dual citizenship also termed dual national] or with a fractured allegiance prohibited from the pure American [natural born Citizen]ship required for the office of the President seen in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

 The Office of President was the only Office reserved as LOVE- American Style; as such offering a positive incentive to acquire the status of All American.

JEB! CAMP was warned or notified repeatedly but refused to recognize it as a national security concern. In two emails to Jeb Bush's Campaign from the CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW, the conflict was out-lined and the road to take but Jeb refused to [Go BIRTHER!] or in other words, take a stand for the U.S. Constitution or umbrella of supreme law Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz both violate with their failed [time credentials] to the Office of the President according to the American Standard or U.S. Constitution. Both emails were unheeded, and as we see disaster followed the JEB! CAMP rather than the hero status an actual stand for the Constitution could have earned him.

" The real weird part of this whole thing, is Jeb's love for foreign allegiance both Cruz and Rubio exhibit in their dual citizenship qualifications was greater than what he showed Americans of no foreign allegiance. Its really incredible to think about", Cody said, "but it really is something the Establishment's of both the Republicans and Democrats have not got through their heads yet as to the anger of the anti-establishments in both major parties.

"Americans want some reserved privilege as well incentive in total Americanism, and the Politicians wanting to be inclusive to all the Citizenry end up sacrificing true blue Americanism for foreign allegiances which ends in a sense of hatred towards Americans in the first instance- its not LOVE AMERICAN STYLE and the bases of the major Parties are punishing Politicians brutally for it. It hasn't hit Hillary Clinton yet, but I think it will."

Trump, who has never filed a single legal paper, or contributed a dime of legal help towards any Presidential Candidate with standing against any unqualified Candidate has played the fence. He has used the media to draw the attention to the matter, but has not trusted the Judicial Branch to uphold what we all learned in school: [natural born citizen is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].

 He has played it well as far as splitting hairs and appearing as an altar boy to the GOP Base who are angriest at the lack of political courage that has both allowed and financed Barack Obama for 7 years. Trump has pummeled Ted Cruz over his foreign birth and foreign parents, ( Cruz's mother is thought to have made an oath to Canada in order to vote in elections and work at the time of Ted's birth making her a dual citizen of Canada)  Ted Cruz's mother Eleanor holding citizenship in the U.S. at the time of Ted’s birth, she could have registered Ted as a dual citizen at birth, Canada by Native birth right and citizen of the U.S. through his mother’s citizenship in the U.S. however she did not register Ted as a dual citizen at birth, but rather as a Native Born Citizen of Canada alone as the lawsuits sprouting up contend.

The Parliament of Canada thus enacted the Canadian Citizenship Act 1946, which came into effect on 1 January of the following year. New immigrants were then required to recite the Oath of Allegiance for Purposes of Citizenship, which was an adaptation of the original Oath of Allegiance: "I swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King George the Sixth, His Heirs and Successors, according to law, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen- [grant of citizenship to a foreign woman married to a Canadian man after one year's residence as a landed immigrant]

Gov. Jeb Bush definitely had standing to bring the legal question to the Court questioning both Cruz and Rubio's official [qualification time] necessary to occupy the Office of the President should either be elected and to claim Campaign Damages from their pulling delegates away from his campaign, but he lacked the constitutional courage and political chutzpah although he did not have a problem attacking their political records.

If you just think about that for a minute you start to getting the idea forming in your head that millions of Americans also have. Why is it necessary to attack someone's political voting record if they are not qualified for the Office in the first place? Disqualify them for not being qualified and you are supporting the Constitution. Supporting the Constitution isn't 'bad for America' and is positive, but negative politics can easily be called 'going negative'.

It is difficult to address legally because there are no laws prohibiting someone who is not qualified from running. In other words, the Government feels the Candidates oath unenforceable. I disagree with that presumption, said '08. '12' and 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy because if the Candidate has certified himself or herself as qualified should they be elected to the office they are running for, they are binding themselves to the rules of the race with an oath. Stating there are rules that are unenforceable is an absurdity or just plain stupid.

 A false statement made to a judicial officer is a criminal liability under criminal rules of False Statements especially if the Candidate actually holds a Government Office at the time it is made such as Rubio, Cruz, McCain or Obama who were all U.S. Senators at the time they began their Presidential Campaigns.

The problem is you need an attorney general willing to prosecute that crime and these guys have tons of political connections and are willing to use them for their own political ambitions. Don't get me started on Governor Christie a former U.S. A.G. prosecutor.

 Jeb Bush as a former Governor was perfectly positioned to actually do just that with his own collateral standing outside the U.S. Senate, but we are to assume he did not want to win actually employing or using the U.S. Constitution for a stand.

Unfortunately, this leaves all the people who do not have 'standing' to sue out in the cold as far as remedy; and the presumption of enforcement willy-nilly or wide open to any one really wanting to run for Office who is or will become a citizen by means of soil or parentally conferred status, lashing out at the [natural born Citizen] requirement in the U.S. Constitution as a polluted term rather than a pure one.

Many people say, and it has been written in opinion, that the Constitution had a problem because it did not expressly say what a [natural born Citizen] was. Indeed, the reason based on the Founders and Framers of the U.S. Constitution who cleared the way giving Congress the powers of naturalization. They themselves were also naturalized U.S. Citizens by the terms of the Declaration of Independence.

They realized the powers of naturalization could not have any power over natural law, or the laws of nature. It was a false narrative or paradox to say that a [natural born Citizen  ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] could be [naturalized or adopted as aliens, foreigners or nationals could], thus any statement presuming such was easily proven a fraud.

Thus, the fact [natural born Citizen] definition was not articulated was indeed a positive format and not a misnomer of statute. This was the reason the 1790 Naturalization Act language of [natural born Citizen] was deleted for the 1795 Naturalization Act replacing it with [Citizen]. The acts of naturalization could not have any hold upon a natural born Citizen and these were indeed naturalization actions of congress as their titles expressed.

This is why it was stated in the qualifications for the Office of the President that 'Citizens' at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution were considered eligible. There were no 'natural born Citizens' even though many had been born in the providence of the early colony States, none were born under the jurisdiction of law the U.S. Constitution created so they were adopted in or there was a process of law articulating their qualifications.

Any articulation of citizenship having any force of including a member outside a society to one inside uttered by law is a statute, or declaration of law. In other words it is a compliment to [natural born Citizen] not to be articulated in law not a pejorative.

A [natural born Citizen] as written in the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett are those of the Country born to Citizens of the country and are never doubted to be [natural born Citizens]

Jeb Bush just didn't have the political courage to take a stand for that. It might also be because of the endless whip lashings of the media towards Birthers rather than Article II Patriots taking a stand for America's national security concerns. Politicians live and die on stories written by the Media framed in the slants of negative and positive formats towards the individual.

If the Media felt that discrimination was involved instead of qualification, indeed they let you have it as Donald Trump was made the subject of in 2011 flat out called racist by the Main Stream Media in several stories: here here here  The media has never apologized nor has Mr. Trump been called a racist like he was with Obama with his articulations that Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen qualified to run in 2016.

As a personal statement Cody Robert Judy, the only candidate for President in America with a record to really present to the Federal Courts in a bi-partisan stand against both McCain and Obama in 2008 2012, and now 2016, said, " I've always simply stood for the law not letting popularity of a person stand in the way of the principle of the law. I think that's simply what Americans wanted. Its love towards them no politician is articulating. It just made more sense to me to let the chips fall where they did understanding that popular candidates fade with time, but the law remains unchanged. I've always invested in time rather than cash because principle holds power through times and seasons regardless of the storms of such that come and go. I'd rather have been known as a man of Principle forever, then as an popular impulse for 7 years that fades as a lame duck. I may not have slept or eaten in the White House, but my sleep has been sweet and I have dreamed in green pastures that are sweet to me."

"In the BIG BOWL of anti-establishments I really believe a new allegiance is being formed and made and those with indifference towards the U.S. Constitution will find their rights undefended when they feel they are needed most as payback or ultimately the harvest comes, and they reap what they have sown. We are all adults here; everyone clamors for the door of the ark that's shut tight, after the rain starts and they realize they are outside and not on the inside anymore. We're witnessing right now the tables being turned over. Former Gov. Bush's 150 Million could not buy anything of value. It was a total waste. I have the utmost confidence those with money will get the message very soon."

Cody Robert Judy's Motion to Reopen and Reconsider his forma pauperis Motion with new evidence remains undocketed by the U.S. Supreme Court  while it was resubmitted as per the last Post that articulated the criminal complaint to the Attorney General's Office against the SCOTUS Court Clerks for False Statements as follows. There have been no News stories covering this although over 300 Major News Outlets have been notified of it:

MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER 

  CRJ Report MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER MOTION of Forma Pauperis

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us

CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy

D-Candidate for President 2016

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court

Direct http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

EVOLUTION REVOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT LOSERS, AMERICAN WINNERS, and the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

Breaking Report

~EVOLUTION REVOLUTION ~

 ESTABLISHMENT LOSERS, AMERICAN WINNERS and the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

As the United States of America began a new Union was formed in what came to be know as the American Revolution. Over two centuries later the United States continues in an Evolution Revolution. The founders and framers anticipated this progress making the United States Constitution flexible in the ability to adapt and adopt changes. One thing that has not changed are the qualifications for President however, America is right now in a wrestling match between The People and elected politicians. The 2016 Presidential Election is the playing field.

Concerns and fears that were established over the course of centuries were put under the microscope in the drafting of the United States Constitution. Considering the frailty of a new nation, the remarkable success story the United States of America in the world has been a riveting story.

Central to the United States Constitution was its Offices and qualifications for those new leadership positions that would safeguard the freedom and liberty found in the principles outlined in the Unions new agreement. The central leading Executive Officer was to be called a President and he was to be a [natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen], a distinguished revolutionary patriot at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution as time was needed for the seeds of the new nation to take root and produce a new generations of Americans.

The history of its mother nation from which an independence was sought also had a rich history in an abhorrence to foreign influence and protections from foreigners entering offices and the new nations founders were well informed of that history which also became a guide.

New Commercial

CRJ4PRES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN


In 2008 a new term was born in American Politics. The Birthers were seen as a pejorative in the mainstream media. They were the resolute Americans from both major parties who were struggling to represent the Congressional Mandate [natural born Citizen] requirement for the Office of President as born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The term and definition has been assaulted in a cantankerous and abusive domestic relationship that penned even elected politicians against their contingency. Since 2000 the Judicial Committee of the House took it up in serious hearings, and since 2003 an unhinged eight attempts in therapy sessions of the Legislative Branch but every time the [natural born citizen] and its definition came out intact.

 The Birthers were called ridiculous, old fashioned, absurd, delusional, even ludicrous for taking a stand for this simple term and understanding that had the vested interest of the nations national security at its heart.

Many chided, "There were no more foreign princes to be worried about taking over the American military", expressing in their contempt a old fashioned rhetoric of the Revolutionary War period fashioning the concerns and fears noticed to have promoted the [natural born Citizen] requirement in the first place in a letter from preemptive first Supreme Court Justice John Jay to the Nations preemptive first President George Washington:

"Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen."

The admission of foreigners, not foreign influence the anti-birthers blasted, forgetting the solomn charge of President George Washington's 1796 farewell address:
Excerpt 1
[ Hence, likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments which, under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty. In this sense it is that your union ought to be considered as a main prop of your liberty, and that the love of the one ought to endear to you the preservation of the other.]

Excerpt 2
[With such powerful and obvious motives to union, affecting all parts of our country, while experience shall not have demonstrated its impracticability, there will always be reason to distrust the patriotism of those who in any quarter may endeavor to weaken its bands.]

Excerpt 3

[I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.]

Excerpt 4

[The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.]

Excerpt 5

[Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.]

 It is this 'foreign influence' that is the consideration also depicted in the [natural born Citizen] definition of [born in the United States to Citizen Parents].

If we are to champion our Liberty and Freedom, we must understand that a simple child's birth does not anchor a parent's citizenship. Indeed we have seen parents abandon their country's left and right for the promise of another.  We cannot by hypocritical in our thinking and suppose that a child's birth establishes a natural born Citizen status.

Linked to both the soil and each of his parents we do find a most [natural born Citizen] as President Washington advocated neutral in the partiality of his love for any foreign nation or excessive dislike of the same.

The excessive love understood in the core of a child's nurturing circumstances will undoubtedly shape his love and hate tolerances out of the love for his parent. This fractured loyalty may become a hindrance to the requirements of a President in the duty to protect Americans.

If he loves a foreign nation in an undue respect, he might hesitate to denounce an atrocity as such. If he hates a foreign nation because of what it did to his parents, that also might be a weakness if he is called to defend it for reasons as an allied nation of America in the shifting political world governments. We see then a natural born Citizen of America as having no dual citizenship present in his parental heritage or of the soil and this is a requirement that keeps the 'self' free from an internal conflict.

How many times have we heard U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, or U.S. Senator Barack Obama refer to their foreign parental upbringing as a major character influence in their person? They are not expressing good characteristics for a President to have,  but in contrast are expressing those characteristics that are in conflict with the duties of the office.

It is not only the influence of an individual as President acting upon a foreign State we are concerned about. It is also the influence of a person for a foreign state that may be compromised surrendering, as President George Washington said, the interest of the people.

 This may be considered in fact in delivering, giving up, surrendering, or selling military arms to a foreign influence that then could be used against Americans and could be just as devastating as leading a whole army against America in a formal invasion.

If we are to understand this in a practical manner, we must consider Obama's actions and words in the last 7 years also understanding his personal conflicts of which even a movies has
been made about detailing an un-natural hostility Obama has with American colonialism.

Just a few headlines
1-

Rebel Arms Flow Is Said to Benefit Jihadists in Syria

2

Obama delays arms shipments to Israel while confirming advanced arms sales to Turkey and Qatar

3

Obama Sells $11 Billion Worth of Arms to Hamas’s Sponsor, Qatar

4

America will pay the price for Obama’s Iran deal ‘victory’

 The biggest problem with a broken loyalty is the person who betrays is rarely around when the loyalty comes crashing down. The theories of the terrorist attack of San Bernardino are unconfirmed, however America is left to understand as best as we can that their was a motive  activate the terrorist attack. Not only why did they do it, but why did they choose to do it when they did?

Many suspect that the compromise in the natural born Citizen clause in the government was for the gains of America electing its first black president or even its first President with Islamic or Muslim background. While ignoring the fact that Obama is indeed half white and acknowledging Obama is Christian but was raised Muslim in the impressionable ages of his youth in Indonesia, the natural stream of ideology flowing from both is father as a Muslim and his step father as a Muslim, is it so far fetched to understand that these influences are in fact flowing out of the Obama Administration?

Is it so hard to understand that the Birthers with the concerns that Obama be vetted as a natural born Citizen, and the glaring exclamation of his not being [born in the U.S. to Citizen parents] are not racist or bigoted but are simply Patriots to America, the U.S. Constitution, and have understood all along the compromise that will come back to haunt us in a devastation?

Of great concern also is the alarming fact that the national debt under Obama has raised from 100,000 per person to 169,000 per person? Obama has not lacked for money! He is the most well financed acting person in the Office of the President to every have had the grace of 10 Trillion Dollars, more than any other person in our History. How is it then that 94 million Americans are out of the work force, but we are celebrating a 5% unemployment rate? Isn't that a little bit of a farce?

This economic disaster is yet to be recognized, but Congress just passed another half a trillion dollar budget deal financing Obama through the end of his term. America can only look and gasp as the leaders of the both the establishments seem to have done everything for Obama while gasping at the chasm they see between them and the people in the insurgence of Mr. Donald Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders two outside of the beltway establishments being supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

As a 2016 Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party I can only hope that America will consider the necessity of balance required in the Office of the President in the natural born Citizen requirement as both Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio are still major players in the Republican race who are ineligible.

We just can't afford to pick our Presidents while blocking the wisdom our founders and framers expressed and not find the ruin that they predicted we would find if we abandoned these principles.


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Dec.15 2015 #DemDebate Cody Robert Judy Short Importance of Natural Born Citizen on National Security

BREAKING REPORT:

Dec.15 2015 #DemDebate Cody Robert Judy Short

 Importance of Natural Born Citizen on National Security

On December 15th, 2015 Democratic Party  2016 Presidential Candidate held a Meet N Greet the Candidate at the Main Library in Ogden, Utah from 6:30-8pm. This short 15 minute video highlighted some of the very important reasons that the Constitution's qualification of [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President really does affect American's Opportunity.

CRJ identifies some of the very relevant points and disagreements highlighted in the aspects of the natural born Citizen and Congress's ability to create a naturalize process by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4

Dec.15th,2015 #DemDebate Cody Robert Judy 4 U.S. President 2016 

Cody explains very clearly how the claim of anti-Birthers is false in that in the Nationals and Citizens at birth Title 8 Subsection 8 a-h is a 'naturalization act' of Congress , just as the 14th Amendment or any other Naturalization Act.

He explains that there are really only two types of Citizens- Natural Born Citizens and Naturalized Citizens and the glaring fact that "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" is not included in Title 8, Section 1401 a-h is a Congressional Declaration that the Act is not an articulation of [natural born Citizen] but rather only what it selects and purports to be in the title for Nationals and Citizens at birth not unlike the qualifications for Representatives and Senators in the U.S. Constitutions qualifications for those offices.

 Anti-birthers point to  as articulating [natural born Citizen] but the term is not mentioned in the Act nor is the definition [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as it is in Minor v. Happersett where the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court declared it was never doubted those born in the Country to its Citizens were themselves the natural born Citizens.

A Discussion is ongoing entitled BIRTHER LITIGANT SEES THE LIGHT where you can see many other comments like the one below made by CRJ.

 http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/.../birther-litigant-sees.../
Another of my comments in the discussion

Not at all. I’m simply pointing out that the same [naturalization process] which is Law by Congress affecting Senators Cruz , Rubio, and Obama effectively include Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jennifer Granholm in their naturalization process effectively also articulated by Congress.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

US Code
Notes
Authorities (CFR)
prev | next
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe:
Provided
, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:
Provided
, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States

Those becoming naturalized by 14th Amendment

Citizenship Through Naturalization
Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

http://www.uscis.gov/.../citizenship-through-naturalization

You May Qualify for Naturalization if:

You have been a permanent resident for at least 5 years and meet all other eligibility requirements, please visit our Path to Citizenship page for more information.
You have been a permanent resident for 3 years or more and meet all eligibility requirements to file as a spouse of a U.S. citizen, please visit our Naturalization for Spouses of U.S. Citizens page for more information.
You have qualifying service in the U.S. armed forces and meet all other eligibility requirements. Visit the Military section of our website.
Your child may qualify for naturalization if you are a U.S. citizen, the child was born outside the U.S., the child is currently residing outside the U.S., and all other eligibility requirements are met.

Clarifying that a-h are [natural born Citizens] while they are certified as such by an Act of Congress known as 8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth seems … Ridiculously Arbitrary

If there are two types
1- Citizens who are naturalized
( should include all in Title 8 as Nationals and Aliens)

2- Citizens who are natural born Citizens
(Born in the U.S to Citizen Parents -free from any naturalization act)

To me it truly is a wonderful, beautiful KEY  representing the most lovely song I’ve ever heard  that has in its melody the words, ” I Love You “. . it has been the secret of God’s Love for America.

This is why. . to forget it is indeed like ripping the heart  out of my chest and pulling all of my tears out of my eyes.

It is the cruelest atrocity conceivable to leave as an inheritance to our children. . slavery … Subjects rather than Citizens … A Kingdom rather than a Partnershipped Country. It is the climate change of an entire Country as a Republic.

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.