Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Importance of Natural Born Citizen on National Security
On December 15th, 2015 Democratic Party 2016 Presidential Candidate held a Meet N Greet the Candidate at the Main Library in Ogden, Utah from 6:30-8pm. This short 15 minute video highlighted some of the very important reasons that the Constitution's qualification of [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President really does affect American's Opportunity.
CRJ identifies some of the very relevant points and disagreements highlighted in the aspects of the natural born Citizen and Congress's ability to create a naturalize process by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4
Cody explains very clearly how the claim of anti-Birthers is false in that in the Nationals and Citizens at birth Title 8 Subsection 8 a-h is a 'naturalization act' of Congress , just as the 14th Amendment or any other Naturalization Act.
He explains that there are really only two types of Citizens- Natural Born Citizens and Naturalized Citizens and the glaring fact that "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" is not included in Title 8, Section 1401 a-h is a Congressional Declaration that the Act is not an articulation of [natural born Citizen] but rather only what it selects and purports to be in the title for Nationals and Citizens at birth not unlike the qualifications for Representatives and Senators in the U.S. Constitutions qualifications for those offices.
Anti-birthers point to as articulating [natural born Citizen] but the term is not mentioned in the Act nor is the definition [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as it is in Minor v. Happersett where the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court declared it was never doubted those born in the Country to its Citizens were themselves the natural born Citizens.
A Discussion is ongoing entitled BIRTHER LITIGANT SEES THE LIGHT where you can see many other comments like the one below made by CRJ.
Not at all. I’m simply pointing out that the same [naturalization process] which is Law by Congress affecting Senators Cruz , Rubio, and Obama effectively include Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jennifer Granholm in their naturalization process effectively also articulated by Congress.
8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code Notes Authorities (CFR) prev | next The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided , That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property; (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person; (d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States; (e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person; (f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States; (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided , That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and (h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States
Those becoming naturalized by 14th Amendment
Citizenship Through Naturalization Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
You have been a permanent resident for at least 5 years and meet all other eligibility requirements, please visit our Path to Citizenship page for more information. You have been a permanent resident for 3 years or more and meet all eligibility requirements to file as a spouse of a U.S. citizen, please visit our Naturalization for Spouses of U.S. Citizens page for more information. You have qualifying service in the U.S. armed forces and meet all other eligibility requirements. Visit the Military section of our website. Your child may qualify for naturalization if you are a U.S. citizen, the child was born outside the U.S., the child is currently residing outside the U.S., and all other eligibility requirements are met.
Clarifying that a-h are [natural born Citizens] while they are certified as such by an Act of Congress known as 8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth seems … Ridiculously Arbitrary
If there are two types 1- Citizens who are naturalized ( should include all in Title 8 as Nationals and Aliens)
2- Citizens who are natural born Citizens (Born in the U.S to Citizen Parents -free from any naturalization act) To me it truly is a wonderful, beautiful KEY representing the most lovely song I’ve ever heard that has in its melody the words, ” I Love You “. . it has been the secret of God’s Love for America.
This is why. . to forget it is indeed like ripping the heart out of my chest and pulling all of my tears out of my eyes.
It is the cruelest atrocity conceivable to leave as an inheritance to our children. . slavery … Subjects rather than Citizens … A Kingdom rather than a Partnershipped Country. It is the climate change of an entire Country as a Republic.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Part II. UNDERSTANDING THE CHANGE- HILLARY CLINTON'S COMPROMISED
The Trust Issue through Qatar
In a July 12th, 2015 feature by S.V. DA'TE, spotlighted on The Drudge Report, entitled 'Hillary Clinton's White Male Voter Problem, gender and race are articulated as challenges to overcome rather than integrity and trust. That's what happens when Polls take over your Political Campaign Course of action. While 'Males' are singled out in the article's title featured in National Journal, the underlying problem identified by 'Males' simply hasn't been translated by 'Females' yet. The "Trust and Integrity" problem is a much bigger problem than the 'White Male' problem.
Clinton has made this pie herself. In decisions reported by FOX byJudge Andrew P. Napolitano detailing how Hillary Clinton lied to Congress, gave arms to terrorists and destroyed her emails, and followed Obama as Secretary of State, that included a payload of weapons delivered through Qatar that then was delivered to Al-Qaeda, I.S.I.S, used in"Libya's district of Benghazi" and "Syria", using her own "Server" that also lead to a cache of foreign contributions to the Clinton Foundation being deleted as Yoga Emails, has destroyed her credibility as badly as 'Iran-Contra' hurt Ronald Reagan.
Napolitano described the legal trouble plaguing, as a defamation of 'Trust & Integrity' that has knocked the wind out of America for Hillary Clinton, to be like a punch in the gut while your not looking. "She's in a lot of legal trouble", he said. While calling herself 'transparent' she willfully deleted and happily skirted the rules. Is it any wonder she just recently sold 2,000 tickets to a rally where 10,000 where available?
[FOX News chief legal correspondent Judge Andrew Napolitano told FBN host Charles Payne a "conspiracy existed" among President Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Treasury Department and various Congressional leaders to have arms sent to rebels in Syria and Libya. Napolitano came to the conclusion after going through several hundred pages of documents with FOX News' intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge.]
Blaming the 'White Male' is more consistent with the Clinton Camp than 'losing the mail', or the excuse that the 'dog ate the mail'. They are tough and can take it. On the flip side the liberal media caused quite an uproar printing half sentences of Donald Trump's opening Campaign Speech regarding Mexico and illegal immigrants stationed in what has really just hit America's psyche, 'sanctuary cities', and an excellent cover-up of 'illegal immigrant crimes' only now coming into the political fray.
Protecting 'illegal immigrant' crimes, while American children are raped and murdered, doesn't really seem to be a working campaign strategy for Americans regardless of 'race, color, gender, or previous conditions of servitude as is spelled out in the United States Constitution's 15 Amendment and 19th Amendments'.
One interesting fact that was spelled out in the article was that for every 1 percentage point of loss in the minority male Caucasian vote, the ratio would have to be made up by increases of 4 to 5 percentage points in the other minorities groups.
As a Democratic Party Candidate for President hoping to reach that threshold of contributions that the F.E.C. requires for Candidates to Report officially, I have no problem asserting the painfully excoriating nausea that has gripped America with the Democratic Party loss of 'protection for Americans' that illegal immigration poses. While Donald Trump is on the other side of the isle from me, I have no problem whatsoever promoting the crisis of protection being denied by those on the same side of the isle as I am. Understanding empathetically the loss of children because of the laws that have failed protections of all Americans regardless of race, color, gender or previous conditions of servitude I have felt that pain.
Viewed over 45,000 times already are the victim impact statements we should all take a really close look at.
How Americans, regardless of race, color, gender, or previous conditions of servitude, could listen to these impact Statements and not understand that the United States has a very big problem with remaining the United States is beyond my own understanding.
Under-reported has been my consistent stand on Border Security and Legal Immigration, spotlighted over the last two election cycles as a Democratic Party Candidate for President as well as a Write-In Candidate in the General Elections, of '08, and '12, that Mr. Trump is gaining traction over now. As Americans when we see a problem and a solution, it shouldn't matter what party is 'featured', 'brings it up', or has had it 'on record', what matters is that the problem is dealt with.
It probably would be a political point for me to say that Mr. Trump has taken a look at my Three Point Platform and using the Trump Name Recognition with those three points, and is in his first race for political office leading with the republican Polls with them now with his fellow Republican Presidential Candidates as well as Democratic Party Candidates taking a close look at what's happening.
While many have pointed to my losses as failures, I've often remarked in the 1 Congressional Race, 2 Senatorial Races, and now 3 Presidential Platforms I've been involved with , if I can pass the baton of a good idea on, my Campaigns have not been failures at all. I am thrilled Mr. Trump is placing light on a subject that needs to be spotlighted!
As for the media nay-sayers that see Mr. Trump as a threat to Mrs. Clinton's campaign, I say why has she and Obama been threatening American's by serving those who are not American Voters in the first place?
While the portion of Mexican/Latino/Spanish/Cuban Americans who are here legally, did their part to come through the front door, instead of crawling over your back yard fence, or going through the broken window, why in the world would they place their American 'Vote' for someone 'breaking' the Law? I don't think they would; and those who would, are not respecting their own American Citizenship now.
Flooding a system illegally over the wall, is no more right than a gang flooding a department store and looting it. That seems to be what the liberal left has been busy at reporting and hoping for. Its the bully tactic that I have highlighted over and over again that is wrong and against our individually protected rights. Obama has failed miserably at this, and while statistics of particular cities on the borders may be drawn upon for 'useful' purposes to further the agenda, the 1/16 of an inch on the border map that city represents is betrayed by the thousands of miles that demonstrate the real picture of failed policies breaking the backs of Americans.
["Obama says the border has never been more secure and is urging a series of legislative steps to legalize millions of undocumented immigrants, streamline the visa system and further fortify the border. He has already moved to protect certain undocumented immigrants from deportation through executive actions. But these actions have faced resistance in the courts.."]
Statistics has been something Obama has specialized in manipulating, just like the unemployment rate that doesn't include missing workers. Official unemployment rates are at 5.3% but when you add the missing employers from the work force you add 7.3% . The unemployment rate Obama clings to is vastly understating the actual employment problem America is facing in Today's Labor Force.
This unemployment and M.I.A Labor Force is a direct result of what is indeed a deportation of American Jobs by the incentive for Companies to go to cheaper labor markets outside the states where the product comes back in the U.S. un-taxed for the American Consumer to cobble up. Its the use of foreign slavery that dictatorial governments do not mind engaging for the distribution of wealth and transformation of America Obama is engaged in as a usurper.
Yes, Obama has never been qualified by America's Constitution according to the release of his own Campaigns' identifications of him in birth certification, or long form birth certificate. Both those documents identify Obama's father as Kenyan which means Obama fails the two prong test of the Constitution's demands that the President and Vice President be 'natural born Citizen(s)' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
While Mr. Trump is gaining ground, and has explicitly taken credit for getting Obama to release his long form birth certificate, he has not been responsible for funding any action that might Constitutionally remove Obama from the usurped office of the President, although he has been asked repeatedly for help.
At nearly the same point in the Race as Mr. Trump is right now, I was engaging as a Democratic Candidate for President in 2012 against Obama in Iowa Caucus's , New Hampshire, and Georgia spotlighting Obama as an 'unqualified Candidate' and objecting to his siphoning of funds off in my Party. That same action by Mr. Trump would require he stand up against Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal with like addressed Ballot Challenges and certainly Public Press Conferences right now deploring contributions to them, which we are not seeing.
This failure has always been attributed to those in the Birther Movement. They pick on Obama but fail within their own Party's Nomination to excoriate illegal Candidates for the Office of the President. It has been a tremendous burden upon me and my Campaigns to undertake this all alone, but it is our American Constitution. The qualifications of the President are like the nucleus of that document.
It requires a strength of character to fight both the left and the right when political ambitions run deep. I could only wish that Hillary Clinton would have had more strength of character to shoulder the burden, but she has not and this is of her own making as far as a liability in consideration for the Office of the President regardless of how much money she has collected.
I have no doubt that when you abandon the central core of the Constitution, you open yourself up to being compromised in many different ways. Please, if you'd like to continue this fight I invite and ask for your help and support here.
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
WE GET IT AMERICA This is it OVER HALF OF AMERICA HAS GIVEN UP!
The news is hard sometimes because its not good. We have to face the facts that over half of America has given up., literally given up on their rights being upheld in the United States Constitution. I make this plea to every leader of a group who has not given up; every Face Book Administrator I'm talking to you; every Tea Party Group this is for you; Every Patriot Organization sitting around the kitchen table this morning this is for you.
I woke up this morning at 6:15AM to this message from Diane Lenning who lives in Los Angeles, California and was responding to my Post in the Arpaio Eligibility Discussion Group on Facebook. Her message said:
[The POINT Sean and Mark, et al, is that We Allowed the "Natural Born Citizen REQUIREMENT" to Be NULLIFIED...Therefore, OPENING the FLOOD-GATES for Obama to Do Whatever He Wanted! Don't You All See that the "Natural Born-Citizen REQUIREMENT" was "THE SAFEGUARD" the Founding Fathers Put in the Constitution for POSTERITY (US)to Keep People OUT of the PRESIDENCY who Might have "Evil or Un-American Intentions." It's so SIMPLE, the Founding Fathers Probably Thought Even the Low-Level Intellectuals in SOCIETY would SURELY GET THIS! [It's Unbelievable High-Level Officials Have IGNORED This "FAILSAFE MECHANISM!]
I've tried to copy her message with capitalization correctly placed as she wrote it. Our Constitution while its not long a 2000 page document for only lawyers, politicians, and judges to read did much the same as Diane has done here for emphasis on words that were capitalized in the middle of a sentence. For example in part of the enumerations describing the powers of Congress Art. I Sect 8 Clause 10 in part reads "..and Offense against the Law of Nations;"
The Law of Nations was a book our Founding Fathers revered quite highly and referred to often in drafting our Constitution. written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19,§ 212. Of the citizens and natives.
“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.” Birther.org
Thank you Diane for your comment and message. I responded to Diane as follows.
[Thanks Diane Lenning for that, very well said. Now, for a minute understand:
First - Courts require "Standing" - someone whose actually in the Pres Race that can show actual damages who ran in '08 '12 and is still running or you lose claim.
Two- the Media requires an accountability under the Constitution without reqard to Race or they stigmatize you a racist.
And I'm the ONLY candidate in America who did and fills both they won't give me the time of day..or a single dollar of support.
We are in a tight spot Americans! What should we do cuz to say I'm getting squeezed between duty and survival is an understatement. ]
Its very true. Yesterday I was booted out of a FB Group and posted on my FB this Alert:
"PATRIOT CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT BOOTED OUT OF PATRIOT GROUP:
Dear Patriots: [Patriots United Against Obama Propaganda] 's administrator Diane Sori has just removed me from this group. I'm sorry I will not be posting any more information there about Judy v. Obama 14-4136 now being considered in the 10th Circuit Court. Her reason was stated that I should not 'dare' state I was anything like Benjamin Netanyahu as the BLOG POST referenced we were fighting for our lives in this Country like Israel is fighting for theirs in the Middle East being small, out numbered and having so many enemies surrounding us as they do and clearly spells out the important reasons for this conclusion. She also stated in her post right before I was X'd from the group no 3rd party has a chance, which stigmatizes quite poignantly her support for Rhino's within the Republican Party. I'm very sorry to report this development as I've been a member of this group posting free and valuable information without re-numeration for well over two years and feel I was at least responsible for seeing it grow during that time. Patriots United Against Obama Propaganda again will not be updated due to the loss of freedom and liberty met in the indefensible argument of their Administrator Ms. Sori. Please pass this on to all the Patriots you may know as a message of intelligence for the group of approximately 1200 members. Cody Robert Judy Candidate for Pres 2016 http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/03/sometimes-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-enemy.html
Diane Sori's reason's for giving me the boot were three fold. One AFTER she clicked my post and went to my Blog read the five page post, there appears a request for help to contribute. Two -There's also a link for people to get more information that I've written in my book Taking A Stand at the end of the piece. She called this "solicitations violating the group" that I've been a member of for over two years.The third reason she stated was because I did not affiliate myself as a Presidential Candidate with any particular party yet so she assumed I was a Third Party and she commented quite assertively that third party was just a ticket for the Democrats to win. In so many words basically saying I was a vagrant unwelcome in the politics of her American Group.
Another FB Group MAINSTREAM POLITICS Administrator had this to say.
Arlen Sanders Look, you don't seem like you're a bad guy. Here's the deal.
Expecting people to just read any old thing you post is not reasonable. This is a group of real people, not some bulletin board you post your BS to. We don't have time to read every paragraph of thought by some random dude.
Posting your blog repeatedly just identifies you as a some kind of commercial spammer.
We know how to go to a website and start a blog. Most here are not so self important as to do so.
The idea is to present something interesting to see if people want to discuss it. Maybe, a single sentence about how YOU feel about an issue.
Posting your blog repeatedly just makes you look self important and silly.
So, if you get repeatedly ignored for not actually engaging, you were warned.]
[Well, now that you hopefully understand, you can participate or head out on your way. No hard feelings]
From the same Group another Administrator said this about the a different post the day before and it should be noted I have only posted one time for each Piece or article I wrote. This group is only 145 Members.
Michael Holcombe [Your site, as all sites, will be treated with skepticism. The Conservatives, here, are disgusted by self-aggrandizement and propaganda. Therefore, it would surprise me if any went to your site for anything of "proof"-- we look for FACTS that sustain our beliefs in America. In other words: don't tell us on your blog, show us where you got your info, here, and we will determine whether or not your position is worth reading.
Because, honestly, you're not in the "mainstream" of anything... Or we'd have already discussed you, ad neauseum.]
My Comment:Cody Robert Judy- [Self aggrandizement self-ag·gran·dize·ment n. The act or practice of enhancing or exaggerating one's own importance, power, or reputation.
That's a really sad comment Michael Holcombe , especially considering the work involved with just the few links I've given you for information and 6 years in the Courts. All Courts to N.H. State Supreme Crt. All Courts up to Georgia's State Supreme Crt. U.S. Supreme Crt, and now U.S. District Utah Division in U.S. 10th Circuit. The culmination of all that legal work millions of dollars protecting your national security interest.
If you have no more gratitude than disparaging all that to self aggrandizement while I've been in your service without pay.. I feel very sorry for you Sir. ]
Michael Holcombe [Sir, if you are offended by a simple comment, and one that was pointed at your site; not at your PERSON, then you, kind Sir, are definitely NOT the man for the job. That's number one.
Number two: don't you dare say you are spending millions of dollars for MY behalf; I don't even know you! If you want to go to Court, up to the Supremes, it is YOUR objective, sir, not mine. I will thank you for supporting the Constitution, but there are Judges whom I respect that humbly disagree with your position, standing in your way on the way to the SCOTUS. You are traveling your own path for your own reasons. Don't heap any emotional baggage (guilt) upon me!!
I tell you how you will be met by Conservative thinkers; not all, maybe, but many. If that doesn't suit you, sir, then change your position. But taking offense at civil discourse is the LibTard way of stifling debate... Are you a LibTard or are you a Conservative? Are you a Presidential MAN or an Obama-type DOUCHE?]
I'm a member of about 180 Groups and for the most part I have to say all are terrific and respectful of my post. The 'Mainstream Politics' Group is 150 Member Group and the 'Patriots United Against Obama Propaganda' is 1,200 member group. For smaller groups a news feed is usually slower so I would only post one time during a 24 hour period of time. For groups of over 5,000 members the news feed is fast. Meaning, a post you might make in a larger group is going to go down to the bottom of the 1,000 story list very fast and might not be seen by the 30,000 members the Group boast of having. This is the reason I have treated even small groups of 25 with my post. 25 readers of a story from a small group sometimes outnumbers the actual members that might see your post from a group as big as 30,000.
There is no way to post to all groups one must sit there and do it one at a time. So it takes me about two hours to get through the list and within eight hours you can figure your story post is at the bottom of the trough and no one is seeing it. A small semi daily newspaper in a town of about four hundred who read a story might describe realistically what happens with my publishing to 180 Groups on Facebook boasting a combined total of 500,000 Patriots.
It should also be realistically noted that since joining Facebook over eight years ago, I have received maybe a half a dozen contributions ranging from $5 to $20 total and I've never sold a book. The point being successful solicitation is weak at best on Facebook and the cause is either not understood, unheard, or of little value to Patriots. You can be the judge.
Many people get excited about a Candidate running for office who can self finance the whole campaign out of his/her own pocket. However the idea quickly regulates if you think about it into a Fascism or Fascistic Oligarchy-
a system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship, forcible suppression of opposition, private economic enterprise under centralized governmental control, belligerent nationalism, racism, and militarism, etc. A small clique of private citizens who exert a strong influence on government.
People who will spew hatred for George Soros-He is known as "The Man Who Broke the Bank of England" because of his short sale of US$10 billion worth of pounds, giving him a profit of $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis.[8][9][10] Soros is one of the thirty richest people in the world; and the Koch Brothers -The Koch family of industrialists and businesspeople is most notable for its control of Koch Industries, the second largest privately owned company in the United States because of the Campaign Contributions and influence also would support a Mitt Romney or Donald Trump as a Candidate who can self-finance. I think I recall Mitt Romney dumping 17 Million into his failed 2008 Campaign and in 2012 he said you know I'm not going to do that again. I think even former Governor Jon Huntsman if I recall dumped 4.1 Million into his that was just a blip in the Campaign for President.
The truth is a Candidate is both loved and hated for contributions to his own campaign. If he's rich he's loved for contributions supporters see as a 'free trip' they can gain benefits from without contributing themselves. The opposition hates him for buying the Office and drowning out competition with his own dollars. There could be some truth to that. If he's poor rarely is the story about how much time and energy he puts into his Campaign of value, but is often more about failures of business that might translate to failures in the Office if elected.
Very Rarely does a story come a long about a candidate that is so pivotal as to rely on PRINCIPLE. This really should engage the patriots in a cause that is so much bigger then a simple campaign or run for office that egos is left out of the equation for everyone! It is astounding people 'think' I run for President as an 'ego' trip. In my own self thought and realism nothing has caused greater tribulation, assault, and trauma to me and my family than this! I am pained every day to give it up as well the Claim for America I have alone, based on taking a stand for it in 2008 against McCain and Obama and continuing that in 2012 on Obama to this day. That is the 'natural born Citizen' clause that let go reduces our national security to a state of foreign affairs and leaves our sovereignty in tatters. Now if that's your goal in a new world order at least admit it.
EVERY DAY it seems is a rotten tomatoes and egg-in-the-face day for me with malicious comments. The precious jewels in the comment section like Diane Lenning's are very few and far between and much more available are the ones like Michael Holcombe's and Arlen Sanders's. Even more traumatic is the principle in court that when and if an argument is not objected to in Court the issue lack of complaint stands as a suspension of the claim for 'lack of prosecution'.
What that means is if I just gave up after 2008 that my standing is also given up in a Claim for Justice and instead of having at least one Candidate for President braving the fierce winds of the opposing adversary America has none to stop anyone from entering the Office of the President and doing whatever they want in spite of campaign promises, in spite of anything, just as we are seeing Obama do. As Americans I ask you do you want to just give up and become subjects instead of Citizens?
The condition of my Candidacy is one of condemnation rather than celebration more often than not and it is with great pain that I speak of its dilapidation not because of my own effort but because of the lack of value you perhaps see in it. Now, I often take your cause into consideration heralding your own reasons in statments to me, "You have NEVER WON A SINGLE CASE!" Who of any importance has endorsed your Candidacy publicly? Please step forward? Huh?
While it is true I haven't won a single case, it is also true every case is and has been different in region, and complexion according to law. However, isn't the question as easily asked to you, "Is the principle worth taking a stand for and what have you contributed to the principle through my campaign that is unique in not being racist and having standing?" Who has financed my campaign so far? Who has endorsed it publicly?
Has Sheriff Joe Arpaio whose investigation I have submitted as evidence in my case? Has Sharon Rondeau at the Post&Email? Has Mike Volin who I just did an interview with on WOBC Radio? Has WND? Has Terry Lakin? Has Orly Taitz? Has Larry Klayman? Mario Apuzzo? Has Commander Kerchner? Has Fox? I really don't know any Birthers who have come out in an endorsement much the same as you'd see other important Candidates have important people endorse their campaign. I certainly do not have any elected officials endorsing my Campaign. Of Course 2016 election is aways off., but the Cause isn't. The Cause is being fought here and now and while I appreciate the very few invites and publishing credits, we have got a war going on and we using plastic utensils left over from the picnic last summer to fight with instead of a few dollars in your wallet and I really believe we can do much better especially given the gravity of the circumstances.
Twenty Five years ago I undertook building a house by myself and I accomplished that in 5 months entirely minus a couple of days two others helped me lifting heavy beams on the roof, and in hooking the electric panel up that had to be done by a certified electrician. I did everything else by myself. Many during the process said it could not be done. When I finished it, the foundation, framing,roofing, pluming,electricity,gas,heating, and cooling systems were all finished had all been inspected and passed and I walked into the bank with a product that was valued over half of what I owed in land and materials. Not many people start out in life with their house half paid off. The value was in sweat equity. If I had to pay every contractor and their helpers to do what I'd done the 50% I owned would have been used to pay them. Did the bank care who had done the work? No, they only valued the House finished.
In much the same fashion have my Campaigns been built and they represented products of value that a lot of time and energy went into. I saw the value in my expertise in building my own house but the house I've built in my Campaigns serves much more and many more then myself. It serves every American and its the only one. Now does that mean there are not other campaigns? No, of course not, but lets all face a fact. Not one other campaign bares the stripes of suing McCain in Court and Obama in 2008, 2012, and now a 2016 Campaign with the natural born Citizen principle in tact.
And what are the consequences of losing the Claim again as Diane pointed out she understood very clearly? "to Keep People OUT of the PRESIDENCY who Might have "Evil or Un-American Intentions." So America, what are your intentions? The only 'threshhold' or BEAM of Principle found in the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land placed there for your protections your allowing to be sawed and chipped away like a main barring wall or foundation, and wondering if the House will fall down when its cut completely in half? Cant you already see the damages or do you need it to collapse?
I certainly don't like using 'guilt' as a tool to get Americans to realize they should donate or contribute to my campaign. Much rather just say "Hey, got a good campaign here Please Contribute" and have every body get what I was saying. But the truth is there are a lot of campaigns saying exactly that and they outright do not support the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen' as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents inviting through the front door any foreigner to come in and wreck or topple America's house. Of course they may hope Obama is not successful with that because there are so many people standing in his way like? Congress?
The same Congress controlled by Republicans who just caved into funding the Department of Homeland Security and paved the way for ObamaAmnesty to be unopposed. Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu just addressed Congress over the threat the Iran might get the nuclear bomb and threaten his Country with annihilation. Diane Sori, not to be confused with Diane Lenning herein, was greatly incensed that I attribute any likeness with Israels' threat and his responsibility to that of my own in standing up as I have the last 6 years against those who would dilute the qualifications for President in our Constitution to the same qualification of a U.S. Representative or U.S. Senator in the face of so much more responsibility. She actually wrote to me "Don't you dare compare yourself to Prime Minister Netanyahu he is so much more a man than you".
Ego set aside as best as one can objectively do so, and giving Israel's Prime Minister all the respect he mentioned about Obama, because it wouldn't be appropriate for him to come in and say what I do about Obama not being a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President by the declaration of the U.S. Constitution, Ms. Sori is right. Israel's Nation in 8.1 million is in population smaller than New York city's 8.4 million. Mayor Rudy Giuliani was the mayor of NYC at a disastrous time during 9/11. Of course neither man wants to go through anything like that again and they would pretty much say anything necessary to see to that responsibility. We call that being a good leader.
American's population is around 320 Million and the disaster happening to everyone and our future generations combined is what I see as my responsibility in keeping the Claim current on the 'natural born Citizen' clause demanded for our President so no one can come in and do to America what a Usurping Despot would do. It is true, I shouldn't compare 320 MILLION AMERICANS and their futures to 8.1 MILLION people in Israel as equal because it is not, but she shouldn't either. Neither should the natural born Citizen clause and a candidate as myself who embodies anti-discrimination on that principle be under valued and taken for granted, but that is exactly what is happening America, if we look at the facts.
Ms. Sori said something else I want to touch on. She said in her justification 'notice' to me that a third party candidate could not possible win and therefore represented basically a nuisance to the integrity of a two party system. Also examining the truth of that statement. For many 'good and evil' is a two sided choice. You either is or you aint. Its black or white. As I thought about that in regards to the natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution I came to the platform of truth that said 'right' again. When Democrats and Republicans team up against a principle in the Constitution they are considered "ONE" and the only difference is "ONE" other apposed to their stand together. So your left with again with the analysis a two party system. The difference being Republicans/Democrats are One and another choice is Independent. One is for the U.S. Constitution the other is against it. One is taking a stand the other is not. Its very clear.
SUSTAINING AND MAINTAINING
American's like to think the contribution of responsibility to America constitutes 'maybe' showing up to vote on the first Tuesday of November fully 30% don't even do that. I've got the book WASHINGTON by Michael Kammen which is an abridgment of the 7-Volume Biography written by Pulitzer Prize winning Richard Harwell. The Kammen abridgment is over 750 pages.
In reflecting upon that I'm constantly reminded how it was a constant battle of General Washington facing a revolution to keep his army maintained in clothes and food. It was often in the most deplorable circumstances he plead to Congress and the people they represented for bare maintenance and then a sustaining of those bare conditions. A fight for food and clothing from those who benefited from the fight with freedom and liberty seemed as constant as actually fighting the enemy and squeezing the trigger.
Sometimes people think because they gave one time that they have full filled responsibility. I was thinking the other day about a dozen contributions that rolled in to my campaign totaling about $500. Whew, what a relief that was for a week in a 72 month campaign so far. The need is dire and this is it America. A contribution of five or twenty dollars a month for the next two years is a responsible sustaining and maintaining numeracy for low income people and really should be much higher for those who are doing over $100,000 per year with the blessed opportunity America provides.
You know what the alternative is? Of course you should see it as writing on the wall with what Obama has done every two years to you in collapsing the freedoms and liberties in a sense to a prison fence getting closer and closer to making you an individual cell. Do I need to actually write to you and tell you of the deplorable conditions I am suffering to get you to understand how important your help is?
Well, my car has 243,000 miles on it I'm fixing it myself because I can't afford a mechanic. My most recent contribution was $63 dollars from my Mom, and $20 from my Sister may God bless their souls for it was so needed for food. You know I have never taken a federal dollar for food, housing, or transportation while running my campaigns although my Court filing fees proceeded informa pauperis. While I've lived modestly in a one bedroom studio apartment so I could sustaining myself at a bare minimum and devote most of my time to doing the very important work that needed to be done in the Campaign and for the Cause, the true consideration that is given is indeed love. I love you America.
I love America's Freedom and Liberty provided in the U.S. Constitution having suffered the loss of freedom in prison when the principles were in fact trod under foot. That value is ingrained in me deep as 3018 days you'd spend and hated in your bathroom Cell. Its a scar for life deep in my heart that gets re-opened constantly. The difference between Sen. Ted Cruz's father and my own experience is mine didn't happen in Cuba. I'm an American and it happened to me right here in America. Am I using the bad experience I suffered to channel a good civil course of productivity in solutions? I hope so.
This is not just a political Campaign its a Cause and the value attached to it is Freedom and Liberty for you and generations to come. If you doubt that you only need to run down the list of what Obama is doing and has done in the transformation of America. Many have supposed they could stop Obama based on something less than the Constitution. Even Republicans in Congress were quite confident in their proposals of stopping ObamaAmnesty by defunding Homeland Security Department. How many potential candidates for President have you heard say the first thing they would do was repeal or 'defund' the disaster of ObamaCare? Right, if Congress isn't doing it, you think a candidate for President can?
The only thing with 'teeth' to stop Obama is the U.S. Constitution #1- The office of the President requires a natural born Citizen. Obama fails this qualification. #2- The requirement for passing legislation is an eligible President's signature along with passage in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate. The checks and balances. The entire Obama Administration and its history depends on this clause of qualification. Don't let Republican or Democrats hood wink you into believing anything else. They know the requirements for Representatives and Senators is different than for the President and it is incompetency and fraud in the least degree and treason at the worst in illegal construction on the Constitution to represent in official capacity otherwise.
Where are the Candidates for President with standing taking a stand for this in its entirety across the spectrum of both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party and the Independent Party? This is a fact. There is only one: me. I majored in Psychology in College. Your welcome to take a look at my grades graduating with a 3.7 GPA. They aren't hidden like Obama has hidden his. Is acknowledging that fact I'm the only one in America a point of self aggrandizement? Self aggrandizement is based on exaggerations of self importance. To deny the facts is alternatively considered a state of denial or delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.
Obama's success has been built on America's delusion and I'm trying with all I have to snap America out of it and get America to rely on the facts that our Constitution's demand for President is not "Citizen", its "natural born Citizen". Upon this hangs Obama and everything he has signed in my Claim of damages! I need your help to maintain that claim.
If we give it up its gone. Your house is gone. Do you understand that? Your children's safety is gone! Our national security it breached and we are over-run!
That has not happened yet, but the process is right in front of you every day in the news. Amnesty's country within a country, the internet spy program, the patriot act, the affordable health care, the federal control of your local police departments, education in common core..we all know the list. Its out in the news every day while the Constitution is under attack in almost every aspect of Obama's Agenda. Why complain about any of them when all of them really are hinged on Obama's Eligibility?
Can the importance of this fight be underestimated? Can I forbid my mouth from opening to Congress or the people on Facebook and Twitter in the needs and the likelihood of success with your support? I've done my best to explain it to you and I think I've done it in more words then were necessary but a BIG SIGN that says A GOOD CAUSE has not worked. So what if the 10th Circuit says "No"? Do you think we should give up or do you think we go appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Going to the next Court requires more money, more time and without your help its not likely to happen given my own depletion of funds. if the Tenth Circuit Court says "Yes" we need funds to proceed. Witnesses might have to be flown in, attendance to the Court is usually a requirement. How does America expect this to happen? Are we even prepared for it to happen? The answer is I wouldn't be typing this out if we were fully prepared or if your help was not crucially needed.
Well, you have to decide what its worth and the value of it yourself. For my part I have described and begged for your help. There's a point in time when like Mitt Romney said this isn't about my Ego and if Americans don't want to pitch in and finance a campaign together they are not likely to win the maintenance of freedom and liberty and may be destined to lose it all. I always said the deciding factor of Mitt Romney's loss was a fundamental embarrassment of the Principles the Office of the President, and the demands it be stood up for, in the duties of the Office to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I really think the most important of all the principles in the whole Constitution is the 'natural born Citizen' requirement for the Office of the President. This has been figured out by our enemies also.
We have long accounted Obama the biggest fraud in America. The malignancy of that fraud is the infection of the Office of the President in the natural born Citizen qualification demand for health in the head. If the head is sick how well is the body able to perform?
In Israel’s P.M.’s words, “My friend, standing up to Iran is not easy. Standing up to dark and murderous regimes never is.” We face similar enemies in people who think the Supreme Law of the Land is not the Supreme Law of the Land anymore when it comes to Obama. All Patriot's should be able to figure this out and come to some conclusions that necessitate actions in helping support with contributions over lip service. You can look at yourself in the mirror everyday and ask "Am I a Patriot or a Tyrant in my actions and how are the conclusions reached?"
BREAKING NEWS: JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., 14-4136 RESULTS OF POLL JUST CAME IN UPDATE POST
As PROMISED: ,I said I would keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is. I received this ORDER from the Court last night about 6pm. The results of the Poll taken by the Court on a rehearing consideration was negative America. The same Court that has honored individual rights for each American to 'marry' has rejected the petition for every American to have the same applications of qualifications applied when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President in this Rehearing En Banc.
This is a deeply upsetting and nefarious discrimination and outrage America upon all of our rights. Today, the Court handed down a poll that said they were not interested in equal rights under the law. A decision that said Obama is an exception and Cody's rights do not count. This is a decision that we would equate to turning back the clock and seeing the Court adopt acceptable forms of slavery based on color. Its a day when we see the Court rolling the rights back that so many Civil Rights Leaders have fought and bled and born the stripes. A sad day for those celebrating in Selma and a reminder of the fight that still needs to be fought.
A day has come to the Court Steps that the full Court has adopted 'elite' babies and rejected those 'poor' ones in an economical and judicial hypocritical nazi eugenics outrage! The Court practice of engaging 'Individual rights' in the same behavior or activity to proceed in marriage but that deny to me the same practices in which to run a fair race for the Office of the Presidency for which they have criticized me in their adoption of hypocrisy is staggering to the Civil Mind.
The Court has repelled the advise of the United States Supreme Court that a 'natural born Citizen' was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' so advised in Minor v. Happersett and invited the reinstitution of slavery upon the heads of every minority person standing in the welfare line with such sullied discrimination. It truly is a sad day for Equal Justice in America and I just don't know if America sees what is happening or gets it? Evan those opposed to me as a Candidate for President ought to be concerned and at the very least sustaining the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President be applied equally to all Americans according to the Constitutions obvious and acknowledged responsibilities to that office.
Today we see the Court refuse to do that and dishonor the Office of the President. The Court refused to honor the tradition of "Justice For All" in America, burned the pledge of allegiance of all Americans, and blew the ashes in our eyes America.
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take this and report this ASSAULT upon your Constitution to the U.S. Supreme Court!
CRJ
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
FEATURED EDITORIAL- THE POST & EMAIL America's FIGHT for Civility
The News day is slow, reporters, journalist, and TV Anchorman are yearning for some heads to roll to make or report a story on. The Pulitzer Prize for an article, recognition, a big star on the resume is just one story away. Violence is so often reported on by the Media in print,on the radio and TV that Americans when fully emerged can barely hold down their lunches.
Of course a Pulitzer Prize is a good goal. Its the touchdown of print in the Superbowl. That's is why it is so very interesting that most all the people involved in the game of printing are so reluctant to report the truth on Obama's not being qualified for the Office of the President.
February 25th,2015 a very big reporter Charles C. Johnson made a swan dive in Twittering that was reported by BIRTHER REPORT. His self reported Bio- 'Charles C. Johnson is an investigative journalist and author. He is a contributor to the Daily Caller. Most recently, he is author of Why Coolidge Matters: Leadership Lessons from America’s Most Underrated President (Encounter Books). He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New Criterion, The American Spectator, The Claremont Review of Books, City Journal, Reason.com, National Review Online, Tablet Magazine, The Weekly Standard, Powerline, and The New York Sun. His work has been featured on Real Clear Politics, the Drudge Report, Hotair.com, The Blaze, Breitbart.com, Rush Limbaugh’s Show, and the Wall Street Journal’s Best of the Web. He has been on Fox News with Megyn Kelly, Sean Hannity, and Lou Dobbs and numerous radio programs, including Larry Elder, John Batchelor, Rusty Humphries, Dennis Prager, Larry Elder, Mark Levin, and Larry Kudlow. - Charles Johnson.'
His Twitter Dive included
1)How much would you enjoy a foreign government leaking their file on Obama?
2)How days did Obama really spend in Pakistan when he was younger?
3)I know most of the classes that Obama took at Occidental & Columbia.
4)Why has no one ever profiled Obama's gay roommate Sohale Siddiqi?
5)Why did Obama's mother live in Pakistan during the '80s & Indonesia in the '60s?
6)Why has no one ever found any of the black women whose "hearts" Obama says he broke in "his" book?
7)Why did Obama join the gay club at Occidental College upon entrance in 1979?
8)Is there any real evidence that Barack Obama the first ever came to Hawaii in 1971? Cc: @DineshDSouza
9)Why did Obama's grandfather have an FBI file?
10)Why do none of the Obamas have proof of communications with Barack Obama before 1988?
11)Why is there no evidence that Obama's grandfather ever sold furniture in Hawaii despite the depiction of him selling it in Obama's book?
12)Should I publish who really funded Barack Obama the first's education in Hawaii? (I replied to this one)
13)Is there anyone in Hawaii who remembers Obama's "father" coming to his school in 1971?
My reply to the 12th one was as follows:
"@ChuckCJohnson Publish wht Matters has COTUS teeth JUDY V. OBAMA 14-4136 10TH CIR. @DRUDGE #Birthers R right. #America #CivilRights answers!"
My point really is why are America's Newspapers not reporting a very precedent case in American History to the Public in the Civil Rights case involving two Presidential Candidates in a dispute of one Campaign hurting the another's Campaign by the disregard of the United States Constitution's definition of what a 'natural born Citizen' is that would indeed knock the one out of the White House? Does anyone remember Watergate or the initial cover up?
This is especially meritorious or relevant because February 24th the L.A. Times went Birther on Sen. Ted Cruz. The story questioned Sen. Ted Cruz's constitutional qualifications to occupy the Office of the President due to two first generation foreign citizenship's in his person. He receives one from Canada being born there, and one from his father as a Cuban at the time of his birth. Isn't this the height of party publishing rather than a Publisher Publishing?
The question then becomes are Pulitzer's dependent upon Political Parties rather than stories at all and if so, how big of a dis-service is that to the American Public? Perhaps this is why newspapers are struggling with their place in the new age of the internet and it might also be why Government is working so hard to regulate what they see as a source of truth to manipulate in net neutrality?
Staying in the lines seems to make the best picture when coloring. We learn that in Kindergarten coloring assignments. So, suddenly the natural born Citizen clause distinct from the 'citizen' requirement of a U.S. Rep or U.S. Sen, is obscure to Newspapers and really needs to be 'clarified' before 2016? Why not now in 2015 when the case involves Obama whose birth certificate and draft registration have been determined to be a fabrications that didn't pass a Law Enforcement Investigation scrutiny?
With my case(s) as a Presidential Candidate involving first McCain and then Obama in '08,'12,'13, and now'14 not only is the 'natural born Citizen' clause placed upon the Justice Scales in a case which is unique in American History, and backed up by the closest case understood in the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett where we see its clear, "There was never a doubt to that those who were Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents are natural born Citizens', but the damages asserted and clearly required for standing are made.
A real maliciousness is made upon Americans fight for civility if both the Courts and the Newspapers of today in Mainstream Media actually deny the harm and damages caused by such a disregard to the principle in the Constitution defining the qualifications of the President and Commander-In-Chief. We as Americans must see this for what it actually is. If the Court refuses to hear and clarify as the Media fails to report and bring the alert to Americans via the print industry, we must state the result is an assault upon civility and an invitation to war.
The Post & Email just released a story by Sharon Rondeau pointing out this exact controversy. "In a lengthy column on Wednesday former Nixon administration aide and Washington Times editorial column editor Monica Crowley wrote that Barack Hussein Obama was never vetted before attaining the presidency in 2008." The article entitled "The stranger in the White House", she writes, "As a result of their stalkerish obsession, the media never vetted Mr. Obama. While they have made sport of rummaging through Republican candidates’ garbage, college records and past romantic relationships, they refused to do even rudimentary investigative work into Mr. Obama’s background, education, family, friends and professional associates. Digging into Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s college years is called “vetting.” Digging into Mr. Obama’s college years is called “racism.”
Crowley continued at least giving some answers of just what may have happened to the press, "Once he became president, he used the full force of the White House to intimidate and punish folks who refused to play along. From the monitoring of opponents of Obamacare to the use of the Internal Revenue Service against tea party critics to the punishing of newspapers and individual journalists who dared to report the truth about its “war” on Fox News, Team Obama called out, dressed down and froze out folks who did not toe the line.Nobody has been allowed to get close to the origins of Mr. Obama, or to how they inform what he’s doing as president."
WE the PEOPLE have clearly made a case of words and law and petitioned the Courts in so many pleas and we haven't given up on that. That is exactly what my case represents that the full Court in the 10th Circuit is deciding now in a poll taken within the court. I called yesterday and was told by the Court Clerk that my Rehearing Request En Banc was still pending in the Court. I'd reported a little over two weeks ago that the Deputy Clerk had told me to call back in about two weeks if a decision had not been made yet which I did, so I felt an update to you was necessary.
As for the Media's Reluctance to at least inform the public of this case in print, I can only hold my hands up and report to you that at least 2-4 major newspapers in every state of the Union and 2 to 3 reporters of each Newspaper are indeed receiving these PRESS RELEASES, accept for Alaska and Hawaii which I just haven't got to yet, accept I have as you saw on the Text Screen picture petitioned Sarah Palin who kind of highlighted in my last post also as being on Team Rand who emphatically will not take a stand for the requirements of the Constitution's Q's for president. YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM
The denial of so many is of course a fear of being called 'racist', but on this issue specifically R's and D's have teamed up with three of the major Candidates for President Sen. McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Barack Obama in non-binding U.S. Sen. resolution 511. This is the biggest reason both R's and D's are not petitioning the courts on the definition. They teamed up to usurp the definition, but that is not how America works.
The People are very unslaked with the party politics involved in both reporting the news and hearing the case. The dictum of civility is being pressed as the focus is neglected in the scales of justice. To say America has been and is engaged in exhausting peaceful prospects is not dilatory. To her credit, the rewards of civility have been America's honor and beauty affording people of all sects, colors, and cultures a process of peace. Let us all pray it remains so.
I'll keep you updated as things happen and discuss this more in detail so pass it on and keep checking back. Thanks so much for your help and support needed at this time more then ever. Remember every "like" and every "share" is very important America!
Sincerely,
CRJ
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
.jpg)
