Showing posts with label psalms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psalms. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

PLATFORM of a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE - Shield of Reflected Truth and the Value Appreciated by Trump




 PLATFORM of a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE -
 The Shield of Reflected Truth & Value Appreciated by Trump
What does your Candidate for President Reflect in his Shield of Truth? 
Featured Editorial - The Post & Email

Within the political platforms of every Candidate for the United States are of course their very ideas of how they would be the very best President and the reason why people should consider them in their vote. A Platform is a very important thing to have as a Candidate for President of the United States. It is the mirror of ideas that are representative as a Reflection or guide for that Candidate by which people put their trust in a vote for that person. It is invaluable and is not taken lightly, but is nearly sacred and lifesaving. It will be used as shield against the fiery darts of an adversary and those whom use their shields well are then protected, and able wield their sword.

Psalms 91:4 " He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler'.


Many people might know me because of my Case in the United States Supreme Court which challenges the very audacity of Barack Obama to actually even be in the Office of the President with the standards of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications for that office which are unique from a U.S. Representative or U.S. Senator.

Like three degrees of glory in the stars, the moon, and the sun, every category of the three designed qualifications in our U.S. Constitution are extended and made harder and higher for the Office of the President then those of Senator or Representative.

So what does it say about those who wish to lower the standards of the Office of the President, and who would actually wish it so? Tell you what, let's get back to that later and let's talk a little about Platform, why its so important and we will do a little investigating on mine, and why it is so good that other Major Candidates are borrowing or plagiarizing my ideas.

You might say that a Platform is very easily copied. What is to stop one candidate from say, checking out the platform of another Candidate and saying, "Hey, that works could and I think I'll use it in the same order and try to win with it"? How serious is this when it comes to unique and special ideas when your looking at Candidates?

Well its very serious to Candidates. Especially if they come with a unique and special idea in their Platform, someone picks it out of their wallet, and moves on for the win in the same office they were going for.  The same can be said of any original artist and their song, movie, poem, or speech.  How successful is a Candidate who gets up and says, "I have a Dream" and then tells everyone that's original and trademarked when everyone knows Martin Luther King Jr. uttered those words in a very famous speech.

Another example I love Democratic Party President John Fitzgerald Kennedy's speech in that he said, "My fellow Americans, Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your Country.", and he continued, "To my fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for freedom."

Now these are very famous speeches heard round the world. They have well deserved reputations by the number of ears who have heard them. We just would not expect the two leaders of the Major Parties to jump up on their podium and re-state those words without a credit to them in passing respectful reference to whose speech they were. Just to give you an idea of how important speeches are and the credit that should be assigned, or sought out with all diligence you may recall a Candidate for President named Joe Biden who didn't think anyone would notice as he didn't mention the words of a speech made by a Leader of the Labor Party over in the United Kingdom for heck sake for his own benefit in 1988. It wasn't even in the U.S. and still was a major factor!

DEMOCRATIC PARTY PROBLEMS and REMEMBERING JOE BIDEN'S SPEECH

It doomed his Campaign!
[ Biden announced his candidacy in June 1987, and was considered one of the potentially strongest candidates in the field. However, in September 1987, newspaper stories stated he had plagiarized a speech by British politician Neil Kinnock. Other allegations of past law school plagiarism and exaggerating his academic record soon followed. Biden withdrew from the race later that month
Major controversy beset Biden's candidacy, beginning on September 12, 1987 with high-profile articles in The New York Times and The Des Moines Register.[19]Biden was accused of plagiarizing a speech by Neil Kinnock, leader of the British Labour Party.[20] Kinnock's speech, delivered to a Welsh Labour Party conference on May 15, 1987, and then rebroadcast during the UK 1987 general election, included the lines:
While Biden's speech included the lines:
Isn't that amazing ..1988 twenty-seven years ago, during a Presidential Election he blows it and the Democrats are thinking about bringing Joe back hoping no one remembers and suddenly Joe Biden's awash in new and transforming ideas that's going to get us out of the mess we are in? The subjects in the speeches were for all intensive purposes benign of course, but it was enough to raise questions about authenticity, genuineness, and truth.

When it comes to being American, Truth, Genuineness, and Authenticity are things that we look for in the Vision of where we want to go and how we want to get there. Now Mr. Biden's not sure he's got the mojo for another Presidential Race and we'd all have to kind of agree his escort up to the 'wings' of the stage is really due to Mrs. Clinton's sack-of-emails on her private server during a tenure at Secretary of State being mopped up by Carly Fiorina now, and also the list of play-to-pay foreign and domestic contributors to the Clinton Foundation which do cross over through Sidney Blumenthol and perhaps the destruction of evidence in Mrs. Clinton's choices to pick and choose which emails on her server got deleted and which ones did not.

This has the affect of self policing but it also is anti-FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Request which in many ways acts as the people's and press's Public Court. These problems are a direct result of a 9 point cannon ball drop in Mrs. Clinton's poll numbers and a 15 point drop among Democrats.

REPUBLICANS ARE NOT WITHOUT THEIR PROBLEMS
TRUMPS COPYCAT PLATFORM

Sen. Marco Rubio, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Gov. Bobby Jindal have actually been the subjects of a controversy in the U.S. Supreme Court considerations of eligibility, not many people know, in a current case in the U.S. Supreme Court. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 asked for an extension of time the Court ultimately refused as Application 25A15   Not Reported by the News.

Sen. Rand Paul in many stories favored and thought to be the wonder of the Republican Party Primary at one time released a book- Taking A Stand -moving beyond partisan politics to united America. Now, one would have thought if you were the publishers of this book and the author, that a little research on the Title of the book and related authors might have been in order. He stole the title of my book Taking A Stand -the conservative independent voice which came out in 2008 and we are running for the same office. How stupid is that? You would think even in the same arena as politics, you might change your title, but simply running a search on the title and Presidential Candidates you would definitely change the title. He didn't. Now he's way down in the Polls.  Not Reported by the News.

And the Leading Republican Poll Candidate for President Donald Trump has for all intensive purposes plagiarized my Platform for President. Mr. Trump blast the other Candidates for President are stupid- America's got stupid leaders compared to Mexico, Japan, China. How many times have we heard that now?

So what does it say for Mr. Trump when he is swiping pretty specifically, which you can identify very clearly here, two of the three Ropes of my THREE ROPES INITIATIVES PLATFORM that have been around in my Presidential Platform in 2008, and 2012?  Well, I'm thrilled. Good Idea's should indeed cross the isles of republican and democrat if they are indeed good ideas don't you think?

But remember what happened to Joe Biden for basically referring to his family,  a thousand generations, and college in the same mouthful as England's Leader in the Labor Party? What? Should Mr. Trump now be accused of siphoning good Democratic Party ideas because I ran as a Democratic Party Candidate and he is now leading the Republican Party by double digits with my ideas and Platform toting that he is the one who  brought it up and without him we wouldn't even be discussing 'illegal immigration' and  a strategy of war reparations I have announced as a 35% tax upon foreign governments using our Military and then saying 'good bye' and 'thanks', but we do not like investing in America?

Watch my Three Ropes Initiatives Platform Video and then compare Donald Trump's Platform and realize how many people are thinking he is great for these ideas that I have had on my Presidential Web Site in 2008 and 2012. Look, this video was uploaded December 17th, 2011 and Mr. Trump is using it to lead the whole Republican Party and all 16 other Candidates. What does that tell you about CRJ's Platform? Its' dynamite!

CRJ's THREE ROPES INITIATIVES



Now here are some clips of Mr. Trump 'using the same ideas' of my Platform:
1- Building a Wall to Secure the Border- 10 Must read Quotes for Sean Hannity Interview

DONALD TRUMP, GOP PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATEIn China, the great China wall, I mean, you want to talk about a wall, that is a serious wall, OK. That you don't climb over it with a ladder. You don't even go under it, OK?
That wall is 13,000 miles. If you add up everything in the kitchen sink with what we're talking about on our border, it's less than 2,000 miles and a lot of it you don't have to do because you covered it with terrain and you covered with areas that you have already built.
2-TRUMP SAYS MIDDLE EAST WOULD PAY FOR US TROOPS Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is outlining a foreign policy in which the United States would put ground troops in the fight against Islamic State militants and demand money from Middle East countries supported by the U.S.


"Let me tell you what I also would have done. Germany and all these countries -- Germany's doing a lot better than we're doing. Isn't it their battle more than ours? Why aren't they more involved? Why are we fighting so hard, and all of these countries in Europe are sort of, like, Well, OK, we'll keep taking the oil, we'll keep taking the gas, we'll keep giving money.

"What is it about us? We're so far away. We're fighting for -- I'm not saying don't do it, but I'll tell you what. I would make sure that all of those countries that have a much bigger stake than we do 
I'll give you an example. Saudi Arabia makes a billion dollars a day. We're protecting them. Why aren't they taking care of us? Why aren't they?"

Listen to what Mr. Trump say about Kuwait about the 9 minute to 11 minute mark.

Could we deduct from this that Mr. Trump watched my THREE ROPES INITIATIVES Platform video and is picking the very good ideas from it for his own rise and political popularity for the same office we are both running for?

I think that is a very easily drawn point with such specifics Mr. Trump has used even going so far to say a 30% tax for foreign governments who use our military. I agree as you can tell I mentioned years ago in my Candidacy for President and video 35% gratuity tax on foreign interventions. It is not right that American Citizens bear the total financial burden as well the blood burden and Kuwait is an excellent example of what kind of appreciation and respect we get after our good hearts stepped in against a dictator, while the other Countries in the Middle East enjoy our military protection.

Desert Storm was estimated at 61 Billion in cost. Kuwait and Saudi Arabia picked up a tab of 36 Billion. Germany and Japan covered 16 Billion, which left a 9 Billion dollar short fall and Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have made trillions since. This is a total lack of respect. 25% of Saudi Arabia's tab was in the form of 'in-kind' services and America lost the most blood of the allied forces, near 150 lives.

The foreign countries neither appreciate or respect us as we protected their money machine. Freedom and Liberty is never free, we as Americans live on the back of those who have given their lives for our U.S. Constitution. There should not be a question as to my defense, honor, and respect for that in my legal action to the U.S. Supreme Court which is going to brought up again September 28th which draws the picture of an  illegal usurpation of our Executive Branch in the Office of the President the total tab which could be estimated at about 10 Trillion. If we do not respect ourselves, who is going to respect us? We have to love ourselves and love that which has made us in the first place in order to continue.

 People might see this as a ploy or use of our military as a mercenary-for-hire, but that would mean we could be bought for money without a cause. America has a cause and that the Judgement in our call to assist is not reckoned in the interest of freedom and liberty would be an obnoxious malady. Protection is a big part of maintaining freedom and liberty and it is a viable export America can also earn respect for with those who get into trouble. Where they have an interest to protect their borders, and we have an interest in the ability, a fair and just respect mutually assured is certainly more of a common sense, then a very generous gift that keeps on giving forever and is totally unappreciated.

Of course encouraging our own oil production as well natural gas, and shale oil extraction can help us to push the next generation of innovative travel. We need to encourage this and wean ourselves off of carbon automobiles in favor of air streaming propulsion technologies for the public consumer. Carbon dependent Automobiles will become a thing of the past and we will not need to import as much and in a sense limit ourselves with dependency. I believe we can wean ourselves off this dependency and increase our innovative jobs in air travel and the next big thing many will desire that we export in staying ahead of the innovative mobility industry.

There are many many other things I have stored in my head that I believe will surprise a lot of people and my Platform is an outline that will indeed put America back on course. I am very happy Mr. Trump has elevated these items in my platform and hope he will appreciate them as coming from a Democratic Party Candidate for President, even if he's running in the Republican Party.

What does that also tell Democrats? Well, it should tell Democrats that if I am selected as their nominee that I have a very big capacity to attract a very large portion of the Republican Party necessary to win the White House. I look forward to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices again taking up the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case in less than 20 days now. I hope and pray our U.S. Constitution is upheld in the Qualifications of the President, more especially the 'natural born Citizen' clause that has been run over by Obama's tanks.

While this is a good reason to support my candidacy for President it certainly is not the only reason to and Mr. Trump's popularity among the Republicans and his platform that has been copied from my platform is a good reason to Notice that. Again, here is the Constitutional Reckoning of the Office of the President's qualifications in contrast to those of the Senator and Representative in a very short 2 minute video.

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up for what has given you so much. God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS






Thursday, December 20, 2012

SCOTUS ELECTION CHALLENGE Presents: The Compromise of the Sovereignty of a Nation


SCOTUS ELECTION CHALLENGE Presents: The Compromise of the Sovereignty of a Nation


Psalms 35:30-The mouth of the righteous speaketh wisdom, and his tongue talketh of judgment. 31- The law of his God is in his heart; none of his steps shall slide.
v.39 But the salvation of the righteous is of the Lord; he is their strength in the time of trouble. 40-And the Lord shall help them, and deliver them: he shall deliver them from the wicked, and save them, because they trusted in him.

What compromise is there of slavery? What compromise is there of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution demanded only for the Offices of the President and Vice President?

Shall we allow a few States of the Union to enjoy the benefits of a little slave labor like China does? It might save us a little gas on importing things if we just compromised a little on a few selected minorities. What would be wrong with that? You know a lot of the slaves in America said they were very happy with their masters?
Twas a heavy burden that President Abraham Lincoln bore in the judgment of sacrificing 620,000 lives in the cause of the future freedom of every man in America. The United States Constitution is celebrated in the 13th Amendment with more gratitude by the minorities it protected and set free, than by the majority. Often the value of a freedom is gained by the experience of the loss of it.

The Civil War may be over but the battles continue on both sides of the coin in America. Shall the State take over the custody of a women’s body in a type of slavery, forcing her to full term of an unwanted pregnancy? Shall an anchor baby, naturalized citizen, or a duel parented citizen like Obama for instance, of the United States be given the right as a ‘natural born citizen’ to aspire to the Office of the President?

The convenient term of “discrimination” has been slapped upon America as the whip of hope and change in the cessation of the principle of our Constitution’s demand for the Office of the President. Is it the minorities who see discrimination in the wisdom of our founding fathers that only for the Office of the President and Vice President was the qualification of a “natural born citizen” demanded, exterminating any foreign allegiance by birth or by parents, as the law of nature claims: born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents?

Can a black man be a natural born citizen, born in the United States to citizen parents? Can a man from oriental decent be a natural born citizen, born in the United States to citizen parents? Can any nationality in America be born in the United States to citizen parents? Of course!

So have I sued or taken issue with every white Republican who was running or thinking of running for President who was not a “natural born citizen” i.e. John McCain, Rick Santorum, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal? Yes, but that’s not good enough?

So why the underhanded stick of discrimination by the media in SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276, or the blood splashed on my car or the foul and disrespectful language for me as a Birther and defender of our Constitution? Is it really just for Obama?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI_mjqgaDQc
CRJ'S BLOOD STAINED CAR



Well, it’s not for Blacks, or Orientals, or Latino’s or any other nationality or minority, because they can all as they are born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, qualify for the Office of the President under the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen. So we are left to understand this whole cotton-pick’n thing is really just about one man whose name is Obama or Barry Soetoro.

So what are we to gather here? People who don’t care about the “Natural Born Citizen” clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President really are fighting for a return of slavery or abolishment of the 13th Amendment? Is that it? They’d like to enslave women and a few minorities with them?

Instead of “Qualification”, anti-birthers read “Discrimination” into the Constitution? Now what would cause them to do that if their motive was pure? I don’t think “ignorance” or lack of knowledge really qualifies in this case although it might in some cases, but what I can assure in their positions is this.

That if the Office of the President is compromised by a foreign influence, which is in fact discouraged by the qualification feature of the demand for a “natural born citizen”, (which by the way excludes dual citizenship), it is not for the cause of freedom and liberty, but for the cause which besets so many other Nations ruled with tyranny and subjugation of peoples and their properties.

If it is not for the cause of freedom and liberties established in our Constitution as inalienable rights for our citizens to enjoy, then it’s formidably understood why Obama wants to increase your taxes and diminish the Constitution. Swearing an oath to the Constitution as a violation of it, makes Obama’s lie, the extent he’s willing to compromise what he promises you.

“What will the poor serfs say?”, if everything Obama’s says is a lie? What will they do if for the greater good of 300 million people, Obama extinguishes the second amendment rights over the deaths of 300?

Obama’s language, “that for the greater good something needs to be done”, should be understood to mean the opposite of the greater portion of the population in America; because in his mind the greater good extends to include the whole world not subjugated under the United States Constitution, with all of its checks and balances, but under something most would say is much more exploitative of America as a sovereign nation.

If you haven’t got the picture of what America looks like without the Constitution, or with the Constitution compromised, you have no understanding or respect for freedom and liberty, taxation without representation, or the extended promises of politicians to sell America’s future generations into bondage through the national debt with absolutely no intentions of paying it off while they are in office.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I

America No Games Just You- CRJ Election Challenge 2012 


If you want a recipe for war keep mixing. If you want a recipe for peace then take a stand for the Constitution with me on the” natural born citizenship” demand for the Office of the President with a little more enthusiasm to exactly what you’re standing up for, and what you’re taking a stand against.

If you don’t think the Constitution’s important Congress and SCOTUS, then by all means retire your positions which are founded in the document along with our principles as the Supreme law of the land. Without the Constitution there is no Congress and their sure isn’t any need for a Supreme Court of the United States respectively as a Legislative and Judicial Branch check to the Executive Branch. As the Constitution goes, so do you.







Thanks for Passing it on, supporting or contributing in any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593


LINKS USED
http://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/document.html?doc=9&title.raw=13th%20Amendment%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A%20Abolition%20of%20Slavery

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm