Showing posts with label platform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label platform. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

PLATFORM of a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE - Shield of Reflected Truth and the Value Appreciated by Trump




 PLATFORM of a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE -
 The Shield of Reflected Truth & Value Appreciated by Trump
What does your Candidate for President Reflect in his Shield of Truth? 
Featured Editorial - The Post & Email

Within the political platforms of every Candidate for the United States are of course their very ideas of how they would be the very best President and the reason why people should consider them in their vote. A Platform is a very important thing to have as a Candidate for President of the United States. It is the mirror of ideas that are representative as a Reflection or guide for that Candidate by which people put their trust in a vote for that person. It is invaluable and is not taken lightly, but is nearly sacred and lifesaving. It will be used as shield against the fiery darts of an adversary and those whom use their shields well are then protected, and able wield their sword.

Psalms 91:4 " He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler'.


Many people might know me because of my Case in the United States Supreme Court which challenges the very audacity of Barack Obama to actually even be in the Office of the President with the standards of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications for that office which are unique from a U.S. Representative or U.S. Senator.

Like three degrees of glory in the stars, the moon, and the sun, every category of the three designed qualifications in our U.S. Constitution are extended and made harder and higher for the Office of the President then those of Senator or Representative.

So what does it say about those who wish to lower the standards of the Office of the President, and who would actually wish it so? Tell you what, let's get back to that later and let's talk a little about Platform, why its so important and we will do a little investigating on mine, and why it is so good that other Major Candidates are borrowing or plagiarizing my ideas.

You might say that a Platform is very easily copied. What is to stop one candidate from say, checking out the platform of another Candidate and saying, "Hey, that works could and I think I'll use it in the same order and try to win with it"? How serious is this when it comes to unique and special ideas when your looking at Candidates?

Well its very serious to Candidates. Especially if they come with a unique and special idea in their Platform, someone picks it out of their wallet, and moves on for the win in the same office they were going for.  The same can be said of any original artist and their song, movie, poem, or speech.  How successful is a Candidate who gets up and says, "I have a Dream" and then tells everyone that's original and trademarked when everyone knows Martin Luther King Jr. uttered those words in a very famous speech.

Another example I love Democratic Party President John Fitzgerald Kennedy's speech in that he said, "My fellow Americans, Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your Country.", and he continued, "To my fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for freedom."

Now these are very famous speeches heard round the world. They have well deserved reputations by the number of ears who have heard them. We just would not expect the two leaders of the Major Parties to jump up on their podium and re-state those words without a credit to them in passing respectful reference to whose speech they were. Just to give you an idea of how important speeches are and the credit that should be assigned, or sought out with all diligence you may recall a Candidate for President named Joe Biden who didn't think anyone would notice as he didn't mention the words of a speech made by a Leader of the Labor Party over in the United Kingdom for heck sake for his own benefit in 1988. It wasn't even in the U.S. and still was a major factor!

DEMOCRATIC PARTY PROBLEMS and REMEMBERING JOE BIDEN'S SPEECH

It doomed his Campaign!
[ Biden announced his candidacy in June 1987, and was considered one of the potentially strongest candidates in the field. However, in September 1987, newspaper stories stated he had plagiarized a speech by British politician Neil Kinnock. Other allegations of past law school plagiarism and exaggerating his academic record soon followed. Biden withdrew from the race later that month
Major controversy beset Biden's candidacy, beginning on September 12, 1987 with high-profile articles in The New York Times and The Des Moines Register.[19]Biden was accused of plagiarizing a speech by Neil Kinnock, leader of the British Labour Party.[20] Kinnock's speech, delivered to a Welsh Labour Party conference on May 15, 1987, and then rebroadcast during the UK 1987 general election, included the lines:
While Biden's speech included the lines:
Isn't that amazing ..1988 twenty-seven years ago, during a Presidential Election he blows it and the Democrats are thinking about bringing Joe back hoping no one remembers and suddenly Joe Biden's awash in new and transforming ideas that's going to get us out of the mess we are in? The subjects in the speeches were for all intensive purposes benign of course, but it was enough to raise questions about authenticity, genuineness, and truth.

When it comes to being American, Truth, Genuineness, and Authenticity are things that we look for in the Vision of where we want to go and how we want to get there. Now Mr. Biden's not sure he's got the mojo for another Presidential Race and we'd all have to kind of agree his escort up to the 'wings' of the stage is really due to Mrs. Clinton's sack-of-emails on her private server during a tenure at Secretary of State being mopped up by Carly Fiorina now, and also the list of play-to-pay foreign and domestic contributors to the Clinton Foundation which do cross over through Sidney Blumenthol and perhaps the destruction of evidence in Mrs. Clinton's choices to pick and choose which emails on her server got deleted and which ones did not.

This has the affect of self policing but it also is anti-FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Request which in many ways acts as the people's and press's Public Court. These problems are a direct result of a 9 point cannon ball drop in Mrs. Clinton's poll numbers and a 15 point drop among Democrats.

REPUBLICANS ARE NOT WITHOUT THEIR PROBLEMS
TRUMPS COPYCAT PLATFORM

Sen. Marco Rubio, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Gov. Bobby Jindal have actually been the subjects of a controversy in the U.S. Supreme Court considerations of eligibility, not many people know, in a current case in the U.S. Supreme Court. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 asked for an extension of time the Court ultimately refused as Application 25A15   Not Reported by the News.

Sen. Rand Paul in many stories favored and thought to be the wonder of the Republican Party Primary at one time released a book- Taking A Stand -moving beyond partisan politics to united America. Now, one would have thought if you were the publishers of this book and the author, that a little research on the Title of the book and related authors might have been in order. He stole the title of my book Taking A Stand -the conservative independent voice which came out in 2008 and we are running for the same office. How stupid is that? You would think even in the same arena as politics, you might change your title, but simply running a search on the title and Presidential Candidates you would definitely change the title. He didn't. Now he's way down in the Polls.  Not Reported by the News.

And the Leading Republican Poll Candidate for President Donald Trump has for all intensive purposes plagiarized my Platform for President. Mr. Trump blast the other Candidates for President are stupid- America's got stupid leaders compared to Mexico, Japan, China. How many times have we heard that now?

So what does it say for Mr. Trump when he is swiping pretty specifically, which you can identify very clearly here, two of the three Ropes of my THREE ROPES INITIATIVES PLATFORM that have been around in my Presidential Platform in 2008, and 2012?  Well, I'm thrilled. Good Idea's should indeed cross the isles of republican and democrat if they are indeed good ideas don't you think?

But remember what happened to Joe Biden for basically referring to his family,  a thousand generations, and college in the same mouthful as England's Leader in the Labor Party? What? Should Mr. Trump now be accused of siphoning good Democratic Party ideas because I ran as a Democratic Party Candidate and he is now leading the Republican Party by double digits with my ideas and Platform toting that he is the one who  brought it up and without him we wouldn't even be discussing 'illegal immigration' and  a strategy of war reparations I have announced as a 35% tax upon foreign governments using our Military and then saying 'good bye' and 'thanks', but we do not like investing in America?

Watch my Three Ropes Initiatives Platform Video and then compare Donald Trump's Platform and realize how many people are thinking he is great for these ideas that I have had on my Presidential Web Site in 2008 and 2012. Look, this video was uploaded December 17th, 2011 and Mr. Trump is using it to lead the whole Republican Party and all 16 other Candidates. What does that tell you about CRJ's Platform? Its' dynamite!

CRJ's THREE ROPES INITIATIVES



Now here are some clips of Mr. Trump 'using the same ideas' of my Platform:
1- Building a Wall to Secure the Border- 10 Must read Quotes for Sean Hannity Interview

DONALD TRUMP, GOP PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATEIn China, the great China wall, I mean, you want to talk about a wall, that is a serious wall, OK. That you don't climb over it with a ladder. You don't even go under it, OK?
That wall is 13,000 miles. If you add up everything in the kitchen sink with what we're talking about on our border, it's less than 2,000 miles and a lot of it you don't have to do because you covered it with terrain and you covered with areas that you have already built.
2-TRUMP SAYS MIDDLE EAST WOULD PAY FOR US TROOPS Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is outlining a foreign policy in which the United States would put ground troops in the fight against Islamic State militants and demand money from Middle East countries supported by the U.S.


"Let me tell you what I also would have done. Germany and all these countries -- Germany's doing a lot better than we're doing. Isn't it their battle more than ours? Why aren't they more involved? Why are we fighting so hard, and all of these countries in Europe are sort of, like, Well, OK, we'll keep taking the oil, we'll keep taking the gas, we'll keep giving money.

"What is it about us? We're so far away. We're fighting for -- I'm not saying don't do it, but I'll tell you what. I would make sure that all of those countries that have a much bigger stake than we do 
I'll give you an example. Saudi Arabia makes a billion dollars a day. We're protecting them. Why aren't they taking care of us? Why aren't they?"

Listen to what Mr. Trump say about Kuwait about the 9 minute to 11 minute mark.

Could we deduct from this that Mr. Trump watched my THREE ROPES INITIATIVES Platform video and is picking the very good ideas from it for his own rise and political popularity for the same office we are both running for?

I think that is a very easily drawn point with such specifics Mr. Trump has used even going so far to say a 30% tax for foreign governments who use our military. I agree as you can tell I mentioned years ago in my Candidacy for President and video 35% gratuity tax on foreign interventions. It is not right that American Citizens bear the total financial burden as well the blood burden and Kuwait is an excellent example of what kind of appreciation and respect we get after our good hearts stepped in against a dictator, while the other Countries in the Middle East enjoy our military protection.

Desert Storm was estimated at 61 Billion in cost. Kuwait and Saudi Arabia picked up a tab of 36 Billion. Germany and Japan covered 16 Billion, which left a 9 Billion dollar short fall and Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have made trillions since. This is a total lack of respect. 25% of Saudi Arabia's tab was in the form of 'in-kind' services and America lost the most blood of the allied forces, near 150 lives.

The foreign countries neither appreciate or respect us as we protected their money machine. Freedom and Liberty is never free, we as Americans live on the back of those who have given their lives for our U.S. Constitution. There should not be a question as to my defense, honor, and respect for that in my legal action to the U.S. Supreme Court which is going to brought up again September 28th which draws the picture of an  illegal usurpation of our Executive Branch in the Office of the President the total tab which could be estimated at about 10 Trillion. If we do not respect ourselves, who is going to respect us? We have to love ourselves and love that which has made us in the first place in order to continue.

 People might see this as a ploy or use of our military as a mercenary-for-hire, but that would mean we could be bought for money without a cause. America has a cause and that the Judgement in our call to assist is not reckoned in the interest of freedom and liberty would be an obnoxious malady. Protection is a big part of maintaining freedom and liberty and it is a viable export America can also earn respect for with those who get into trouble. Where they have an interest to protect their borders, and we have an interest in the ability, a fair and just respect mutually assured is certainly more of a common sense, then a very generous gift that keeps on giving forever and is totally unappreciated.

Of course encouraging our own oil production as well natural gas, and shale oil extraction can help us to push the next generation of innovative travel. We need to encourage this and wean ourselves off of carbon automobiles in favor of air streaming propulsion technologies for the public consumer. Carbon dependent Automobiles will become a thing of the past and we will not need to import as much and in a sense limit ourselves with dependency. I believe we can wean ourselves off this dependency and increase our innovative jobs in air travel and the next big thing many will desire that we export in staying ahead of the innovative mobility industry.

There are many many other things I have stored in my head that I believe will surprise a lot of people and my Platform is an outline that will indeed put America back on course. I am very happy Mr. Trump has elevated these items in my platform and hope he will appreciate them as coming from a Democratic Party Candidate for President, even if he's running in the Republican Party.

What does that also tell Democrats? Well, it should tell Democrats that if I am selected as their nominee that I have a very big capacity to attract a very large portion of the Republican Party necessary to win the White House. I look forward to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices again taking up the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case in less than 20 days now. I hope and pray our U.S. Constitution is upheld in the Qualifications of the President, more especially the 'natural born Citizen' clause that has been run over by Obama's tanks.

While this is a good reason to support my candidacy for President it certainly is not the only reason to and Mr. Trump's popularity among the Republicans and his platform that has been copied from my platform is a good reason to Notice that. Again, here is the Constitutional Reckoning of the Office of the President's qualifications in contrast to those of the Senator and Representative in a very short 2 minute video.

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up for what has given you so much. God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS






Sunday, August 16, 2015

WHY MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATS ARE TERRIFIED TO DEBATE?

Cody Robert Judy -D- Candidate for U.S. President 2016 -
Only Candidate in U.S. History with Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the Defense of the U.S. Constitution's Qualification demand of 'natural born Citizen' ie born in U.S. to Citizen Parents
*See Update II  below September 21st, 2015
* SEE UPDATE BELOW: AUGUST 22,2015
WHY ARE MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AFRAID OF THE DEBATE?

Have you ever in your life seen Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates so completely terrified to debate? I mean the Republicans did trot 17 Candidates up on two debate stages August 6th three of which had never been elected, but at least had been given some coverage by the main stream media. Can that be said for the Democratic Party? The answer is "No-No-No!"

Will 2016 be turned in for the Democrats to be the new-age election where Candidates hunker down, batten down the hatches, avoid the press, avoid questions, pre-select questions, and pre-select living room audiences as Hillary Clinton has been allowed to do so far or will the Press start to "Candidately" admit this looks pretty darn rigged and crooked?

Edit Excerpt:
August 13th The Post & Email Editor-in-Chief Sharon Rondeau responding to Post run at BirtherReport of that ABC ran of little known Candidates actually had her Comment 'Removed' or 'deleted' by the Moderates of ABC which only reported a Case in the United States Supreme Court of Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Doesn't it seem odd to have a comment removed from a Newspaper editor-in-chief by ABC that simply reports a pending case in SCOTUS? This is sadly just more evidence that TRUTH is feared more than anything.

While Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates for the most part support Obama, there is one that has thought more of the Constitution then any particular Candidate. Is it a really part of an honorable Republican Platform not to have [a]ny of their mainstream Candidates having any Record at all of actually defending the U.S. Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen'? Is that something Republicans take pride in?

After Reading the Following Story entitled THE DEMOCRATS ARE TERRIFIED TO DEBATE, and being summoned in such as either a part of the "Parade of Losers" or "Kooks", I was left out of the "Crooks" account created for Hillary Clinton in the article. That is until, I clicked on the link of 'Democrat Nominees' of Course included in the story and found the most bias account I may have every read.

All tolled the 18 Democratic Candidates for President that I guess the Democrats don't want you to know about. While Republicans sported 17 Candidates in their first debate 3 of which have not been elected to office before in Trump, Fiorina, and Carson those three seem to be doing much better after the debate. Is it any surprise why the Democrats are actually afraid to let me see the light of day on a debate stage with Hillary Clinton-67, Martin O' Malley-52, and Bernie Sanders-73? I would be the only one still in my 4th Decade at 49?

Clicking on my Name- Cody Robert Judy I read the Editorialized version of Hell Associated with my name and emailed them a few corrections I do not think affords me any great latitude, bias, or their site with any bigotry.

The following Corrections might be appropriate for the Editorialized False information regarding my (Cody Robert Judy) 2016 Candidacy for President.

1) I'm not Mormon- The Church Excommunicated me in 1995 for 'apostasy'. That fact should be included because its not right to mis-represent the LDS Church with a nonfactual membership.

2) If you include that, it might give me some breathing room as the LDS Church and State are seen both punishing me. That at least combines the Church and State in a unlawful prosecution of my protest that is detailed in my book TAKING A STAND - The Conservative Independent Voice.
 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/taking-a-stand-cody-robert-judy/1021993097

3- The detail of 'Bomb threat' you included in your arm-chair quarterback position is false, unless you also include people confusing B.O.M (Book of Mormon) with the word bomb and realize the LDS Church copyrighted the whole incident. That video tape was introduced to the Judge by the A.G. , but was refused to me as the Judge , also a Mormon Bishop stated in Court 'We don't want 20/20 Barbara Walters getting it.". Releasing the video would also necessarily convicted many members of the LDS Church of brutal assaults and unnecessary, unrestrained, and violent behavior in a Church Meeting.

4) I really don't think any of this information is biased because it in fact represents the truth. If your willing to write the false narrative you did, why not try a shot at the truth? The official charge was 'aggravated burglary' the small print which says, "entering a building with the intent to commit a felony" although which felony is a mystery, and while its difficult to imagine a weapon the Mormon's use as a canonical text B.O.M, you really need to quit paying so much attention to 'Church owned newspapers' writing bomb, unless you'd like to endorse them for President?
The story of that is here:
 http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/02/fight-over-forgiveness-lds-church.html

5) Satire aside - My three Ropes Campaign Platform is here:
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/12/cody-robert-judy-presents-crjs-three.html

6) Now while your spotlighting Candidates for President, and mentioning the worst quite easily noticed, you might just for the laughs and giggles throw in the Best?

Cody Robert Judy is the ONLY candidate in U.S. History to have a bi-partisan Federal Court Record or Stand on defending the Constitution's demand or qualifications for President as a 'natural born Citizen' i.e., Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. His current case is also the longest lasting eligibility challenge in SCOTUS HISTORY and U.S. Case history. If its so 'dis-proven' why is it pending in the United States Supreme Court now? Isn't that a little risky on your part or at least 'placing a bet, gamble, or perhaps your own prophesy?

Ref: Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, NV. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61642

Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276 AND Judy v. Obama 14-9396 currently scheduled for its unprecedented 2nd Conference Sept 28th, 2015.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/14-9396.htm

You might want to read my defense of Planned Parenthood Special Report before you 'label me' strictly to the right on your last paragraph.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/a-special-report-sting-of-planned.html

I mean if you want your Site to look like a satire joke you can withhold hard facts. The problem with doing that is others began to look at your Site as just that. The choice is yours of course.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

Guess we'll see what if any changes are made?
Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a Mormon, and his religious beliefs have led him to questionable actions. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church), addressed an assembled crowd. Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter, claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy admitted to the crime and plead guilty, saying he had done it because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.]



UPDATED: AUGUST 22-2015
The following Changes were made to my introduction over at POLITICKS.ORG http://2016.democratic-candidates.org/ which we will Post along with my Considered answer found below:

[ Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. He denies that any actual bomb threat was made, explaining that he merely referred aloud to the Book of Mormon (a holy text of Mormonism, considered by that faith to be part of the Holy Bible) by phonetically pronouncing its initials, BOM, which was misunderstood to the alarm of many. Records disagree with his account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.]
MY RESPONSE: 


I want to sincerely "THANK YOU" for respectfully revising my editorialized account. I really appreciate all the time you guys put in. Without you many would not even see me as a candidate unless they headed over to the FEC. That's commendable. 

There is still two REALLY MAJOR BIG DEAL, as far as the TRUTH OF THE RECORD is concerned. The U.S. Supreme Court has a 2nd conference scheduled Sept 28th on Obama's INELIGIBILITY and if that goes forward than the 'presumption' that its been legally dealt with could really melt on you. 

So again, we are at an impasse with the account of the Record and the assumptions you have made that its settled. 

Just stating for the RECORD that Judy v. Obama et.al, 14-9396 is up for a SECOND conference Sept. 28th, 2015 is of course current and simply inclusive of the actual Court Record the U.S. Supreme Court is very much a part of TRUTH.

Your 'staunch conservatism' still labels me in the Pro-Life Category where the reference I gave you actually defending Planned Parenthood and my stand as Pro-Choice for Life disagrees in the politically correct arena. 

Why does it matter? Well, by simply stating 'staunchly conservatism' you alienate right away the BIG CHUNCK of D's who support Pro-Choice. I mean its a very big issue right now and there's not to many Candidates who have defended Planned Parenthood on the right side of conservatism right?

That is the truth if you can agree with that? Maybe you need to broaden your "label category" Just an idea? For instance, I call myself a "Conservative Independent Democrat" based on my 'conservatism towards the Constitution in my defense of the natural born Citizen clause outlining the qualifications for the office of President and Vice President, and liberal for freedom, liberty and choice.

I hope that is agreeably understood.
Cody Robert Judy

P.S. I am updating my Blog on this story, Regarding your Post and Link here.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/why-mainstream-democrats-are-terrified.html


I noticed that you put on Hillary Clinton's Introduction a Video of her Kick Off afforded on YouTube. I hope you will do the same for me? Here is the YouTube url and embedded code for your convenience. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSXjDMq_X7o



Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

UPDATED September 21st, 2015:
In your editorial regarding me I found for you some other testimonies perhaps you might take into consideration just to you know make your statement regarding my religion practices correct... I guess? It seems you have no problem condescending 'religious Faiths or practices', but ultimately it might be considered a case of libel.

You Write in your false narrative:
[(including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned]

Why would I ask Hunter to flee the building? That's so stupid to write.  There's no basis to it at all. I never asked Hunter to leave the building as you state in the synonymous 22 years ago. I asked him to read an apology statement from the Church for treating me so 'rude', which they had done. If your going to include something that happened 22 years ago, at least get it right?

These kinds of problems can be handled within a Church but when the State comes in and starts dictating what words mean in a church meeting, well then you have really lost the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution haven't you and everybody who believes in God is nuts. Maybe that's the way you want it to appear? If so, your a bigger enemy to the U.S. Constitution and a threat to it, then anyone right?

Statement 1: I was on the opposite side, about 30 rows up, but close enough to see the whole thing play out and hear his voice. I remember watching those valiant Elders of Israel dropping down behind the stands, circling, and then when some old dude rushed the podium with his hand raised, the mob pounced and old Cody Judy disappeared in the melee. It was crazy.

( The statement- some old dude rushed with his hands raised. Doesn't that sound like I was 'rushed' and assaulted?)

Statement 2:[Fascinating and sad. I had never known what happened after the initial report. Thanks for the link.
The fellow, Cody Judy, strikes me as a modern Samuel the Lamanites and his claims make a lot of sense in Mormon context - more than those of the current executive team. Plus he has the balls to back up his claim of divine authority:
"I have seen the resurrected Joseph Smith, Jesus Christ and ancient apostles. They have told me this is what I have to do," Judy said.]

( Here's a statement from an eyewitness that states very importantly within the context of the church what I was saying made sense, and was backed up within the Mormon context and by a religious understanding or context of authority.  "More so" this witness states then the current Leadership in his opinion. Samuel the Lamanite was a prophet sent to the people of ancient America to call them to repentance. They shot their bows and arrows at him but could not hit him. He delivered the message and left. Soon (32 years) in the B.O.M. (Book of Mormon) the people were indeed subject to the prophesies made by Samuel the Lamanite.)

Statement 3- [I was there, right behind the stage, about 25 rows up. Great view, saw the whole thing, beginning to end, up close. The stage was close to the back of the auditorium, so really it was one of the best views to watch it all go down. One of the girls in our group threw up. People were crying all over. When they finally got the "detonator" about 50 guys randomly came down from the stands and beat the hell out of him. An exciting evening... Glad to see someone remembers it. :)]

Now, in this context you actually see a witness to 50 guys beating the hell out of me, and that being called an 'Exciting Evening' for a Church Fireside? Can you imagine that all videotaped and held by the LDS Church Authorities, after mine you, what they say was a a threat was removed.

That's an important context. Its like after police have someone on the ground subdued, and then the punching and kicking and beating begins. That is a reprehensible and punishable by excessive force. You in your statements are glamorizing, and enjoying the harm that is being caused in your statements.

Now, of course we notice "detonator" is in quotes, because there was none. Police recovered none, there was no more a threat then you could imagine one made out of a pop-tart. The very disturbing thing is after all that was understood and known, a greater embarrassment came upon the Church Leaders. SWAT Team actually blew my scriptures up on Camera presented to the TV Channels, and they doubled down on their prosecution. Yes, its a huge embarrassment for the Church.

 Charges were escalated from misdemeanors to 1st degree felonies with no more 'evidence' no more damage discovered, and no more evidence of any weapon whatsoever, and certainly no harm to any person. These are the facts. This is why I object so much to your 'framing' the event towards newspaper articles owned by the Church or if nothing else condensing the statement to a sentence.

Since you may be big on my opinion mixed with others in your idea of fairness, How about :

Cody Robert Judy, with no juvenile or prior criminal record whatsoever, court records reveal, was framed by LDS Church Leaders cooperating with the then LDS Bishop serving as District Court Judge of the Church/State. Frames of the video tape were released to the Press. It seems the illegal union of church and state authority lied on their part in a plea-bargain to wash the whole thing down the tube with '6 months time served'. Court Records show Cody's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea three days later after the nefarious trap was understood. He served 8 years in prison with 5 Rehearings. Many attempts were made to obtain the evidence of the video tape of the Marriott Center Incident. KTVX Channel 4  with their own lawyers spent 10K to obtain the video-tape they acclimated would make LDS Church Leaders heroes if nothing was amiss. Many witnesses attesting to what is referred to as a mob of upwards of 50 beating Mr. Judy after it was understood no threat existed, while the Church refused the evidence to Mr. Judy on his Appeals. Mr. Judy refused by his Criminal Court Judge/LDS Bishop the evidence, was forced to take the LDS Presidency to Court who maintained Copyright of the Videotape, and appealed clear to the U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Case No. 96-7655. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled 'not enough people suffered [n]ot getting evidence used against them' to hear the Civil Law Case.

Is there something wrong with that statement? I mean if you have to bring it up at all?

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/2vsbsc/anyone_else_in_the_marriott_center_on_feb_7th_1993/

It is understood the Democratic National Party is in charge for Democratic Candidates on this site.
Contact Information
Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: (202) 863-8000
http://my.democrats.org/page/s/contact_issues

Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-863-8700
Fax: 202-863-8820
Email: Info@gop.com

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
www.codyjudy.us

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS








Monday, July 27, 2015

IT IS OFFICIAL! - CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2016 DECLARATION OF CANDIDACY- Democratic Party


Cody Robert Judy's Official Declaration for United States President 2016 in the Democratic Party
SPECIAL REPORT
-IT IS OFFICIAL -

CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2016 DECLARATION OF CANDIDACY
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Candidate in the Democratic Party
- - - - - - - - - 

See the LINK here:  F.E.C  CRJ DECLARATION FOR PRESIDENT also embedded at the end of this Post.
If you would like to see Cody recite this speech, it is also embedded half way into this post and Linked here Declaration for President Speech


My Friends and Countrymen, Patriots of the USA, I am humbled and honored today to OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCE my DECLARATION FOR CANDIDACY in the  2016 Election for the Office of the President of the United States of America in the Democratic Party! 

The CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW COMMITTEE, representing my Candidacy for the Office of President, was formed and mailed to the Federal Election Commission today. Though I have registered in the Democratic Party for their nomination, it is my prayer, that my Campaign will be an Ensign for all Americans who value principle over party. For there is no political party that is worth sacrificing principle over.

My Candidacy in the Democratic Party is one embedded with the hope of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy's ( JFK's ) commitment to the integrity of our sound economic prosperity, met with the commitment of a balanced budget that former President Bill Clinton achieved on our deficit. 

My Candidacy I hope will represent the National Security concerns of all Americans that our represented with the Qualifications of the President that are endowed with wisdom within our United States Constitution being understood and also enforced. 

With the energy of my soul, I am committed to upholding the ensign of the Constitution of the United States of America and revitalizing its Standards that have dilapidated with the pressures of political extravagance unnecessary for the health of our Nation. I have committed myself to this Stand regardless of political party in favor of Principle for that is where both Independents,  Democrats, and Republicans should be happy to meet together in the sound interest of a committed Union of the States. 

As the Union goes, so goes the Constitution of the United States of America. The freedom and liberty of religion, the freedom and liberty of speech and assembly, the freedom and liberty of choice, the freedom and liberty to protect our property, and the freedom to enjoy as Citizens the applications of equality and happiness that is rooted in the hearts of our children as our Creator has endowed them regardless of race, color, gender, or prior servitude abiding for peaceful existence.  

To secure these rights by a sound Declaration that we expect a commitment of excellence from our Citizens honored by an equal commitment for legal immigration that I intend to uphold and honor as Congress instructs me in executing the duties of the office, preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States of America.

I say to you today, that if I am entrusted with the Office of the President, that the expounding rights of the U.S. Constitution for our Citizens will also be upheld.  Let me say, I understand that if and when our U.S. Constitution is not upheld that the natures of evil seeking to imprison our women for their choice, imprison those who seek self defense who are equipped with capacity yet are dependent and not yet infirm, who wish to imprison those who are unique in their natures as Citizens of this Nation, shall find my Command as a reprimand and one of respect, honor, and love for those they seek to imprison. 

Tis for the living Citizens I am elected and for whom I shall secure their rights under the Constitution in harmony with our Criminal Codes. 


Let me convey to you my Platform to uphold our Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare for our elderly with new and pioneering ways to finance these obligations without the burden being passed upon future generations. Let our children grow up with the Promise of a bright future rather than being chained at the age of accountability to the ravages and yokes of debt placed upon them by a generation who could not say "No" and spent their children's inheritance too. That problem may be one we as Generation X did not ask for, but it is one that we must solve creatively with what we have.

Let me convey to you my commitment to our Allies and those Nations whose populations and commitments not only talk but walk or behave as our Friends.  Let all other Nations understand that our commitment to our borders under the umbrella of the United States Constitution is not linked to the expansion of their territory or police force and that we will not be bullied by exploits as gross and unhinged as they may be. 

Let them understand that our help to secure their problem will be paid for by their Commitment and not at the expense of our Citizens as has been plainly outlined by my Three Ropes Platform.  

With these Revolutionary Codes let me express my full faith that our commitments and obligations can be met and we can lighten the load that burdens our population and brighten the hopes of our future. We can secure, at the same time, the amazing future we all hope our Children will have towards their personal Dreams. 

If I am invited by election into your White House as President and your Commander-In-Chief, let me express my commitment to justice as well the honor of our Judicial and Legislative Branches of Government. I do not think that the Post as President is going to provide you a job, but I do think that fair trade emphasized with mutual respect will and can influence companies to enjoy the promise of the United States of America. 

It is true that we are an essential part of the Global Economy, and that we are not void of our own abilities to make and harvest and produce for our population as well as enjoy the commerce of trade with other nations with a well oiled balance of weights and measures in the interest of justice that will secure our population from unfair exposure. 

It is true that though we are a part of the Global Economy,  we are unique in our Standards of liberty and freedom some more strict, some more lenient, from other Nations. This is embedded in the fact that we are Americans.  Our duty to respect the borders and boundaries of others is a commitment to also have ours honored.  That when such are not honored our defenses must provide a counter of enforcement to those perpetrators and that this commitment seeks not only understanding but to be understood.

My energy is for the opportunity of work to be employed in the spirit of engagement and a job well done. Engaging in a good cause is primary to happiness. Over the argument of what you can't do, I am interested in what you can do. For your talents and dreams, I as your President, seek to cultivate rather than to weed out or burden in the ingenuity of your hearts desire.

May these be the reasons that I can say that I believe in you. May the TRUTH be the reasons that you say that you believe in me. May God Bless you all and uplift this work in the eyes of this Nation that a choice might be made serving you in this coming 2016 Election.     

Thank you and may God Bless America.


Sincerely your Candidate for President,
Cody Robert Judy
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16


That's just one story.. I have a lot (smile) Check out my book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS