Showing posts with label slavery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label slavery. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

FIGHTING FOR THE SOUL OF EACH CHILD – “United We Stand Divided We fall” Part III.




FIGHTING FOR THE SOUL OF EACH CHILD – “United We Stand Divided We fall”

If you missed the two other post on this issue please refer to the following two links:
Part I
Part II

“United we stand – Divided we fall” said Glenn Beck. Your damn right I don’t want you to trust your Government, he continued. A plea not to trust either party the Democrats or the Republicans sounded out of the GB microphone. I want you to find the truth yourself, and we can work this out. Glen gave a defense for Mike Huckabee whom he called a crafty progressive he wouldn't vote for as President exclaiming the differences they had, but not when it came to the ‘war on women’.

The claim has been made by so-called ‘conservatives’ that the real “war on women” was not about denying a women’s right or protection from the state, (a certain progressive agenda,) to govern her own body in a choice on whether to carry a fetus to full term delivering a child, or whether to make a decision that she was not going to carry the fetus and opt for an abortion; but that the real ‘war on women’ was thinking that a women needed any protection at all in this field or arena.

First of all, let’s agree a women is a child of God, a daughter of our Creator at any age. If you disagree with that in the beginning you already are assaulting a child. Second, a man’s belly doesn’t get big in a pregnancy. If you disagree with that you’d subscribe to the same theory from a man who made a comment on my last post put forward to me, “Don’t do drugs and don’t get an abortion”.

Gosh, how much easier is that for a man then a women, when its not his belly whose holding the fish he’s made with his deposit in her?

“You don’t shut down people and you don’t lie about people”, said Glenn Beck, but after my last two post I was called a “baby butcher” and a “vile animal”, simply for the bring forward my position of being PRO CHOICE FOR LIFE.

Indeed, it’s a third choice from being pro-life or pro-choice, and there are people who are on the pro-life side who want to throw me under the bus for being apposed to enslaving a women-child to the progressive ideal that the female body is actually not owned by any particular female individual but is actually owned by the State. Owned by the same State or ideal of any Communist Country, let’s say North Korea or what's happening in Texas right now with a husband and parents pleading for the state to let their brain dead wife/child go instead of placing her in a state of involuntary servitude against their wishes due to the fetus inside her.

Now if you’re calling yourself a ‘conservative’ and kicking people off your conservative group sites, as I was yesterday for offering a third choice, for advocating for the wisdom of a continuation of the 13th Amendment, which abolishes slavery of the human body, and standing in a denial of liberty and freedom for the female gender in ‘involuntary servitude or slavery’ prohibited by the 13th Amendment, then your fighting for a communist state as a progressive. You cannot stand for the Constitution and adopt slavery upon 60% of the population in a gender discriminatory way.

How easy it is for the wrong roads to be taken by both conservatives and liberals into strange lands?

If your content with calling me a ‘baby butcher’ and a ‘vile animal’ and representing my position as a pro-choice agenda leaving conspicuously out the “ 4-life” part, as I ‘ve represented with a big sign of the Justice Scales balanced with the words “Pro Choice 4 Life” as has happened to me the last few days with the claim that I have ‘twisted’ the Bible’s words in Genesis that gives us a clue of just how God did it, which is a respect for following God in the Bible your placing yourself in a ‘progressive fever’.

Like our Founders and Framers it is everyone’s responsibility to look for the truths we can with the moral authority foundations of our time. Liberty and Freedom were the concerns of God as he freed the Israelites out of the grips of Pharaoh’s Egyptians in the times of Moses, yet slavery raised its head right into the times of George Washington until December 6th 1865 in this land when slavery was abolished as a good idea.

Accept for a crime, involuntary servitude is seen as crime. How close to ‘involuntary servitude’ is the women in Texas right now declared ‘brain dead’ for two months with a fetus in her being incubated by the State as the husband and the parents of the women have plead her wishes when she was alive to let her go, is she not a child of God we would fight for against the State’s law to further the progress of the fetus inside her?

Update: 6pm Just heard a Federal Judge ordered the life support of the pregnant women removed today

My stand for counseling any women considering an abortion is a concern and a fight for her. I want her to make a decision that she’s going to be comfortable with the rest of her life. I don’t want her to have regrets that I as a friend might be able to help her with just bouncing ideas off of as far as options.

Politically, we have a real crisis going on with Baby Boomers weighing heavily into the retirement entitlement gates of social security, medicare, and medicaid. God knows we can use any and every fetus to mature into an healthy individual separated from the mother as a living soul to work and pay into the programs.

Obamacare is failing right now because the incentives to enroll were taken away with the penalties and prison time you get for not paying the taxes. What’s the difference your representing between Obama’s policies of ‘force’ when you advocate ‘force’ yourself of any women to maintain a pregnancy? If you can not see the war on women in that your not willing to follow the law of the Constitution any more then Obama is. Go ahead and pin the Obot pin on your head, look at yourself in the mirror and watch yourself drink the Obama kool-aid.

Women represent 60% of the total population. That’s a pretty big voting block conservatives, and what are you advocating in taking her choice away?

Well, your placing above her adult intelligence and all the years of experience she has over a fetus who hadn’t learned anything yet, and most of all your forgetting she is of the age to vote right now. Its going to take after the child is born 18 years for a new individual to mature to voting age.

Now if you think the Bible is twisted in Genesis that I referred to as a ‘moral authority’ in my last post then you certainly don’t have any respect for the ten commandments either. God’s claim on not committing ‘murder’ has, I hope we can agree on, a criteria. While it seems a paradox to qualify someone to be murdered, it was not such a strange question for God to answer in the beginning found in Genesis 2:7.

Most people who are pro-life haven’t even considered or opened their Bibles to an understanding of when ‘life’ begins found in the beginning. They do not consider Genesis and jump to Exodus with the claim on ‘Thou shalt not kill’ as the Biblical and moral authority to call women and doctors murders.

I don’t know, I know what its liked to be ‘falsely accused’ and ‘imprisoned’ for it in an unlawful prosecution. There is definitely something about it that goes against my grain and itches my ire and makes me very careful not to accuse falsely.

If anyone has actually had the experience of involuntary servitude like that, you know where I’m coming from, but it seems almost unfathomable to me to see women chanting and hoping for their sisters to be incarcerated for life or maybe even given the death penalty for murder of an innocent individual without a thought to how God actually defined life for us in the ingredients required to make a living soul.

Yes, to be qualified for murder, you have to be at the very least a living soul. Is their anyone who disagrees with that? Hopefully, our definition of murder doesn’t qualify to the living cells of cancer or disease or else the Huntsman Cancer Institute is going to be out of business.

Yes the argument can be made that cancer cells have a heart beat a brain function and are moving just like a sperm or an egg found in the ovary and after conception the combination also does as an embryo or fetus.

Now Governor Cuomo said there was no place for you here in New York if you were pro-life, pro gun or anti gay, but is there a place in America for anti-slavery for 60% of the adult population? Isn’t eliminating the choice for a women to do with her body as she wants a big step in a communist state of slavery?

One commenter posted to me, “its not just her body anymore when she’s pregnant”, excuse me? More than one spirit in the body is called possession religiously speaking? So, do you recommend an exorcism for pregnancy because that’s what an acknowledgement of more then one spirit in the body is.

A denial of Genesis ch. 2 verse 7 can certainly be seen as a twisting of truth in a “progressive position for State control’ of the body Mr. Glenn Beck. Now what did God say in the beginning on how he created man? He said, “The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground” (first) the whole body was created but man was NOT a living soul yet.

I suppose you could imagine a corpse in a casket who was dead to understand the other very necessary ingredient which is called “the spirit”; continued with Genesis ch. 2 verse 7 “and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life”.
Now with the complete body formed plus the spirit added with the breath of life, God declares in his handiwork of Genesis Ch 2. Verse 7, “and man became a living soul”.

Of course ‘leftist progressives’ you would think hate me for quoting the Bible as a moral compass, but you wouldn’t think of ‘constitutional conservatives’ hating me for it would you, but it happens just as easily when a State agenda of progressivist control is the secret agenda couching behind conservatism. We call that being a Rhino.. Republican in name only.

You know I can’t help the fact the Republicans haven’t stuck their nose in a Bible in years. That’s not my problem. I know what’s there and it rings true to me and makes sense at every funeral I’ve ever been to.

I've witnessed my own tears at a whole body being retired because the breath of life was not in it. The body of my father lying in a casket was a heart ache to me as well as my grand parents. It’s a natural respect for those we have put time in with. Anyone invested in a project that required a lot of time who has seen it fail also sees and feels a loss.

That’s about the closest thing I can come to in an understanding a mother’s love and loss at any body or portion of body in a fetus that was formed in her womb. I am a man and I have no conception or direct knowledge of what its like to have a baby or what its like to deliver a baby alive or still born.

I have known women who have had an abortion, who have had healthy children, and women who have had a still born or an unhealthy or diseased child. I have loved these women as children of God themselves and in no uncertain circumstances would I NOT fight for liberty and freedom for them even as I would an individual child who was born and who had become an individual and was a living soul.

As God grants the matured body to a spirit, that certain ingredient that is void in the corpse of one who has passed away, and the living soul separated from the mother is alive, the child’s life has begun. He or she will have the first birthday 365 days after that birth. We all acknowledge the timing of that birthday I hope, and are on the same page with that.

The first birthday by everyone does not include the 9 months of gestation which is yet another acknowledgement and witness to us of truth when it comes to deciphering when life begins. I am ever sorry for those who would call women and doctors ‘murders’ without a sincere respect for the words of the Bible and our Constitution when it comes to the definition of slavery and how vulnerable women are to involuntary servitude to the State if indeed their individual rights as children of God are not protected and considered wisely.

For those who have told me I needed to get off my high horse, get off drugs, and get the hell out of ‘conservative groups’ based upon quite honestly a change of heart I had to go through from being ‘pro-life’ to being ‘pro-choice 4 life’ a little less then three decades ago, I can tell you it is very hard and will take you to the dust of humility.
I was wrong before that change of heart happened to me. I was without knowledge and void of understanding in the greatest power in the universe God wields as a sword of truth called LOVE. A love that extends as a warm handshake or hug but does not force by the point of a gun and the slam of the prison door. That is the respect I have learned and that is extended to you to do with what you will.

However, if you will join hands with me and defend this third position of PRO-CHOICE 4 LIFE, I know also in my heart you will not be found accusing your brothers and sisters falsely and you will also be found defending life and advocating freedom and liberty to women as children of God, and of course you might just win more elections.

If God is the judge, we certainly must have an argument to defend our positions to him so I do everyday picture myself as I kneel before him in prayer and this is a subject I’d recommend to all that they do the same with. Study this out in your mind and prepare to meet your Maker with the understanding you have been given to represent.

We are celebrating with you today our 100,000 VIEWS! Yeah, we want to thank you for visiting, reading, and passing this blog on. On behalf of myself and everyone contributing and helping me along the way, we appreciate you!


I suppose it would seem odd to some to understand that I have taken a stand for the Constitution's demand that the President be a natural born citizen regardless of political party which is constitutionally conservative and at the same time advocate for the PRO-CHOICE 4 LIFE position when a pro-life position has been seen as conservative? But how can you advocate against a women's choice, advocate for the State to own her body in an involuntary servitude and call yourself a constitutional conservative when the 13th Amendment is screaming out at you "Don't go there?"

So it is, I believe my position in representing PRO CHOICE 4 LIFE is exactly that the constitutional conservative stand. I have put together a little commercial for providing more of a choice and incentive for healthcare also here and continue to fight for Congress to hear my case on the eligibility fraud Barack Obama represents and the unfairness he has represented in running for President as a walking talking violation of the Constitution's demands.

The Coasting Code-Care Act


Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand



Thursday, December 20, 2012

SCOTUS ELECTION CHALLENGE Presents: The Compromise of the Sovereignty of a Nation


SCOTUS ELECTION CHALLENGE Presents: The Compromise of the Sovereignty of a Nation


Psalms 35:30-The mouth of the righteous speaketh wisdom, and his tongue talketh of judgment. 31- The law of his God is in his heart; none of his steps shall slide.
v.39 But the salvation of the righteous is of the Lord; he is their strength in the time of trouble. 40-And the Lord shall help them, and deliver them: he shall deliver them from the wicked, and save them, because they trusted in him.

What compromise is there of slavery? What compromise is there of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution demanded only for the Offices of the President and Vice President?

Shall we allow a few States of the Union to enjoy the benefits of a little slave labor like China does? It might save us a little gas on importing things if we just compromised a little on a few selected minorities. What would be wrong with that? You know a lot of the slaves in America said they were very happy with their masters?
Twas a heavy burden that President Abraham Lincoln bore in the judgment of sacrificing 620,000 lives in the cause of the future freedom of every man in America. The United States Constitution is celebrated in the 13th Amendment with more gratitude by the minorities it protected and set free, than by the majority. Often the value of a freedom is gained by the experience of the loss of it.

The Civil War may be over but the battles continue on both sides of the coin in America. Shall the State take over the custody of a women’s body in a type of slavery, forcing her to full term of an unwanted pregnancy? Shall an anchor baby, naturalized citizen, or a duel parented citizen like Obama for instance, of the United States be given the right as a ‘natural born citizen’ to aspire to the Office of the President?

The convenient term of “discrimination” has been slapped upon America as the whip of hope and change in the cessation of the principle of our Constitution’s demand for the Office of the President. Is it the minorities who see discrimination in the wisdom of our founding fathers that only for the Office of the President and Vice President was the qualification of a “natural born citizen” demanded, exterminating any foreign allegiance by birth or by parents, as the law of nature claims: born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents?

Can a black man be a natural born citizen, born in the United States to citizen parents? Can a man from oriental decent be a natural born citizen, born in the United States to citizen parents? Can any nationality in America be born in the United States to citizen parents? Of course!

So have I sued or taken issue with every white Republican who was running or thinking of running for President who was not a “natural born citizen” i.e. John McCain, Rick Santorum, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal? Yes, but that’s not good enough?

So why the underhanded stick of discrimination by the media in SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276, or the blood splashed on my car or the foul and disrespectful language for me as a Birther and defender of our Constitution? Is it really just for Obama?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI_mjqgaDQc
CRJ'S BLOOD STAINED CAR



Well, it’s not for Blacks, or Orientals, or Latino’s or any other nationality or minority, because they can all as they are born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, qualify for the Office of the President under the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen. So we are left to understand this whole cotton-pick’n thing is really just about one man whose name is Obama or Barry Soetoro.

So what are we to gather here? People who don’t care about the “Natural Born Citizen” clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President really are fighting for a return of slavery or abolishment of the 13th Amendment? Is that it? They’d like to enslave women and a few minorities with them?

Instead of “Qualification”, anti-birthers read “Discrimination” into the Constitution? Now what would cause them to do that if their motive was pure? I don’t think “ignorance” or lack of knowledge really qualifies in this case although it might in some cases, but what I can assure in their positions is this.

That if the Office of the President is compromised by a foreign influence, which is in fact discouraged by the qualification feature of the demand for a “natural born citizen”, (which by the way excludes dual citizenship), it is not for the cause of freedom and liberty, but for the cause which besets so many other Nations ruled with tyranny and subjugation of peoples and their properties.

If it is not for the cause of freedom and liberties established in our Constitution as inalienable rights for our citizens to enjoy, then it’s formidably understood why Obama wants to increase your taxes and diminish the Constitution. Swearing an oath to the Constitution as a violation of it, makes Obama’s lie, the extent he’s willing to compromise what he promises you.

“What will the poor serfs say?”, if everything Obama’s says is a lie? What will they do if for the greater good of 300 million people, Obama extinguishes the second amendment rights over the deaths of 300?

Obama’s language, “that for the greater good something needs to be done”, should be understood to mean the opposite of the greater portion of the population in America; because in his mind the greater good extends to include the whole world not subjugated under the United States Constitution, with all of its checks and balances, but under something most would say is much more exploitative of America as a sovereign nation.

If you haven’t got the picture of what America looks like without the Constitution, or with the Constitution compromised, you have no understanding or respect for freedom and liberty, taxation without representation, or the extended promises of politicians to sell America’s future generations into bondage through the national debt with absolutely no intentions of paying it off while they are in office.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I

America No Games Just You- CRJ Election Challenge 2012 


If you want a recipe for war keep mixing. If you want a recipe for peace then take a stand for the Constitution with me on the” natural born citizenship” demand for the Office of the President with a little more enthusiasm to exactly what you’re standing up for, and what you’re taking a stand against.

If you don’t think the Constitution’s important Congress and SCOTUS, then by all means retire your positions which are founded in the document along with our principles as the Supreme law of the land. Without the Constitution there is no Congress and their sure isn’t any need for a Supreme Court of the United States respectively as a Legislative and Judicial Branch check to the Executive Branch. As the Constitution goes, so do you.







Thanks for Passing it on, supporting or contributing in any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593


LINKS USED
http://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/document.html?doc=9&title.raw=13th%20Amendment%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A%20Abolition%20of%20Slavery

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Color,Race, and Prior Servitude Amend.XV and The Parable of The Unfaithful Wife





Race,Color, and Prior Servitude U.S.C Amendment XV
Parable of the Unfaithful Wife

The mysteries of the Lord are sought out by churches and the people that attend them in literally every nation of the world. God is always revealing hidden truths, yet is at the same time the same yesterday, today, and forever. The bible is full of parables and dreams and visions as applicable today as they were the day they were given, yet the Lord still teaches in parables in everyone’s own day that they too can understand and have the experience of finding the hidden truths. Parables give us the experience of finding ourselves… treasures that are of great worth. The Lord says when you come to a child to speak in the language of the child, and so it is I would like to rehearse a modern day parable.

There was a certain women who had become disdained of her husband. She was no longer enchanted by his money, charm, or good looks. She no longer found him attractive and looked to find fault in him daily. She was a goodly women adorned with nice clothes, a clean women who kept herself moderately. She had come from a divorce and had a nice house and children who were nearly raised and it seemed she was coming to the same conclusion of this new husband as she had about the first husband.

Let’s just put a name on this second husband, so we can all simply refer to him with a name. Let’s call him… Abraham. That is a name that comes from the Bible and is pretty respected by every Christian Church. Now the Lord had told this Abraham, just the same as he had told Abraham of old that he would be a man of whom a great nation came, and also that his family would be one even as Abraham’s of old.
Abraham was a faithful man and had been very true to the Lord and had sought diligently to remain in that favor for the Lord had indeed graced him abundantly with many heavenly gifts which were a delight to him, thus he sought to please the Lord and to remain a faithful servant of his Lords’. In this Abraham’s first marriage finances had come to bare down on his young family and his wife had lost faith in him encouraged by her family who wished her back in their own lands and so she went. It pleased the Lord to bruise Abraham that he might learn wisdom and understanding and become even a man of his own heart.

Now, as I said Abraham had sought the Lord diligently to gain some understanding of why his first wife and family had been taken from him and the Lord taught him many things of which he had failed and thus Abraham learned what he was doing that was wrong as a father and husband according to the Lord’s intelligence that was somewhat different then the ‘norms’ of the society he was from. Thus Abraham was encouraged finding some meaning to his heart break in the loss of his family.
So this Abraham in my parable was encouraged, and again went out to get him a wife. This time, faithfully, he understood more of the Lord’s intelligence, and he knew that he could no longer rely on the ‘social norms’ which he had grown up with finding only heartache and loss in those customs. Our Abraham in this parable did meet a woman who he felt was a good woman and he sought diligently to court her and in every way to impress her as a suitor, and she was impressed. They became what we’d call in our modern day world ‘serious’ in their relationship.

Of course Abraham had now a difficult challenge. He had to convey to his fiancé all the Lord had taught him, for it was incumbent upon him to encourage his faithfulness to the Lord, and also his soon-to-be wife. Yet it was ever present on his mind, what had happened to his first wife, and he certainly did not want to make the same mistakes, so it was with a great deal of trembling courage that Abraham related to his finance’ all the Lord had taught him, knowing full well that these revelations could indeed also spoil his new found love that he had worked hard to impress and court.
You can imagine Abraham’s happiness when after all was revealed that this new wife accepted his proposal in marriage. Abraham took a deep breath seeing all had gone ok and his faith in the Lord was not jeopardized and the Lord had blessed him in his new romance. Abraham was, to barrow a modern phrase “tickled to death”, overjoyed, and he sought diligently to make well with his new family. Soon they were married and both of them trudged through some difficult times as the Lord sought to test this marriage.

They had wanted a child together and had sought to achieve that, though they had both had children in their earlier marriages who were near grown and out of the house but nothing happened for two years. Abraham was told in a dream that if his wife would do this and that she would become pregnant, but the this and that involved the trial of their love which the Lord had taught Abraham of which he had conveyed to wife before being married, but had never done.

Of course Abraham knew that it was not enough to worship the Lord in lip service saying, “yes yes Lord” on one hand, perhaps even on a Sunday, and then running out and saying ‘no no Lord” on the other hand, perhaps, even the six other days of the week.

So it was with great trembling again, Abraham related this to his wife who was to Abraham’s sadness not so willing to accommodate what the Lord had related. Nevertheless, Abraham was gentle with her knowing the Lord in his love had been gentle with him at times, and as their talks went on finally they were accomplished in the test the Lord had presented though it wasn’t without a few dents and bruises. This of course was familiar to Abraham, being bruised by the Lord before, but had not really been known to her so it was difficult.

She ordered a separation and thus it had been nearly 3 months since she had seen Abraham, when on occasion she accepted an invitation to go on a trip with him. Abraham grieved in his missing her and doting on his love for her, again sought to court and spoil her in any way he could manage. Though he wasn’t rich he had managed a plane ride, a wonderful dinner, and a room at a luxurious hotel. There she was receptive to him and their love was renewed. Although Abraham was delighted about their love, he sensed something was different about her but he couldn’t figure it out.

Over an ice-cream cone as the trip was nearing an end the next day, she pulled out of her purse and ultrasound picture and related she was 3 months pregnant. Yes, the Lord had indeed blessed them as they were faithful in their own, shall we call it a "test of Abraham".

Time went on and the baby was born which was a delight to both of them, but the baby had not healed her feelings all the way through and though she had seen the blessings, she sought about daily to prove her husband wrong in all of the things he loved. It was as if some competition had invigorated her and through this daily barrage of insults she did not relate to him so directly as she did her friends and her family, gradually another separation occurred.

This was a great sadness to him for he had felt for sure that the blessing and fulfilling of the Lord’s words would also seal her testimony, but it did not. Her heart was different and she was set hard and no amount of courting or attempts by him to restore his marriage worked. The child grew and was a beautiful child whom they both delighted in greatly, he had taken his first steps and they were still separated.

Abraham was weighed down in his grief, for he had sought diligently to please the Lord, but again it pleased the Lord to bruise him. She had taken off her wedding ring which had embarrassed Abraham and she was flippant in her ability without him feeling she had no need for him. She was satisfied and had no desire for him. Abraham weighed down in his grief returned his wedding ring to her jewelry box next to the one he had given her that she no longer felt any value for. He told her perhaps they should put the rings in a trust account for their baby.

One day as Abraham was weighed down in grief and standing in a line with his head bowed a girl he had known, only as an acquaintance, turned as she was in front of him in the line he was waiting in, and felt for his sorrow. She put her arms around his neck and said “Abraham, don’t be sad!”, and he acknowledged her good will towards him as a friend who simply didn’t want to see a friend sad. It was just a pure coincidence that his wife had seen this exchange and after the girl who had put her arms around Abraham and told him not to be sad left bounding off, as to Abraham probably not to be seen coincidentally again, the wife headed off towards the girl and cornered her.

She asked the girl whom she didn’t know at all, seeing her arms around her husband, “Have you ever made-love to my husband?” The girl responded, “Hundreds of times!”, and bounded off again as if not to blink an eye. She then came to her husband and said, “Haah, caught you cheating!”

Now this is the end of the parable.

There are always questions at the end of every parable to be answered. This is the process of a parable. For every church to ask and for every person to ask themselves if in this parable Abraham was actually Jesus and the women in the parable was the Church to whom is married to Jesus in similiar parables of the Bible; in what manner of cheating have you accused the Lord after his faithfulness to you?

Do you not suppose the Lord to visit other churches at all?

Hasn’t he still favored you with many blessings, yet you accuse him of cheating with others who have not truly known him either?

Why have you entreated your husband to accusations of unfaithfulness when he has so patiently and lovingly taught you faithfully all that is known to inherit his kingdom? Are you so bent on hurting him that you would cast him in to prison if he arrived?

And, what must you do now, or what will you do now you have seen as you are seen, taking your ring off? Will you choose to keep it off and find another Lord and who might that Lord be; your usurping president Obama?

What do the rings represent?

Is Obama's love of unfaithfulness towards the Constitution what you really want in a President?

Do you not desire faithfulness? You must desire faithfulness, or you certainly wouldn’t accuse anyone of being unfaithful?

What an oddity it is for people to crave faithfulness and truthfulness but vote for a lie. It is if they can’t help but inherit exactly what they are… unfaithful and liars themselves, blind yet they see.