Showing posts with label suffrage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label suffrage. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

HONOR THY FATHER- Behind the [natural born Citizen] Commandment




HONOR THY FATHER
Behind the [natural born Citizen] Commandment
How was America Forged?
Featured Editorial: The Post & Email

Honoring thy Father may be one of the most fundamental breakdowns causing America more problems than any other. In our dangerous work of digging down deep and getting to the root causes of our illness I am daunted by the task of treading where few dare to go yet the feeling that I must travel that dark abyss to find the treasure that lie amiss.

When grappling with our own weaknesses and frailties in the order of overcoming these we  must confess the world often seems outraged, insulted, put-out, overcome, bewildered, estranged, pompous, contriving, delirious, doubtful,circumvent, trivialized,bored, ignorant, rude, stupid, cynistic, and down right hateful about the idea of honoring thy father as if to ask, "What's in it for us?"

The short answer? You might live longer. Does that interest you at all?

The difficulty found in writing this is understanding the knowledge that if you have to ask for respect, you haven't earned it. If you have to ask for honor, you haven't earned it. Its that keep-silent-till-it-becomes-you-thing while everyone screws it up. Being a father is one of the most difficult jobs on the planet simply based on the sheer amount of territory you are bound to cover, the likes of which if you do not have the limited liability clause which declares you are a women is vast. You a man for God's sake! There is no excuse.

We take that on our shoulders. If you travel the vast responsibility of a father most will come up with a picture in their mind which often reflects their ideas of responsibility. More often then not, these have not yet covered even half the territory a father/male has to cover, and thus are a very poor representation or picture indeed. For Instance:

  • You may first travel the road of actually being a Dad to a child. Being there for that child, supporting, loving, caring, nurturing being there for the games, the cheers, the encouragement, the homework question, the hunting ,fishing camping, or shopping trip, and even that back to school night That's a nice Dad?
  • You might travel down the road where you think being a good Dad consisted of providing for the family for a happy life in a profession that requires dedication, discipline, courage, and bravery.  That required getting up early and coming home late all for the sake of the family who was home enjoying the rewards of a house, cars, televisions, computers, ipods, laptops, newest toys that money could buy, vacations once a year, and financing that jump start in life that would make things so much nicer like college. That's a nice dad?
  • We still haven't touched the surface or covered the fathers who went to war and were killed who didn't come home or were injured. We may have touched on the territory of those who gave some, but we haven't covered the territory of those who gave all. For those who took a stand, said no you will not cross that line, died because of their stand, and were never around because their job required being a man and a father to more then just their own personal family.
The truth is their is no father who doesn't have all that territory placed upon his shoulders here in America and the truth is often we just cannot cover all the territory that is expected of us all at the same time, all of the time. Sometimes we fail and let you down on what was more important to you at a given or particularly important time for you. It is a big job that covers a lot of territory and a lot of the territory takes you far away from where you'd like to be.

In my own job as a father I've noticed big let downs and disappointments we could say were heart breaking to those I loved and cared about most. Things that tore us apart and dissected our hearts like we were at the butcher shop. I've noticed this theme in my life in ways that no one seems to comprehend that's required time, talent, effort, and a lot of work with hardly no reward in the duty of being a son, a man, and a father all at the same time on both a macro and micro level. For instance:

  • Many at first glance would not assume taking a stand for the 'natural born Citizen' clause of our Constitution is about 'honoring thy father', until you see Candidates running for the Office of the President kicking dirt on their fathers to hide the foreign citizenship they inherited. Honoring their father's foreign citizenship would be a disqualification of their ability to run for President because you inherit a citizenship from both your father and your mother as well as the country you were born in. The requirement for the Offices of President and Vice President being [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].
    • You may have noticed Barack Obama and Ted Cruz stating their mothers were U.S. Citizens and not relaying what their father's citizenship entailed. 
    • Probably not the best campaign tool to be running for the United States President and while out campaigning bragging about your father from Kenya, Cuba, or Canada. So we have seen them simply honor their mothers and kick dust on their fathers when it was convenient or advantageous for them.
    • Its very clear to me how much time in my life over the last six and a half years has been dedicated to Honoring the Fathers, and the value of it being very underestimated by most. If you'd like to start at around 10 trillion dollars on Obama's watch that might be a ball park figure we could start at in the simple commandment to 'honor thy father' that our society has a big problem with. Realizing that has cost us more money and blessings than all the President's combined from George Washington to Bush just to start. Who's interested in money? Family? How many are on board from Wall Street? Now you start to see my point Main-street?
It might be said in years to come our entire deficit problem started by not honoring our fathers.  We did not honor Obama's father because we let his son in the White House honoring only his mother. I've long said as people argued with me that he had an American mother, that I recognized that, but I was only in the processes of honoring his father in stating he was not qualified for the Office of the President. 

Can anyone of us deny a vote for Obama was a vote dishonoring his father's inherited citizenship from Kenya? If you can stand and say you were honoring his father's citizenship in that vote you have a lot of explaining to do because it doesn't even make sense to God the Father or our U.S. Constitution said by many a President to be divinely inspired.

Have you honored those who we would call the fathers of our Nation in that vote recognizing no less than eight (8) attempts to change the qualifications in Congress from 2003 that all failed the will of the People through their representatives in Congress? What you say? Why would the 'natural born Citizen' qualification requirement need to be changed the eight attempted times since 2003, if it was not recognized in the first place as 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents'?

Many referred to as anti-birthers criticize the research and work our founding fathers did  with the written works of Emer de Vattel . Benjamin Franklin noticed his work Law of Nations: "came to us in good season, when circumstances of a rising nation make it necessary to consult to the Law of Nations", and President George Washington's checked out book Law of Nations was finally returned after 221 years.

From Vattel's 1758 Law of Nations we read in book I chapter 19,§ 212
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

In what is held as one of the premier cases of law regarding the subject, Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162  (1874), the notice of parentage was applied to citizenship in the U.S. Supreme Court. The case involved wither women had the right to vote proposing that the Constitution's meaning held women's suffrage held consistent with the original intent of the framers of the Constitution. In the discussions it had to first established if she was a Citizen. The Court rehearsed in the decision [At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in the Country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth citizens also. These were natives or natural born citizens as distinguished from aliens and foreigners.

We see today from the likes of Sen. Obama, Sen. McCain, Sen. Cruz, Sen. Rubio, and Gov. Jindal, the claims that all you need to do to be qualified for the Office of the President is be born under the 14th Amendment. How could that possibly be if the 14th Amendment was found by the U.S. Supreme Court not to be the 'authority' for a male or a female to vote necessarily? That's another tidbit of Minor v. Happersett that was found by the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus it required an Amendment to the Constitution to grant that right to all regardless of sex Amendment XIX was passed in 1920.

A similar argument is presented today before the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that really states in order to run for President as a 14th Amendment Citizen an Amendment to the Constitution must be made because as the law stands now every legislative act proposed to change the qualifications in the Congress, eight times since 2003,has failed and those running who are ineligible are hurting or damaging the Campaigns of those who are qualified under the law now.

In the case it was decided that the Constitution nor the 14th Amendment necessarily gave every person with Citizenship the right to vote. Of course women did not have the right to vote back then so the father's vote was the families vote and it was of course the fathers who went to war to fight and carve out the Nations we know today.

A CANONICAL PERSPECTIVE OF FAITHS AND RELIGIONS

 The understanding of the sons and daughters, and who received what honors, were decided long ago in what you might term our preexistence God knowing each of us very personally. Many do not know that it was the sons humility towards the Father in the preexistence that earned men or his sons the blessings of the priesthood first. In other words put a simple way, it was the blessings earned from obedience to do the chores without being told two or three times.

Of course we know God created man first. Then he took the body part - a rib, maybe Planned Parenthood sold it to Him(smile) that is not part of the record but Glenn Beck was on a rant not to long ago about spare parts so I thought I'd throw it in - God did say he took from Adam a rib which is a part, and He created a women. These he would call his sons and daughters.

The fifth Commandment of the big ten is "Honor thy Father and thy Mother".  Is there any particular reason you might suggest that it was not ladies first in this instance? Do you think God was just impolite? Wasn't a gentleman? Or maybe just didn't know what He was talking about?

In is my own belief and you may subscribe to it if you like, (or you may not), that God is very much like you are, in being able to recognize qualities some have and some don't. I heard a quote today credited to Bin Laden by a women on one of the talk shows, I think it was Rush Limbaugh's, ' if a choice is to be made between two steeds, the strong one will be the choice.' in referencing the choice of a Presidential Candidate.
Now all we have to do is figure out what strength is most favored for that choice.

Will it be arm wrestling, Indian leg wrestling, real estate net worth and income, discipline for principles, nurturing ability, defense of the Constitution, or some other quality of strength like 'how to wipe a server', or the strength to deceive like in 'crediting a video tape to promote hostilities towards Americans'? Does America need a good quarterback or do we need good receivers to catch and follow the plays the quarterback is calling and throwing?

Honor Thy Father- what is the reward? Well, it is most closely associated with making your days longer upon the earth. Does a long life interest anyone? Honor thy father and thy mother that thy days may be long in the land that the Lord thy God giveth thee. Exodus 20:12 

I jest if you teach your kids not to honor their father and their mother, your kids will grow up and think that you are pretty much a burden. Perhaps they will come to realize after 50 you know longer are a contributor to the house hold and make a law to free up entitlements in social security, medicare, and medicare with your death. Their kids might also decide that its age 40 and their kids age 30 that parents need to be terminated. So eventually what I'm saying is that the commandment to Honor your father and your mother are actually life-sustaining to you.

Without that honor, things deteriorate and dilapidate very quickly.Honoring is like putting a fresh coat of paint on to enjoy for a whole generation and it gets passed down very nicely so everyone enjoys a new paint job.

Of course there are lots of different ways to honor our Fathers, which is what this article is about. It becomes easier to honor mothers when we do honor our fathers. This might have been a clue in mentioning the fathers first in the commandment. "What if your father doesn't deserve any honor?" The same question might be introspect-fully asked, "What if you do not deserve to be here in the first place?"

Life is always worth honoring in the minutest most simple and basic ways. If you can appreciate yourself in one single way, if its nothing more then that you had the courage to wake up another day, then you can honor your father also in very simple ways.

In my own personal life I have noticed many dishonors and disrespects that I haven't said to much about, but that I do feel. Contemplating them I wonder if they are better left unspoken or will that lead to my own contribution to dishonoring the fathers as an accomplice of the narrative?

You know I have been through three divorces and I do not consider them honorable. I consider them tragedies of the weaknesses of the women who filed. Weaknesses of patience, understanding, wisdom, courage, discipline, truth, and extravagance.We all go through trials to make our weaknesses strengths and of course I have endured my own.

As the women in my life whom I've had children with have not honored me in many ways, so the witness has been the example to the children. How do we not see the road of a 50% divorce rate not being a good road in our society as far as creating a disaster of children who will dishonor your very existence and would see you better off dead then alive? The majority of divorces are in fact filed by women. How will children of the next generations survive as parents with little regard to 'honor' pass such convictions on to the children?

The States' Laws of Divorce favored women for many years, and do favor women now a great deal in property settlements and custody. In such they also dishonor fathers. As an example whole inheritances are lost to the children through the losses of valuable property to the mother that are eventually unsustainable to her. I've lost three nice houses and properties in my life none of which are now available to hand down to my children as an example of what I'm talking about. All of these properties were sustainable without a divorce. Do the children understand that when they are young?

Heaven's no,.. the kids are in lala land. Do the Courts see anything wrong with dividing and wiping out what the children might have inherited? No. All they see is equality, but man was created first. God didn't create man and women at the same time. Its just a fact we are all living with that is tied back directly to dishonoring the fathers.

Of course there are millions of varying circumstances in divorce I'm simply bringing one aspect to attention. In general however, our national debt, welfare and entitlement lines do not speak well of us as the list of dependents upon the government is growing and the list of contributors is shrinking. These are facts undisputed. How are these problems related to dis honoring the fathers?

In my own cases of children the mother received the major custody value of the children even though the home would be lost eventually they received in property settlement, or even if they left the state entirely. Schools have endeavored to honor that 'major Custody' court resolve as an excuse to dis-honor the father.

As an example of this my son's Elementary school class teacher, principal, student service directer, and Superintendent have all called and written to me in a battle royal, they refuse to call my son by his first name in school all because in Court my ex-wife was granted to be the major custody holder and whatever she tells them to call our son, is what they presume to follow. Well, my ex has called my son by his middle name rather than his first. Its been that way for six years but I called him by his first name.

The Schools have no honor for the fathers. They register the kids by their names on the birth certificate but refuse any direction to adhere to the birth certificate name when calling upon and addressing my son. I'm hurt by that. I've had a 40/60 split and watched my son every single day since he was six months old from Tues-Friday 7am to 4-6pm while she worked. I put in a lot of time and she goes in and advocates his middle name she addresses him by and doesn't represent me and will not advocate to them to call my son by his first name which I have always address him by or by a compromise of both his first and middle.

Its a dis honor to the fathers. My son is learning that the School is a place where Dad is put aside and Mothers are honored. He knows he will not be a mother in his life, but that someday he to will be a Dad and the same problem will come to him. He will be dis-honored.

THE CYCLES SWIRLING AFFECTING FATHERS AND CHILDREN IN AMERICA

This is a cycle that is contrary to the natural order of God and from the biggest Macro Circles imaginable down to the littlest Micro Circles it is swirling and we have got to get a handle on it or we are going to put ourselves right out of business. I have no doubt that I suffer the biggest problems in our society and the reason I do is so that we can together find solutions. These are our challenges.

When the problems of the head meet the tail and began to devour itself, when does the head decide its not a good deal to eat the tail because when you do you destroy yourself?

How will the women fair who find themselves with no defenders in their households against an invading army who have no sympathy for their feminism? Will they think about their fathers as they are left on the streets? Will they wonder about preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution when they are raped and watch their children killed? What mercy what honor will they be impressed with in witnessing that horror based on their dis-honoring the fathers?

Its a grim picture to contemplate, but one which does not seem to far distant unless we somehow..someway get back to honoring our fathers in the the micro and macro circles that sustain life, preserve our lives and sustain our families very existence that so many take for granted now and think do not matter.

I encourage young people and old people to look to appreciating one another. Look to honoring your parents even as you would like to be honored someday by your children. When I was a young 14 year old boy I had a blessing in which I was told to honor my father and mother that my days might be long upon the earth. I have looked for ways to do that throughout my life with my own parents in the very best ways I could think of loving both my parents.

I have and  am engaged in a great big civil court fights going clear to the United States Supreme Court involving our U.S. Constitution in the ultimate actions that consisted of simply " Honoring Thy Father". This has subjected and required me to endure insults, expletives, threats and acts of violence that threatened even my life and have taken me away from my own family for the favors of all families in the interest of our liberties and freedoms in this Nation.

As the core of our Constitution exist in the qualifications of the Office of the President that wields the enforcing or executive action of our entire Government, or lack there of in what is called deferred prosecution or even prosecutorial discretion, we see the theme of a lack of respect and a dis-honor to our fathers in both the failures to prosecute and to uphold preserve, protect, and defend our own Constitution.

There was just an article featured from my resident state of Utah in the Salt Lake Tribune entitled 'Some Mormons stocking up amidst fears that doomsday could come this month"  In the article the following paragraph was noticed :

[Her purpose in speaking out, Rowe told interviewer Kate Dalley, was "to wake more of us up. ... We need each other as we unify in righteousness and continue to build a righteous army. When we need to defend the [U.S.] Constitution, we will be ready.]

I suppose my considered answer is why doesn't she think the Constitution needs to be stood up for Today and where are they in this fight? They are still waiting or something? Why is a military answer not considered a last resort while the Civil Fight in Court is ignored?  Its just amazing to me to be in such a big fight and have none of these people helping at all. I don't just speak of the lack of help by the Mormons to uphold the Constitution in this fight to 'Honor Thy Father', but to all Christian Religions also who believe that this is a very important commandment from God.

Enjoy this video I made with fathers great and small included: FATHERS TRIBUTE



THE GREATEST SACRIFICE GIVING ALL - HOW WAS AMERICA FORGED

Within the Presidential Race there are questions that D- Mrs. Clinton and R-Mrs. Fiorina will never be asked that other Candidates who are male might be required to toe the line to. How many years have you been registered for the draft? Conscription is the compulsory enlistment of people into the national service, most often military service. On Debate.org the question is asked, "Why do Males have to register for the draft and Females are not required in the equal opportunity environment? Of course we haven't answered equal pay either, but often it is seen that women do want equal rights and to get them an equal sacrifice would necessarily seem required.

How many daughters of America have been drafted in our History and not come home because they were killed? Of course if there is a ratio of those forging America out on the battlefields of males to females, we understand the males have heavily been sacrificed that our Nation might live. As long as the boys decorate the halls and walls of war, how is equality seen? No one wants to talk about that on the debate stage, but equal pay is fair game and we do have women who want to be President never subjects to a draft that has oft times been used to forge this nation.

 I have been the subject of a draft for 31 years. Why haven't the women got together and made the drafting of all our daughters as well as our sons applicable? My considered answer is that there are more women with more sense in their head then we are lead to believe with the feminist crowd. If that's not true, then the reason is because they were all draft dodgers hiding behind the lines we men put up for them, but now they want to be President.

 At any time, America had my name for a draft. Incidentally if you wanna know, Barack Obama's draft registration unfortunately has a faulty dated year stamp on it and he is said to have had a pass port that allowed him to travel to Pakistan which would mean he could not have had an American passport because at the time he traveled to Pakistan, Americans could not travel there. This then would make his draft dodging necessary because he couldn't register for the draft if he was not an American Citizen. In fact over 11 Million Americans have witnessed the investigation of the Cold Case Posse that has held Obama's draft registration is indeed a fabricated or forged document.

Let us hope and pray that Justice has not gone so far down the tube in America that we cannot at the very least hold accountable those running for President to the qualifications of the Office of the President found in our Constitution and that 'natural born Citizen' means Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - honoring both the father and mother equally rather then just the mothers citizenship. We hope that will be the conclusion of the Untied States Supreme Court in the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for a second Conference September 28th, 2015.

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

























Thursday, April 10, 2014

The Mistake of the Pro-Choicer' with Birthers'- Thou Shalt Not Shoot Thine Own Defense


The Mistake of the Pro-Choice with Birthers- Thou shalt not shoot Thy Defense.


Looking through the list of the 10 prominently noticed women InTheCapital as very powerful women in Washington DC, the thought occurred to me that it looked like there were many who would consider themselves pro-choice on the abortion issue.

Many of these women I thought have made a liberal life in progressivism based in an ideology of equal rights for men and women, or fairness. They have made a choice in life to be advocates for moving women ahead in an ideal they imagined of equality, and who wouldn’t say that movement hasn’t indeed pushed forward in the last 200 years a long ways?

As a former domestic prisoner of war in an unconstitutional unlawful prosecution, I can identify very clearly what it’s like to lose choices and be forcibly taken away as a prisoner without any rights in America. This is the driving centrifugal force that terrifies women when it comes to not being able to make a choice with what they can and cannot do with their body.

Very strict pro-lifers would not blink an eye to see women shackled and cuffed in a strip cell spread eagle in the new government affordable healthcare under a Doctor’s order providing an environment for harvesting the baby she was carrying rather than giving her a choice to abort. They would look at that as mercy upon the un-born and a protection of innocence just as they recently decried a crematorium loaded up with the unborn as the furnace helping to heat a hospital.

We are left with the horrorible images of burning baby flesh no doubt with those still alive a little bit providing heat for a place where care was intended that had morphed into savagery. On the other extreme we see a Government Enforced harvesting line of women with pregnant bellies in shackles and chains behind the bars of a prison cell stripped of their clothing and any decency to prevent their selves from hanging and thus inflicting injury to the developing fetus in the womb.

It’s almost difficult to decipher what side is more horrible because each side intends to inflict the grossest and most shocking picture of human decency and care upon the other side to gain supporters for the lobby in Congress and the Courts.

Within the confines of both however are the principles of the United States Constitution advocating a protection of life and also advocating women’s rights and justice for all. On the issue of rights to life and free choice I’ve written extensively here, but that is not what I’m focused on in this article.

From those two very distinct and organized groups the question arises who can do without the United States Constitution and survive? My considered answer is neither can; however, this articles features commentary on how those who have advocated for ‘free choice’ are with their actions blindly digging a pit for themselves with the United States Constitution in it from which neither will survive.

For just a moment think of “Equal Treatment of the genders”. Without the United States Constitution women still would not be voting, would still not have a say in the Government, and the opportunities the USA provides women found in the 21st Century certainly would not be seen. Women would unquestionably be regulated back to a primitive form of governance and the might-is-right standard where husbands had every right to break their jaw in order to shut them up because they were physically stronger.

Of course the gym and self defense classes have helped that in today’s modern world, not to mention the 2nd Amendment, but don’t forget we’re discussing a world without the Constitution and women certainly wouldn’t have the keys to the gun chest or be allowed to own guns in an unconstitutional America. Trust my opinion and experience on this ladies, as a prisoner you do not get your hands on a nice callipered weapon with sites that are dialed in for target practice, and we have seen there is nothing like the “Law” to incarcerate whole segments of society- think pre-suffrage.

So the real question is why women fighting for equality under the law, pro choice, equal pay and all that, would actually be fighting against Birthers unless they were so stupid that they see an unqualified person in the White House whose a walking talking violation of the Constitution who was what.. somehow going to magically change when it came to women’s rights? Why are women who are pro-choice who require the Constitution as a defense fighting against "Birthers" whose goal is to maintain the Constitution? It doesn't make any sense.

It’s very difficult for me to imagine anyone not seeing this advocating pro-choice for women who are so unaware of the grave they are in fact digging for themselves, by voting for a man who has no problem dismantling the United States Constitution line by line, precept upon precept, here a little and there a little with the audacity to do so in such boldness that he would hand out a fabricated birth certificate, employ someone else’s social security number as his, and work to concoct a phony draft registration as his.

Does that sound like a man who is going to put women anywhere near equal or let the light of day be seen on the rights of the Constitution relied upon and held up by women as a standard and protection of individual rights and freedoms?

Yet here we are in all the glory of these beautiful news anchors deriding Birthers as what- Crazy, Extreme-Right wing-Dangerous-Whacky-Tea Party Fundamentalist? Do you notice what we are never called though? We Birthers are never called “Unconstitutional” and the reason for that is there is no foundation for it.

Of course that would give you the opinion that anyone for the Constitution was indeed labeled by the Obama Administration as what? Well in Obama’s words we are ‘side shows and carnival barkers’. Women should take notice and realize this is not a statement about Birthers; it’s a blanket statement about them.

That’s what I think about when I see very wealthy, independent women enjoying their life of luxury and power not contributing a dime to a Birthers campaign, confident that their world will never change. It just makes so little sense that someone could easily label it senseless insanity because it flies in the face of the Constitution’s protections.

To continue in that forum really puts every woman who is pro-choice and actually voted for Obama or continues to support Obama in the really stupid category. I mean that not as a derogatory statement but as a description that fits because ignorance implies a lack of knowledge and Obama most certainly has provided all the evidence himself to understand he received a Kenyan citizenship from his father and an Indonesian citizenship from the formal adoption of his step father and let’s just make it simply – dual Citizenship is prohibited in the Office of the President. You don’t need a sheriff’s report to really understand this.

Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Possee review here
This is a must watch video!


Obama’s fraud, forgery, and deceit as a qualified candidate for the Office of the President is well known and understood to be tainted by his own record and admission. A decision or choice that women have made to shoot themselves in the foot with the precision of a targeted group profiled by Obama is astounding!

The choice has always been right there in front of them forwarded to them in every single press release and document I have sent out with the plea for their support. I can actually tell you that there are less than a half a dozen women who have supported me in any campaign with a total amount combined of less than $100 dollars. I am here to tell you the past is the past but I need your help and if we don't get our butts in gear, and start working together more, its going to be disaster especially for people who need the help the most.

Now for a candidate who has taken the heat for the Constitution as I have in a non-partisan non-racist stand against McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012, the most powerful office in the United States of America which has been usurped, was their another candidate you thought more of who has stood up for your rights?

In the pure spectrum of the political arena, please picture with me all of the women who have called me as a candidate ‘lame’ or ‘crazy’ for standing up for the Constitution at the judgment bar of whatever or whoever you deem your divinity in a righteous judgment court of law or bar, and please tell me how far your rich reward in heaven is going to be with the contemptuous and paltry $100 dollars you have on record as a lobby for the Constitution of the United States of America against the most nefarious evil intentions against it?

There is very little help coming and so many people being affected by Obama. I keep wondering if people think we can coast through the Obama administration years without paying the piper of the decisions that so many have made to just flat out abandon the U.S. Constitution?

While you might not like my directness and focus upon your vote and contribution for the defense of the Constitution I’m left with so little choice myself because indeed you have been given so much. I’m sure you have heard where much is given much is required? God knows I know that’s the truth, I’m writing this aren’t I? I have to say this is one of the hardest articles I've ever had to write. I'm not sure its very inspiring to critizise, complain, and in many people's eyes judge people for the decisions they have made that I think have been a mistake and a big one.

I want to convey to you so we all agree that if you believe in God in Heaven, the Lord our Creator mentioned in both the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States purported to be the Supreme Law of the Land to this day by Courts of law, do you think it is very difficult for him not to take notice of this and absolutely feel his disappointment? If you don’t care, I suppose there is nothing left to talk about.

While it might appear to be very aggrandizing of me in your opinion or diagnosis for that matter if you’re so qualified to make such, please understand my stand for the Constitution is to lift others up not tear them down. The usurpation of any office has at the root of it the opposite aim, by the very nature of the intention. Don’t you understand that when it comes to Obama in the Office of the President?

Perhaps more and more people are recognizing these facts, but directing the very hurt feelings and anger in a positive way is a huge challenge. That's why it is my goal to help and teach people how important the U.S. Constitutiton is to them on a daily basis. Its not just when you walk in to court and start referring statutues and case law. In fact before you every get to court there has to have been some kind of major break down.

Therefore I ask that you look at the facts. If I were not the only candidate for president in the United States in both genders, who sued both McCain and Obama in the time period from 2008 to 2012 in the defense of the natural born citizen qualification of the Constitution in a non-partisan non-racist record I might agree with you that I had no business in the political arena, but since I am, I’m also responsible for it. In that responsibility, I have to tell people where we are lacking, where the holes are in the line of defense and how they can help and how we need the help.

It is my hope that you will ask yourself in order to answer the questions of why you should listen to me, “How could one man in America have been so inspired to do that in the political arena of our time?” It is also my hope that you will understand that it is my testimony that I have followed God’s incredible intelligence to me in the greatest sentiment of humility you can imagine and I know a lot of people will resent the hell out of that just because I give credit to God and don't take it myself. They will slam the door in my face, refuse to tell my story, these are just some of the things I've experienced; but it’s the truth, and believe it or not it is the truth that will set us free.

You really must weigh this in the balance yourself with yet one other question: How much power does the person in the White House have, over your decisions every day and certainly over your posterity in future generations? Hint: 1/5 the economy in Obamacare,7 Trillion in 5 years, and 24 scandals and counting not to mention what appears to be the diliberate tank of dollar, all so Obama could buy a pass on his eligibility with stimulus takers.I keep thinking if people understand that they will insist the Constitution is followed in the qualifications demanded for the Office of the President.

If you don’t think you’re in deep, keep your mouth shut and don’t make a peep, or basically in other words, “continue as you are”,otherwise start hollaring to your Congressmen and keep it up. (smile) This is like a bad business deal that just keeps going bad and everyone keeps doubling down, pretty soon there's just not going to be a double down.

There are not many children born without a women or a mother. Those who do have children who are concerned for their nurturing must understand in some degree the love the Lord in Heaven has, and his deep concern about this total abandonment of the greatest defense for women and his children’s future here in the USA. Without the United States Constitution what are you recommending for yourself and your posterity may I ask you to consider?

So, as mothers and women of the United States of America, for whatever cause and affect you may feel worthy of; meaning, for whatever cause you have contributed the least towards that was your greatest defense i.e. The U.S. Constitution, let there be an understanding that God’s judgment is also qualified in the affect you feel from that coming upon you in pure righteousness in the political arena or world that you live in.

That’s fair right, not to be confused with ‘far right’? If you don’t think there’s anything else you can do or change, as they say let your actions ride for whatever or wherever you’re riding. Because if you continue riding as you are for the destination your headed, there is no doubt in mind you will get there, and by God it won’t be me whose surprised , but you when you find out where exactly you have arrived.

I myself continue to be an advocate for you and the Constitution understanding even in your stupidity and malcontent for the Constitution in your support for Obama, that I don’t think you’ll like it very much in a world without that document and the principles there in. I appeal to you with all sincerity to change, and change quickly for the blanket of your protection is very close to being put away by our Father In Heaven and I say that with the same inspiration that you might say inspired me to the action against McCain and Obama in a court of law.

I don’t care what ‘religion’ you are or not religion you are. This is the political world that you will find under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. When the blanket is removed you may find yourself the very first to suffer quite horribly in the future you helped create.

In my opinion I wouldn’t say it’s a man’s world with 60% of the voting population that are women. I think women can put into office anyone they want. In my opinion I’ve pretty much been wiped out by women and I’d say God could have just as easily inspired a women running for President to do what I have, but he didn’t and the why is the question I suppose your free to ask him yourself.

The Constitution is our strongest suit, both men and women, regardless of political party. This banner we all come under and find protections or hope for protections, must be defended in a much stronger way. If that is abandoned as it has been and the Constitution is replaced with chaos, what law will be left for women to run to?

Perhaps the most important question of our time is now asking your women leaders of the day if they are Birthers? That will tell you very quickly where they are headed tomorrow advocating for the Constitution or chaos. Why is this so important?

From a dear friend of mine I thought these words of hers were extremely poingnant:[The recent passing of my [her] dear friend has left me with these questions, "How can I love people more? Inspire them to see their impact on everyone around them? And most importantly show them their brilliance?" And while I cannot take away another's agency to choose for themselves, I can commit today to encourage others to see life from my perspective; Life is beautiful and worth living, our relationships are the most important thing in the world and above and beyond it all, WE ARE ALL ENOUGH.]

There is so much sense in understanding the word "love" and how it affects people. Considering her question to us all: "How can I love people more?" In the understanding of The United States of America defending the Constitution actually is a good way to love everyone much more and God sure has loved us to give it to us in the pledge of our allegiance to the Republic for which we stand, one Nation, Under God, with Liberty and Justice for all. That's a lot of love for everyone here today, a lot of respect and honor for those who are not with us now, and indeed a honorable road for us to pave for the futures generations of tomorrow.

Cody Robert Judy

P.S.
Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America Women?



Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America?

I pledge of allegiance to the flag – Of the United States of America – and to the Republic for which it stands- One Nation – Under God – Indivisible with liberty – And Justice for all.

Our Pledge of allegiance ends with a profound statement encompassing every American with justice. So what does it tell you about what’s happening to justice in America when a simple definition of a ‘natural born citizen’- ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’- has thus far been hi-jacked by the occupant of the White House as well as the Courts?

Well, I’ve run for President in 2008, and 2012, and have begun 2016 and I tell you justice has thus far escaped me as an American in the demand that only a ‘natural born citizen’ could qualify according to the Constitution Article II Section 1,Clause 5 for the office of President.

The problem with that, and the reason you should be concerned, is that justice has escaped you also. Justice for you has been jacked for quite some time.

On January 4th, 2013 the United States Supreme Court meets in conference to discuss a couple of things regarding my case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. Among them the ripeness of the case, the competitive standing of the petitioner (me), and the reconsideration ultimately that the Courts can’t have it both ways as far as the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President.

Justice can’t demand the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification for the office of the President be upheld in denying a ‘naturalized citizen’ the ability to run for President as the case in a Sept.28, 2012 ruling in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Hassan v. F.E.C;11-2189, by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, in principled terms concurring that the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5 had not been “trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as was the case by an Administrative Court ruling in Judy v. Obama, the subsequent Superior Court, and Georgia Supreme Court holding that the 14th Amendment did in fact over-rule the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5.

There could not be a plainer simpler determination to see in the presumption that justice has been jacked.

It seems that just as soon as the name Barack Obama is not included in the action before the Court that all of a sudden the Court upholds the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification as a standard that demands no foreign influence in the office by birth or parents. This is how it was suppose to be as the unique demand for’ natural born citizen’ only exists for the President and Vice President Office and is not a part of the qualifications for the Offices for House of Representatives or U.S. Senate.

The Constitution itself in the clause lays bare the exception to a ‘natural born citizen’ occupying the Office of the President as it declares that ‘a citizen’ is able to occupy the office if the person was not a ‘natural born citizen’ prior to the signing of the Constitution.

The Judicial Branch of our Government has long been held as the Branch most dedicated to upholding justice for individuals. The Courts is where we go when we have been wronged rather than the gun cabinet as was so often frequented in the Wild West. We are a nation of laws and our Constitution has long been held the factor that made the United States ‘indivisible’ in our pledge of allegiance as we uphold that as the Supreme Law of the Land.

Of course States could vary on many issues, but upon the United States Constitution every State and every Political Party for that matter came together lest civil war unfurl its banners with death and mayhem being carried out dividing us in our own backyards as a Republic.

Ask yourself if you’re questioning that document if you’d appreciate a few States being allowed to incorporate slavery again? Women’s suffrage? 2nd Amendment Right to bare arms? Or even prohibition?

Hollywood might engage support in terminating weapons meant to throw off a repressive Government clearly out of step with the Supreme Law of the land, however, just as soon as you remove the ability for them to use weapons in the movies, or curtail free speech in a Hollywood Drama in anyway including Broke Back Mountain, you might see Hollywood reaching for and supporting the 2nd Amendment very quickly with an aim that is very sharp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B1EObqM9Z0s



Yes, it’s just a matter of liberty and freedom when it really comes down to it that is very important to all of us. This freedom and liberty has unleashed Hollywood to spectacular heights in the eye of the world but those heights also mean that the fall can be a painful one if our Constitution is not upheld.

I’m sure they get it and don’t need a lecture from me, accept sometimes people think they can have it both ways. In the past we have done a pretty good job in maintaining balance in America which is not easy. You've got to want it badly. The forces against women especially are continually urging for repression and the defense is continually assaulted.

That’s why it pains me so bad to see especially women standing against the United States Constitution in the demand for a “natural born citizen” in the Office of the President. I mean you want to talk about slavery again, putting a veil over your face, losing your right to vote as a citizen, and a return to the dark ages, those who voted for Obama seem to have no clear idea of exactly what a termination of the Constitution means to them personally or the effect upon our Constitution through the office of the President.

Yes, I have long been denied justice in my runs for President. I have long been denied a fair race. Obama has seen himself as an exception to the rule of law. Many courts have seen that and concurred. Obama’s lie about being a ‘natural born citizen’ is probably only surmounted by his lie to women that he does not want to see them stripped of their citizenship.

If actions speak louder than words, and they do, it is clear or should be clear, that not holding up the Constitution in the demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ in the office of the President is just as good as wiping away a women’s citizenship completely. There is no better way to get the task done.

You don’t think he’d do it? Well, you must be very good at lying to yourself, and to others, to have this lie perpetrated against you. Obama is a perpetrator in your house- the same house that has protected women’s rights in the United States Constitution.

Here’s the question: How long are you willing to wait for justice to roll around to hearing your cry again? How long are you comfortable weeping? 2008-2012-2016, have you ever thought about how many years it will take you to gain justice again for your plight if the Constitution is null and void?

And the worst part of it? It was done by your own hand…your own vote.

I am the biggest advocate for women’s rights you have at your disposal. I have been serving you in all the years that I have been denied justice in this fight to defend the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President. I pray to God that my suffering won’t translate into your suffering, because once that takes place I cannot guarantee that you won’t be denied justice just the same as I have been denied justice for as many years and that is pain I don’t want to see you experience…again.

Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included