FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email
Is the Democratic Party Worth Saving?
Solutions to the problems the Democratic Party faces may be so far removed from the Democratic Party Establishment that they crash through left field and knock themselves out crashing through the left field boundary wall of the United States of America political ball field. Identity Politics has paralyzed them to the point where Individuals have replaced Individual Rights and the gap left between their leaders and the Country in understanding that is unrecognizable.
What is the classic Identity Politics Playbook? I'm black so I can win! I'm brown so I can win! Wait, I'm yellow so I can win! No, I'm female so I can win! I'm a transsexual so I can win! I'm gay so I can win!
It's the complete opposite of being a part of the United States of America and having good ideas for Justice for ALL and if you take a look around Democrats you have lost over 1,000 Races since the King of Identity Politics usurped the U.S. Presidency because he was black and could win. The long-term affect of Identity Politics is akin to a sugar high that lifts one up quick and drops you down very low just as fast.
This is what the Democratic Party has bought in to with "The first black President who was actually half white"; The first "Don't you want a women for President?", Candidate who has lost twice now. It is just not a unlimited magic-hat trick that is going to make the Democratic Party great again and when an Individual replaces Individual Rights the emphasis is on Tyranny of ONE and not on Civil Rights that has the Power of ALL.
An interesting experiment took place that emphasis the point brillantly at New York University (NYU).
Eileen Reynolds
What was purposed was essentially what I would call a critique on WISDOM and the fact that regardless of gender, race, color, or any thing else, wisdom is noticed no matter whose mouth it is coming out of. Of course they conducted the experiment with the emphasis on gender and what they thought would be a slam dunk for Identity Politics.
If Trump's words were replaced by Hillary's words, and if Hillary's words were replaced with Trump's words, would the verdict of the election have been the same? You could almost sense they hoped the verdict would not be the same and that if Hillary spoke Trump's words she would NOT have won proving that a women has a proverbial character flaw which makes her a victim, and thus warrants a greater tipping of the scales for justice rooted in wisdom and understanding.
Just the opposite happened. The Trump Actress who spoke Hillary's Lines in the debate, was disliked more. The Hillary Clinton Actor who spoke Trump's lines was liked more.
People across the board were surprised that their expectations about what they were going to experience were upended.”
We both thought that the inversion would confirm our liberal assumption—that no one would have accepted Trump’s behavior from a woman, and that the male Clinton would seem like the much stronger candidate. But we kept checking in with each other and realized that this disruption—a major change in perception—was happening. I had an unsettled feeling the whole way through.
The simplicity of Trump’s message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman—that was a theme. One person said, “I’m just so struck by how precise Trump’s technique is.” Another—a musical theater composer, actually—said that Trump created “hummable lyrics,” while Clinton talked a lot, and everything she was was true and factual, but there was no “hook” to it.
What this proves is that Hillary Clinton could have easily won the Election if she was not so intensified on anti-American, and divisive Identity Politics. Hillary Clinton actually succeeded in turning off half the Country and Donald Trump succeeded in communicating to the portion he needed for the win because he was speaking to more people about individual rights as U.S. Citizens. Clinton was polluting and diluting her message with the World of Citizens, but the world doesn't vote in American Elections.
That is a complete and utter incrimination against the Democratic Party as far as I am concerned. To have lost the debate on Civil Rights is inexcusable! And furthermore, to not get it? Why that's just plain stupid!
Why?
Well, picture Hillary Clinton walking around looking at her pink pussy hat all the time asking for your vote? Picture Barack Obama walking around all the time looking at his skin asking for the your vote? It might work once, but it's a short term high because America is rooted in wisdom and understanding. That has won the Civil War. It may have appeared blacks were free, but whites were freed too. No one want's to be a slave and many people seem to forget that there were white slaves and black Slave Masters?
Individual Rights are calculable only to the greatest number of people affected. If you calculate the black freedom as only a fight were blacks are involved, you will not get one white person fighting for the freedom. That is understanding Freedom and Liberty and Justice for all. [Understanding].. think about that word.
This is why I firmly believe the only way the Democratic Party will ever return to it's greatness in America is if Obama/Clinton Identity Politics is thrown under the bus and squarely run-over. But I'm not sure the Democratic Party has the "Understanding & Wisdom" to actually conceive that is what needs to happen, or to understand that their hope of "Identity Politics" was a sugar high - great for the 15 second commercial and terribly exposed in an hour long debate.
I have long defended many things Democrats have stood up for such as equal rights for all Citizens. When Republicans refused to remove "Marriage" from State Government leaving it to the Churches, in favor of "Partnership" in State Tax Considerations, under equal protections of Citizens they trampled "Marriage" if it was trampled in allowing Same Sex Marriage in equal protection of rights to Citizens.
Democrats didn't do that; Republicans were bent on discrimination against Citizens when it's clear both female and male can vote.
When it comes to Pro-Choice and Pro-Life, I cognitively recognize children do not vote until the are enfranchised at age 18. Prior to that they are under a dictatorship called type of government in the household with their Parents as responsible adults for their Vote. Life in the understanding of a Soul has it's creation in the separation and its individuality which then in extinguishment constitutes murder. The State confining a Citizen's Body for 9 months without a committed crime is an abuse,nor is a man committed to prison for spilling his seed for the same period or a women for her period and flushing her eggs down the toilet.
That a body in a casket of a man who died of natural causes looks an awful lot like a human without the spirit, needed to create the Soul constituting a [Person], the same way a 8-9 month old fetus looks whose body never received the Spirit to make up the Soul, but we have an awful lot of people declaring a vicious murder has taken place, in lieu of God's Mercy, (and in my believe Promise to every Spirit to inherit a body) as if God can't make another body for that Spirit?
Democrats were mostly Pro-Choice, and Republicans Pro-Life, I chose to be Pro-Choice-for-Life taking to heart the way in which God created man in the distinct steps.
Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
a- Body created first b. Then the spirit entered the lifeless body c. Soul created d. body + spirit = Soul
The delusion of Democrats however into the delirium of Identity Politics has proven itself 1,000 times over to be a losing strategy across the Country. Rather than exposing Republicans false claims, with {Wisdom and Understanding}, that moves towards the center in Justice for All, they choose to lose by moving off the field entirely.
I must finally add that Establishment Democrats have been hypocrites of the Big Tent Party by their own Bull in the China Room Experiment of Identity Politics episodic of discrimination against their fellows in reform, rehab, prison, and jails opting to discriminate in their own Primary Debates of the U.S. Presidential Candidates representative of those entering the Race.
That is emblematic of what? The Elite Classes thoughts on who American's are? Who they ought to be? Well, let me say it in more simple terms. It's discrimination against middle and lower citizens by economic and class citizenship of the United States- all of who have the same power to VOTE!
Troubling thing about that? They are willing to discriminate against me as a Candidate for having a felony 25 years ago, but not Constitutionally Qualify a Presidential Candidate as [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Summation? Their moral compass is twisted!
Trump, Fiorina, and Carson were all Candidates who had never before held office who were also aloud on the Debate Stage by Republicans. Democrats marginalized their un-elected U.S. Presidential Candidates refusing to give them a Debate Stage in a horrible example of elite discrimination.
They are catering to a rich elite exclusive class that is indeed getting smaller and smaller across the Country and concentrated in higher population centers. Did Democrats show America how BIG THE TENT was or how SMALL it really is?
That is a recipe for disaster in the interest of the United States of America, and if that is not their interest, they are on a losing lunar space mission to planet WTFK that know one here can comprehend as to relativity of our United States History.
So is the Democratic Party worth saving? I tend to think of that as do they have the will to win? I think they do, and I think they are worth saving if they are willing to move towards the middle of America instead of out of the left field ballpark.
So is the Democratic Party worth saving? I tend to think of that as do they have the will to win? I think they do, and I think they are worth saving if they are willing to move towards the middle of America instead of out of the left field ballpark.
CRJ
think so little of the Qualifications of the President or highest Office of the Land -The Commander-In-Chief ?
