UNDERSTANDING CHANGE - Hillary Clinton's Compromised- What Happened to Her in the U.S. Senate?

- UNDERSTANDING CHANGE -  Hillary Clinton's Compromised 

What Happened to Her in the U.S. Senate?

~Intro ~
Hillary Clinton quit Barack Obama's Administration as Secretary of State some have said to place distance from Obama and other's have said to simply begin her 'self ' again. Why what Hillary Clinton knew and believed at one time, and perhaps even stood up for, has come to be a very important part for America to notice in her own transformation and change that is not in the best interest of this Country.

The idea that some people change after being in Washington DC is one we are all to familiar with. An unseemly transformation as the stalwart Candidate we voted for has through the battle scars in political war devolved from the barrage, suffering the inset of post traumatic political syndrome, becoming an incapable compromised person for which waging the same war is no longer possible as the strength of the warrior was spent from the valiant person we first sent.

Standing up for America under the U.S. Constitution's umbrella is not the easiest thing in the world because the risks America has been willing to take produced a reward that was not guaranteed and did not 'pay' politicians rewards for standing in line. It is not disrespectful to acknowledge our gratitude for the warrior, but also recognize that warrior simply cannot fight the war we face any more.

WE recognize a very big mistake to make that expectation on anyone. I myself have written Hillary Clinton with admiration of her principles as First Lady others thought she'd compromised by standing by her man through thick and thin.

 One of the great successes of America has been the 'fresh-faced' politician whose principles as tools, clean and polished, are able to make the Stand that is required.  Hillary Clinton is no longer able to carry on as strong as she once was for these principles, because they are know longer in tact under the Constitution and she is compromised. That transition took place about 2008. She'd gone from First Lady to U.S. Senator and was inching towards the nomination of the Democratic Party as a candidate for President, but those titles are short lived bridled by the Constitution's Reins on politicians.

One of the biggest reasons that WE, under our U.S. Constitution have given the Justices of the Supreme Court 'life tenure', predicated upon good behavior, is that it offered that Court the ability to fight for the Constitution's Individual rights; rising above  the clamor of bully politics and resting on the laurel lake of Our Principles.

That is important to notice. Of course we require an oath of all Politicians and Judges, but also recognize the ability for corruption to compromise everyone- even the Office of the President can be compromised and our Constitution lays out procedures that are very clear outlining that circumstance in the 25th Amendment, Sect 3, and 14th Amendment Section 3 that actually allows the removal of any person who after taking an oath comes to the point referred to as a 'Disability' upon the Nation.

The circumstances of such are defined for us as: 'Engaging in insurrection', 'Rebellion' against the same Oath', or 'Giving Aid or Comfort to the enemies of the U.S.' It is this first circumstance of action I would like to address as it pertains the the Office of the President and the Qualifications contained within the Constitution we know for only one other office- that of the Vice President- as it relates to Candidates running for the Office of President. This is the Standard set up as Principle by WE the People.

Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

• No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

The Compromise - Clueless Cruz Comments-Hillary Started the Birther Movement

Late last night I was engaged in the fight and made the following statement at Obamaconspiracy.com under the above mentioned story heading.  Because it took me awhile to recall the whereabouts of links formulating the comment below, I thought it a good thing to Record under this Blog, which is really becoming an inset into the fabric of Questions about the subject 'key-stone' of our Constitution- understood as the Office of the President, the comment for you Reporters. Its easy to forget and often hard to research or to even know what to research in following stories you might have been actually to young to pay attention to. Remember 7 years ago, many Reporters now were 14 years old.

Let me notice I've provided the kick-back link to Obama Conspiracy Site if you'd like to go back and see the volatile comments made by people who have been engaged in protecting Barack Obama for the last seven years. They are covered in anonymity and I just don't feel the need to give them room here on this blog, but the link is there if you'd like to go back and research the kind of treatment that oozes out and permeates continually Obama's Administration. Its pretty rough and is not the polite scene you see on Television.

Comment:
-------

RECORD OF HILLARY’S -sharing as asked

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/s2678/text

http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/clinton_ive_crossed_commanderi.html
HC ““I believe that I’ve done that… and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.

HC ” “There are certain critical issues that voters always look to in a general election. National security experience (and) the qualifications to be commander-in-chief are front and center. They always have been. They always will be,” she said.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-front-runner-s-fall/306944/

[What is clear from the internal documents is that Clinton’s loss derived not from any specific decision she made but rather from the preponderance of the many she did not make. Her hesitancy and habit of avoiding hard choices exacted a price that eventually sank her chances at the presidency. What follows is the inside account of how the campaign for the seemingly unstoppable Democratic nominee came into being, and then came apart.]

[Clinton was already under attack for an attitude of “inevitability”—the charge being that she imperiously viewed the primary process as a ratifying formality and would not deign to compete for what she felt she was owed]

[Penn also left no doubt about where he stood on the question of a positive versus negative strategy. He made the rather astonishing suggestion to target Obama’s “lack of American roots”:]

[On December 1 [2007], Clinton and her husband attended a private dinner with the influential Des Moines Register editorial board. Seated at opposite ends of a long table, they were stunned to hear journalists praise the skill and efficiency of the Obama and Edwards campaigns and question why Clinton’s own operation was so passive .. On the next morning’s staff conference call, Clinton exploded, demanding to know why the campaign wasn’t on the attack.]

Judy v. McCain https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61642

“Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States,” declares the resolution co-authored by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri.
The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
” Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread.”

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_028.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18web-hulse.html?pagewanted=print
[The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. ]

Rickey: Hillary Clinton was on record as saying that U.S. Sen Res 511 would probably not stand Constitutional scrutiny and or was flimsy to paraphrase her statement.

The last two refer to what I was talking about as far as a paraphrase of Clinton about U.S. Sen. Res 511 the quote speaking about all the ‘authors’ that might be considered co-sponsors and their input and feelings.

------

What is important to recognize that you can collect from the Links provided and the dialogue together as a citation considered as a whole is that Hillary Clinton recognized as well as Barack Obama that there was a jeopardy of Constitutional Principle at stake which if it had its perfect way would have prevented both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama from even using the bathroom in the White House let alone being Commander-in-Chief.

The reason this is important is because it shows us clearly not only the line that was crossed, but the knowledge that those crossing the line had and attributed with accrediting or identifying their own efforts.

"Of course, the authors (speaking of those co-sponsoring U.S. Senators who very well can be accredited with helping formulate words with suggestions and applications of intent and spirit of reasoning, as well as actually the ones getting the credit for writing U.S. Senate Resolution 511 out in long hand), acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain's eligibility hanging by a legal thread. "

Put plainly as we consider Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as co-sponsors of McCain's U.S. Senate Resolution 511, they knew it did not hold the power of an Amendment to the Constitution which must be passed by 2/3rds of Congress (Both Houses) and signed by a Qualified President to gain the devoted loyalty of the Judicial Branch or United States Supreme Court.

Author Mrs. McCaskell had originally penned S. 2678 which had failed, compromising the understanding that a natural born Citizen be '[b]orn in the United States to Citizen Parents',  giving it to to those born abroad to military personnel.   Again, that failed. I 've always thought it should have because it is a well known fact not everyone in the military can run for President anyway due to age restrictions and time in the U.S. as well as not being a 'natural born Citizen'. That is nothing new.

The authors and co-sponsors went back to the drawing board and made it personal to Sen. McCain with which the colleagues or good ole boys of the U.S. Senate good rally behind as they understood it was not a Constitutional Amendment.

 Just as easily noted the Judicial Branch through the highest Court is not required to uphold a 'message' from the United States Senate written on a yellow sticky pad, over and above the Constitution of the United States of America properly ratified and respected by The People and all their Representatives in Principle that is encoded in our Constitution. To do so not only represents bad behavior but is laying the grounds for impeachment of that life tenure job.

U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was the all important point of compromise of the Constitution made by those [C]andidates for President who were simply mad at the Constitution prohibiting any members in their chambers from becoming President. That's what it was. They were all pouty and mad about it because in that Chamber (U.S. Senate)  first generation Americans are welcome to be elected to it.

The Office of the President has by its definition in the Constitution welcomed a pure or non-foreign 2nd American Generation requirement of time. This is understood by the time it takes for a first generation Americans to have children here who are then eligible for the Office of the President. That requirement is what 'natural born Citizen' meant and that is backed up by history, tradition, and legal precedent.

The authors including Clinton and Obama recognized this and stated that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was at best a little thread that had no weight of enforcement under the Constitution as Amendments do, and that if put to the test under Court scrutiny it would simply be cut up. They could not justify that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 had any validity or standing in a Court of Law represented by in the Judicial Branch. That's why they all recognized and 'acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread'.

That's how flimsy they thought and knew it was in 2008 prior to the Election. Now with Barack Obama occupying the Office stampeding around the world on Air Force One as a power nutted minion and a walking talking violation of the Constitution, some how the Media is trying to justify what amounts to a Constitutional insurrection.

At least Claire McCaskill attempted to propose legislation on changing the 'natural born Citizen' clause to mean something different than what it did mean. Can we offer any of that same respect towards U.S. Senator Ted Cruz or how about U.S. Senator Marco Rubio? We can not. They have not legally proposed through their respective offices any such official proposals in their offices and instead are endeavored to just 'wipe out' the Constitution without Civil Order. That my friends is insurrection in their elected Offices.

In fact they are engaged in using the Funds contributed to them for their U.S. Senate Races for their Campaign races as President.  Side note: ( lets' just say for argument sake they are legal U.S. Citizens for the Office of a Senator. I know there is debate now even on that with Sen. Cruz officially having to denounce his Canadian Citizenship after he was elected a U.S. Senator and I'm sure he didn't represent himself as a Canadian in his Campaign while running for U.S. Senate which could be seen as a fraud and a different outcome imagined quite easily).

So, if you "use" the funds collected in a Campaign Race you were legal in, to support and sustain a new Campaign for which you are illegal, you are in the business of laundering money in an illegal operation. That Folks, is insurrection for the purposes of usurpation of the Office of the President and its got to STOP!

This is why noticed in another Comment in Debate on the above mentioned site Clueless Cruz Comments-Hillary Started the Birther Movement;, Obama was creating his own loophole, not McCains'.
-----

CRJ July 10, 2015 at 9:01 am  (Quote) # 

That’s because McCain had the same problem.

“Obama said: “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”

Calling the qualifications in the Constitution for the Office of President “a loophole” is exactly what they had to figure out how to jump through.

” The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specified a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”

Democrats knew McCain wasn’t qualified either, but they needed Republicans to get through that loophole Obama was going to need. This is nothing knew, but trying to say there was opposition from “Inside” the D’s or “Outside” from R’s is really sounding like a denial of the facts.(references to there comments made)

” SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by D-McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

On April 18, 2008, the New York Times concluded that the eligibility issue could only be resolved by a Constitutional amendment, but confirmed the political fait accompli.

“Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said D- Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”

Quotes:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
----

There is a big problem when it comes to Mrs. Clinton thinking she is owed the Office of the President, more especially because she is not fighting for it to be a sound Office under the Constitution. She's compromising it. I cannot begin to understand "Why". Maybe she's tired, maybe its just to big of a fight and Obama wore her out. But this much is True, she's not fighting for it any more, but has got a lot more money in the bank to attempt to 'purchase' or 'buy' the Office of the President with money employing 'sexism'.

Of course I respect women, their right to Choose, to be treated fairly, but I do not respect the reversal role of 'sexism' to gain the Office of the President over and above simply defending the 'principles of the Constitution'. If America has devolved into 'voting' for those who have stood in line with a different physical character trait on the outside, then they have devolved into a Nation of discrimination that does not honor the character of Spirit inside the person who is to be in the Office of the President.  I would not have a chance under those circumstances nor do I believe the Nation would survive such, so it wouldn't matter. I wouldn't be losing anything worthwhile.

SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS LEFT - SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS RIGHT

Not only am I the only Candidate in America who has a bi-partisan Federal Court Record fighting for the Office of the President and the Constitution I am the only one left still standing in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I am also right on the principle being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents'.

While I fight and scrap every day for American to look beyond physical characteristics I implore you to join me and support the fight that is right- Judy v. Obama 14-9396- while it can still be fought for by a warrior who is not compromised.

By supporting Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 you help protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Please, help him with a Contribution Today at his safe and secure PAYPAL Contribution Link Here.

Part II. Link Here

Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy for U.S.  President 2016

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING SCOTUS NEWS Justice Sotomayer's Decision Bids Well for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal Fund Raising Summer

BREAKING SCOTUS NEWS Justice Sotomayer's Decision Bids Well for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal Fund Raising SummerIt was a 'conservative gut-check' that erupted out of the Supreme Court of the United States July 7th. With the trouncing some "Conservatives", [more especially led and or supporting U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, as declared Candidates for President and potential Candidate for President Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal who is still in the exploratory committee stages of a Presidential run], have given the U.S. Supreme Court lately I am very surprised not to see them in jubilation and parade based on the decision U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer made that they could continue to stock their campaign coffers or war chest with campaign contributions as first generation Americans for the Office of the President.

Even though there is the September 28th "Long Conference" scheduled in the U.S. Supreme Court with the active Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396, its sub-divided case 25A15 was a clear 'GREEN LIGHT' for the Summer of Fun in Contribution Heaven for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal. The "DENIAL" of the "APPLICATION FOR MORE TIME" constituted the approval of the U.S. Supreme Court for these questionably qualified Candidates for President to 'go ahead' and ramp up steam just as Senator Obama did in 2008 against Hillary Clinton. One cannot help but wonder if the decision not to head'em off at the pass will again be the ghost that comes back to haunt the Clinton Camp the same way.

From OBAMACONSPIRACY.ORG a June 30th Article entitled, "Clueless Cruz comments: Hillary started the birther movement" there was a discussion in comments I took part in that I'd like to focus on very briefly with my follow up comments to this one:

[(Donna)From 2011: "Mike Huckabee says Republicans are wasting “energy and time” time with the “birther” argument about President Obama — because if it was true, Hillary Clinton’s team would have dug it up during the 2008 primary campaign."

(Loren says) -One of the earlier long-form articles about the Birther movement, which was published by The Atlantic or some similar online news outlet, cited sources from inside McCain’s camp who acknowledged that when the birth issue first started garnering public attention, folks in McCain’s campaign did what national campaigns always do with opposition research, and they looked into it.

And as the article noted, they quickly concluded there was absolutely no merit to it, and thus the McCain campaign never made an issue of it either.]

CRJ Responding Comment:

#1 [That’s because McCain had the same problem.

“Obama said: “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”

Calling the qualifications in the Constitution for the Office of President “a loophole” is exactly what they had to figure out how to jump through.

” The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specified a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”

Democrats knew McCain wasn’t qualified either but they needed Republicans to get through that loophole Obama was going to need. This is nothing knew, but trying to say there was opposition from “Inside” the D’s or “Outside” from R’s is really sounding like a denial of the facts.

” SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by D-McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

On April 18, 2008, the New York Times concluded that the eligibility issue could only be resolved by a Constitutional amendment, but confirmed the political fait accompli.

“Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said D- Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”

Quotes:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution]

#2 [Hillary Clinton was on record as saying that U.S. Sen Res 511 would probably not stand Constitutional scrutiny and or was flimsy to paraphrase her statement.

I took that as her last stand for integrity before selling out, understanding that though she had gone to bat for McCain in Co- Sponsoring 511, she also understood it was definitely just a signal turning left and not Constitutional as sound as an Amendment that would compromise the Office of the President to foreign influence by opening the door from “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” (which entails two generations) to the diluted state of one generation as understood by Aliens and Nationals naturalization processes of Title 8 and 14th Amend.

JUSTICE Sotomayer new Hero for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal in SCOTUS CASE #15A25 (?)

Can’t believe we haven’t heard of the parades and enthusistic jubilee yet From Doc?

I think Doc won the bet.. Based on his time line of “June” because the Judy v. Obama 25A15 Case has been ruled on that was Docketed June 29th.

My loss in the time frame constituted my coming on here and saying,” Doc was right and I was wrong. ”

I hope this fullfills that bet Doc(?). I just couldn’t quite get that positive affirmation that give ole Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal a green light to raise contribution funds through the Summer.

I gave it my best shot but admittingly came up short. I admit I’m somewhat hurt that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t back me up with a Amici on this. While she allows Rubio to pick up speed the same way she did Obama she may find the same outcome.

This has never truly been about me winning. It’s been about getting people who could win to stand up using the Constitution instead of abusing it.

An Amendment is proper and Civil. The bully tactic is rude and abusive.

http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/07/breaking-news-obamas-ineligibility.html?m=1 ]


THE APPLICATION OF TIME SOTOMAYER DENIED GREEN LIGHTING SUMMER FUND RAISING FOR CRUZ,RUBIO,JINDAL Unopposed by CLINTON.

The two significant parts of the EXTENSION OF TIME which was denied by Justice Sotomayer that allows Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal to continue raising funds through the 2015 Summer Quarter were stated as follows. The whole Application is also available at the bottom of this post.

9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.

10- Attending this PRINCIPLE of the U.S. Constitution is vital to the 46% of America’s Voters who are in fact now Independent Voters according to a January 2015 Gallup Poll . The Court avoiding the Issue does not serve them as it affects the race among republicans and democrats and we all look for guidance on the interpretation of the Constitutions’ demanding standards for the Office of the President being different than the “Citizen” standard for Senators and Representatives.
Petitioner then prays that this Motion will be granted in the considerations of the necessity requiring a decision before July 13th, 2015 as instructed by the Court through and by Justice Sotomayer, reviewing Justice for the 10th Circuit.

Hillary Clinton was given has been given an invitation to weigh in directly on this site as well as directing Tweets to her Twitter Account with an Amici to the United States Supreme Court but thus far has not.

With this information it is a double edged sword that 'conservatives' for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal vowing to undue the SCOTUS decisions of Obamacare do not see that it has been Justice Sotomayer who has allowed their Campaigns for President to flourish during the Summer months, while she has hurt fund raising efforts for my own bid for President with the delay costing me the whole Summer in a  lost momentum.

Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy for U.S.  President 2016

By supporting Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 you help protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Please, help him with a Contribution Today at his safe and secure PAYPAL Contribution Link Here.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY WARRANTS "LONG 2nd CONFERENCE" by SCOTUS JUSTICES!

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY WARRANTS "LONG 2nd CONFERENCE" by SCOTUS JUSTICES!

This day has been a remarkable day of revelations for me I just can't wait to get off my chest! First off, it was noticed on the Docket of the Court concerning Judy v. Obama 15A25,that United States Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer has 'DENIED' the APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME in my request that the Court give me more time to pay the Court fees and prepare the Brief according to the U.S. Supreme Court printing guidelines because I didn't have enough money to do that now, or at least wait until the Court had a chance to rule upon my Motion for Review and Reconsideration of my DENIED IFP also PENDING for a September 28th Conference Date.

Now the reason the APPLICATION FOR TIME EXTENSION was just a formality was because the Second CONFERENCE had already been scheduled for September 28th by the Court. My thoughts every since the Court had denied my in forma pauperis (IFP) Status was that they simply did so to buy more time to discuss it. That time would have necessarily disappeared if Justice Sotomayer had granted my APPLICATION FOR TIME, because what I proposed in that was actually "I wanna hurry this up and get it done during the Summer" and by Denying it Justice Sotomayer basically said, "We'd like to take some time on this and wait until September 28th where we have scheduled a "Long Conference" over it."

We already know that the DENIAL of the Motion for IFP Status was not due to being 'Frivolous' or as the Court Clerk said it would have been noted as Denied Pursuant to Rule 39.8 of the Supreme Court Rules which states again:

"8. If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis"

This was not stated on the Denial anywhere on the Order.

WHAT DOES THE SECOND "LONG CONFERENCE" MEAN RATHER THAN A "SHORT CONFERENCE"

What do I have to back such unspoken communication up? Well, I have the Court's own CALENDAR to back it up! Pictured above is the Supreme Court of the United States Calendar. Many were surprised that anything would be happening during the Month of July because the Court is 'Recessed' at the end of June. So, let's say that you thought they'd all gone home? Now you know we have Justice Sotomayer's Ruling July 7th proving to you that they didn't, even though they are indeed in Recess. I've stated before they use 'Recess' periods to go over Cases in developing and writing opinions as well as ruling on Motions and Applications of what are termed Active Cases.

They don't want to formally call my case 'Active', because, and this is my own speculations but its based on a conservative and realistic considerations that are facts- we might lose Air Force One with Obama on it to a Foreign safe haven.

What I did with the Title Picture of this Post is to make a copy of what the Court's Calendar looks like during the months of July, August, and September. Its blank, compared to the Calendar on the right of that picture which is filled with all kinds of color coded squares marking days that the Court will do things and then giving you the code to know what is being done on those days.

You will notice Days marked with a RED BOX are given to ARGUMENT DAYS. Those marked with a GREEN BOX are given to what we call 'CONFERENCES', but they are under what is termed silently a "SHORT CONFERENCE". Now how do we know that? Well, when I had my 1st Conference June 18th if you recall there were 177 Cases to get through that day. How long do you think the Justices can spend on one Case if they have 177 to go through in one day? Well, let's just say they did it in six hours thirty minutes of an eight hour work day.

That means they had 390 minutes that allowed for 2.2 minutes for each Case. That day June 18th, 165 Cases were sent packing on the DENIED LIST and only 12 came out alive one way or the other. Mine was placed on the PENDING MOTIONS LIST and we learned after the ORDERS LIST came out I had been denied IFP status. Of course the normal rebuttal for a denial like that is a RECONSIDERATION which got in and had a 2nd Conference Scheduled for.

What we must notice though is the surprise that the Court gave us in scheduling my 2nd Conference for September 28th! You notice that they could have given me another 'short conference' Day say October 9th or 16th when the normal Fall Session begins, but they didn't.

The Supreme Court of the United States scheduled my Case for September 28th which we know is a 'LONG CONFERENCE DATE'. So, that's the good news! The bad news is it doesn't appear they are interested in rushing the Case over the Summer which I kinda had hoped for. There will be many nay-sayers to the facts I have presented here, but I really think if you think this through and follow each step as it has happened that you will find they are tried and present a true picture of the facts.

The United States Supreme Court does not need a 'LONG CONFERENCE' to discuss amongst themselves wither I should or should not be given what amounts to $300 filing fee to the Court. A 'Short Conference' would suffice. I mean Yes, it would cost me more in printing up 48 copies in the booklet form, but remember that printing cost of upward of $4,000 dollars is not going to go to the Supreme Court. That would go to the printer. The filing fee is only $300, its not a matter of breaking a bank to pay for Justice so anyone whose telling you that the Court needs a Long Conference to hear a IFP case, or that the Court just does this for 'frivolous' cases is probably smoking some of that mushroom cloud stuff they now call legal in Colorado.

Believe me, they nay-Sayers on this are on both sides of the isle Democrats and Republicans because it has to do with not only Obama but Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal if he declares to run for President officially as the other two have. That's a whole lot of people trying their very best to dampen down the hope, and melt the courage. Of course it takes courage to stand up for Principles of our Constitution when you have quite a few people running around and stomping like the Devil's going to Georgia.

Now if for any reason we see that June 28th 2ND LONG CONFERENCE scheduled change, then we ought to worry that we don't have a prayer. Until that time comes, we sure do and we are doing better than anyone has yet cause we're East Bound and Down Rolling up we're Trucking, we're gonna do what they say can't be done. Well, we got a long way to go, and a short time to get there, I'm East bound just watch ole Bandit Run!


OTHER NEWS

This was a real big shocker to me today and I feel it is necessary for me to make confession. Today I found out about 3pm that LDS President of the Quorum of the Twelve Boyd K. Packer had passed away last Friday at 2pm.

I was absolutely shocked about this news and just learning it today. I have to confess a few things because it does seem silly that because he passed away on Friday that in some way I should have heard about it Friday Night, Saturday, Sunday or Monday morning, but it just was not the case. In my confessions I will tell you I do not have a TV as far as cable or regular stations. I have a TV but the cable for reception was broken in a move in 2004 and I've never fixed it because I really don't have time to watch TV and on the rare occasion I do, I just watch a video and works well hooked up to a DVD.

The Radio I have on my kitchen table had the antenna pulled out of it about two months ago and the clock stopped keeping time accurately. I have no idea why I keep it there. I haven't heard it on the car radio which isn't that surprising due to the channel I mostly keep it on. If it wasn't on the Drudge Report I didn't see it on the Internet. This is more disturbing to me than anyone else I suppose because I just can't fathom not being told by a single person and not hearing somehow or someway on the news. In a discussion with my Mom today she related she had listened to an interview conducted by and I wrote the names down so I could google it "Gregory Prince and Doug Fabriezo" which I did and that's how I found out he had passed away.

Just felt I needed to relay that because of the Dream I related in no way shape or form had any context to my knowing or understanding he had passed away Friday and was meant in absolutely no disrespect, but I could certainly understand if someone reading it Monday and knowing he had passed away on Friday might take it that way.

While I am not a member of the LDS Faith I would not undertake to relate something factious that might be construed to disrespect him in a way that was malicious and I certainly take no part in saying I controlled the dream while I slept. I rather thought it was quite revalatory in nature to myself even, for I would have no way of knowing the intricacies of the subjects whatsoever, and I did not know the man personally at all.

I actually called my Mom back later this afternoon and said, "Why didn't you say he had died?" She said, she just assumed I knew. Things like this really come to me as little insights that we are simply a small part of what is known and understood by God and if or when we ever discount that we do so at an extreme loss of balance, harmony, and knowledge of intelligence. Of course many things, everything in a dream can be symbolic, but it was dog-gone specific in naming him wan't it? So I thought I just needed to, you know, add a condolence to his Family and Friends with the understanding there was no malice of my heart in the relation whatsoever.

Thank you for understanding this.

COMMENT OF THE DAY SECTION

I also just wanted to send out a big thank you for my featured COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY and say what a treat that was for her to relate to me that she had found some use for the things I had done in the legal world. That was really sweet of her.
You know when all is said and done, can you name a single Case in United States Eligibility Questioning History that will this September 28th have lasted NINE MONTHS in the United States Supreme Court? I can't!

To say that we are not doing better than any other challenge in the HISTORY of Obama's Ineligibility would just be a fools errand. Nine Months! Whew! We have been in there fighting for really an incredible phenomenon in America's History that I believe is going to go down as one of the greatest FIGHTS for Liberty and Freedom in the World's History.

The other day I was thinking about Stands around certain parts of the Constitution. You know the pro choice/pro life stands on abortions that surround different parts of the Constitution; the pro 2nd Amendment Communities that include Gun Rights/and Gun Fights are pretty famous. Now look at Birthers and the fight to give our Nation a President void of foreign influence for two generations in the requirement of a 'natural born Citizen' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents that surrounds Article Two Patriots!

Whole industrious enterprises have sprung up from nothing about this. The Post & Email that just made this Post a Featured Editorial. The Birther Report, WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com , Obamaconspiracy.org, commanding the attention of huge populations of America.

They were really non-existent prior to 2008. Now we have them; Internet Communities and Organizations and On-Line Newspapers and Blogs across this whole Nation with that at their Center of Gravity both pro and con. Its really an amazing and unique part of American history that you all have made!

That brings me to a final point that I'd like to address in this Blog Post which is the 551st Post and it revolves around this comment that is made quite often in just a little different way every time but maintains the same jet-stream. That is the point that Obama has gotten away with this for so long that its just not fair not to let others get away with it like Cruz, Rubio, or Jindal. I cannot think of a greater double negative to set your Country on the course of.

Of all the accomplishments and accolades available in History, how does Usurper sound to you? Does any politician in the world want that Tag? If they do please follow the same course as Obama has. Lie about who you are, put out a fabricated identification and use your outwards characteristics to promote your agenda. That is not what building character is about and it certainly not the reputation anyone wants. On that point I think we can all agree.

Yes, Obama has had the pleasure of riding around on Air Force One and commanding the Country for six years. The rest of his life he will have to think about the cheating and awful circumstances by which he gained that pleasure but history will recall him in what really is going to be called the darkest years of American history and the sorriest set back for Civil Rights and our Voting Rights for all minorities that make the Citizenry of this Country!

I'm seeing black folks who are amazing Americans all, 'shaking my head' (SMH), saying for generations 'That boy shouldn't have done what he done. It was a lie and it was wrong,and that is not what America is about.'

Whew.. we have lasted 9 months in the United States Supreme Court! Nice!!! We have three months and I would like to come visit every State to say Hi. (smile)

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT [S]plits OBAMA 'INELIGIBILITY' CASE During Recess!

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT [S]plits OBAMA 'INELIGIBILITY' CASE During Recess!

The intensity was palpable- 'Hanging by a Thread' - 'Not Dead'.. Yet' - had all been used to describe Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the most intense case in the Land of Birtherdom which thus far had just refused to die in the Supreme Court of the United States. Most Americans' would never know the burden that lay upon a man who had sought for Justice but had not found it for what seemed an entire life time. Again he was on the all to familiar 'chopping block' waiting for news from those in high seats of authority wondering if Justice would gain a foothold or wither for a myriad of political reasons the Justices would impart to Justice what they felt was best for everyone leaving him the Dark Night for which the trespasses of Justices would be shouldered yet another day.

Few could comprehend the magnitude of the burden that lay upon his shoulders as he had fought and clawed his way back to the United States Supreme Court for the third time in his life. No one understood that the Constitution had been shredded for many years to him by the facts that all would agree that evidence was due to anyone in a Criminal Action, but his had been denied to him. That in and of itself was the proposal of malcontent by those who stated they esteemed Justice, but tied it in so many double knots that its simplicity was often unrecognizable.

For many Justice like journalism had become so lazy in a multi-leveled parking garage that fast-food was the home-cooked meal and the real deal did not exist. Americans could not remember where they had parked their own car because it required remembering for longer than the new eight seconds which pushed the limits of their attention span on the super fast computer highway they called the Internet. The only eight seconds that was still in tact as the real eternity was understood by a dying bread of bull-riders who strapped themselves on a two ton giant hoping to hang on long enough to win that purse which would get them to their next rodeo ride; and to those still waiting for this web page to pop up the government purposely slow tracked for their own advantage.

He could already count the people who were boiling mad at him for placing three paragraphs in front of the BREAKING NEWS, but he didn't care. He hadn't been elected by the fast, friendly, and convenient crowd and he preferred making home-cooked meals the time to cook which would have had three people fired at McDonalds for insubordination by now. There were definite advantages to speed but in some things taking the time was well worth the wait. Some things could wait; Like his first wedding he was twenty minutes late for. She still married him.

BREAKING NEWS OF THE DAY

It was one year ago today I filed this Case. Many people have been asking me what is happening with the Case and why they have not see the 'APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME", now read 3,421 times on the Internet SCRIBd Page since it was uploaded six days ago. That's quite a lot for something that is as boring as 'Court Filings' on a Case presumed to be Dead if you ask me.

What has happened? Why is it not Docketed on your Case No. 14-9396? Was it even filed? Well, yes it was filed, and it is Docketed.

What the Supreme Court of the United States of America did was make a sub-division and assigned that Application its very own Court Case number which is understood to be Judy v. Obama 15A25. Yeah, that's kind of cool if you didn't know they could do that.

There are some positives and some negatives associated with it; I'll explain. When an APPLICATION is made to the Court it is governed by Rule 22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States. Part 4 of that rule explains very clearly why the whole Case is on the chopping block with this decision and could simply be blown away by the Justice governing individual applications for the Tenth Circuit which is Justice Sotomayer.

The first clause of Part 4 of Rule 22 states:
[A Justice denying an application will note the denial thereon. Thereafter, unless action thereon is restricted by law to the Circuit Justice or is untimely under Rule 30.2, the party making an application, except in the case of an application for an extension of time, may renew it to any other Justice, subject to the provisions of this Rule.]


I've highlighted the concerning part for all of those hoping for this case. In other words, we do not get to make another application for an extension of time to another Justice on two counts. Number one its obviously prohibited as is in bold print above- Number 2 - the Court stated that the fees were to be paid to the Court and the Printing requirements full filled that would cost around $4,000 would need to be done by July 13th. We tried to raise the money but failed to do so in the time allowed specified in that Order of the Court made June 18th. We did however raise enough money to get this APPLICATION filed and Docketed in the time that was needed to get that done at least, but we are on the chopping block folks.

Normally, I would have thought we would have had a ruling on this Application printed out on the SUPREME COURT ORDERS that usually appears as Miscellaneous Orders THURSDAY 7-02-15, but it wasn't there although as you can see it was Docketed June 29th. These Miscellaneous Orders really are not bound to a schedule when the Court is in its '(Working) Recess Period'. I say 'working' because many think that during Recess of the Court everyone goes home for three months, but that is not the Case.

The Court continues to work on Active Cases and to rule upon Motions and Applications just like this one as well as work on writing opinions. We can expect a decision on this Application tomorrow Friday July 10th, Monday July 13th- which is the Dooms Day the Case was given to comply with Paying the Fees and Printing Cost, or at the latest July 16th which is next Thursday.

Now, we also know on the regular Case Docket that a 2nd Conference has been ORDERED by the Court. That 2ND CONFERENCE is Calendared by the Court September 29th, 2015, [Important Point: I cannot personally Calendar Conferences of the Court as many have accused in a summation this whole thing I've concocted legally in the Court without the Clerks or Justices doing anything but Docketing what I tell them to (smile)]

SUMMING IT UP
So..this should give you all just a little taste of a little bit of hand-wringing, palms sweating
, Nail biting, whatever it is that you do that is going on here at the CRJ Camp that we are experiencing at this time. To Sum it up Justice Sotomayer (Also nominated by Obama- Don't forget!) does have it within her powers to DENY the APPLICATION FOR MORE TIME, which then would necessarily make the July 13th Dooms Day Dismissal go into effect, and the 2nd CONFERENCE would necessarily be canceled due to the Case's dismissal July 13th. Our hard work goes down in flames.

The cowboys say, 'Ya Cowboy up and ya Spur'em in the Guts! You ride HARD till you get bucked off.' That's what we have done here, and that's what we will keep on doing. If we live we live. If we die we die knowing we did our best and it just wasn't our turn. I always have faith in Justice coming around and its usually worse for those who delay it, and avoid it, then those who stand up and face it Responsibly. I do believe the public at least has that respect for what we have done here even if our fund raising project come up short.
Supreme Court Justice Thomas: We're Evading Article II Eligibility Issue - 4/16/10


Cody Robert Judy/CRJ Camp/ - Presidential Campaign 2016

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI.,AZ., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!

*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING REPORT: OBAMA America's Worst Nightmare 'FOLDING' in U.S. Supreme Court?

BREAKING REPORT: OBAMA America's Worst Nightmare 'FOLDING' in U.S. Supreme Court?

The most popular post of this Blog's entire history are about "Obama's Ineligibility" and the question of his "Resigning". People are interested in the Constitution being upheld, but they are skeptical about 'Justice' being carried out and it seems their skepticism is fueling their worst nightmare rather than encouraging their dream. Skepticism is a disease for hope and faith. "I'll believe when I see it", is also a self-full filing prophesy. What is that?

Self-full filling prophesy is as [a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior], or negative I might add. In other words, your 'believe' in doubting, skepticism, and an all-around apathy for the consideration at hand, may doom the enterprise you actually wanted to see succeed rather than fail.

So what happens when a whole bunch of people get together and say, "He's gonna fail". Well, they do not contribute, they act upon him as if he is their enemy and they are the worst sort of antagonist they possibly can be. And this is all done with the 'hope' in the back of their mind that he succeeds beyond their wildest imaginations. Now for those people right now I have to report that the Lord is very angry with you. This report very much concerns those who are rich and could right now today write out a check for $2,700 for the husband and $2,700 dollars for the wife that equal more than the $5,000 dollars necessary to pay the filing fee and the printing cost of the Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Case in the United States Supreme Court today.

One couple in a single maximum contributions could have made a big difference. Who might that couple have been who failed? Who might have been that couple who were on the verge of it, but failed because of their lack of faith and belief fueled by their own doubts, self-full filling prophesy, and or apathy? Please let's review some facts that at least we can rely on as TRUTH that should have placed all doubts, all apathy, and all negative behaviors towards me and my Campaign away, shall we? I want to speak to Republicans who are very well off right now who could do this with a snap right now because that is what the Lord showed me in a dream last night.

I must confess that if it were not for my DREAMS of TRUTH and RIGHTEOUSNESS I would not be the only Presidential Candidate in America today to hold the principle of the 'natural born Citizen' clause up by Federal Court Record amongst both Republicans and Democrats. I do not say that 'bragging up myself' as a feather in my cap, because did you hear me say that I would not be that man unless it were for my DREAMS? I mean that literally.

Of course there are many kinds of dreams for many reasons including what you had to eat and what you were hoping or doing, but there are also the DREAMS of prophesy given to a person to act as I referred to in TRUTH AND RIGHTEOUSNESS.
How many people believe President George Washington's words when he said in 1796 :
"Towards the preservation of your government...it is requisite...that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown."

I say unto you; is there any greater truth to you this day that comes by a usurpation of the 'natural born Citizen' clause understood to be 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' to exactly what President Washington was elaborating upon in this statement? You think about the disaster and I almost want to say 'total disaster' that Obama has been in all of the 'key' talking points of the Republican Candidates for President, yes, however diverse or trivial they may be to you, think of all of them and then ask yourselves "Why haven't any of them sued Obama for damages upon their campaigns for not being a natural born Citizen?" "Why is Cody Robert Judy the only one who has done this?" "Why is his name in the U.S. Supreme Court and Mr. Cruz's, Mr. Rubio's, Mr. Christie's, Mr. Trump's, Mr. Walker's, Mr. Romney's, Mr. Huckabee's , Mr. J. Bush's, Mr. Paul's,Mr. Carson, Mrs. Fiorina, Mr. Santorum,Mr. Pataki,Mr. Graham, Mr. Perry,Mr. Jindal,and Mr. Kasich, are not?
Would it all be because of Mr. Senator McCain?

Mr. Trump has added if nothing else a jolt of reckoning to all the major Republican Candidates, but what is the jolt besides his lead reported now of 13.6% in all polls combined? [HERE]and [HEAR]

The TRUTH of the REVOLVING OPEN DOOR?

An interesting tid-bit surfaced about the truth as Romney,Rubio, and Bush criticized Mr Trump in a report offered by Breitbart by Mathew Boyle who wrote:[What’s odd about this situation is that objective evidence proves that Trump is correct, and there seems to be a politically correct machine pushing all these politicians to attack the truth.] and then he made the case of Mr. Trumps statement that Mexico wasn't interested in seeing their very best go to America as illegal aliens with no less than five cases that really are a consideration if your concerned with your family being raped or even murdered that tells of an agenda among even hard working industrious folks who are all illegal aliens in the first place Trump was speaking about.

I heard not one word from Mr. Trump slamming Americans who are legal immigrants.. not one word. Now if you want to play the 'drifting quote game' on race relations and attribute those false narratives equally among Presidential Candidates, you'd have to include this one from Candidate Clinton:

Now I don't doubt Mrs. Clinton is not racist any more than Mr. Trump at their heart and isn't that what we should be looking at rather than the false narrative Shakira tapped out as was reported July 2nd [Shakira has blasted Donald Trump's 'hateful and racist' speech on Mexican immigrants], we all know Mr. Trump was talking about illegal aliens crossing the borders illegally and not legal Mexican immigrants who are Americans now. I absolutely adore Shakira by the way and think her music is some of the best and fun I love to dance to. Again, I wouldn't hold her 'whole person' accountable to one statement perhaps even made in a lack of knowledge or bad information, or else I'd have to never listen or buy another song from her.

We can see how fast 'DIVISION' happens and how easily the worst about someone can really wipe out all of the good about someone. Of course Shakira doesn't want her kids,Milan Piqué i Mebarak and Sasha Piqué i Mebarak being raped or killed as 5 time deported illegal alien Francisco Sanchez is alleged to have done July 4th, than the rest of us do and that is something I think I can say we all have in common without even asking her. Of course she is not American but is Colombian and lives in Spain although her American Audience has had a great deal to do with her success with Sony reporting, Shakira is the highest-selling Colombian artist of all time, having sold between 50 and 60 million records. She can certainly say what she wants, but as far as the Constitution of the United States she has only 'business interest' and a 'fan' base in America. We as Americans have to see to the business of keep America strong, independent, and our Constitution in tact.


THE MONEY REPORT

Now all of the people of the United States who have money. You see what is happening in Greece with Banks preparing to raid deposits in order to avert collapse? You also see why American's have been busy scuffling over what meaning the 'Confederate flag' has compared to the Denver Broncos fan flag, a report has surfaced of 8.5 Trillion Dollars that has gone missing along with some nuclear bombs. Can you imagine losing that kind of money along with a few nukes?

As is noticed by this video and really has to be acknowledged by everyone the month of June, that just happened to be correlated with the June 18th Conference of Judy v. Obama 14-9396, was just crazy. Distractions distractions distractions to keep America's eye focused on what they wanted it focused on instead of where it should have been focused.

Facts direct us to understand that most well funded intelligence agencies we know as the CIA and FBI report to Obama.The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) reports directly to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI); in practice, the director deals with the DNI, Congress, and the White House, while the Deputy Director is the internal executive.

The Director of National Intelligence serves as the head of the Intelligence Community, overseeing and directing the implementation of the National Intelligence Program and acting as the principal adviser to the President, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council for intelligence matters related to national security.

With those facts, how is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 relatively related to the focus of all of these organizations under the the direction and investigation orders of Obama? Do you think what I am doing in the United States Supreme Court is dangerous? I understate those facts to you, nor can I understate the facts that the United States Supreme Court did not wipe my Case away in the June 18th Conference with a flyswatter so easily available to them. Does Justice have a chance in this Country? I assure with these facts that it does! If you haven' contributed or read the facts of my Report and Conference with the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court you need to do that here with special attention to #4 .

You know the worst part of this job is having to tell people what a crappy job they are doing? I really really really hate doing that, but with what I am about to show you I think your going to have to agree with me. Of course I'm in this boat sink, float, sail,..whatever with you. I've gotten more legal advice and fewer dollars than a lawyer whose wet behind his ears from walking across the graduate stage.

What's the bad news? Well it has to do with money and those who have it, not giving it where it matters in the interest of this Country and our Constitution. Many people do not know what kind of contributions and how much are legal, so I think it is worth posting up.

Contribution limits according to the FEC

An individual may give a maximum of:
$2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee. Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections.

$5,000 per calendar year to a PAC. This limit applies to a PAC (political action committee) that supports Federal candidates. (PACs are neither party committees nor candidate committees. Some PACs are sponsored by corporations and unions--trade, industry and labor PACs. Other PACs, often ideological, do not have a corporate or labor sponsor and are therefore called nonconnected PACs.) PACs use your contributions to make their own contributions to Federal candidates and to fund other election-related activities.

$100 in currency (cash) to any political committee. (Anonymous cash contributions may not exceed $50.) Contributions exceeding $100 must be made by check, money order or other written instrument.

Basically what this means is I do not have any reason to be embarrassed to my Maker about what I have done in following directions, but the folks with money who are not supporting this effort really do, and you need to know the Lord sees it very clearly.

Of course you may not think it worthy consideration as a moral issue, but I really feel it is an emphasized direction from the Divine Source also attributed by President George Washington as stated in 1792:

"I am sure there never was a people, who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States, and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them."

We had two donations through the 4th of July Holiday weekend totaling $62.41 and in Total since the June 18th Conference where my Case in the United States Supreme Court was put on the 'Pending Motions List' rather than the 'Denied' /or/ "Dead List" that every other Court Case regarding Obama's Eligibility has been placed upon has ended up on, we have had around 25 separate contributions roughly come in totaling less than $1500.

God Bless those who have contributed, from the smallest donation of $2 to the highest contributor of $200, and what do you suppose I am to say about those who have not contributed which might have to do with God? I cannot stop that you know. I just can't.

SO I HAD A DREAM LAST NIGHT

So I had a dream last night I will tell as it was with nothing added so help me God.

[ I saw myself telling my step mother thank you for a contribution. She was a fair lady from Charleston, South Carolina who had remarried and had done well as far as having a little more money. She was writing me out a $150 dollar check and I thanked her for it graciously. When suddenly, a call came to my cell phone. I was torn to take it while dealing directly with this Lady, but opted as our business was nearly settled in formalities, and the importance of the call pressed upon me coming in, to take it.

" Hello, this is Cody Robert Judy", I said. On the other line I heard a man's voice. " Mr. Judy, this is, (I do not recall the name Mr. so-in-so). I have seen a report that has been circulating. I saw a flash of a story that was making headlines of mine. It was one I had also distributed over and over as well as others who had made quite a spectacle of it. We might say it was one that had gone as we say viral that had to do with my United States Supreme Court Case. I saw it constantly repeated near obnoxiously on the internet.

Mr. so-in-so was a bread maker and had many stores across the Nation. He welcomed me to stop in at any of his stores in very hospitable fashion. I truly felt welcome. He proceeded with a conversation with me on the phone about intelligence from God. I do not recall the exact format, but I do recall the following details.

In some what of a dissertation of communication with God he prospected a realization that at times God jumps the line. Meaning at times God does not follow a particular order that you would normally expect. As an example of this and for substantiating reason for it he brought to my attention the fact that LDS President of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles Boyd K. Packer had devolved upon two particular actions in foreign Country's that were themselves illegal.

I did not have the foggiest idea of those actions, nor do I now, but I did see a spirit come upon Boyd K. Packer of this action which he endeavored which ought nought to have been done and it involved writings and communications the full purpose of which was not recognized nor did it accentuate or come to pass having been blocked to his frustration.

This was not related to me in any way as far as my person, but was simply more of Mr. so-in-so's musings to himself and me as to looking at the facts he knew about but I did not, but also that actually bode more well for me and my cause and relations to God. I remember expressly repeating to him at least twice, "Whats best for the all the parties involved", in reference to all of those involved with actions with me, and also including myself.

He then asked me if I golfed. I said "Yes, I do", and then he asked me if I had a 'clean set of golf clubs' which I thought about and repeated again "Yes". He then asked me if I could meet him on a golf course on the next day, to which I repeated that I would be more than happy to. I thought in my dream of his generosity to pay my golfing fees for the day, buying my drinks of refreshment and perhaps a contribution at the end of the round coming up to around $500.

I thought I must get to the practice field and hit a few buckets of balls to tighten my straight ball swing out a bit as I was out of much practice.] This was the end of the dream that I recall.

------------

As I have pondered this, I have put a few things in perspective. Certainly I have not had any rich philanthropist contributing to my Campaign. The facts of my case in the consideration of the Constitution and its interpretation of the founders and signers is sure and I'd like to bolster that up with a very well written piece published by an attorney I respect and admire who has handled some Ineligibility Cases that related to Ballot Challenges in 2012 towards Mr. Obama entitled JULY 4TH 1776 The Birth Day of the Nation and the Natural Born Citizen, by: Mario Apuzzo.

A Real Credit to David Ramsay
David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815) was an American physician, patriot, and historian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congress in 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States in Congress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians.

Quoting the article again with emphasis on #4 [4th. None can claim citizenship as a birth-right, but such as have been born since the declaration of independence, for obvious reasons: no man can be born a citizen of a state or government, which did not exist at the time of this birth. Citizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken a part in the last revolution; but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens. Those who died before the revolution, could leave no political character to their children, but of subjects, which they themselves possessed. If they had lived, no one could be certain whether they would have adhered to the king or congress. Their children, therefore, may claim by inheritance the rights of “British subjects,” but not of “American citizens.” ]

[Here we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential Founder defined a natural born citizen. Noah Webster, 1828, in explaining how an American dictionary of the English language was necessary because American words took on different meanings than the same word in England, placed David Ramsay among great Founders such as “Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jay, Madison, Marshall, Ramsay, Dwight, Smith, Trumbull...” Given his position of influence and especially given that he was a highly respected historian, Ramsay would have had the contacts with other influential Founders and Framers and would have known how they too defined a natural born citizen. Ramsay, being of the Founding generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a natural born citizen and he told us that such a person was one born in the country to citizen parents. In giving us this definition, it is clear that Ramsay did not follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of nations, and Emer de Vattel, who also defined the “natives, or natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his highly acclaimed and influential treatise, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English).]

AGAIN, WHERE DO YOU STAND?

We all must answer to the stand we have taken. Wither it be for me or against me as it pertains simply to Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court for the damages I have suffered as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 and 2012, as well as do now suffer in my 2016 Campaign. What damages are those?

Every dollar collected by an ineligible Candidate is also a damage that I can say occurred against the will penned of and under the protections of what we call the Constitution of the United States. How much has U.S. Senator Ted Cruz himself illegal in the Office of the President reported collecting? Since March, which was also the month of my Case being recognized in the United States Supreme Court, 51 Million dollars is reported. [Ted Cruz's presidential campaign said Sunday it had raised about $10 million in the second quarter. The sum is fueled by small-dollar donors, they said.]

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, also ineligible for the Office of the President through his fund raising efforts reports he has a $10 million dollar man and has raised 14 million in 2014, raising a total of what is said to be 31 million.

The relative likelihood that just these two campaigns are involved in money that is being committed on the basis of fraud against the United States Constitution just since March combines for a total of over 70 million dollars. How important is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in value just in taking a look at the opposition of Campaigns and Commitments to those Campaigns?

What I hope to have shown you today is the importance of undertaking we are involved in here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp. To underestimate our value is a real dis-service to our Nation's principles and the history of the United States. To do such dis-service and walk around calling yourself a patriot is about as big of a disgrace as you can make of yourself. I am formally calling upon all Americans to move forward on this, to press ahead diligently on their social media sites, to send it to their local press reporters, and as they have the capacity to contribute directly to do so TODAY.

While we were short to get our Fees and Printing finished the Supreme Court has extended the time as is noticed by the SECOND CONFERENCE scheduled. I feel pressed to ask again all Americans if they think this work is not a good work? If they think for one instances that I myself am not in the cross hairs of high powered scopes? And if they realize that without protections and concern for this understanding the magnitude of it, that they might realize it in a day I am also dead. Who will they then count on in this highest of accountability for Justice in the Principle? I certainly am in service to you as a brother in Christ. If you do not believe that you have no accounting of facts or relative accounting of purpose in any regard for the principles, freedoms, and liberties afforded only by the Constitution of the United States of America. Which of these rights do you now love and which are you prepared to give away?

What I am saying is with just the viewers of this Blog there should be no way that we haven't achieved our Fund Raising Goal of $5,000 set for June 18th till Today June 6th exactly one week before the July 13th Deadline that was on the Docket Report. Through my own diligence to the Court costing what lawyers would charge upward of $5,000 for two Motions expeditiously delivered to the Court we have a SECOND CONFERENCE date. Now I believe that is a second chance for you to get with the program and get yourself on Record in Heaven and Earth to having taken a stand where there should be no question whatsoever on where you should be by reason, facts, and principle.

Help me Patriots Today to make a Better America Tomorrow!
Cody Robert Judy

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!

*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI