BREAKING NEWS: MOUNTAIN MAN in OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY Case BREAKS Through the BARRIER OF SCOTUS?
From the ROCKY MOUNTAINS located in Utah's Western Region of the United States of America the 2016 Cody Robert Judy for President Campaign releases BREAKING NEWS about JUDY v. OBAMA aka SOETORO Case No. 14-9396 in the U.S. Supreme Court. From the 2008, 2012, and hopeful 2016 Candidate this Breaking News Release is made for IMMEDIATE PRESS & PUBLIC RELEASE. For those simply wishing to see the Document Filed/&/Delivered to the Court today you may find it embedded at the bottom of this post as a convenience for that interest.
CODY'S REPORT
My report to you today comes with a little bit of mixed emotions. Maybe the most difficult thing to say in the midst of needing your support is together we can't even get off the first Tee because we can't find anything to launch our golf ball off of when it comes to my law suit in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396. You have to imagine how embarrassing it is when setting your ball up on the first Tee to see it keep failing or falling off because your Tee won't support the ball for whatever reason.
Exasperated you do not have any solid wood Tee to simply set your ball on so that you can hit it with your driver down the fairway. People always watch the first Tee shot at a golf match. There is usually a crowd there watching their golfer Tee off. What happens there is something of a story people will talk about as if that first Tee shot is an indication of how he's going to do the entire 18 holes of golf. "He T'd off well", "Did you see that first shot!", "Wow!", are all part of confidence and indeed a part of 'Hope'.
It's a little bit of a false narrative because so many people screw up their second shot after making a good Tee shot, but fewer people are watching that second shot. It is also true that more golfers blow it in the middle of the course when their nerves start to fray and just a little more fatigue has set in that is fertilizer for growing their sloppy zone. Blowing it on the first Tee, or not even being able to get the ball on a stable Tee has been my problem in Judy v. Obama 14-9396.
Normally, you submit your Writ of Certiorari, the Court dockets it, and your Original Conference is your first shot off the Tee. If you are lacking support you file a Motion to go in forma pauperis. This asks the Court to waive the filing fee, and an additional non-Court fee that entails the expense of printing 45-48 booklet style pamphlets of your Writ that can cost any where from two to four thousand dollars just to print and serve up. The Court denied my Motion to proceed that way which was my first 'Failed' attempt to Tee the ball up.
My second failure has come in the way of trying to Tee it up with a second Motion for a Reconsideration of that Denial with new evidence provided showing primarily I just don't have the funds to come up with that, and secondarily if I did by July 13th it would require having the document at the printer by July 1, because we have the 4th of July holiday to get around. That's the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th of July which puts us at Monday the 8th with only 5 days until the 13th of July which I have learned is really not enough time to even depend upon PRIORITY MAIL.
Now why do I call this 2nd attempt a failure if it was just docketed in the Court June 24th? Well, because seven days later which was the 29th of June the Court didn't rule on it and call it an inconvenience or referee interference but the end of June was it as far as finishing the term of the Court. The Supreme Court recesses all of July, all of August, and all of September.
So, yesterday June 30th I called the Supreme Court and after being channeled away through three levels of Clerks finally got an answering machine at the Office of the Clerks that deals with forma pauperis proceedings. I left a message. Jeff called me back and here are the bullet points I was told.
Q. When will my Motion for a Reconsideration Review on the Denial of my forma pauperis proceeding be able to take place? I waited about 75 days from March 30th to June 18th for it to be denied originally?
1) A.The Court unfortunately has recessed at the end of June so the Motion for Reconsideration will be addressed after the Summer recess which would be October 1st.
What Jeff was telling me was that I had waited 75 days to have the first one fail and it was going to take another 90 days to get another shot at it. Can everyone say their favorite swear words with me? (smile)
Q. Will the Court consider my Motion for Reconsideration with the updated information in it to be a stay on their dismissing my Case if I don't pay the fees by July 13th?
2) A. NO. The court will not consider your Motion for Reconsideration to be a Stay on dismissal July 13th if fees are not paid.
What Jeff had just told me was conundrum. On both hands my Case was doomed. It would be dismissed by July 13th without the "Motion for a Review of the Denial of forma pauperis" even being considered that he said would happen October 1st. There lays, on the other hand of the Court, within that circumstance the ability for the Court in its consideration of my Motion of June 24 post up for the Court's consideration October 1st, to take a look at the Case and see it was dismissed July 13th, and say, well, this Motion doesn't really need to be considered anyway and DENIED.
If the Case were to be considered in October and let's just say the Court decided to hear it in the most favorable circumstances available. It is a tremendous blow to me and here is why. Waiting until October and then asking for Briefs and anticipating from the Respondent(s) to act in the most 'normal' way as far as proceeding in the Court would have them asking for a thirty day extension of time to file a Brief in Response (B.I.O.) from the thirty days the Court gave them already. That means their response comes into the Court the 1st of December.
Now what happens in 2016 whilst nine months of 2015 were simply wasted in time delays either by the Court or by the Respondent's because my Case was docketed March 30th? Does 2016 seem like a good year to hash this out? Its not. Its horrible! I'll tell you why. Because then its a Presidential election year. The Court has simply through delay wasted my Candidacy for President because it allows the steam engines of all the other Candidates for President to get going stuck in the fog of the question of 'everyone' being a 'natural born Citizen' and having all of them qualified for their runs without due process or judicial remedy, because of the 'time' factor it takes in the Courts.
Civil Cases do not require the guarantee of a 'speedy trial' like criminal cases. I saw the same thing happen in 2012 as my Case against Obama hit the Docket of the Court and take six months to get docketed, and then be dismissed after the Summer recess which placed us just two months before the election of November. The Courts do not like to be the arbitrators of bad news in our Republic during an election year, especially if that bad news means disqualifying a Candidate, the Campaign of millions of dollars of that Candidate, and dashing the hopes and dreams of all those who had supported the Candidate even if the Candidate had taken all the money of the supporters by Fraud because he/she was not qualified.
Its called 'the Political Question Doctrine'. [The political question doctrine holds that some questions, in their nature, are fundamentally political, and not legal, and if a question is fundamentally political ... then the court will refuse to hear that case. It will claim that it doesn't have jurisdiction. And it will leave that question to some other aspect of the political process to settle out.
—John E. Finn, professor of government, 2006 ]
Now all of this should help us see the 'VALUE' of addressing this in 2015. You might have noticed three Republican Candidates for President all polling in single digits like U.S. Sen. Cruz, U.S. Sen. Rubio, and Gov. Bobby Jindal none of whom are qualified for the Office of the President. As single candidates you might say that's not much, but together they combine to represent up to 30% of the whole Republican Party ramping up behind Candidates who are not qualified for the Office of President as a 'natural born Citizen(s)' i.e. [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]
The joy of seeking 'Justice' or wading through all of this is like enjoying the ride in a blender. This is my third run for President and I've witnessed Justice skirt the law with time delays that were very damaging in 2008 and 2012 and we are witnessing the same thing happening in 2016. "Perseverance, perseverance, perseverance..please God.. give me patients patients patients.", all the while your being told Justice and Truth don't matter any more and being given a list of reasons why you should 'give it up',all including an attack on your own sanity because you keep trying and hoping maybe there was something you did that was incorrect. Maybe there was something that the Court actually did require you didn't provide. Maybe there was a process that the Court required you to go through first before addressing the issue.
I'm telling you folks, I've been that route. I have filed for the Principle against both parties in Republicans McCain and Democrat's Obama aka Soetoro. I have exhausted State Remedies in 2012 that pushed us into the U.S. Supreme Court in October only to be dismissed because of the election. Should Justice sacrifice the integrity of our Elections or Justice itself because of the timing of our elections? Our own Constitution says "No" because in the XX Amendment it clearly states someone can be 'elected and still fail to qualify', and the ability to remove someone for a disability exist at any time as well as the impeachment process for those who are qualified. Our Constitution says nothing about upholding corruption at any time; including before, during, and after an Election! So why do we have a person in the White House who has fraudulent identifications according to law enforcement investigations and is not qualified according to a simple understanding of the Constitution that our President be a 'natural born Citizen' unless a 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution which is still the requirement for Representatives and Senators to this day?
I had two more questions for the SCOTUS Clerk
Q. Who is the Justice receiving MOTIONS for those Appealing out of the 10th Circuit Court?
3. A. That is Justice Sotomayer.
Remember, Justice Sotomayer was indeed nominated by Barack Obama in 2009 when everything was controlled by Democrats. i.e. The House, The Senate, and the Executive Branch or Presidency. However, perhaps if true to form, " Sotomayor has been identified with concern for the rights of defendants, calls for reform of the criminal justice system, and making impassioned dissents on issues of race, gender and ethnic identity". Would those principles overrule her gratitude of being nominated by Obama? My feeling is that deep within the soul of a person is a greater loyalty to the principles that guide the person than any particular political person. If she is the reason my Motion for forma pauperis has been denied in the first place, she has done a great injustice to those principles she has advocated for. Keep reading, I'll show you how we're going to find out which it is.
Q. Would the Court specifically state "Pursuant Rule 39.8" if that is the reason a Case of forma pauperis is denied?
4. A. Yes
SCOTUS RULES 39.8 STATES [8. If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis]
The reason this is very important is because there is a lot of speculation that because the lower Courts found my case frivolous that this was the reason that the SCOTUS denied my forma pauperis, where I have contended a couple of the biggest reasons the Utah Division and Tenth Circuit ruled that way was because 1) They thought it should be handled by the SCOTUS. 2) There is ample evidence that there are BIG reasons in Utah and Justices now on the TENTH CIRCUIT panel that support a Case of injustice based on prior commitments and appointments rather than in the order of 'Justice', which is also included in my Petition to the SCOTUS for consideration.
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
People wonder why they matter? Why does justice, and truth, honor and love even matter? When you find yourself amidst corruption, lies, disrespecting abuse and hate you have a whole new world opened up to you that actually places hope in seeds for justice, truth, honor and love to sprout and live. How many married couples really hope their partner cheats and lies to them today? How many people will walk into a bank hoping that their money is gone and they have been cheated out of it? To say 'these' things don't matter to everyone of us is just a lie. They do matter, and they matter a lot. That's why it matters that we have a Constitutionally qualified person in the White House as President, because Fraud even with a smile on it, makes us ill.
Obviously we have a big character problem here in America. We can blame everyone around us but ultimately we have to take a look in the mirror and ask ourselves individually, " Do I like having someone taking advantage of me? Does that help enforce my self esteem? Do I appreciate a good fraud upon my finances? Probably the most important question politically speaking- Do I want to place my vote on the ballot for someone who is a Fraud?
Let's get real, means how about we try being honest today? Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is representing the biggest identity fraud in the history of America and all of Congress knows it. They know it but they are not in a position to do anything about it. However, they are in a position to support someone who is and can do something about it and they are not doing that. What that tells you is they are more comfortable supporting the Fraud than they are supporting the Truth when it comes to Obama.
I've had several complaints from people who say, "Why don't you just give an 'executive summary' of what happened in Court instead of making us read an entire page of gibberish? Ask yourself why the U.S. Supreme Court chooses to make what could be stated in one sentence i.e. "Same-Sex Couples have the right to marry in all 50 States" , into a 35 page document most Americans have not and will not even take the time to read? Quite obviously, if Obama got the votes of half of America and he did so under the auspices of Fraud that was known and has been continually revealed in greater and greater detail, we have a problem that requires some very sincere thought about what I just discussed in the prior three paragraphs. If you won't read 35 pages of the Supreme Court Decision legalizing same-sex marriage, maybe you will read three paragraphs and begin to ask yourself some important questions about who and why your supporting for President who you are?
REALLY?
You know I've had people tell me plainly with a straight face: "I hope you win your Case at the United States Supreme Court. I'm praying you do.", and in the next sentence say, "I've already committed my support to another Candidate for President".
Had people tell me, "I hope you win your Case. Pray to God you win! How do I support your SCOTUS Case alone, but not support you as a Candidate for President?"
So let's get this straight? Your sincere prayers and hopes are for me to win my Case which has been fought for like six years with the intent of upholding the foundation and central key of our Constitution in the Office of the President's requirement for a 'natural born Citizen'-[Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but your $$$ is being sent to another Candidate for President? (smile)
Its kind of easy to see God up in Heaven scratching his head thinking, "Gosh, I have such a big pile of Treasure up here in Heaven coming in the way of Prayers and Hope for Cody's Case in the United States Supreme Court. Look at that big Pile of Hope and Prayers! What's happening with his Campaign's Bank Account? About 30 Contributions totaling a little over a $1,000. What should we do? Hummm... How much is in Rubio's Campaign Bank Account? How much is in Cruz's Campaign's Bank Account? How much is in Jindal's Campaign Bank Account? How much is in all of the other Candidates Campaign bank accounts including all Candidates on both sides of the isle Republican and Democrat that Americans are supporting?"
Do you see what I mean? It makes no sense at all for you not to support with even a couple of dollars what you are hoping and praying for. That is why we need lessons on what is REAL.. and lessons in GETTING REAL. Now I do not presume to be the one to teach everyone a lesson. My hand would get tired slapping the snot out of everyone. (laugh) You know, I .. I really do love each and everyone of you. That love has been the overall empowering force of motivation for me to take this seemingly impossible stand.
Justice is never impossible and it is always probable. You know I keep thinking about an example that is famous around the world in everyone's mind, and how long it has lasted? The example is one of Pharaoh of Egypt hardening his heart against God through Moses until his family was wiped out, his entire army was wiped out, and until his entire kingdom was wiped out in the history books as one who fought against God. In the last days we are told there are some really disastrous plagues coming and we have to question the reasons for them being just like they were in the days of Pharaoh of Egypt.
Why do I bring that up. Well in the back of mind sometimes I have thought of my failures not as failures as much as a witness to all. This is where the RECORD in the United States Supreme Court is very important. For it is from the Records we will be judged. If a Witness Stands against you in the site of God, you can be sure you are in deep trouble and its really time to get your house in order.
If I am successful at what I am doing without your help, instead of because of your help, what will that tell you? You know I heard a really big compliment to the LGBT Community the other day that I think all Patriots should hear. That compliment, I will paraphrase somewhat was along the lines of , "It is a credit to the LGBT Community that they can organize a rally of 50,000 people in two days!" What credit is there for Patriots around the Country for the support of this very central issue of our Constitution, that everyone of them will stomp and spit fumes over, as FRAUD upon the office of the President with a known Case in the United States Supreme Court?
"Any Rally's going?", said one Supreme Court Justice to the other one sitting inside of his office. "Nope, all is clear". "Ahhh good, Let's put DENIED on that Motion".
WHAT I DID IN COURT TODAY
So failed two Tee attempts at getting the Court to Rule on the Case, I found one more alternative that would enable us, me and all of those lovely Patriots out there who have supported this action I'm thrilled with (you know who you are!),that really consist of three balls placed closely together while setting the ball your going to Tee off on on top of the three placed on the ground. To say the least, its Creative. Here it is, ALREADY delivered this morning at 11:02AM and signed for by W. Lee -SCOTUS- TRACKING NO. EK 55936063 US [MOTION/APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME] Find the entire document embedded at the bottom of this Post.
This MOTION/APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME is only 2 pages long and has 10 main points briefly establishing the Record and Reasons the Motion should be granted, but they are all very important. The last two in fact go into the harm the Court is actually doing in avoiding the PRINCIPLE during the last six months of this year and the dis-service that is to 46% of Americans.
What I really hope happens is that a Clerk runs into Justice Sotomayer's Office and says, " I have an extension of time Motion here and its legit. Will you sign here and grant it before you take off?" If that happens, she Grants it, she also Grants Certiorari and we can use the next three months taking care of B.I.O's so during the October-Dec quarter oral argument could happen and a decision could happen actually prior to our new election year of 2016. The next three months could be very important to preparing Briefs rather then just being wasted and taking a chance that the political doctrine question is used to encourage the Court to forget about it, whilst our Constitution is hijacked without due process or even a chance to discuss it.
If Justice Sotomayer actually gets the chance to read it, guess what? We have broke into the Justice's knowing about the Case for sure and we know it is not something that is being kept from them by the Clerks. This in and of itself could be a huge break through.I remind you I went through 3 levels of Clerks before getting to the one who deals with just the forma pauperis proceedings. Just getting the eye of the Justices as compared to the Clerks of the Court is a big deal
UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT
Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!
*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us
Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
It should be Noticed this is an unsigned rough draft of the original Document and the SCOTUS COPY reflects: "Gov. Bobby Jindal & Mr. Judy's original Signature. This has been done as a safety and authenticity measure which has become CRJ common practice DUE to misguided or malicious purposes".
Motion/Application for Time Extension Judy v. Obama 14-9396
No comments:
Post a Comment