THE PROBLEM- FOR COURTS & CONGRESS - OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT, FABRICATED, BIRTH CERTIFICATE - Should he be Rewarded?

Featured Editorial

The Post & Email

THE PROBLEM?

FOR COURTS &  CONGRESS -

OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT FABRICATION - 

Should he be Rewarded?

The following 9min 45sec VIDEO was posted 24 hours and has generated over 5K VIEWS  combining Obama's Last Press Conference highlights with the Cold Case Posse findings released by Sheriff Joe just the previous day. Not one Reporter in Obama's Final Press Conference asked Obama about the Fraud and Fabrication of his long form Birth Certificate now assessed forensically to be evidence of multiple criminal acts.

OBAMA'S LAST PRESS CONFERENCE BLOWS UP WITH BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

I was presently logged on during the original presentation of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Finale and the overwhelming public outrage that Obama would feed the Public a Fabricated, Fraudulent, Forged Birth Certificate was squalid. The public outrage and ire raised by a Usurper of the Office of the President has already made it's way to the Front Desk of multiple Elected Officials including U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.

Congress Receives Appeal to Hearings

The lines of morality are definitely being drawn and quartered on this one. Any Elected Official is being asked outright "Are you not condoning CRIME in the Office of the President absent HEARINGS on Obama's Birth Certificate? Do you condone Corruption in our Government?", as a tell of corruption for all Public Officials regardless of Political Party!

The wiggle room here for Politicians has considerably shrunk with the incredible revelations contained in the Video. It's a fair question to not only Congress but the Courts and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court who have failed twice to shed the light on the Criminal Acts associated with Obama's Fraudulent Forged Fabrication of a long form birth certificate.

People have a right to be upset when the information that's been fed to them suddenly comes to the climax and is found to be a nefarious screeching Lie. People are flabbergasted at Obama's audacity now more than ever! It far supersedes the public anger when Grubber announced Obamacare was passed based on the back of  non-transparency and Public Stupidity.

Do you remember all those JUDGES and JUSTICES that we now must assume were either fooled or associate accessories, co-calibrators? Maybe they are co-conspirators! Traitors to the Justice they have sworn to uphold? Oh! They may have an argument but so do those who are facing the Death Penalty as Traitors to the United States of America before the bullet impacts their head or the Death Penalty Gas hits their lungs.

These BASTARDS of American Justice, Truth, and Honor have dared say their hands are clean?
Why don't they just put up signs in front of the Court Houses that say CRIME WELCOME HERE?
They weren't just told once or twice, they were told over and over and over again? They were pleaded with. Absolutely pleaded with as the Official Legal Records testify of. United States Supreme Court Cases 12-5276 and 14-6396 are testimonies of Record with the information of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse begging the Court's for Justice and Investigation with Court Judicial Powers. Why would they not hear? Now all we can do is assume they are Traitors and Co-Conspirators of Crime?

"I went back to Court Year after Year after Year", says Cody Robert Judy, the only Presidential Candidate in the nation who sued both Republicans and Democrats for running Candidates who were not Born in the United States to Citizen Parents [natural born Citizens] the qualification unique to the Office of President and Vice President. (McCain & Obama)

"The main stream media or Press just would not cover this Crime and the Criminal Acts associated with it in defrauding the people and the Elections of 2008 and 2012 or if a lower Court had ruled he was ineligible and it sent the burden of the Defendant to the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama has been rewarded for Crime, there is no other way to look at this! No one would have voted for Obama if he had been declared ineligible by the U.S. Supreme Court. We do not live in a pure Democracy where an 8 year old can be voted for President if the majority of the Public Votes for him/her. We have guidelines outlined by the Constitution which is what makes us a Constitution Republic."

THE EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ON THE COMMUNITIES

 There are many ways to look at Obama's Audacity but the criminal audacity is one least looked at, but it is causing a really big problem in our Country which reminds us a good example has twice the value of good advice.

Obama has presided over a great crime wave of corruption that not only extends into Government but is being heaped upon the people from all kinds of different angles even as he strides to hide it.
For example:
When Law Enforcement Agents see and know what Publicly Elected Officials like Obama with is Forged Fabricated Identification have got away with , how much more do you think goes into their thinking about what they can and cannot get away with when it comes to Public Actions?
Was there a Black Lives Matter Movement before 2012? This movement sprang up with the prejudice the public saw in law enforcement which goes directly to Obama as the person in the Executive Branch's Chief Chair. The people murdered in Benghazi 9/11-2012 got Hearings in Congress as did 9/11/2001. In fact Congress held more hearings on Benghazi and then on 9/11, but not one on Obama's Fabricated Forged Birth Certificate. Can we ask ourselves Why? Do you know that Republicans had more Candidates running who are not [natural born Citizens ] (ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) than Democrats? Could that be the reason?

Sheriff Joe said it very clearly. If Congress can hold hearings on under inflated footballs or call Hearings together within a week which questions the FBI Director in an investigation on Hillary's Private Email Server, why on God's green Earth can they not conduct Hearings on Obama's Fraudulent Fabrication he has told 325M Americans was a copy of an Original Document?

From Brietbart we see Obama has been fudging on statistics Reporting the Crime his Example is contributing towards

[Despite political pressure, the FBI has openly admitted the 2015 crime spike, while —so far — keeping silent on the 2016 casualties. In its January 2016 report, the FBI said;

All of the offenses in the violent crime category—murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape (revised definition), rape (legacy definition), aggravated assault, and robbery—showed increases when data from the first six months of 2015 were compared with data from the first six months of 2014.

The 2015 increases were also seen in rape, murder, assaults and robberies;

The number of rapes (legacy definition) increased 9.6 percent, the number of murders increased 6.2 percent, aggravated assaults increased 2.3 percent, the number of rapes (revised definition) rose 1.1 percent, and robbery offenses were up 0.3 percent.

More than a decade ago, in 2004, 248 people were murdered in Dallas. For multiple reasons, the murder rate dropped step-by-step down to 113 dead in 2013.

But the murder rate then jumped almost 17 percent in 2015, bring the death toll up to 136 dead for 2015. It has also jumped by almost 90 percent during the first five months of 2016, putting the city on track for a 100 percent jump in murders from 2014 to 2016, even as Obama described it as a model city for using the new police techniques he’s pushing on the rest of the country.]

The Example of Obama is "Look what I can get away with because the People are so stupid and dumb." Look at what Hillary Clinton got away with Usurping the Secretary of State office with her private email server no doubt with Obama blessing it all the way with his pseudonym recorded in email exchanges with her? Any Espionage Charge now has The Clinton Defense Precedent- to heck with the Nations National Security!

If your apposed to Dirty Cops shouldn't you also be as fervently apposed to Dirty Politicians and Judges? If you stand for Law and Order and want your streets, communities, and tax dollars used responsibly shouldn't your TRUST be awarded to those who have stood up for what you wanted?

OBAMA'S EXAMPLE OF CRIME AND CORRUPTION GOT DEMOCRATS 

"CROOKED HILLARY"

Can you believe it's been a year since the last #DemocraticParty Debate? Looking back there's no doubt the #DEMS #DNC were in the process of a coronation rather than respecting and cultivating a meaningful Primary between Candidates. They marginalized castigated and exclusivized. In that corruption, while popularized in some big cities, it was a BIG turnoff for the Countries #ElectoralCollege which finalizes it's VOTE today for R- President Elect Donald J. Trump.

 It's sad now also with Barack Obama's #BirthCertificate being proven a Forgery that the Candidate who was indeed telling the Democrats they were making a Giant mistake and pleading in the U.S. Supreme Court this whole time 12-5276 & 14-9396 was ( myself) Cody Robert Judy, a Democrat rejected for fighting for the Truth and Losing.

Hillary's Foreign Contributions were outlandish and repugnant in the influence of the 2016 Election. Cody elaborated here on Obama's forged Birth Certificate and the lessons we are to learn?

The scheduling of the event on a Saturday is a
deliberate attempt by the Democratic National Committee
to drive down viewership and help Hillary Clinton.

[What's the lesson here? Anyone? If Truth prevails, Justice rolls but rolls around slowly, and it hasn't rolled around yet?

Yes, It's coming! There will yet be a Day where Truth and Justice prevails and I will be on that Team. Am I to regret Taking A Stand for Truth? Will Justice be shamed by my presents in her company? Heaven forbid!

There is no Political Party pitted against Truth and Justice that will stand the Test of Time. That corruption shall have the LIGHT shown on it and the works of darkness shall be known. Hell is here, at the Doors, the Price is Demanded. And those who thought the Lie was Greater than the Truth, shall be consumed away in their own Corruption.

No.. no... I am embellished with Gratitude for the Truth I have stood up for and which my Record has Masterfully Testified and added to my Resume. History though charred by the devil shall not forget her Sweet Truth. And yet in just a little while the Light Cometh and the shadows shall flee and disappear in a Great Jubilee! For Truth and Justice are the Delight of Angels and Sweet Souls bask in the cake of their Wedding!

I am joined in the company by the Noble of the Earth and twas not corruption which signed my invitation but was Enlightenment. God has Mercy upon the Meek who with Boldness have carried the Standard of Truth and Justice. I would rather lose Every Election than sacrifice the Sweetness of Winning Correctly rather than in Corruption. I've never been in it just to win it 4 years. I've been in it for the work of winning which Last 1,000 times longer. Our losses are our greatest Teachers on how to succeed. The field must be tried and tested True, then our Best Game can be played!

The worst example can indeed be the best example of Law and Order but not with positive incentives to continue or shuffle off or cover up. Indeed we have a penal system where negative behaviors are punished. The good example that could come from the 'Bad Example' of Obama's Birth Certificate would be for Congress to suspend any pension from the Office of the Presidency to Obama. You certainly don't want to continue to pay the guy for the Crimes represented in handing out a fabricated birth certificate, now do you? Obama should be stripped of any recognition of being the President of the United States and History should record it as the greatest Fraud ever perpetrated upon the American People!]

More News
Alex Jones Interviews Zullo and Sheriff Joe as Reported by The Post & Email

CRJ
Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you
http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA INELIGIBILITY in U.S. Supreme Court- Creates "He Did It" Triangle Finally U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396 - Birtherism Revamped by 2016 Pres. Candidates?

BREAKING NEWS:

_____________________

 OBAMA INELIGIBILITY in U.S. Supreme Court 

Creates "He Did It" Triangle 

Finally U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396

How will 2016 Pres Candidates REVAMP Birtherism National Security Question?

_________________________

FEATURED EDITORIAL THE POST & EMAIL

The call for PRINCIPLE might be the last one a person would expect to be heard as a pinnacle for employment, jobs, and security but that is exactly what Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy has been fighting for in challenging first McCain in 2008 then including Obama and continuing the challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court Ballot Challenges of 2012 - Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and now the Civil Rights Federal Law Suit of Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

"Most people do not connect the dots", Cody said , "But they should. It is an easy line to trace. Principles of Trust, Honor, Respect, Loyalty, Honesty, Integrity, Love, even Courage are associated principles that an Employer would certainly think were important for their Employee in hiring someone for a job. Why would people think that those Principles were somehow not associated with the creation of Jobs, the number of jobs, the quality of jobs, the whole job market?

"When you are seen Taking A Stand for Principle, it is not always popular or successful at first but there are few things about Principle you will ever regret in life."

Taking a piece of clothe from the stand Cody has taken for in the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 and you will find just how important that Principle is.

When you start adding up the damages of Obamacare, ObamaAmnesty, and all of the Obama Scandals we have endured including Benghazi, Fast & Furious, IRS Profiling, and Citizen Surveillance you start to see a picture that is formed that has cost America's Elections, Trillions of National Debt Dollars, Millions of Jobs, and last but certainly not least the Lives of some very fine people.

Principles are interwoven in Character and are not necessarily reflected in reputation as quite often that is 'Framed' by those in powerful positions, with great monetary- media influence and motivation that is not reflective of Principles. This is the reason quite often that what should be popular is not, and that which is more important is lost in the traffic of a crowded freeway.

That is just one reason that the Main Stream Media has been quick to characterize Birtherism as a Pejorative rather than a Principle. They have been quick to cover its pit-falls rather than its potential. We saw for example a lot of National Coverage when the Same-Sex Marriage Equality of Citizenship cases were being lost at the State Level and appealed all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Reporters took notice of the Court Records and wrote stories of every appeal. People took Notice of these stories, of the Issue because the Media was Reporting it: "Oh.. we'll see this Appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court!"

 That same fervor of Principle has not been the call for the qualifications of the Office of the President accept when someone was trying to 'change' the Principle that has lasted through many generations, and in ours has endured 8 attempts in change just since 2003 in Congress. All of these attempts failed. These failures to change the [natural born Citizen] clause from [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] have reflected a Legislative Mandate. That is suppose to be what the Judicial Branch upholds as what we would call a Principle of the Constitution.

While the Judicial Branch has been a bullish on the Standing Principle which regulates the challenges of pointing a finger at someone who is not qualified as a [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President in the interest of our National Security to someone in the Presidential Race as a Candidate against another, they have been a bear when it comes to actually HEARING the claim brought to them by a Presidential Candidate on the merits.

 Its never happened in the U.S. Supreme Court before- One Candidate for President using the Constitution to declare damages and another Candidate ineligible. Never in all of our History! There is no precedent case close to the purposes of the Presidential Qualification Clause of our Constitution. The nearest cases make stretches like Minor v. Happersett and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark but these at best discussed voting rights and citizenship and did not focus on the [natural born Citizen] clause for the Office of President and Vice President. You would think Judy v. Obama 14-9396 was a Justices' prize case..but thus far they have treated it like a slave unremarkable and inconsequential to the millions of dollars pouring into campaigns as well as the voting public depressed with Justice.

One of the things that is undeniable in politics is when a Principle is established, the Candidates gravitate towards its popularity in order to be elected. There is no doubt that the Media has not given any credibility to Judy v. Obama 14-9396. They have not covered the story of Principle. The U.S. Supreme Court has not heard a Case on the merits either. WE the PEOPLE are left with a chicken or the egg which one come first question.

Does the U.S. Supreme Court direct what is news, or does the news direct the U.S. Supreme Court and what cases they take as a popularity contest? One of the great establishments in our Country was created in the U.S. Supreme Court and the Justices of that Court being given 'LIFE TENURE' predicated of course on 'good behavior'.

The Theory posed that giving the Justices life tenure, would insulate them from drifting away from the Constitution based on the whims of popularity which might encompass even the population or politicians subject to re-election every two, four, or six years.  That is a great big fat BONUS for being in a U.S. Supreme Court Justice seat. You don't have to depend on re-election.

You can afford to act in ways stable towards the Constitution with a long look down the road for Vision. That responsibility is being called into question because the interest of the Presidential Election, its Candidates, and the Constitution are indeed in conflict with the qualification requirement of [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

In reviewing my argument a good look at the Comments highlighted in this Post will help. What this has left us with is kind of what started the whole thing in 2008. Its a Union of Republican and Democratic Party Elected leaders irresponsible to the Constitution and of course leaving out the Independents all together. That was demonstrated in three candidates in the U.S. Senate: Senators' Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain in U.S. Sen. Res. 511 that established a two parent Citizen ruling although it was non-binding in the Legislature, the "foreign birth place" was left out.  In other words it was not passed in the House or signed by a President.

We see now as a result a Triangular affect of, "He Did It", as Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal have Presidential Campaigns in the Republican Party Primary using Obama in the Oval Office not being qualified or "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" as a justification of their own ineligibility. In essence these Republican Candidates are hiding behind Obama's usurpation and calling it precedent which means they will use Obama as an example of why, if their qualifications are called into question, they should be allowed in the Office of President.  Its like a Bermuda Triangle where the qualifications for President disappear without a trace.

Doug Henwood's Newly Released Book

If my Case is not heard by the Court about the only scenario that could take place regaining a qualification foothold would be for instance: if Hillary Clinton got the Democratic Party Nomination, and lets' say one of the three, Rubio, Cruz, or Jindal got the Republican Nomination. Lets say in our scenario of the General Election Hillary Clinton lost to one of them. The question would then be raised, "Would Hillary Clinton care more about Obama's Legacy then her own as President standing up for the Constitution's Eligibility, [natural born Citizen] Requirement?

In other words, would Hillary Clinton be ready to throw Obama under her bus in order to gain a foothold into the White House against an elected Rubio, Cruz, or Jindal,- because she'd have to do just that?

In that circumstance, you'd see Hillary Clinton facing an elected Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, or Bobby Jindal in a much different way then you saw a Mitt Romney losing to a Barack Obama, especially because she lost in 2008. Democrats do not lose as long as the Constitution is there as a Civil Right and available to them. Why don't we ask Hillary Clinton Supporters if they would expect her to take a stand for the Constitution in such a scenario?

Yes,  she'd fire the weapon of the Constitution's [natural born Citizen] clause, and do so with a loaded or protected liberal Court system now too, and defer any previous attempts at defending it such as Cody Robert Judy's as simply not viable and unprofessional. In other words, not rich enough to procure the weight of Justice upon the question.

That flies in the face of "Justice for All", but how often in the world are the poor able to represent themselves adequately and fairly? Was that not one of the biggest reasons it was necessary for the United States of America to form in a Revolution against England's Royalty?

Every time the early American Colonies formed a Representation or Congress, that the King didn't like, he simply disbanded it and demanded new Representatives be chosen. After doing it repeatedly, it became clear, either it was the King's Way or the Highway. The interest of Justice cannot be underestimated in power or determination, but it is interesting how so many Republican Candidates rail against Obama and refuse to check themselves or others of their own Political Party as unqualified.

As so often repeated on this Blog, but serving as a staple, we must vote Principle over Party. This serves as the greatest jobs creator and boost to our economy that can possibly be mustered. If we refuse to do that, our Government will also be Void of Character and the principles associated with a Constitutional Character for We The People under the banner of our Freedom and Liberty in the U.S. Constitution.

HISTORY OF THE CASE

One Minute

In fact so neglected by the Media has D- 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy been through his 7 years and 14 Cases involving the Constitution's qualification requirement that he, after continually dipping into his own pocket in 2008 to finance Cases, fell below the poverty level and was forced to begin applying in forma pauperis or needing the Court to waive the fees of his Case in order for Justice to have a look at it.

It is not a story of leaching abuse like someone who could get a job but refused to because through that 7 years, Cody has indeed managed to pay his own bills, obligations, and self finance his campaigns for President in '08, '12, and now '16 as well as manage through the Court's sometimes difficult and arduous Appeal process.

 Cody has not been financed in the least degree or burdened the people with taxing contributions he used as his personal employment. Most adamantly to the contrary, this story has been one of silent sacrifice as one man felt the call and responsibility that came with STANDING and the unique obligation that rest upon a Presidential Candidate's shoulders as the only one the Court's could recognize as a legitimately damaged party to the Qualification for the Office of the President.

So the Case came to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 after the lower Federal District Court 'granted' the procedure without court fees, as did the Appellate Court of the 10th Circuit, at least hearing the Case, that Justice Sotomayor of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant the case to proceed in what Cody has called a #waronpoor.

The First Conference was held June 18th, 2015. The U.S. Supreme Court delayed hearing the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis from the cases entry of March 30,2015 a full 3 months. After Denying the Motion at the Conference, Cody scrambled to update the Court on up-to-the-minute financial declarations of both his personal poverty as well as his Campaigns poverty completely unable to manage what can range up to $4,300.00 in printing and filing fees.

A Second Conference of the U.S. Supreme Court was calendared for September 28th, which would be after a long and grueling Summer Recess. However, Cody submitted as a formality to the September 28th hearing already set up an Application for an extension of time understood as its own Case No. 15A25.

Staggeringly this was also DENIED by Justice Sotomayor during the Summer Recess of the Court July 7th,2015. The only positive thing out of that is it more-or-less placed Cody's case on an Active status as only Active Cases are considered during the Court's Summer Recess. Hope was held up for the September 28th Conference and the Application seen as a formality perhaps deemed unnecessary by the Court?

With no money for printing or filing fees, the Court through Justice Sotomayor who is responsible for all 10th Circuit Court Appeals, demanded if Cody's Case were to be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, that it be held to the strictest degree of compliance with the highest degree of printing and fees charged in a time period from June 22 to July 13th, 2015- just 22 days- roughly $4300.00.

With not a peep from the Main Stream Media of this arbitrary consideration towards Cody and his Presidential Campaign, not to mention the Principle of the Constitution upheld as a Legislative Mandate in Congress, the fees and printing charges required by  Justice Sotomayor just were not raised at all, and certainly not raised within the 22 day time frame. If the Main Stream Media had covered it there is no doubt that it would have been raised.

October 5th, 2015 Justice Sotomayor again denied the Reconsideration at the September 28th, 2015 Second Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Consumed with the pressures of keeping the Presidential Campaign afloat, Cody had lapsed behind two months on nearly all his own bills including rent, phone, internet, electricity, and even food. He was forced to regroup and dive into bringing up his own personal bills that had compassed facing eviction, and cut-off dates for his personal Internet, phone, electricity, and rent payments as well those of his Campaigns and with no contributions coming in for help. His computer blew out and he was regulated to the Library for his Campaign updates and contacts.

As is Cody's style, he doubled down and pulled everything out of the hole that had been dug during the Summer Recess, the incessant delays by the U.S. Supreme Court and the injustice he felt being dished out. Of course being dismissed due to a lack of funds is a little embarrassing- Kind of like your card being declined after the Checker has rung your food up and there's a line behind you of impatient people waiting to get checked out and your having to pick items that you want deducted to get the total down to what you can afford and your debit card will work for.

To say Cody doesn't understand the hardships America is going through now in much greater and minute detail is like saying the bear doesn't like honey. He understands the hardships and is living them. A man of the people and among the people .. a friend of the people not many understand to any degree that is and has been demonstrated for the seven years Cody has been a Presidential Candidate.

Its interesting so often the Main Stream Media picks on people who are rich, affluent, or wealthy as disconnected from the People. Like for instance Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush and their great amass of fortune.. did we mention Hillary Clinton? Of course!

However, truly they are not interested in someone who is REALLY down at the People's level suffering the same as the people -cooking his own food- driving his own car-and even doing his own laundry at the laundry mat while he continually finances his own Campaign, does his own Legal Research, writes his own Court Papers, and manages his own business just enough to stay afloat.

The sacrifices for Principle are still in Cody's mind, things that he will never regret. They are sacrifices born out of Great Love. Love for his Country, Love for his fellow man, love for his family and the world our children will inherit. Love and concern about all of our Freedom's and Liberties that provide good paying jobs and an equality of opportunity.

ONE LAST SHOT

BREAKING NEWS IN JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 

"As I thought about the loss and dismissal by Justice Sotomayor, I just couldn't help but consider the very real possibility that she was hiding my Case from the other Justices. Its entirely possible.", said Cody. "I just could not let this go and felt inspired to give it one last shot."

 "Noticing the fact the Court had not DOCKETED my Application for a Stay on Sotomayor's Decision in her denial for extension of time, I wrote out a Motion for her and Justice Kagan's Recusal based on their perhaps feeling more indebted for Obama's nominating them, then for him as a Respondent in my case on his ineligibility, which could possibly put their own nominations and confirmations at risk.

If Obama, the Respondent/Defendant in my case in the U.S. Supreme Court was found ineligible by the U.S. Supreme Court, his signature is made moot which affects a lot of things, including the Iran Deal, Obamacare, his Nominations for the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the Budget for the next two years that included an $85 Billion Dollar increase on top of a $19 Trillion Dollar Deficit - 10 Trillion granted on Obama's watch- more than president's combined from George Washington to George W. Bush. This was the ObamaNation and our Nation is in great peril of desolation!

I also asked for a FULL REVIEW by the entire U.S. Supreme Court because if this was the new normal all the Justices had declared a #WarOnThePoor of our Nation. I needed to know if it was localized to Sotomayor or the Whole Court. The following three documents have been confirmed as received by the U.S. Supreme Court.

COVER LETTER TO COURT CLERK

  ClerkCVR M2RecuseSotomayor/Petition4FullReview

MOTION TO RECUSE JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND KAGAN

  Motion to Recuse Justice Sotomayor ie. Judy v. Obama 14-9396

PETITION FOR REHEARING FULL REVIEW

  Petition for Rehearing FULL REVIEW

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDING

The following three documents were sent the same time. I have not told anyone about these documents thinking that the Court should at least receive the legal documents and have a chance to contemplate the action. docket them,  and perhaps contemplate the Court's own action to them in being very clear.

 If there is a #WarOnThePoor , let them have every opportunity to deny it. To dispel it in front of the whole Nation. That is at least Fair before we call them all politically corrupt and morally bankrupt. By following the rules, let them become the law breakers. By being lawful, they become unlawful. By exhibiting 'good behavior', they become the one exhibiting 'bad behavior'.

We've got to get America Back on Track! Like a Train running full steam off the track, rather then wait for a total derailment, we have got to slide her gently back on track, provide jobs, equalize the unfair trade imbalance and start caring for those inside America before we worry about those outside. Its a balancing act we have got to get a handle on, just like I had to pause on my Campaign and get my own bills caught back up.

America has been a great land of opportunity. She's been a Leader to the world and is seen as a Leader. She has grown in stature as well as status based on the Principles of our Constitution that afforded our population an umbrella of rights and privileges as Citizens under our Supreme Law of the Land. Without the protections of that, we will not be able to provide in our weakness what we have provided in our strength or strongest times. The world will not be a better place because of it.

It follows to make the world better, America must get better. This is my Campaign Theme- CRJ Today, for a Better America Tomorrow. What that means is by the Principles I have taken a Stand for America can and will get better and will provide for our future generations all we have come to be able to enjoy.

I ask you once again, and one more time, in this last ditch effort, to pass it on. Let everyone at least know that we have done all we could do. We have not shirked from our duty, nor has our Love for God and Country diminished. We have taken the baton and run our mile with courage and dignity establishing our Honor rather then demanding it.

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

BREAKING REPORT: GOP AND DNC COMPETITION TO DISPARAGE RELIGION - Americans Bucking Establishments

BREAKING NEWS

The GOP AND DNC COMPETITION 

DISPARAGE RELIGION

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE implicated in libel

 of Presidential Candidate to cover OBAMA/CLINTON?

Featured Editorial - The Post & Email

In a recent article Presidential Candidate and Dr. Ben Carson was excoriated for insinuating he did not think a Muslim was fit to be President Reported by Tamron Hall and Hallie Jackson reporting about their own  NBC's Chuck Todd in a Meet the Press interview with Dr. Carson. The controversial comment was stated to be another distraction for the GOP  Republican Party by NBC in the consideration of how much a Candidates Faith should matter to voters.  

The Press ran to the U.S. Constitution over the matter citing Article 6 "but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States". Dr Carson was insinuating He did not think Islam was consistent as a religion in America defined by the Constitution stating, "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this Nation", but he also said voting for a Congressmen who was Muslim was different and tried to clarify his position stating what policies someone supports as the basis for his consideration.

We have hardly had break between Dr. Carson stating that Prison made people gay and his apology for that on the front cover of Time Magazine.

NBC's Chuck Todd continued with the near litmus test of the Media to GOP Candidates, "Do you believe President Obama was born in America and is a Christian?", which is near a contradiction of what the advocacy of the Constitution in Article Six states that it should not matter. So Why did it matter to Chuck Todd in the Order of asking Ben Carson about Barack Obama? Dr. Carson said he had no reason to disbelieve what Obama said.

So what has Obama said about the fact that he was a Muslim that contradicts what Mr. Carson says in that he had no reason to believe Obama was a Muslim? There seems really just as many reasons for Obama to be considered a Muslim as there is that he is considered a Christian by Obama's own words, registration of record in school, if you take all of his words as the truth.

 It is therefore easily understood that confusion exist when it comes to Obama by many including his notorious framing of the anti-Muslim video tape as the reasons inciting the terrorist attacks at Benghazi, and in the fact acting as the air-force support for the Muslim Brotherhood who took control of Libya after Omar Qaddafi was killed, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, arming ISIS militants through Qatar and even now accused by Russia of supporting and arming radical ISIS or jihad fighters that has caused the horrendous immigrant problems cascading over the Nations of the world now.

In another Report -[The latest ISIS offensive has been made possible by a massive infusion of US weapons. Prime Minister Abadi admitted Monday that the Islamist captured some 2,300 armored Humvees- worth over one billion dollars - when it routed Iraqi security forces in Mosul nearly a year ago. In a Reuters column Tuesday in Iraq reported that, in addition 40 M1A2 main battle tanks as well as vast quantities of 'small arms and ammunition, including 74,000 machine guns, and as many as 52 M198 howitzer moil gun systems' fell into the hands of of Islamist militia.]

Chuck Todd insinuated again to Dr. Carson that a questioner to Mr. Donald Trump advocated Obama was not a Christian but was a Muslim, and it seems if we take into considerations 'policies advocated' by Mr. Carson as consideration, more truth exist if we consider the support the Obama Administration has given to Muslims in the Arab Springs diabolical divide and conquer strategy set up to ultimately arm Muslims of both Sunni and Shia extremes divided over Muhammad's successor : being his father-in-law (Sunni) or son-in-law (shia) respectively.

One question to consider- is the the media itself trying to advocate Constitutional Principles or just simply acting in a division in order to conquer? Does or is the media representing to the Public the great constitutional character of the Democratic Party by illustrating the GOP as unconstitutional when it comes to religion by showcasing exhibits of Trump and Carson but denying or not showcasing what is going on at the exact same time by the DNC in their own Party and battle of Presidential Candidates? 

Is there any contribution by the DNC of this 'slander of religion' or are they perfect in upholding a standard American's would be proud of? Is there a use or contribution by the DNC to frame the religion of a candidate just as harshly as the Media portrays the GOP of doing under leading Candidates Trump and Carson which might also be orchestrated as a fix in the competition considerations of Hillary Clinton, and even the present considerations currently in the U.S. Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 calling for damages upon the Campaigns of '08 and '12 suffered as a result of Obama not adhering to the qualifications insisted upon by the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President?

The GOP AND DNC COMPETITION TO DISPARAGE RELIGION

Consider this as every bit as a controversial distraction upon the DNC in the competition between Candidate Hillary Clinton and Cody Robert Judy and the use of "disparaging 'religion" as a political tool by the left. 

Under 'Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates'

Declared 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Business Owner Cody Robert Judy Cody Judy is the next great prophet of the Mormon church – in his opinion. He made a bomb threat related to that conviction and has served time in prison for it. Politically, he's a hardcore conservative who calls for minefields along the Mexican border, though he's running as a Democrat. More on Cody Robert Judy

http://politicks.org/Contact/

Contact Information

Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: (202) 863-8000
http://my.democrats.org/page/s/contact_issues

Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-863-8700
Fax: 202-863-8820
Email: Info@gop.com

When pressing the More on Cody Robert Judy the following appears:

[Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. He denies that any actual bomb threat was made, explaining that he merely referred aloud to the Book of Mormon (a holy text of Mormonism, considered by that faith to be part of the Holy Bible) by phonetically pronouncing its initials, BOM, which was misunderstood to the alarm of many. Records disagree with his account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a generally conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters. 

]

THE TUG-OF-WAR

The tug-of-war between the  DNC  Editorial Department writing the "Candidate Profiles" and Cody Robert Judy are certain. Objections by Cody Robert Judy in the detailed correspondence with the web site editorial staff can be viewed in greater detail on this CRJ Post Why Democrats are terrified to debate August 22nd, 2015. The distraction can be seen as a dispute of the facts of the case. Contrasting the DNC's editorial recommendations Cody submitted evidence and testimony that would consider the following to be true:

Cody Robert Judy, with no juvenile or prior criminal record whatsoever, 22 years ago court records reveal, was framed by LDS Church Leaders cooperating with the then LDS Bishop serving as District Court Judge of the Church/State. Frames of the video tape were released to the Press of the Incident. It seems the illegal union of church and state authority lied on their part in a plea-bargain to wash the whole thing down the tube with '6 months time served'. Court Records show Cody's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea three days later after the nefarious trap was understood were denied. He served 8 years in prison with 5 Rehearings. Many attempts were made to obtain the evidence of the video tape of the Marriott Center Incident. KTVX Channel 4  with their own lawyers spent $10K to obtain the video-tape they acclimated would make LDS Church Leaders heroes if nothing was amiss. Many witnesses attesting to what is referred to as a mob of upwards of 50 beating Mr. Judy after it was understood no threat existed, while the Church refused the evidence to Mr. Judy on his Appeals. Mr. Judy refused by his Criminal Court Judge/LDS Bishop the evidence, was forced to take the LDS Presidency to Court who maintained Copyright of the Videotape, and appealed clear to the U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Case No. 96-7655. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled 'not enough people suffered [n]ot getting evidence used against them' to hear the Civil Law Case.

Then Mr Judy advocated to the DNC Editorial web site:

[You might actually dis-guard the 'religious mess' altogether if you were to consider simply sticking to the details of Mr. Judy's political experience more might find relevant then a 22 year old case?

Mr. Judy's experience in the Political Fields includes a 2002 bid for 1st Congressional District of Utah where he was featured on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

He ran for U.S. Senate as a Democrat in 2004 and 2010 challenging the incumbent Republican Robert Bennett. In 2008 Mr. Judy ran as a write-in Candidate for President challenging Sen. McCain as eligible because he was not born in the U.S. serving the Federal Law Suit to McCain and the RNC 3 days before McCain was made the nominee. He included Sen. Obama in an Emergency Motion also before the election of 2008. The judge ruled the case was moot after delaying Judgement until after the 2008 Election saying Obama had won and McCain was a moot candidate to the qualifications.

In 2012 Mr. Judy began exhausting State Remedies before any of the Primaries or Caucuses. He started with executive branch Ballot Challenges in New Hampshire and Georgia which eventually were appealed into the Judicial Branches and worked up to each States Supreme Court ultimately leading to his first U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

Mr. Judy continued with a Review in 2013 rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, but remember this was of State Remedy Ballot Challenges. In July 2014 Mr. Judy filed a Federal Law Suit in the District of Utah, appealed to the 10th Circuit in Denver, and is now in the U.S. Supreme Court with a second Conference scheduled Sept. 28th, 2015.

CONTRASTING EDITORIAL VERSIONS OF THE CANDIDATES

To contrast this we bring in their version of Hillary Clinton's profile:

Declared 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Former U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Senator and First Lady Hillary Clinton Others' names have been spoken, but Hillary Rodham Clinton is still the current frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in 2016. As she takes her place in the public spotlight, it appears she's assumed the role, for her party and in history. More on Hillary Clinton

Clicking the 'More on Hillary Clinton link'

[Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is a woman who needs no lengthy introduction. Originally from Chicago, Illinois, she attended Wellesley College for a degree in Political Science, then went on to Yale Law School. It was during her schooling at Yale that she met her now-current husband and then-future President of the US, Bill Clinton. Although she was raised Republican and held to a right-wing political ideology for most of her academic career, she would ultimately change her views, and today has amassed an impressive resume of political accomplishments as a decidedly leftist liberal Democrat. This history – which includes her passive roles as First Lady of Arkansas and then of the United States, as well as active positions such as her two terms as a Senator for the state of New York and four years as US Secretary of State under President Obama – has led her to the present when, now a declared candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2016, she is easily the favorite in her party.

Clinton is well-known and generally liked amongst a large percentage of the American citizenry. With a serious chance at becoming the first female President in the nation's history, she has carefully nurtured her image for decades, with some believing she began planning an eventual White House run during her days as her husband's First Lady – if not earlier. Her intense preoccupation with always presenting herself favorably to the public (and, perhaps more cynically, her skill at playing the game of politics) has sometimes led her to bouts of questionable sincerity. 

Hillary Clinton announces 2016 presidential bid

For instance, she is known to have claimed that her parents named her in honor of Sir Edmund Hillary, an intrepid mountaineer famous for leading the first expedition to successfully climb Mount Everest. In reality, Edmund's life-defining accomplishment took place in 1953; while alive, he was unknown in 1947, when Hillary Clinton was born and presumably named.

In what had come to be regarded by many as a mere – but important – formality, Clinton officially announced her candidacy for President on April 12th, 2015. Now that she has declared, barring some major upset in American politics, she will almost certainly receive the Democratic presidential nomination. With her vast popularity across many sectors of the American electorate, especially among female voters, Clinton promises to be a formidable opponent for any prospective Republican challenger. Though she once enjoyed double-digit leads over some of the GOP's biggest names (numbers which have since ebbed), she still wields even standing to slight advantages over the best the Republican party has to offer. Of course, with a Democratic President on his way out in the 2016 elections and tides favoring Republicans, there are no sure bets, but any serious GOP contender would do well to train for battle against Hillary Clinton.]

Is there any mention of Hillary's Scandals? Any mention of Benghazi and the video tape she claimed was the reason for it happening when its' been proven that wasn't the case? Any mention of the gun-shot wound to the mouth of Vince Foster her law partner in Whitewater?Any mention of Email Gate? How about the pay-to-play scandal or any of the other 22 Scandals that are a lot more recent then 22 years ago in Hillary Clinton's DNC editorial review?

There's only a mention of her exaggerating where her name came from. We are lead to believe in her Candidate Profile, she has never even double dipped her potato-chip whilst in Mr. Judy's Profile rather than a "warning from God" traditionally acting as the love of God for those astray in Christian theology, in calls for repentance for those in the galls of bitter hypocrisy, as many also believe the Mormon Church Leaders, Mr. Judy was? What? Acting in accordance to his religious conscience as a member of an organization?

We don't even know anything else. He asked for no money, he asked for no demands but to have the Church leadership read an apology for treating him rudely which they are on record as having done refusing to see him the week before in a visit. For this they throw him in prison for a longer time than most cases of sever and habitual criminals?

Under the near same 10 minute circumstances of interruption Jorge Ramos interrupting Donald Trump would be doing 8 years in prison instead of being escorted out and let back in. Of course in a Church Meeting a greater latitude of freedom of speech is considered owning to the symbolism and allegories of parables so often used in religions. ie. The Rock referring to Peter. The Lamb referring to Jesus Christ. The Holy Ghost not meant as a demonized scary ghost and proper interpretation comes from being in perfect harmony with the Spirit which takes away fear, perceives truth, and interprets correctly. These of course to the true nature of the facts. 

This has got to be one of the greatest reasons America is so dog-gone-sick-and-tired of the Establishment ring leaders of both parties and why a record 42% of Americans now identify as Independents and its the fastest growing political movement in American now overtaking the population of Republicans and Democrats.

 It certainly explains why Mr. Trump, Mr. Carson, and Mrs, Fiorina who have never been elected before are indeed in the drivers seats of the GOP as Republicans are in a rebellion against the establishment. It certainly explains why a grumpy old Bernie Sanders with white wild hair considered an Independent from the ruling Democratic Party Establishment is the new Democratic Party front runner.

Americans can see right through the false reflections of the Media slashing and burning candidates over on the GOP side, and setting up little darlings on the DNC side like Obama who is not a 'natural born Citizen' ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. The exact same thing is occurring on both and its brought to us by the Establishment of both Parties. Americans are sick to death of pretending the Constitution does matter and then when it comes to this Candidate it doesn't matter. 

SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
 2ND CONFERENCE

One of the biggest discouragement's I see especially within the 'Conservative' Crowd is spotlighted in my Feature-Comment-of-the-Day referring to the U.S. Supreme Court as 'Stacked' against Conservatives. To that I disagree. What assumption does anyone really have that the liberal side of the Court is not just as dismayed at the likes of Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, who also are not 'natural born Citizens' ie. 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents?

The natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 as it pertains to the Office of the President is definitely not included in the aliens and national descriptions of Title 8 and was not made 'moot' by the 14th Amendment. While the Media might be asking was Obama born in the U.S. and is he a Christian, that is not the question the Court will be asking as it concerns the Constitution. We know there is no religious litmus test for any office in the Constitution, what is striking is that there is any question that 'natural born Citizen' is only granted in a second generation of Americans "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' and that can just as easily be lost if the time is interrupted by a foreign birth, or a foreign parent. Those do not remove 'Citizenship', but they can remove 'natural born Citizenship'. Let us not forget in the qualifications of the Office of the President it was Citizen at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, and 'natural born Citizen' thereafter. 

Why doesn't Chuck Todd from Meet The Press find a new 'Gotcha Question' like, "Do you think Obama is a 'natural born Citizen'? The answer is "NO!, and neither is Cruz, Rubio, Jindal or McCain" This is the center of our Constitution folks it has got to matter to you and as bad as serving 8 years in prison might seem to you, you have got to ask yourself the question: Why is Cody Robert Judy the only Presidential Candidate in American with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record standing up for the Core of our Constitution? Let's not forget, Jesus was considered a 'male-factor' by many of the Jews of his day.

We are reminded again only seven (7) days until the United States Supreme Court undertakes on September 28th, 2015 the Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Cody Robert Judy is CALLING ALL PATRIOTS and asking for their help in the preparation that is needed to support this Constitutional Defense. The United States Supreme Court needs to be the Supreme Court for the 46% of America also, and not just the smaller establishments of the 31% Democrats and 25% Republicans.

As a Final Thought let me say Americans are concerned. Owning the last 25 terrorist attacks in/on the USA it is difficult not to place radical Islamist Muslims as a common factor woven between them, though in comparison to the ratio of peacefully practicing religious people these are less concerning than car accidents.

It is the nature of many people to hold an animosity of different Faiths than they themselves hold. I believe that Dr. Carson understood that no religious litmus test should exist for any office defined in the Constitution, but like many policies that come in a general sweep of the entire population, mass punishment can be a very bad to entertain as a warrant.

Let us not forget it is the same road that would insist the entire America People be disarmed as a result of gun- violence. We have to be very careful, in treading upon a 'general policy', motivated by individuals that can and are held to account in our Criminal Justice System.

Thank You! 

Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016

CRJTwitter

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS