Will BIOMETRICS become necessary for America's National Defense?

Will BIOMETRICS 

become necessary for 

America's National Defense?

Are you ready for the BIOMETRIC CHIP because it's coming?

 
Did a little research project on this today and in a short time come up this.

TARGET AMERICANS

22 Trillion in debt and so many becoming dependent on: SNAP benefits cost $70.9 billion in fiscal year 2016 and supplied roughly 44.2 million Americans (14% of the population) with a monthly average of $125.51 per person in food assistance. The abuse of this is uncontrollable for Case Managers who only process. Federal housing renters assistance is becoming a huge budget crisis - Households with housing needs include low-income renters who either have one or more of the above problems or say they receive government housing assistance. That number increased a troubling 24 percent between 2005 and 2015 from 18.0 million to 22.3 million households. 

The Government 2019 shutdown exposed the March rent of 2.2 million Section 8 households would be left unpaid. Medical Payouts is exacerbating the well of Federal Funds The federal government spent nearly $1.1 trillion in fiscal year 2018. as well as FEMA $7.4 billion for FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund. $7.4 billion in Community Development Block Grant funding, which is administered through the Department of Housing and Urban Development. $450 million for the Small Business Administration's Disaster Loan Program. America is about 1 National Disaster Away on the tipping scale of default, especially with Interest Rates being held down so long that SUPER INFLATION is the death penalty and the call for a re-set is mandatory.

US military racing towards biometric identification for soldiers in the field - obviously this would help commanders know the exact whereabouts and condition of troupe in a field fight [or in the case of a soldier going rogue - ie Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl A US soldier captured by the Taliban for five years has pleaded guilty at a military court in North Carolina to desertion and misbehaviour before the enemy.
]Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl now faces the possibility of life imprisonment. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-27654454 ]
https://findbiometrics.com/us-army-new-biometric-identification-tech-503075/

[In 2015 Israel was set to be the first nation to be fully chipped “Every person who uses Facebook, or social networks, [they give] away biometric information. [When we tag] photos, we give away our locations, we give our biometric information to private companies and no one thinks it's a big deal. Several years ago, Israel unveiled plans to gather and collect biometric information on all of its citizens. Proposing that it wants to use the system to help “protect citizens” from identify theft and more, all citizens are being encouraged to get involved in the central biometric database. The pilot program asked citizens to voluntarily hand over a scan of their faces and fingerprints. Once the information scanned gets stored in the system, it would then become available to the military, police, and security forces, without them having to get a court order. The plan was to try out the program first and then to determine later whether or not it was going to become compulsory.] https://pressfortruth.ca/top-stories/israel-set-become-first-nation-be-fully-rfid-chipped/

2017 India is building a biometric database for 1.3 billion people — and enrollment is mandatoryhttps://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-india-database-2017-story.html

August 2018 [The chip, which is about the size of a grain of rice, allows the user to log into computers, buy food from the canteen or vending machines and access doors. All with the wave of a hand.
Wisconsin company now embedding microchip in its employees The chips are passive and do not require any batteries. Like other RFID chips they gain power from a RFID reader. McMullan’s chip for example also includes personal information about him to grant him access to certain areas as well as basic medical information.] Interesting though there's a glitch - [However, there is an obvious security risk with the new technology. Nick Anderson, an associate professor in public health sciences at the University of California, Davis, has highlighted concerns of people with readers trying to “sniff” out the chip and steal personal information.]

A RFID sniffer or skimmer is a device that can locate and read objects that contain RFID chips in them. They have been relatively easy to construct for quite a while now and are based on simple, off the shelf, readers easily available to anyone
http://www.planetbiometrics.com/article-details/i/7448/desc/wisconsin-company-now-embedding-microchip-in-its-employees/

The race in Politics has become socialism for both Parties Republican and Democrat. Whenever Socialism-Communism runs out of money it simply goes to war to cut the fat. The biometric ID simply made a choice to every person needing Federal Aid of any kind in the fields of Medical, Food, and perhaps even protection in War could easily establish this. Considering the abuse of the Sytem now days working Americans who are paying the taxes would most likely go for it also, as it does cut the ability to abuse or game the system.

Like anything, abuse can happen.

Obama's Crime & Corruption Enterprise IS Docketed in Federal Court - COLD CASE POSSE EVIDENCE IN THE HANDS OF THE FEDS

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email

~Obama's Crime & Corruption Enterprise IS Docketed in Federal Court ~

 COLD CASE POSSE EVIDENCE IN THE HANDS OF THE FEDS

Main Stream News Media is silent about a Case involving unseated defacto president Obama in what may be the biggest dereliction of Truth we have ever witnessed as a testament of Fake News in the media as a cover up of what is actually being represented in the Federal District Court.

This is what Federal District Court (Utah Division) case Judy v. Obama no. 1:2014cv00093 represents in a very Real Case with a very real Presidential Candidate, with a very real Sheriff Posse Investigation in a very real crime state or criminal enterprise and with very real Civil damages.

Note:See the New Motion filed below.

To help us understand what is going on we must have a basic knowledge at least of Complaints to the Court. We must understand that a Judge has the ability to maximize and minimize any lawful requirement by the Judiciary in it's own type of deferred prosecutorial judgement. I have seen Judges for example sign Orders on wholly False Affidavits, understand they were false see the evidence they were false, and refuse to rescind their Order. This is a manifestation of corruption in the Judicial Branch acceptable as the Public allows it without ramification.

Tort,[ in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong[1] that unfairly causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act, called a tortfeasor. Although crimes may be torts, the cause of legal action is not necessarily a crime, as the harm may be due to negligence which does not amount to criminal negligence. The victim of the harm can recover their loss as damages in a lawsuit. In order to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, commonly referred to as the injured party, must show that the actions or lack of action was the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is delict.]

"What we do not yet know is the degree of corruption involved in protecting Obama as an unseated Defacto President in the face of Forensic evidence brought forth by someone in the Presidential Race with Standing asserting the claims with professional legal lawful authorities evidence." - Cody Robert Judy - 3X U.S. Presidential Candidate

[Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries and may include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights. Torts comprise such varied topics as auto accidents, false imprisonment, defamation, product liability, copyright infringement, and environmental pollution (toxic torts). While many torts are the result of negligence, tort law also recognizes intentional torts, where a person has intentionally acted in a way that harms another, and in a few cases (particularly for product liability in the United States) “strict liability” which allows recovery without the need to demonstrate negligence.

Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.

55,000 + Hits in just a few weeks!

Obama's Last Press Conference BLOWS UP with Birth Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

Tort law is different from criminal law in that: (1) torts may result from negligent as well as intentional or criminal actions and (2) tort lawsuits have a lower burden of proof such as preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. Sometimes a plaintiff may prevail in a tort case even if the person who allegedly caused harm was acquitted in an earlier criminal trial. For example, O. J. Simpson was acquitted in criminal court of murder but later found liable for the tort of wrongful death.] 

We just read Constitution and Civil Rights in the Tort Definition

We also read Civil Cases do not have to be beyond doubt and have a lower burden of Proof.

We also know Congress has passed specific concerning Legislation about Cartels involved with two or more Corporations involved in illegal activity for their benefit we can construe as illegal actions and representations that harm others in the Clayton Act with specific penalties therein for infractions causing harm.

We also know you do not have to be a A.G to bring those to the Court.

 "With the Evidence unopposed by Obama ie and his attorneys , and they have not responded, the Court is put in a very different position with an unseated defacto President and the evidence presented by a lawful and legal authority "Cody Robert Judy - 3X U.S. Presidential Candidate

I include a partial comment from Obamaconspiracy.org which I made on this Post

[If there is no award the Court can give for damages or an accident which caused damages, then there is no Justice.

If Rules of a Race can be violated with only the Winners Reward being taken away, and the losers of the race still losing, then there is no race. . No game.

If the game like a football field has parameters and rules, just like a Presidential Contest Race, then we can apply those Rules and assess penalties.

I’m very familiar with the Scorn of the Judicial Branch represented and associated with many of my Cases.

Failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted , just happens to be a cool catch phrase to excuse wicked behavior as I’ve experienced. Won’t say all the time, but like any Principle it can be abused.

The abuse of it becomes very offensive. The penalty for the abuse of it is what? (Oh your never going to become a U.S Supreme Court Justice.
Guess what? Big Whoopi.. didn’t expect it.)

In Lance Armstrong’s Case, he was stripped of all Official Awards from the Time he started winning Tour de France Races. .. but interestingly enough, they did not award the Titles to second place finishers. http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-presidential-race-that-was-rigged.html?m=1

I’m reminded of a Law Suit I won in Prison suffering Maximum Security 23h/7 days a week lock down simply for refusing to cut my hair. I sued for a modest $10 per day which after 3 years added up.

The Judge with great Scorned nearly yelled at me in admitting I was right , there was unecessary discrimination between men and womens grooming codes in the standard of hair. The Judge said, ” You won .. you got your hair!!!”

The $10 per day Judge? That was a joke to him.

I was relieved for my fellow native American Indians who had suffered longer then I had. Yes, a Civil Right had been established.. even in Prison. It had been infringed, and suffered for greatly. It had been lawfully established.

The suffering was part of the establishing.

It’s a Civil Right to a Presidential Candidate to run a Fair Race with all of the requirements established declared in the U.S. Constitution serving as parameters of the Civil Right. Only Candidates have that Civil Right as it pertains to the Race for that Office.

Not being able to point to a single case of Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate in the claim of a rule violation in the Qualification specification of [ natural born Citizen] because there hasn’t been one, is indeed my problem. I related this to the 10th Circuit.

Duh! Just because no one had the crooked audacity to break that Rule , extend by Obama in some selfish scheme in an entitlement of the ego that rules did not apply to him , does not mean a Civil Rights Claim in violation was not established that can indeed be awarded in damages, it means the Judge’s had scorn and contempt, and pompous disrespect for the Constitution.

If a red car hits a blue car and it’s never happened before, is it any less an accident covered by insurance? The Judge’s in my Case say in other words, because it’s never happened before there is no Precedent Case to guide them.

It’s like officials under the cover or color of Law are God and can do ANYTHING. We know it is very very hard to question the logic of any person in the Office of President who can send off a drone and kill any of us now in the principle of the Bush Doctrine which also became a Precedent unheard of before.

My Sister said to me yesterday, ” Well, what does it matter now Code? ”

Why does Fraud, or Crime, or Cover Up of Crime matter? I guess when you suffer it all of a sudden it does matter.

Precedent Cases are Established that others don’t have to suffer. No Person in Prison or otherwise should be penalized for their looks. Now they aren’t.

It’s an interesting Conundrum.. Judges look for precedent Cases to establish Precedent as a credit to them, but so Few have the instinct for Precedent Cases.

It’s all the same, they are like robots and anyone comes a long to challenge their robot ways with something new? It’s never happened before we have no guide to defer to "Dismiss". . Or . . It’s all happened before nothing new can come along "Dismissed".

Well.., Trump became U.S. President, Tom Brady began a come back in the 3rd Quarter and Won a 5th unprecedentef Superbowl, while the NFL named Mat Ryan of the Atlanta Falcons League MVP just after the 1st half, but no QB in history has won 5 Superbowls!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/sport/2017/feb/04/matt-ryan-nfl-mvp-super-bowl-li-atlanta-falcons?client=ms-android-verizon

https://www.google.com/amp/people.com/sports/gisele-bundchen-lost-her-mind-when-tom-brady-won-his-5th-super-bowl-with-the-patriots/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

We have seen because of the Officials screwing up calls in the NFL a Mandate for Review on every Touchdown. And the ability for the other Team to challenge with the benefit of slow motion.

It’s Nature and the God of Nature saying you can say this or that based on your tiny particle of experience, but it does not make it so you Thick Skulled Idiots throwing temper tantrums when your wrong.

You have to Establish why your Complaint should be Opened up First. . Then , you establish the right to proceed. It was done.] End Quote

WHY DOES IT STILL MATTER

Most Americans just got done watching the Superbowl. How would they feel if the Superbowl was decided on an Error made by an Official referee? That is why slow Motion replays are now required on every Score of the Superbowl, and why the NFL has implemented the ability for a Team to throw a flag and request an Official Review on any play that they think might not have been called right.

You would think the Judicial Branch would be just as concerned when they see a piece of official evidence in an identification forgery that Obama handed out. Criminal Conduct has no statute of limitations like two four year terms in the the Office of President and while we cannot totally undo Obama's eight years in the Office we can still hold him accountable as well as setting a Precedent Penalty so that in the future Candidates have more of a Case History to Refer to in the hope of Justice when someone has the audacity to break the Rules and Regulations in our Constitution.

The Presidential Race is a contest of sorts also with Rules and Regulations outlined in our U.S. Constitution as for the qualification of Candidates. The Federal Election Commission or FEC is an organization set up by Congress to see that Candidates Register and to keep track of donations and contributions which also have rules and regulations that Candidates must follow.

We certainly want to congratulate what was an unprecedented Superbowl Performance by the Atlanta Falcons and the New England Patriots in one of the most exciting games in football history in a knuckle biting and unprecedented OVER TIME GAME!

The Atlanta Falcons may have lost the coin toss in the Over Time that gave the Patriots the first chance to score a touchdown, which they did winning the game, but the Falcons undoubtedly were part of one of the greatest games in American's memories now. Congratulations to Mr. Tom Brady for another unprecedented 5th Superbowl Win along with the rest of the New England Patriots players, coaches, and owners!

https://www.scribd.com/document/337654567/Cody-Robert-Judy-Motion-for-Relief-of-Judgement-Rule-60?secret_password=i7WZym3ksLujNIV0FLo3

  Cody Robert Judy Motion for Relief of Judgement (Rule 60) by Cody Robert Judy on Scribd

What do you think, let’s just say Obama as an unseated person now is found never to have been Eligible in the first place, would happen considering his honor, and the honor of his Signiture?

Do you think if Obama committed Fraud he should get away with it? Are you really advocating corruption in Elected Positions should be upheld?

Why would you not want a Court to adjudicate this?

Even the New York Times recognized that the U.S. Supreme Court was faulty at Hearing and upholding Minor v. Happersett in the face of the Obama's assault on Civil Rights.

CRJ

Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

      REWARDING FORGERY AWARDING FRAUD    

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANqhpkkVH8s&feature=youtu.be

The reason Cody wants you to understand that the Race for the Presidency is a really tough marathon race is because of the Standards of the Race that are defined in the U.S. Constitution have been something he specifically has stood up for with the standing that is represented by competitors in the Race. 

THE PROBLEM- FOR COURTS & CONGRESS - OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT, FABRICATED, BIRTH CERTIFICATE - Should he be Rewarded?

Featured Editorial

The Post & Email

THE PROBLEM?

FOR COURTS &  CONGRESS -

OBAMA'S FRAUDULENT FABRICATION - 

Should he be Rewarded?

The following 9min 45sec VIDEO was posted 24 hours and has generated over 5K VIEWS  combining Obama's Last Press Conference highlights with the Cold Case Posse findings released by Sheriff Joe just the previous day. Not one Reporter in Obama's Final Press Conference asked Obama about the Fraud and Fabrication of his long form Birth Certificate now assessed forensically to be evidence of multiple criminal acts.

OBAMA'S LAST PRESS CONFERENCE BLOWS UP WITH BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

I was presently logged on during the original presentation of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Finale and the overwhelming public outrage that Obama would feed the Public a Fabricated, Fraudulent, Forged Birth Certificate was squalid. The public outrage and ire raised by a Usurper of the Office of the President has already made it's way to the Front Desk of multiple Elected Officials including U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.

Congress Receives Appeal to Hearings

The lines of morality are definitely being drawn and quartered on this one. Any Elected Official is being asked outright "Are you not condoning CRIME in the Office of the President absent HEARINGS on Obama's Birth Certificate? Do you condone Corruption in our Government?", as a tell of corruption for all Public Officials regardless of Political Party!

The wiggle room here for Politicians has considerably shrunk with the incredible revelations contained in the Video. It's a fair question to not only Congress but the Courts and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court who have failed twice to shed the light on the Criminal Acts associated with Obama's Fraudulent Forged Fabrication of a long form birth certificate.

People have a right to be upset when the information that's been fed to them suddenly comes to the climax and is found to be a nefarious screeching Lie. People are flabbergasted at Obama's audacity now more than ever! It far supersedes the public anger when Grubber announced Obamacare was passed based on the back of  non-transparency and Public Stupidity.

Do you remember all those JUDGES and JUSTICES that we now must assume were either fooled or associate accessories, co-calibrators? Maybe they are co-conspirators! Traitors to the Justice they have sworn to uphold? Oh! They may have an argument but so do those who are facing the Death Penalty as Traitors to the United States of America before the bullet impacts their head or the Death Penalty Gas hits their lungs.

These BASTARDS of American Justice, Truth, and Honor have dared say their hands are clean?
Why don't they just put up signs in front of the Court Houses that say CRIME WELCOME HERE?
They weren't just told once or twice, they were told over and over and over again? They were pleaded with. Absolutely pleaded with as the Official Legal Records testify of. United States Supreme Court Cases 12-5276 and 14-6396 are testimonies of Record with the information of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse begging the Court's for Justice and Investigation with Court Judicial Powers. Why would they not hear? Now all we can do is assume they are Traitors and Co-Conspirators of Crime?

"I went back to Court Year after Year after Year", says Cody Robert Judy, the only Presidential Candidate in the nation who sued both Republicans and Democrats for running Candidates who were not Born in the United States to Citizen Parents [natural born Citizens] the qualification unique to the Office of President and Vice President. (McCain & Obama)

"The main stream media or Press just would not cover this Crime and the Criminal Acts associated with it in defrauding the people and the Elections of 2008 and 2012 or if a lower Court had ruled he was ineligible and it sent the burden of the Defendant to the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama has been rewarded for Crime, there is no other way to look at this! No one would have voted for Obama if he had been declared ineligible by the U.S. Supreme Court. We do not live in a pure Democracy where an 8 year old can be voted for President if the majority of the Public Votes for him/her. We have guidelines outlined by the Constitution which is what makes us a Constitution Republic."

THE EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ON THE COMMUNITIES

 There are many ways to look at Obama's Audacity but the criminal audacity is one least looked at, but it is causing a really big problem in our Country which reminds us a good example has twice the value of good advice.

Obama has presided over a great crime wave of corruption that not only extends into Government but is being heaped upon the people from all kinds of different angles even as he strides to hide it.
For example:
When Law Enforcement Agents see and know what Publicly Elected Officials like Obama with is Forged Fabricated Identification have got away with , how much more do you think goes into their thinking about what they can and cannot get away with when it comes to Public Actions?
Was there a Black Lives Matter Movement before 2012? This movement sprang up with the prejudice the public saw in law enforcement which goes directly to Obama as the person in the Executive Branch's Chief Chair. The people murdered in Benghazi 9/11-2012 got Hearings in Congress as did 9/11/2001. In fact Congress held more hearings on Benghazi and then on 9/11, but not one on Obama's Fabricated Forged Birth Certificate. Can we ask ourselves Why? Do you know that Republicans had more Candidates running who are not [natural born Citizens ] (ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) than Democrats? Could that be the reason?

Sheriff Joe said it very clearly. If Congress can hold hearings on under inflated footballs or call Hearings together within a week which questions the FBI Director in an investigation on Hillary's Private Email Server, why on God's green Earth can they not conduct Hearings on Obama's Fraudulent Fabrication he has told 325M Americans was a copy of an Original Document?

From Brietbart we see Obama has been fudging on statistics Reporting the Crime his Example is contributing towards

[Despite political pressure, the FBI has openly admitted the 2015 crime spike, while —so far — keeping silent on the 2016 casualties. In its January 2016 report, the FBI said;

All of the offenses in the violent crime category—murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape (revised definition), rape (legacy definition), aggravated assault, and robbery—showed increases when data from the first six months of 2015 were compared with data from the first six months of 2014.

The 2015 increases were also seen in rape, murder, assaults and robberies;

The number of rapes (legacy definition) increased 9.6 percent, the number of murders increased 6.2 percent, aggravated assaults increased 2.3 percent, the number of rapes (revised definition) rose 1.1 percent, and robbery offenses were up 0.3 percent.

More than a decade ago, in 2004, 248 people were murdered in Dallas. For multiple reasons, the murder rate dropped step-by-step down to 113 dead in 2013.

But the murder rate then jumped almost 17 percent in 2015, bring the death toll up to 136 dead for 2015. It has also jumped by almost 90 percent during the first five months of 2016, putting the city on track for a 100 percent jump in murders from 2014 to 2016, even as Obama described it as a model city for using the new police techniques he’s pushing on the rest of the country.]

The Example of Obama is "Look what I can get away with because the People are so stupid and dumb." Look at what Hillary Clinton got away with Usurping the Secretary of State office with her private email server no doubt with Obama blessing it all the way with his pseudonym recorded in email exchanges with her? Any Espionage Charge now has The Clinton Defense Precedent- to heck with the Nations National Security!

If your apposed to Dirty Cops shouldn't you also be as fervently apposed to Dirty Politicians and Judges? If you stand for Law and Order and want your streets, communities, and tax dollars used responsibly shouldn't your TRUST be awarded to those who have stood up for what you wanted?

OBAMA'S EXAMPLE OF CRIME AND CORRUPTION GOT DEMOCRATS 

"CROOKED HILLARY"

Can you believe it's been a year since the last #DemocraticParty Debate? Looking back there's no doubt the #DEMS #DNC were in the process of a coronation rather than respecting and cultivating a meaningful Primary between Candidates. They marginalized castigated and exclusivized. In that corruption, while popularized in some big cities, it was a BIG turnoff for the Countries #ElectoralCollege which finalizes it's VOTE today for R- President Elect Donald J. Trump.

 It's sad now also with Barack Obama's #BirthCertificate being proven a Forgery that the Candidate who was indeed telling the Democrats they were making a Giant mistake and pleading in the U.S. Supreme Court this whole time 12-5276 & 14-9396 was ( myself) Cody Robert Judy, a Democrat rejected for fighting for the Truth and Losing.

Hillary's Foreign Contributions were outlandish and repugnant in the influence of the 2016 Election. Cody elaborated here on Obama's forged Birth Certificate and the lessons we are to learn?

The scheduling of the event on a Saturday is a
deliberate attempt by the Democratic National Committee
to drive down viewership and help Hillary Clinton.

[What's the lesson here? Anyone? If Truth prevails, Justice rolls but rolls around slowly, and it hasn't rolled around yet?

Yes, It's coming! There will yet be a Day where Truth and Justice prevails and I will be on that Team. Am I to regret Taking A Stand for Truth? Will Justice be shamed by my presents in her company? Heaven forbid!

There is no Political Party pitted against Truth and Justice that will stand the Test of Time. That corruption shall have the LIGHT shown on it and the works of darkness shall be known. Hell is here, at the Doors, the Price is Demanded. And those who thought the Lie was Greater than the Truth, shall be consumed away in their own Corruption.

No.. no... I am embellished with Gratitude for the Truth I have stood up for and which my Record has Masterfully Testified and added to my Resume. History though charred by the devil shall not forget her Sweet Truth. And yet in just a little while the Light Cometh and the shadows shall flee and disappear in a Great Jubilee! For Truth and Justice are the Delight of Angels and Sweet Souls bask in the cake of their Wedding!

I am joined in the company by the Noble of the Earth and twas not corruption which signed my invitation but was Enlightenment. God has Mercy upon the Meek who with Boldness have carried the Standard of Truth and Justice. I would rather lose Every Election than sacrifice the Sweetness of Winning Correctly rather than in Corruption. I've never been in it just to win it 4 years. I've been in it for the work of winning which Last 1,000 times longer. Our losses are our greatest Teachers on how to succeed. The field must be tried and tested True, then our Best Game can be played!

The worst example can indeed be the best example of Law and Order but not with positive incentives to continue or shuffle off or cover up. Indeed we have a penal system where negative behaviors are punished. The good example that could come from the 'Bad Example' of Obama's Birth Certificate would be for Congress to suspend any pension from the Office of the Presidency to Obama. You certainly don't want to continue to pay the guy for the Crimes represented in handing out a fabricated birth certificate, now do you? Obama should be stripped of any recognition of being the President of the United States and History should record it as the greatest Fraud ever perpetrated upon the American People!]

More News
Alex Jones Interviews Zullo and Sheriff Joe as Reported by The Post & Email

CRJ
Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you
http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

BREAKING NEWS - U.S. SUPREME COURT INELIGIBILITY CASE- OBAMA TO RESIGN?

FEATURED EDITORIAL - The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - U.S. SUPREME COURT INELIGIBILITY CASE- OBAMA TO RESIGN?

Today on The Sean Hannity Show in a conversation Sean was having with his inside Washington DC correspondent Jamie Dupree, Sean stated that he was starting to think like Donald Trump, that perhaps it was a good idea if we insist Obama's College Transcripts be unsealed and opened. This of course was a swipe at Obama's Ineligibility which is now being entertained by The United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. The Court comes back from a break June 15th with a couple of key opinions to be released on Marriage and Obamacare, and will also decide whether to ask for further argument on the case that squarely places Obama,Cruz,Rubio, and Jindal's responsibility to the U.S. Constitution's qualification for a 'natural born Citizen' in its sites.

There is a big disagreement, and when referencing 'big' think of the division in the Grand Canyon type of Big, among the supporters of the Presidential Candidates as to whether the Supreme Law of the Land's demand for a 'natural born Citizen' for the Office of the President means much more than the qualifications of 'Citizen' for U.S Senators, U.S. Representatives. While "Citizen" is used in the paragraph of the Office of the President's Qualifications in a time determined way in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, referring to that qualification upon those 'born at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution', the paragraph goes on for those born after that time and states they must be 'natural born Citizens'.

The United States Supreme Court is being asked to define the term or what might be better stated as adhere to the term "natural born Citizen" with the litmus test of "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents by Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy in a contest of ineligibility directed at Obama for his Campaigns for President in 2008 and 2012. Cody has never conceded those races to Obama and is the only Candidate to have his objections now before Highest Court. Cody says to those continually discouraging him with "Its about time", that "Hey, getting to the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the same as making instant oatmeal. Instant Justice rarely exist and like a good wine, often cases require what's termed in the Court as a 'ripening'."


WHAT is DIFFERENT ABOUT CODY'S CASE FROM ALL THE OTHER ELIGIBILITY COMPLAINTS?

Cody rattles off many things that sets his Case apart from all the other cases that have also made their way to the U.S. Supreme Court but were not heard by the Court chief among them 'Standing','Party','Jurisdiction','Criminal Complaint','The Political Doctrine Question', 'Bi-Partisanship', Exhaustion of State Remedies', and 'Racism'. When you start going down that list it is much easier to comprehend why Cody's Case has cleared all of these hurdles and very well could be THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN HISTORICAL CASE OF OUR TIME in the name of Justice that doesn't get 'dead-listed'. Reference: Why Cody's Case is not DEAD LISTED

"This has been a very long journey", Cody said, "and its hard for people who have followed this rather spottily to grasp what is happening and how and why Obama could very easily not make it to the end of his second term before being asked to resign, or impeached for his disability of authority to administer the duties of the Office of the President based upon the People's Qualifications written in the U.S. Constitution that limit with strictness those able to wield the power of the sword and the pen in that office."

Nixon resigned the office of the President because he saw that if he didn't he was going to be indicted in a U.S. Senate Trial for what would amount to high crimes and misdemeanors charges. This was back in the day that Republicans controlled the White House but Democrat's controlled the U.S. Senate where trials of such nature take place. Cody's case however, does not ask the Court to remove Obama per se or intrinsically, but asks the Court to only consider that Cody in the Race both 2008, and 2012 against Obama be treated in fairness and equality to all under the same Standard. If Obama was allowed to run unfairly according to the rules, Cody is due a just compensations for the damages Obama caused.

Many cases brought to the Court did not even include Obama's name and instead cited the Secretaries of the differing individual States as the "Gate Keepers" of ineligible candidates as if they shouldered the responsibility. While running in the Democratic Party after the Primaries were over for instance and Cody was not chosen to represent that party, Cody would go right to those same Secretaries of State in the Elections Office and they would administer an oath to him which clarifies and certifies that a Candidate for Office should he/she be elected be able to qualify for that office. This puts the burden squarely on the Candidate for Office.

In Obama's case there is a document trail of his being bound to that oath, but there is also a document trail that brings into the equation Obama's enablers from the Democratic Party Leadership bench like Rep. Nancy Pelosi who signed in front of a Notary of Public [t]wo separate 'certification of qualification forms' in 2008. One for Hawaii that demanded that those so certified by a major party also be certified with an oath that they were qualified for the Office under the Constitution of the United States for that particular office. The other for the remaining 49 had no such language to adhere to and its quite a credit to Hawaii. So, what is a Secretary of State in an Election's office supposed to do with one person who lies and another person who backs the lie up? These secretaries of states are not independent Candidate investigation people. They mostly 'trust' that what they are being told is the truth, but in the Politics of Obama 'honor and trust' have been violated and Cody's Case brings all of this to light for the Court.

We know Obama was not acting alone, He had accomplices to his election identity fraud. As a Candidate for President Cody at first simply took Obama at his word when it came to Obama releasing his long form birth certificate at the end of April 2011 which he himself handed out to the White House Press Core in his famous announcement calling birthers 'side shows and carnival barkers'. Taking Obama at his word in his own press release, the document states Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, making it impossible for Obama to be a natural born Citizen- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for the office of the president. Obama's father introduces a foreign influence in Obama's history which was prohibited by the term 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President. Over time, it has proven that what was happening is that Obama was conducting a 'side show and was the biggest carnival barker' of all.
[Comment-of-the-Day]

Another aspect of Cody's case to the U.S. Supreme Court is unique in that Cody's case introduces to the Court under the authority of a little used term in a Congressional ACT the ability for someone other than an Attorney General to bring to the Court an allegation of crime. This Congressional Act is known as The Clayton Act which came out of The Sherman Act. These focus clearly on Corporations forming illegal alliances as Cartels in illegally determinations of precious resources, commodities, and services. Especially in Election Years, 'votes' are a highly valuable commodity and service to the Country. Candidates these days form Corporations to shield their private fortunes from liability. The two items form exactly the ingredient for an illegal cartel.

While nearly a dozen high profile stories have been written many highlighted on The Drudge Report about Sheriff Joe Arpaio's case in Arizona that revolves around the investigation of Judge Snow's Family allegations they had it out for seeing to it he was never elected again, and had the Sheriff himself on the witness stand, none cover the Cold Case Posse Report in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. What has not been reported, even by WND a stout encyclopedia of stories on Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse, their Report and findings that Obama's long form birth certificate was a fabrication and could not have possible come from an original copy of the Hawaii Health Records Department is that Cody's Case in the U.S. Supreme Court now highlights all of this. Indeed the tie between that Health Department and the Obama Administration coming in Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy has sadly and tragically ended with the loss of her life in a very suspicious death and that connection seems lost to the Media.

The Report of the Cold Case Posse originated by Sheriff Joe's assignment to investigate the identification fabrication, has been brought to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, by the authority vested by Congressional Acts to do just that. Obama's Selective Service Registration was also released by FOIA request and was a second witness that identification fabrication was in play as anomalies unfolded in that Report. These are just witnesses that Obama's whole story has been concocted and wasn't true to form. There were slips and mis-steps associated with the lie, and his selective service registration was just one other I.D. that had to be retraced or redacted because Obama as an Indonesian Citizen traveling to Pakistan on a visa at the time forbidden to Americans, was not required to sign up for the draft. The time of this redaction also ended badly for the witness Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who was assassinated in his car.

Obama had no other reason to oversee or fabricate a long form birth certificate other than to do a disservice to the place of his birth as a Candidate running because of the focus on "born" in natural born Citizen, even though anchor babies are not considered eligible for the Office of the President. This would easily avail the Office of the President open to foreign take over if all that was required was a birth in the United States. Of course the theory represents conspiracy in itself, but it is rather naive to think plans are not drawn up for the imaginations of the enemy or to just as naively think the enemy would not delight in being sworn into the Office of the President of the United States.

With the Cold Case Posse's investigation and REPORT in the U.S. Supreme Court now and Obama's very identity challenged as fraudulent, it seems quite relevant that the Obama Administration would go after Sheriff Joe's 'computer server'. That seems strange only in the light they don't seem to want Hillary Clinton's server while she was Secretary of State emailing what now have been detailed as classified by the FBI and redacted in parts for the Press as well as destroying what she decided to destroy while on duty as the Secretary of State for us.

Cody's Case in the U.S. Supreme Court details why the Court would not necessarily find a particular Candidate like Hillary Clinton interested in bringing a case to the court against Obama for his ineligibility, even though former President Bill Clinton is on 3-16-12 record from credible witness and filming documentary producer Vivian Bettino as stating they would do so at the proper time. This is also in front the U.S. Supreme Court in Cody Robert Judy's Case Judy v. Obama. 14-9396. The alliance between McCain, Obama, and H. Clinton was made in non-binding U.S. Senate Res. 511 which the U.S. Supreme Court is not bound to. 511 was not a Constitutional alteration of the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the qualifications of the Office of the President, although it does detail a source of the litmus test regarding 'parents' which case constitutes Cody's first compelling evidence that it doesn't matter where Obama was born if both his parents are not at the very least "Citizens". This highlights the compelling case Obama used the fabrications as distractions away from his ineligibility by his father's Kenyan Citizenship represented on his first released certification.

The two generation contract America has given to the Office of the President prohibited foreign influence by two generations this way. Congress's own investigations and hearings on the matter in 2002 bear out much of the same affect also noted in the case before the U.S. Supreme Court. It was Cody Robert Judy's law suit against Sen. John McCain in 2008 that included the Republican National Committee served just days before McCain was made the Republican Nominee at the Republican Headquarters of the Campaign and Party in Las Vegas, Nevada. This was precisely the same way in which Obama and the Democrats were served this Complaint almost a year ago now July 7th, 2014. Of course with an alliance of Candidates of those two parties no complaint is going to be made, however an alliance between parties that excludes the rest of the population of America is unconstitutional and troublesome especially given 43 % of Americans now are registered Independents according to a Gallup Poll conducted this year also noted to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case. Reference Viral Post.

With both Republicans and Democrats represented by U.S. Senate Resolution 511 that left for certain Independents out in the cold which now registers a majority of voters. That in and of itself should be a real red flag for the Court's Consideration as to the damages this type of behavior by career politicians is causing and gives prudent reason to set the case at the very least for oral argument. Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America over the 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections to call both Parties out on the carpet which as best as can be displayed is not racial or partisan, but is ruled more by Principle over Party. As you can see the Case before the U.S. Supreme Court is much more complicated than just stating Obama was not born here as the detractors like to label 'birthers'. Without laws that apply to all, justice for all is an impossibility, and certainly illegal discrimination's begin taking a foot hold.

Will you please help us prepare for the coming actions of the Court? We need your support in passing this on to your friends and your local press as a 'news tip'. Will you do that for us on your own? If you feel of course like this should be in fact reported because it affects your rights to vote for a Constitutionally Qualified Candidate! Please do not let your rights go unnoticed and unvoiced by just assuming the Media all understands what you now do. This is a complex case but the merits of it are very simple and sink to the root of the nucleus of our Republic. Please add your voice to this case by doing just that. Pass it on, and send it to your local news stations now as a news tip. Cody Robert Judy is working very hard for you as a Champion and we would like to thank you for the 235,000 views now!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI