Sunday, August 16, 2015

WHY MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATS ARE TERRIFIED TO DEBATE?

Cody Robert Judy -D- Candidate for U.S. President 2016 -
Only Candidate in U.S. History with Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the Defense of the U.S. Constitution's Qualification demand of 'natural born Citizen' ie born in U.S. to Citizen Parents
*See Update II  below September 21st, 2015
* SEE UPDATE BELOW: AUGUST 22,2015
WHY ARE MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AFRAID OF THE DEBATE?

Have you ever in your life seen Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates so completely terrified to debate? I mean the Republicans did trot 17 Candidates up on two debate stages August 6th three of which had never been elected, but at least had been given some coverage by the main stream media. Can that be said for the Democratic Party? The answer is "No-No-No!"

Will 2016 be turned in for the Democrats to be the new-age election where Candidates hunker down, batten down the hatches, avoid the press, avoid questions, pre-select questions, and pre-select living room audiences as Hillary Clinton has been allowed to do so far or will the Press start to "Candidately" admit this looks pretty darn rigged and crooked?

Edit Excerpt:
August 13th The Post & Email Editor-in-Chief Sharon Rondeau responding to Post run at BirtherReport of that ABC ran of little known Candidates actually had her Comment 'Removed' or 'deleted' by the Moderates of ABC which only reported a Case in the United States Supreme Court of Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Doesn't it seem odd to have a comment removed from a Newspaper editor-in-chief by ABC that simply reports a pending case in SCOTUS? This is sadly just more evidence that TRUTH is feared more than anything.

While Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates for the most part support Obama, there is one that has thought more of the Constitution then any particular Candidate. Is it a really part of an honorable Republican Platform not to have [a]ny of their mainstream Candidates having any Record at all of actually defending the U.S. Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen'? Is that something Republicans take pride in?

After Reading the Following Story entitled THE DEMOCRATS ARE TERRIFIED TO DEBATE, and being summoned in such as either a part of the "Parade of Losers" or "Kooks", I was left out of the "Crooks" account created for Hillary Clinton in the article. That is until, I clicked on the link of 'Democrat Nominees' of Course included in the story and found the most bias account I may have every read.

All tolled the 18 Democratic Candidates for President that I guess the Democrats don't want you to know about. While Republicans sported 17 Candidates in their first debate 3 of which have not been elected to office before in Trump, Fiorina, and Carson those three seem to be doing much better after the debate. Is it any surprise why the Democrats are actually afraid to let me see the light of day on a debate stage with Hillary Clinton-67, Martin O' Malley-52, and Bernie Sanders-73? I would be the only one still in my 4th Decade at 49?

Clicking on my Name- Cody Robert Judy I read the Editorialized version of Hell Associated with my name and emailed them a few corrections I do not think affords me any great latitude, bias, or their site with any bigotry.

The following Corrections might be appropriate for the Editorialized False information regarding my (Cody Robert Judy) 2016 Candidacy for President.

1) I'm not Mormon- The Church Excommunicated me in 1995 for 'apostasy'. That fact should be included because its not right to mis-represent the LDS Church with a nonfactual membership.

2) If you include that, it might give me some breathing room as the LDS Church and State are seen both punishing me. That at least combines the Church and State in a unlawful prosecution of my protest that is detailed in my book TAKING A STAND - The Conservative Independent Voice.
 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/taking-a-stand-cody-robert-judy/1021993097

3- The detail of 'Bomb threat' you included in your arm-chair quarterback position is false, unless you also include people confusing B.O.M (Book of Mormon) with the word bomb and realize the LDS Church copyrighted the whole incident. That video tape was introduced to the Judge by the A.G. , but was refused to me as the Judge , also a Mormon Bishop stated in Court 'We don't want 20/20 Barbara Walters getting it.". Releasing the video would also necessarily convicted many members of the LDS Church of brutal assaults and unnecessary, unrestrained, and violent behavior in a Church Meeting.

4) I really don't think any of this information is biased because it in fact represents the truth. If your willing to write the false narrative you did, why not try a shot at the truth? The official charge was 'aggravated burglary' the small print which says, "entering a building with the intent to commit a felony" although which felony is a mystery, and while its difficult to imagine a weapon the Mormon's use as a canonical text B.O.M, you really need to quit paying so much attention to 'Church owned newspapers' writing bomb, unless you'd like to endorse them for President?
The story of that is here:
 http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/02/fight-over-forgiveness-lds-church.html

5) Satire aside - My three Ropes Campaign Platform is here:
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/12/cody-robert-judy-presents-crjs-three.html

6) Now while your spotlighting Candidates for President, and mentioning the worst quite easily noticed, you might just for the laughs and giggles throw in the Best?

Cody Robert Judy is the ONLY candidate in U.S. History to have a bi-partisan Federal Court Record or Stand on defending the Constitution's demand or qualifications for President as a 'natural born Citizen' i.e., Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. His current case is also the longest lasting eligibility challenge in SCOTUS HISTORY and U.S. Case history. If its so 'dis-proven' why is it pending in the United States Supreme Court now? Isn't that a little risky on your part or at least 'placing a bet, gamble, or perhaps your own prophesy?

Ref: Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, NV. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61642

Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276 AND Judy v. Obama 14-9396 currently scheduled for its unprecedented 2nd Conference Sept 28th, 2015.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/14-9396.htm

You might want to read my defense of Planned Parenthood Special Report before you 'label me' strictly to the right on your last paragraph.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/a-special-report-sting-of-planned.html

I mean if you want your Site to look like a satire joke you can withhold hard facts. The problem with doing that is others began to look at your Site as just that. The choice is yours of course.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

Guess we'll see what if any changes are made?
[ Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a Mormon, and his religious beliefs have led him to questionable actions. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church), addressed an assembled crowd. Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter, claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy admitted to the crime and plead guilty, saying he had done it because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.]

UPDATED: AUGUST 22-2015
The following Changes were made to my introduction over at POLITICKS.ORG http://2016.democratic-candidates.org/ which we will Post along with my Considered answer found below:

[ Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.

Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. He denies that any actual bomb threat was made, explaining that he merely referred aloud to the Book of Mormon (a holy text of Mormonism, considered by that faith to be part of the Holy Bible) by phonetically pronouncing its initials, BOM, which was misunderstood to the alarm of many. Records disagree with his account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea. He served eight years in prison.

Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.

Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.

With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.]
MY RESPONSE: 
I want to sincerely "THANK YOU" for respectfully revising my editorialized account. I really appreciate all the time you guys put in. Without you many would not even see me as a candidate unless they headed over to the FEC. That's commendable. 

There is still two REALLY MAJOR BIG DEAL, as far as the TRUTH OF THE RECORD is concerned. The U.S. Supreme Court has a 2nd conference scheduled Sept 28th on Obama's INELIGIBILITY and if that goes forward than the 'presumption' that its been legally dealt with could really melt on you. 

So again, we are at an impasse with the account of the Record and the assumptions you have made that its settled. 

Just stating for the RECORD that Judy v. Obama et.al, 14-9396 is up for a SECOND conference Sept. 28th, 2015 is of course current and simply inclusive of the actual Court Record the U.S. Supreme Court is very much a part of TRUTH.

Your 'staunch conservatism' still labels me in the Pro-Life Category where the reference I gave you actually defending Planned Parenthood and my stand as Pro-Choice for Life disagrees in the politically correct arena. 

Why does it matter? Well, by simply stating 'staunchly conservatism' you alienate right away the BIG CHUNCK of D's who support Pro-Choice. I mean its a very big issue right now and there's not to many Candidates who have defended Planned Parenthood on the right side of conservatism right?

That is the truth if you can agree with that? Maybe you need to broaden your "label category" Just an idea? For instance, I call myself a "Conservative Independent Democrat" based on my 'conservatism towards the Constitution in my defense of the natural born Citizen clause outlining the qualifications for the office of President and Vice President, and liberal for freedom, liberty and choice.

I hope that is agreeably understood.
Cody Robert Judy

P.S. I am updating my Blog on this story, Regarding your Post and Link here.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/why-mainstream-democrats-are-terrified.html
I noticed that you put on Hillary Clinton's Introduction a Video of her Kick Off afforded on YouTube. I hope you will do the same for me? Here is the YouTube url and embedded code for your convenience. 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSXjDMq_X7o

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

UPDATED September 21st, 2015:
In your editorial regarding me I found for you some other testimonies perhaps you might take into consideration just to you know make your statement regarding my religion practices correct... I guess? It seems you have no problem condescending 'religious Faiths or practices', but ultimately it might be considered a case of libel.

You Write in your false narrative:
[(including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned]

Why would I ask Hunter to flee the building? That's so stupid to write.  There's no basis to it at all. I never asked Hunter to leave the building as you state in the synonymous 22 years ago. I asked him to read an apology statement from the Church for treating me so 'rude', which they had done. If your going to include something that happened 22 years ago, at least get it right?

These kinds of problems can be handled within a Church but when the State comes in and starts dictating what words mean in a church meeting, well then you have really lost the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution haven't you and everybody who believes in God is nuts. Maybe that's the way you want it to appear? If so, your a bigger enemy to the U.S. Constitution and a threat to it, then anyone right?

Statement 1: I was on the opposite side, about 30 rows up, but close enough to see the whole thing play out and hear his voice. I remember watching those valiant Elders of Israel dropping down behind the stands, circling, and then when some old dude rushed the podium with his hand raised, the mob pounced and old Cody Judy disappeared in the melee. It was crazy.

( The statement- some old dude rushed with his hands raised. Doesn't that sound like I was 'rushed' and assaulted?)

Statement 2:[Fascinating and sad. I had never known what happened after the initial report. Thanks for the link.
The fellow, Cody Judy, strikes me as a modern Samuel the Lamanites and his claims make a lot of sense in Mormon context - more than those of the current executive team. Plus he has the balls to back up his claim of divine authority:
"I have seen the resurrected Joseph Smith, Jesus Christ and ancient apostles. They have told me this is what I have to do," Judy said.]

( Here's a statement from an eyewitness that states very importantly within the context of the church what I was saying made sense, and was backed up within the Mormon context and by a religious understanding or context of authority.  "More so" this witness states then the current Leadership in his opinion. Samuel the Lamanite was a prophet sent to the people of ancient America to call them to repentance. They shot their bows and arrows at him but could not hit him. He delivered the message and left. Soon (32 years) in the B.O.M. (Book of Mormon) the people were indeed subject to the prophesies made by Samuel the Lamanite.)

Statement 3- [I was there, right behind the stage, about 25 rows up. Great view, saw the whole thing, beginning to end, up close. The stage was close to the back of the auditorium, so really it was one of the best views to watch it all go down. One of the girls in our group threw up. People were crying all over. When they finally got the "detonator" about 50 guys randomly came down from the stands and beat the hell out of him. An exciting evening... Glad to see someone remembers it. :)]

Now, in this context you actually see a witness to 50 guys beating the hell out of me, and that being called an 'Exciting Evening' for a Church Fireside? Can you imagine that all videotaped and held by the LDS Church Authorities, after mine you, what they say was a a threat was removed.

That's an important context. Its like after police have someone on the ground subdued, and then the punching and kicking and beating begins. That is a reprehensible and punishable by excessive force. You in your statements are glamorizing, and enjoying the harm that is being caused in your statements.

Now, of course we notice "detonator" is in quotes, because there was none. Police recovered none, there was no more a threat then you could imagine one made out of a pop-tart. The very disturbing thing is after all that was understood and known, a greater embarrassment came upon the Church Leaders. SWAT Team actually blew my scriptures up on Camera presented to the TV Channels, and they doubled down on their prosecution. Yes, its a huge embarrassment for the Church.

 Charges were escalated from misdemeanors to 1st degree felonies with no more 'evidence' no more damage discovered, and no more evidence of any weapon whatsoever, and certainly no harm to any person. These are the facts. This is why I object so much to your 'framing' the event towards newspaper articles owned by the Church or if nothing else condensing the statement to a sentence.

Since you may be big on my opinion mixed with others in your idea of fairness, How about :

Cody Robert Judy, with no juvenile or prior criminal record whatsoever, court records reveal, was framed by LDS Church Leaders cooperating with the then LDS Bishop serving as District Court Judge of the Church/State. Frames of the video tape were released to the Press. It seems the illegal union of church and state authority lied on their part in a plea-bargain to wash the whole thing down the tube with '6 months time served'. Court Records show Cody's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea three days later after the nefarious trap was understood. He served 8 years in prison with 5 Rehearings. Many attempts were made to obtain the evidence of the video tape of the Marriott Center Incident. KTVX Channel 4  with their own lawyers spent 10K to obtain the video-tape they acclimated would make LDS Church Leaders heroes if nothing was amiss. Many witnesses attesting to what is referred to as a mob of upwards of 50 beating Mr. Judy after it was understood no threat existed, while the Church refused the evidence to Mr. Judy on his Appeals. Mr. Judy refused by his Criminal Court Judge/LDS Bishop the evidence, was forced to take the LDS Presidency to Court who maintained Copyright of the Videotape, and appealed clear to the U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Case No. 96-7655. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled 'not enough people suffered [n]ot getting evidence used against them' to hear the Civil Law Case.

Is there something wrong with that statement? I mean if you have to bring it up at all?

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/2vsbsc/anyone_else_in_the_marriott_center_on_feb_7th_1993/

It is understood the Democratic National Party is in charge for Democratic Candidates on this site.
Contact Information
Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: (202) 863-8000
http://my.democrats.org/page/s/contact_issues

Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-863-8700
Fax: 202-863-8820
Email: Info@gop.com

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
www.codyjudy.us

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)