BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA and GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S ORDER to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA

PART I. OF THIS REPORT HERE- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA /GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S REQST to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA
APPEARANCES THE U.S. SUPREME COURT "WILL" HERE JUDY V. OBAMA

'08, '12, and 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy told supporters Wednesday listening to Michael Medved's commercial that called Birthers "Attackers" and queried the listener that there was no good reason not to let foreigners into the Commander-In-Chief's position that handles keys to America's nuclear option as well like Obama has gutted the military commanders chiefly in charge of the leadership responsible for defending America, that there has come another sign or appearance upon the stage that indicates the United States Supreme Court has at least five Justices that would like to hear the case hurdling the Rule of Four that is necessary. [A little 'Thank You' to The Drudge Report for Favoriting our TWEET of this Report!]

"Chief among four things that points us in that direction", Judy said, "transpiring since my latest May 22nd Breaking News Report that has become this Blogs' Second Most Viewed Post eight days ago now on Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which you might find interesting as well:

" 1st Point-The Internet Site Certpool.com that manages to keep track of all the cases from every Circuit Court that has filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court has begin posting CONFERENCE CASES listed for June 11th, 2015, which misses the June 8th Date we had projected as in sinc function of normal procedures for the Court dismissing cases.

"Elaborating on the details of this sites report we see that just one of the cases "set for Conference" had a due date of May 20th for the Respondent to Respond coordinating with mine. The greater number of cases that also contained the May 20th deadline were indeed set from the 10th Circuit for "the June 4th Conference" and the latest date of response I found on the June 4th Conference itinerary was 'Response Due June 8th' overlapping my Cases' Response due date of May 20th by some 17 days.

"Indeed of the 10 cases set for the Conference just from the 10th Circuit 7 have dates extended out beyond mine as "due dates for Response", set by the Court, upon the filing of the Writ of Cert."

DRUDGE FAVORS THREE CRJ TWEETS...................................

Not everything is recorded on the Docket Reports that are presented to the public view Cody continued, " I remember from my experience when I filed a Emergency Motion for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear my Case in 2012 based on the term of the Court expiring before the coming election, and it was listed as a Supplemental Brief by the Clerk of the Court, which hardly gives a clue to the Public Eye of what is before the Court. That was filed July 16th, 2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which would have if heeded given the Court and the political arena plenty of time to adapt for the Nov. Presidential Election. The result of course was not in the public interest or favor of fair elections in 2012 and represented an excruciatingly painful wound for all of us to bear.

"What this suggest is my case is not on the fast track to be dismissed as might otherwise be the case if it was or had been distributed for Conference on June 4th. On that web site, you'll see "BIO" and that stands for "Brief in Opposition" requested and you see that on this particular case listed on the Docket Report of the Site here. This of course tells us that the Court is wanting a response by the Respondent that was not otherwise filed or where the Waiver was filed first. On the other case listed on the BIO Reported cases thus far seen here, you don't see that same Report on the Docket, which exemplifies or emphasizes my point that not all that is happening in a case is seen on the Docket Report.

"2nd Point, and that LITTLE something that doesn't seem to bode all that well for me is that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk has listed the Caption of my case as (CODY ROBERT JUDY vs. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States et. al.,) and that is of course not how it was filed. Ask yourself how often you see the Clerk changing the caption of a case from how it appears on the papers they receive from attorneys? The public can see the Writ of Certiorari that was filed here on SCRIBD.

"3rd Point- of this would indeed be the actual Response that I received from Donald B. Verrilli Jr. the current Solicitor General just yesterday which was quite interesting in the way it was written. A. it was NOT signed! Now if I filed a Record to the Court that was not signed, it would not be counted as 'valid'. This of course would indeed be considered a HUGE error and represent a formal LACK OF RESPONSE to the U.S. Supreme Court Order. The Court in my case has gone to great lengths in the past to shall we say 'pull my hair out' with trivial points of crossing t's and dotting i's and has not been very lenient to me as a prose litigator causing me great pain at times. This has also been recorded as when they sent my Writ back to me needlessly costing me additional paper work that is expensive with mailing expenses over years as well as providing 'time' for the Respondent and successfully delaying the Case.

"B. It also listed the Case differently than is presented by me in the Court, listing the official position of Barack Obama in the Government as President of the US. last I checked the abbreviation written by most juveniles for the United States of America is was the U.S.A; therefore the wording of "US" pertains directly to, perhaps a small group of people that is not elaborated upon? Your guess is as good as mine. Who is "US"?

"One of the biggest points of my Case is if Obama was elected with fabricated identifications, forged long form birth certificate, fabricated selective service record, fake social security number that couldn't even pass e-verify as was the example when they tried to show how easy Obamacare was to register for, as well as not even being a qualified Candidate that, should he be elected is able to lawfully qualify for the Office and operate the powers of the President by the vested power WE THE PEOPLE have directed for the OFFICE after being both qualified and elected, then how is it possible to even admit Obama in the Court as "President of the US", unless it certainly doesn't mean U.S.A?

"Given the most equitably and lenient discernment possible we come to the body of of the Solicitor General's argument on the Waiver, which states, "The Government was never served in this case and has not appeared in any of the proceedings. The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court" and then.. it's unsigned. (?)

"While I do agree "Government" can be used properly in this case by the Solicitor General based on Rep. Nancy Pelosi's involvement and Sen. Harry Reid in the combination of a functioning 'cartel' formed in the corporations of the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporation, unsigned its validity is worthless which DEFAULTS the Governments representation. And, let us not forget that May 20th was the date that Obama was given by the Court to Respond and he has failed to Respond by May 20th through any Counsel he might have privately for his defense also constituting a DEFAULT to the Court's Request that RESPONDENT'S file that on or before May 20th.

"4th Point and evenly appreciated is the fact that I did open the case up for any friend of the Court to file an Amicus Curiae Brief. These are filed and appear as little blue squares listed as "Amici" on the Certpool.com site. Of course when people are interested in say 'defending Obama' because they would like his policies protected against any disaster befalling his ability to function as President rather than having his ineligibility exposed by someone with standing in the U.S. Supreme Court and his ineligibility exposed thereby also nixing policies, we see none have been recorded for Obama.

" Summing this up very specifically and technically, the Court has not been addressed as it has ORDERED by either the Government or any person involved in this that was served. Obama was served at the WHITE HOUSE by signature if you remember I have recorded here, and by appearances we see the Court is mulling this over. I think we have 5 Justices that are inclined to hear the case."

We were dumbfounded with the Report of incompetence here. Who is "US"? Of course we will continue to keep you updated with details about when the United States Supreme Court decides to set the Case for Conference. For up to the minute Reports of what is happening in this Case Stay Tuned.


The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

NEW YORK TIMES Hint- Clinton build on that Birther Wall? Second Biggest Mistake Missing Rubio Early! May the Ghost Democrats Choose Come to Haunt Them

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
NEW YORK TIMES Hint- Clinton build on that Birther Wall? Second Biggest Mistake Missing Rubio Early!
May the Ghost Democrats Choose Come to Haunt Them

The NEW YORK TIMES article released hours ago, hints the window may be closing for Hillary's Candidacy if you have followed the recent Clinton Cash and Clinton Email debacles tormenting her headlines and putting a bad taste in the American Baked apple pie of the Clinton Camp: but the window is closing faster on Hillary's chance to actually lead by filing a brief in Court that could place the nail in the coffin for Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal. The problem: it also places the nail in the coffin for Barack Obama.

Hillary Clinton faces a decision that actually requires early leadership in her Campaign which may just be the same decision that blew the tires out of her 2008 Campaign by not putting Barack Obama's lack of Constitutional Qualifications to the test. Not seizing an opportunity to indirectly take Rubio out now is one the Clinton Camp could come to regret in a 2008 repeat of defeat, or self fulfilling prophesy.

Hillary's Camp was a Birther against Sen. John McCain Mid-Stream in 2008; also A FEATURED New York Times Article "Hint of New Life to McCain Birth Issue if you recall, raising questions and then succumbing early based on Obama. Articles HERE and HEAR. If Hillary Clinton doesn't file an amicus curiae in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, she has just made the second biggest political mistake of her life not taking out three top tier Republican Candidates. The first was NOT doing it with Obama and the New York Times just put the "Birther" writing on the wall.

Remember this? She'd shaken hands at a factory gate in Toledo, Ohio, then before flying to Texas held a media availability where she said: "Sen. McCain brings a lifetime of experience to the campaign. I bring a lifetime of experience. And Sen. Obama brings a speech he gave in 2002." If it didn't work well in 2008, how well is that strategy going to work in 2016 against Sen. Marco Rubio that even the Blaze ran a story on early in 2011 referencing what has become the stand in the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama: that natural born Citizen means "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. This is a two generation protection from foreign alliance/allegiance for the Office of the President in the interest of our national security? If national security is not an interest in the Republican Platform to pick a bone with I don't know what is.

HAVE DEMOCRATS LOST THEIR FIGHT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS

If Democrats have lost their will to fight for Minorities that's another story. Of course I am not being paid to counsel Hillary Clinton and if she was faced with facing me or a handsome Cuban who brings women to tears and pulls the heart strings right out of your chest with the humble immigrant story as the New York Times Report capitulated multiple times referring to Marco's parents as immigrants of Cuba who did not become U.S. Citizens until their son was four years of age, WHO do you think she'd rather face? This then proves Rubio qualified as a Citizen to be a U.S. Senator. Rubio remains unqualified to be U.S. President for failure of being a "natural born Citizen". The Standard has served America well as a wall from foreigners seizing the reins until the wall was cracked with Barack Obama. I say cracked because its not busted down yet, but is teetering precariously from assault.

Let's face it now. If you put Hillary Clinton on the political debating stage with Barack Obama and she couldn't win eight years ago smashing his lack of experience all over the Media, and the Presidential 2016 Candidate has eight more years of wrinkles, eight more years towards a fading memory, and eight more years of political garbage, how on earth are you going to sway independent voters away from U.S. Senator Marco Rubio? Hillary does not win with her supporters. She wins by swaying those who are sitting on the wall as Independents.

If Republican Challenger Jeb Bush looks old on the debating stage of fresh horses in the Republican Arena, how does Hillary pave away to the finish line and not get tripped up crossing it against a Souped Up Republican Charge over the qualifications inspection of the Constitution as Independents look on at the unconstitutional state of affairs placed in front of them by Democrats? That's why Democrats have to change. The future is here and Barack Obama is not part of the American Future. He is the past, he's enjoyed the White House, now its over. Why not lower the boom on a lame duck to protect America's future Democrats especially when Republicans have a much deeper field of unqualified candidates?

Your just not going to be able to put enough make-up in those wrinkles when you allow unconstitutional Candidates to wear suits, and that's why Hillary Clinton has perhaps two weeks to show some leadership skills by finessing a amicus brief in the case of Judy v. Obama 14-9396. That takes three Candidates out of the picture very quickly who are siphoning gas. Three TOP TIER Republican Candidates GONE, who are set out for the early debating stage in August that threaten her Campaign.

Hillary Clinton hasn't had to do a thing in Court. She capitalizes on the work of a no-name unelected Candidate for President like me. Her name is not recognized in Court as a Birther, she simply gives a nod to the U.S. Supreme Court that says, "You know what, this has been a problem continues to be and we need to get it cleared up and now is a good time".

If Hillary Clinton doesn't do this she doesn't want to be President and she certainly doesn't want a women to be President. You can't help but wonder if there is some nagging housewife in her head that actually remains there screeching. "women don't follow women, they follow men", in some sort of blurry astigmatic self destruction? It would actually take real Leadership for Hillary to file an Amici or friend of the Court Brief with the potential to knock out three men across the isle with as little as one Brief in the United States Supreme Court that says, "Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Bobby Jindal are not qualified as natural born Citizens and this is a problem for me, but more importantly its a problem for the Country".

Far from being discriminatory, its a national security interest, and if a female Presidential Candidate doesn't have the courage to take a stand for our national security interest here at home, she sure doesn't have the courage to lead our Nation abroad. The "natural born Citizen" clause of the qualification for the Office of the President is the key to our Constitution and that Constitution includes the rights to so many minorities. If the Constitution is not protected minorities most certainly including women are the first casualties.

Not only does a Brief from Hillary signal a home run for destroying gender inequality, to take a stand for the Constitution, it signals the ability to lead both genders in a field of equality. Hillary is not just running to be the first female American President, she is running to lead a Nation and ours starts with the U.S. Constitution because it is the back bone of so many minorities and gender was considered as such with the passage of suffrage, or the ability for women to cast a vote. That was a huge minority victory for women that needed to be carved out in our Constitution and if Hillary doesn't stand for that, what does that tell you about her stability?

Far from being so prideful that I would stand opposed to a female, strictly based on her being a female for U.S. President, actually leadership,admired and recognized in England for her uncompromising politics and leadership style, was what characterized Margret Thatcher. Showing America Hillary can lead requires acting the part of leading, not waiting around for her turn, as if the Office of the President was a water fountain people stood around waiting their turn for. Leadership actually requires at times being out in front as a trail blazer where things are not always paved with a new black top that's easy on the tires and smooth on the ride.

Hillary is a at least qualified in my book according to the Standards set in the Constitution. Let it not be said "if" my case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is dismissed without so much as a hearing by the United States Supreme Court with no tangible interference of current elections hinging on the hearing, such as the 'chad' count we had in George W. Bush v. Al Gore (which could turn out to be the ghost of Florida revisiting Democrats again) wasting 2.5 Billion Dollars with a loss to Florida U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio,it could prove the pivot point of regret for Hillary.

So what does it say about her if she's unwilling to defend herself with the Constitution? It says she's unwilling to defend you her biggest and most loyal women's rights advocates. If that doesn't resonate with men, it should at the very least among women, who not only are seeing Hillary's Clinton Foundation accept money from foreign countries with a dismal record of open gender discrimination, along with her paying her own employees who are female less than their male counterparts, both of which have been reported, it shows you she's no Champion for you.

Far from being an enemy to Democrats Cody Robert Judy has been a friend setting the stage and creating the vehicle Democrats could now certainly use. But that opportunity could be squandered or wasted if the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses Judy v. Obama without granting the CERT. In fact referencing McCain's own Lawyers in the 2008 Article is a direct testament of the standing I have in Judy v. Obama. In that article it says, "In the motion to dismiss the New Hampshire suit, Mr. McCain’s lawyers said an individual citizen like the plaintiff, a Nashua man named Fred Hollander, lacks proof of direct injury and cannot sue."

One thing is for sure, and that is the coming 2016 Election presents America adrift of leadership from its legislative body with culpable Candidates who are ineligible and part of a 'good ole boys' club protecting their own. I am not a member of that Club so the Constitution is a Standard I can live with. It was just for that certainty, the forming of Good Ole Boys Clubs, that a Judicial Body was necessary in our Republic, that was distinct and separate; able to see with a clear vision the Constitutional Standards without the pressures of being elected. If the Judicial Body headed by the U.S. Supreme Court fades into the shadows on this, the door is left open for the Legislative Bodies of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate unchecked in a Constitutional Corruption to ruin the Republic!

The six years it has taken Cody Robert Judy to get this principled stand to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the State options exhausted, and his Campaign in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 for President has not been an easy or popular road. By all accounts not one elected person in DC or in the past two Presidential Election cycles has taken the road on a bi-partisan stand with McCain and Obama. If the opportunity is to be wasted it is at the very least wasted with a full knowledge of the Clinton Camp adopting the ghost they choose to haunt them.


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

BREAKING NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT - Eligibility FOR PRES Posted in U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE is Obama OUT?

BREAKING NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT - Eligibility FOR PRES Posted in U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE is Obama OUT?
The Greatest Crisis to hit the American Political Arena in American History


As more and more people find out and start discerning what is happening right in front of them,I must say I can hardly keep up with the attacks upon me personally ad hominem, as well surrounding and not to be soon forgotten, my action in the United States Supreme Court entitled Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the cognitive dissonance that the simple truth causes.In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time, or is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values. If that doesn't explain the plight of Americans for what is the truth about prohibiting aliens and foreign nationals from the highest office of the land, I don't know what does.

The ad hominem attacks, which in layman's terms are methods used to shoot the messenger or attack the person's character rather than have to address the truth of the arguments on the facts to the national security crisis we face. That Crisis is that a 'natural born Citizen' is a distinct qualifications for the Office of the President and Vice President (who could if the President was harmed be forced to step up in that position),as a separate and distinct qualifications from the U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators qualification stated within the U.S. Constitution as "Citizen".

Indeed "Citizen" is used in the qualification clause for the Office of the President, but in a limited way upon which there was an expiration date of its use. That expiration date was set upon the death of anyone living at the time of the adoption or ratification of the Constitution. You see, how could a new Constitution demand 'natural born Citizens' upon an office when it first became law? There was no way those living at the time could be born again to Citizen Parents. They were the Country's first children. This is a perplexity that no one has yet seemed to figure out that offers the wisdom for which the terms were progressively adopted as the new Citizens of the United States bore the burdens of the jurisdiction of the United States of America and their children became the first 'natural born Citizens' under the laws of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Constitution itself tells us what a natural born Citizen is by telling us that there is a progressive enhancement of trust that is required for the Office of the President. It's all there in one sentence. Far from prohibiting people of new American citizenship from voting our laws today allow a citizen whose adopted into our society even one day the right to vote but the percentage of people believing a citizen of one day is qualified to be President is said to be infirm at best and crazy at worst.

In an April 16th 2015 article by JB Williams entitled "Ignorant American Voters Now Greatest Threat to America?", JB asserts a recent on-line survey that was posted to more than a dozen 'conservative' Facebook (FB) groups that asked:

"Do you believe that 14th Amendment "anchor babies" and "undocumented citizens" are "natural born Citizens" eligible for the Oval Office?"

Within hours JB reports 166 members in those FB Groups shared the post and approximately 100 members voted in the survey within hours of the post. Given the options of "No", "Yes", and "I don't know" 100% were reported as answering "NO". That sounds like good news and that conservatives at least have some diligence in protecting and defending the Office of the President defined in the U.S. Constitution from foreign entities.

JB cites the American Voter as the danger to ending American Sovereignty from just two factors:
1) The human tendency to follow that which we want to be true, despite knowing what is true
2)The tendency to ignore reality in favor of a political fantasy

JB goes on in the devastating article, to the Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio candidacies for President, to skewer those supporting 'conservative values' who when the dots are connected and they find out that Sen. Ted Cruz is a 'undocumented resident alien' born in Canada to one Cuban and one U.S. Citizen parent both who may have become Canadian Citizens for work purposes and neither who did the proper paper work on their son which is why Texas elected a Canadian Citizen for a U.S. Senator as attested by Sen Cruz's denouncing that citizenship just a year ago now, and Sen. Marco Rubio is in fact an "anchor baby" who was born to Cuban Parents who did not become U.S. Citizens until years after Marco's birth.

As soon as the facts are understood that neither of these Candidates qualify to be the President of the United States, a cognitive dissonance takes place away from the truth that is known, and towards a pacification. Indeed at the heart of the question in the mind of supporters is 'How am I different then any democrat who leans so far left as to have the will to dismiss the entire Constitution, the Congress, and the United States Supreme Court in favor of making Obama a life long King, because they really can't stand the idea of Hillary becoming President?"

Yes, Obama may have had an outer layer of epidermis working on that pacification upon Democrats that justified with dissonance his not being a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President also, with his own representation of his long form birth certificate that he passed out and hung in the White House declaring his father was a Kenyan at the time of his birth.

SUPPORT FROM THE RIGHT TO SUPPLANT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

"Global Governance only works in America once anyone from anywhere in the world can be Commander-in-chief" recited JB
Now, you really need to know the history of friends before you conclude JB is mine even though I'm quoting him. You know I objected to McCain's Candidacy in U.S. District Court as a Candidate for President in 2008 and JB had no problem letting me have it because he wanted to 'justify' McCain who essentially was in the same position as Cruz being born in Panama, on foreign soil, but having a claim to being a Citizen by an Act of Congress, you might say was kind of like the 14th Amendment accept especially for those foreign babies born abroad to U.S. Citizens in Panama, whose first breath their parents at least might recall, was not that under the jurisdiction of any "State" in the Union of the United States.

JB fiercely apposed me and my Candidacy in 2008 as well as my Democratic Party Candidacy against Obama in 2012 and as far as my Candidacy in 2016 he's not written a word about it or the facts that Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is in the U.S. Supreme Court and if heard could really nail down the definition for both Republicans and Democrats. The good news is I really haven't heard anyone state emphatically they hope the Court doesn't hear the case.

Isn't it strange to you that you haven't seen any Tea Party Groups thus far anyway celebrating or supporting my Candidacy as I've come out against as of late the Candidacies of Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio the same consistent way I fought against McCain and strangely Obama whose case is just ripe enough to actually be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court as they have an understanding that the "States" are not upholding the Constitution of the United States in the qualifications enumerated for the Office of the President. This certainly may have been there hope as the Ballot Challenges came to them from me in 2012 from New Hampshire and Georgia State Supreme Courts.

This in fact was an exhaustion of State's Rights in the Appeal Format from the earliest point of the 2012 primaries Democrats all hated my guts for. Now, with all the Republicans for Cruz and Rubio,I'm sure if Glenn Beck had a Gestapo
I'd end up in some dark ally. It really cannot be denied Mr. Beck is a fan of the Constitution by his words, but when you're attacking the nucleus of the Constitution with a fervor while protecting the parameters of it, can you really be considered a friend of the Constitution?

This is at the heart of the Greatest Crisis to hit America in the Political Arena in our History. Has Glenn Beck, along with the Tea Party and Republicans eroded the word "conservative" to the point of a calibrated fascism? Fascism is an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. It nearly fits like a glove to want the authority in an authoritarian tyranny rather then supporting authentic qualifications in the check and balance system designed in our three co equal branches of Government.

The question purposed is what check and balance if any does the United States Supreme Court have on the Executive Branch or Office of the President if the Court refuses to hear and thus makes a tacit implication that the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch are more permissible in defining the Constitution in the demands of qualification for the Office of the President?

I purpose with my Writ of Certiorari that the Courts very existence is in jeopardy with its refusal of my case. If the Court refuses my Case sooner or later, a dictator will rise up and dismiss the entire Court as a hindrance to his important projects and agenda. The vengeance of a person coming out of the Legislature who has had a piece of his work dismissed as unconstitutional by the Court is all the motive that would be needed and should be all the motive needed for the Court to uphold the qualifications of the President defined in the U.S. Constitution.

Don't you see the devil coming out of the Legislature? "I worked so many hours, cutting so many deals to get this piece of legislation passed at the risk of my office which has cost millions, and you Justices 'think' that a hammer down on a piece of legislation deemed unconstitutional is not going to be remembered?" Oh how silly that notion is!

Oh how silly is the notion that in working with colleagues in the Legislature one who gives you at the time a needed vote or two or three would not develop into a 'good ole boys' club that in many ways protect and defend one another. We saw that in 2008 with Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama sponsoring so kindly for and with Sen. John McCain U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 that kindly was a Congressional Act trying to usurp nature calling Sen. McCain a 'natural born Citizen'. Hey get a clue, if you have a need for a ACT of Congress your not a natural born Citizen which needs no ACT of Congress to be defined for nature has defined it in her own dictionary that has been recognized since nations were formed.

Ohhh how happy the Main Stream Media was to see the two children walking hand in hand loving one another. But wait! What is that? President Cruz? President Rubio? Ohhhh my Democrats, now you have a powerful force wanting to break the children up seeing Hillary not so youthful and our Cuban Brothers coming on shore, maybe they will change parties and vote in the Primaries for them because in theory they are stamping Obama's work as OK. And this really gets to my point of exposing the 'political parties' willingness to part with principle based on fads of popularity.

The United States Supreme Court was made for something like this. I really don't think the Legislature, given their history of trying to change the Constitution's qualifications for President eight times since 2003, is up to policing the qualifications of President. Those failures should remind the Court that the People have spoken through their Elected Officials and if it had changed there is no doubt, the Court would be expected to uphold the Change if it was an Amendment to the Constitution which they are supposed to in theory uphold.

People frown on what's called legislating from the Bench, but its the Constitution that forms the wall the Justices find themselves standing behind when ever their decision is deemed unpopular. In Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the Legislature has been given 6 years to control themselves and we've seen that hasn't happened. No hearings have been called with the revelations that everyone in Congress pretty well freely admits shows the Office of the President compromised or in fact usurped. What do you call it "Lazy" or "Complicit"? Neither one works for me because I'm in the trenches doing the work they were elected to do and have not done!

It is a fair assessment to say that without the Judicial Branch's willingness to ACT its part in the three legged chair we call our Government under the Constitution that chair falls and with it we all tumble down sacrificing our crowns as citizens to the chains of servitude. I don't think their is any greater part in the check and balance system of our Government then for the Judicial Branch to check the qualifications of a person as a natural born Citizen for the Office of the President. If I had to pick one of the three qualifications to be skipped by the public's popularity contest in political parties, I'd have them skip the age requirement of 35 and the residency requirement of at least 14 years. So of the three strict requirements in my opinion those you have elected have and are ignoring the most important one. The fate of our Nation the Legislature has turned their backs on and in such a grave situation the Supreme Court of the United States is the only place short of war and revolution that we have hope to secure our liberty.

BREAKING NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT - Eligibility FOR PRES Posted in U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE is Obama OUT?
You know for all those people who blow hard wind on the Eligibility Issue of the Office of the President? You know who I'm talking about don't you?

Don't you remember the cash machine that whipped out thousands of dollars for the Bill Boards all across America? Can you think of a good reason for them to sweep this story under the table?

WND has covered nearly every case of eligibility on Court Record if there was an attorney representing it. I had an honorable mention by them for my Case in Georgia if you recall by Bob Unruh "Judge whacks Obama in Eligibility Case" , but has there been a peep from them regarding this United States Supreme Court Case since it was docketed or has a more sinister recognition of reality come to us with WND tacit consent of Senator Cruz and Senator Rubio's candidacies? They did cover Texas Rep who was decidedly overwhelmed with cognitive dissonance about embracing Obama and Cruz in his statement regarding Cruz, "He's as eligible as Obama". So has the wish of Obama that WND would change come true?

You know there comes a time when you say, "If you can't beat them join them", but its devastating when joining them means bowing as subjects without the rights you once had as citizens. A new modern slavery is well within the grasp of the decision on Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and that might be one of the reasons that we are witnessing what is an unprecedented docketing for Amicus Curiae's at the United States Supreme Court for this case.

Have you ever seen that on the Court's Docket in an Eligibility Case? I haven't, but if you have please make a note in the comments for me of which case that is. I just saw this today on my Case even though I reported it April 27th on a post here, its now May 7th and just showed up.

A sweeping breath of fresh air came over me actually and I had a little bit of hope creep into me thinking, "Ok, Obots and CruzBots and RubioBots now is your chance to actually get what you think a 'natural born Citien' is on RECORD in the United States Supreme Court. You can quit castigating those of us who have brought it to the Court as in some kind of a derision or diluted state of mind and put up with pride what you've been defending for years on Court Record! Hey Doctor, Doctor what's his bucket Conspiracy, call your Obots to pitch in a little pool and get a qualified Lawyer whose got a licence to practice in the United States Supreme Court and write a Brief as a friend of the Court. My work could be your opportunity today because as the Docket says, your BRIEF, it doesn't have to be long, can be "for one or the other or neither party". If there was ever a call to defend Obama in the Office of the President what would hold those warriors of mysteries cloaked in anonymity and creative jargon back?! This is your chance to actually be heard and be legit with real names and real lawyers!

Enjoy our New Commercial!
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!

BREAKING NEWS: Eligibility Battle Being Fought in The U.S. Supreme Court Demands we Stand Up not Stand Down.

BREAKING NEWS: Eligibility Battle Being Fought in The U.S. Supreme Court Demands we Stand Up not Stand Down.

Disinformation and Computer Hacks Key for Obama in the Eligibility Battle

Disinformation and Computer Hacks Keys for Obama in the Eligibility Battle Being Fought in The U.S. Supreme Court as well as diversions set just so American's will take their eye off the ball and fumble the very case that has the potential to dismember an illegal Executive Branch.

A very big story was written by Sharon Randeau Editor-In-Chief over at The Post & Email here and was printed with permission at Birther Report here.

It is important to realize that, you know, there just isn't a lot of experience happening at the Supreme Court of the United States when it comes to Birther Cases or the Article II Eligibility Qualification Requirements for the Office of the President. These things don't happen very often with Presidential Candidates themselves taking other Candidates to Court claiming damages to their Campaigns because some Candidate is violating the Constitution's Qualifications for Office.

Now have we been alone in the matter? The answer is "No". In fact, many have looked upon the same sex (SS) Marriage(SSM) fight happening that was just heard in the United States Supreme Court yesterday as a seven year battle. In fact there is an article printed at the Salt Lake Tribune called "The little gay-marriage case in Utah that roared and made history" citing Kitchen v. Herbert and the denial of certioari in seven appeals from five different states.

The one case that has been heard is a combination of cases brought to the Supreme Court in Court Case Numbers 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, and 14-574 under James Obergefell et al, Petitioners v. Richard Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health. Now what I really want to point out in these cases that seems to be the problem or disinformation that is being used against the ineligibility case against Obama is in the question:

CAN AMICUS CURIAE BE FILED IN THE SUPREME COURT BEFORE CONFERENCE?


The disinformation campaign is telling people who are seeking those who are qualified to file "NO". The Amicus Curiae Brief or friend of the Court if you look at the docket of the SSM Case Obergefell v. Hodges has no fewer than three "Briefs of Amicus Curiae filed before it went to Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court after it was docketed November 14,2014 and the Response stated was due Dec. 15,2014 :

1)Brief Amici Curiae From Idaho Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter field Dec 15,2014
2)Brief Amici Curiae of Colage: Eqaulity Federation, et al filed Dec. 15,2014
3)Brief Amici Curiae of 76 Scholars fo Marriage filed Dec 19, 2014

After it was Distributed to Conference and consequently "granted" meaning the Case would be heard, no fewer than 140 Amicus Curiae's have come in. Of course everyone gets excited when the Court agrees to hear a case but what was the impact of those first three that took a chance and filed before it even went to conference?

That case was distributed for conference January 16th,2015 and the Petition was granted January 16th,2015.

This just gives us a little idea of how things were run on the track, and what plays were made by whom, in that particular Supreme Court Case of the United States. You may also notice on that Docket Case the "Consent to the filing of Amicus Curiae Brief's was filed by Respondent's Dec. 8th, 2014.

Of course in that case the Respondent's were expecting some very big high profile and notable Amicus Brief's to be filed with the Court which would undoubtedly compel attention and it did.

FEATURED SPECIAL GUEST ON THE CHUCK MORSE SPEAKS SHOW

Tomorrow morning I will be a guest on the CHUCK MORSE SPEAKS show discussing this Case and some of the harrowing trials that are coming right along with it that people just don't see. For instance, it is an incredible state of stamina that we have had to pursue in the entire course of this race since 2008 when I filed the first of what is now thirteen Cases in Court trying to get a Court to hear it.

CATCH THE INTERVIEW NOW ON PODCAST at your convenience Link
PODCAST OF RADIO USA NETWORK INTERVIEW of Chuck Morse with 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy. Interview starts at 51 min. 34 sec. if you'd like to catch it and were busy, now you can tune in at your convenience.

http://awhigmanifesto.blogspot.com/2015/04/christian-support-for-israel-democratic.html


It is just unbelievable that all the Courts have even refused to give so much as a hearing on this vitally important national security concern as if they had no part in shaping and also shouldering much of the blame in retrospect that indeed their is a check and balance decidedly directed towards the Judicial Branch as a check and balance of the Executive Branch of Government, as well the Legislative Branch.

I can think of no greater defense of the Constitution given to the Judicial Branch then to, when called upon, rise to the occasion of discernment upon the qualifications so called for in the United States Constitution upon the qualifications of the Offices listed there in that document. If that concern and case be for the Office of the President the political doctrine question is not an escape hatch to the most important office of the United States of America's Executive Branch defined in said United States Constitution!

Believe me there are scores of attorneys reading,ingesting, and dissecting this argument. In fact, before the story at the Post & Email came out and only two days after it had been uploaded the Petition for Writ of Certiorari I have submitted had 777 reads on Scribd and after the story 2,666 reads. Lawyers and Scholars are the only ones' who give a hoot about reading what most Americans would call gobelty-goop and can't pronounce these documents much less make any sense out of them.

This has been one incredible journey since 2008 when I filed my first law suit against McCain in the Las Vegas, Nevada District Court. Without the slightest promotion the Scribd Site that has kept guard over most of the documents I have filed has surged to 27,000 individual views. This is certainly indication that the legal work I have been engaged in is leaving a foot print in the legal minds of our Nation.

Of course I am small part to the Principle of the 'natural born Citizen' requirement in the Constitution very directly stated and standing alone with the office of the Vice President from the requirement of 'Citizen' mentioned in the Constitution for the Offices of Senators and Representatives. When asked if I thought it was odd that a wall would be put up against those elected to those offices from the Office of the President, I said, "No, that is not strange at all. In fact, there are two other walls that are also very distinct placed to impede those elected to Representatives and Senators and those walls also have to do with age and time in the States.

This natural born Citizen 'requirement' for the Office of the President is probably the single biggest natural defense mote that has encircled the United States of America's borders from foreigners, aliens, and nationals. You hope that your own Representatives and Senators would see it as a defense and not go on the offence or be offended with it but it is just not the case. When ever their are power seeking men inflamed with the lusts of power, there must be constraints and restraints on those men and our Constitution has served We the People well in honoring that tradition for 44 Presidents minus Chester who burned his identification and Obama who passed his fabricated long form out.

You know probably the saddest thing about this battle being waged silently in the Civil Judicial Courts is that in spite of the attention of lawyers, scholars, and those who concern themselves with the laws that govern and protect us, those who respect the laws, those who understand that its the laws that protect American Opportunity, from assault, from gang violence, from bullies and thugs yet the single most important position that constrains those spheres of anarchy in the POTUS is not quantified in the eyes of the Mainstream Media to the American Public.

Baltimore Maryland burning and rioting and looting was afterwards condemned by Obama, but the Baltimore Mayor whose said she 'gave space to those who wished to destroy', has a very close connection with the Obama as the secretary of the Democratic National Committee or DNC. She's is not a little ole mayor who heads out to vote Democratic Party every four years and Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is also Vice President of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

How many millions of dollars has beefing up and calling in cops from every corner of Maryland and the National Guard cost tax payers for a protest that when Officers saw getting out of hand with a rock being thrown, or a crowbar at the liquor door, or bottles of booze being thrown at them were told by their superiors to, "Stand Down!". While property and businesses were burned. While the Media sensationalized and dramatized it to the entire United States! Leadership doesn't do that, but an 'Agenda' does!

"Stand Down!", was also the words we were told the same Administration issued to those wanting to save Ambassador Chris Stevens the night of his death and those fighting to protect him and those trapped in the burning embassy. Do you see anything familiar with this? When our military and police can do their job, it gets done and the safety of Americans are the better for it.

Of course their are bad cops just like there are bad Presidents, but who can do the most damage to our Nation the quickest? Of course that distinction is in the Office of the President and is also why a mote was laid around the Office of the President's qualification that required no divided loyalties or foreign sympathies on the day of birth. That requirement qualification was not because some cute baby who didn't understand the language of his parents or the borders and boundaries where he was born. It was a time honored tradition of two generations that performed a purpose of separating foreign loyalties and sympathies. In fact, those sympathies we see Obama acting out every day are testimonies of exactly what the purpose was in digging that mote around the office of the President and Vice President.

I'm under a constant assault from hackers invading everything from my i-phone to my computer. American's do not know the battle I am fighting and have fought just to bring the case to the United States Supreme Court with a hope of defending our national security. For the 2011 fiscal year, the president's base budget for the Department of Defense and spending on "overseas contingency operations" combine to bring the sum to $664.84 billion and how much is one City in America not protected from 1,000 rioters one week end going to cost? What is the long term cost for Baltimore? How many businesses will now avoid building in Baltimore? How about the Police Officers injured in the line of duty?

We don't have very many people supporting and helping us. In fact, compared to the Country even the near 205,000 views on this Blog pales in comparison to what most American's are focused in on. I don't know if we will prevail, but at least Justice has a chance here in the United States Supreme Court. Without my case, it is gone and I think you understand and know that, yet, we are fighting with very little support and we do need your help in what every way you can manage.

Thank you for your consideration in supporting this battle and helping us with the keys that are necessary to uphold our Constitution and protect this Nation. We don't urge you to 'Stand Down', we urge you to 'Stand Up' and Take A Stand!

Cody Robert Judy


Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.




Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!