Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
The Charity of Hillary Clinton compromised email server, practises, and personal keeps on giving to ... Donald J. Trump.
What happened to Debbie Wasserman Schultz when Guccifer 2.0 released a few thousand more emails via WikiLeaks a couple of days ago? The number one Democratic Party Chair Seat is so Compromised Obama calls for her resignation for the health of unity.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz just a few days ago was aiding introductions between the presumptive Democratic Nominee Hillary Clinton and her choice of Kaine for the Vice President slot.
Today, she was booed off the Podium of her own Florida Delegation Breakfast simply from the information that was revealed from emails released from the hacking that DNC speculates may have come from Russia through the Guccifer 2.0 acclamation.
While Mrs. Schultz tendered her resignation news reports fiercely contended it was long overdue and had been on the agenda of Obama and Hillary Clinton for a long time contrasting Hillary's new appointment for Debbie as a Honorary Chair for her 50 State Coalition.
The information revealed Debbie heavily involved as a Hillary Clinton [operative chair] for her 2016 Election Campaign a step away from her 2008 work for Hillary in her 2008 Campaign for President.
The Catastrophic damages comes to the front of the News Cycle in the Mainstream Stream Media at the Price of favor to Clinton's Campaign and against all the other competing campaigns including Cody Robert Judy's and Bernie Sanders.
Reports indicate Julian Assange-WikiLeaks will yet force Clinton out of the Presidential Race with enough collusion between Clinton and the MSM to indict Hillary so bad Publically as to spoil the election and perhaps even result in a criminal indictment.
The results thus far against Democrats have been impressive by WikiLeaks / Guccifer/ Russia as Hillary Clinton's Campaign Chairman Robby Mook was attributing the connection to Russia Hacking indicated, [at Trump's expense], as he commented it seemed Trump was in league with Russia or Russia was helping Trump.
What the Public should take from this is Clinton's confidence that she would never face an indictment by the FBI's Investigation might jump the Fire line dug by Democrats as the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz is proof the cauldron flames are reaching ever higher.
It would seem nothing could persuade Democratic Party SuperDelegates and Delegates from dancing with the devil as toads in the water heating up even with such Revelations coming out that the whole Democratic Primary Season involving half the United States has been compromised.
The Fact the Delegates and SuperDelegates are not in revolt over the Revelations only exgoriates to the Public Hillary Rodham Clinton primary was uncontested and they are fine with that.
The obvious question is why even have a voting Primary if the Chairmen of the Democratic Party decides your in, you are the Nominee.
The problem is the money. In many States of the Union taxes of and taken from the public go to fund both Democratic Party and Republican Parties Primary Elections. Coronations are in fact essentially a privatisation of these funds to the beneficiary.
Like Hillary Clinton's privatization of the Secretary of State's Office through her obfuscation of FOIA with her Private Server indeed the public funds for these primary elections are left out of the scope and protection of WE THE PEOPLE .
Clinton's drive to [privatised take-over] now seeks the Office of President however the damages to the Public now, as dearly shown by Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Email Revelations, show us how easy Hillary Clinton can or could be blackmailed and with her in the Office of President, if she were in it.
While intent might have started out simply to avoid FOIA , the consequences can easily evolve into the title of Domestic Enemy of the United States of America.
For the safety and concern of this Hillary Clinton should not press the issue. If there is no intention to harm, she should RESIGN any Nomination of herself as Compromised.
If Hillary Clinton does care about the United States of America and her intentions are benign, as perceived by FBI James Comey in the excuses she was not sophisticated enough to prosecute as intelligent - essentially an incompetence charge or report, that sentiment should be expressed now and should be clearly pointed out to her resulting in a suspension of her Presidential Campaign.
If Hillary Clinton's intentions [are not] in the interest of the United States , she should be treated and prosecuted as a Domestic Enemy of the United States of America and certainly should not be allowed anywhere near the Office of President.
I believe any Candidate for President having the Love necessary for the people of the United States to be President would not hesitate preserving, protecting and Defending the United States of America by ending a Compromised Candidacy.
Democratic Party National Convention Message by Last Presidential Candidate standing against Hillary Clinton: https://youtu.be/58vjiJUBx3g
A Pre-Convention Message was given to the #DemsinPhilly by Democratic Party Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy protesting the corruption that only reaps corruption in an appeal for Truth and Justice.
Essentially Hillary Clinton's Lies should over-come any binding of Delegates and SuperDelegates as they compromise the Primary Voters of the People, providing an Open Convention between the last two active Presidential Campaigns in the Convention. Bernie Sanders has endorsed Hillary's Lies. .that is the reality.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Testifying before the House Judicial Committee the Nation's top law enforcement Official gave a sterling performance for any accused criminal on how to Duck and Dodge Questions to avoid Justice and responsibility.
One Congressman noticed the abscondsion had totaled over 75 Questions that A.G. Loretta Lynch had made to questions posed by Congressman.
What came out of the hearing was essentially that the Attorney General wanted to have it both ways.
She wanted to acknowledge very strongly she simply took the FBI's recommendation and had no part in formulation of any opinion, (with her unprecedented acknowledgement she would do so right after her meeting with Pres. Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in Arizona), while at the same time she refused to recuse herself and would have us believe she had reviewed the information thoroughly in a couple of hours the day after SOS Clinton's unrecorded and unoathed Saturday deposition with the FBI.
What was clear after 30 Million dollars of an FBI's 50 man team, 1 year Long investigation is the American People did not have an Attorney General fighting for Justice.
Rep. Steve King did an excellant job in his 5 min deposition of A.G Loretta Lynch. Rep. Trent Hanks had great thoughts and exposed the Attorney General's testimony as truly disappointing of Justice.
The overview was the A.G. basically admitted she was in gross negligence of overseeing any oversight of the Investigation. The extremely careless recollection of statute was evident by the Attorney general as to the actions of Hillary Clinton considering the investigation.
She made no reference to the avoidance of FOIA being considered a crime on the list.
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
Rep. Louie Gohmert made it a point to point out the A.G.'s job under oath was to the Constitution and the Law over and above the FBI's recommendation, but it was clear the Justice Department had a lot of input in drafting FBI Director's Statement per Justice Department considerations made by a seasoned and career panel assisting the FBI.
Rep. Jim Jordan corralled the A.G. in to in as much admitting the Justice Department through her had "no impact" on any Hillary Clinton decision- she had no roll but that she had contributed in her own unprecedented way in a prosecutorial discretion of a high official.
In a discussion of prosecutorial discretion the type of threat and violent backgrounds were considered in factors to prosecute. No mention that National Security of Top Secret Intel weighed heavy in type of threat or Hillary Clinton's domestic abuse upon Pres. Bill Clinton while First Lady in scratching him so bad he required covering bandages and minced he cut himself shaving., or, the abuse of hassling women who made accusations of sexual harassment in the domestic violence category.
Rep. Trey Gowdy made the point that the A.G's own email practises requires she use two different government systems to communicate via email. One for general business and a more secure one for any classified info., setting the double standard of practise and conclusion wide open to the understanding on main-street.
He trashed her on the issue of prosecuting cases with damages even that had no intention to do harm, but caused it.,like manslaughter or vehicular homicide. This showed "intent" was not necessary under more minor violations of gross negligence.
Several Congressmen asked the top law enforcement officer what her opinion was in the difference between gross negligence and extreme carelessness was, but she refused to give a coherent explanation.
Rep. Ron DeSantis stated the A.G's actions were unprecedented in stating she would abide the FBI's recommendation days before it came in.,but she refused to categorically reject that she would accept the job of A.G. under a Hillary Clinton Administration if she won the Election casting a big shadow on Justice.
Representative Mimi Walter's and Rep. John Ratcliff's time was well used, the latter stating with skepticism that the A.G. had come to the conclusion of the Facts of a year Long investigation very quickly over a cup of coffee and a few hours.
The one question that I didn't feel was hammered home was this one: Did the State Departments own involvement in not objecting to HRC's unsecured server and participating in HRC's own brand of delinquent stupidity have anything to do with not bringing charges or an indictment under the fear of a Rico Charges, where Obama's whole State Department would be seen also warranting charges?
It kind of reminds me under Sharia Law practised by Islamic Countries, the rape victim must have four witnesses stating she got raped. So, rape is difficult to prosecute. Similarly the perpetrator by involving others in the rape is able to get more witnesses against the victim.
So, by so many participating in Hillary Clinton's crime, she in affect secured many witnesses for her and the collaboration to avoid FOIA was systemic and involved hundreds of people.
The hearing also involved many Democrats in the questioning, but they spent their time asserting the "guns" involved in San Bernardino,Orlando, Dallas, Minnesota and others stated were responsible for deaths rather than discussing the motives in the People pulling the triggers of the guns such as " Islam Religious Tenants of Supramacy " in California and Florida's, or Black Supremacy in Dallas which miserably failed in considering and identifying the roots of the problem rather than the toppings of the Tree.
Republican's also failed to identify this clarity.
It was also revealed today Wiki LEAKS released 23,035 confidential emails on Hillary Clinton's Server making U.Show. Congress, The FBI, and Justice Department under A.Giant. Lynch look like fools.
for HER "Private Server" and Deny the Nomination for President
________
The contemplation of prosecuting one of your own family is probably one of the most difficult gut-wrenching decisions a person can be called to make. To sacrifice family in the interest of Justice can be near self-mutilation. In politics it may be easier to prosecute an opposing party on the other side of the isle, but it can be very difficult to allow Justice to take it's place in behest of someone who is dearly loved and admired as an example of Justice for All, but this is America and that is what we stand for. In the advent, interest, and primary goal of choosing a Candidate for President each Political Party must decide among themselves who best represents their Platform - a Primary Season is very much a test of what will come up from the other side of the isle in making a decision for a Candidate for the Office of the President and assuring that person is the best in representing the Party Platform. That's why it shouldn't be easy. In keeping with both the Democratic Party 'open big tent' and America's Tradition here is the most plain and simple reasons that the Democratic Party must choose to prosecute Hillary Clinton and deny her the Presidential Nomination of the Democratic party.Here is why #Democrats who pull the Voting Lever for ❤Hillary Clinton actually must pray for #RacialInequality, must hope for #GenderDiscrimination, and have set their eye upon #DeferredProsecution because in a Racially Equal World, in Perfect Gender Equality, and in an Economical Justice for all in the USA ❤Hillary Clinton as a rich white female should be Prosecuted equal to a poor black male and that can't happen if she is aloud off as a crook.
In the official capacity of the Office of Secretary of State - the USA's Top Foreign Diplomat Office, the greater responsibility towards Conduct is Expected and Demanded. There is no gray area with setting up a [Private Server] for the U.S. Government to conduct it's business on! No one has EVER EVER EVER done that.. No one!
Top Democrat Party Leaders recognize that! Debbie Wasserman Schultz has recognized that publicly Folks, when in an argument, she confided " accept setting up a Private Server" recognizing no Secretary of State has ever dared do that to Avoid FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) the Public Accountability Arm of our Government.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
VIDEO March 21st 2016 Schultz attempts to push Hillary's "Email" was the Problem rather then the [setting up of a Server] [“She’s actually said if she had it to go back and do it again, she
would not have used private email, but in terms of what she was doing
with compliance, that she was compliant,” Schultz said. “I don’t think it’s only using private email, but it’s also having
the server. She’s made the case in the past that other secretaries of
state have had Gmail accounts,” Bartiromo said. “Sure, you can have a
Gmail account if you’re not using it for government business, but the
key is she’s the only one who actually had a server in her basement.”]
VIDEO April 24th, 2016 Chris Wallace calls Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the "Email" verses the "Server" difference at 1min 56 seconds Schultz is mixing terms for Clinton to confuse the public in the terms of email that other secretary of states have used while they were in office, but then she acknowledges "other than the Private Server". Then she buckles up and defends her obfuscation of 'email' again to focus attention away from "server" and then she laughs saying she wasn't counting to the question posed by Chris Wallace "Not 30,000!"
Schultz opines its about helping "everybody who wants to succeed have a fair shot to do so". Did Schultz give Cody Robert Judy a 'fair shot' to do so as the Chair head of the Democratic Party inviting him to Debates? No. Did Washerman offer a second tier for Candidates in the Democratic Party? No. Did Washerman provide the Email Server of the Democratic Party at the beginning of the process to all Federally Declared Candidates for the Democratic Party? No.
Even Unintentional SHARING or mis-handeling in the official Government Office is prosecuted as misconduct, in the Secretary of State Office with penalties for Criminal Violation. Here's a Report of Three Laws Clinton may have violated.
But as Democrats can we sit by and allow the Democratic Party to be taken over by a Candidate who is going to be prosecuted by the standard that we all have the ability to figure out? For instance everyone already knows , no one un-intentionally told Hillary Clinton to set up a [Private Server] for the US Government to conduct official business on while she was Secretary of State. We can all figure that out.
We can also all figure out pretty easily that Foreign Governments do not give millions of dollars to the Clinton Charity Organization - The Clinton Global Initiative without expectations of favor.
If Clinton's Clowning is Permitted Justice is Mocked
Therefore it was not unintentionally misconduct, it was deliberate. And it was criminally motivated to Avoid accountability by and to FOIA. She became a rogue entity to the United States Government in what can only be identified as deliberate acts of espionage compromising any outside U.S. Government Oversight to that Position!
While she was employed by [We The People], while she got paid by us she altered the key responsibility of the duties and became Self-Employed while in the Office. She created and completed Nixon's sentiment confession in the David Frost's Interview [that If the President did it it was Legal]
That's an interesting deliberation because it was indeed Hillary Clinton who in the prosecution of President Nixon did not want him to be able to receive Legal Counsel on the WaterGate Scandal. Hillary Clinton was on the Team prosecuting Nixon for essentially 'acting unlawfully in the office' and obtaining evidence unfairly or through the break-in. Like Nixon, Hillary Clinton devised a way to avoid public accountability. No Email of hers on her [Private Server] conducting Government Business would be released in FOIA without her oversight. She became self-employed and rogue. That meant she was only accountable to herself in the office of secretary of state rather then the People, while she received a monthly salary. She could delete what she did not want seen and no oversight was possible.
Nixon Relates "I believed when the President does it, it is not illegal"
It was done to avoid the Public Oversight in an Official Public Capacity and her Choice was that compromising Top Secret Reports and Data to Foreign States was acceptable, worth the price, and potential penalties, she acknowledged and recognized with her signature completely.
The Private Email Server was known by Obama officials of the State Department all along, even before Hillary Clinton took the oath of office.
STILL REPORT #573 Emails January 24th, 2009 ' The Stand Alone Separate network PC is [a] great idea From under-secretary for managment Patrick Kennedy of the State Department CC: Huma Abedine, Daniel Smith Also- January 24th, 2009 Luwis Lukens former Deputy Secretary of State and Executive Director of the Secretariat [set up stand alone PC in the Secretaries Office connect to system but not through our system to enable her to check her email from her desk..] CC: Huma Abedine, Patrick Kennedy, Daniel B
She's running for Office to avoid the accountability hoping, praying, counting on gender and racial and economical inequality so she will not be Prosecuted as a rich white female.
These Facts lay bear the entire Democratic Party Platform as nothing but hypocritical to it's base. That's why I'm fighting to be heard, fighting for the Platform of Justice, fighting as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party.
Romanian Hacker Guccifer recounts Breaching HRC Server
Our Nation should be a forgiving Nation after the Time for the Crime is done and paid for. To continue to prosecute after that is wrong.
We here in America do believe in second chances, we do believe in forgivness, but not at the expense and as a substitute of Justice for All - for Justice for a Few and Deferred Prosecution for the rich, powerful, appointed, white woman.
That is not Justice for All. That is a mockery of Justice; A mockery of economic Justice, a mockery of Racial Equality, a mockery of Gender Equality.
If #Democrats choose ❤Hillary Clinton as their Presidential Nominee they must sacrifice ALL they stand for, and all they hope for first. Federal Damage Assessments are now being conducted by the FBI Investigation per protocol into the Hillary Clinton Server National Security Breach.
If #Democrats choose Cody Robert Judy as their Presidential Nominee ALL they hope for, ALL they dream of, ALL they Espouse in their Platform is seen as Possible and True in the eyes of ALL THE WORLD!!!
Sincerely,
CRJ
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution. www.codyjudy.us
Cody's
Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that
has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of
the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the
collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a
choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every
dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your
individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy,
you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because
he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder
than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1)
Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court
5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama
Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme
Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court
12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah
Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama
U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
WHEN IS THE CONSTITUTION VIP? Article II (very important to Obama now he wants to Nominate another #SCOTUS Jurist), also contains in Section 1, Clause 5 a Qualification for President. [ a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution ] Why was, [or a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution], carefully placed?
The reason is because our Founders were not [natural born Citizens] of the New Nation. They were distinguished Patriot [Citizens] of the Revolution. They reserved wisely the Office of President by Qualification as mutually an [incentive] and a [national security barrier] of Time.
There has only been 42 Qualified Presidents in U.S. History out of all the people of over two Centuries here. Barack Obama Fabricated his long form birth certificate which simply restates he still want not qualified as his Father was never a U.S. Citizen. Chester Arther reportedly burned his identification from Canada inheriting the Presidency as Vice President for less than full term- to an assassination of Pres. James Garfield before the 25th Amendment was passed in 1967. He was not re-elected for a 2nd Term.
It's been a grievous and very trying 7 years with Obama in the Office of President as a defacto President essentially usurping the Office. He's been the most well financed Debt Laden Person combining astronomical debt amounting to more than all previous Presidents put together -10 Trillion Dollars amounting to 70K for every man, women, and child in the USA.
This is something I've understood from the Lord as aloud - not because it was right, but to teach [you] here and now, for multitudes in our Nation have no clue, the Value of the U.S. Constitution. You will hiss at Obama after your lessons are learned. You will wonder how you could have been so blind?
It began with a fudge of Sen McCain in stealthily sponsored non binding U.S. Sen Resolution 511. In that Candidates of apposing parties Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain set up essentially a hi-jack of [The People's Will] by attempting to [naturalize] by statute [natural born Citizen] a feat wholly fraudulent and apposing the laws of nature.
It was unassuming but very wicked; nefarious to the core protections of Americans national security. Now, one of those people is embedded with a similar yet consistent contention against, yet again, another serious National Security compromise.
Hillary Clinton set up her private server trafficking over 2000 sensitive and up to TOP SECRET intelligence emails through a non secure basic open line to avoid responsibility of FOIA which is an essential responsibility to The People, the FBI has had 147 Agents on this for near two years.
Hillary Clinton has consistently been an absolute [national security nightmare] for America. Many others are involved, but they are not running for President either. What is really surprising is Hillary is actually a natural born Citizen. She's qualified! #Clinton2016 #Democrats
What she is missing is Courage, and you can put that between her legs or anywhere you want but it all adds up to not preserving, protecting, and defending this Nation's Constitution which minorities need, which gays and lesbians and transgenders depend on, which abused women depend on. Hillary is the antithesis of what minorities need for protection.
It's TIME you recognized, YES a women can be PRESIDENT but It's going to take a women with more courage in her back then she's got and Obama and McCain in 2008 prove that! #EmailGate simply continues to prove that!
Courage stands up to Bullies. Courage stands up for the innocent. Courage in the U.S. Office of the President, that is indeed first and foremost an Election for the U.S, does not shirk The People's Will or the protections of our People for the platitudes of Foreign Interest.
Perhaps I'm not Popular in the Media because I took that fight on, but I'm not ashamed that I did anymore than Americans should be ashamed of being Americans. The World might guilt that but the U.S. is not the World.
Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 14-9396 was a Protection of your children -a Defense for our innocent. Those who are here with the prospects of an American Life rich in Freedom, Liberty, and Justice for ALL.
I see and hear women every day who say, 'My children are my world". I want to believe them. But WHY? Why would you sacrifice "your whole world" , your precious children and not defend your children, after saying something like that? WHY would you Vote for someone to put your Children in Harms Way?!
My Record America without the glitz, glamor, cheese or song- 7 Years 15 Cases all over this Nation defending our children, defending your children through the natural born Citizen Core of the Constitution. I AM and have been fighting for the Silent Majority.
[1)
Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court
5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama
Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme
Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court
12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah
Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama
U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396] [Other Courts 12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial 13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008 14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case 15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin]
I have not had your Support, but I have had your Back , and that only by the Love of God you have not known or understood, but the day will come you do. It might not be a good day for you.
That Day your regret will encompass you and you Will Stand with me. We will be Lions in the flocks of Sheep and no one will Stand against us for the grapes of wrath are tread and our Silence will be a Roar more terrible to the bones than any weapon. God Bless You.
I AM AMERICAN!
CRJ
www.codyjudy.us
Part II.GIVING BERNIE-THE -BIRD-BIRTHERS
In a Washington State Rally a little bird landed on the podium of Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders. It was a little sparrow. The excitement was electric and there is just nothing like a little bird, so delicate, agile, frail, yet quick and a masterful flyer. The crowd roared! It was so cute. Spontaneous, unplanned, what a feeling such a small creature could give such a large crowd.
Bernie used the symbolism of a sparrow to be that of a dove in a sign of love and peace. Of course a little sparrow is not a dove, nor is the qualifications for the Office of the President a [Citizen] as in the qualifications of Representatives or Senators unless you were born at the [Time] of the Adoption of the Constitution.
Those [Citizens] fought a Revolution, gave their blood in sacrificing for us that our Constitution might live. That is a supreme sacrifice and that is why [Citizen] was the grandfather clause needing to be embedded in the Constitution because no [natural born Citizens] existed. That would take Time for the New Nation to propagate.
GIVE-BERNIE-THE-BIRD-Birthers I haven't said to much about Sen. Bernie Sanders but he just said a lot here which illustrates the reason the American People "should-give-him-the-bird".
It's very telling when a Candidate for President, who is an Elected Official, in the attempt to denigrate a person sacrifices his oath to defend the Constitution.
Bernie takes a lot of things out of context and exaggerates them to create division if you notice. He does this masterfully by taking the sum of a few "illegal and criminal actions" perpetrated upon Americans in the criminal acts of first trespassing, and then committing crimes here, to generalizing these into classes of Law abiding Americans examples - African, Mexican, Latino.
Its the most Grandiose Spectacle of Exploitation I've ever seen and it's delinquency at its height of juvenile.
This is Division based on Color and Culture and at its core is division and plain Racism; but Bernie calls people racist who talk about people coming here illegally which is a Crime upon Americans. Everyone crossing a border illegally is Trespassing and that is a Crime that has as little to do with color as speeding.
You never really here Bernie talk about Caucasion Americans or the places we come from why is that? But he always classifies Black U.S. Citizens as African Americans?
Does Bernie not know Blacks have a multi Continental heritage? Blacks are not all from 'Africa' and they did not all originate from Africa any more than Canaan; Same with Brown people who did not all come from Mexico or Whites from Sweden.
Now the thing that made my blood boil in this video clip, (and it's a theme in Bernie's Stump Speech often repeated), was when Bernie classified a "Movement" in our Country to uphold the Qualifications of the Office of President as 'racist' or de-legitimate and called those of us who have fought long and hard for our U.S. Constitution "Birthers" as a pejorative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpRaFW31Uqg
This Constitutional Article II "Birther" Movement did nothing short of stand for the Constitution and all that is pure American- no divided allegiances no dual citizenship. The Office of President reserved for those who have done the Time here faithfully and true to the United States of America- simply [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].
Americans embarrassed about that who actually have no "dual allegiance" to another Country as "dual citizens" should take notice: people with one foot in one country and one foot in another with Dual Citizenship are in their lifetime making a commitment that was already made for you long ago.
When they stay, have children here, those children are 2nd Generation and only have 1 Country allegiance. Engraving a Country upon the hearts of the children takes time.
We only have 2 Offices requiring that Commitment of Time - President and Vice President requiring pure American no foreign allegiance aloud by birth place or by parents. Don't like it you can be a Representative, Senator, or even a Supreme Court Justice. Plenty of other Offices.
The unique Qualification for President/VP called [natural born Citizen] is also limited by two four year terms, and there's very good reason for it as incentive to come and stick around, as well because it is a natural barrier from foreign influence in the Executive Branch that could compromise Americans in many ways economically as well as militarily.
Yes I am a Birther if you want to call me that Senator Sanders, but I am American. We Birthers are American Patriots who love the Constitution.
The Birther Movement is no more about Sen. Barack Obama then it is also about Sen. John McCain, Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen.Marco Rubio, or Gov. Bobby Jindal all of who have been mentioned in my Litigation in the U.S. Supreme Court - Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396 as unqualified under the Standard.
You will NOTICE Sen. #BernieSanders#Sanders2016 [every color] is included in the [Qualification for President] in the Constitution because no color is excluded from the Office of President!
This is not about [Color] it's about [TIME]! Your denigration of American is sickening to me and nauseating. You denigrate Americans under the Supreme Law of this Land in the Office of a Senator? That is despicable and unworthy character needed for the Office.
If Bernie Sanders can't respect the U.S. Constitution and the qualifications of the Office of the President he's for the birds and Americans should give him the bird. Resign! Swim to Cuba enjoy the Socialistic Communism Experience there if you can't stand the U.S. Constitution. We here in the United States of America are United under the U.S. Constitution and the Office of President and that is much bigger and much more than a Defacto President in "Barack Obama".
Cody Robert Judy
Democratic Party Candidate for President
2016
Cody's
Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that
has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of
the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the
collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a
choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every
dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your
individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy,
you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because
he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder
than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1)
Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court
5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama
Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme
Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court
12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah
Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama
U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Shoplifting is a crime most people would recognize as wrong. Taking someone's property that isn't yours is not right. As I was at the throne in Walmart brainstorming a political post, my head cocked to the right as I read the sign staring me in the face. "Shoplifting is Stealing. It's a crime. Even if it's your first offense, you could be punished with a lengthy prison term and a substantial monetary fine, plus a record that will haunt you for the rest of your life. "What", I thought, "made the Office of the President any less valuable to the U.S. Supreme Court than anything sold at Walmart?"
Most Constitutional Scholars do recognize the importance of 'Standing' in legal doctrine. It is the doctrine that prohibits those who witness an accident from suing for shock from those actually suffering the accident who are in shock or critically injured. Sarah Helene Duggin of the Constitution Center opined "in the absence of an Amendment the clause should be narrowly interpreted.", recognizing attempts to change the definition Legislatively have failed through the Elected Leaders of the People, the Court's definite Challenge in waiting for Presidential Candidates to bring a case to them, and the difficulty in navigating the case through the political minefields of particular party nominees that bring the ship so close to elections. Obama's first big challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court came in 2008 from a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania ,Democratic Party chairmen of Montgomery County, and author of recently released ObamaScare, Phil J. Berg. The lawsuit was dismissed due to a lack of standing. (Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) Phil Berg was not a Presidential Candidate and his assertion of standing due to an infringement of his voting capacity to vote for an eligible candidate did not convince the U.S. Supreme Court.
That technicality of "Standing" however has never been used in any of the Cases brought by '08, '12, and 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) - the only Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record in the defense of the [natural born Citizen] ie. [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] , qualification for the Office of President in the U.S. Constitution's Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. See: Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama.
In CRJ's latest U.S. Supreme Court case considered closed only 2 months ago due to the SCOTUS refusing his forma pauperis Motion, that had been granted by his two lower Court in the Federal District Utah Division and the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and which was coincidentally granted by the U.S. Supreme Court in 12-5276, he stated, "It's just a real shame that the Office of the President is valued less in the U.S. Supreme Court Justice's minds, than stolen property from Walmart or the value of a dog. "
Like small businesses struggling to survive the Campaigns of Presidential Candidates often also incorporated, demand huge amounts of time, talent, attention, products and services. "In the malfeasance of Justice represented by the Justices Review, in light of their decisions and the evidence had in the Motion for forma pauperis with the balance of the Writ of Certiorari hanging, small businesses that are subject to the same rules can fail and the big ones are aloud to survive. Its basically Open Season to Steal all of the hard work that has gone into my Campaigns for President over the last seven years", Judy said. "I'm sure any business owner would agree with me, it really hurts when shoplifting is rampant. "
The assertions in Judy's complaint actually do address the illegal formations present in Presidential Political Campaigns as businesses or Corporations, that can form illegal cartels with each other apposing the U.S. Constitution. These are indeed Standards subject to rules and regulations of big businesses like the Sherman Act and Clayton Act afford in the formations of giant monopolies meant to curb the illegal actions of wiping out small businesses or in CRJ's case smaller campaigns, who are still beholden to rules. This begs the question- are Big Campaigns too big to Fail based on violations of the Constitution as a Standard or the money that is collected in contributions?
The PEOPLE'S TRUST of POTUS as PROPERTY afforded Dismal PROTECTION
by SCOTUS for THE PEOPLE in the Checks and Balance Assignment
In the last Democratic Party Debate held on a three-day weekend on a Sunday Night receiving just barely half of the viewership that Republican Debates have received held during the week days, mostly in prime time, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared in a warning to Big Bank Bailouts 'There should be no Bank too big to fail, or individual too big to jail".
Sept 2nd 2015 PF The Fact-Checker's Guide
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/sep/02/11
-examples-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-hol/
Of course what came out of Hillary Clinton's Debate did not represent what she voted for. As a U.S. Senator she in fact supported "too Big to Fail" in the support of Troubled Asset Relief Program or TARP I.
It was even shocking to hear those words come out of Hillary's mouth while a pending FBI Investigation, continually denied as ongoing, was mired in recent revelations of SAP evidence exceeding TOP Secret that have the FBI legitimacy pitted against Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign.
On that subject, all things are Political according to the defense of Hillary Clinton's Campaign against the FBI Investigation despite laws, regulations, and Hillary Clinton's own signature subjecting herself to those regulations of Top Security Clearances. The totality of the investigation is a vast right wing conspiracy to her. So what would Hillary Clinton or her Campaign call the assault upon the qualifications of the Office of the President in the U.S. Constitution- a vast right wing conspiracy? With Ted Cruz involved, probably.
Indeed, the link that really should exist or concern American's between Hillary Clinton's allegedly targeting women who were victims of affairs with her husband Bill, that one women described as writing the book on terrorizing women on terrorism, and the Emailgate of national security being compromised on her Private Server, is the motive of both of them: Tyrannical Control.
Galvanizing support in discrediting testimony of course is a tactic used by lawyers in defense of those assaulting women in an effort to amass control of a runaway demonizing prosecution. The same motive exist for Hillary Clinton in choosing to use a Private Email Server where she gains the totality of control on what Emails will and won't be released in Freedom of Information Act or FOIA Request. The control of the information and then the framing of that information is critical in presenting the picture to the Media and by the Media to the General Public. The motive between the two is then the "Control Factor". Control the testimony's to Bill's infidelities, and control the FOIA request with the use of her private server, to hell with national security?
The POLITICS OF LAW v. The STANDARD OF LAW
Throughout our entire lives we have always hoped that somehow the Politics of our Law was immune to the Standard of our Law. In this rested the wisdom of giving the U.S. Supreme Court Justices life tenure. They would never have to endure an Election Process which might subject them to the bending and shifting Politicians go through to attract the votes necessary to win an Elected Office with promises often unfulfilled and broken- aka. "You can keep your Doctor".
This allowed and afforded SCOTUS Justices great latitude in the assignment of simply Standing for the Standard of the U.S. Constitution. What has happened to that Assignment in regards to the Qualifications of [natural born Citizen ] distinct to the Office of the President and Vice President? Have the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court politicized or made political their own assignments by refusing to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 based on a refusal to grant Forma Pauperis where it should have been granted by all accounts? It is a 12 month Form for God's sake, come on, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to conclude an arbitrary denial has taken place.
But has the U.S. Constitution even become Politicized? The interest of course is there with so many different States coming into agreement with varying laws that the 10th Amendment was witnesses as necessary to allow and afford States Rights independent and in a defense of the Claim of Federal Dictatorship. This emphasized the difference of English Common Law and the Laws of Nations or principles of natural law.
Of course great differences existed in the Colony States, but probably the most understated, mutually agreed upon, edict of all with no disagreement was the [natural born Citizen] Clause of the Qualifications of the Office of President. They all agreed it was a really good idea. Yes, they were from many different perspectives and opinions in total agreement.
Now instead of a simple refusal to look at the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution disagreed upon by two Candidates for President, one holding damages by the other's crippling regard to rules and regulations in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, you have the stark addition to the introduction of cruelty for economic conditions seen in a denial of access to Justice by the highest Court.
To label it mildly egregious is as misleading as seeing the Flint, Michigan Government Officials cover-up lead poisoning findings and assert everything is fine while the residence of Flint complaints steadily stream that the water looks, smells, and taste bad. Understanding the Office of the President should be protected as rigorously by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices as the Mayor and Governors should protect water.
Interestingly it was the ACLU who leaked the Internal EPA contamination of the water. The American Civil Liberties Union whose stated mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
So does the ACLU figure water is more important in value than the Office of the President's qualification denied by the egregious denial of a Forma Pauperis Motion? Apparently so. American's know that shoplifting is a crime and is prosecuted heavily and they also know and see that stealing the White House is aloud in a polluted, ill-hearted, and poisoned defense of the most important Office in the U.S. Constitution. This cannot stand.
It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime!
CRJ
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
