STONES : primary

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Friday, May 27, 2016

HILLARY CLINTON TRIAL (FOIA) - Deposition Witness #1 Lewis Alan Lukens- State Department EXDrctr Exposing State Stupid Secrets

SPECIAL REPORT

______________________

~HILLARY CLINTON TRIAL (FOIA) ~

Deposition Witness #1 Lewis Alan Lukens- State Department EXD

__________________________________-

WITNESS #1 DEPOSITION of Lewis Alan Lukens

Deputy Executive Secretary of the State Department

& Executive Director 2008-2011

For those who didn't think Hillary Clinton's Practices as Secretary of State would every come under Trial, or think the FBI Investigation is taking too long, or haven't had enough with the release of the long-anticipated State Department Inspector General’s special report which implicated her May 25th in incompetence and unlawful practice in policy check out Judicial Watch, Inc. -v- U.S. Department State Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 13-CV-1363 action is kicking into full gear, covered on CSPAN. The first witness was called Wednesday May 18th, 2016 with some juicy details we'd like you to consider in the upcoming June 7th California Primary for the nomination of the Democratic Primary. One of the important things to remember is the Witnesses are questioned under oath.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-lukens-testimony-01363/

If there is a lesson coming for feminism, it is that equality in gender doesn't mean preferential treatment as a women in the mental capabilities expected, in Government Jobs at least. That should be received as a good sign!

If your as lazy as the rest of the Main Stream Media who didn't want to read through all those 'tiny' letters for two hours, we did it for you and will discuss here 6 of the most tantalizing screen shots.

The first thing as we go through this that is notable is the complete dereliction of the State Department under Obama, or is it even worse than that... simply 'protocol? For the record, we don't buy they didn't know, or were not talking about Hillary Clinton's Private Server, and here's why. The testimony just doesn't make sense if you start analyzing it.

We are to believe that a 'stand alone' computer is proposed for Hillary Clinton, in an office space even prohibiting cell phones because of sensitivity of communication and eaves dropping ability, that would bypass the State Department's System, plugged into an non-secure phone line, so Hillary Clinton can communicate with her family and friends in private and that is what is being discussed in the email transactions?

Where is my 'smiley hilarious-water-flooding- eye emoji s'? You know the FBI has got to be laughing over "Stupid" at some of the things being done here, and what the public is being told to buy?

What's wrong with stepping out to call her family or friends? Does the State Department's Deputy Director question any of Hillary Clinton's aids in the protocol of having an official government email to conduct business? Nope.

They are selling us a great story of their concern for her family and friends, and a system that is not traceable by The Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA). They are kind-of-missing the idea here of the position being responsible to the Public which was obviously not a high priority.

In fact if we didn't know better in understanding Hillary Clinton's private server set up meant especially to foil FOIA, We'd say the State Department did just about everything but set it up in her office themselves.

So we are to swallow a few acts of protocol here. There are concerns for the 7th Floor communication in regards to security, but none whatsoever about setting up a Standardized Email for the new incoming Secretary of State?

The next most preposterous thing I've ever heard is the explanation of "what was meant by connecting the Internet without going through your system?" asked of Mr. Lukens.

Basically he explained the desire for an outside communication device, such as a computer hooked into an unsecured phone line that was just ... open all the time? Hummm, that's making a lot of sense. Hogwash!

We do find out this "System" would have been completely different than any other employees, but not because of the security of it, but rather because of the OPENNESS of it.

Now of course you might be suspecting now that the in-house system is pretty closed down, no access to the Internet systems public domains, or email companies and she wants basic internet access to Gmail that is not provided?

Absolutely not!

No, We got Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo, everything on the System!, says the State Department Executive Director.

There may be a few firewalls to prevent employees from hitting the hard core Tea Party dating or porn sites, but generally public email is possible in the State System so once your in it all you need to do is type in GMail and log in with your pass word and you have got a connection to your personal email.

Why wasn't that good enough for Hillary Clinton? You mean she could not figure out how to type in 'Gmail' hit the log-in button and type her personal pass-word in for personal communication with her family and friends... right?

The reason now is that the 'Log-In' process of that is too complicated for the person who wants to be President of the United States? Are you getting the drift now as you read these about the pile of bull they are asking you to stand in?

So he's asked to describe the system that would not have been connected to the State Department's OpenNet email system and asked "Why" that would be necessary in the first place if she had capabilities of accessing the many public domains available for public emailing like the rest of the State Department did.

"For Ease of Access"

Of course, because if she had to type in "Gmail", click "Log-In" and a password to her private email account, through the OpenNet system of the State Department, the computer knowledge of famous Hackers like Guccifer would be needed? The hacker claiming to have hacked into her "private server" through compromising her friend Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account?

But wait.. there's more. Get this, "it would have been easier for her to [log-in}", meaning she still would have had to do the bear minimum of accessing the email. She still would have had to "Log In", the easier part would have been just not having to type in her pass word to the State Department's OpenNet System first, so she would have had to do it twice , maybe with two different pass words?

Again, we are talking about the capabilities here often assigned to Grade School kids and she want's to run the Country with the smarts of less than competent capability in our modern world?

So we learn that Hillary Clinton cannot run a computer, but assigning out the set-up for a Private Server, so that she is able to fully erase and scrub emails thereby avoiding FOIA is acceptable and she is knowledgeable about?

But wait, she expects her employees under her to all use the Government Emails System? Yes, A 2011 State Department cable from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admonished employees not to use personal email, for security reasons.

Can you imagine Hillary Clinton's deposition on her knowledge of FOIA having years and years of constant experience of coming up with documents and reports while she was married to the President of the United States and also elected as a U.S. Senator in New York?

So we are clear, the State Department System had Internet capabilities. Certainly then the next understanding in not knowing how to run a computer or email with a computer is that she didn't email very much.. like her husband who once claimed in a speech to have sent out only two emails?
Oh..ouch!, that was not really true was it?

Of course it's been awhile since 1998 when the he sent out that first email, but records show he had an email account in 1993. Seems Hillary Clinton does not yet know how to push the button and click the link?

The next tall-tale we find is that the State Department Executive Director sites 'Passwords' that must be entered to get in the OpenNet System of the State Department. Think about the Stallone movie Cliffhanger, where the plot involves a complicated system of pass-words changing every hour on a device inaccessible without the code to find the cases that contain millions of dollars worth of bonds?

The password must have been changed daily, no.. weekly.. no wait every eight weeks. "Probably too many times" for a 68 year old?

I mean if Hillary Clinton doesn't want us to bring her age into the debate of capabilities, then why does she press us with inabilities based on memory?

Lewis A. Lukens witness discussed today, Cheryl D. Mills up next.

For a list of the dates coming up for the other witnesses check out our first post.

Later, we find out there is not "pass-words" to remember, but a "Pass Word", and the log-in process of the "System" that was being emailed about and thought as a good idea by State Department Employees was "never actually set up". It was all smoke that disappeared, but Clinton's Private Server didn't disappear.

Of course we know it was not ever really set up in the State Department Building where her Office was, but we do know it was set-up in her Home.

I privately wonder that the 2000 emails deemed classified and 22 top secret correspondences detailing reports that will never be released, are Clinton's emails to Obama threatening to release the details confirming his 'long form fabrication' that the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear based on a denied forma pauperis motion in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Can't you just see the FBI Director laughing about that one? She did make the trip to Great Britain on her way to Africa to visit their Records Department.

Today, May 27th, 2016, Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's former Chief of Staff, is being called under oath as the next Witness.

The Judge granted Cheryl Mills request that the video of the proceeding deposition would not be made public as she thought it might be sliced and diced as Presidential Political Commercial material to ruin Hillary Clinton's chances in perhaps the California Primary, but the Judge will allow the Transcript to be made public, minus any State Stupid Secrets being made public of course.

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders threaten to Debate for Charity

We'll try and tackle these one at a time as we see the depositions for you. Donald Trump may be a little too busy with Bernie Sanders.

Mean time, Hillary's got to be fuming about potentially being left out of the Debate between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT!❤Sanders submitted Q for Trump (challenging him to Debate. (Hillary Clinton canceled CA. Debate w Bernie)), and Trump submitted Q for Sanders on Jimmy Kimmel Live Show (If DNC Superdelegates "steal" the Democratic Nomination from you, will you run as an Independent?)
Networks are already reported to be now bidding the Debate Out for Charity.

You know, one of the knew Rules of the Democratic Party this year was that if any Officially Recognized FEC Democratic Party Presidential Candidate, such as myself, debated in an "unsanctioned Debate" they would not be invited to a Democratic Party sanctioned debate. I wonder if Hillary Clinton refusing to Debate in California has upset the DNC Chairmen Debbie Washerman Schultz, or if there is a penalty for canceling a Debate?

As our attention is focused on Hillary Clinton's Campaign in the current investigations going on, I hope Democrats will reflect upon the Choices at least one official Candidate in myself has been trying to explain to them in very clear and concise Print, even as Bernie Sanders has floated it, the Coronation was a bad idea and the exclusion of myself in Debates was not inclusive or meritorious of the respect our Democratic Party Members deserved.

Excluding me was not representative of any confidence in the voters or representative of Choice, but of dictatorship, tyranny and a denial of Facts I hope to be able to Debate!

CRJ

Have you anything to offer? Let it be your Record of Joinder with me as as Friends.
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
#Democrats ‪#‎Republicans‬ ‪#‎Independents‬ #DemDebate #CRJ2016
Contribute:
http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.

www.codyjudy.us

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Special Report: Why Democrats Must Prosecute Hillary Clinton for HER Private Server/ Deny the Nomination for President

A BREAKING SPECIAL REPORT
The Post & Email
Featured Editorial

________________________

Why the Democratic Party Must

Prosecute Hillary Clinton

for HER "Private Server" and Deny the Nomination for President

________

The contemplation of prosecuting one of your own family is probably one of the most difficult gut-wrenching decisions a person can be called to make. To sacrifice family in the interest of Justice can be near self-mutilation. In politics it may be easier to prosecute an opposing party on the other side of the isle, but it can be very difficult to allow Justice to take it's place in behest of someone who is dearly loved and admired as an example of Justice for All, but this is America and that is what we stand for.

In the advent, interest, and primary goal of choosing a Candidate for President each Political Party must decide among themselves who best represents their Platform - a Primary Season is very much a test of what will come up from the other side of the isle in making a decision for a Candidate for the Office of the President and assuring that person is the best in representing the Party Platform. That's why it shouldn't be easy. In keeping with both the Democratic Party 'open big tent' and America's Tradition here is the most plain and simple reasons that the Democratic Party must choose to prosecute Hillary Clinton and deny her the Presidential Nomination of the Democratic party.Here is why #Democrats who pull the Voting Lever for ❤Hillary Clinton actually must pray for #RacialInequality, must hope for #GenderDiscrimination, and have set their eye upon #DeferredProsecution because in a Racially Equal World, in Perfect Gender Equality, and in an Economical Justice for all in the USA ❤Hillary Clinton as a rich white female should be Prosecuted equal to a poor black male and that can't happen if she is aloud off as a crook.

In the official capacity of the Office of Secretary of State - the USA's Top Foreign Diplomat Office, the greater responsibility towards Conduct is Expected and Demanded. There is no gray area with setting up a [Private Server] for the U.S. Government to conduct it's business on! No one has EVER EVER EVER done that.. No one!

Top Democrat Party Leaders recognize that! Debbie Wasserman Schultz has recognized that publicly Folks, when in an argument, she confided " accept setting up a Private Server" recognizing no Secretary of State has ever dared do that to Avoid FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) the Public Accountability Arm of our Government.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz
VIDEO March 21st 2016 Schultz attempts to push Hillary's "Email" was the Problem rather then the [setting up of a Server]
[“She’s actually said if she had it to go back and do it again, she would not have used private email, but in terms of what she was doing with compliance, that she was compliant,” Schultz said.
“I don’t think it’s only using private email, but it’s also having the server. She’s made the case in the past that other secretaries of state have had Gmail accounts,” Bartiromo said. “Sure, you can have a Gmail account if you’re not using it for government business, but the key is she’s the only one who actually had a server in her basement.”]

VIDEO April 24th, 2016
Chris Wallace calls Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the "Email" verses the "Server" difference at 1min 56 seconds Schultz is mixing terms for Clinton to confuse the public in the terms of email that other secretary of states have used while they were in office, but then she acknowledges "other than the Private Server". Then she buckles up and defends her obfuscation of 'email' again to focus attention away from "server" and then she laughs saying she wasn't counting to the question posed by Chris Wallace "Not 30,000!"

Schultz opines its about helping "everybody who wants to succeed have a fair shot to do so".
Did Schultz give Cody Robert Judy a 'fair shot' to do so as the Chair head of the Democratic Party inviting him to Debates? No. Did Washerman offer a second tier for Candidates in the Democratic Party? No. Did Washerman provide the Email Server of the Democratic Party at the beginning of the process to all Federally Declared Candidates for the Democratic Party? No.

Even Unintentional SHARING or mis-handeling in the official Government Office is prosecuted as misconduct, in the Secretary of State Office with penalties for Criminal Violation. Here's a Report of Three Laws Clinton may have violated.

But as Democrats can we sit by and allow the Democratic Party to be taken over by a Candidate who is going to be prosecuted by the standard that we all have the ability to figure out? For instance everyone already knows , no one un-intentionally told Hillary Clinton to set up a [Private Server] for the US Government to conduct official business on while she was Secretary of State. We can all figure that out.

We can also all figure out pretty easily that Foreign Governments do not give millions of dollars to the Clinton Charity Organization - The Clinton Global Initiative without expectations of favor.


If Clinton's Clowning is Permitted Justice is Mocked

Therefore it was not unintentionally misconduct, it was deliberate. And it was criminally motivated to Avoid accountability by and to FOIA. She became a rogue entity to the United States Government in what can only be identified as deliberate acts of espionage compromising any outside U.S. Government Oversight to that Position!

While she was employed by [We The People], while she got paid by us she altered the key responsibility of the duties and became Self-Employed while in the Office. She created and completed Nixon's sentiment confession in the David Frost's Interview [that If the President did it it was Legal]

That's an interesting deliberation because it was indeed Hillary Clinton who in the prosecution of President Nixon did not want him to be able to receive Legal Counsel on the WaterGate Scandal. Hillary Clinton was on the Team prosecuting Nixon for essentially 'acting unlawfully in the office' and obtaining evidence unfairly or through the break-in. Like Nixon, Hillary Clinton devised a way to avoid public accountability. No Email of hers on her [Private Server] conducting Government Business would be released in FOIA without her oversight. She became self-employed and rogue. That meant she was only accountable to herself in the office of secretary of state rather then the People, while she received a monthly salary. She could delete what she did not want seen and no oversight was possible.

Nixon Relates "I believed when the President does it, it is not illegal"

It was done to avoid the Public Oversight in an Official Public Capacity and her Choice was that compromising Top Secret Reports and Data to Foreign States was acceptable, worth the price, and potential penalties, she acknowledged and recognized with her signature completely.

The Private Email Server was known by Obama officials of the State Department all along, even before Hillary Clinton took the oath of office.

STILL REPORT #573
Emails January 24th, 2009 ' The Stand Alone Separate network PC is [a] great idea From under-secretary for managment Patrick Kennedy of the State Department CC: Huma Abedine, Daniel Smith
Also- January 24th, 2009 Luwis Lukens former Deputy Secretary of State and Executive Director of the Secretariat [set up stand alone PC in the Secretaries Office connect to system but not through our system to enable her to check her email from her desk..] CC: Huma Abedine, Patrick Kennedy, Daniel B

She's running for Office to avoid the accountability hoping, praying, counting on gender and racial and economical inequality so she will not be Prosecuted as a rich white female.

These Facts lay bear the entire Democratic Party Platform as nothing but hypocritical to it's base. That's why I'm fighting to be heard, fighting for the Platform of Justice, fighting as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party.


Romanian Hacker Guccifer recounts Breaching HRC Server

Our Nation should be a forgiving Nation after the Time for the Crime is done and paid for. To continue to prosecute after that is wrong.

We here in America do believe in second chances, we do believe in forgivness, but not at the expense and as a substitute of Justice for All - for Justice for a Few and Deferred Prosecution for the rich, powerful, appointed, white woman.

That is not Justice for All. That is a mockery of Justice; A mockery of economic Justice, a mockery of Racial Equality, a mockery of Gender Equality.

If #Democrats choose ❤Hillary Clinton as their Presidential Nominee they must sacrifice ALL they stand for, and all they hope for first. Federal Damage Assessments are now being conducted by the FBI Investigation per protocol into the Hillary Clinton Server National Security Breach.

If #Democrats choose Cody Robert Judy as their Presidential Nominee ALL they hope for, ALL they dream of, ALL they Espouse in their Platform is seen as Possible and True in the eyes of ALL THE WORLD!!!

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
www.codyjudy.us

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

Friday, January 15, 2016

Breaking Report: The Constitutional Question of Presidential Eligibility - Who is Asking?

Breaking Report:

The Constitutional Question of President Eligibility

Who is Asking?

CRUZ's IMPRESSIVE DEBATE SKILLS

Americans, everyone of us must ask why we do not agree that a Foreigner should rule in the Office of President even if they are smart and have experience in some form of Government?

The Office of POTUS is a Key to the Military and Economy of the entire USA. It is our most vulnerable Position and our highest Ranked.

Obama has in his Tenure of 7 Years signed for an additional 10 Trillion in Debt. That's 70K for every man, woman, and child. The debt due notice could yet cost more lives in America than ever in our History.

Still think it's not an important question?

In the Debate Cruz like Obama minimized the importance of the Constitutional Qualification saying in affect we should move on to important questions and issues facing America.

Cruz out right lied about Mr. Trumps mother needing to be a natural born Citizen that would include 3 generations instead of 2 Generations.

[Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] includes the children born in the U.S to immigrants who become U.S. Citizens before the child's birth. That's 2nd Generation.

So Cruz exaggerated the Claims of Birthers to further isolate us and in doing so compromise our National Security and well being.

He is a skilled debater and most are unable to wrestle him down and pin him.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/live-from-charleston/2016/01/ted-cruz-goes-there-217816

U.S. Senator Cruz & U.S. Senator Rubio asked to encourage the
U.S. Supreme Court to hear the Case deciding [natural born Citizen]

Sen. Cruz may have argued in the U.S. Supreme Court but he has never argued the [natural born Citizen] clause for the Office of the President in the U.S. Supreme Court. He has also done just about everything but advocate that the U.S. Supreme Court actually settle the Term with a precedent case for Presidential Candidates.

Do you recall when Senator Cruz was given a special invitation to weigh in to the U.S. Supreme Court with encouraging that Court settle the matter before he collected 39 Million Dollars for his Campaign?

This is by any reasonable account of Law the very most important issue of our Time. American's should be doing everything in their power to see to it that the [natural born Citizen] qualification Principle be upheld in the United States Supreme Court for the Office of the President. Our survival depends upon it. Our Union depends upon it. To assert any other question will have more impact upon the future of America is really naive. It is the Principle of our Time and we must take a stand for the Constitution or face living the consequences without it.

We simply cannot expect the motivations of Politicians to be the chief interpreters of the Constitution and that includes myself. At least however, I have been the one advocating the U.S. Supreme Court have a look.

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

INSPIRING - I believe in You